Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 456
1.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 27 Suppl 1: 100-108, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38299981

OBJECTIVES: The present study aims to quantitatively assess secondary alveolar bone graft (SABG) resorption in unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate (UCLAP) patients in a 2-3 year longitudinal follow-up setting by using a validated 3D protocol. Furthermore, the potential relation of SABG resorption with maxillary canine position and a number of patient-related factors was investigated. METHODS: UCLAP patients who underwent SABG and had good quality CBCT images at the following timepoints were included in the study: pre-operative (T0), immediate (T1), 6 months (T2) and either 1-2 years (T3) or 2-3 years (T4) post-operative. The final bone grafted region was defined on the T1 scans and refined in the registered T0 scans. The bone graft after resorption was determined by applying threshold-based segmentation on the registered T2, T3 or T4 scans within the segmented bone graft volume. The position of the canines was determined at every timepoint at the cleft and non-cleft side. RESULTS: Forty-five UCLAP patients (mean age 9.0 ± 1.3 years) were included. In the first 6 months after SABG, 43.6% bone resorption was recorded. 2-3 years post-operative, 56% bone resorption was found if the maxillary canine was not yet erupted and 42.7% if it erupted through the graft. The vertical position of the canines was significantly higher on the cleft side at T3. CONCLUSIONS: The present study reports significant SABG resorption over time. However, no correlation was found between SABG resorption and canine position, nor between other patient-related factors.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Imaging, Three-Dimensional , Humans , Cleft Palate/surgery , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Lip/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Bone Grafting/methods , Male , Female , Follow-Up Studies , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Child , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Longitudinal Studies , Cuspid/diagnostic imaging , Bone Resorption/diagnostic imaging
2.
Eur J Orthod ; 46(2)2024 Apr 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38346109

BACKGROUND: Several methods have been proposed to assess outcome of bone-grafted alveolar clefts on cone beam computed tomography (CBCT), but so far these methods have not been compared and clinically validated. OBJECTIVES: To validate and compare methods for outcome assessment of bone-grafted clefts with CBCT and provide recommendations for follow-up. METHODS: In this observational follow-up study, two grading scales (Suomalainen; Liu) and the volumetric bone fill (BF) were used to assess the outcome of 23 autogenous bone-grafted unilateral alveolar clefts. The mean age at bone grafting was 9 years. The volumetric BF was assessed in five vertical sections. The bone-grafted cleft outcome was based on a binary coding (success or regraft) on a clinical multidisciplinary expert consensus meeting. Grading scales and volumetric assessment were compared in relation to the bone-grafted cleft outcome (success or regraft). Reliability for the different outcome variables was analyzed with intra-class correlation and by calculating kappa values. LIMITATIONS: The study had a limited sample size. Clinical CBCT acquisitions had a varying tube current and exposure time. RESULTS: Volumetric 3D measurements allowed for outcome assessment of bone-grafted alveolar clefts with high reliability and validity. The two grading scales showed highly reliable outcomes, yet the validity was high for the Suomalainen grading scale but low for the Liu grading scale. CONCLUSIONS: Volumetric 3D measurement as well as the Suomalainen grading can be recommended for outcome assessment of the bone-grafted cleft. Yet, one must always make a patient-specific assessment if there is a need to regraft.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Child , Humans , Bone Transplantation , Alveolar Bone Grafting/methods , Cleft Lip/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Lip/surgery , Follow-Up Studies , Reproducibility of Results , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Palate/surgery , Outcome Assessment, Health Care , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods
3.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 52(3): 310-315, 2024 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38212164

To retrospectively review the clinical effect of comprehensive treatment of alveolar cleft (CTAC) using the mandible as the bone source. Patients with alveolar clefts who met the inclusion criteria were subjected to a CTAC protocol that included the following: (1) preoperative orthodontic treatment for creating good soft-tissue conditions; (2) 'area-like grafting' with subperiosteal osteogenic chin bone instead of cartilaginous osteogenic iliac bone; (3) simulation of normal bone anatomy via a sandwich-like bone graft consisting of 'cortical bone + cancellous bone + cortical bone'; and (4) strong internal fixation to ensure initial bone block stability. At 6 months postoperatively, the titanium plate was removed and cone-beam computed tomography was performed to evaluate the surgical results. A total of 54 patients underwent treatment with the CTAC protocol. The average age at the initial operation was 10.3 ± 2.1 years, and the average hospital stay was 2.8 ± 0.6 days. At 6 months postoperatively, 49 patients (90.7%) showed good clinical results. The transplanted bone block formed a 'cortical bone + cancellous bone + cortical bone' structure similar to that of the normal jawbone. A mature bone bridge formed, and the impacted permanent teeth continued to erupt and enter the bone graft area. CTAC is a comprehensive restorative solution for alveolar cleft repair that integrates multiple concepts, including orthodontics, embryology, anatomy, and improvements to surgical methods. The method is easy to perform, causes little surgical trauma, and shows a stable success rate, and is thus worth promoting.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cancellous Bone , Treatment Outcome , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Palate/surgery , Bone Transplantation/methods , Mandible , Alveolar Bone Grafting/methods
4.
Cleft Palate Craniofac J ; 61(5): 791-800, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36748327

OBJECTIVE: The purpose is to evaluate outcomes of alveolar bone grafting based on the pre-grafting orthodontic preparation methods. DESIGN: Retrospective analysis of individuals with unilateral cleft lip and palate. SUBJECTS AND SETTINGS: 28 individuals with non-syndromic UCLP from two craniofacial centers, 14 individuals each from XXXX and XXXX. INTERVENTIONS: The alignment group underwent maxillary expansion with incisors alignment while the non-alignment group underwent only maxillary expansion for presurgical orthodontic preparation. METHODS: Initial and post-surgical CBCT scans were compared to observe changes in angulation of the incisor adjacent to the cleft site, alveolar bony root coverage, and bone graft outcomes. RESULTS: In the alignment group, the buccolingual rotation decreased by 32.35 degrees (p = .0002), the anteroposterior inclination increased by 14.01 degrees (p = .0004), and the mesiodistal angulation decreased by 17.88 degrees (p = .0001). Alveolar bony coverage did not change after bone graft in both groups, and no difference was observed between the groups. Chelsea scale showed satisfactory bone graft outcome (category A, C) in 12 cases (85.71%) in the alignment group and 11 cases (78.51%) in the non-alignment group. The volumetric measurement showed the alignment group had better bone fill of 69.85% versus 51.45% in the non-alignment group (p = .0495). CONCLUSIONS: Alveolar bony coverage on the tooth adjacent to cleft sites did not change with alveolar bone grafting surgery in either of the alignment and non-alignment group. Presurgical orthodontic alignment does not induce root exposure nor poorer bone grafting outcome.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography , Humans , Alveolar Bone Grafting/methods , Cleft Lip/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Palate/surgery , Retrospective Studies
5.
Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 28(1): 315-321, 2024 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36826684

PURPOSE: The aim of present study was to compare and evaluate the maxillary alveolar ridge formation and ridge continuity using cancellous and corticocanellous bone graft harvested from anterior iliac crest for complete secondary unilateral cleft alveolus defects. MATERIAL AND METHOD: All patients were randomized into two groups for secondary alveolar bone grafting. Group I (n = 10) patients treated with cancellous particulate bone graft and group II (n = 10) patients treated with cortico-cancellous block graft. Maxillary alveolar ridge bone formation was assessed with the help of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan using Planmeca Romexis Viewer 5.0 software. Maxillary alveolar ridge continuity was assessed with axial section of CBCT scan and clinical occlusal photograph. Preoperative CBCT scan and occlusal photographs were compared with post-op 6-month CBCT scan and occlusal photographs. RESULT: The mean preoperative volume of cleft defect in group I was 4.2576 cm3 whereas in group II it was 4.2268 cm3. The mean postoperative bone bridge formation after 6 months in group I was 4.055 cm3 whereas in group II it was 3.8103 cm3. Preoperative and 6-month postoperative axial sections of CBCT scans were compared and 100% maxillary alveolar ridge continuity was achieved in both groups. The preoperative and postoperative occlusal photographs of both the groups were compared and showed accurate bone and well aligned maxillary alveolar ridge formation in all patients. CONCLUSION: The present study concluded that maxillary alveolar ridge formation rate is less in cortico-cancellous iliac crest block graft compared to cancellous iliac crest particulate graft, but is equally good as cancellous bone graft. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: (REF/2020/09/031605)/ CTRI/ 2020/09/028001.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Cancellous Bone , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Palate/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Alveolar Process/diagnostic imaging , Alveolar Process/surgery , Bone Transplantation/methods , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods , Cleft Lip/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Lip/surgery
6.
Spec Care Dentist ; 44(1): 12-27, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36721338

OBJECTIVE: To review the existing evidence on the adjuvant use of autologous platelet concentrates (APCs) with iliac crest bone graft (ICBG) in the reconstruction of the secondary alveolar cleft. METHODS: Electronic databases were searched systematically until November 2022. Clinical trials comparing the three-dimensional radiological outcomes of patients who underwent secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) with ICBG and APCs to those with ICBG alone and the radiological outcomes assessed 6 months after surgery were included. Two authors performed the study selection and the assessment of the risk of bias. Meta-analysis was performed using the random-effects model to determine the risk ratio (RR) for developing wound dehiscence and the mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) for the percentage of newly formed bone. RESULTS: Nine studies (seven RCT and two CCT) were included with a low to high risk of bias. At the 6-month follow-up, the study group revealed insignificant results regarding the percentage of newly formed bone (MD = 6.49; 95% CI: -0.97, 13.94; p = .09; χ2  = 0.01; I2  = 71%). In addition, the overall risk of developing wound dehiscence was lower in the study group (RR = 0.34; 95% CI: 0.15, 0.78; p = .01; χ2  = 0.67; I2  = 0%). CONCLUSION: Currently, there is insufficient evidence to support the adjuvant use of APCs with ICBG on enhanced bone regeneration following secondary alveolar bone grafting. However, combining ICBG and APCs might be beneficial in reducing the risk of developing wound dehiscence.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Palate , Humans , Cleft Palate/surgery , Alveolar Bone Grafting/methods , Bone Regeneration
7.
Plast Reconstr Surg ; 153(4): 897-903, 2024 Apr 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37092973

BACKGROUND: Children born with an alveolar cleft receive bone grafts for improved function and aesthetics. The cleft area is examined radiologically before and after bone graft. Optimizing radiographic examination protocols is essential to protect these patients from possible delayed radiation injury later in life. This study investigates whether image quality of cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) exposed with an ultra-low-dose (ULD) protocol is comparable to the clinical default protocol, the standard dose (SD) protocol, in visualizing details of importance in bone grafting of alveolar clefts. METHODS: In this randomized controlled study, 72 patients with unilateral or bilateral alveolar clefts between 9 and 19 years (mean age, 9.5 years) were randomized 1:1 with either a ULD or an SD CBCT examination protocol. The CBCT scans were conducted with a Planmeca ProMax Mid scanner with an 8 × 5-cm field of view. Two experienced radiologists blindly evaluated the images and visibility of cortical bone border, trabecular bone, tooth anatomy, root development, periodontal space, and cleft width. The visibility was categorized as unacceptable, acceptable, or excellent. RESULTS: Mann-Whitney U test showed no significant differences in structure visibility between ULD and SD protocols regarding anatomical structures of interest: cortical bone border ( P = 0.07), trabecular bone ( P = 0.64), tooth anatomy ( P = 0.09), root development ( P = 0.57), periodontal space ( P = 0.38), and cleft width ( P = 0.44). CONCLUSIONS: ULD and standard CBCT protocols provide comparable image quality in terms of structure visibility in the examination of alveolar clefts. The ULD protocol is preferred to the SD protocol because of the lower radiation dose without compromising diagnostic information of CBCT images. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Diagnostic, I.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Palate , Child , Humans , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Palate/surgery , Bone Transplantation , Clinical Protocols , Cone-Beam Computed Tomography/methods
8.
Angle Orthod ; 94(1): 75-82, 2024 Jan 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37698289

OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in root development between the cleft side (CS) and noncleft side (NCS) for permanent maxillary central incisor and canine longitudinally in patients with nonsyndromic complete unilateral cleft lip and palate (cUCLP) who received secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) and to evaluate the effects of SABG on the acceleration of root development of these teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Permanent maxillary central incisors and canines of 44 subjects with nonsyndromic cUCLP who had all their cleft-related surgeries performed by the same surgeon were analyzed retrospectively from chart notes and radiographs. Panoramic and periapical radiographs at time point 1 (T1) (age, 7.55 years), at SABG (time point 2 [T2], 10.13 years), and a minimum of 2 years after SABG were studied. Root development rating scores on the NCS and CS were compared using paired t-tests and analyses of proportions. RESULTS: Mean root development score differences (NCS - CS) for canines and central incisors were greatest at T2 but diminished at time point 3 (T3). A larger proportion of teeth on the CS trailed the teeth on the NCS by at least 1 point at T2 than at T1 or T3, with the smallest proportion being observed at T3. The change in root development scores from T1 to T2 and from T2 to T3 showed relative CS acceleration from T2 to T3, indicating a catch-up of root development of cleft-adjacent teeth after SABG. CONCLUSIONS: Root development of cleft-adjacent central incisors and canines is slow in comparison with their noncleft analogs. Root development of these teeth accelerates following SABG.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Child , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Palate/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Incisor/diagnostic imaging
9.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 82(3): 288-293, 2024 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38040028

BACKGROUND: Success rates for alveolar bone grafting range from 30 to 96%. There is limited information regarding the success of repeat grafts. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to determine the radiographic success rate of repeat alveolar bone grafts. STUDY DESIGN: The study designs was a retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent repeat grafting by 1 surgeon over 15 years. To be included, subjects had to have: cleft lip and alveolus and a cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan obtained >6 months after repeat graft. Patients were excluded if CBCT was inadequate. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: Predictor variables were sex, age at repeat graft, cleft type, presence of an erupted canine, premaxillary osteotomy at time of repeat graft, presence of a visible oronasal fistula, size of bony defect, presence of a bony palatal bridge, and whether the surgeon who performed the repeat graft also performed the initial graft. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The outcome variable was graft success determined using CBCT assessment and defined as a score of >3 out of 4 in each domain: vertical bone level, labiopalatal thickness, and piriform symmetry. COVARIATES: The covariates were time from bone graft to CBCT (months) and age at time of CBCT (years). ANALYSES: Frequency distributions, relative risk with 95% confidence intervals, medians, and interquartile ranges were calculated. Pearson c2 and Fisher exact tests were performed to determine predictors of outcome. A P < .05 was considered statistically significant. RESULTS: Fifty subjects (54% male) who had repeat bone grafting to 59 cleft sites were included. Median follow-up time from repeat graft to CBCT was 7.0 months (interquartile range: 5.9 months). The radiographic success rate was 81.4%:91.7% if the same surgeon performed both initial and repeat grafts, but 78.7% if initial graft was completed by another surgeon (P = .43). CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: Despite being a multifactorial issue, extensive and bilateral clefts, the presence of an erupted tooth in the cleft area, a visible oronasal fistula, and concomitant osteotomy of the premaxilla are warning signs of the possibility of failure. Performing repeat alveolar bone grafting by an experienced surgeon appears to increase the chance of success.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Fistula , Humans , Male , Female , Alveolar Bone Grafting/methods , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Palate/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Cleft Lip/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Lip/surgery , Bone Transplantation , Treatment Outcome
10.
J Craniofac Surg ; 35(1): 199-202, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37934972

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with the management of the cleft dental gap after alveolar bone grafting. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of patients with unilateral cleft lip and alveolus or palate who had successful alveolar bone grafting. Our primary study outcome was alveolar cleft management (orthodontic closure or space maintenance). Our secondary study outcome was the rate of fixed dental rehabilitation. Univariate comparisons were made with SAS 9.4. RESULTS: The final study sample consisted of 54 patients. Most patients were treated with orthodontic closure (55.6%). Patients missing multiple teeth ( P < 0.01) were less likely to receive orthodontic closure. Orthodontic closure was not associated with differences in intermaxillary midline coincidence ( P = 0.22) or the need for LeFort advancement ( P = 0.15). Only 41.7% of patients who were managed with space maintenance obtained a fixed prosthesis. Hispanic ethnicity ( P < 0.01) and Medicaid insurance ( P < 0.01) were associated with lower rates of fixed dental rehabilitation. CONCLUSIONS: Orthodontic closure was the most common approach, and it did not result in significant maxillary midline distortion. Less than half of patients treated with space maintenance obtained fixed restorations. Socioeconomic barriers are likely preventing access to definitive dental rehabilitation in patients with unilateral cleft lip and alveolus or palate.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Cleft Lip/surgery , Cleft Lip/complications , Follow-Up Studies , Retrospective Studies , Cleft Palate/surgery , Cleft Palate/complications , Maxilla
11.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 52(1): 77-84, 2024 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37926606

During secondary alveolar cleft grafting, the use of autogenous cancellous bone harvested from the iliac crest is still considered the gold standard. Due to the risk of donor-site morbidity and excessive graft resorption, alternative grafting materials (e.g. intraoral bone, xenografts) have been tested. Autogenous tooth bone graft (ATB) is a novel material derived from extracted teeth. ATB has successfully been used in pre-prosthetic and periodontal surgery for hard-tissue reconstruction. Seven patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate were treated with ATB, using their own deciduous teeth for grafting. Defects were accessed utilizing a novel split-thickness papilla curtain flap. Cone-beam computed tomography scans were taken prior to and 3 months following cleft surgery to assess graft integration, graft stability, and the volume of the newly formed hard tissues. Hard-tissue gain, as measured at the 3-month follow-up, averaged 0.65 cm3 ± 0.26 cm3. Results showed acceptable graft integration and stability at the 3-month follow-up, with no adverse effects or excessive resorption of the graft. The use of ATB might be a feasible alternative for alveolar cleft grafting. However, long-term studies using a large sample size are required to derive further conclusions.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Cleft Palate/surgery , Cleft Lip/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Alveolar Bone Grafting/methods , Bone Transplantation/methods
12.
Orthod Craniofac Res ; 27 Suppl 1: 90-99, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38108550

The aim of this systematic review was to compare the effectiveness of pre-alveolar bonegraft (ABG) orthodontics with no orthodontic treatment for patients with non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate. All relevant studies from 1946 to October 30, 2022, were identified using several sources including The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), LILACS, Scopus, EMBASE, MEDLINE (Ovid) and EPUB ahead of publications and non-indexed citations. Randomized Controlled Trials (RCT) and Controlled Clinical Trials (CCT) were included. POPULATION: Non-syndromic complete unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate patients who have had ABG surgery. INTERVENTION: Orthodontics prior to ABG. Comparison: No orthodontic treatment prior to ABG. PRIMARY OUTCOME: Successful eruption of permanent canines. All articles were screened for the title, abstract and full text independently and in duplicate by 2 reviewers. The quality assessment of RCT was performed using Cochrane's risk of bias tool and the CCT was assessed using ROBINS-I tool. Of the 904 studies retrieved in the search, one RCT and one CCT were included. Both studies were judged as high risk of bias. The results from one study showed a statistically significant increase in bone volume and decreased bone defect post-ABG in the orthodontic treatment group. However, there was no difference with respect to other variables. Both included studies were of low quality. There is not enough evidence to recommend orthodontic treatment pre-ABG for patients with complete unilateral cleft lip, alveolus and palate. Future high-quality studies are required to inform patients and clinicians about the effectiveness of pre-graft orthodontic treatment.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Cleft Palate/surgery , Cleft Lip/surgery , Alveolar Bone Grafting/methods , Orthodontics, Corrective/methods , Treatment Outcome , Bone Transplantation/methods
13.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 52(1): 85-92, 2024 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38129189

The secondary alveolar bone grafting (SABG) step restores the continuity of the alveolar bone necessary for dentition. Faced with the complications of autografts, synthetic biomaterials such as Bioglass (BG) 45S5 have been proposed. The objective was to evaluate the success rate of SABG with the addition of BG 45S5 and to highlight the prognostic factors. Patients who underwent operation between 2015 and 2021 and had follow-up cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) were analyzed. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine factors influencing radiographic success. A total of 102 SABG were analyzed. They were unilateral total cleft lip and palate (49, 48.0%). The mean age at surgery was 9.32 ± 3.09 years. Surgeries were performed mainly outside a syndromic context and without a family history after orthodontic preparation. The radiographic success rate at 1 year was 80.4%. Mixed dentition stage (odds ratio [OR] = 7.3, p = 0.024), absence of syndromic context (OR = 20.7, p = 0.024) and female sex (OR = 4.88, p = 0.021) were factors predictive of surgical success. The use of BG 45S5 instead of autograft is relevant for SABG, with a 1-year success rate of over 80%. The stage of mixed dentition, the absence of syndromic context, and female sex were factors for good prognosis.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Ceramics , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Glass , Humans , Female , Child , Cleft Lip/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Cleft Palate/surgery , Alveolar Bone Grafting/methods , Bone Transplantation/methods
14.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 51(10): 644-648, 2023 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37813773

This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the outcomes of alveolar cleft osteoplasty using single-shot antibiotic prophylaxis versus a prolonged antibiotic regimen. The primary endpoints assessed were the incidence of infection, failure of surgical correction, and antibiotic-related side effects. Patients with orofacial clefts affecting the alveolar ridge who underwent alveolar cleft osteoplasty at a tertiary care center between 2015 and 2021 were included. The prolonged antibiotic group received extended antibiotic treatment, while the single-shot group received preoperative antibiotics only. Among 83 patients (mean age 12.8 years), 51 interventions were performed under prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis (mean duration 5.82 days) whereas in 40 interventions only single-shot prophylaxis was administered. There were no significant differences in infection frequency, surgical correction failure, implant loss, or adverse events between the groups. However, after single-shot antibiotic regimen, patients had significantly shorter hospital stays, being discharged on average one day earlier. The study suggests that single-shot antibiotic prophylaxis does not have drawbacks compared to prolonged antibiotic treatment in alveolar cleft osteoplasty. Considering increasing antibiotic resistance and potential side effects, omitting prolonged antibiotic prophylaxis is recommended for patients undergoing alveolar cleft osteoplasty.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Child , Cleft Palate/surgery , Cleft Lip/surgery , Antibiotic Prophylaxis , Retrospective Studies , Follow-Up Studies , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Bone Transplantation
15.
Clin Oral Investig ; 27(11): 6667-6675, 2023 Nov.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37794139

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the bone density and volume in patients with alveolar cleft reconstructions utilizing bone marrow aspirate concentrate with iliac graft versus iliac graft alone. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Thirty-six patients with unilateral alveolar cleft were randomly allocated into either an intervention group receiving an iliac bone graft mixed with bone marrow concentrate or a control group receiving an iliac bone graft. Cone beam CT was obtained preoperative, 6 and 12 months postoperatively to assess the bone density of the graft and bone volume of the alveolar defect, and then, the bone loss ratio was calculated. RESULTS: Bone volume and bone density demonstrated a statistically significant increase in the intervention group at 6 and 12 months. In contrast, the bone loss ratio decreased significantly in the intervention group throughout the follow-up period. CONCLUSION: A combination of bone marrow concentrate and iliac cancellous bone in alveolar cleft reconstruction may improve bone densities and volume in addition to decreasing graft loss rate. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: Using of bone marrow aspirate concentrate will decrease the amount of the graft needed and decrease the ratio of bone loss at the grafted site by the time. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.org ( NCT04414423 ) 4/6/2020.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Cancellous Bone , Bone Marrow , Cleft Palate/surgery , Bone Transplantation , Ilium/transplantation , Cleft Lip/surgery
16.
J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg ; 86: 58-64, 2023 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37703598

BACKGROUND: To enhance the success rate of alveolar bone grafting, it is crucial to identify the factors that may influence the postoperative bone formation. This study aimed to investigate the impact of various osseous structure characteristics of alveolar clefts on the survival ratio of autogenous cancellous bone particle grafts. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on 60 patients who underwent surgery performed by the same surgeon between 2016 and 2022. Two researchers measured and recorded the bone defect volume (DV), postoperative bone formation volume at 1 year, contact area between the graft and the bone surface within the cleft (S), cleft width (CW), osseous occlusion relationships, and presence of a cleft palate and initial bone bridge within the cleft for each patient. Pearson correlation analysis, Spearman's correlation analysis, and multiple linear regression analysis were performed. RESULTS: The analysis results revealed statistical correlations between DV, CW, ratio of S to DV, cleft palate, initial bone bridge presence, and occlusion relationships with the survival rate. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that initial bone bridge and occlusion relationships affected the graft survival rate. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the presence of initial bone bridges and occlusions, we can make a rough estimate of the postoperative bone formation outcome in patients. However, the underlying mechanisms by which these two factors influence the bone formation require further investigation. In addition, preoperative orthodontic treatment to improve occlusal relationships may improve the postoperative bone formation outcomes in alveolar bone grafting.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Palate/surgery , Alveolar Bone Grafting/methods , Retrospective Studies , Cleft Lip/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Lip/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Bone Transplantation/methods
17.
RFO UPF ; 27(1)08 ago. 2023. tab, ilus
Article Pt | LILACS, BBO | ID: biblio-1511050

Objetivo: revisar a literatura sobre os diferentes tipos de derivados de plaquetas autólogas e o desempenho clínico do uso do sticky bone para aumento ósseo horizontal de rebordo. Materiais e métodos: Para realização dessa revisão foram realizadas buscas nas bases de dados PubMed, Google Scholar e Web of Science, utilizando os seguintes descritores: "platelet-rich fibrin" AND "sticky bone" OR "alveolar bone grafting" AND "sticky bone" OR "guided bone regeneration" AND "sticky bone" AND "alveolar ridge augmentation" OR "Alveolar ridge augmentation" AND "sticky bone". Foram incluídos artigos publicados em inglês, que abordavam conceitos relacionados aos agregados plaquetários e a regeneração óssea guiada para aumento ósseo horizontal de rebordo utilizando fibrina rica em plaquetas associada à enxertos ósseos (sticky bone). Resultados: Após avaliação dos estudos encontrados foram selecionados 11 artigos sobre o uso do sticky bone para aumento horizontal de rebordo. Para compor este trabalho foram selecionados também 14 estudos de revisão e artigos associados ao tema. Por ser de fácil aplicação e obtenção, muitos autores têm estudado as aplicações cirúrgicas do sticky bone e os resultados demonstram que o aumento horizontal do rebordo utilizando essa técnica pode ser realizado de forma previsível. Conclusão: apesar de haver estudos promissores sobre o uso do sticky bone, falta evidência na literatura sobre seu sucesso clínico. Assim, para compreender o potencial regenerativo desta técnica são necessários um maior número de estudos randomizados, com diferentes materiais de enxerto e protocolos padronizados de obtenção do sticky bone.(AU)


Objective: to review the literature on the different types of autologous platelet derivatives and the clinical performance of using sticky bone for horizontal bone ridge augmentation. Materials and methods: In order to conduct this review, it was conducted searches in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases using the following descriptors: "platelet-rich fibrin" AND "sticky bone" OR "alveolar bone grafting" AND "sticky bone" OR "guided bone regeneration" AND "sticky bone" AND "alveolar ridge augmentation" OR "Alveolar ridge augmentation" AND "sticky bone". It included articles published in English that addressed concepts related to platelet aggregates and guided bone regeneration for horizontal bone augmentation using platelet-rich fibrin associated with bone grafts (sticky bone). Results: After evaluating the studies found, were selected 11 articles on the use of sticky bone for horizontal ridge augmentation. To compose this work, 14 review studies and articles associated with the topic were also selected. Due to its ease of application and availability, many authors have explored the surgical applications of sticky bone, and the results indicate that horizontal ridge augmentation using this technique can be predictably performed. Conclusion: while there are promising studies on the use of sticky bone, the literature lacks evidence regarding its clinical success. Therefore, to fully understand the regenerative potential of this technique, further randomized studies are needed, involving different graft materials and standardized protocols for obtaining sticky bone.(AU)


Humans , Guided Tissue Regeneration/methods , Alveolar Ridge Augmentation/methods , Alveolar Bone Grafting/methods , Platelet-Rich Fibrin , Bone Regeneration/physiology
18.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg ; 81(10): 1286-1294, 2023 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37500060

BACKGROUND: Patients with unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) undergo alveolar bone grafting (ABG) to unite the bony segments before eruption of the maxillary permanent canine. PURPOSE: This study assessed the frequency of canine impaction after ABG in the UCLP patient population and identified associated demographic, anatomical, and operative factors. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This retrospective cohort study included 257 patients with UCLP who received ABG surgery at a single craniofacial center. PREDICTOR VARIABLES: The variables were cleft characteristics, pre-ABG procedures, operative factors, and dental anomalies identified through electronic health records, radiographs, and intraoral photographs taken before ABG and at least 2 years after ABG. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLE: The primary outcome variable was the presence of an impacted maxillary canine, defined as malposition of a fully developed canine following ABG with full eruption of the contralateral canine. ANALYSES: The t tests, χ2 tests, and logistic regression analysis were used to evaluate frequency of canine impaction and test for associations with the predictor variables. RESULTS: Of 257 patients, 56% were male with a mean age of 9.2 years at the time of ABG. The frequency of canine impaction was 27% (n = 69, 95% confidence interval 22 to 33%). Significant associations were found for: complete clefts (30 vs 12%, P = .017), hypodivergent facial patterns (low angle: 46%; high angle: 29 vs 22% normal angle, P = .042), females (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 2.1, P = .015), early grafting with less than 1/3 developed canine root (aOR = 3.36, P = .024), pregraft extraction of primary canine (aOR = 2.3, P = .009) and greater permanent canine angulation (odds ratio = 1.1, P < .0001). No significant associations with pregraft orthodontic expansion or regrafting were detected. CONCLUSION AND RELEVANCE: In this study, about one in four patients with UCLP had an impacted canine. Multiple factors including pregraft extraction of the primary canine and increased canine angulation were associated with impaction of the permanent canine.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Tooth, Impacted , Female , Humans , Male , Child , Cleft Lip/surgery , Alveolar Bone Grafting/methods , Cleft Palate/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Tooth, Impacted/surgery , Tooth, Impacted/complications
19.
Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi ; 41(3): 284-289, 2023 Jun 01.
Article En, Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37277794

OBJECTIVES: To review the effectiveness of secondary alveolar bone grafting using iliac cancellous bone in patients with unilateral complete alveolar cleft and to investigate the factors influencing it. METHODS: A retrospective study of 160 patients with unilateral complete alveolar clefts who underwent iliac cancellous bone graft repair at the Department of Cleft Lip and Palate Surgery, West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, was conducted. Eighty patients in the young age group (6-12 years) and 80 in the old age group (≥13 years) were included. Bone bridge formation was determined using Mimics software, and the volume was measured to calculate the iliac implantation rate, residual bone filling rate, and resorption rate. The factors that affected bone grafting in both subgroups were investigated. RESULTS: Using bone bridge formation as the clinical success criterion, the success rate for the entire population was 71.25%, with a significant difference of 78.75% and 63.75% for the young and old age groups, respectively (P=0.036). The gap volume in the latter was significantly larger than that in the former (P<0.001). The factors that influenced bone grafting in the young group were the palatal bone wall (P=0.006) and history of cleft palate surgery (P=0.012), but only the palatal bone wall affected the outcome in the old age group (P=0.036). CONCLUSIONS: The results of alveolar bone grafting for the old age group were worse than those for the young age group. The palatal bone wall was an important factor that affected alveolar bone grafting, and alveolar bone grafting in the young patients was influenced by the history of cleft palate surgery.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Child , Adolescent , Cleft Palate/surgery , Cleft Lip/surgery , Retrospective Studies , Cancellous Bone , Treatment Outcome , Alveolar Bone Grafting/methods , Bone Transplantation/methods
20.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37321928

OBJECTIVE: For alveolar bone grafting (ABG), we have been performing surgery using a technique in which a cortical bone lining iliac endplate is applied to the anterior nasal aperture inferior margin. Herein, we used conventional and cortical bone lining techniques to examine the postoperative bone-bridge morphology after ABG. STUDY DESIGN: Fifty-five unilateral patients who underwent ABG at our clinic from October 2012 to March 2019 were included. We used postoperative CT data to compare the labiolingual width of the grafted bone and anterior-posterior and vertical shapes of the nasal aperture inferior margin with respect to the ungrafted side. RESULTS: The cortical bone lining technique was superior to the conventional method. The cortical bone lining technique showed good results regardless of alveolar cleft width or oral-nasal fistula. Also, tooth movement into the grafted area was involved in maintaining the residual graft bone; however, the cortical bone lining technique had better results. CONCLUSIONS: The cortical bone lining technique allows for the physical closure of nasolateral mucosal fistulas when it is technically difficult, and it can apply sufficient pressure to the bone marrow cancellous bone filling over the cortical plate bone. Our results illustrate the effectiveness of the cortical bone lining technique.


Alveolar Bone Grafting , Cleft Lip , Cleft Palate , Humans , Cleft Lip/surgery , Treatment Outcome , Cleft Palate/diagnostic imaging , Cleft Palate/surgery , Cortical Bone/surgery , Bone Transplantation/methods
...