RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Australian literature supports nurse-initiated opioid analgesia protocols may be effective, but this practice is not yet widely adopted in Canada. LOCAL PROBLEM: Previous quality audits of Emergency Departments (EDs) in Victoria (Canada) indicate long delays to administration of analgesia. METHODS: Two tertiary care hospitals in a Canadian city of approximately 400,000 people were chosen for a quality improvement initiative. A manual retrospective chart review was conducted on a total of 122 patients which was compared to data from 125 patients from a previous audit in 2019. INTERVENTIONS: ED nursing staff both hospitals were provided education and daily reminders to document pain score at triage, and to flag an acute analgesia opioid order set on the charts of patients with moderate or severe pain (greater than 4 out of 10 in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) or by triage nurse's clinical judgment). At Victoria General Hospital (VGH), nurses had the option of finding an emergency physician (EP) to sign the acute analgesia opioid order set, or independently administer IV opioids from a presigned order set without consulting an EP. At Royal Jubilee Hospital (RJH), nursing staff could only administer IV opioids from the order set after an EP was consulted. Median time to opioid analgesia after the intervention was compared to 2019 data for each hospital. RESULTS: Each hospital significantly reduced median time to administration of opioids: VGH achieved 45.6 % reduction (1 h 8 min improvement, p = 0.001) and RJH achieved a 62.5 % reduction (2 h 11 min improvement, p < 0.001). Secondary outcomes indicated patients may receive analgesia faster when the opioid protocol was nurse initiated (median 43 minutes) vs physician initiated (median 1 h 1 min) at VGH. Pain score documentation at triage improved from <10 % in 2019 to >50 % in 2020 at both sites. Approximately 95 % of EP and nursing staff thought nurse-initiated opioids are safe, effective, and should be supported by regulatory boards. CONCLUSION: Implementing a new triage protocol to expedite initiation of an analgesic protocol was associated with significantly reduced time to analgesia for patients with moderate to severe pain. Time reductions may be greater with nurse-initiated analgesia before physician assessment.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Manejo del Dolor , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Analgesia/métodos , Analgesia/enfermería , Analgesia/normas , Analgesia/estadística & datos numéricos , Canadá , Victoria , Triaje/normas , Triaje/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Pain, more frequently due to musculoskeletal injuries, is a prevalent concern in emergency departments (EDs). Timely analgesic administration is paramount in the acute setting of ED. Despite its importance, many EDs face challenges in pain management and present opportunities for improvement. This initiative aimed to expedite the administration of the first analgesic in patients with musculoskeletal pain in the ED. LOCAL PROBLEM: Observations within our ED revealed that patients with musculoskeletal injuries triaged to yellow or green areas experienced prolonged waiting times, leading to delayed analgesic administration, thereby adversely affecting clinical care and patient satisfaction. SPECIFIC AIM: The aim of our quality improvement (QI) project was to reduce the time to administration of first analgesia by 30% from baseline, in patients with musculoskeletal injuries presenting to our academic ED, in a period of 8 weeks after the baseline phase. METHODS: A multidisciplinary QI team systematically applied Point-of-Care Quality Improvement and Plan-Do-Study-Act (PDSA) cycle methodologies. Process mapping and fishbone analyses identified the challenges in analgesia administration. Targeted interventions were iteratively refined through PDSA cycles. INTERVENTIONS: Interventions such as pain score documentation at triage, fast-tracking of patients with moderate-to-severe pain, resident awareness sessions, a pain management protocol and prescription audits were executed during the PDSA cycles. Successful elements were reinforced and adjustments were made to address the identified challenges. RESULTS: The median door-to-analgesia timing during the baseline phase was 55.5 min (IQR, 25.75-108 min). During the postintervention phase, the median was significantly reduced to 15 min (IQR, 5-37 min), exceeding the anticipated outcomes and indicating a substantial 73% reduction (p value <0.001) from baseline. CONCLUSION: Implementing simple change ideas resulted in a substantial improvement in door-to-analgesia timing within the ED. These findings significantly contribute to ongoing discussions on the optimisation of pain management in emergency care.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Manejo del Dolor , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Humanos , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , India , Femenino , Masculino , Tiempo de Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Tratamiento/normas , Adulto , Analgesia/métodos , Analgesia/normas , Analgesia/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Musculoesquelético/terapia , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de TiempoAsunto(s)
Analgesia , Terapias Complementarias , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Dolor , Estudios Transversales , Analgesia/normas , Analgesia/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapias Complementarias/normas , Terapias Complementarias/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Dolor/prevención & control , Queensland , Resultado del Tratamiento , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the effectiveness of virtual reality (VR) in alleviating pain and improving the experience of burn patients during wound care and physical therapy. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Database, and the Web of Science. REVIEW/ANALYSIS METHODS: We searched four electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from the earliest available date up to March 1, 2022. The primary outcome was worst pain intensity, while secondary outcomes encompassed pain unpleasantness intensity, time spent thinking about pain, and fun experience intensity. Risk of bias was evaluated using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool. RESULTS: This study included 21 trials. The combined data revealed that the VR group experienced a significant reduction in worst pain intensity, pain unpleasantness intensity, and time spent thinking about pain compared to the control group. Moreover, VR treatment was associated with a significant increase in the fun experience intensity. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: Virtual reality has the potential value of auxiliary analgesia in burn care, and exploring a more perfect scheme of VR-assisted analgesia is worthwhile. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this meta-analysis indicate that VR can effectively reduce worst pain intensity, pain unpleasantness intensity, and time spent thinking about pain during wound care and physical therapy for burn patients. Additionally, it enhances fun experience intensity of the treatment period. Therefore, VR shows promise as a valuable complementary pain management intervention for burn patients.
Asunto(s)
Quemaduras , Manejo del Dolor , Realidad Virtual , Humanos , Quemaduras/terapia , Quemaduras/complicaciones , Quemaduras/psicología , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/normas , Analgesia/métodos , Analgesia/normas , Dimensión del Dolor/métodosRESUMEN
La hernia diafragmática congénita es un defecto en el diafragma que lleva a la herniación del contenido abdominal a la cavidad torácica durante el período intrauterino. La morbimortalidad está determinada por la asociación con otras malformaciones, el grado de hipoplasia pulmonar y la presencia de hipertensión pulmonar secundaria. Presenta una incidencia estimada de 1 cada 2.500-3.000 recién nacidos vivos, constituyendo en un 60% una malformación aislada. Es una patología evolutiva que puede ser diagnosticada a partir de la semana 20-24, la ubicación más habitual es la posterolateral izquierda. Se trata de una patología que requiere ingreso a cuidados intensivos al nacimiento y luego de lograda la estabilización del paciente es de sanción quirúrgica. Los objetivos de este trabajo son conocer las características generales de la patología para sistematizar el manejo logrando así un óptimo asesoramiento de los padres a nivel prenatal y seguimiento postnatal del recién nacido.
Congenital diaphragmatic hernia is a defect in the diaphragm that leads to herniation of theabdominal contents of the thoracic cavity during the intrauterine period. Morbidity and mortality are determined by the association with other malformations, the degree ofpulmonary hypoplasia and the presence of secondary pulmonary hypertension.It has an estimated incidence of 1 every 2,500-3,000 live newborns, and in 60% of the cases it is an isolated malformation. It is an evolutionary pathology that can be diagnosed from week 20-24; it is most commonly located in the left posterolateral. It is a pathology that requires intensive care at birth and after delivery and once the patient has been stabilized, surgical action is required. The objectives of this work are to understand the general characteristics of the pathology in order to refine its manipulation and achieve optimal counseling for parents at the newborn's prenatal and postnatal stages.
A hérnia diafragmática congênita é um defeito no diafragma que leva à herniação doconteúdo abdominal para a cavidade torácica durante o período intrauterino. A morbimortalidade é determinada pela associação com outras malformações, pelo grau de hipoplasia pulmonar e pela presença de hipertensão pulmonar secundária. Apresenta uma incidência estimada de 1 a cada 2.500-3.000 nascidos vivos, constituindo-se em 60% uma malformação isolada. É uma patologia evolutiva que pode ser diagnosticada a partir da semana 20-24 e a localização mais comum é o póstero-lateral esquerdo. É uma patologia que requer internação em terapia intensiva ao nascimento e após o parto. Uma vez que o paciente for estabilizado, é necessária ação cirúrgica. Os objetivos deste paper são conhecer as características gerais da patologia para melhorar o seu manejo, obtendo assim um aconselhamento ideal para os pais no nível pré-natal e no acompanhamento do crescimento pós-natal do recém-nascido.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Recién Nacido , Atención Posnatal/normas , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/terapia , Periodo Posoperatorio , Diagnóstico Prenatal/normas , Pronóstico , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Transferencia de Pacientes/normas , Cuidados Críticos/normas , Periodo Preoperatorio , Hernias Diafragmáticas Congénitas/cirugía , Analgesia/normas , Hipertensión Pulmonar/terapia , Monitoreo Fisiológico/normasAsunto(s)
Analgesia/métodos , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/epidemiología , Analgesia/normas , Animales , Humanos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/prevención & controlRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To propose agile strategies for a comprehensive approach to analgesia, sedation, delirium, early mobility and family engagement for patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome, considering the high risk of infection among health workers, the humanitarian treatment that we must provide to patients and the inclusion of patients' families, in a context lacking specific therapeutic strategies against the virus globally available to date and a potential lack of health resources. METHODS: A nonsystematic review of the scientific evidence in the main bibliographic databases was carried out, together with national and international clinical experience and judgment. Finally, a consensus of recommendations was made among the members of the Committee for Analgesia, Sedation and Delirium of the Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva. RESULTS: Recommendations were agreed upon, and tools were developed to ensure a comprehensive approach to analgesia, sedation, delirium, early mobility and family engagement for adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19. DISCUSSION: Given the new order generated in intensive therapies due to the advancing COVID-19 pandemic, we propose to not leave aside the usual good practices but to adapt them to the particular context generated. Our consensus is supported by scientific evidence and national and international experience and will be an attractive consultation tool in intensive therapies.
OBJETIVO: Proponer estrategias agile para este abordaje integral de la analgesia, sedación, delirium, implementación de movilidad temprana e inclusión familiar del paciente con síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda por COVID-19, considerando el alto riesgo de infección que existe entre los trabajadores de salud, el tratamiento humanitario que debemos brindar al paciente y su familia, en un contexto de falta estrategias terapéuticas específicas contra el virus globalmente disponibles a la fecha y una potencial falta de recursos sanitarios. METODOS: Se llevó a cabo una revision no sistemática de la evidencia científica en las principales bases de datos bibliográficos, sumada a la experiencia y juicio clínico nacional e internacional. Finalmente, se realizó un consenso de recomendaciones entre los integrantes del Comité de Analgesia, Sedación y Delirium de la Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva. RESULTADOS: Se acordaron recomendaciones y se desarrollaron herramientas para asegurar un abordaje integral de analgesia, sedación, delirium, implementación de movilidad temprana e inclusión familiar del paciente adulto con síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda por COVID-19. DISCUSIÓN: Ante el nuevo orden generado en las terapias intensivas por la progresión de la pandemia de COVID-19, proponemos no dejar atrás las buenas prácticas habituales, sino adaptarlas al contexto particular generado. Nuestro consenso está respaldado en la evidencia científica, la experiencia nacional e internacional, y será una herramienta de consulta atractiva en las terapias intensivas.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia/normas , COVID-19/complicaciones , Consenso , Delirio/terapia , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Analgesia/métodos , Analgésicos/administración & dosificación , Lista de Verificación , Delirio/diagnóstico , Ambulación Precoz , Familia , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodos , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/métodos , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/normas , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Dimensión del Dolor/normas , Agitación Psicomotora/terapia , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Acute pain is a common reason for emergency department (ED) attendance. Royal College of Emergency Medicine (RCEM) pain management audits have shown national variation and room for improvement. Previous evidence suggests that children receive less satisfactory pain management than adults. METHODS: Prescription of analgesia in emergency medicine is a cross-sectional observational study of consecutive patients presenting to 12 National Health Service EDs with an isolated long bone fracture and/or dislocation, and was carried out between 2015 and 2017. Using the recommendations in the RCEM Best Practice Guidelines, pain management in ED was assessed for differences of age (adults vs children) and hospital type (children's vs all patients). RESULTS: From the total 8346 patients, 38% were children (median age 8 years). There was better adherence to the RCEM guidance for children than adults (24% (766/3196) vs 11% (579/5123)) for the combined outcome of timely assessment, pain score and appropriate analgesia. In addition, children were significantly more likely than adults to receive analgesia appropriate to the pain score (of those with a recorded pain score 67% (1168/1744) vs 52% (1238/2361)). Children's hospitals performed much better across all reported outcomes compared with general hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies, children with a limb fracture/dislocation are more likely than adults to have a pain score documented and to receive appropriate analgesia. Unexpectedly, children's EDs performed better than general EDs in relation to timely and appropriate analgesia but the reasons for this are not apparent from the present study.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia/normas , Extremidades/lesiones , Fracturas Óseas/tratamiento farmacológico , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgesia/métodos , Analgesia/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Estudios Transversales , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/organización & administración , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Dimensión del Dolor/métodos , Medicina EstatalRESUMEN
RESUMEN Objetivo: Proponer estrategias agile para este abordaje integral de la analgesia, sedación, delirium, implementación de movilidad temprana e inclusión familiar del paciente con síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda por COVID-19, considerando el alto riesgo de infección que existe entre los trabajadores de salud, el tratamiento humanitario que debemos brindar al paciente y su familia, en un contexto de falta estrategias terapéuticas específicas contra el virus globalmente disponibles a la fecha y una potencial falta de recursos sanitarios. Metodos: Se llevó a cabo una revision no sistemática de la evidencia científica en las principales bases de datos bibliográficos, sumada a la experiencia y juicio clínico nacional e internacional. Finalmente, se realizó un consenso de recomendaciones entre los integrantes del Comité de Analgesia, Sedación y Delirium de la Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva. Resultados: Se acordaron recomendaciones y se desarrollaron herramientas para asegurar un abordaje integral de analgesia, sedación, delirium, implementación de movilidad temprana e inclusión familiar del paciente adulto con síndrome de dificultad respiratoria aguda por COVID-19. Discusión: Ante el nuevo orden generado en las terapias intensivas por la progresión de la pandemia de COVID-19, proponemos no dejar atrás las buenas prácticas habituales, sino adaptarlas al contexto particular generado. Nuestro consenso está respaldado en la evidencia científica, la experiencia nacional e internacional, y será una herramienta de consulta atractiva en las terapias intensivas.
ABSTRACT Objective: To propose agile strategies for a comprehensive approach to analgesia, sedation, delirium, early mobility and family engagement for patients with COVID-19-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome, considering the high risk of infection among health workers, the humanitarian treatment that we must provide to patients and the inclusion of patients' families, in a context lacking specific therapeutic strategies against the virus globally available to date and a potential lack of health resources. Methods: A nonsystematic review of the scientific evidence in the main bibliographic databases was carried out, together with national and international clinical experience and judgment. Finally, a consensus of recommendations was made among the members of the Committee for Analgesia, Sedation and Delirium of the Sociedad Argentina de Terapia Intensiva. Results: Recommendations were agreed upon, and tools were developed to ensure a comprehensive approach to analgesia, sedation, delirium, early mobility and family engagement for adult patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19. Discussion: Given the new order generated in intensive therapies due to the advancing COVID-19 pandemic, we propose to not leave aside the usual good practices but to adapt them to the particular context generated. Our consensus is supported by scientific evidence and national and international experience and will be an attractive consultation tool in intensive therapies.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria del Recién Nacido/terapia , Delirio/terapia , Consenso , Manejo del Dolor/normas , COVID-19/complicaciones , Analgesia/normas , Agitación Psicomotora/terapia , Bloqueo Neuromuscular/métodos , Delirio/diagnóstico , Ambulación Precoz , Lista de Verificación , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , COVID-19/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgesia/métodos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Intubación Intratraqueal/métodosRESUMEN
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS) is one of the most demanding conditions in an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). Management of analgesia and sedation in ARDS is particularly challenging. An expert panel was convened to produce a "state-of-the-art" article to support clinicians in the optimal management of analgesia/sedation in mechanically ventilated adults with ARDS, including those with COVID-19. Current ICU analgesia/sedation guidelines promote analgesia first and minimization of sedation, wakefulness, delirium prevention and early rehabilitation to facilitate ventilator and ICU liberation. However, these strategies cannot always be applied to patients with ARDS who sometimes require deep sedation and/or paralysis. Patients with severe ARDS may be under-represented in analgesia/sedation studies and currently recommended strategies may not be feasible. With lightened sedation, distress-related symptoms (e.g., pain and discomfort, anxiety, dyspnea) and patient-ventilator asynchrony should be systematically assessed and managed through interprofessional collaboration, prioritizing analgesia and anxiolysis. Adaptation of ventilator settings (e.g., use of a pressure-set mode, spontaneous breathing, sensitive inspiratory trigger) should be systematically considered before additional medications are administered. Managing the mechanical ventilator is of paramount importance to avoid the unnecessary use of deep sedation and/or paralysis. Therefore, applying an "ABCDEF-R" bundle (R = Respiratory-drive-control) may be beneficial in ARDS patients. Further studies are needed, especially regarding the use and long-term effects of fast-offset drugs (e.g., remifentanil, volatile anesthetics) and the electrophysiological assessment of analgesia/sedation (e.g., electroencephalogram devices, heart-rate variability, and video pupillometry). This review is particularly relevant during the COVID-19 pandemic given drug shortages and limited ICU-bed capacity.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia/normas , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/tratamiento farmacológico , Analgesia/métodos , Guías como Asunto , Humanos , Manejo del Dolor/métodosRESUMEN
There is paucity of data on the impact of surgical incision and analgesia on relevant outcomes.A retrospective STROBE-compliant cohort study was performed between July 2007 and August 2017 of patients undergoing lung transplantation. Gender, age, indication for lung transplantation, and the 3 types of surgical access (Thoracotomy (T), Sternotomy (S), and Clamshell (C)) were used, as well as 2 analgesic techniques: epidural and intravenous opioids. Outcome variables were: pain scores; postoperative hemorrhage in the first 24âhours, duration of mechanical ventilation, and length of stay at intensive care unit (ICU).Three hundred forty-one patients were identified. Thoracotomy was associated with higher pain scores than Sternotomy (OR 1.66, 95% CI: 1.01; 2.74, P: .045) and no differences were found between Clamshell and Sternotomy incision. The median blood loss was 800 mL [interquartile range (IQR): 500; 1238], thoracotomy patients had 500 mL [325; 818] (Pâ<â.001). Median durations of mechanical ventilation in Thoracotomy, Sternotomy, and Clamshell groups were 19 [11; 37] hours, 34 [IQR 16; 57.5] hours, and 27 [IQR 15; 50.5] hours respectively. Thoracotomy group were discharged earlier from ICU (Pâ<â.001).Thoracotomy access produces less postoperative hemorrhage, duration of mechanical ventilation, and lower length of stay in ICU, but higher pain scores and need for epidural analgesia.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia/normas , Trasplante de Pulmón/métodos , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Esternotomía/efectos adversos , Toracotomía/efectos adversos , Administración Intravenosa/normas , Administración Intravenosa/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Analgesia/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgesia Epidural/normas , Analgesia Epidural/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Trasplante de Pulmón/normas , Trasplante de Pulmón/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadísticas no Paramétricas , Esternotomía/métodos , Esternotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Toracotomía/métodos , Toracotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The opioid epidemic has been influenced in part by physician overprescribing. Several studies have evaluated opioid use after urogynecologic surgery, with limited data on postoperative guidelines. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of implementing a multimodal, opioid-sparing analgesia regimen on opioid use, patient satisfaction, and refill rates. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study of female patients undergoing urogynecologic surgery at an academic center from 2017 to 2019, before and after introduction of an opioid-sparing multimodal regimen protocol advocating for standing ibuprofen and acetaminophen. Demographic information, opioid prescription details (oral morphine equivalent [OME]), and refill rate data were collected from the chart. Postoperative opioid use and satisfaction score (for the after group using Likert scale) was obtained by telephone survey. t Test was used to compare continuous variables, and χ2/Fischer exact test was used to compare categorical variables. RESULTS: Two hundred ninety-two patients were eligible and contacted. One hundred one patients responded before protocol implementation and 102 responded after protocol implementation. The median number of tablets prescribed was 14.5 (108.5 OME; IQR, 10) and 10 (75 OME; IQR, 5; P < 0.01) preprotocol and postprotocol, whereas the mean number of tablets used was 10 (75 OME; IQR, 13) and 3 (22.5 OME; IQR, 10; P = 0.0009) preprotocol and postprotocol, respectively. Refill rate did not differ significantly (11% preprotocol vs 7% postprotocol P = 0.32) Mean satisfaction score was 4.3 (SD, 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: A multimodal analgesia regimen limiting postoperative opioids decreased postoperative opioid prescribing and consumption while maintaining similar patient satisfaction and refill rates.
Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Protocolos Clínicos/normas , Prescripciones de Medicamentos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos , Dolor Postoperatorio , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos , Acetaminofén/uso terapéutico , Analgesia/métodos , Analgesia/normas , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Terapia Combinada , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/normas , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/métodos , Humanos , Ibuprofeno/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , New York/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Satisfacción del Paciente , Estudios Retrospectivos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos/métodosRESUMEN
Human infection with Angiostrongyloides cantonensis, or rat lungworm disease, manifests most commonly with neurologic symptoms that often include severe diffuse pain. While pain is reported by the majority of patients with rat lungworm disease, there are presently no published guidelines on the approach to pain management for these patients. Here we report a case of rat lungworm disease where severe refractory pain was the most prominent symptom and an intravenous lidocaine infusion was used as a successful treatment modality. Intravenous lidocaine has been shown to be safe and effective in neuropathic pain, refractory cancer pain, and peri-operative pain management. To our knowledge, this is the first case report on the use of lidocaine infusion for the management of refractory pain from rat lungworm disease, and among the first reports of any approach, to pain management for rat lungworm disease. We suggest that a lidocaine infusion protocol be considered when pain from rat lungworm disease fails to respond to first-line analgesics.
Asunto(s)
Infusiones Intravenosas/normas , Lidocaína/administración & dosificación , Dolor Intratable/tratamiento farmacológico , Infecciones por Strongylida/complicaciones , Adulto , Analgesia/métodos , Analgesia/normas , Analgesia/estadística & datos numéricos , Angiostrongylus cantonensis/efectos de los fármacos , Angiostrongylus cantonensis/patogenicidad , Animales , Hawaii , Humanos , Infusiones Intravenosas/métodos , Infusiones Intravenosas/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Manejo del Dolor/normas , Manejo del Dolor/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones por Strongylida/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is an opioid epidemic in the United States. With the increased concern of over-prescribing opioids, physicians are seeking alternative pain management strategies. The purpose of this study is to review the impact of instituting a multimodal analgesia (MMA) guideline on decreasing opioid use in trauma patients at a Level 1 trauma center. METHODS: In 2017, an MMA guideline was developed and included anti-inflammatories, muscle relaxants, neuropathic agents, and local analgesics in addition to opioids. Staff were educated and the guideline was implemented. A retrospective review of medications prescribed to patients admitted from 2016 through 2018 was performed. Patients admitted in 2016 served as the control group (before MMA). In 2018, all patients received multimodal pain therapy as standard practice, and served as the comparison group. RESULTS: A total of 10 340 patients were admitted to the trauma service from 2016 through 2018. There were 3013 and 3249 patients for review in 2016 and 2018, respectively. Total morphine milligram equivalents were 2 402 329 and 1 975 935 in 2016 and 2018, respectively, a 17.7% decrease (P < .001). Concurrently, there was a statistically significant increase in the use of multimodal pain medications. A secondary endpoint was studied to evaluate for changes in acute kidney injury; there was not a statistically significant increase (0.56% versus 0.68%, P = .55). DISCUSSION: Implementation of an MMA guideline significantly reduced opioid use in trauma patients. The use of nonopioid MMA medications increased without an increased incidence of acute kidney injury.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia/métodos , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Utilización de Medicamentos/tendencias , Prescripción Inadecuada/prevención & control , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Heridas y Lesiones/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Analgesia/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Prescripción Inadecuada/tendencias , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
Practice guidelines provide clear evidence-based recommendations for the use of drug therapy to manage pain, agitation, and delirium associated with critical illness. Dosing recommendations however are often based on strategies used in patients with normal body habitus. Recommendations specific to critically ill patients with extreme obesity are lacking. Nonetheless, clinicians must craft dosing regimens for this population. This paper is intended to help clinicians design initial dosing regimens for medications commonly used in the management of pain, agitation, and delirium in critically ill patients with extreme obesity. A detailed literature search was conducted with an emphasis on obesity, pharmacokinetics, and dosing. Relevant manuscripts were reviewed and strategies for dosing are provided.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia/normas , Sedación Profunda/normas , Delirio/etiología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Obesidad/fisiopatología , Analgesia/métodos , Analgesia/estadística & datos numéricos , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos no Narcóticos/uso terapéutico , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Benzodiazepinas/administración & dosificación , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Enfermedad Crítica/terapia , Sedación Profunda/métodos , Sedación Profunda/estadística & datos numéricos , Dexmedetomidina/administración & dosificación , Dexmedetomidina/uso terapéutico , Etomidato/administración & dosificación , Etomidato/uso terapéutico , Haloperidol/administración & dosificación , Haloperidol/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Ketamina/administración & dosificación , Ketamina/uso terapéutico , Obesidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Fumarato de Quetiapina/administración & dosificación , Fumarato de Quetiapina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
This CIRSE Standards of Practice document provides best practices for the safe administration of procedural sedation and analgesia for interventional radiology procedures in adults. The document is aimed at health professionals involved in the provision of sedation and analgesia during interventional radiology procedures. The document has been developed by a writing group consisting of physicians with internationally recognised expertise in interventional radiology, and analgesia and sedation.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia/normas , Sedación Consciente/normas , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Radiología Intervencionista/métodos , Adulto , HumanosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: The world is currently facing an unprecedented healthcare crisis caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The objective of these guidelines is to produce a framework to facilitate the partial and gradual resumption of intervention activity in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The group has endeavoured to produce a minimum number of recommendations to highlight the strengths to be retained in the 7 predefined areas: (1) protection of staff and patients; (2) benefit/risk and patient information; (3) preoperative assessment and decision on intervention; (4) modalities of the preanaesthesia consultation; (5) specificity of anaesthesia and analgesia; (6) dedicated circuits and (7) containment exit type of interventions. RESULTS: The SFAR Guideline panel provides 51 statements on anaesthesia management in the context of COVID-19 pandemic. After one round of discussion and various amendments, a strong agreement was reached for 100% of the recommendations and algorithms. CONCLUSION: We present suggestions for how the risk of transmission by and to anaesthetists can be minimised and how personal protective equipment policies relate to COVID-19 pandemic context.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia/normas , Anestesia/normas , Betacoronavirus , Infecciones por Coronavirus , Control de Infecciones/normas , Pandemias , Neumonía Viral , Adulto , Manejo de la Vía Aérea , Analgesia/efectos adversos , Analgesia/métodos , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Anestesia/métodos , COVID-19 , Prueba de COVID-19 , Niño , Técnicas de Laboratorio Clínico , Comorbilidad , Infecciones por Coronavirus/diagnóstico , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/transmisión , Vías Clínicas , Infección Hospitalaria/prevención & control , Infección Hospitalaria/transmisión , Desinfección , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Contaminación de Equipos/prevención & control , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Control de Infecciones/métodos , Consentimiento Informado , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Quirófanos/normas , Pandemias/prevención & control , Aislamiento de Pacientes , Equipo de Protección Personal/provisión & distribución , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/transmisión , Cuidados Preoperatorios , Comité de Profesionales , Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Evaluación de Síntomas , Precauciones UniversalesRESUMEN
: Patient safety is an activity to mitigate preventable patient harm that may occur during the delivery of medical care. The European Board of Anaesthesiology (EBA)/European Union of Medical Specialists had previously published safety recommendations on minimal monitoring and postanaesthesia care, but with the growing public and professional interest it was decided to produce a much more encompassing document. The EBA and the European Society of Anaesthesiology (ESA) published a consensus on what needs to be done/achieved for improvement of peri-operative patient safety. During the Euroanaesthesia meeting in Helsinki/Finland in 2010, this vision was presented to anaesthesiologists, patients, industry and others involved in health care as the 'Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology'. In May/June 2020, ESA and EBA are celebrating the 10th anniversary of the Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology; a good opportunity to look back and forward evaluating what was achieved in the recent 10 years, and what needs to be done in the upcoming years. The Patient Safety and Quality Committee (PSQC) of ESA invited experts in their fields to contribute, and these experts addressed their topic in different ways; there are classical, narrative reviews, more systematic reviews, political statements, personal opinions and also original data presentation. With this publication we hope to further stimulate implementation of the Helsinki Declaration on Patient Safety in Anaesthesiology, as well as initiating relevant research in the future.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia/normas , Anestesia/normas , Anestesiología/normas , Competencia Clínica/normas , Errores Médicos/prevención & control , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Atención Perioperativa/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud/normas , Analgesia/efectos adversos , Anestesia/efectos adversos , Testimonio de Experto , Declaración de Helsinki , Humanos , Periodo Perioperatorio , Guías de Práctica Clínica como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In Italy, as in many European countries, Pediatric Emergency Medicine is not formally recognized as a pediatric subspecialty, hindering nation-wide adoption of standards of care, especially in the field of procedural sedation and analgesia (PSA) in the Emergency Department (ED). For this reason PSA in Italy is mostly neglected or performed very heterogeneously and by different providers, with no reference standard. We aimed to describe the procedures and results of the first multidisciplinary and multi-professional Consensus Conference in Italy on safe and effective pediatric PSA in Italian EDs. METHODS: The preparation, organization and conduct of the Consensus Conference, held in Florence in 2017, followed the recommended National methodological standards. Professionals from different specialties across the country were invited to participate. RESULTS: Overall 86 recommendations covering 8 themes (pre-sedation evaluation, pharmacologic agents, monitoring, equipment and discharge checklists, training, non-pharmacologic techniques, the adult ED setting, impact on hospitalizations) were developed, taking into account the Italian training system and healthcare organization characteristics. CONCLUSION: The results of the first multidisciplinary and multi-professional Consensus Conference in Italy are meant to provide up-to-date national guidance to improve the standard of care of children undergoing painful and stressful procedures in the ED. The recommendations will be periodically updated as new relevant evidence is published.
Asunto(s)
Analgesia/normas , Sedación Consciente/normas , Medicina de Emergencia/normas , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/normas , Pediatría/normas , Humanos , ItaliaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Enhanced clinical outcomes in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit following standardisation of analgesia and sedation practice are reported. Little is known about the impact of standardisation of analgesia and sedation practice including incorporation of a validated distress assessment instrument on infants post cardiac surgery, a subset of whom have Trisomy 21. This study investigated whether the parallel introduction of nurse-led analgesia and sedation guidelines including regular distress assessment would impact on morphine administered to infants post cardiac surgery, and whether any differences observed would be amplified within the Trisomy 21 population. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective single centre before/after study design was used. Patients aged between 44 weeks postconceptual age and one year old who had open cardiothoracic surgery were included. RESULTS: 61 patients before and 64 patients after the intervention were included. After the intervention, a reduction in the amount of morphine administered was not evident, while greater use of adjuvant sedatives and analgesics was observed. Patients with Trisomy 21 had a shorter duration of mechanical ventilation after the change in practice. CONCLUSION: The findings from this study affirm the importance of the nurses' role in managing prescribed analgesia and sedation supported by best available evidence. A continued education and awareness focus on analgesia and sedation management in the pursuit of best patient care is imperative.