Low recurrent thrombosis rates in single positive antiphospholipid syndrome regardless of type of anticoagulation.

Thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (TAPS) is characterized by thrombosis and persistently positive tests for antiphospholipid antibodies or lupus anticoagulant (LAC). Triple-positive APS has the highest risk of recurrent thrombosis, but no studies have focused on recurrent thrombosis in patients with single-positive TAPS. We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with single-positive TAPS diagnosed at Lifespan Health System, Rhode Island, to determine the rates and risk factors for recurrent thrombosis. Between January 2001 and April 2022, 128 patients were assessed who had single-positive APS (LAC = 98, aCL = 21, aß2GPI = 9) and who had been followed for a total of 1453.8 patient-years (median follow-up 3.04 years). The initial antithrombotic regimen was warfarin in 44 %, a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in 34 %, enoxaparin in 2 %, and no antithrombotic therapy or antiplatelet therapy only in 20 %. Recurrent thrombosis occurred in 16 (12.5 %) with a recurrent thrombosis rate of 3.08 per 100 patient-years. Systemic lupus erythematosus was the only variable significantly associated with recurrent thrombosis in a model adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, and type of positive APS test. All 16 patients with recurrent thrombosis were initially treated with warfarin, and, at the time of recurrent thrombosis, 13 patients remained on warfarin and three were off anticoagulation. In conclusion, the recurrent thrombosis rate in single-positive APS is low, and not all patients with a single-positive test may need indefinite anticoagulation with warfarin. Larger prospective studies are required to confirm this finding and establish optimal anticoagulation regimens for low-risk TAPS.

Eculizumab therapy and complement regulation in a case of resistant catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome.

Catastrophic antiphospholipid syndrome (CAPS) is a life-threatening form of antiphospholipid syndrome characterised by diffuse arterial and venous thrombosis, in the presence of positive antiphospholipid antibodies. The multiple sites of thrombosis in small, medium and large vessels progress to multiorgan failure, accounting for the high mortality rate associated with CAPS. Unregulated complement activation is increasingly recognised as critical to the pathogenesis of CAPS. Early diagnosis is essential to initiate prompt life-saving treatment with the triple therapy of anticoagulation, immunosuppression and either plasmapheresis or intravenous immunoglobulin. Among other immunosuppressive agents, eculizumab, a complement inhibitor has demonstrated efficacy in treatment-resistant cases.We report an instructive case of a woman presenting with both clinical and laboratory findings consistent with primary CAPS, resistant to initial treatment and responsive to eculizumab, with emphasis on genetic testing and implications for future therapy.

Antiphospholipid syndrome, thrombosis, and vaccination in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Thrombosis is one of the many signs of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and COVID-19 infection. Although the mechanisms contributing to thrombosis in APS and COVID-19 are relatively similar, this remains an open subject. Even now (when the COVID-19 pandemic has subsided), there is no conclusive solution to APS and COVID-19 co-occurrence. The presence of newly generated antiphospholipid antibodies (aPLs) in COVID-19 infection may or may not be connected to the diagnosis of APS. The prevalence of aPLs is substantial in severe COVID-19 but not related to thrombosis or a worse outcome. Adequate monitoring of antibody positivity over time is recommended for APL diagnosis. On the other hand, thrombosis and thrombocytopenia can rarely occur with vaccination with mRNA vaccines. Some studies have shown that COVID-19 immunization is well tolerated among APS patients who are triple-positive for aPL, which may comfort patients and referring physicians and lessen hesitation in unvaccinated APS/aPL-positive patients. In this narrative review, we will give an overview of the interaction between aPL-APS-COVID-19-thrombosis and related diagnostic insights learned during the pandemic.

Taipan snake venom time has high sensitivity for lupus anticoagulants in non-anticoagulated, triple positive antiphospholipid syndrome patients.

INTRODUCTION: Dilute Russell's viper venom time (dRVVT) and activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT) are the mainstay assays in lupus anticoagulant (LA) detection yet they have limitations, particularly in relation to interferences and specificity. The recently validated Taipan snake venom time (TSVT) screening with ecarin time (ET) confirmatory assays overcome many of those limitations due to the innate specificity engendered from direct prothrombin activation, and insensitivity to the effects of vitamin K antagonists (VKA). The present study aimed to further evidence diagnostic utility of TSVT/ET by performing them in samples from 116 nonanticoagulated patients with established triple-positive antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). METHODS: Samples were identified in three expert centres who performed dRVVT, APTT and solid phase antiphospholipid antibody assays with reagents from a variety of manufacturers. All samples additionally received TSVT/ET analysis using standardised reagents. RESULTS: Ninety seven of 116 (83.6%) were dRVVT- and APTT-positive, 85/97 (87.6%) of which were TSVT/ET-positive, 9/116 (7.8%) were dRVVT-positive only, 6 of which were TSVT/ET-positive, and 10/116 (8.6%) were APTT-positive only, 5 of which were TSVT/ET-positive. 96/116 TSVT/ET-positivity returned a high sensitivity for LA of 82.8%. Low coefficients of determination revealed weak relationships between LA potency and anticardiolipin and anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibody titres for all three LA assays. CONCLUSIONS: TSVT/ET has high sensitivity for the clinically significant LA found in triple positive APS patients. TSVT/ET can establish multiple LA assay positivity in nonanticoagulated patients negative for one of dRVVT or APTT, and is the only assay pairing insensitive to VKAs, the recommended anticoagulation for APS.

Anticoagulant and non-anticoagulant therapy in thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome: old drugs and new treatment targets.

In this review, we discuss the current evidence on classic and newer oral anticoagulant therapy, older drugs such as HCQ and statins, and new potential treatment targets in APS. Vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) remain the cornerstone treatment for thrombotic events in APS. In patients fulfilling criteria for definite APS presenting with a first venous thrombosis, treatment with VKAs with a target international normalized ratio (INR) 2.0-3.0 is recommended. In patients with arterial thrombosis, treatment with VKA with target INR 2.0-3.0 or 3.0-4.0 is recommended by recent guidelines, considering the individual's bleeding and thrombosis recurrence risk. A combination of VKAs and low-dose aspirin (75-100 mg/daily) may also be considered. According to available evidence direct oral anticoagulants should be avoided in patients with arterial thrombosis and/or those with triple aPL positivity. Adjunctive treatment with HCQ and/or statins can be considered, especially in anticoagulation treatment-refractory APS. Potential targeted treatments in APS include B-cell targeting, complement inhibition, mammalian target of rapamycin inhibition, IFN targeting, adenosine receptors agonists, CD38 targeting or chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy. The safety and efficacy of these treatment targets needs to be examined in well-designed randomized controlled trials.

Thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding in non-anticoagulated thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome patients: Prospective study from antiphospholipid syndrome alliance for clinical trials and international networking (APS ACTION) clinical database and repository ("Registry").

BACKGROUND: Long-term anticoagulant therapy is generally recommended for thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (TAPS) patients, however it may be withdrawn or not introduced in routine practice. OBJECTIVES: To prospectively evaluate the risk of thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding in non-anticoagulated TAPS patients, compared to anticoagulated TAPS, and secondly, to identify different features between those two groups. PATIENTS/METHODS: Using an international registry, we identified non-anticoagulated TAPS patients at baseline, and matched them with anticoagulated TAPS patients based on gender, age, type of previous thrombosis, and associated autoimmune disease. Thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding were prospectively analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and compared using a marginal Cox's regression model. RESULTS: As of June 2022, 94 (14 %) of the 662 TAPS patients were not anticoagulated; and 93 of them were matched with 181 anticoagulated TAPS patients (median follow-up 5 years [interquartile range 3 to 8]). The 5-year thrombosis recurrence and major bleeding rates were 12 % versus 10 %, and 6 % versus 7 %, respectively (hazard ratio [HR] 1.38, 95 % confidence interval [CI] 0.53 to 3.56, p = 0.50 and HR 0.53; 95 % CI 0.15 to 1.86; p = 0.32, respectively). Non-anticoagulated patients were more likely to receive antiplatelet therapy (p < 0.001), and less likely to have more than one previous thrombosis (p < 0.001) and lupus anticoagulant positivity (p = 0.01). CONCLUSION: Fourteen percent of the TAPS patients were not anticoagulated at recruitment. Their recurrent thrombosis risk did not differ compared to matched anticoagulated TAPS patients, supporting the pressing need for risk-stratified secondary thrombosis prevention trials in APS investigating strategies other than anticoagulation.

A thrombin-driven neural net diagnoses the antiphospholipid syndrome without the need for interruption of anticoagulation.

ABSTRACT: Thrombosis is an important manifestation of the antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). The thrombin generation (TG) test is a global hemostasis assay, and increased TG is associated with thrombosis. APS is currently diagnosed based on clinical and laboratory criteria, the latter defined as anti-cardiolipin, anti-ß2-glycoprotein I antibodies, or lupus anticoagulant (LA). APS testing is often performed after a thrombotic episode and subsequent administration of anticoagulation, which might hamper the interpretation of clotting assays used for LA testing. We set out to develop an artificial neural network (NN) that can diagnose APS in patients who underwent vitamin K antagonist (VKA) treatment, based on TG test results. Five NNs were trained to diagnose APS in 48 VKA-treated patients with APS and 64 VKA-treated controls, using TG and thrombin dynamics parameters as inputs. The 2 best-performing NNs were selected (accuracy, 96%; sensitivity, 96%-98%; and specificity, 95%-97%) and further validated in an independent cohort of VKA-anticoagulated patients with APS (n = 33) and controls (n = 62). Independent clinical validation favored 1 of the 2 selected NNs, with a sensitivity of 88% and a specificity of 94% for the diagnosis of APS. In conclusion, the combined use of TG and NN methodology allowed for us to develop an NN that diagnoses APS with an accuracy of 92% in individuals with VKA anticoagulation (n = 95). After further clinical validation, the NN could serve as a screening and diagnostic tool for patients with thrombosis, especially because there is no need to interrupt anticoagulant therapy.

Chorea as an initial and solitary manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus with antiphospholipid syndrome in an elderly man.

Chorea can be an initial manifestation of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) or antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). It has been mostly described in younger female adults in association with other manifestations of SLE. When chorea appears as an initial and only manifestation in SLE/APS patients, the establishment of the correct diagnosis is difficult, and it may be initially attributed to a more common aetiology. Here we report an elderly man who presented with a new onset of right-sided chorea without other clinical manifestations of SLE/APS. He started on steroids a year later, however, there was no improvement. His chorea was symptomatically managed along with aspirin, and hydroxychloroquine as he refused to be on additional immunosuppression. Anticoagulation was relatively contraindicated, and also not favoured by this patient; therefore, aspirin was initiated. Even in elderly patients, once the common etiologies of chorea have been worked up, we suggest doing a rheumatological evaluation. Early diagnosis and prompt treatment can prevent persistent neurological abnormality.

Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment for obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome refractory to conventional therapy: A single-arm, open-labelled multicentre clinical trial.

OBJECTIVES: The objective of the study was to compare the efficacy of intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) therapy for obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) refractory to conventional treatment. METHODS: We conducted a single-arm, open-label multicentre clinical intervention trial. The enrolled criteria were patients with refractory APS who had a history of still or premature birth before 30 weeks of gestational age, even though they had been treated with conventional treatment, i.e. heparin and low-dose aspirin. After confirming the foetal heartbeats, a single course of IVIG (0.4 g/kg body weight daily for 5 days) was added to conventional treatment. The primary outcome was a live birth ratio of >30 weeks of gestational period, and the secondary outcome included improving pregnancy outcomes compared to previous pregnancy. RESULTS: Twenty-five per cent of patients (2 of 8 cases) achieved a live birth after the 30th week of pregnancy by IVIG-only add-on treatment, which is the same prevalence as the historical control. However, by adding other second-line therapy to IVIG and conventional treatment, further three patients (37.5%) achieved improvements in pregnancy outcome compared to previous treatments. In total, five patients (62.5%) were able to achieve preferable pregnancy outcomes through combination treatment including IVIG. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical trial could not demonstrate the efficacy of IVIG-only add-on therapy at improving the pregnancy outcomes of patients with obstetric APS refractory to conventional treatment. However, the combination of IVIG with rituximab or statins adding to conventional treatment improved pregnancy outcomes and resulted in more live births. Further studies are needed to investigate the efficacy of multi-targeted therapy to treat obstetric refractory APS.

The effects of hydroxychloroquine and its promising use in refractory obstetric antiphospholipid syndrome.

Hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) is obtained by hydroxylation of chloroquine (CQ) and the first indication was malaria. Nowadays, HCQ is commonly used in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) with favorable results. Antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) is an autoimmune disease characterized by thrombosis and/or pregnancy morbidity and persistent positivity of antiphospholipid antibodies. Around 20-30% of pregnant women with APS develop adverse pregnancy outcomes despite conventional treatment with aspirin and heparin, called refractory obstetric APS. Interestingly, HCQ has shown positive effects on top of the standard of care in some refractory obstetric APS patients. HCQ mechanisms of action in APS comprise its ability to bind sialic acid present in cell membranes, its capacity to block the binding of antiphospholipid antibodies to the cell and the induced increase of pH in extracellular and intracellular compartments. However, the precise mechanisms of HCQ in the specific situation of refractory APS still need to be fully clarified. Therefore, this review summarizes the known modulating effects of HCQ and CQ, their side effects and use in APS and different pathologies to understand the benefit effects and the mechanism of action of HCQ in refractory obstetric APS.

SAPHO syndrome complicated by multiple venous thrombosis of left lower limb: A case report and literature review.

Synovitis, acne, pustulosis, hyperostosis, and osteitis (SAPHO) syndrome is an uncommon clinical syndrome with the signs of skin problems and osteoarthropathy as its main features. The pathogenesis of SAPHO syndrome has not been fully elucidated, and multiple complications may be present, including thrombosis. A 39-year-old male patient was diagnosed with SAPHO syndrome, complicated by multiple venous thrombosis of the left lower limb. We conducted a brief review of the current available literature on thrombosis in patients with SAPHO syndrome and speculated that the presence of lower extremity thrombosis in this patient with SAPHO syndrome may be related to physiological structure or antiphospholipid syndrome. Whether positive lupus anticoagulant has an effect on thrombosis in patients with SAPHO syndrome remains to be investigated.

Can anticoagulation be withdrawn in APS patients after aPL negativization?

Long-term vitamin K antagonist (VKA) anticoagulation is the cornerstone of the management of subjects with thrombotic antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). Recent investigations have opened up new discussion points regarding the potential for stopping anticoagulant medication in patients with a history of thrombotic APS who no longer have detectable aPL (the so called aPL negativization). Despite the lack of unanimous agreement, some experts agreed on defining aPL negativization as the presence of two negative determinations, 1 year apart. What to do in order to optimize the management of these subjects with thrombotic APS when aPL turn negative is still a matter of debate. In this review, we aim to summarize the main evidence highlighting the magnitude of aPL negativizing among patients with APS and the features to keep in mind when considering (or not) stopping anticoagulation.

Ischemic Stroke with Positive Antiphospholipid Antibodies in Bloom Syndrome: A Case Report.

OBJECTIVE: Bloom syndrome is a chromosomal breakage disorder associated with immune deficiency, characterized by short stature, predisposition to early-onset cancer, and immune defects. Currently, there have been no reports of acute cerebral infarction in patients with Bloom syndrome. Here, we report a case of Bloom syndrome complicated by elevated antiphospholipid antibodies and acute cerebral infarction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 23-year-old male with a known genetic diagnosis of Bloom syndrome was admitted to the Respiratory Department due to pulmonary aspergillosis. The patient experienced sudden dizziness, and subsequent cranial MRI revealed a newly developed infarction in the right cerebellar hemisphere. RESULTS: Six days later, the patient presented with sudden right visual field loss, and a repeat cranial MRI showed new infarctions in the left occipital and temporal lobes. Positive lupus anticoagulant and prolonged activated partial thromboplastin time suggested elevated antiphospholipid antibodies causing thrombus formation. Unfortunately, anticoagulant treatment was not administered due to recurrent hemoptysis. CONCLUSION: This study reports the first case of a Bloom syndrome patient with elevated antiphospholipid antibodies and acute cerebral infarction, suggesting that the immune and coagulation abnormalities caused by Bloom syndrome may contribute to the development of acute cerebral infarction.

A Rare Case with Pulmonary Embolism and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary embolism is rare in children, and most of them have high-risk factors, such as antiphospholipid syndrome, intravenous catheterization, fracture bed rest, etc. For children with pulmonary embolism without clear inducement, hereditary thrombophilia should be considered. Genetic protein S deficiency (PSD) is a kind of thrombophilia, which is caused by the mutation of PROS 1 gene, resulting in an increased tendency to thrombosis. METHODS: The diagnosis of the two cases was made after detecting based on Thrombophilia screening and Sanger sequencing in clinical laboratory. RESULTS: Sanger sequencing found that case 2 and case 1 genotypes were the same, case 1 sister and grandfather carried c.200a>c (p.e67a) mutation, and case 1 aunt and grandmother did not carry PROS1 gene mutation. Case 1 received anticoagulation therapy for 3 months, and case 2 also received anticoagulation therapy for 3 months. During the 1 year follow-up, no new thrombotic events and no adverse reactions such as bleeding were observed in both patients. CONCLUSIONS: For children with pulmonary embolism without clear risk factors, PSD should be considered, and protein S activity should be tested before receiving anticoagulant drugs.

Complement biomarkers in the antiphospholipid syndrome - Approaches to quantification and implications for clinical management.

Complement is a major driver of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) and a promising therapeutic target in refractory and catastrophic APS. Complement testing in APS is largely limited to research settings, and reliable, rapid-turnaround biomarkers are needed to predict those at risk for adverse clinical outcomes and most likely to benefit from complement inhibition. We review complement biomarkers and their association with thrombosis and obstetric outcomes, including: (i) complement proteins and activation fragments in the fluid phase; (ii) assays that evaluate complement on cell membranes (e.g. in vivo cell-bound complement fragments, hemolytic assays, and ex vivo 'functional' cell-based assays, and (iii) sequencing of complement genes. Current studies highlight the inconsistencies in testing both between studies and various aPL/APS subgroups, suggesting that either cell-based testing or multiplex panels employing a combination of biomarkers simultaneously may be most clinically relevant. Standardization of complement assays is needed to ensure reproducibility and establish clinically relevant applications.

Tacrolimus shows adequate efficacy in patients with antiphospholipid antibodies associated thrombocytopenia: a retrospective cohort study.

Thrombocytopenia is a common manifestation associated with the presence of antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL). The aim of this study is to investigate the efficacy and safety of tacrolimus treatment in aPL associated thrombocytopenia. This is a single-center retrospective study. Patients who had persistent positive aPL and thrombocytopenia that was treated with tacrolimus were included. A total of 49 patients [38 females (77.6%)] were enrolled from Nov 2013 to Apr 2022 with a median treatment duration of 22 months. Seventeen fulfilled classification criteria of antiphospholipid syndrome (APS), 18 systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The median age of study patients was 37 years (IQR 31, 48). Forty-three (87.8%) patients were on concomitant use of glucocorticoids, 6 on tacrolimus monotherapy. The overall response rate in this cohort was 85.7% (n = 42), including 49% of complete responses (n = 24). The median time to achieve a response was 3 months. Nine (18.4%) patients with overall response experienced a loss of response. The response rate during follow-up in patients with monotherapy was noninferior. Patients with positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) showed the tendency of maintaining response (p = 0.028). The 19 patients who were on medium and high dosage of glucocorticoids (> 15 mg prednisone/d) managed to taper glucocorticoids rapidly. Side effects were reported in 12.2% (n = 6) of the patients (elevated creatinine, general malaise, elevated liver enzyme). Tacrolimus has adequate efficacy, steroid-sparing effect and is well tolerated for aPL associated thrombocytopenia. Patients with positive ANA might benefit the most from tacrolimus treatment.