RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There is a lack of standardized assessment tools for poststroke aphasia in Brazil, particularly bedside screenings for early identification of patients with suspected language disorders. The Language Screening Test (LAST) is a valid and reliable method for screening hospitalized patients following a stroke. This tool was first developed in French and then translated and validated in other languages. PURPOSE: This study aimed to translate, culturally adapt, and validate the LAST into Brazilian Portuguese. METHOD: Following a systematic, multistep approach to translation and cultural adaptation of language instruments, this study developed the two parallel versions of the Brazilian Portuguese LAST (pLAST) Versions A and B. The final versions were applied to 70 healthy and 30 poststroke adults across age and educational levels. Subtests of the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) were used to assess the external validity of the pLAST. RESULTS: Findings showed that the two versions (A and B) of the pLAST were equivalent (intraclass correlation coefficient = .91; p < .001). No floor or ceiling effects were observed, and internal validity was excellent (Cronbach's α = .85). Moreover, its external validity against the BDAE was moderate to strong. Test sensitivity and specificity were 0.88 and 1, respectively, and accuracy was 0.96. CONCLUSION: The Brazilian Portuguese version of the LAST is a valid, simple, easy, and rapid test to screen poststroke aphasia in hospital settings. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.23548911.
Asunto(s)
Afasia , Pruebas del Lenguaje , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Humanos , Afasia/diagnóstico , Afasia/etiología , Brasil , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Traducciones , Comparación Transcultural , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana EdadRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The goal of the Collaborative Commentary (CC) system is to make the TalkBank adult clinical databases-including AphasiaBank, DementiaBank, RHDBank, and TBIBank-open to commentary and analysis from the full community of researchers, instructors, students, and clinicians. METHOD: CC allows a group leader to establish a commentary group and invite colleagues or students to join as members of the group. Members can then browse through the transcript database using the TalkBank Browser. When they wish to insert a comment, they click on the utterance line number or drag the cursor across a range of utterances and a window opens to receive the comment. The comment can include open text along with codes selected from a predefined set of codes created by that commentary group. RESULTS: CC was released for public use in August 2022. It is being used currently in five research projects and eight classes. An important feature of CC is its ability to evaluate the reliability of coding systems and to sharpen analytic categories. By familiarizing instructors and researchers with the capabilities of CC, we expect to see an increasing usage of CC for a variety of clinical and research applications. CONCLUSIONS: CC can contribute to a better understanding of connected speech features in aphasia, dementia, right hemisphere disorder, and traumatic brain injury. CC represents an extreme innovation not only for the study of adult neurogenic communication disorders but also for the study of spoken language generally.
Asunto(s)
Afasia , Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Trastornos de la Comunicación , Adulto , Humanos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Trastornos de la Comunicación/diagnóstico , Habla , Afasia/diagnóstico , ComunicaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether a short-form computerized adaptive testing (CAT) version of the Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT) provides error profiles and model-based estimates of semantic and phonological processing that agree with the full test. METHOD: Twenty-four persons with aphasia took the PNT-CAT and the full version of the PNT (hereinafter referred to as the "full PNT") at least 2 weeks apart. The PNT-CAT proceeded in two stages: (a) the PNT-CAT30, in which 30 items were selected to match the evolving ability estimate with the goal of producing a 50% error rate, and (b) the PNT-CAT60, in which an additional 30 items were selected to produce a 75% error rate. Agreement was evaluated in terms of the root-mean-square deviation of the response-type proportions and, for individual response types, in terms of agreement coefficients and bias. We also evaluated agreement and bias for estimates of semantic and phonological processing derived from the semantic-phonological interactive two-step model (SP model) of word production. RESULTS: The results suggested that agreement was poorest for semantic, formal, mixed, and unrelated errors, all of which were underestimated by the short forms. Better agreement was observed for correct and nonword responses. SP model weights estimated by the short forms demonstrated no substantial bias but generally inadequate agreement with the full PNT, which itself showed acceptable test-retest reliability for SP model weights and all response types except for formal errors. DISCUSSION: Results suggest that the PNT-CAT30 and the PNT-CAT60 are generally inadequate for generating naming error profiles or model-derived estimates of semantic and phonological processing ability. Post hoc analyses suggested that increasing the number of stimuli available in the CAT item bank may improve the utility of adaptive short forms for generating error profiles, but the underlying theory also suggests that there are limitations to this approach based on a unidimensional measurement model. SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIAL: https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.22320814.
Asunto(s)
Afasia , Humanos , Afasia/diagnóstico , Lingüística , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , SemánticaRESUMEN
Caracterizar as alterações de linguagem encontradas em pacientes com lesão encefálica adquirida em fase aguda Métodos: Trata-se de uma pesquisa observacional, descritiva do tipo transversal. A avaliação foi realizada nas enfermarias de um hospital de urgências, com pacientes de idade superior a 18 anos, diagnóstico de lesão encefálica adquirida e tempo de internação de até 60 dias. O protocolo utilizado incluiu avaliação das praxias orais, expressão, compreensão da linguagem oral e leitura. Ao final, foi possível apresentar as hipóteses diagnósticas de afasias fluentes e não fluentes, disartria e sem alteração de linguagem. A análise dos dados foi realizada por meio de estatística descritiva através da distribuição de frequência absoluta e frequência relativa Resultados: A amostra foi composta por 24 pacientes sendo a maioria do gênero masculino, com média de idade de 51 anos. O diagnóstico de maior frequência foi Acidente Vascular Cerebral. Dos pacientes avaliados, 79% tiveram alterações de fala/linguagem. As hipóteses diagnósticas fonoaudiológicas encontradas foram: afasia global, afasia de broca, afasia transcortical mista, afasia de condução, afasia transcortical motora, afasia transcortical sensorial e disartria. Conclusão: A afasia global foi o transtorno de linguagem de maior ocorrência entre os indivíduos, bem como o gênero masculino e o acidente vascular cerebral. A avaliação da linguagem de pacientes com lesões encefálicas adquiridas na fase aguda é pertinente, pois promove o levantamento de alterações desde as perceptíveis até as mais discretas
To characterize the language disorders found in patients with brain injury acquired in the acute phase Methods: This is an observational, descriptive cross-sectional study. The evaluation was carried out in the wards of an emergency hospital, with patients aged over 18 years, diagnosed with acquired brain injury and hospitalization time of up to 60 days. The protocol used included assessment of oral praxis, expression, comprehension of oral language and reading. In the end, it was possible to present the diagnostic hypotheses of fluent and non-fluent aphasias, dysarthria and without language alteration. Data analysis was performed using descriptive statistics through the distribution of absolute frequency and relative frequency. Results: The sample consisted of 24 patients, most of whom were male, with a mean age of 51 years. The most frequent diagnosis was Cerebral Vascular Accident. Of the evaluated patients, 79% had speech/language disorders. The speech-language diagnostic hypotheses found were: global aphasia, drill aphasia, mixed transcortical aphasia, conduction aphasia, motor transcortical aphasia, sensory transcortical aphasia and dysarthria. Conclusion: Global aphasia was the most frequent language disorder among individuals, as well as males and stroke. The evaluation of the language of patients with brain injuries acquired in the acute phase is relevant, as it promotes the survey of changes from the perceptible to the most discreet
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Lesiones Encefálicas/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Trastornos del Lenguaje , Afasia/diagnóstico , DisartriaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The external validity of aphasia treatment research relies on diverse and representative participants. The purposes of this study were (a) to examine whether reporting of patient-reported age, sex, and race/ethnicity has improved since Ellis (2009) and (b) to evaluate whether these demographic variables were consistent with population-level estimates of stroke survivor demographics in the United States. METHOD: A scoping review examined U.S.-based aphasia treatment studies published between 2009 and 2019 and characterized the percentage of studies reporting age, sex, and race/ethnicity. Summary statistics for these variables were calculated and compared statistically with a population-based study of stroke survivors. RESULTS: It was found out that 97.1% of studies reported age, 93.5% reported sex, and 28.1% reported race and/or ethnicity. Within reporting studies, participant mean age was 58.04 years, 61.6% of participants were men, and 38.4% were women; 86.5% of participants were White, 11.0% were Black, 2.0% were Hispanic/Latino, and 0.5% fell in other racial categories. All three variables were statistically different from the study of Kissela et al. (2012). DISCUSSION: Despite being highlighted as an issue by Ellis (2009), less than 30% of recent aphasia treatment studies reported race or ethnicity, and participants do not appear to be demographically representative compared with estimates of stroke survivors living in the United States. These issues may negatively impact the ecological validity of aphasia treatment research. Aphasia researchers should more consistently report participant race and ethnicity and follow current guidelines for increasing the demographic representation of women and minorities.
Asunto(s)
Afasia , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Afasia/diagnóstico , Afasia/terapia , Etnicidad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Grupos Minoritarios , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/diagnóstico , Accidente Cerebrovascular/terapia , Sobrevivientes , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Language tests are important in the assessment and follow up of people with aphasia (PWA). However, language assessment in the low literacy population is still a challenge. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether a formal evaluation of aphasia is able to distinguish the neurological effect from the effect of low educational level in people with post-stroke aphasia. METHODS: The sample consisted of a group of 30 aphasic subjects (AG) and a control group (CG) of 36 individuals, both with an educational level of 1-4 years. The Brazilian Montreal-Toulouse Language Assessment battery was applied to all subjects. RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences between the groups in 19 out of the 20 tasks analyzed. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that formal evaluation procedures are able to detect language disorders resulting from stroke, even in subjects with low educational level.
Asunto(s)
Afasia , Accidente Cerebrovascular , Afasia/diagnóstico , Afasia/etiología , Afasia/patología , Brasil , Escolaridad , Humanos , Pruebas del Lenguaje , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicacionesRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Specifying the active ingredients in aphasia interventions can inform treatment theory and improve clinical implementation. This secondary analysis examined three practice-related predictors of treatment response in semantic feature verification (SFV) treatment. We hypothesized that (a) successful feature verification practice would be associated with naming outcomes if SFV operates similarly to standard feature generation semantic feature analysis and (b) successful retrieval practice would be associated with naming outcomes for treated, but not semantically related, untreated words if SFV operates via a retrieval practice-oriented lexical activation mechanism. METHOD: Item-level data from nine participants with poststroke aphasia who received SFV treatment reported in the work of Evans, Cavanaugh, Quique, et al. (2021) were analyzed using Bayesian generalized linear mixed-effects models. Models evaluated whether performance on three treatment components (facilitated retrieval, feature verification, and effortful retrieval) moderated treatment response for treated and semantically related, untreated words. RESULTS: There was no evidence for or against a relationship between successful feature verification practice and treatment response. In contrast, there was a robust relationship between the two retrieval practice components and treatment response for treated words only. DISCUSSION: Findings were consistent with the second hypothesis: Retrieval practice, but not feature verification practice, appears to be a practice-related predictor of treatment response in SFV. However, treatment components are likely interdependent, and feature verification may still be an active ingredient in SFV. Further research is needed to evaluate the causal role of treatment components on treatment outcomes in aphasia.
Asunto(s)
Afasia , Humanos , Teorema de Bayes , Afasia/diagnóstico , Afasia/etiología , Afasia/terapia , Semántica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT Background: Language tests are important in the assessment and follow up of people with aphasia (PWA). However, language assessment in the low literacy population is still a challenge. Objective: To investigate whether a formal evaluation of aphasia is able to distinguish the neurological effect from the effect of low educational level in people with post-stroke aphasia. Methods: The sample consisted of a group of 30 aphasic subjects (AG) and a control group (CG) of 36 individuals, both with an educational level of 1-4 years. The Brazilian Montreal-Toulouse Language Assessment battery was applied to all subjects. Results: There were statistically significant differences between the groups in 19 out of the 20 tasks analyzed. Conclusions: These results suggest that formal evaluation procedures are able to detect language disorders resulting from stroke, even in subjects with low educational level.
RESUMO Antecedentes: Os testes de linguagem são importantes para a avaliação e o acompanhamento de pacientes afásicos. Apesar disso, a avaliação de linguagem em indivíduos com baixa escolaridade ainda é um desafio. Objetivo: Investigar se a avaliação formal da afasia é capaz de diferenciar o efeito da lesão neurológica versus o efeito da baixa escolaridade em pacientes afásicos, acometidos por acidente vascular cerebral (AVC). Métodos: A amostra foi composta de um grupo de 30 sujeitos afásicos (AG) e um grupo controle (CG) de 36 indivíduos, todos com um a quatro anos de escolaridade. A Bateria Montreal-Toulouse de Avaliação da Linguagem foi administrada a todos os participantes. Resultados: Das 20 tarefas analisadas, 19 apresentaram diferenças significativas entre os grupos. Conclusões: Os resultados sugerem que procedimentos formais de avaliação são capazes de identificar as alterações linguísticas ocasionadas por um AVC, também em pacientes com baixa escolaridade.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Afasia/diagnóstico , Afasia/etiología , Afasia/patología , Brasil , Escolaridad , Pruebas del LenguajeRESUMEN
Aphasia as a sequel to stroke is present between 14-28% worldwide and in 20% in the Chilean population. The most serious form is called global aphasia, with a severe alteration of the comprehensive and expressive language, with a poor communicative prognosis and quality of life for the patient and families. The objective of this case is to describe the evolution of a person with global aphasia from the acute phase to 3 years of speech therapy treatment, who achieved a successful evolution of their language, communication and quality of life. This paper presented anamnestic data of the case, initial and systematic evaluation of linguistic functions and impact on quality of life, and the results that document its progress in 3 years. Also, this case is described dynamic person-centered treatment and methodology to start in the acute phase with severe compromise (aphasic cocient 6/100 Cutoff 93.8) and after 3 years improve to mild-moderate aphasia (76/100 points). Progress in vitality, communication, physical and psychosocial aspects and the mean quality of life score are described quantitatively. (AU)
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Afasia/terapia , Rehabilitación de los Trastornos del Habla y del Lenguaje , Afasia/diagnóstico , Afasia/etiología , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicacionesRESUMEN
RESUMO Objetivo verificar os desfechos de deglutição e alimentação de pacientes pediátricos submetidos à intubação orotraqueal (IOT) prolongada, considerando aqueles que evoluíram para traqueostomia após. Métodos estudo de coorte retrospectivo, realizado por meio da análise de prontuários de pacientes admitidos em Unidade de Terapia Intensiva Pediátrica e acompanhados até a alta hospitalar, entre março de 2017 e dezembro de 2018. Resultados dos 51 pacientes incluídos, 64,7% eram do gênero masculino e a mediana de idade foi de 6,7 meses. Pacientes submetidos à IOT por mediana de sete dias apresentaram disfagia orofaríngea (DOF) leve e, quando submetidos a mais de 14 dias, apresentaram DOF moderada/grave, distúrbio alimentar pediátrico (DAP) com características de recusa alimentar e contraindicação de alimentação por via oral na alta hospitalar. Dentre os pacientes, 74,5% foram submetidos apenas à IOT e 25,5% evoluíram para traqueostomia, após. Pacientes traqueostomizados apresentaram maior ocorrência de alta hospitalar com DOF moderada/grave, DAP com características de recusa alimentar e uso de via alternativa de alimentação, em comparação a pacientes sem traqueostomia (p=0,001). Comparado ao diagnóstico inicial, pacientes não traqueostomizados tiveram diagnóstico final com graus mais leves de disfagia (p<0,001). Conclusão o tempo de IOT e a presença de traqueostomia são fatores associados ao diagnóstico fonoaudiológico de DOF moderada/grave, à presença de sinais de DAP com características de recusa alimentar e à necessidade de via alternativa de alimentação, persistentes até a alta hospitalar, sendo achados fonoaudiológicos frequentes entre os desfechos de deglutição/alimentação em pediatria.
ABSTRACT Purpose To verify the swallowing and feeding outcomes of pediatric patients undergoing prolonged OTI, considering those who progressed to tracheostomy afterward. Methods Retrospective cohort study, carried out by analyzing the medical records of patients admitted to the Pediatric ICU and followed up until hospital discharge, between 03/2017 and 12/2018. Results Of the 51 patients included, 64.7% were male and the median age 6.7 months. Patients undergoing OTI for a median of 7 days had mild dysphagia and when submitted for more than 14 days had moderate/severe dysphagia and PFD with characteristics of food refusal, with contraindication to oral feeding at hospital discharge. 74.5% of the patients underwent OTI only and 25.5% progressed to tracheostomy afterward. Tracheostomized patients had a higher occurrence of hospital discharge with moderate/ severe oropharyngeal dysphagia, pediatric feeding disorder (PFD) with characteristics of food refusal and alternative method of feeding compared to patients without tracheostomy (p=0.001). Non-tracheostomized patients had a final diagnosis with milder degrees of dysphagia when compared to the initial diagnosis (p<0.001). Conclusion The time of OTI and the presence of tracheostomy are factors associated with the speech-language pathology diagnosis of moderate/severe oropharyngeal dysphagia, presence of signs of PFD with characteristics of food refusal and the need for an alternative method of feeding that persists until hospital discharge, being frequent findings among the swallowing/feeding outcomes in pediatrics.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Recién Nacido , Lactante , Afasia/diagnóstico , Traqueostomía , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Trastornos de Deglución , Intubación Intratraqueal/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Purpose We aimed to describe the current practices of speech-language pathologists regarding the creation and implementation of home practice programs for persons with poststroke aphasia. Method Survey participants were American Speech-Language-Hearing Association-certified speech-language pathologists, had 30% of their caseload include persons with aphasia, and had recently created at least two home programs for persons with aphasia. Respondents completed a web-based survey on home program creation, training, technology, and methods for tracking adherence with closed and open-ended questions. Results We analyzed 80 complete surveys. Most of the participants (n = 56) created home programs for greater than 75% of their caseload. Common interventions in home programs addressed functional practice and spoken expression. Participants describe instructional techniques including building skill practice in daily routines and guided practice. Applications of technology and formal mechanisms to monitor adherence were less frequently reported. Various factors were identified as facilitators and barriers to home program creation with environmental support from others and client factors (i.e., motivation, impairments) most evident. Conclusions This study provides insight into speech-language pathologists' home program creation and implementation. Results can be used to consider mechanisms to improve use of and adherence to home programs to further support recovery. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.16840204.
Asunto(s)
Afasia , Patología del Habla y Lenguaje , Afasia/diagnóstico , Afasia/terapia , Humanos , Patólogos , Habla , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Purpose Aphasia intervention research aims to improve communication and quality of life outcomes for people with aphasia. However, few studies have evaluated the translation and implementation of evidence-based aphasia interventions to clinical practice. Treatment dosage may be difficult to translate to clinical settings, and a mismatch between dosage in research and clinical practice threatens to attenuate intervention effectiveness. The purpose of this study is to quantify a potential research-practice dosage gap in outpatient aphasia rehabilitation. Method This study utilized a two-part approach. First, we estimated clinical treatment dosage in an episode of care (i.e., treatment provided from outpatient assessment to discharge) via utilization in a regional provider in the United States. Second, we undertook a scoping review of aphasia interventions published from 2009 to 2019 to estimate the typical dosage used in the current aphasia literature. Results Outpatient clinical episodes of care included a median of 10 treatment sessions and a mean of 14.8 sessions (interquartile range: 5-20 sessions). Sessions occurred 1-2 times a week over 4-14 weeks. The median total hours of treatment was 7.5 hr (interquartile range: 3.75-15 hr). In contrast, published interventions administered a greater treatment dosage, consisting of a median of 20 hr of treatment (interquartile range: 12-30 hr) over the course of 15 sessions (interquartile range: 10-24 sessions) approximately 3 times per week. Conclusions Results demonstrate a meaningful research-practice dosage gap, particularly in total treatment hours and weekly treatment intensity. This gap highlights the potential for attenuation of effectiveness from research to outpatient settings. Future translational research should consider clinical dosage constraints and take steps to facilitate intervention implementation, particularly with regard to dosage. Conversely, health care advocacy and continued development of alternative delivery methods are necessary for the successful implementation of treatments with dosage that is incompatible with current clinical contexts. Pragmatic, implementation-focused trials are recommended to evaluate and optimize treatment effectiveness in outpatient clinical settings. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.15161568.
Asunto(s)
Afasia , Calidad de Vida , Afasia/diagnóstico , Afasia/terapia , Comunicación , Atención a la Salud , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with aphasia can present a type of acalculia referred to as aphasic acalculia. AIMS: To investigate the correlation and to test regression models for one- and two-digit calculation skills using verbal and nonverbal predictors. METHODS AND PROCEDURES: We selected an aphasia sample of 119 men and 81 women with a mean age of 57.37 years (SD = 15.56) and an average level of education of 13.52 years (SD = 4.08). Spanish versions of the Western Aphasia Battery and Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination, plus a Written Calculation test, were individually administered. The calculation section of the Western Aphasia Battery and the Written Calculation tests were used to pinpoint calculation difficulties. OUTCOMES AND RESULTS: Calculation difficulties were more severe in Global and Mixed non-fluent aphasia; they were very similar in Broca, Conduction, and Amnesic Aphasia. All correlations between the two calculation subtests and the other subtests of the Western Aphasia Battery were statistically significant. Calculation subtests correlated negatively with age and positively with schooling. Sex and time post-onset did not show any correlation with the calculation scores. Education, Reading, Block Design, and Raven's Colored Progressive Matrices were significant predictors of Western Aphasia Battery Calculation. Writing was the only significant predictor of the Written Calculation scores. CONCLUSIONS: Nonverbal abilities were predictors of calculation tests, whereas agraphia defects were predictors of the Written Calculation test. Therefore, calculation abilities can be regarded both as written language-dependent and verbal language-independent.
Asunto(s)
Afasia , Discalculia , Afasia/diagnóstico , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Lenguaje , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pruebas NeuropsicológicasRESUMEN
Purpose Semantic feature analysis (SFA) is a naming treatment found to improve naming performance for both treated and semantically related untreated words in aphasia. A crucial treatment component is the requirement that patients generate semantic features of treated items. This article examined the role feature generation plays in treatment response to SFA in several ways: It attempted to replicate preliminary findings from Gravier et al. (2018), which found feature generation predicted treatment-related gains for both trained and untrained words. It examined whether feature diversity or the number of features generated in specific categories differentially affected SFA treatment outcomes. Method SFA was administered to 44 participants with chronic aphasia daily for 4 weeks. Treatment was administered to multiple lists sequentially in a multiple-baseline design. Participant-generated features were captured during treatment and coded in terms of feature category, total average number of features generated per trial, and total number of unique features generated per item. Item-level naming accuracy was analyzed using logistic mixed-effects regression models. Results Producing more participant-generated features was found to improve treatment response for trained but not untrained items in SFA, in contrast to Gravier et al. (2018). There was no effect of participant-generated feature diversity or any differential effect of feature category on SFA treatment outcomes. Conclusions Patient-generated features remain a key predictor of direct training effects and overall treatment response in SFA. Aphasia severity was also a significant predictor of treatment outcomes. Future work should focus on identifying potential nonresponders to therapy and explore treatment modifications to improve treatment outcomes for these individuals. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.12462596.
Asunto(s)
Afasia , Semántica , Afasia/diagnóstico , Afasia/terapia , Generalización Psicológica , Humanos , Terapia del Lenguaje , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
En Chile, entre un 20% y un 38% de los usuarios que sufren un ataque cerebro-vascular (ACV) presentan afasia. Pese a su alta prevalencia no existen herramientas validadas que permitan realizar una caracterización lingüística temprana de la afasia. Por lo anterior, el objetivo del presente trabajo es analizar la sensibilidad y especificidad de la versión en español del ScreeLing en una muestra de usuarios afásicos después de producido un ACV. Se trata de un estudio transversal analítico en el cual se aplicó el test ScreeLing a 13 usuarios afásicos tras primer evento de ACV en etapa aguda (< 6 semanas tras ACV) y a 56 adultos neurológicamente sanos. Adicionalmente, se evaluó el nivel comprensivo y el lenguaje espontáneo de usuarios con afasia, con la versión abreviada del Token Test y Escala de Severidad de la Afasia (ASRS). Se construyeron modelos mediante regresiones logísticas, obteniendo sus respectivas áreas bajo la curva ROC. Los resultados muestran que el equilibrio entre sensibilidad y especificidad para el puntaje global del test ScreeLing se estableció en 67 puntos, obteniendo una sensibilidad del 94,6% y especificidad del 100%. El área bajo la curva ROC alcanzó 0,99 (IC 95%: 0,97-1,00). En las subpruebas sintáctica y fonológica se alcanzó un puntaje de corte de 21 puntos, mientras que en la subprueba semántica se lograron 22 puntos. Se concluye que el ScreeLing en español posee una alta sensibilidad y especificidad para la detección de déficits lingüísticos post ACV similar a los resultados encontrados en la versión original del test en holandés. Esfuerzos futuros deben concentrarse en ampliar la muestra de usuarios afásicos con distintos perfiles de severidad.
In Chile, aphasia is present in 20% to 30% of stroke patients. Currently, speech and language therapists do not have a standardized test to characterize aphasic patients' linguistics disorders at the acute phase. The aim of this study iso analyze the sensibility and specificity of the Spanish version of the ScreeLing test in aphasic patient post-stroke at the acute stage. To do so, in a transversal study design, acute aphasic patients (< 6 weeks post-stroke) and healthy adults were evaluated with the Spanish version of the ScreeLing test. Additionally, language comprehension and spontaneous speech were assessed with the shortened version of the Token Test and the Aphasia Severity Rating Scale, respectively. We calculated the Area Under ROC Curve (AUC) to choose the cut-off that provided the best balance between sensibility and specificity. We included 13 aphasic patients and 56 healthy adults. The best balance between sensibility and specificity was found to be with 67 points, with a sensibility of 94,6% andspecificity of 100%. The AUC ROC was 0,99 (IC 95%: 0,97-1,00). For the subtest measuring syntax and phonology, the cut-off score was 21 points, and for the semantic subtest, 22 points. In conclusion, the Spanish version of the ScreeLing test, similar to its original Dutch version, demonstrated high specificity and sensibility to detect linguistic deficits in acute aphasic patients post-stroke. Future efforts aim to increase the sample size of patients considering differentlanguage severity profiles.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Afasia/diagnóstico , Pruebas del Lenguaje , Afasia/etiología , Semántica , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Chile , Estudios Transversales , Curva ROC , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , ComprensiónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to cross culturally adapt the Protocol for the Exploration of Natural Metalinguistic Skills in Aphasia (MetAphAs), contributing to the future application in the aphasic Chilean population. METHOD: The sample corresponds to 72 healthy subjects in the region of Valparaíso, between the ages of 50 to 85. The MetAphAs measures natural metalinguistic skills and presents the basic elements on which to base the exploration of the metacognitive dimensions involved in verbal behavior. The validity was ascertained by means of Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient, including the values of each of the 6 sections; the correlations between variables were analyzed by the Pearson coefficient. RESULTS: We observed that 64% of the sample corresponded to the female and 36% to the male gender, with predominant age ranging from 61 to 70 years. We verified adequate correlation between the variables according to the Pearson coefficient, and highly positive values according to Cronbach's Alpha. CONCLUSION: The use of the protocol is viable, with data demonstrating high reliability. The results evidenced high liability, which encourages the continuation process of its validation with Chilean aphasic population.
OBJETIVO: El objetivo de este estudio fue adaptar transculturalmente el Protocolo de Exploración de Habilidades Metalingüísticas Naturales en Afasia (MetAphAs), contribuyendo a la aplicación futura del instrumento en la población afásica chilena. MÉTODO: la muestra corresponde a 72 individuos sanos de la región de Valparaíso, de 50 a 85 años. El Protocolo MetAphAs mide las habilidades metalingüísticas naturales y presenta los elementos básicos en los que debe basarse una exploración de la dimensión metacognitiva involucrada en el comportamiento verbal. La validez se verificó mediante el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach, incluidos los valores de cada una de las 6 secciones; las correlaciones entre las variables fueron analizadas por el coeficiente de Pearson. RESULTADOS: el 64% de la muestra correspondió a mujeres y el 36% a hombres, con el mayor grupo de edad de participación de 61 a 70 años; se verifica una correlación adecuada entre las variables según el coeficiente de Pearson y los valores altamente positivos según el alfa de Cronbach. CONCLUSIÓN: el uso del protocolo fue factible y relevante, con datos que demostraron una alta confiabilidad. Los resultados obtenidos y las ventajas indicadas alientan el uso de este tipo de instrumento como una opción viable para la validación en afásicos chilenos.
Asunto(s)
Afasia , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Afasia/diagnóstico , Chile , Femenino , Humanos , Lingüística , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
Purpose We report on a study that replicates previous treatment studies using Abstract Semantic Associative Network Training (AbSANT), which was developed to help persons with aphasia improve their ability to retrieve abstract words, as well as thematically related concrete words. We hypothesized that previous results would be replicated; that is, when abstract words are trained using this protocol, improvement would be observed for both abstract and concrete words in the same context-category, but when concrete words are trained, no improvement for abstract words would be observed. We then frame the results of this study with the results of previous studies that used AbSANT to provide better evidence for the utility of this therapeutic technique. We also discuss proposed mechanisms of AbSANT. Method Four persons with aphasia completed one phase of concrete word training and one phase of abstract word training using the AbSANT protocol. Effect sizes were calculated for each word type for each phase. Effect sizes for this study are compared with the effect sizes from previous studies. Results As predicted, training abstract words resulted in both direct training and generalization effects, whereas training concrete words resulted in only direct training effects. The reported results are consistent across studies. Furthermore, when the data are compared across studies, there is a distinct pattern of the added benefit of training abstract words using AbSANT. Conclusion Treatment for word retrieval in aphasia is most often aimed at concrete words, despite the usefulness and pervasiveness of abstract words in everyday conversation. We show the utility of AbSANT as a means of improving not only abstract word retrieval but also concrete word retrieval and hope this evidence will help foster its application in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Afasia , Semántica , Afasia/diagnóstico , Afasia/terapia , Generalización Psicológica , HumanosRESUMEN
Purpose The purpose of this study was to verify the equivalence of 2 alternate test forms with nonoverlapping content generated by an item response theory (IRT)-based computer-adaptive test (CAT). The Philadelphia Naming Test (PNT; Roach, Schwartz, Martin, Grewal, & Brecher, 1996)was utilized as an item bank in a prospective, independent sample of persons with aphasia. Method Two alternate CAT short forms of the PNT were administered to a sample of 25 persons with aphasia who were at least 6 months postonset and received no treatment for 2 weeks before or during the study. The 1st session included administration of a 30-item PNT-CAT, and the 2nd session, conducted approximately 2 weeks later, included a variable-length PNT-CAT that excluded items administered in the 1st session and terminated when the modeled precision of the ability estimate was equal to or greater than the value obtained in the 1st session. The ability estimates were analyzed in a Bayesian framework. Results The 2 test versions correlated highly (r = .89) and obtained means and standard deviations that were not credibly different from one another. The correlation and error variance between the 2 test versions were well predicted by the IRT measurement model. Discussion The results suggest that IRT-based CAT alternate forms may be productively used in the assessment of anomia. IRT methods offer advantages for the efficient and sensitive measurement of change over time. Future work should consider the potential impact of differential item functioning due to person factors and intervention-specific effects, as well as expanding the item bank to maximize the clinical utility of the test. Supplemental Material https://doi.org/10.23641/asha.11368040.
Asunto(s)
Anomia/diagnóstico , Afasia/diagnóstico , Diagnóstico por Computador/normas , Pruebas del Lenguaje/normas , Anciano , Teorema de Bayes , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Background Evaluating patients in the acute phase of brain damage allows for the early detection of cognitive and linguistic impairments and the implementation of more effective interventions. However, few cross-cultural instruments are available for the bedside assessment of language abilities. The aim of this study was to develop a brief assessment instrument and evaluate its content validity. Methods Stimuli for the new assessment instrument were selected from the M1-Alpha and MTL-BR batteries (Stage 1). Sixty-five images were redesigned and analyzed by non-expert judges (Stage 2). This was followed by the analysis of expert judges (Stage 3), where nine speech pathologists with doctoral training and experience in aphasiology and/or linguistics evaluated the images, words, nonwords, and phrases for inclusion in the instrument. Two pilot studies (Stage 4) were then conducted in order to identify any remaining errors in the instrument and scoring instructions. Results Sixty of the 65 figures examined by the judges achieved inter-rater agreement rates of at least 80%. Modifications were suggested to 22 images, which were therefore reanalyzed by the judges, who reached high levels of inter-rater agreement (AC1 = 0.98 [CI = 0.96-1]). New types of stimuli such as nonwords and irregular words were also inserted in the Brief Battery and favorably evaluated by the expert judges. Optional tasks were also developed for specific diagnostic situations. After the correction of errors detected in Stage 4, the final version of the instrument was obtained. Conclusion This study confirmed the content validity of the Brief MTL-BR Battery. The method used in this investigation was effective and can be used in future studies to develop brief instruments based on preexisting assessment batteries.
Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Afasia/diagnóstico , Traducciones , Lesiones Encefálicas/complicaciones , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Pruebas Neuropsicológicas , Brasil , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Fonoaudiología/métodos , LenguajeRESUMEN
RESUMEN Objetivo: El objetivo de este estudio fue adaptar transculturalmente el Protocolo de Exploración de Habilidades Metalingüísticas Naturales en Afasia (MetAphAs), contribuyendo a la aplicación futura del instrumento en la población afásica chilena. Método: la muestra corresponde a 72 individuos sanos de la región de Valparaíso, de 50 a 85 años. El Protocolo MetAphAs mide las habilidades metalingüísticas naturales y presenta los elementos básicos en los que debe basarse una exploración de la dimensión metacognitiva involucrada en el comportamiento verbal. La validez se verificó mediante el coeficiente alfa de Cronbach, incluidos los valores de cada una de las 6 secciones; las correlaciones entre las variables fueron analizadas por el coeficiente de Pearson. Resultados: el 64% de la muestra correspondió a mujeres y el 36% a hombres, con el mayor grupo de edad de participación de 61 a 70 años; se verifica una correlación adecuada entre las variables según el coeficiente de Pearson y los valores altamente positivos según el alfa de Cronbach. Conclusión: el uso del protocolo fue factible y relevante, con datos que demostraron una alta confiabilidad. Los resultados obtenidos y las ventajas indicadas alientan el uso de este tipo de instrumento como una opción viable para la validación en afásicos chilenos.
ABSTRACT Purpose: This study aimed to cross culturally adapt the Protocol for the Exploration of Natural Metalinguistic Skills in Aphasia (MetAphAs), contributing to the future application in the aphasic Chilean population. Method: The sample corresponds to 72 healthy subjects in the region of Valparaíso, between the ages of 50 to 85. The MetAphAs measures natural metalinguistic skills and presents the basic elements on which to base the exploration of the metacognitive dimensions involved in verbal behavior. The validity was ascertained by means of Cronbach's Alpha Coefficient, including the values of each of the 6 sections; the correlations between variables were analyzed by the Pearson coefficient. Results: We observed that 64% of the sample corresponded to the female and 36% to the male gender, with predominant age ranging from 61 to 70 years. We verified adequate correlation between the variables according to the Pearson coefficient, and highly positive values according to Cronbach's Alpha. Conclusion: The use of the protocol is viable, with data demonstrating high reliability. The results evidenced high liability, which encourages the continuation process of its validation with Chilean aphasic population.