Clinical comprehensive of microfracture, autologous chondrocyte implantation, and periosteum-covered iliac bone grafting for Hepple stage IV-V lesions.

Chronic ankle pain significantly impairs daily activities and athletic performance with osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) in Hepple stages IV and V, which are often causative factors. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of autologous osteochondral transplantation (AOT) for the treatment of these conditions. This retrospective study was conducted from May 2020 to May 2023 at Cangzhou Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Combined Hospital, including patients with a diagnosis of Hepple stage IV or V OLT confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and arthroscopy. Surgical interventions involved arthroscopic debridement, followed by AOT or limited arthrotomy based on the location and size of the lesion. Preoperative and postoperative evaluations used the Visual Analog Scale, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Ankle-Hindfoot Scale, MRI-Based Cartilage Repair Tissue Scoring, and the International Knee Documentation Committee Knee Evaluation Form. Statistical analysis was conducted using paired-sample t tests to compare the preoperative and postoperative data. Twenty patients were included, revealing significant postoperative improvements in Visual Analog Scale, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society, and MRI-based cartilage repair tissue scores (P < .05). The radiographic findings suggested effective cartilage regeneration. No adverse effects were observed in the donor knee sites, as confirmed by the stable pre- and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee Knee Evaluation Form scores. Recovery of physical abilities was achieved on average within 7.3 weeks for daily activities and 13.4 weeks for sports activities. AOT effectively treats Hepple stage IV-V OLT, improves ankle function, promotes cartilage regrowth, and allows quick resumption of daily and athletic activities without compromising donor-site integrity.

A comparative analysis of 3D bioprinted gelatin-hyaluronic acid-alginate scaffold and microfracture for the management of osteochondral defects in the rabbit knee joint.

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to compare the radiological, biomechanical, and histopathological results of microfracture treatment and osteochondral damage repair treatment with a new scaffold product produced by the three-dimensional (3D) bioprinting method containing gelatin-hyaluronic acid-alginate in rabbits with osteochondral damage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A new 3D bioprinted scaffold consisting of gelatin, hyaluronic acid, and alginate designed by us was implanted into the osteochondral defect created in the femoral trochlea of 10 rabbits. By randomization, it was determined which side of 10 rabbits would be repaired with a 3D bioprinted scaffold, and microfracture treatment was applied to the other knees of the rabbits. After six months of follow-up, the rabbits were sacrificed. The results of both treatment groups were compared radiologically, biomechanically, and histopathologically. RESULTS: None of the rabbits experienced any complications. The magnetic resonance imaging evaluation showed that all osteochondral defect areas were integrated with healthy cartilage in both groups. There was no significant difference between the groups in the biomechanical load test (p=0.579). No statistically significant difference was detected in the histological examination using the modified Wakitani scores (p=0.731). CONCLUSION: Our study results showed that 3D bioprinted scaffolds exhibited comparable radiological, biomechanical, and histological properties to the conventional microfracture technique for osteochondral defect treatment.

Arthroscopic debridement and microfracture for bilateral osteochondral lesions on the lateral process of the talus involving the subtalar joint: A case report.

RATIONALE: Osteochondral lesions on the lateral process of the talus involving the subtalar joint are rare; the optimal surgical treatment remains to be clarified as there are few reports. Additionally, bilateral cases are extremely rare. Therefore, the clinical outcomes of the surgical treatment for bilateral osteochondral lesions on the lateral process of the talus involving the subtalar joint have not been fully elucidated. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 16-year-old boy who played soccer presented to our hospital with bilateral hindfoot pain. The symptoms persisted even after 3 months of conservative treatment. The patient and family requested surgical treatment to relieve the symptoms. DIAGNOSES: The patient was diagnosed with bilateral osteochondral lesions on the lateral process of the talus, involving the subtalar joint based on computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings. INTERVENTIONS: Arthroscopic debridement and microfracture were performed bilaterally. OUTCOMES: Postoperative computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of both feet revealed remodeling of the subchondral bone. The patient returned to play at the pre-injury level with no pain. LESSONS: This report describes a case of bilateral osteochondral lesions on the lateral process of the talus, involving the subtalar joint. Arthroscopic debridement and microfracture were effective in relieving symptoms and the subchondral bone remodeling. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report of arthroscopic treatment of osteochondral lesions of the lateral process of the talus involving the subtalar joint.

A randomized controlled trial demonstrating sustained benefit of autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC®) over microfracture: 10-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC®) and microfracture are established treatments for focal chondral defects in the knee, but there are little clinical data concerning these procedures over the long term. This study evaluates the outcomes of AMIC® compared to microfracture over 10-year follow-up. METHODS: Forty-seven patients were randomized and treated either with MFx (n = 13), sutured AMIC® (n = 17) or glued AMIC® (n = 17) in a prospective, randomized, controlled multicentre trial. The Modified Cincinnati Knee Score, a visual analogue scale for pain and MOCART score were used to assess outcomes over 10 years post-operatively. RESULTS: All treatment arms improved in the first 2 years, but a progressive and significant deterioration in scores was observed in the MFx group, while both AMIC® groups remained stable. MOCART scores were comparable between groups. CONCLUSION: The AMIC® procedure results in improved patient outcomes in comparison with microfracture up to 10 years following surgery for the repair of focal chondral defects in the knee. CLINICALTRIALS: gov Identifier: NCT02993510.

Comparison of Arthroscopic Microfracture for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus With and Without Small and Shallow Subchondral Cysts.

BACKGROUND: Whether arthroscopic microfracture is effective in treating cystic osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLTs) remains controversial. In this study, outcome parameters in patients with small and shallow subchondral cysts are compared to patients without cysts with the hypothesis that equivalent outcomes may be found after primary microfracture treatment. METHODS: From 2018 to 2021, all 50 OLTs treated with arthroscopic microfracture in the authors' hospital were retrospectively reviewed for eligibility. Single unilateral symptomatic lesions were included and divided into the cyst and noncyst groups, whereas kissing lesions and arthritic lesions were excluded. Numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scores, Tegner activity level scores, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) scores, and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging results were used to describe outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 35 patients were included, 16 in the cyst group and 19 in the noncyst group. The patient characteristics were similar between the 2 groups (P > .05). In the cyst group the average cysts depth was 5.0 ± 1.3 mm. After a mean follow-up duration of 36.2 ± 10.2 months, no significant differences were found between the 2 groups in NRS, AOFAS, FAAM, or Tegner score improvement (P > .05). Three patients (19%) in the cyst group had no NRS score improvement. CONCLUSION: OLTs with small and shallow subchondral cysts can be treated with arthroscopic microfracture and achieve similar outcomes as noncystic lesions. A few cystic lesions may not respond to microfracture treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective comparative study.

Mid-term outcomes of microfracture for the treatment of focal, full-thickness cartilage defects isolated to the humeral head.

BACKGROUND: While microfracture has been shown to be an effective treatment for chondral lesions in the knee, evidence to support its use for chondral defects in the shoulder is limited to short-term outcomes studies. The purpose of this study is to determine if microfracture provides pain relief and improved shoulder function in patients with isolated focal chondral defects of the humeral head at a minimum 5-year follow-up. METHODS: Patients who underwent microfracture procedure for isolated focal chondral defects of the humeral head with a minimum follow-up of 5 years between 02/2006 and 08/2016 were included. At minimum 5-year follow-up, pre- and postoperative patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures were collected, including the American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH), Short Form-12 (SF-12) Physical Component Summary (PCS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain, and patient satisfaction level (1 = unsatisfied, 10 = very satisfied). Demographic, injury, and surgical data were retrospectively reviewed. Surgical failure was defined as revision surgery for humeral chondral defects or conversion to arthroplasty. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to determine survivorship at 5 years. RESULTS: A total of 17 patients met inclusion/exclusion criteria. There were 15 men and 2 women with an average age of 51 years (range 36-69) and an average follow-up of 9.4 years (range 5.0-15.8). The median ASES score improved from 62 (range: 22-88) preoperatively to 90 (range: 50-100) postoperatively (P = .011). Median satisfaction was 8 out of 10 (range: 2-10). There was no correlation between patient age or defect size and PROs. Postoperatively, patients reported significant improvements in recreational and sporting activity as well as the ability to sleep on the affected shoulder (P ≤ .05). Three patients failed and required revision surgery. The Kaplan-Meier analysis determined an overall survivorship rate of 80% at 5 years. CONCLUSION: The presented study illustrates significant improvements for PROs, improved ability to perform recreational and sporting activities, and a survival rate of 80% at a mean of 9.4 years after microfracture for focal chondral humeral head defects.

Subchondral Drilling Independent of Drill Hole Number Improves Articular Cartilage Repair and Reduces Subchondral Bone Alterations Compared With Debridement in Adult Sheep.

BACKGROUND: Subchondral drilling is an established marrow stimulation technique for small cartilage defects, but whether drilling is required at all and if the drill hole density affects repair remains unclear. HYPOTHESES: Osteochondral repair is improved when the subchondral bone is perforated by a higher number of drill holes per unit area, and drilling is superior to defect debridement alone. STUDY DESIGN: Controlled laboratory study. METHODS: Rectangular full-thickness chondral defects (4 × 8 mm) were created in the trochlea of adult sheep (N = 16), debrided down to the subchondral bone plate without further treatment as controls (no treatment; n = 7) or treated with either 2 or 6 (n = 7 each) subchondral drill holes (diameter, 1.0 mm; depth, 10.0 mm). Osteochondral repair was assessed at 6 months postoperatively by standardized (semi-)quantitative macroscopic, histological, immunohistochemical, biochemical, and micro-computed tomography analyses. RESULTS: Compared with defect debridement alone, histological overall cartilaginous repair tissue quality (P = .025) and the macroscopic aspect of the adjacent cartilage (P≤ .032) were improved after both drilling densities. Only drilling with 6 holes increased type 2 collagen content in the repair tissue compared with controls (P = .038). After debridement, bone mineral density was significantly decreased in the subchondral bone plate (P≤ .015) and the subarticular spongiosa (P≤ .041) compared with both drilling groups. Debridement also significantly increased intralesional osteophyte sectional area compared with drilling (P≤ .034). No other differences in osteochondral repair existed between subchondral drilling with 6 or 2 drill holes. CONCLUSION: Subchondral drilling independent of drill hole density significantly improves structural cartilage repair compared with sole defect debridement of full-thickness cartilage defects in sheep after 6 months. Subchondral drilling also leads to a better reconstitution of the subchondral bone compartment below the defects. Simultaneously, drilling reduced the formation of intralesional osteophytes caused by osseous overgrowth compared with debridement. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: These results have important clinical implications, as they support subchondral drilling independent of drill hole number but discourage debridement alone for the treatment of small cartilage defects. Clinical studies are warranted to further quantify the effects of subchondral drilling in similar settings.

Clinical outcomes after arthroscopic microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the talus are better in patients with decreased postoperative subchondral bone marrow edema.

PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings of subchondral bone marrow edema (SBME) in osteochondral lesions of the talus (OLT) after arthroscopic microfracture are associated with poor clinical outcomes. However, the relationship between SBME volume change and clinical outcomes has not been analyzed. It was hypothesized that clinical outcomes correlated with SBME volume change and extent of cartilage regeneration in patients with OLT. METHODS: 64 patients who underwent arthroscopic microfracture for OLT were followed up for more than 2 years. SBME volume change was measured by comparing preoperative and 2-year follow-up MRI. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and the American orthopedic foot and ankle society ankle-hindfoot scale (AOFAS) at the 2-year and final follow-up. To compare clinical outcomes, patients were categorized into two groups: decreased SBME (DSBME) group (cases without SBME on either MRI or with a decreased SBME volume between the MRIs) and increased SBME (ISBME) group (cases with new SBME on postoperative MRI or with an increased SBME volume between the MRIs). Additionally, the effects of age, sex, body mass index, symptom duration, OLT size, OLT location, containment/uncontainment, preoperative subchondral cysts, pre- and postoperative SBME volumes, and MRI observation of cartilage repair tissue score on clinical outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: The DSBME group included 45 patients, whereas the ISBME group included 19. The mean age was 40.1 ± 17.2 years, and mean follow-up period was 35.7 ± 18.3 months. Preoperative SBME volume was significantly higher in the DSBME group, while the ISBME group had higher volumes at the final follow-up. In both groups, the VAS and AOFAS scores significantly improved at the final follow-up (p < 0.001, < 0.001). The VAS scores were significantly lower in the DSBME group at the 2-year and final follow-up (p = 0.004, 0.011), while the AOFAS scores were significantly higher (p = 0.019, 0.028). Other factors including cartilage regeneration did not affect clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: SBME volume change correlated with clinical outcomes after arthroscopic microfracture for OLT. Clinical outcomes were worse in patients with new postoperative SBME and increased postoperative SBME volume. In patients with an unsatisfactory clinical course that show decreased SBME via postoperative MRI, an extended follow-up in a conservative manner could be considered. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The Benefit of Minced Cartilage Over Isolated Chondrocytes in Atelocollagen Gel on Chondrocyte Proliferation and Migration.

OBJECTIVE: Autologous chondrocyte implantation is a necessary procedure for the repair of articular cartilage defects; however, isolated chondrocyte implantation requires a 2-step procedure (for harvesting and implantation) and is limited by cytotoxicity due to enzymatic digestion. Therefore, in this in vitro study, we evaluated the possible benefit of using minced cartilage embedded in a 3-dimensional culture scaffold and fixed with fibrin glue, in comparison with isolated chondrocytes in atelocollagen, to induce cell migration, proliferation, and matrix production, using cartilage from patients with knee joint osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Cartilage fragments were obtained from 7 female patients with knee osteoarthritis (OA) and embedded in atelocollagen gels. As a control, chondrocytes were isolated and embedded in gels in the same manner. These composites were cultured for 3 weeks, and cell proliferation and matrix production were evaluated using histology and immunochemistry. RESULTS: Histologically, minced cartilage showed cell migration from the cartilage fragments into the gel, with the Bern score and cell count in the minced cartilage group being significantly higher than those in the control group. Immunohistochemistry revealed that the number of Ki67-positive cells, the expression of LECT-1 and TGF-ß, and the glycosaminoglycan content were significantly higher in the minced cartilage than in the control group. Minced cartilage exhibited superior cell migration, proliferation, and glycosaminoglycan content than isolated chondrocytes. CONCLUSION: Our findings support that minced cartilage has a favorable potential for cell proliferation and matrix production compared with the isolated chondrocytes after enzymatic treatment.

Long-Term Retrospective Follow-Up of Fresh Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation for Steroid-Associated Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Condyles.

OBJECTIVE: No studies currently exist with long-term follow-up of use of osteochondral allografting (OCA) for treatment of steroid-associated osteonecrosis of femoral condyles in young, active patients who wish to avoid total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We evaluate the extent to which fresh osteochondral allografts can (1) prevent or postpone need for prosthetic arthroplasty and (2) maintain long-term clinically meaningful decrease in pain and improvement in function at mean 11-year follow-up. DESIGN: Twenty-five patients (33 knees) who underwent OCA transplantation for osteonecrosis of the knee between 1984 and 2013 were evaluated, including 22 females and 11 males with average age of 25 years (range, 16-48 years). Mean total allograft surface area was 10.6 cm2 (range, 4.0-19.0 cm2). Evaluation included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores, Knee Society function (KS-F) score, and modified (for the knee) Merle d'Aubigné-Postel (18-point) score. RESULTS: OCA survivorship was 90% at 5 years and 82% at 10 years. Twenty-eight of 33 knees (85%) avoided arthroplasty and 25 of 33 knees (73%) avoided other surgical intervention. Mean IKDC pain score improved (P = 0.001) from 7.2 preoperatively to 2.8 at latest follow-up, mean IKDC function score increased (P = 0.005) from 3.3 to 6.5, and mean IKDC total score improved (P = 0.001) from 31.9 to 61.1. Mean KS-F score improved (P = 0.003) from 61.7 to 87.5. Mean modified Merle d'Aubigné-Postel (18-point) score improved (P < 0.001) from 11.4 to 15.1. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that OCA transplantation is a reasonable surgical treatment option for steroid-associated osteonecrosis of the femoral condyles, with durable long-term outcomes.

Wide Variation in Methodology in Level I and II Studies on Cartilage Repair: A Systematic Review of Available Clinical Trials Comparing Patient Demographics, Treatment Means, and Outcomes Reporting.

BACKGROUND: The management of complex cartilage pathology in young, otherwise healthy patients can be difficult. PURPOSE: To determine the nature of the design, endpoints chosen, and rate at which the endpoints were met in published studies and ongoing clinical trials that investigate cartilage repair and restoration procedures. STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. METHODS: A systematic review of the publicly available level I/II literature and of the publicly listed clinical trials regarding cartilage repair and restoration procedures for the knee was conducted adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. RESULTS: Seventeen published studies and 52 clinical trials were included. Within the 17 published studies, the most common procedure studied was microfracture (MFX) + augmentation (N = 5; 29.4%) and the most common comparison/control group was MFX (N = 10; 58.8%). In total, 13 different cartilage procedure groups were evaluated. For published studies, the most common patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures assessed is the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and Visual Analog Scale-Pain (VAS) (N = 10 studies, 58.8% each, respectively). Overall, there are 10 different PROs used among the included studies. Ten studies demonstrate superiority, 5 demonstrate noninferiority, and 2 demonstrate inferiority to the comparison or control groups. For the clinical trials included, the most common procedure studied is MFX + augmentation (N = 16; 30.8%). The most common PRO assessed is KOOS (N = 36 trials; 69.2%), and overall there are 24 different PROs used among the included studies. CONCLUSIONS: Recently published studies and clinical trials evaluate a variety of cartilage repair and restoration strategies for the knee, most commonly MFX + augmentation, at various time points of outcome evaluation, with KOOS and VAS scores being used most commonly. MFX remains the most common comparison group for these therapeutic investigations. Most studies demonstrate superiority versus comparison or control groups. Understanding the nature of published and ongoing clinical trials will be helpful in the investigation of emerging technologies required to navigate the regulatory process while studying a relatively narrow population of patients.

Safety, Feasibility, and Radiographic Outcomes of the Anterior Meniscal Takedown Technique to Approach Chondral Defects on the Tibia and Posterior Femoral Condyle: A Matched Control Study.

OBJECTIVE: Takedown of the anterior meniscus to facilitate exposure of the cartilage defects located on the tibial plateau and/or posterior femoral condyle with subsequent reattachment is being performed clinically; however, clinical evidence is lacking to support the safety of this technique. The aim of this study was therefore to investigate whether meniscal extrusion develops after patients undergo meniscus takedown and transosseous refixation during autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI). DESIGN: We analyzed data from 124 patients with a mean follow-up of 6.8 ± 2.5 years. Sixty-two patients who underwent (ACI) with anterior meniscus takedown and refixation by the senior surgeon (TM), were compared with a matched control group of patients who underwent ACI without meniscus takedown. Meniscal extrusion was investigated by measuring the absolute value and the relative percentage of extrusion (RPE) on 1.5-T magnetic resonance images (MRI) at final follow-up. The number of menisci with radial displacement greater or lesser than 3 mm was determined. In cases where a preoperative MRI was available, both pre- and postoperative meniscal extrusion was evaluated (n = 30) in those patients undergoing meniscal takedown. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in either absolute meniscus extrusion, RPE, or extrusion rate in patients with and without meniscus takedown. Among patients with meniscal takedown and both pre- and postoperative MRI scans, absolute meniscus extrusion, RPE, and extrusion rate showed no significant differences. CONCLUSION: Meniscal takedown and subsequent transosseous refixation is a safe and effective technique for exposure of the tibial plateau and posterior femoral condyle.

Evolution of a Novel Tissue Preservation Protocol to Optimize Osteochondral Transplantation Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: Osteochondral allograft transplantation is a procedure to treat focal osteochondral lesions (OCLs), but is limited by tissue availability, the quality of transplanted tissue, and inconsistent storage protocols. The objective of this study was to assess the clinical outcomes of a novel tissue procurement, storage, and quality control protocol in treating OCLs. DESIGN: Prospective case series. Donor cadaveric tissue was processed, stored, and the tissue quality analyzed using the unique tissue preservation protocol developed at our institution. Advanced cross-sectional imaging was used to size match donor tissue with recipient patients. Osteochondral allografts were transplanted using the Arthrex Allograft OATS. Patients were evaluated with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), visual analog scale (VAS), and 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) preoperatively and at 1 year and 2 years postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty patients (17 knees, 3 shoulders) were included in the study. There was a significant improvement in the following scores: overall WOMAC score, WOMAC function and pain subcategories; KOOS pain, knee-related symptoms, activities of daily living, sports and recreation, and quality of life; SF-36 physical functioning, physical role, pain, and social functioning subcategories; and VAS at all time points postoperatively. There was a significant improvement in WOMAC stiffness at 2 years postoperatively. There were 2 failures, defined by graft subsidence and persistent pain requiring reoperation. CONCLUSION: The protocol developed at our institution for OAT resulted in significant clinical improvement in patients with OCLs and is an improvement on existing tissue storage techniques.

The Minimal Clinically Important Difference and Substantial Clinical Benefit in the Patient-Reported Outcome Measures of Patients Undergoing Osteochondral Allograft Transplantation in the Knee.

OBJECTIVE: Little is known regarding the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB) with regard to the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Lysholm score, and Short Form 12 (SF-12) score of patients who undergo osteochondral allograft transplantation (OCA). We aimed to determine the MCID and SCB associated with those patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after OCA. DESIGN: We analyzed the data of 86 consecutive patients who underwent OCA and who completed satisfaction surveys at a minimum of 1 year postoperatively and had at least one repeated PROM. MCID was determined using an anchor-based method: the optimal cutoff point for receiver operative characteristic (ROC) curves. If an anchor-based method was inapplicable, distribution-based methods were employed. SCB was determined using ROC curve analysis. RESULTS: Based on the ROC curve analysis, MCID was 16.7 for KOOS pain, 25 for KOOS sports/recreation, and 9.8 for IKDC. SCB was 27.7 for KOOS pain, 10.7 for KOOS symptom, 30 for KOOS sports/recreation, 31.3 for KOOS quality of life, 26.9 for IKDC, 25 for Lysholm, and 12.1 for SF-12 physical component summary. No significant association was noted between SCB achievement and the baseline patient factors and baseline PROMs. CONCLUSION: We demonstrated the MCIDs and SCBs of several PROMs in patients undergoing OCA. These results will aid the interpretation of the effect of treatment and clinical trial settings. Moreover, the SCBs will help surgeons in the counseling of patients, where patients expect optimal results rather than minimal improvement.

An In Vitro Study to Determine the Feasibility of Combining Bone Marrow Concentrate with BST-CarGel as a Treatment for Cartilage Repair.

OBJECTIVE: The study aims were to determine whether BST-CarGel, a chitosan scaffold for cartilage repair, can be mixed with bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) to create a cell seeded implant with comparative properties to standard BST-CarGel mixed with blood. DESIGN: Whole blood and bone marrow were harvested from 12 patients who underwent cartilage repair surgery using BMAC after informed consent. A validated in vitro testing model was used to assess the following 6 conditions: (1) BST-CarGel mixed with whole blood (CG-WB), (2) BST-CarGel mixed with bone marrow (CG-BM), (3) BST-CarGel mixed with bone marrow concentrate (CG-BMAC), (4) whole blood (WB), (5) bone marrow (BM), and (6) bone marrow concentrate and batroxobin (BMAC-BTX). Cell retention and viability within the BST-CarGel/BMAC clots were investigated. RESULTS: In our study, BM and BMAC (processed using the Harvest, SmartPrep2 system and reactivated with batroxibin) when combined with BST-CarGel produced a product that had similar clot contraction, macroscopic properties, and histological appearance to standard BSTCarGel mixed with blood. Mononucleated cells from the BMAC were retained within the scaffold and remained viable until clot dissolution in vitro. CONCLUSIONS: By combining BST-CarGel with BMAC in the manner described, bone marrow-derived mononucleated cells can be retained within the chondral defect potentially negating the need for microfracture. Further in vivo work is required to confirm these potential benefits and determine if this combination will result in more durable cartilage repair and improved clinical outcomes.

Promising radiological outcome after repair of acetabular chondral defects by microfracture augmented with chitosan-based scaffold: mid-term T2 mapping evaluation.

PURPOSE: Radiological evaluation of the repair tissue produced after arthroscopic treatment of acetabular chondral lesions associated with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) by the chitosan-based scaffold. METHODS: Patients of age 18-55 years with clinical and radiological features of FAI and non-arthritic non-dysplastic hips were selected for arthroscopic treatment. Full-thickness acetabular chondral defects were filled with chitosan-based scaffold material after microfracture. T2 mapping was carried out for all patients after 24 months using a 1.5-T machine. Nine regions of interest (ROIs) were localized from three consecutive sagittal slices including the area of repair. T2 relaxation times of ROIs in the repair area were compared with the corresponding posterior cartilage. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients, 17 men and 4 women, underwent arthroscopic treatment of full-thickness acetabular chondral defects with mean size of 3.6 ± 1 cm2 (range 2-6 cm2). Zone 2 was affected in all cases while zone 3 was involved in 13 cases. T2 relaxation values were collected from 189 ROIs for quantitative analysis. Within the peripheral repair area, the mean T2 value was 49.1 ± 7.2 ms (ms), while ROIs of the central repair area had mean T2 values of 50.2 ± 7.1 ms. Posterior cartilage showed mean T2 value of 46.2 ± 7.6 ms CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic microfracture of large full-thickness acetabular chondral defects with chitosan-based scaffold produced a homogenous repair tissue similar to the corresponding native cartilage of the same joint on quantitative T2 mapping at mid-term follow-up. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: augmentation of the microfracture by chitosan-based scaffold is a promising modality for treatment of large full-thickness acetabular defects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Clinical Evidence on the Use of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis in the Knee.

OBJECTIVE: A systematic review and meta-analysis of Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC®) outcomes for grade III/IV chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee treated with Chondro-Gide®. DESIGN: Studies with a minimum follow-up of 1 year providing clinical results of AMIC repair in the knee were included based on PRISMA guidelines (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses). Methodological quality was assessed by the modified Coleman Methodology Score (mCMS). The meta-analysis was comparing pain VAS (Visual Analog Scale), Lysholm score, and IKDC score (International Knee Documentation Committee) between baseline and follow-up after 1 or 2 years and after >3 years. RESULTS: Twelve studies (375 patients) were included. The mCMS demonstrated a suboptimal study design (ranking between 52 and 80). The mean age was 36.2 years (14-70 years). The mean defect size was 4.24 cm2 (0.8-22 cm2). The results from the random effects model indicated a clinically significant (P < 0.05) improvement of pain VAS from baseline to follow-up at year 1 to 2 of -4.02(confidence interval -4.37; -3.67), still significant after 3 years. Lysholm score at year 1 or 2 improved significantly and remained highly significant after 3 years. IKDC score showed highly significant improvement of 32.61 between 1 and 2 years versus baseline values maintained after 3 years. CONCLUSIONS: The AMIC procedure significantly improved the clinical status and functional scoring versus preoperative values. Evidence was obtained in a non-selected patient population, corresponding to real-life treatment of knee chondral and osteochondral defects. The evidence is sufficient to recommend AMIC in this indication.

Using apheresis-derived cells to augment microdrilling in the treatment of chondral defects in an ovine model.

The treatment of chondral defects using microdrilling often results in a mechanically weak fibrocartilagenous repair, rather than a more robust hyaline cartilage repair. Many different microfracture/microdrilling augmentation techniques have been described, including the use of cellular products to enhance healing. Autologous peripheral blood progenitor cells can be obtained via apheresis after administration of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) and have been used successfully to augment microdrilling in clinical patients. The objective of this study was to use apheresis-derived mononuclear blood cells to augment microdrilling treatment of a cartilage defect in an ovine model to determine the effect on healing. Forty adult female sheep were used in this study and were divided into a control group (microdrilling alone) and a treatment group (microdrilling, hyaluronic acid, and apheretic product). Outcome measurements included weight-bearing on the operated limb, macroscopic scoring of the joint, histology, and immunohistochemistry. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging was used to attempt to identify SPION-labeled cells from the apheretic product in the operated limbs. The results showed a significant increase in healing as measured by the modified O'Driscoll sore in the treated group. No evidence of homing of SPION-labeled cells to the defect was found and no correlation was found between the response to G-CSF administration or concentration of CD34+  and outcome. A correlation was found between healing and the concentration of white blood cells and peripheral blood mononuclear cell numbers in the apheretic product.

Subchondroplasty for Bone Marrow Lesions in the Arthritic Knee Results in Pain Relief and Improvement in Function.

Subchondroplasty is a relatively new joint preserving procedure, which involves the localized injection of calcium pyrophosphate bone substitute into the bone marrow lesion. The advent of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has greatly facilitated the identification of these bone marrow lesions. We investigated the clinical efficacy of subchondroplasty in the treatment of symptomatic bone marrow lesions in the knee, including knees with preexisting osteoarthritis. This study comprised of 12 patients whose knees were evaluated with standard radiographs and MRI to identify and localize the bone marrow lesions. They then underwent subchondroplasty under intraoperative radiographic guidance. Preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores, and Knee Injury and Arthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) were obtained. VAS scores improved significantly from 7.5 ± 1.8 before surgery to 5.2 ± 2.7 after surgery. This further improved to 2.1 ± 2.4 at the one-year follow-up. KOOS scores improved significantly from 38.5 ± 17.0 before surgery to 73.2 ± 19.0 at the one-year follow-up. WOMAC scores improved significantly from 47.8 ± 20.5 before surgery to 14.3 ± 13.2 at the one-year follow-up. Subchondroplasty offers an effective way to treat subchondral bone marrow lesions in the arthritic knee, resulting in improvement in symptoms and early return to activity. Long-term studies are required to evaluate if these benefits can last. This is a Level II study.

Extracorporeal shockwave therapy combined with multiple drilling and intramedullary drug injection for treating early-stage Femur Head Necrosis: Protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Early diagnosis and treatment of the osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH), a refractory disease, is imperative to prevent femoral head collapse; however, the existing solutions remain controversial. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) combined with multiple drilling and intramedullary drug injection, a novel cocktail therapy, as a randomized controlled trial (RCT) model to postulate an alternative therapy for patients with early-stage ONFH. METHODS: Femoral head necrosis patients aged 20 to 60 years with stage ARCO I-II were recruited. One hundred twenty eligible participants were randomized into four groups in a 1:1:1:1 ratio: extracorporeal shock wave therapy combined with multiple drilling and intramedullary drug injection (group EMI), extracorporeal shock wave therapy (group E), multiple drilling combined with intramedullary drug injection (group MI), and multiple drilling ("positive" control group; group M). The primary outcomes included effective rate, subchondral collapse rate of the femoral head, lesion size, and grade of bone marrow edema. Secondary outcomes included the Harris Hip Score and the visual analog scale. All outcomes were measured at the screening visit (baseline) and at the planned time intervals during treatment and follow-up, and the efficacy was statistically analyzed according to the intention-to-treat sub-populations and per-protocol sub-populations. OBJECTIVES: To examine the clinical efficacy of ESWT combined with multiple drilling and intramedullary drug injection to provide a safe and more effective method for treating early-stage ONFH. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR1900020888; Pre-results.