Evaluation of Prosthesis Satisfaction, Psychological Status, and Quality of Life in Lower-Extremity Amputee Patients: A Pilot Study.

BACKGROUND: There are various factors affecting the use of prostheses. This study was aimed to examine satisfaction, psychological state, quality of life, and the factors affecting these in individuals who use prostheses because of lower-extremity amputation. METHODS: Sixty-three patients were included in this study. Demographic data and features related amputation and prosthesis were recorded. Quality of life was evaluated with the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP), anxiety and depression levels were evaluated with the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), body image was evaluated by the Amputee Body Image Scale (ABIS), prosthesis satisfaction was evaluated with the Prosthesis Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ), and the relationship between them was examined. RESULTS: There was a positive correlation between all HADS scores, NHP-emotional reactions, NHP-sleep, NHP-social isolation, NHP-total, and ABIS (P < .05). A negative correlation was found between HADS-anxiety and PSQ results (r = -0.394, P = .003). A positive correlation was found between HADS-depression scores and NHP-pain, NHP-emotional reactions, NHP-social isolation, NHP-total, and ABIS (P < .05); and a negative correlation was found with PSQ questionnaire scores (r = -0.427, P = .001). There was a positive correlation between HADS-total scores and all parameters except NHP-energy level and ABIS (P < .05). A positive correlation was found between ABIS and all parameters except NHP-energy level (P < .05). A negative correlation was found between PSQ and NHP-social isolation, NHP-physical activity, and NHP-total scores (r = -0.312, P = 0.019; r = -0.312, P = .019; and r = -0.277, P = .039, respectively). The presence of residual extremity pain was found to be an effective factor on the psychological state (ß = 0.429, P = .001). The presence of residual limb pain and phantom pain were found to be effective factors on the prosthesis satisfaction (ß = -0.41, P = .001; and ß = -0.406, P = .001, respectively). The presence of residual extremity pain and anxiety level were found independent risk factors on the NHP (ß = -0.401, P = .006; and ß = -0.445, P = .006, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals using prostheses because of lower-extremity amputation should be examined in detail from various perspectives.

Utilization and Perception of Peer-Support After Lower Limb Loss in the United States: Potential Benefits on Mobility Outcomes.

OBJECTIVE: To examine participants' experiences with peer-support after lower limb loss (LLL) and the associations between the peer-support experience (perceived benefits and barriers) and mobility outcomes. DESIGN: Quantitative and qualitative descriptive study with a cross-sectional design. SETTING: National survey (distributed to 169 peer-support groups in 44 states in the US). PARTICIPANTS: The survey was completed by 82 individuals with a major lower limb amputation (53% female, 54% over 55 years of age; N=82). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A 32-item survey to examine respondents' experiences in peer-support activities. Prosthetic mobility was measured using the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility (PLUS-M). RESULTS: Two out of 3 respondents received some forms of peer-support after amputation. Among them 75% reported peer-support having a positive effect on their outlook on life, and 78% reported that information gained from peer-support was helpful. Companionship, altruistic acts, and gaining information on how to cope with amputation were the top themes of why respondents enjoyed the peer-support experience. Nearly all (94%) respondents would recommend peer-support to other people with LLL. Individuals who received peer-support exhibited a trend of greater mobility (55th vs 36th percentile on PLUS-M; P=.055). CONCLUSION: Individuals with LLL reported generally positive experiences regarding their engagement in peer-support activities. Peer-support groups are viewed as a helpful source for both information and emotional support, potentially benefiting functional and psychological recovery after amputation. Individuals who have received peer-support also exhibited greater mobility.

Lower limb prosthesis users' perceptions of everyday life-A phenomenographic study.

INTRODUCTION: A lack of understanding of personal experiences related to limb amputation and prosthetic use limits the extent to which clinicians involved in rehabilitation can support and advise their clients in a person-centered consultation. The objective of this qualitative study was to explore the personal experience of daily life as a lower limb prosthesis user. METHODS: Fifteen lower limb prosthesis users participated in individual semistructured interviews. Transcripts were analyzed using a phenomenographic approach. RESULTS: The extent to which prosthesis users were able to adjust to their impairment and move on with their life was influenced by social interactions with other prosthesis users, access to relevant information about prosthetic solutions that may benefit them, and finding a balance between desired activities and their physical and/or cognitive capacity. CONCLUSIONS: After a period of existential adjustment, prosthesis users described themselves as living active, fulfilling lives. This was facilitated to a large extent by social interactions with other prosthesis users and access to information they perceived as relevant. Social media plays a particularly important role in establishing connections with other prosthesis users and is perceived as a useful source of information.

Efficacy of rehabilitation after provision of ICRC lower limb prostheses in low-income and middle-income countries: A quantitative assessment from Myanmar.

BACKGROUND: Low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs) have poorly resourced health services. Lack of access to assistive devices, such as prosthetics, may limit the functional outcomes of persons with amputation and affect quality of life (QoL). OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the functional level and QoL of prosthetic users in LMICs when prescribed a prosthesis made from International Committee for Red Cross (ICRC) components. STUDY DESIGN: The study design included a quantitative descriptive methodology assessing functional outcomes and QoL after prosthetic provision. METHODS: Participants were identified from the prosthetic service in Mandalay, Myanmar. Included participants were those with unilateral, traumatic, lower limb amputations, with ICRC devices delivered at least 6 months earlier. Participants attended the prosthetic service and were assessed using the Amputee Mobility Predictor with Prosthesis tool and the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief and Disability modules. RESULTS: Thirty-five participants completed the study; of them, 63% were persons with transtibial level amputation and 37% were with transfemoral level amputation. Approximately 83% achieved a score of more than 37 using the Amputee Mobility Predictor with Prosthesis. There is a strong positive correlation between QoL and physical health (r = 0.55; p < 0.001), social relationships (r = 0.66; p < 0.001), and inclusion (r = 0.53; p < 0.001). Participants had a better QoL and overall health when they had better psychological health. CONCLUSION: The patient-based results presented within this study could be considered as a contribution to the evidence base and importance of provision of prosthetic services in LMICs. It was observed that participants with an amputation were able to achieve a high level of physical function with the ICRC prostheses while also reporting a high QoL.

Depression and Anxiety Symptoms Among Lebanese Lower Limb Traumatic Amputees: Association with Education, Employment, Adjustment to Amputation and Prosthesis Satisfaction.

ObjectiveTo examine and compare the association between the presence of depression and anxiety symptoms and different sociodemographic and clinical factors including the adjustment to amputation and prosthesis satisfaction among Lebanese individuals with lower limb amputation (LLA). Method: This cross-sectional study was conducted between December 2022 and May 2023 among 72 participants with LLA. Participants completed a questionnaire that included sociodemographic and clinical variables, the revised Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scale (TAPES-R), and the Hopkins Symptom Checklist (HSCL-25). Result: Using the HSCL depression and anxiety cut-off, 25% of participants were categorized as having depression symptoms, with unemployment being significantly associated (p-value < .05) with depression. Similarly, 25% were classified as having anxiety symptoms, with both lower education and unemployment (p-value < .05) significantly linked to anxiety. TAPES-R subscales scores exhibited significant differences between non-depressed and depressed, as well as non-anxious and anxious participants (p-value < .05). Correlation analysis demonstrated significant relationship between HSCL scales and TAPES-R subscales; lower scores in adjustment to amputation and prosthesis satisfaction were moderately associated with increased rates of depression (r ranging between -0.331 and -0.500, p-values < .005) and increased rates of anxiety symptoms (r ranging between -0.362 and -0.441, p-values < .002). In addition, higher scores in activity limitation were moderately correlated to increased rates of depression and anxiety (r = 0.438 for anxiety and 0.490 for depression; p < .001). Conclusion: Mental health symptoms are associated with educational level, employment status, and adjustment to amputation and prosthesis satisfaction in Lebanese individuals with LLA. These findings should be considered to achieve optimal prosthetic rehabilitation.

Comparing Patient and Provider Priorities Around Amputation Level Outcomes Using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia may require a transmetatarsal amputation (TMA) or a transtibial amputation. When making an amputation-level decision, these patients face a tradeoff-a TMA preserves more limb and may provide better mobility but has a lower probability of primary wound healing and may therefore result in additional same or higher level amputation surgeries with an associated negative impact on function. Understanding differences in how patients and providers prioritize these tradeoffs and other outcomes may enhance shared decision-making. OBJECTIVES: Compare patient priorities with provider perceptions of patient priorities using Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA). METHODS: The MCDA Analytic Hierarchy Process was chosen due to its low cognitive burden and ease of implementation. We included 5 criteria (outcomes): ability to walk, healing after amputation surgery, rehabilitation program intensity, limb length, and ease of use of prosthetic/orthotic device. A national sample of dysvascular lower-limb amputees and providers were recruited from the Veterans Health Administration with the MCDA administered online to providers and telephonically to patients. RESULTS: Twenty-six dysvascular amputees and 38 providers participated. Fifty percent of patients had undergone a TMA; 50%, a transtibial amputation. When compared to providers, patients placed higher value on TMA (72% vs. 63%). Patient versus provider priorities were ability to walk (47% vs. 42%), healing (18% vs. 28%), ease of prosthesis use (17% vs. 13%), limb length (11% vs. 13%), and then rehabilitation intensity (7% vs. 6%). LIMITATIONS: Our sample may not generalize to other populations. CONCLUSIONS: Provider perceptions aligned with patient values on amputation level but varied around the importance of each outcome. IMPLICATIONS: These findings illuminate some differences between patients' values and provider perceptions of patient values, suggesting a role for shared decision-making. Embedding this MCDA framework into a future decision aid may facilitate these discussions.

Measuring residual limb health in persons with upper limb amputation: Modifications of the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire residual limb health scale.

BACKGROUND: Assessing the user perspective on residual limb health problems is particularly important for amputation care, given the relationship between residual limb health and prosthetic satisfaction. Only 1 measure, the Residual Limb Health scale of the Prosthetic Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ) has been validated for use in lower limb amputation, but not examined in persons with upper limb amputation (ULA). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of a modified PEQ Residual Limb Health scale in a sample of persons with ULA. STUDY DESIGN: The study involved a telephone survey of 392 prosthesis users with ULA, with a 40-person retest sample. METHODS: The PEQ item response scale was modified to a Likert scale. The item set and instructions were refined in cognitive and pilot testing. Descriptive analyses characterized the prevalence of residual limb issues. Factor analyses and Rasch analyses evaluated unidimensionality, monotonicity, item fit, differential item functioning, and reliability. Test-retest reliability was assessed by an intraclass correlation coefficient. RESULTS: Sweating and prosthesis odor were prevalent at 90.7% and 72.5%, respectively; blisters/sores (12.1%) and ingrown hairs (7.7%) were the least prevalent problems. Response categories were dichotomized for 3 items and trichotomized for 3 items to improve monotonicity. After adjusting for residual correlations, confirmatory factor analyses showed acceptable fit (comparative fit index = 0.984, Tucker-Lewis index = 0.970, and root mean square error approximation = 0.032). Person reliability was 0.65. No items had moderate-to-severe differential item functioning by age or sex. Intraclass correlation coefficient for test-retest reliability was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.76-0.93). CONCLUSIONS: The modified scale had excellent structural validity, fair person reliability, very good test-retest reliability, and no floor or ceiling effects. The scale is recommended for use with persons with wrist disarticulation, transradial amputation, elbow disarticulation, and above-elbow amputation.

The use of myoelectric prosthesis in a sample of veterans with unilateral upper extremity amputation: prosthesis satisfaction and quality of life.

AIMS: To determine the relationship between clinic and prosthesis-related characteristics and psychosocial adjustment, activity restriction, satisfaction with the prosthesis and quality of life in myoelectric prosthesis users with upper limb amputation. METHODS: Thirty patients with myoelectric prosthesis users with upper limb amputation took part in this study. The patients' demographic and clinical information were recorded. Psychosocial adjustment, activity restriction and satisfaction with the prosthesis were assessed with Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised (TAPES-R). Short-Form 36 (SF-36) was used for the quality of life. RESULTS: TAPES-R activity restriction score was significantly higher in patients with transhumeral or elbow disarticulation and with concomitant lower limb amputation (p = 0.009, p = 0.037, respectively). TAPES-R psychosocial adjustment subparameter score had significantly moderate correlation with daily prosthesis wearing time (p = 0.019 r = 0.425). A significant negative correlation was found between age at the time of the injury and SF-36 role limitation due to physical problem (p = 0.028 r = - 0.401). CONCLUSIONS: Clarifying the factors related to psychosocial adjustment, activity restriction, prosthesis satisfaction and quality of life in individuals with upper extremity amputation and producing interventions/approaches that support patients' life are meaningful and important steps. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTER: E2-22-1416.

Adults with unilateral lower-limb amputation: greater spatial extent of pain is associated with worse adjustment, greater activity restrictions, and less prosthesis satisfaction.

OBJECTIVES: This study's primary purpose was to determine if the extent of bodily pain, as evaluated with pain body diagrams, is associated with prosthetic-related activity restrictions, adjustment, and satisfaction among adults with a major unilateral lower-limb amputation. A secondary objective was to evaluate between-days, test-retest reliability for pain body diagrams among adults with lower-limb amputation. METHODS: Adults with a lower-limb amputation that occurred ≥1 year prior participated in an online, cross-sectional research study. Outcome measures included pain body diagrams and the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised, which evaluates post-amputation activity restrictions, psychosocial adjustment, and prosthesis satisfaction. Linear regression modeling was used to evaluate associations between the number of painful body regions and prosthetic outcomes, after considering covariates (alpha ≤ 0.010). A subset of participants recompleted pain body diagrams to evaluate between-days, test-retest reliability. RESULTS: Data from 74 participants (n = 32 female; n = 42 transtibial-level; n = 27 traumatic etiology) were available. Beyond covariates (i.e., age, sex, amputation level), the total number of painful body regions was significantly associated with all Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised subscales (p < 0.001-0.006), with the exception of Social Adjustment (p = 0.764). The total number of painful body regions explained 14.5, 11.8, 11.6, and 7.4% of the variance in Functional Satisfaction with the Prosthesis, Adjustment to Limitation, General Adjustment, and Activity Restriction, respectively. In a subset (n = 54), test-retest reliability for total number of painful body regions per body diagrams was good [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)3,1 = 0.84]. CONCLUSIONS: A greater number of painful body regions is associated with greater activity restriction, worse adjustment, and lower prosthesis satisfaction, supporting the need to enhance post-amputation pain management and both amputated- and secondary-site pain prevention. ETHICAL COMMITTEE NUMBER: IRB #1611862.

Bodily ownership of an independent supernumerary limb: an exploratory study.

Can our brain perceive a sense of ownership towards an independent supernumerary limb; one that can be moved independently of any other limb and provides its own independent movement feedback? Following the rubber-hand illusion experiment, a plethora of studies have shown that the human representation of "self" is very plastic. But previous studies have almost exclusively investigated ownership towards "substitute" artificial limbs, which are controlled by the movements of a real limb and/or limbs from which non-visual sensory feedback is provided on an existing limb. Here, to investigate whether the human brain can own an independent artificial limb, we first developed a novel independent robotic "sixth finger." We allowed participants to train using the finger and examined whether it induced changes in the body representation using behavioral as well as cognitive measures. Our results suggest that unlike a substitute artificial limb (like in the rubber hand experiment), it is more difficult for humans to perceive a sense of ownership towards an independent limb. However, ownership does seem possible, as we observed clear tendencies of changes in the body representation that correlated with the cognitive reports of the sense of ownership. Our results provide the first evidence to show that an independent supernumerary limb can be embodied by humans.

Structural validity and reliability of the patient experience measure: A new approach to assessing psychosocial experience of upper limb prosthesis users.

Recent advances in upper limb prosthetics include sensory restoration techniques and osseointegration technology that introduce additional risks, higher costs, and longer periods of rehabilitation. To inform regulatory and clinical decision making, validated patient reported outcome measures are required to understand the relative benefits of these interventions. The Patient Experience Measure (PEM) was developed to quantify psychosocial outcomes for research studies on sensory-enabled upper limb prostheses. While the PEM was responsive to changes in prosthesis experience in prior studies, its psychometric properties had not been assessed. Here, the PEM was examined for structural validity and reliability across a large sample of people with upper limb loss (n = 677). The PEM was modified and tested in three phases: initial refinement and cognitive testing, pilot testing, and field testing. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was used to discover the underlying factor structure of the PEM items and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) verified the structure. Rasch partial credit modeling evaluated monotonicity, fit, and magnitude of differential item functioning by age, sex, and prosthesis use for all scales. EFA resulted in a seven-factor solution that was reduced to the following six scales after CFA: social interaction, self-efficacy, embodiment, intuitiveness, wellbeing, and self-consciousness. After removal of two items during Rasch analyses, the overall model fit was acceptable (CFI = 0.973, TLI = 0.979, RMSEA = 0.038). The social interaction, self-efficacy and embodiment scales had strong person reliability (0.81, 0.80 and 0.77), Cronbach's alpha (0.90, 0.80 and 0.71), and intraclass correlation coefficients (0.82, 0.85 and 0.74), respectively. The large sample size and use of contemporary measurement methods enabled identification of unidimensional constructs, differential item functioning by participant characteristics, and the rank ordering of the difficulty of each item in the scales. The PEM enables quantification of critical psychosocial impacts of advanced prosthetic technologies and provides a rigorous foundation for future studies of clinical and prosthetic interventions.

Quality of life, body image and self-esteem in patients with unilateral transtibial amputations.

Amputation represents a drastic impact on the patient's body and perception. This cross-sectional study aims to analyse the aesthetic concern represented by body image, self-esteem and quality of life in patients with unilateral transtibial amputations of lower limbs compared to control group. People living with amputations present lower average levels than controls in all subscales of the SF-36 (Short Form 36 Health Survey) quality of life questionnaire, and in both the physical component summary and the mental component summary, although the difference is not statistically significant in the latter. These patients present a significantly lower mean score (p = 0.002) in the MBSRQ (Body-Self Relations Questionnaire) body image questionnaire: 2.64 ± 0.49 opposed to 3.16 ± 0.55 in controls. People living with amputations had a lower mean score on the Rosenberg Self-Esteem scale than controls (34.44 ± 4.61 v 36.04 ± 3.63). The results also show that amputation has a significant influence on the BI (Body image) of patients with unilateral transtibial amputations. SE (Self-Esteem) seems to be an aspect that is not significantly affected by lower limb amputation, although these patients scored a lower mean on the RSE scale compared to the control group. We consider it is highly relevant to assess QoL (Quality of life), BI and SE in patients after a lower limb amputation process.

The client satisfaction with device: a Rasch validation of the Arabic version in patients with upper and lower limb amputation.

BACKGROUND: The Client Satisfaction with Devices (CSD) module of the Orthotics and Prosthetics Users' Survey is an extensively used questionnaire that measures patients' satisfaction with orthosis and prosthesis. However, the validated version for Arabic speakers (CSD-Ar) is only applicable for orthosis users. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the psychometric proprieties of the CSD-Ar for prosthetics users. METHODS: The study used a convenience sample of prosthesis users from Saudi Arabia and Turkey (N = 183), who completed the CSD-Ar. The collected data were analysed using Rasch analysis to evaluate item fit, reliability indices, item difficulty, local item dependency, and differential item functioning (DIF) using WINSTEPS version 4.6.1. RESULTS: Based on the analysis, the four-response Likert-scale was acceptable, as shown by the category functioning test, All eight items did achieve a fit to the Rasch Model [(infit) and (outfit) mean-square 0.75 to 1.3]. Person separation reliability was 0.76, and item separation reliability was 0.94. A principal component analysis (PCA) showed satisfactory unidimensionality and no local item dependency. The DIF analysis showed no notable dependency among items on participant characteristics in terms of age, gender, duration of use, country, and level of amputation. CONCLUSION: This study contributes to the confidence of using CSD-Ar to evaluate users' satisfaction with different prostheses, affirming the need for further refinement of the quality of the outcome measure.

Absence of reliable physiological signature of illusory body ownership revealed by fine-grained autonomic measurement during the rubber hand illusion.

The neural representation of a 'biological self' is linked theoretically to the control of bodily physiology. In an influential model, selfhood relates to internal agency and higher-order interoceptive representation, inferred from the predicted impact of efferent autonomic nervous activity on afferent viscerosensory feedback. Here we tested if an altered representation of physical self (illusory embodiment of an artificial hand) is accompanied by sustained shifts in autonomic activity. Participants (N = 37) underwent procedures for induction of the rubber hand illusion (synchronous stroking of own unseen hand and observed stroking of artificial hand) and a control condition (asychronous stroking). We recorded electrocardiography, electrodermal activity, and a non-invasive measure of multiunit skin sympathetic nerve activity (SKNA) from the chest. We compared these autonomic indices between task conditions, and between individuals who did and did not experience the illusion. Bayes factors quantified the strength of evidence for and against null hypotheses. Observed proprioceptive drift and subjective reports confirmed the efficacy of the synchronous (vs asynchronous) condition in inducing illusory hand ownership. Stringent discriminant analysis classified 24/37 individuals as experiencing the rubber hand illusion. Surprisingly, heart rate, heart rate variability, electrodermal activity, and SKNA measures revealed no autonomic differences between synchronous vs asynchronous conditions, nor between individuals who did or did not experience the rubber hand illusion. Bayes factors indicated substantial evidence for no physiological differences. In contrast to earlier reports, our autonomic data show the absence of a reliable change in physiological state during the rubber hand illusion. More encompassing perturbations of self-experience, for example in full body illusions, may nevertheless be coupled to, or facilitated by, changes in efferent autonomic activity and afferent viscerosensory feedback. Our findings suggest that such changes in bodily physiology are not sustained as an obligatory component of the rubber hand illusion.

Perceptual correlates of successful body-prosthesis interaction in lower limb amputees: psychometric characterisation and development of the Prosthesis Embodiment Scale.

Prostheses are used to at least partly restore the body after limb amputation. Making the user accepting the prosthetic device as part of his or her body, i.e., inducing prosthesis embodiment, has been identified as major aim of prosthetic treatment. However, up to now, there is no consensus about the psychometric nature of prosthesis embodiment in limb amputees. In the present study, 118 unilateral lower limb amputees using a prosthesis were asked to complete an online questionnaire targeting prosthesis embodiment. Principal axis factoring revealed the factor structure of prosthesis embodiment, i.e., Ownership/Integrity, Agency, and Anatomical Plausibility, which resembles the embodiment structure previously identified for normally-limbed participants. The majority of amputees achieved prosthesis embodiment as assessed with the final version of the newly developed Prosthesis Embodiment Scale. Internal consistency was excellent, and test-retest reliability was satisfying, while the instrument was also sensitive for new prosthetic equipment. Validation on the basis of relationships to prosthesis satisfaction and adjustment to prosthesis use was performed. The Prosthesis Embodiment Scale could be a valuable tool for the assessment of perceptual correlates of successful body-prosthesis interaction in rehabilitative and research contexts, the latter which might further benefit from the comparability of psychometrically evaluated data.

Perturbation recovery during walking is impacted by knowledge of perturbation timing in below-knee prosthesis users and non-impaired participants.

Previous research found that below-knee prosthesis users proactively increase their lateral margin-of-stability on their impaired side in anticipation of an impending perturbation when the timing is predictable and potentially directed toward the impaired limb. While knowledge of perturbation timing and direction influences proactive strategies, the consequences of such knowledge and anticipatory behavior on recovery from perturbations is unclear. This study characterized center-of-mass (CoM) dynamics of below-knee prosthesis users and non-impaired controls following a lateral perturbation when the perturbation direction is known but a priori knowledge of the timing of perturbation is either known or unknown. Across groups, CoM displacement during perturbation exposure increased when directed towards the impaired or non-dominant limb with no influence of timing knowledge. In addition, peak CoM displacement was less with known timing irrespective of the perturbation direction. Generally, the CoM displacement during perturbation exposure correlated well with the CoM medial-lateral velocity during unperturbed walking, supporting evidence that human response dynamics to lateral perturbations are influenced by the instantaneous state of the body's momentum.

User-relevant factors determining prosthesis choice in persons with major unilateral upper limb defects: A meta-synthesis of qualitative literature and focus group results.

OBJECTIVE: Considering the high rejection rates of upper limb prostheses, it is important to determine which prosthesis fits best the needs of each user. The introduction of the multi-grip prostheses hands (MHP), which have functional advantages but are also more expensive, has made prosthesis selection even harder. Therefore, we aimed to identify user opinions on factors determining prosthesis choice of persons with major unilateral upper limb defects in order to facilitate a more optimal fit between user and prosthesis. METHODS: A qualitative meta-synthesis using a 'best-fit framework' approach was performed by searching five databases (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019126973). Studies were considered eligible if they contained qualitative content about adults with major unilateral upper limb defects experienced in using commercially available upper limb prostheses and focused on upper limb prosthesis users' opinions. Results of the meta-synthesis were validated with end-users (n = 11) in a focus group. RESULTS: Out of 6247 articles, 19 studies were included. An overview of six main themes ('physical', 'activities and participation', 'mental', 'social', 'rehabilitation, cost and prosthetist services' and 'prosthesis related factors') containing 86 subthemes that could affect prosthesis choice was created. Of these subthemes, 19 were added by the focus group. Important subthemes were 'work/school', 'functionality' and 'reactions from public'. Opinions of MHP-users were scarce. MHPs were experienced as more dexterous and life-like but also as less robust and difficult to control. CONCLUSION: The huge number of factors that could determine upper limb prosthesis choice explains that preferences vary greatly. The created overview can be of great value to identify preferences and facilitate user-involvement in the selection process. Ultimately, this may contribute to a more successful match between user and prosthesis, resulting in a decrease of abandonment and increase of cost-effectiveness.

Syme Amputation: Function, Satisfaction, and Prostheses.

BACKGROUND: Syme amputation (SA) is a term used to describe an amputation at the level of the ankle joint in which the heel pad is preserved. It is performed for a number of indications in a pediatric population. SA is purported to hold the advantage of allowing weight bearing without a prosthesis. A limb length discrepancy (LLD) is useful for ambulation without a prosthesis but can be restrictive with regards to the fitting of modern prostheses. METHODS: A voluntary survey was distributed to persons living with SA. Recruitment occurred through hospital electronic database and electronic advertising. Data collected included baseline demographic information, data pertaining to weight bearing in different environments, as well as 2 validated outcome measures: the Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales-Revised (TAPES-R activity restriction scale) and the Locomotor Capabilities Index-5 (LCI-5). An illustration was designed to allow participants to classify their LLD by zone in relation to their nonamputated limb. RESULTS: At total of 47 persons living with SA participated. The average age at amputation was 3.7 years (range, 0.5 to 14.1 y), and at survey completion 15.8 years (1.7 to 60.3). Five of the described "zones" of LLD were represented. Average LCI-5 score was 52.6. Mean TAPES-R activity restriction scale was 0.59, the lowest mean being achieved by zone E participants, indicating the least restriction. Ability to walk without a prosthesis was lower in those participants over 11 years, when compared with those under, as well as being dependent on the walking environment. CONCLUSIONS: Our study found no trend indicating that a very low LLD was functionally optimal, and indeed found participants with a moderate LLD (zone E) to have the least mean restriction with regard to their prosthesis. Our study demonstrates that ambulation without a prosthesis depends on the environment (ie, flooring), and rates decrease significantly into adulthood. Optimal care should not focus simply "preserving length," but rather functional optimization and length modulation in parallel with a nuanced understanding of actual daily activities and prosthetic options. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Adjustment and Satisfaction with Prosthesis Among People after Upper Limb Amputation in Slovenia.

BACKGROUND: There is a lack of studies on adjustment to upper limb prosthesis with large representative samples that would compare different prosthesis types and use standardised outcome measures. Hence, we wanted to assess satisfaction with, and level of adjustment to, an upper-limb prosthesis among people after an upper limb amputation in our country. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional descriptive study. The TAPES-R questionnaire was mailed to 431 patients identified from electronic health records at national specialist outpatient clinics for rehabilitation of people after upper limb amputation. RESULTS: 191 patients (44%) responded and were subsequently ascertained to be a representative sample of the population of upper limb amputees in our country. Univariate analyses and multiple regression models indicated that, on average, overall satisfaction is lower among those who have received their current prosthesis more recently, women might be more satisfied with prosthesis than men, above-elbow amputees experience more activity restrictions than those with amputation at a lower level, patients with amputated fingers or palm are more satisfied with the prosthesis than others, and so are those who had amputation following an accident as compared to other reasons. CONCLUSION: We reliably identified some systematic factors, but it is individual factors and experience that largely determine adjustment to and satisfaction with a prosthesis following an upper limb amputation.

Qualitative analysis of resilience characteristics of people with unilateral transtibial amputation.

BACKGROUND: Resilience characteristics are a significant factor in the highly variable rehabilitation outcomes for people in middle age or later with transtibial amputation. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to describe resilience characteristics meaningful to people with transtibial amputation in middle age or later, who use a prosthesis. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted, audio recorded, and transcribed with eighteen participants. Interview transcripts were coded and analyzed using a directed content analysis approach, guided by Charney's theory of resilience and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale scores. RESULTS: Five main resilience characteristics (themes) were identified: coping skills, cognitive flexibility, optimism, skill for facing fear, and social support. Participants with higher resilience scores generally described effective use of coping skills, cognitive flexibility, optimism, skills in facing fears, and social support to attain meaningful goals. In contrast, participants with lower resilience scores discussed passive coping strategies, cognitive rigidity, general pessimism, avoidance of activities due to fear, or social support limitations. CONCLUSION: Coping skills, cognitive flexibility, optimism, skills for facing fear, and social support were identified as meaningful resilience characteristics for people with transtibial amputation in middle age or later. These characteristics can be targeted and enhanced using resilience interventions. Future research should consider these characteristics when designing and testing rehabilitation focused resilience interventions for people with TTA.