[Sustainability in Outpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Patients with Asbestosis - Results of an 8-Year Follow Up]. / Nachhaltigkeit in der ambulanten pneumologischen Rehabilitation bei Patienten mit Asbestose.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an outpatient medical rehabilitation (OMR) mainly composed of exercise therapy and sports for patients with asbestosis and focused on keeping up sustainability effects. METHODS: 157 male patients aged 65.2 ±â€Š5.7 years suffering from asbestosis carried out over a period of three weeks 5 times weekly 6 h at a time phase 1 of the OMR consisting of evidence-based contents of the pulmonary rehabilitation. In the immediately following phase 2, the patients completed once a week for 3 hours over 12 weeks further therapeutic applications with the main focus on exercise therapy and sports and were subsequently transferred to health sports groups near to residence (phase 3). The effects of the OMR were evaluated at the beginning (T1), at the end of phase 1 (T2) and phase 2 (T3) as well as 6 (T4) and 20 months (T5) after T3. 61 patients (73.5 years ±â€Š5.6) were re-examined 6 years after T5 (T6) without any interim care. RESULTS: 72.1 % of the 61 patients (n = 44) carried out health sports twice a week in T5 as well as in T6 eight years after T1 and were able to maintain their physical performance (6-minute walk test, hand force, PWC test) as well as the perceived quality of life (SF-36, baseline/transition dyspnea index) according to age, while the rehab effects of the 17 patients breaking off any sporting activities after T3 fell significantly (p < .01) below the starting condition in T1. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of a restrictive pulmonary disease specific exercise therapy and sports are able to mobilize physical reserves of performance and induce an increasing quality of life as well as a higher resilience in activities of daily living. These positive effects could be stabilized in the long term by a regular training. The results underline the necessity of integrating aftercare strategies into the concept of rehabilitation with special consideration of perceived self-efficacy.

The evidence of benefits of exercise training in interstitial lung disease: a randomised controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Uncertainty exists regarding the clinical relevance of exercise training across the range of interstitial lung diseases (ILDs). OBJECTIVE: To establish the impact of exercise training in patients with ILDs of differing aetiology and severity. METHODS: 142 participants with ILD (61 idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), 22 asbestosis, 23 connective tissue disease-related ILD (CTD-ILD) and 36 with other aetiologies) were randomised to either 8 weeks of supervised exercise training or usual care. Six-minute walk distance (6MWD), Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRDQ), St George Respiratory Questionnaire IPF-specific version (SGRQ-I) and modified Medical Research Council dyspnoea score were measured at baseline, 9 weeks and 6 months. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Exercise training significantly increased 6MWD (25 m, 95% CI 2 to 47 m) and health-related quality of life (CRDQ and SGRQ-I) in people with ILD. Larger improvements in 6MWD, CRDQ, SGRQ-I and dyspnoea occurred in asbestosis and IPF compared with CTD-ILD, but with few significant differences between subgroups. Benefits declined at 6 months except in CTD-ILD. Lower baseline 6MWD and worse baseline symptoms were associated with greater benefit in 6MWD and symptoms following training. Greater gains were seen in those whose exercise prescription was successfully progressed according to the protocol. At 6 months, sustained improvements in 6MWD and symptoms were associated with better baseline lung function and less pulmonary hypertension. CONCLUSIONS: Exercise training is effective in patients across the range of ILDs, with clinically meaningful benefits in asbestosis and IPF. Successful exercise progression maximises improvements and sustained treatment effects favour those with milder disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Results, ACTRN12611000416998.

Exercise training to improve exercise capacity and quality of life in people with non-malignant dust-related respiratory diseases.

BACKGROUND: Non-malignant dust-related respiratory diseases, such as asbestosis and silicosis, are similar to other chronic respiratory diseases and may be characterised by breathlessness, reduced exercise capacity and reduced health-related quality of life. Some non-malignant dust-related respiratory diseases are a global health issue and very few treatment options, including pharmacological, are available. Therefore, examining the role of exercise training is particularly important to determine whether exercise training is an effective treatment option in non-malignant dust-related respiratory diseases. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of exercise training for people with non-malignant dust-related respiratory diseases compared with control, placebo or another non-exercise intervention on exercise capacity, health-related quality of life and levels of physical activity. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, PEDro and AMED (all searched from inception until February 2015), national and international clinical trial registries, reference lists of relevant papers and we contacted experts in the field for identification of suitable studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included only randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared exercise training of at least four weeks duration with no exercise training, placebo or another non-exercise intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. Two review authors independently assessed study eligibility and risk of bias, and extracted data. We employed the GRADE approach to assess the overall quality of evidence for each outcome and to interpret findings. We synthesized study results using a random-effects model based on the assessment of heterogeneity. We conducted subgroup analyses on participants with dust-related interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) and participants with asbestos related pleural disease (ARPD). MAIN RESULTS: Two RCTs including a combined total of 40 participants (35 from one study and five from a second study) met the inclusion criteria. Twenty-one participants were randomised to the exercise training group and 19 participants were randomised to the control group. The included studies evaluated the effects of exercise training compared to a control group of no exercise training in people with dust-related ILDs and ARPD. The exercise training programme in both studies was in an outpatient setting for an eight-week period. The risk of bias was low in both studies. There were no reported adverse events of exercise training. Following exercise training, six-minute walk distance (6MWD) increased with a mean difference (MD) of 53.81 metres (m) (95% CI 34.36 to 73.26 m). Improvements were also seen in the domains of health-related quality of life: Chronic Respiratory Disease Questionnaire (CRQ) Dyspnoea domain (MD 2.58, 95% CI 0.72 to 4.44); CRQ Fatigue domain (MD 1.00, 95% CI 0.11 to 1.89); CRQ Emotional Function domain (MD 2.61, 95% CI 0.74 to 4.49); and CRQ Mastery domain (MD 1.51, 95% CI 0.29 to 2.72). Improvements in exercise capacity and health-related quality of life were also evident six months following the intervention period: 6MWD (MD 52.68 m, 95% CI 27.43 to 77.93 m); CRQ Dyspnoea domain (MD 3.03, 95% CI 1.41 to 4.66); CRQ Emotional Function domain (MD 5.57, 95% CI 2.34 to 8.81); and CRQ Mastery domain (MD 2.66, 95% CI 1.08 to 4.23). Exercise training did not result in improvements in the Modified Medical Research Council (MMRC) dyspnoea scale immediately following exercise training or six months following exercise training. The improvements following exercise training were similar in a subgroup of participants with dust-related ILDs and in a subgroup of participants with ARPD compared to the control group, with no statistically significant differences in treatment effects between the subgroups. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The evidence examining exercise training in people with non-malignant dust-related respiratory diseases is of very low quality. This is due to imprecision in the results from the small number of trials and the small number of participants, the indirectness of evidence due to a paucity of information on disease severity and the data from one study being from a subgroup of participants, and inconsistency from high heterogeneity in some results. Therefore, although the review findings indicate that an exercise training programme is effective in improving exercise capacity and health-related quality of life in the short-term and at six months follow-up, we remain unsure of these findings due to the very low quality evidence. Larger, high quality trials are needed to determine the strength of these findings.

Long-term efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with occupational respiratory diseases.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary rehabilitation is a well-recognized treatment option in chronic obstructive lung disease improving exercise performance, respiratory symptoms and quality of life. In occupational respiratory diseases, which can be rather cost-intensive due to the compensation needs, very little information is available. OBJECTIVES: This study aims at the evaluation of the usefulness of pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with occupational respiratory diseases, partly involving complex alterations of lung function and of the sustainability of effects. METHODS: We studied 263 patients with occupational respiratory diseases (asthma, silicosis, asbestosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease) using a 4-week inpatient rehabilitation program and follow-up examinations 3 and 12 months later. The outcomes evaluated were lung function, 6-min walking distance (6MWD), maximum exercise capacity (Wmax), skeletal muscle strength, respiratory symptoms, exacerbations and associated medical consultations, quality of life (SF-36, SGRQ), anxiety/depression (HADS) and Medical Research Council and Baseline and Transition Dyspnea Index scores. RESULTS: Compared to baseline, there were significant (p < 0.05) improvements in 6MWD, Wmax and muscle strength immediately after rehabilitation, and these were maintained over 12 months (p < 0.05). Effects were less pronounced in asbestosis. Overall, a significant reduction in the rate of exacerbations by 35%, antibiotic therapy by 27% and use of health care services by 17% occurred within 12 months after rehabilitation. No changes were seen in the questionnaire outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary rehabilitation is effective even in the complex settings of occupational respiratory diseases, providing sustained improvement of functional capacity and reducing health care utilization.

[Improvement of lasting effects in outpatient pulmonary rehabilitation with special regard to exercise therapy and sports]. / Verbesserung von Nachhaltigkeitseffekten in der ambulanten pneumologischen Rehabilitation unter besonderer Berücksichtigung der Sporttherapie.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of outpatient medical rehabilitation (OMR) mainly composed of exercise therapy and sports for patients with asbestosis. Following the Hamburg model, the OMR focuses on keeping up lasting effects. METHOD: In the frame of a pre-experimental study, 113 male asbestosis patients aged 66.1+/-5.8 years participated 6 hrs. a day five times a week over a period of three weeks in phase 1 of the OMR consisting of evidence-based contents of the pulmonary rehabilitation. Directly after that further therapeutic applications with the main focus on exercise therapy and sports were applied for 3 hrs. once a week over a period of twelve weeks (phase 2). After phase 2 the rehabilitation centre led the patients into sports groups near their places of residence (phase 3). The effects of the OMR were evaluated at the beginning (T1), at the end of phase 1 (T2) and phase 2 (T3) as well as 6 (T4) and 18 months (T5) after T3 by means of a suitable assessment. RESULTS: Compared to T1 physical fitness (6-minute Walk Test, Hand-Force Test) as well as health-related quality of life (SF-36), dyspnea (BDI/TDI) and oxygen partial pressure (pO2) were significantly improved in T2. These positive effects could be confirmed in T3. 89 patients (79%) were doing health-related sports regularly 6 and 18 months after T3 and could preserve their health outcome in T4 and T5, while the effects of rehabilitation of the 24 patients breaking off any sporting activities wore off again down to and even below the starting condition at T1. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of a restrictive pulmonary disease, specific exercise therapy and sports are able to mobilize physical reserves of performance and induce an increasing quality of life as well as a higher resilience in activities of daily living. These positive effects could be stabilized persistently by a regular training once a week. Thus, the results emphasize the necessity to include strategies of aftercare in the concept of rehabilitation.

[Short- and long-term effects of the outpatient medical rehabilitation for patients with asbestosis]. / Kurz- und langfristige Effekte der Ambulanten Medizinischen Rehabilitation für Patienten mit Asbestose.

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of an outpatient medical rehabilitation (OMR) mainly composed of exercise therapy and sports for patients with asbestosis. Following the model of Hamburg the OMR focuses on keeping up lasting effects. METHODS: In the frame of a pre-experimental study 104 male patients aged 65.7 +/- 5.5 years suffering asbestosis carried out over a period of three weeks 5 times weekly 6 h at a time phase 1 of the OMR consisting of evidence-based contents of the pulmonary rehabilitation. Directly after that further therapeutic applications with the main focus on exercise therapy and sports were applied over a period of 12 weeks one time weekly 3 h at a time (phase 2). After phase 2 the rehabilitation centre led the patients into sports groups near at place of residence (phase 3). The effects of the OMR were evaluated at the beginning (T1), at the end of phase 1 (T2) and phase 2 (T3) as well as 6 (T4) and 18 months (T5) after T3 by means of a suitable assessment. RESULTS: Compared to T1 physical fitness (6-minute Walk Test, Hand-Force Test, PWC Test) as well as health-related quality of life (SF-36) of the patients were significantly improved in T2. Whereas the parameter "vital capacity" and "forced expiratory volume" showed no change over the period of investigation data of "oxygen partial pressure" was significantly increased, too. These positive effects could be confirmed in T3. 82 patients (79%) were doing sports due to health regularly still 6 and 18 months after T3 and could preserve their health outcome in T4 and T5, while the effects of rehabilitation of the 22 patients breaking off any sporting activities wore off again to and even below starting condition in T1. CONCLUSIONS: In spite of a restrictive pulmonary disease specific exercise therapy and sports are able to mobilize physical reserves of performance and induce an increasing quality of life as well as a higher resilience in activities of daily living. These positive effects could be stabilized persistently by a regular training one time weekly. That way the results emphasize the necessity to put strategies of aftercare into the concept of rehabilitation.

[Symptoms of asbestos-related diseases and correction of hemodynamic and ventilation changes in asbestosis patients].

The authors present results of thorough examination of asbestosis and dust bronchitis patients, features of dust load and X-ray functional changes, efficiency of physical therapy complexes in correcting cardio-pulmonary syndrome.

[Long term effects of pulmonary rehabilitation in COPD and interstitial lung disease--synopsis of databases since 1990]. / Langzeiteffekte der pneumologischen Rehabilitation bei COPD und interstitiellen Lungenerkrankungen--Synopse der Datenlage seit 1990.

The efficacy of pulmonary rehabilitation with a multi-disciplinary approach has been demonstrated especially in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This review focuses particularly on the long-term outcome of pulmonary rehabilitation. Significant improvements have been demonstrated with respect to quality of life and exercise capacity up to one year after rehabilitation. Further investigations are still required on other outcome measures such as effects on repeated hospitalization, different types of rehabilitation (in-patient, out-patient, combined), and on rehabilitation of patients with non-obstructive pulmonary diseases.

Lung function and respiratory symptoms related to changes in smoking habits in asbestos-exposed subjects.

The purpose of this study was to examine respiratory symptoms and lung function (forced vital capacity [FVC] and forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV1]) as related to changes in smoking habits in subjects previously exposed to asbestos. The study was linked to a smoke-ending program among asbestos-exposed males. Subjects were recruited from a population-based survey, and 231 smokers met for the baseline consultation. The baseline prevalences of cough, chronic cough, and dyspnea among smokers were 68.0%, 44.6%, and 42.4%, respectively. Both smoke-ending (n = 10) and tobacco reduction (n = 52) during the 2-year follow-up resulted in remission of cough and chronic cough, whereas dyspnea was unaffected. When the 2-year measurements of FVC and FEV1 were adjusted for the respective baseline measurements, FEV1 tended to improve in subjects who had quit during the study, relative to the continuing smokers. It was concluded that both smoke-ending and reduction of tobacco consumption resulted in reduction of cough and chronic cough, but not of dyspnea. The study further suggests a possible positive effect of smoking cessation on FEV1, but not merely by reduction of tobacco consumption.

[Rehabilitation of the worker with bronchopneumopathy]. / La riabilitazione del lavoratore broncopneumopatico.

Epidemiological data show that chronic diseases of the respiratory apparatus have constantly increased over the last 20 years or so, often involving relatively young age classes. The increased survival rates due to chemotherapy also increase the importance of rehabilitation in such diseases. The officially accepted concept of a "global" rehabilitation is particularly significant in the case of patients of working age. The main rehabilitation procedures include chest physiotherapy, aerosol therapy, oxygen therapy (where selection criteria have been established and where there are new prospects related to long-term oxygen therapy), intermittent positive pressure breathing and physical retraining. Details on the methods of assessment and training and data concerning three groups of patients suffering from respectively chronic obstructive lung disease, silicosis and asbestosis, are given. The data show a general pattern of a decrease in ventilation (for an unchanged level of O2 uptake and CO2 output) and reflect a rise in muscular efficiency (exercising and respiratory) enabling the body to perform the same work load at a lower energy cost. The authors discuss the vocational rehabilitation of the patient with lung disease and illustrate the most useful procedures in the assessment of the subject, the environment and the place of work, including guidelines to achieve this. Rehabilitation treatment is also summarized into a number of stages, with the goals at different therapeutic levels and the ways to reach them.