Effects of Antithymocyte Globulin, Basiliximab, and Induction-Free Treatment in Living Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients on Tacrolimus-Based Immunosuppression.

OBJECTIVES: Induction treatment in renal transplant is associated with better graft survival. However, intensified immunosuppression is known to cause unwanted side effects such as infection and malignancy. Furthermore, the effects of the routine use of immunosuppressants in low-risk kidney transplant recipients are still not clear. In this study, we assessed the first-year safety and efficacy of induction treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined first living donor kidney transplant patients who were on tacrolimus based immunosuppression therapy. We formed 3 groups according to the induction status: antithymocyte globulin induction, basiliximab induction, and no induction. We collected outcome data on delayed graft function, graft loss, creatinine levels, estimated glomerular filtration rates, acute rejection episodes, hospitalization episodes, and infection episodes, including cytomegalovirus infection and bacterial infections. RESULTS: We examined a total of 126 patients (age 35 ± 12 years; 65% male). Of them, 25 received antithymocyte globulin, 52 received basiliximab, and 49 did notreceive any induction treatment. We did not observe any statistically significant difference among the 3 groups in terms of acute rejection episodes, delayed graft function, and first-year graft loss. The estimated glomerular filtration rates were similar among the groups. Overall bacterial infectious complications and cytomegalovirus infection showed similar prevalence among all groups. Hospitalization was less common in the induction-free group. CONCLUSIONS: In low-risk patients, induction-free regimens could be associated with a better safety profile without compromising graft survival. Therefore, induction treatment may be disregarded in first living donor transplant patients who receive tacrolimusbased triple immunosuppression treatment.

Alemtuzumab induction is associated with decreased hospitalization rates in pediatric kidney transplant: A UNOS data review for safety and outcomes with common induction regimens.

BACKGROUND: We hypothesized that alemtuzumab use is safe in pediatric kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with equivalent long-term outcomes compared to other induction agents. METHODS: Using pediatric kidney transplant recipient data in the UNOS database between January 1, 2000, and June 30, 2022, multivariate logistic regression, multivariable Cox regression, and survival analyses were utilized to estimate the likelihoods of 1st-year and all-time hospitalizations, acute rejection, CMV infection, delayed graft function (DGF), graft loss, and patient mortality among recipients of three common induction regimens (ATG, alemtuzumab, and basiliximab). RESULTS: There were no differences in acute rejection or graft failure among induction or maintenance regimens. Basiliximab was associated with lower odds of DGF in deceased donor recipients (OR 0.77 [0.60-0.99], p = .04). Mortality was increased in patients treated with steroid-containing maintenance (HR 1.3 [1.005-1.7] p = .045). Alemtuzumab induction correlated with less risk of CMV infection than ATG (OR 0.76 [0.59-0.99], p = .039). Steroid-containing maintenance conferred lower rate of PTLD compared to steroid-free maintenance (HR 0.59 [0.4-0.8] p = .001). Alemtuzumab was associated with less risk of hospitalization within 1 year (OR 0.79 [0.67-0.95] p = .012) and 5 years (HR 0.54 [0.46-0.65] p < .001) of transplantation. Steroid maintenance also decreased 5 years hospitalization risk (HR 0.78 [0.69-0.89] p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Pediatric KTRs may be safely treated with alemtuzumab induction without increased risk of acute rejection, DGF, graft loss, or patient mortality. The decreased risk of CMV infections and lower hospitalization rates compared to other agents make alemtuzumab an attractive choice for induction in pediatric KTRs, especially in those who cannot tolerate ATG.

A heart transplant center experience with basiliximab induction strategies: A double edged sword?

BACKGROUND: The use of induction immunosuppression for heart transplantation (HT) is debated given the uncertain benefit and potential risks of infection and malignancy. METHODS: This is a retrospective single-center analysis of 475 consecutive HT recipients from 2003 to 2020 grouped by use of induction with basiliximab group (BG) and the no basiliximab group (NBG). Subgroup analysis by era compared pre-2016 standard-basiliximab (BX) induction and 2016-2020 with selective-BX use as part of a calcineurin-inhibitor-sparing regimen. RESULTS: When adjusted for confounders (sex, age, PRA, eGFR), the BG was less likely to have acute cellular rejection (ACR) (OR.42, p < .001), but had more antibody mediated rejection (AMR) (OR 11.7, p < .001) and more cardiac allograft vasculopathy (CAV) (OR 3.8, p = .04). There was no difference between BG and NBG in the incidence of malignancies or infections. When stratified by era (pre-2016 vs. 2016-2020), ACR remained less common in the BG than the NBG (36% vs. 50%, p = .045) groups, while AMR remained more common (9.7 vs. 0% p = .005). There was no significant difference in conditional survival comparing pre-and post-2016 NBG (HR 2.20 (95% CI.75-6.43); however, both pre-2016 BG and post-2016 BG have significantly higher mortality (HR 2.37 [95% CI 1.02-5.50) and HR 2.69 (95% CI 1.08-6.71), p = .045 and.03, respectively]. CONCLUSION: Basiliximab reduces the incidence of ACR but increases the risk of AMR, CAV, and may be associated with increased mortality. Mechanistic studies are needed to describe a potential T-cell-escape mechanism with enhanced humoral immunity.

[Short-term substitution of calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) with recombinant humanized anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (Basiliximab) as aGVHD prophylaxis in CNI intolerant patients after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation].

Objectives: To investigate the efficacy of short-term substitution of recombinant humanized anti-CD25 monoclonal antibody (Basiliximab) as acute GVHD (aGVHD) prophylaxis in calcineurin inhibitors (CNI) intolerant patients following allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) . Methods: This study included 17 patients with refractory malignant hematological disorders who underwent salvage allo-HSCT at the Bone Marrow Transplantation Department of Shanghai Zhaxin Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital from August 2021 to August 2022 and were treated with Baliximab to prevent aGVHD due to severe adverse reactions to CNI. There were seven men and ten women, with a median age of 43 years (18-67). Following the discontinuation of CNI, Basiliximab was administered at a dose of 1 mg/kg once weekly until CNI or mTOR inhibitors were resumed. Results: Basiliximab was started at an average of 5 (1-32) days after HSCT. The median duration of substitution was 20 (7-120) days. All had neutrophil engraftment within a median of 12 (10-17) days. Thirteen patients had platelet engraftment after a median of 13 (11-20) days. Four patients did not develop stable platelet engraftment. Eight patients (47.1% ) developed Grade Ⅱ-Ⅳ aGVHD, while four (23.6% ) developed Grade Ⅲ/Ⅳ aGVHD. Only one patient died from aGVHD. Before the end of the followup period, seven of 17 patients died. The longest followup period of the survivors was 347 days, and the median survival rate was not met. The overall survival (OS) rate at six months was 62.6%. Among the 17 patients, 13 (76.4% ) experienced cytomegalovirus reactivation, 7 (41.2% ) experienced EB virus activation, and no cytomegalovirus disease was observed. Conclusions: When CNI intolerance occurs during allo-HSCT, short-term replacement with Baliximab can be used as an alternative to prevent aGVHD.

Efficacy and safety of single-dose anti-thymocyte globulin versus basiliximab induction therapy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of basiliximab (BAS) versus a single dose of anti-thymocyte globulin (r-ATG) induction therapy in pediatric kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). METHODS: This single-center retrospective comparative cohort study included all pediatric KTRs from May 2013 to April 2018 and followed up to 12 months. In the first period, all recipients received BAS, while from May 2016, a single 3 mg/kg dose of r-ATG was instituted. Maintenance therapy consisted of a calcineurin inhibitor plus prednisone plus azathioprine or mycophenolate. RESULTS: A total of 227 patients were included (BAS, n = 113; r-ATG, n = 114). The main combination of immunosuppressive drugs was tacrolimus, prednisone, and azathioprine in both groups (87% vs. 88%, p = .718). Patients receiving r-ATG showed superior survival-free of the composite endpoint (acute rejection, graft loss, or death; 76% vs. 61%, p = .003; HR 2.08, 1.29-3.34, p = .003) and lower incidence of biopsy-proven acute rejection (10% vs. 21%, p = .015). There was no difference in the overall incidence of CMV infection (33% vs. 37%, p = .457), PTLD (1% vs. 3%, p = .309), 30-day hospital readmissions (24% vs. 23%, p = .847), and kidney function at 12 months (86 ± 29 vs. 84 ± 30 mL/min/1.73m2, p = .614). CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that induction therapy with a single 3 mg/kg dose of r-ATG is associated with higher efficacy for preventing acute rejection and similar safety profile compared to BAS.

The Effect of Induction Therapy on Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation: A Network Meta-Analysis Using Recent Data.

BACKGROUND: Various induction regimens are available for kidney transplantation (KT); however, which is superior remains unclear. Moreover, although the induction regimens are effective and important for reducing side effects, their respective relationships with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) after transplantation remain unclear. Therefore, this study aimed to elucidate the most effective induction regimen for AMR reduction through network analysis. METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search of databases, including basiliximab, alemtuzumab, antithymocyte globulin (ATG), and daclizumab as induction regimens for KT from inception to September 1, 2022. Using a network meta-analysis, we investigated the priorities of 5 induction regimens for patient survival, graft failure, and graft rejection after ABO-incompatible KT. RESULTS: In total, 25 studies comprising 1768 people were included in this network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the AMR rate of other induction regimens compared with that of basiliximab, whereas the secondary outcomes were heart failure, stroke, hospitalization, peripheral artery disease, myocardial infarction, anemia, leukopenia, herpes zoster, or adverse events. Notably, ATG reduced the AMR rate by 59% (odds ratio, 0.41; 95% credible interval, 0.20-0.90), whereas the other drugs did not show statistical significance. Furthermore, secondary outcomes did not significantly differ between the induction regimens. CONCLUSION: ATG is widely used in KT induction regimens. Our results showed that ATG reduced the risk of AMR in KT recipients when compared with other induction drugs; therefore, it appears to be an efficient choice of induction regimen to reduce AMR after KT.

Mesenchymal stromal cells plus basiliximab improve the response of steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease as a second-line therapy: a multicentre, randomized, controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: For patients with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD), effective second-line regimens are urgently needed. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) have been used as salvage regimens for SR-aGVHD in the past. However, clinical trials and an overall understanding of the molecular mechanisms of MSCs combined with basiliximab for SR-aGVHD are limited, especially in haploidentical haemopoietic stem cell transplantation (HID HSCT). METHODS: The primary endpoint of this multicentre, randomized, controlled trial was the 4-week complete response (CR) rate of SR-aGVHD. A total of 130 patients with SR-aGVHD were assigned in a 1:1 randomization schedule to the MSC group (receiving basiliximab plus MSCs) or control group (receiving basiliximab alone) (NCT04738981). RESULTS: Most enrolled patients (96.2%) received HID HSCT. The 4-week CR rate of SR-aGVHD in the MSC group was obviously better than that in the control group (83.1% vs. 55.4%, P = 0.001). However, for the overall response rates at week 4, the two groups were comparable. More patients in the control group used ≥ 6 doses of basiliximab (4.6% vs. 20%, P = 0.008). We collected blood samples from 19 consecutive patients and evaluated MSC-derived immunosuppressive cytokines, including HO1, GAL1, GAL9, TNFIA6, PGE2, PDL1, TGF-ß and HGF. Compared to the levels before MSC infusion, the HO1 (P = 0.0072) and TGF-ß (P = 0.0243) levels increased significantly 1 day after MSC infusion. At 7 days after MSC infusion, the levels of HO1, GAL1, TNFIA6 and TGF-ß tended to increase; however, the differences were not statistically significant. Although the 52-week cumulative incidence of cGVHD in the MSC group was comparable to that in the control group, fewer patients in the MSC group developed cGVHD involving ≥3 organs (14.3% vs. 43.6%, P = 0.006). MSCs were well tolerated, no infusion-related adverse events (AEs) occurred and other AEs were also comparable between the two groups. However, patients with malignant haematological diseases in the MSC group had a higher 52-week disease-free survival rate than those in the control group (84.8% vs. 65.9%, P = 0.031). CONCLUSIONS: For SR-aGVHD after allo-HSCT, especially HID HSCT, the combination of MSCs and basiliximab as the second-line therapy led to significantly better 4-week CR rates than basiliximab alone. The addition of MSCs not only did not increase toxicity but also provided a survival benefit.

Comparative analysis of Basiliximab and Alemtuzumab induction therapies in blood type A2-to-B kidney transplantation: Impact on kidney function and de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies.

PURPOSE: Blood group B kidney transplant candidates have lower transplantation rates and longer waiting times compared to other blood groups. Kidney transplantation from blood group A2-to-B has offered a solution for these patients. This study aimed to investigate the impact of Basiliximab and Alemtuzumab induction therapies on kidney function and de novo donor-specific antibodies (DSA) in blood type A2-to-B kidney transplant recipients within the first 12 months of post-transplant. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 110 consecutive A2-to-B kidney transplant recipients between January 2015 and December 2022. Of these, 46 (41.8%) received Basiliximab, while 64 (58.2%) received Alemtuzumab as induction therapy. Demographics and comorbidities data were collected and compared between the two groups. Serum samples collected at 4- and 12-month intervals post-transplant were used to assess the presence of de novo DSA. Kidney allograft function was evaluated by monitoring serum creatinine levels and assessing Creatinine Clearance based on 24-h urine collection at various time points. RESULTS: During the follow-up period, 20.00% of patients who received Alemtuzumab developed de novo DSA, whereas none of the patients induced with Basiliximab developed de novo DSA (p = 0.038). Recipients who received Basiliximab were older (mean age = 72.00) and received higher Kidney Donor Profile Index (KDPI) kidneys (mean = 75) compared to those induced with Alemtuzumab (mean age = 58.00, mean KDPI = 49) (p < 0.001), with no significant difference observed in the last follow-up creatinine clearance or creatinine levels between the two groups (p = 0.28). CONCLUSION: The use of Basiliximab as induction immunosuppression in A2-to-B kidney transplant recipients is associated with a lower incidence of de novo HLA DSA formation without significant differences in overall renal function compared to Alemtuzumab.

Does the induction immunotherapy (basiliximab) influence the early acute cellular rejection index after orthotopic heart transplantation?- Preliminary assessment report.

The study aimed to determine the influence of induction therapy on the acute cellular rejection (ACR) index in adult heart transplant recipients during the one-year observation. The study population consisted of 256 consecutive adult patients (pts), aged 51.5 (±11.9) years, 199 (77%) men treated with orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) in the period between 2015 and 2020 in a single high-volume heart transplant center. The endomyocardial biopsies (EMBs) were performed according to the protocol consisting of 7 protocolary EMBs for up to 3 months and 10 EMBs for up to one year after OHT. The rejection index (ACRI) was calculated as the number of scheduled EMBs with the ACR ≥ 2 divided by the total number of protocolary EMBs. The study population was divided into two groups according to the application of basiliximab. The total number of pts. who received basiliximab was 10 (3.9%). The main indications for the usage of the induction therapy were heart retransplantation, mechanical circulatory support (MCS), severe renal insufficiency (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2), and a panel of reactive antibody (PRA) > 10%. In the group with induction, the mean age was 49 (±14) years; 3 (30%) patients had the MCS prior to OHT, and 3 (30%) patients had heart retransplantation. Four (40%) patients had diabetes mellitus, and 4 (40%) patients had severe renal insufficiency. As maintenance therapy during the observation period, tacrolimus was given to 10 (100%) patients, everolimus to 2 (20%) patients, and MPA to 9 (90%) patients. In the group with no induction, the mean age was 51.8 (±12) years, MCS was used in 56 (23%) patients, 2 (0.8%) patients were retransplanted; 10 (4%) patients had eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2 and 58 (24%) patients had diabetes. Tacrolimus was administered to 243 (99%) patients, cyclosporine to 3 (1%), everolimus to 40 (16%), and mycophenolate to 245 (99.6%) heart recipients. The median one-year ACRI was 0.0, IQR:0.0-0.08 in the group with induction vs. 0.077, IQR: 0.0-0.154 with no induction; p = 0.11. ACRI up to three months was significantly higher in the entire cohort in comparison to up to one year (P < 0.01). The multivariate analysis showed that only everolimus implementation and younger age at the time of transplant influenced patients' mortality rate (P < 0.01). Significant graft rejections (≥ 2R ISHLT) are most common in the first three months after OHT. Patients who are initially at high risk of significant cellular rejection may benefit from induction therapy.

Significant Increase in Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection in Solid Organ Transplants Associated With Increased Use of Thymoglobulin as Induction Therapy?

BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains one of the most common viral pathogens affecting solid organ transplants (SOT). In 10 years of following the outcome of transplants, we noticed an increased incidence of CMV infection, along with increased use of rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin (rATG). The study aims to assess the incidence of active CMV infection and disease, response to treatment, and recurrence in a cohort of SOT. Furthermore, we look for correlating the CMV incidence with the type of induction therapy: r-ATG or interleukin 2 receptor-blocking antibody (basiliximab). METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective 10-year study in patients submitted to kidney, kidney-liver, and kidney-pancreas transplants who used a preemptive therapy protocol for CMV. RESULTS: Among the 476 enrolled transplant recipients, 306 (64.2 %) had at least one episode of CMV infection (replication), and 71/306 patients (23.2 %) presented CMV-related disease. The most frequent clinical conditions associated with CMV disease were gastrointestinal. Among the 476 transplant patients, 333 received immunosuppressive induction with rATG (69.9 %); 140 (29.4 %) received induction with interleukin 2 receptor-blocking antibody (basiliximab). The initial maintenance immunosuppressive therapy in the patients who presented CMV infection was primarily performed with prednisone, tacrolimus, and sodium mycophenolate (91.7 %). The induction with rATG increased from 35.2%-94.6% in 10 years. The incidence of CMV infection was 20.7 % in the first year of observation and gradually increased to 87.3 % in the last year. CONCLUSIONS: The data suggest that the increase in the use of rATG in recent years could be responsible for the very expressive increase in the incidence of CMV infection/disease.

Ruxolitinib versus basiliximab for steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease: a retrospective study.

Acute graft-versus-host disease (aGVHD) remains a major limitation of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; not all patients respond to standard glucocorticoids treatment. This study retrospectively evaluated the effects of ruxolitinib compared with basiliximab for steroid-refractory aGVHD (SR-aGVHD). One hundred and twenty-nine patients were enrolled, 81 in ruxolitinib and 48 in basiliximab group. The overall response (OR) at day 28 was higher in ruxolitinib group (72.8% vs. 54.2%, P = 0.031), as with complete response (CR) (58.0% vs. 35.4%, P = 0.013). Ruxolitinib led to significantly lower 1-year cumulative incidence of chronic GVHD (cGVHD) (29.6% vs. 43.8%, P = 0.021). Besides, ruxolitinib showed higher 1-year overall survival (OS) and 1-year cumulative incidence of failure-free survival (FFS) (OS: 72.8% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.008; FFS: 58.9% vs. 39.6%, P = 0.014). The 1-year cumulative incidence of non-relapse mortality (NRM) was lower in ruxolitinib group (16.1% vs. 37.5%, P = 0.005), and the 1-year relapse was not different. The 1-year cumulative incidence of cytomegalovirus (CMV) viremia, CMV-associated diseases and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV)-associated diseases was similar between the two groups, but EBV viremia was significantly lower in ruxolitinib group (6.2% vs. 29.2%, P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses revealed that OR and survival were similar in ruxolitinib 5 mg twice daily (bid) and 10 mg bid groups. However, ruxolitinib 10 mg bid treatment markedly reduced 1-year cumulative incidence of cGVHD compared with 5 mg bid (21.1% vs. 50.0%, P = 0.016). Our study demonstrated that ruxolitinib was superior to basiliximab in SR-aGVHD treatment and cGVHD prophylaxis, therefore should be recommended.

Basiliximab therapy for immune-mediated bowel disease in a pediatric heart transplant patient.

In pediatric patients who undergo heart transplantation, severe immune-mediated bowel disease has been reported. Management is complex, and there are little data discussing the use of basiliximab for immune-mediated bowel disease. This case report discusses a pediatric patient who developed immune-mediated bowel disease following heart transplantation and was successfully managed with basiliximab.

Basiliximab is associated with a lower incidence of De novo donor-specific HLA antibodies in kidney transplant recipients: A single-center experience.

PURPOSE: Induction immunosuppression has improved the long-term outcomes after kidney transplant. This study explores the association of different induction immunosuppression medications (Basiliximab vs. Alemtuzumab vs. rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin) used at the time of kidney transplant with the development of de novo donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA) in the first 12 months post-transplant period. METHODS: A total of 390 consecutive kidney transplant recipients (KTR), between 2016 and 2018, were included in the analysis. A 104 (26.6%) received Basiliximab, 186 (47.6%) received Alemtuzumab, and 100 (25.6%) received rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (rATG) for induction. All recipients had a negative flow cytometry crossmatch before transplant. Serum samples at 4- and 12-months post-transplant were assessed for the presence of de novo HLA DSA. kidney allograft function was compared among the three groups with calculated Creatinine Clearance on 24 h urine collection. RESULTS: De novo HLA DSA were detected in total of 81 (20.8%) patients within 12 months post-transplant. De novo HLA DSA were detected in 12/104 (11.5%), 43/186 (23.11%), and 26/100 (26%) KTR that received Basiliximab, Alemtuzumab, and rATG respectively (p = 0.006). KTR that received Basiliximab were significantly older, and the last follow-up creatinine clearance was significantly lower at 42 ml/min compared to KTR that received Alemtuzumab or rATG (p = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Induction immunosuppression utilizing Basiliximab is associated with significant reduction in development of de novo DSA within the first 12-months post kidney transplant but had lower creatinine clearance with long-term follow up.

Impact of induction therapy on cytomegalovirus infection and post-transplant outcomes in pediatric heart transplant recipients receiving routine antiviral prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVES: Induction therapy has been increasingly used in pediatric heart transplantation. This study evaluated the impact of anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) versus basiliximab as induction therapy on post-transplant cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection, rejection at 1 year, coronary allograft vasculopathy (CAV), and mortality in pediatric heart transplant recipients receiving antiviral prophylaxis. RESULTS: Of the 96 patients (age < 18 years) analyzed, 46 (47.9%) patients received basiliximab, and 50 (52.1%) received ATG. Median follow-up was 3.0 (IQR, 1.7-4.9) years with 32.3% reporting CMV infection. The ATG group, as compared with the basiliximab group, had similar incidences of CMV infection (36% vs. 28.3%, p = .418), CMV viremia (22% vs. 19.6%, p = .769), and CMV-positive tissue biopsy (30% vs. 22%, p = .486). The ATG group had lower incidences of rejection at 1 year (16% vs. 36.9%, p = .022) and CAV (4% vs. 23.9%, p = .006) with no difference in mortality (8% vs. 15.2%, p = .343), compared with the basiliximab group. Multivariate analysis showed that induction with ATG was associated with a lower risk of rejection at 1 year (OR, .31; 95% CI, .09-.94; p = .039) with no impact on the incidences of CMV infection (HR, 2.06; 95% CI, .54-7.89; p = .292), CAV (HR, .30; 95% CI, .04-2.58; p = .275), and mortality (HR, .39; 95% CI, .09-1.82; p = .233) compared to basiliximab induction. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, induction with ATG was associated with reduction in risk of rejection at 1 year with no effects on CMV infection, CAV, and mortality in pediatric heart transplant recipients with universal antiviral prophylaxis compared with basiliximab induction therapy.

Basiliximab as maintenance immunosuppression in heart transplant recipients: A single pediatric center experience.

BACKGROUND: Pediatric heart transplant recipients are at risk for complications from prolonged exposure to immunosuppressive drugs, pharmacokinetic challenges in maintaining consistent immunosuppression, and medication non-adherence. Basiliximab (BAS), an interleukin-2 receptor antagonist, is used for induction therapy across many pediatric heart transplant centers, but use as maintenance immunosuppression has not been well described. METHODS: This was a retrospective, single pediatric center cohort study of heart transplant recipients who received BAS for maintenance immunosuppression (defined as >2 monthly doses) from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2021. RESULTS: Ten patients met study criteria with a median age of 17.5 (5-22) years and median 9.6 (1.2-18.9) years since transplant at time of BAS initiation. The primary indications for BAS use were recurrent rejection (n = 4), fluctuating immunosuppression levels (n = 3), and renal dysfunction (n = 3). A median of 5.5 (3-32) monthly BAS doses were received. Three patients had a rejection event while on BAS. Calcineurin inhibitor exposure was reduced in 70% of patients. Three of the 10 patients were alive at last follow-up. There was one documented infection during BAS use, and no hypersensitivity reactions. CONCLUSIONS: Monthly BAS infusions were well tolerated and allowed for reduced calcineurin inhibitor exposure in most patients. Mortality commonly occurred despite BAS use, potentially reflecting the acuity of this patient cohort. BAS can be considered for maintenance immunosuppression in pediatric patients with fluctuating immunosuppressive levels and/or renal dysfunction. More studies are needed to determine long-term outcomes and explore expanded use of BAS in the pediatric heart transplant population.

Outcomes after anti-thymocyte globulin vs Basiliximab induction before deceased donor kidney transplants.

BACKGROUND: Deceased donor kidney transplants represent an important source of renal replacement for the 100 000 patients initiating hemodialysis annually. We compared the association of induction therapy, anti-thymocyte globulin [rabbit] (rATG) or basiliximab, with posttransplant rejection, graft and patient survival. METHODS: Using the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database, we identified patients that received deceased donor kidney transplants. The outcomes analyzed were 6- month rejection, 1-year rejection, patient survival and graft survival. Multivariate logistic regression models were constructed to understand the association of induction therapy and rejection. Cox-proportional hazards models were constructed to ascertain the association of choice of induction therapy with both patient and graft survival. RESULTS: Of 45 339 patients, 33 906 patients received rATG induction therapy and 11 433 patients received basiliximab induction therapy. The rATG group were younger (53.44 years vs 55.28 years, P < 0.001), more frequently female (58.74% male vs 66.08%, P < 0.001) and more frequently Black (34.78% vs 25.66%, p < 0.001) compared with patients in the basiliximab group. Rejection was more likely with basiliximab compared with rATG at 6 months(OR = 1.64, P < 0.001; 7.81% Basiliximab vs 5.23% rATG)and at 12 months (OR = 1.56, P < 0.001; 8.81% Basiliximab vs 6.31% rATG). Basiliximab induction therapy was associated with worse patient survival, (HR = 1.05, P = 0.017). Basiliximab induction therapy was associated with worse graft survival, (HR = 1.03, P = 0.037). CONCLUSION: The analysis of the national experience demonstrated favorable rejection, patient survival, and graft survival with rATG usage. Further prospective data are necessary to provide treatment recommendations.

Inducción con timoglobulina: ¿incrementa el riesgo hemorrágico en receptores renales sensibilizados? / Could thymoglobulin increase hemorrhagic risk in the perioperative transplantation period of sensitized kidney recipients?

Objetivo: Se ha descrito que la timoglobulina podría aumentar el riesgo de infecciones y neoplasias, en comparación con basiliximab. La leucocitopenia y la trombocitopenia también son más frecuentes en los primeros días tras el trasplante en los pacientes tratados con timoglobulina.Nuestro objetivo fue analizar las complicaciones hemorrágicas en este subconjunto de pacientes.Material y métodos: Se evaluaron las complicaciones hemorrágicas en 515 trasplantes renales realizados en nuestra institución entre 2012 y 2018. Se comparó a los pacientes tratados con timoglobulina (grupo 1, N=91) con los tratados con basiliximab (grupo 2, N=424).Resultados: Encontramos diferencias en cuanto al descenso plaquetario: 95.142,2 (55.339,6) en el grupo 1 y 52.364,3 (69.116,6) en el grupo 2 (p=0,001), número de pacientes con trombocitopenia grave (< 7.5000/mm3) (20,8% vs. 3,7%, p=0,001), número de concentrados de hematíes transfundidos (3,25 [0,572] vs. 2,2 [0,191], p=0,028) y porcentaje de pacientes que requirieron reintervención por sangrado (18,2% vs. 7,7%, p=0,046). En un análisis multivariable de regresión lineal múltiple (la variable dependiente fue el número de concentrado de hematíes transfundidos), solo la edad (OR 0,037, IC del 95%, 0,003-0,070) y el tipo de inmunosupresión (OR 1,592, IC del 95%, 1,38-2,84) tuvieron significación estadística.Conclusiones: El uso de timoglobulina en el período perioperatorio del trasplante podría aumentar las complicaciones hemorrágicas. En nuestra serie, la trombocitopenia grave y el sangrado activo que requirió reintervención, fueron 6 y 2,5 veces más frecuente, respectivamente, en el grupo de pacientes con timoglobulina. En lugar de suspender el uso de este agente inmunosupresor, se podría ajustar la dosis para continuar con el tratamiento.Se debe evaluar el uso de timoglobulina en el postoperatorio de estos pacientes (AU)

Objective: It has been described that thymoglobulin could increase the risk of infections and malignancies, in comparison to basiliximab. Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia are also more common within the first days after transplantation among thymoglobulin patients. Our objective was to analyze bleeding complications in this subset of patients.Material and methods: Bleeding complications were evaluated among 515 renal transplants carried out at our institution between 2012 and 2018. We compared patients treated with thymoglobulin (Group 1, N=91) with those treated with basiliximab (Group 2, N=424).Results: We found differences in platelet decrease:95142.2 (55,339.6) in Group 1 and 52,364.3 (69,116.6) in Group 2 (P=.001), number of patients with severe thrombocytopenia (<75,000/mm3) (20.8% vs. 3.7%, P=.001), number of blood units transfused (3.25 (0.572) vs. 2.2 (0.191, P=.028) and percentage of patients that required surgery due to bleeding (18.2% vs. 7.7%, P=.046). In a multiple lineal regression multivariable analysis (dependent variable was number of blood units transfused), only age [OR 0.037, 95% CI (0.003-0.070)] and type of immunosuppression [OR 1.592, 95% CI (1.38-2.84)] showed statistical significance.Conclusions: The use of thymoglobulin in the perioperative transplantation period could increase bleeding complications. In our series, in the group of patients with thymoglobulin, severe thrombocytopenia was 6 times more frequent, and active bleeding that required surgery was also 2.5 times more frequent. One way to continue with the use of this immunosuppression agent, might be to adjust the dose instead of discontinuing it. The use of thymoglobulin should be a factor to consider in the postoperative period of these patients (AU)

Treatment Options in Refractory Autoimmune Encephalitis.

Autoimmune encephalitis represents a potentially treatable immune-mediated condition that is being more frequently recognized. Prompt immunotherapy is a key factor for the management of autoimmune encephalitis. First-line treatments include intravenous steroids, plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulins, which can be combined in most severe cases. Rituximab and cyclophosphamide are administered as second-line agents in unresponsive cases. A minority of patients may still remain refractory, thus representing a major clinical challenge. In these cases, treatment strategies are controversial, and no guidelines exist. Treatments proposed for refractory autoimmune encephalitis include (1) cytokine-based drugs (such as tocilizumab, interleukin-2/basiliximab, anakinra, and tofacitinib); (2) plasma cell-depleting agents (such as bortezomib and daratumumab); and (3) treatments targeting intrathecal immune cells or their trafficking through the blood-brain barrier (such as intrathecal methotrexate and natalizumab). The efficacy evidence of these drugs is mostly based on case reports or small case series, with few reported controlled studies or systematic reviews. The aim of the present review is to summarize the current evidence and related methodological issues in the use of these drugs for the treatment of refractory autoimmune encephalitis.

Induction therapy in lung transplantation: A contemporary analysis of trends and outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: We provide a contemporary consideration of long-term outcomes and trends of induction therapy use following lung transplantation in the United States. METHODS: We reviewed the United Network for Organ Sharing registry from 2006 to 2018 for first-time, adult, lung-only transplant recipients. Long-term survival was compared between induction classes (Interleukin-2 inhibitors, monoclonal or polyclonal cell-depleting agents, and no induction therapy). A 1:1 propensity score match was performed, pairing patients who received basiliximab with similar risk recipients who did not receive induction therapy. Outcomes in matched populations were compared using Cox, Kaplan-Meier and Logistic regression modeling. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: 22 025 recipients were identified; 8003 (36.34%) were treated with no induction therapy, 11 045 (50.15%) with basiliximab, 1556 (7.06%) with alemtuzumab and 1421 (6.45%) with anti-thymocyte globulin. Compared with those who received no induction, patients receiving basiliximab, alemtuzumab or anti-thymocyte globulin were found on multivariable Cox-regression analyses to have lower long-term mortality (all p < .05). Following propensity score matching of basiliximab and no induction populations, analyses demonstrated a statistically significant association between basiliximab use and long- term survival (p < .001). Basiliximab was also associated with a lower risk of acute rejection (p < .001) and renal failure (p = .002). CONCLUSION: Induction therapy for lung transplant recipients-specifically basiliximab-is associated with improved long-term survival and a lower risk of renal failure or acute rejection.