Effect of opicapone multiple-dose regimens on levodopa pharmacokinetics.

AIMS: To compare the levodopa/carbidopa (LC) and levodopa/benserazide (LB) pharmacokinetic profiles following repeated doses of opicapone (OPC) administered apart from levodopa. METHODS: Two randomized, double blind, sex-balanced, placebo-controlled studies in four groups of 12 or 18 healthy subjects each. In each group, enrolled subjects received a once-daily morning (5, 15 and 30 mg) or evening (5, 15 and 50 mg) administration of OPC or placebo for up to 28 days. On the morning of Day 11, 12 h after the OPC or placebo evening dose, or the morning of Day 21, 1 h after the OPC or placebo dose, a single dose of immediate-release 100/25 mg LC was administered. Similarly, on Day 18 morning, 12 h after the OPC or placebo evening dose, or Day 28 morning, 1 h after the OPC or placebo dose, a single dose of immediate-release 100/25 mg LB was administered. RESULTS: All OPC treatments, in relation to the placebo group, presented a higher extent of exposure (AUC) to levodopa following either LC or LB doses. A relevant but not dose-dependent increase in the levodopa AUC occurred with all OPC dose groups in relation to placebo. All active treatments significantly inhibited both peak (Emax ) and extent (AUEC) of the catechol-O-methyltransferase activity in relation to placebo. The tolerability profile was favourable. CONCLUSION: Opicapone, as once-daily oral evening regimen and/or 1 h apart from levodopa therapy, increases the bioavailability of levodopa associated with its pronounced, long-lasting and sustained catechol-O-methyltransferase inhibition. The tolerability profile was favourable and similar between OPC and placebo.

Application of ionic liquid-TiO2 nanoparticle modified carbon paste electrode for the voltammetric determination of benserazide in biological samples.

An ionic liquid-TiO2 nanoparticle modified carbon paste electrode (IL-TiO2/CPE) was used as a fast and sensitive tool for the investigation of the electrochemical oxidation of benserazide using voltammetry. This modified electrode has been fabricated using hydrophilic ionic liquid (n-hexyl-3-methylimidazolium hexafluoro phosphate) as a binder. The modified electrode offers a considerable improvement in voltammetric sensitivity toward benserazide, compared to the bare electrode. Using differential pulse voltammetry (DPV), the electrocatalytic oxidation peak current of benserazide shows a linear calibration curve in the range of 1.0-600 µmol L(-1) benserazide. The limit of detection was equal to 0.4 µmol L(-1). The relative standard deviation (RSD%) for eight successive assays of 10 µmol L(-1) benserazide was 1.1%. Finally, the proposed method was successfully applied to the determination of benserazide in real samples such as blood serum and urine.

Simultaneous quantitation of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa in human plasma by HPLC-ESI-MS/MS: application for a pharmacokinetic study with a levodopa/benserazide formulation.

A sensitive and simple method was developed for the quantitation of levodopa and its metabolite 3-O-methyldopa, in human plasma, after oral administration of tablet formulations containing levodopa (200 mg) and benserazide (50 mg). The analytes were extracted by a protein precipitation procedure, using carbidopa as an internal standard. A mobile phase consisting of 0.2% formic acid and acetonitrile (94:6, v/v) was used and chromatographic separation was achieved using ACE C(18) column (50 mm×4.6 mm i.d.; 5 µm particle size). Selected reaction monitoring was performed using the fragmentation transitions m/z 198→m/z 107, m/z 212→m/z 166 and m/z 227→m/z 181 for levodopa, 3-O-methyldopa and carbidopa, respectively. Calibration curves were constructed over the range 50.0-6000.0 ng/mL for levodopa and 25.0-4000.0 ng/mL for 3-O-methyldopa. The method shown to be specific, precise, accurate and provided recovery rates higher than 85% for all analytes. No matrix effect was detected in the samples. The validated method was applied in a pharmacokinetic study with a levodopa/benserazide tablet formulation in healthy volunteers.

Treatment of idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS) with slow-release valproic acid compared with slow-release levodopa/benserazid.

We aimed to compare the efficacy of valproic acid (VPA) on paresthesias and sleep in RLS to that of levodopa (LD). Twenty patients with idiopathic restless legs syndrome (RLS) were treated with 600 mg slow-release VPA and 200 mg slow-release LD+50mg benserazid in a randomized, placebo-controlled, cross-over, double-blind setting with polysomography (PSG) at the end of each 3-week treatment periods. There was no major difference between the efficacy of valproic acid or LD. Periodic leg movements in sleep (PLMS) and PLM arousal index (PLMAI) significantly decreased with LD (p < or= 0.005). However, LD, but not VPA, significantly increased arousals not associated with PLMS (p = 0.002). Decrease of intensity and duration of RLS symptoms were more pronounced with VPA (p < or= 0.022) than with LD (NS). We conclude that slow-release VPA provides a treatment alternative for RLS.

Effects of food on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa in a dual-release formulation.

The objective was to assess the effect of food on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa after administration of a new levodopa/benserazide formulation with a dual-release drug delivery profile (Madopar DR). In an open-label, two-way cross-over study, 19 healthy volunteers who had fasted overnight were randomized to receive a single oral dose of levodopa/benserazide (200/50 mg) in the absence or presence of a standardized, high-fat breakfast, administered 30 min before drug administration. The treatment periods (fasting, non-fasting) were preceded by a baseline regimen of levodopa/benserazide (100/25 mg t.i.d. for 6 or 7 days). Blood samples were taken at specific times over a 12-hour period. Plasma concentrations of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography for pharmacokinetic evaluation. The parameter C(max) of levodopa was significantly lower and t(max) longer under postprandial conditions than under fasting conditions (mean C(max) 1.41 vs. 2.09 mg l(-1); mean t(max) 3.1 vs. 1.0 h). With food, the area under the curve (AUC) of levodopa was equivalent to that following an overnight fast. Compared with volunteers who had fasted, food did not alter t(1/2). Estimates of C(max), t(max) and AUC of 3-O-methyldopa under non-fasting conditions were not significantly different from those under fasting conditions. In conclusion, food decreases the rate of levodopa absorption, but had no effect on the systemic exposure to levodopa and the degree of 3-O-methyldopa formation. Standardization of levodopa/benserazide administration with respect to meal times is recommended.

COMT inhibition by tolcapone further improves levodopa pharmacokinetics when combined with a dual-release formulation of levodopa/benserazide. A novel principle in the treatment of Parkinson's disease.

The objective of the study reported here was the investigation of the effect of catechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT) inhibition by tolcapone on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa (3-OMD) after administration of a new dual-release formulation (dual-RF) of levodopa/benserazide (200/50). The study had a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized, crossover design and was conducted in 18 healthy young subjects. On the 2 treatment days, separated by a washout period of 7 days, the dual-RF was administered in combination (blinded) with tolcapone (200 mg) or placebo. Both treatment combinations were well tolerated. Tolcapone increased the bioavailability (AUC 0-infinity) and apparent elimination half-life (t(1/2)) of levodopa by 80 and 40%, respectively, compared to placebo. The maximal plasma concentration (Cmax) was slightly elevated by tolcapone. In the presence of tolcapone, formation of 3-OMD was substantially reduced. In conclusion, the effect of tolcapone on levodopa pharmacokinetics after administration of the dual-RF is similar to the one observed after immediate- and slow-RFs and leads to a marked improvement in levodopa pharmacokinetics and subsequently to an optimization of levodopa therapy.

Comparative single- and multiple-dose pharmacokinetics of levodopa and 3-O-methyldopa following a new dual-release and a conventional slow-release formulation of levodopa and benserazide in healthy subjects.

A multiple-dose study was performed to assess the pharmacokinetic profile of a new levodopa/benserazide dual-release formulation (DRF) in comparison with a conventional slow-release formulation (SRF). The study was of an open label, randomized, two-way cross-over design and was conducted in 18 subjects. Assessment of the two formulations was at day 1 (single-dose) and at day 7 after a 5-day t. i.d. pre-treatment (100 mg levodopa and 25 mg benserazide) in fasting state. The pharmacokinetic parameters reflecting bioavailability, accumulation and metabolism of levodopa were determined. The levodopa pharmacokinetics of the new DRF showed rapid absorption (tmax=1.1 h), followed by sustained levodopa plasma concentrations, similar to the SRF. Following multi-dose administration, the peak plasma concentration of the new DRF was 90% higher compared to the SFR (Cmax=2.1 and 1.1 microg/ml, respectively). The bioavailability was significantly increased by 40% (AUC0-infinity=6.1 and 4.3 microg x h/ml, respectively). The new DFR was well tolerated as shown by the low incidence of mild side effects. In conclusion, the results of this study confirmed the levodopa dual-release properties of this new levodopa/benserazide formulation.

Biochemical and neurophysiological investigations in two forms of Segawa's disease.

In two 14-year-old children with the typical clinical picture of Segawa's syndrome the metabolism of L-DOPA was examined and compared to an age matched control. The very different responses to DOPA- and benser-acid-medication underline the hypothesis, that Segawa's disease may result from at least two different pathological conditions. Since this disease mimics hereditary degenerative nervous tissue disorders, evoked potentials of both patients are demonstrated, showing that those pathways of the CNS, who can be examined by these methods, are unaffected.

Induction of aromatic-L-amino acid decarboxylase by decarboxylase inhibitors in idiopathic parkinsonism.

We evaluated the effect of administration of L-dopa, alone or in combination with a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor, on plasma levels of aromatic-L-amino acid decarboxylase (ALAAD). After single-dose administration of L-dopa plus benserazide (Madopar) in healthy subjects and in chronically treated patients with parkinsonism, plasma ALAAD followed for 2 to 3 hours fell, but returned to predosing levels within 90 minutes. Four groups of patients with idiopathic parkinsonism were studied during chronic treatment: Group I, no L-dopa treatment (n = 31); Group II, L-dopa alone (n = 15); Group III, L-dopa plus benserazide (n = 28); and Group IV, L-dopa plus carbidopa (Sinemet, n = 30). Plasma ALAAD 2 hours after dosing was normal in Groups I and II. ALAAD was increased threefold in Groups III and IV, suggesting induction of ALAAD by the coadministration of a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor. In a study of 3 patients in whom L-dopa/benserazide was started, plasma ALAAD rose gradually over 3 to 4 weeks. Further detailed pharmacokinetic studies of L-dopa, dopamine, and ALAAD in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid are required to determine if the apparent ALAAD induction by a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor may be related to the loss of clinical efficacy of combination therapy in some patients and how it is related to end-of-dose deterioration and on-off phenomena.

Treatment of idiopathic parkinsonism with L-dopa in the absence and presence of decarboxylase inhibitors: effects on plasma levels of L-dopa, dopa decarboxylase, catecholamines and 3-O-methyl-dopa.

The effect of levodopa (L-dopa), alone or in combination with a peripheral decarboxylase inhibitor (PDI), on plasma levels of aromatic-L-amino acid decarboxylase (ALAAD, = dopa decarboxylase), L-dopa, 3-O-methyl-dopa (3-OMD), dopamine (DA), noradrenaline, adrenaline and dopamine beta-hydroxylase has been studied. In healthy subjects and in patients with parkinsonism plasma ALAAD level fell after administration of L-dopa + benserazide, but returned to previous levels within 90 min. In a cross-sectional study blood was obtained, 2 h after dosing, from 104 patients with idiopathic parkinsonism, divided into four groups: no L-dopa treatment (group 1), L-dopa alone (group 2), L-dopa + benserazide (Madopar) (group 3) and L-dopa + carbidopa (Sinemet) (group 4). Plasma ALAAD, which was normal in groups 1 and 2, was increased 3-fold in groups 3 and 4, indicating that there was induction of ALAAD by the co-administration of PDI. Despite this induction of ALAAD, in groups 3 and 4, with half the daily L-dopa dose compared with group 2, plasma L-dopa and 3-OMD levels were 5 times higher, while plasma DA levels were not different. The DA/L-dopa ratio was decreased 5-fold in group 2 and 16-fold in groups 3 and 4 as compared with group 1. Neither 3-OMD levels nor 3-OMD/L-dopa ratios correlated with the occurrence of on-off fluctuations. In a longitudinal study of three patients started on Madopar treatment the induction of plasma ALAAD was found to occur gradually over 3-4 weeks. Further detailed pharmacokinetic studies in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid are required in order to elucidate whether the ALAAD induction by PDI may be related to the loss of clinical efficacy of combination therapy in some patients and how it is related to end-of-dose deterioration and on-off phenomena.

Bioavailability and acceptability of a dispersible formulation of levodopa-benserazide in parkinsonian patients with and without dysphagia.

The bioavailability of levodopa-benserazide in a standard capsule and a new dispersible tablet was compared in Parkinsonian patients, with (n = 8) and without (n = 8) swallowing difficulties. There was considerable variation within and between subjects, but no significant differences between formulations for any pharmacokinetic parameters, other than an earlier time-peak concentration following the dispersible tablets (P less than 0.01) in non-dysphagic patients. The acceptability of the dispersible tablets in the dysphagic patients was also determined following 7 days regular use. It was felt there were advantages in four of the patients because it was easier to administer or to swallow. The dispersible formulation may offer practical benefits to a minority of Parkinsonian patients without any anticipated loss of therapeutic efficacy.