Nine-year incidence of visual impairment in the Barbados Eye Studies.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the 9-year incidence of visual impairment and primary causes of blindness among black participants of the Barbados Eye Studies (BES). DESIGN: Population-based prospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: The BES followed a nationally representative cohort selected by simple random sampling, aged 40 to 84 years at baseline, with reexaminations after 4 years (Barbados Incidence Study of Eye Diseases [BISED]) and 9 years (BISED II). BISED II included 2793 (81%) of those eligible. METHODS: Cumulative 9-year incidence rates were estimated by the Product-Limit approach. The study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review boards of collaborating institutions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected visual acuity (VA) was assessed by the Ferris-Bailey chart, following a modified Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol. Low vision and blindness were defined by World Health Organization (WHO) criteria as VA <6/18 to 6/120, and <6/120, respectively, in the better eye, and by U.S. criteria as VA < or =20/40 and < or =20/200, respectively. Vision loss was defined as a decrease of 15 letters or more read correctly in the better eye between baseline and follow-up examinations. RESULTS: The 9-year incidence was 1.0% and 2.1% for blindness and 6.0% and 9.0% for low vision, by WHO and U.S. criteria, respectively. Older age at baseline was associated with higher incidence of low vision and blindness, reaching 23.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.8-28.0) and 4.3% (95% CI, 2.7-6.9) at age 70 years or more, based on WHO criteria. The primary causes of incident bilateral blindness (U.S. criteria) in 126 eyes were age-related cataract (48.3%), open-angle glaucoma (OAG) (14.3%), combined cataract and OAG (6.3%), diabetic retinopathy (8.7%), and optic atrophy (7.1%). Age-related macular degeneration (2.4%) rarely caused blindness. CONCLUSIONS: Incident visual impairment is exceedingly high in this population. Cataract, OAG, and diabetic retinopathy remain the major causes of blindness, underpinning the clinical and public health significance of these conditions in this and similar populations.

Natural history of the visual impairment of relapsing neuromyelitis optica.

PURPOSE: To describe the clinical features and natural history of the visual impairment of relapsing neuromyelitis optica. DESIGN: Prospective observational case series. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty patients of Afro-Caribbean origin with neuromyelitis optica and 47 patients with multiple sclerosis. METHODS: A complete ophthalmologic examination was performed with each ocular attack and during a remission period at least 6 months after the last attack. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of unilateral and bilateral optic neuritis and incidence of unilateral and bilateral severe visual loss, defined as visual acuity (VA) < or = 20/200. RESULTS: Twenty-eight patients (93%) with neuromyelitis optica were female and 2 (7%) were male. The mean age of onset was 30+/-10.5 years. Mean disease duration was 9.5+/-5.4 years. Neuromyelitis optica first manifested by an episode of optic neuritis in 23 cases (76.6%), bilateral in 4. The average number of ocular attacks per patient was 2.7+/-1.6. Twenty-one patients (70%) showed impairment in both eyes. Median times from onset to unilateral optic neuritis, bilateral optic neuritis, mono-ocular severe visual loss, and binocular severe visual loss were 0+/-0.08, 1+/-1.6, 2+/-0.8, and 13+/-3 years, respectively. Fifteen patients (50%) experienced severe visual loss in both eyes and 6 (20%) in one eye. Severe visual loss occurred in as few as 2 attacks. CONCLUSION: This study is the largest series of relapsing neuromyelitis optica in a population of African descent. Neuromyelitis optica's visual impairment is very severe; it contrasts drastically with that typically observed in multiple sclerosis. We confirmed that the prognosis for optic neuritis in patients with neuromyelitis optica is worse than the prognosis in patients with multiple sclerosis.

[Cataract blindness in people 50 years old or older in a semirural area of northern Peru]. / Ceguera por catarata en personas mayores de 50 años en una zona semirrural del norte del Perú

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of blindness and of cataract blindness in persons 50 years of age or older in Piura and Tumbes, which are two departments in northern Peru, and to describe the coverage and quality of cataract surgery services in that area, and the barriers that prevent access to those services. METHODS: Systematic sampling of persons 50 years old or older was done in Piura and Tumbes between August 2002 and March 2003, with 80 clusters of 60 people each being selected. Of the 4 800 persons chosen, 4,782 of them were examined, using a survey instrument that gathered general information on each person, the results of the visual acuity test and the lens examination, and information on cataract surgery or why that surgery had not been done. Visual acuity (VA) testing was done with a Snellen optotype with the letter "E," with sizes of 20/60 and 20/200 at distances of 6 m and 3 m, respectively, with the person using the visual correction (glasses) available. When the VA was less than 20/60 in one of the eyes, vision was tested with pinhole glasses. RESULTS: The prevalence of bilateral blindness (VA < 20/400) due to cataract, adjusted by age and sex, was 2.1% (95% confidence interval (CI): 1.7% to 2.6%). Among the 193 persons with bilateral blindness due to any cause, cataract was the cause in 104 of them (53.9%). The prevalence of blindness due to cataract or other causes increased with age and was higher in women than in men. Only 25% of the persons studied who needed cataract surgery had had that done. The prevalence of bilateral VA less than 20/200 due to unoperated cataract was 6.3% (95% CI: 5.3% to 7.3%); only 12% of the persons with that level of visual deficiency had had cataract surgery. The VA of 26% of the eyes operated on for cataract was lower than 20/200. The reasons given by persons who needed cataract surgery but who had not had it included not being able to pay for the operation (28%), lack of knowledge concerning cataracts (25%), fear of the operation (23%), and fear of completely losing their sight (17%). CONCLUSIONS: Most of the cases of blindness and of serious deficiency in visual acuity in persons 50 years old or older in Piura and Tumbes are due to uncorrected refractive defects, especially cataracts. The high prevalence of bilateral blindness due to cataracts (2.1%) could be reduced with measures that facilitate access to appropriate treatment.

Four-year incidence of visual impairment: Barbados Incidence Study of Eye Diseases.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the 4-year incidence of visual impairment and causes of blindness among black participants of the Barbados Eye Studies. DESIGN: Population-based incidence study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: The Barbados Incidence Study of Eye Diseases (BISED) followed the cohort of the Barbados Eye Study (BES), a prevalence study based on a simple random sample of Barbadians 40 to 84 years of age. BISED included 3193 black participants from the original cohort (85% of those eligible). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Best-corrected visual acuity (Ferris-Bailey chart) at baseline and follow-up was measured according to a modified Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol. By use of World Health Organization (WHO) criteria, low vision and blindness for an individual were defined as visual acuity (VA) <6/18 to 6/120 and <6/120, respectively, in the better eye. By commonly used US criteria, low vision and blindness were defined as VA < or = 20/40 and < or = 20/200, respectively. Vision loss was defined as a doubling of the visual angle (i.e., decrease of 15 letters or more read correctly between baseline and follow-up examinations). Progression was defined as vision loss among those with low vision at baseline. RESULTS: On the basis of WHO criteria, the overall 4-year incidence was 3.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 3.0%-4.4%) for low vision and 0.6% (95% CI, 0.4%-1.0%) for blindness. Incidence rates were higher using US criteria: 5.3% (95 % CI, 4.5%-6.2%) and 1.5% (95% CI, 1.1%-2.0%), respectively, reaching 21.5% and 7.3% for persons aged 70 years or older at baseline. One tenth of the cohort had vision loss, and 28.6% of those with low vision progressed. About one half of incident blindness was due to age-related cataract. Nearly one fifth was caused by open-angle glaucoma (OAG) alone or combined with cataract, and approximately 10% was caused by diabetic retinopathy (DR). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of visual impairment was high in this Afro-Caribbean population, particularly in older age groups, indicating the public health significance of visual loss for this and similar black populations. Cataract, OAG, and DR were among the leading causes of incident blindness, paralleling their high prevalence in this population.

Blindness, visual impairment and the problem of uncorrected refractive error in a Mexican-American population: Proyecto VER.

PURPOSE: To report the prevalence of blindness and visual impairment and the contribution of uncorrected refractive error to visual loss, in a population-based sample of Mexican Americans aged 40 and older. METHODS: Proyecto VER is a population-based study of blindness and visual impairment in Mexican Americans in Arizona. Block groups in Tucson and Nogales were randomly selected with probability proportional to the size of the Mexican-American population aged 40 and older. Participants had a complete ophthalmic evaluation, including assessment of presenting and best corrected visual acuity using standardized procedures. Those with presenting visual acuity worse than 20/30 had refraction to determine best corrected vision. A home questionnaire and a clinic examination provided data on education, perception of visual impairment, income, and acculturation. RESULTS: The prevalence of presenting visual acuity worse than 20/40 was 8.2%, with uncorrected refractive error accounting for 73% of the impaired acuity. In multivariate models comparing those who improved two or more lines on the acuity chart with proper refraction with those who had adequate optical correction, uncorrected refractive error showed a strong association with age, less than 13 years of education (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-2.0), low acculturation index (OR 1.3, CI 1.1-1.3), lack of insurance coverage (OR 1.4, CI 1.1-1.7), and not having seen an eye-care provider in the past 2 years (OR 2.5, CI 2.1-3.0). Prevalence of best corrected acuity worse than 20/40 increased from 0.3% in those aged 40 to 49 years to 18% in those aged 80 years or more. CONCLUSIONS: Visual loss in this Mexican-American population is higher than has been reported in whites and is comparable to that in African Americans. Almost three quarters of those with visual acuity impairment would improve with optical correction. Socioeconomic factors that are probable markers of limited access to health care services were associated with uncorrected refractive error. These data suggest that education programs and interventions to improve access to eye care could significantly decrease the burden of visual loss among Mexican Americans.

Prevalence and causes of visual impairment in The Barbados Eye Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence and causes of low vision and blindness in a predominantly black population. DESIGN: Population-based prevalence study of a simple random sample of Barbados-born citizens aged 40 to 84 years. PARTICIPANTS: Four thousand seven hundred nine persons (84% participation). METHODS: The standardized protocol included best-corrected visual acuity (with a Ferris-Bailey chart), automated perimetry, lens gradings (LOCS II), and an interview. Participants with visual acuity of worse than 20/30, other positive findings, and a 10% sample also had an ophthalmologic examination that evaluated the cause and extent of vision loss (resulting from that cause), if any. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Low vision and blindness were defined as visual acuity in the better eye between 6/18 and 6/120 and visual acuity worse than 6/120, respectively (World Health Organization [WHO] criteria). RESULTS: Of the 4631 participants with complete examinations, 4314 (93%) reported their race as black, 184 (4%) reported their race as mixed (black and white), and 133 (3%) reported their race as white or other. Low vision was found in 5.9% of the black, 2.7% of the mixed, and 3.0% of white or other participants. Bilateral blindness was similar for black and mixed race participants (1.7% and 1.6%, respectively) and was not found in whites. Among black and mixed participants, the prevalence of low vision increased with age (from 0.3% at 40-49 years to 26.8% at 80 years or older). The prevalence of blindness was higher (P < 0.001) for men than women at each age group (0.5% versus 0.3% at ages 40-49 and 10.9% versus 7.3% at 80 years or more). Sixty percent of blindness was due to open-angle glaucoma and age-related cataract, each accounting for more than one fourth of cases. Other major causes were optic atrophy or neuropathy and macular and other retinal diseases. Few cases of blindness were due to diabetic retinopathy (1.4%), and none were due to age-related macular degeneration. CONCLUSIONS: Using the WHO criteria, prevalence of visual impairment was high in this African-origin population, particularly at older ages. Most blindness was due to open-angle glaucoma and cataract, with open-angle glaucoma causing a higher proportion of blindness than previously reported. The increased prevalence of blindness in men may be due to the increased male prevalence of glaucoma in this population and warrants further investigation. Results underline the need for blindness prevention programs, with emphasis on effective treatment of age-related cataract and enhancing strategies for early detection and treatment of open-angle glaucoma.