An Updated Analysis of Body Contouring Malpractice Cases.

INTRODUCTION: Body contouring procedures are commonly performed in the United States for patients seeking to sculpt specific areas of their bodies. The aim of this study was to provide an updated analysis of the factors that influence medical malpractice litigation surrounding body contouring surgery. METHODS: The following terms were used to search the Westlaw Campus Legal research Database for cases with earliest documentation after January 2013: ("contouring" OR "abdominoplasty" OR "liposuction" OR "tummy tuck" OR "body lift" OR "thigh lift" OR "arm lift" OR "brachioplasty" OR "thighplasty" OR "lipectomy" OR "panniculectomy") AND "surgery" AND "medical malpractice." Cases were only included if there was a complaint of medical malpractice subsequent to a body contouring procedure, and details of the cases were provided. Information was collected on the location of the lawsuit, the earliest year of available case documentation, patient demographics, procedure(s) performed, alleged injury, specialty involvement, and verdicts. RESULTS: A total of 32 cases were included in the study. Most of the patients involved in the cases were women (n = 30, 93.8%) and alive (n = 28, 87.5%). New York state had the most cases (n = 7, 21.9%). Abdominoplasty (56.3%), liposuction (53.1%), and buttock augmentations (15.6%) were the most common procedures. Plastic surgeons were involved in 93.8% (n = 30) of the cases, and anesthesia, emergency medicine, dermatology, and oncology were also involved. Claims of malpractice most often discussed negligent technique (71.9%) and poor postoperative management (62.5%). Common postoperative complications were infection/sepsis (40.6%), scarring (31.3%), and emotional distress/prolonged pain (31.3%). One available ruling was in favor of the plaintiff. CONCLUSION: Although many of the cases in this analysis cited negligent technique, none were founded in their argument. Because involvement in these cases can place a burden on attending physicians, clear expectations of postoperative infections, scarring, and prolonged pain should be addressed during the informed consent process.

Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis Detects Body Fat Changes After Surgical Subcutaneous Fat Removal.

Background: The risk and metabolic effects of obesity are determined by the distribution of fat throughout the body. It has been proposed that the distribution of abdominal fat is more closely related to the metabolic risks of obesity. High prevalence of overweight and obesity has thereby contributed to an increased uptake of surgical subcutaneous fat removal (SSFR) procedures. The goal of this study was to determine whether bioelectrical impedance analysis (Tanita system) can be used to detect the removal of excess abdominal subcutaneous fat tissue during SSFR when studying the metabolic effects of such procedures. Methods: Study population comprised patients who received body contouring procedures at the Hamad General Hospital's plastic surgery department between November 2020 and December 2022. To evaluate the factors of interest, subjects were prospectively followed up at two time points: within 1 week before the surgery and within 1-2 weeks thereafter. The following factors were measured: body weight, body fat percentage, body fat mass, body mass index (BMI), fat-free mass, estimated muscle mass, total body water, visceral fat score, and basal metabolic rate. Results: In total, 22 patients were included in the study. The two visits' medians for height, weight, BMI, fat percent (fat%), fat mass, visceral fat rating, and Doi's weighted average glucose (dwAG) were compared. Only in the case of Tanita fat% and fat mass, were the preoperative and postoperative medians significantly different. Furthermore, there was no association between these Tanita measures and dwAG or homeostatic model assessment (HOMA; insulin resistance [IR]) changes (before and after surgery). Tanita measures overestimated fat loss, as seen by the mountain plot and Bland-Altman plot agreement methods. Conclusions: Our findings indicated that the only two Tanita measures exhibited meaningful early associations with the amount of tissue excised which were fat mass and fat% differences. Although dwAG and HOMA-IR are not impacted immediately postsurgery, a trend was seen that suggested improvements in those parameters, even though the changes are not clinically significant.

Danger Zones of the Gluteal Anatomy: Improving the Safety Profile of the Gluteal Fat Grafting.

INTRODUCTION: Knowledge of the vascular anatomy is critical to performing safe gluteal surgery. To date, only the course of the main blood vessels within the muscles has been outlined. These findings are based on MRI and CTA images that do not conform to a topographically standardized and normalized probability distribution. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to develop a three-dimensional mapping of the gluteal zones of high vascular density in relation to anatomical landmarks. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This single-center retrospective cohort analysis comprised all consecutive patients who underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans between January 2016 and October 2021. The location of blood vessels in the gluteal region was allometrically normalized in relation to anatomical landmarks. Moreover, the caliber and area of the blood vessels were assessed. RESULTS: CBCT scans of 32 patients with an average age of 64 ± 12 years (range 34-87 years) were included. Fifty-three percent were female. The median [IQR] caliber of the intramuscular gluteal vessels was 1.47 [1.15-1.88] mm, significantly greater than that of the subcutaneous vessels 1.09 [0.72-1.44] mm (p < 0.001). Vascular density was higher intramuscularly, as 4.5% of the area of the muscle was occupied by blood vessels, as opposed to 0.3% in the adipose tissue. CONCLUSION: The analysis of the CBCT scans showed a higher vascular density and larger vessels intramuscularly. We, therefore, recommend the injection of autologous fat merely to the subcutaneous plane. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE II: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Weight Loss After VASER-Assisted Liposuction.

BACKGROUND: Liposuction is one of the most common procedures used for body contouring. In this study, we aimed to determine whether there is a weight change with VASER-assisted liposuction (VAL) procedure and the demographic factors affecting it. METHODS: A total of 51 patients (30 females and 21 males) who underwent VAL between the years of 2020 and 2022 were included in the study. Participants' weights before VAL, body mass indexes (BMI), aspiration volumes, demographic data, and weights and BMIs one month after VAL were recorded and analyzed. In addition, the fat ratio in the aspirate was determined in ten patients. RESULTS: The mean aspiration volume with VAL was 4832.50 ± 2373.26 ml in females and 5176.90 ± 1602.61 ml in males. Body weights (baseline, 90.34 ± 9.17 vs. 71.01 ± 8.87; one month later, 86.95 ± 8.34 vs. 66.28 ± 10.04: p < 0.001) and BMIs (baseline, 28.59 ± 2.97 vs. 26.40 ± 3.69; one month later, 27.54 ± 2.92 vs. 24.59 ± 3.76: p = 0.009) were higher in males than females, both at baseline and after VAL. There was a significant decrease in body weights and BMIs after VAL in both females (4.73 ± 4.73 kg) and males (3.39 ± 4.27 kg) (p < 0.001). However, no correlation was observed between the decrease in body weights and BMIs after VAL and gender, age, aspirate volume, and fat volume. CONCLUSION: Although there was a decrease in mean body weight and mean BMI in both males and females one month after VAL, no associations were observed between weight drop after VAL and gender, age, aspiration volume, and fat volume. Level of Evidence IV This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these evidence-based medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Update on Oblique Flankplasty: Easily Executed, Long-Lasting, Integral Component of Total Body Lift Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Twenty years ago, coordinated aesthetic surgery for laxity and lipodystrophy after massive weight loss (MWL), so-called total body lift surgery (TBL), encompassed circumferential hip hugging transverse lower body lift (LBL) with possible buttock auto-augmentation, and a transverse bra line upper body lift (UBL) with breast reshaping. Brachioplasty and vertical thighplasty were often included. Disappointing aesthetics of the posterior torso led to innovation with J-torsoplasty and oblique flankplasty. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to demonstrate in a large clinical series and in a range of case presentations from 2 plastic surgeons that oblique flankplasty with lipoabdominoplasty (OFLA) optimally narrows the waist, suspends lateral buttocks and thighs, and integrates with J-torsoplasty and vertical thighplasty to tighten skin and aesthetically contour the torso and thighs with an acceptable rate of complications. METHODS: Retrospective chart review of 151 consecutive flankplasties between June 2010 and April 2023, including sex, age, BMI, associated operations, complications, and revisions was performed. Five case presentations were accompanied by limited photographs and a marking video. RESULTS: Across a broad clinical spectrum, malleable oblique flankplasty resected bulging flanks and, facilitated by neighboring liposuction and/or J-torsoplasty, consistently pulled in lax skin and anchored through cadaver-proven dense dermal adherences lax tissues to create a long-lasting skintight shapely torso and upper thighs, with only 3.3% problematic wounds. Five diverse cases showed broad applicability. CONCLUSIONS: OFLA, often with J-torsoplasty and neighboring liposuction, aesthetically recontours torso skin laxity in a variety of presentations with a low rate of complications in a high-risk population.

Opioid-Prescribing Patterns in Body Contouring Surgery.

BACKGROUND: The United States is experiencing the highest opioid overdose death rate in our nation's history. Misuse and addiction to opioids, including prescription pain relievers, is a serious national crisis that affects public health as well as social and economic welfare. OBJECTIVES: The aim of the study was to critically evaluate postoperative opioid-prescribing patterns. METHODS: The PearlDiver database (Colorado Springs, CO) was queried for body contouring patients from 2010 to 2020. We identified patients that underwent panniculectomy, abdominoplasty, brachioplasty, thighplasty, mastopexy, breast augmentation, breast reduction, and liposuction for analysis. We subsequently analyzed the opioid use, with a focus on comorbid conditions and complications that are associated with increased use of opioids. RESULTS: A total of 56,773 patients underwent body contouring surgery. The most common opioid prescribed was hydrocodone with acetaminophen (37,017 patients). Average days of therapy was 17.92 days. Comorbid conditions and postoperative complications were examined for risk of increased opioid prescriptions. Patients with peripheral vascular disease and smoking were prescribed significantly more morphine milliequivalents (MME) of opioids than patients without peripheral vascular disease (871.97 vs 535.41; P < .001) and smoking (1069.57 vs 440.84; P < .001). Patients who developed surgical site infection, disruption of wound, and venous thromboembolism were prescribed a significantly higher MME of opioids (1213.63 vs 561.59; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Our data provide information on opioid prescription patterns in the body contouring population, with focused review of comorbid conditions and complications in relation to opioid-prescribing patterns. We hope that the data will improve opioid prescription habits among plastic surgeons in the setting of a global opioid crisis.

Concurrent abdominal body contouring and hernia repair are safe choices: An analysis of the 2015-2020 ACS-NSQIP database.

BACKGROUND: Concurrent hernia repair (HR) with abdominal body contouring procedures (ABD), panniculectomy, and abdominoplasty, has been discussed as a strategy. The purpose of this study is to evaluate potential medical and surgical complications following concurrent ABD-HR, with a greater emphasis on cosmetic abdominoplasty. METHODS: The 2015-2020 ACS-NSQIP datasets were utilized to identify patients who underwent ABD or ABD-HR. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to reduce selection bias by equating groups (ABD vs. ABD-HR) based on covariates. Bivariate analyses of independent variables by our outcomes of interest were performed using the Pearson Chi-Square and Fisher's Exact tests for categorical variables and the Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables. RESULTS: Of the 14,115 patients identified in the ACS-NSQIP, 13,634 had ABD, while 481 had both ABD and HR. Following PS-matching of the cohorts, ABD (n = 481) and ABD-HR (n = 481), bivariate analysis of the combination of incisional, umbilical, and epigastric hernias indicated longer operative times (mean: 209.6 min) (P < 0.001) and a longer hospital length of stay (mean: 1.9 days) (P < 0.001). The incidence rate of postoperative complications such as wound dehiscence, deep venous thromboembolism, DVT, unplanned return to the OR within 30 days, and other medical complications revealed no significant differences between the two cohorts. A sub-group analysis of wound complications found no significant difference for any wound type. Analysis was also conducted for each type of hernia separately, yielding the same results. CONCLUSION: Our results show no increase in postoperative morbidity when combining ABD and HR compared to ABD alone, suggesting that these procedures can be safely performed concurrently and regardless of the type of hernia.

Treating Saddlebag Deformity after Massive Weight Loss: Vertical versus Lower Body Lift.

SUMMARY: The saddlebag deformity remains a persistent and difficult-to-treat problem after body-contouring surgery. A new way to handle the saddlebag deformity is with the vertical lower body lift (VLBL). This retrospective cohort study evaluated the overall reconstruction outcome of the VLBL in 16 patients (32 saddlebags) and compared it to standard lower body lift (LBL). The BODY-Q and the Pittsburgh Rating Scale (PRS)-Saddlebag Scale were used in the evaluation process. Surgical outcomes regarding the saddlebag deformity were in favor of the VLBL technique in patients with marked saddlebag deformity. A 1.16 decrease in mean PRS saddlebag score (relative change of 61.7%) was observed for the VLBL group versus a mean decrease of 0.29 (relative change of 21.6%) in the LBL group. BODY-Q end point and change in scores did not differ between the VLBL and LBL groups at 3-month follow-up, but at 1-year follow-up, they were in favor of the VLBL group in the body appraisal domain. Patients were highly satisfied with the contour and appearance of their lateral thigh, despite the extra scarring caused by this novel technique. Therefore, the authors advise clinicians to consider performing a VLBL instead of the standard LBL in patients with notable saddlebag deformities after massive weight loss. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.

Contemporary Lower Body Lift.

SUMMARY: Circumferential body contouring addresses abdominal, mons, lateral thigh, and buttock laxity. The goals of contouring are to optimize abdominal aesthetics while also addressing lateral thigh and buttock skin excess with an easily concealed scar. Key concepts in contemporary lower lift include a low anterior scar that gently slopes superior to help with waist accentuation and addressing lateral thigh contour. The posterior scar lies at the top of the gluteal crease to preserve the buttocks aesthetic unit, allow for autoaugmentation, and minimize wound-healing complications. Patient safety considerations include thromboembolism prevention, minimizing blood loss, and keeping the patient warm. With proper planning, the lower body lift effectively and aesthetically removes circumferential skin laxity.

From the SAFE to the SAFEST Liposuction: Combining PAL and RFAL Technology in Body Contouring Procedures.

BACKGROUND: The SAFE liposuction technique is a worldwide extended method used to achieve great and reproducible results after the surgical aspiration of fat. We propose an evolution of the technique to address one of the major limitations of liposuction, loose skin. The SAFEST liposuction technique combines PAL and RFAL to achieve skin tightening and fat reduction with minimal added morbidity. METHODS: Patients treated with the SAFEST liposuction technique between December 2019 and February 2022 were included in the study. Demographic and surgical data were collected retrospectively. Photographs and satisfaction interviews were conducted preoperatively and 12 months postoperatively in every case. RESULTS: Sixty-five patients (58 female and 7 male) were included in the cohort, and a total of 169 anatomical areas were treated with the SAFEST liposuction technique (abdomen, arms, back, flanks and thighs). Globally, satisfaction at 12 months follow-up was of 94.1% and complications only presented in 4.7% of the treated areas. 6 of the 38 treated abdomens (18.4%) presented a complication (4 seromas and 2 access point infections) and 2 of the 38 treated flanks (5.3%) presented one (2 seromas). The rest of the treated anatomical areas (arms, back and thighs) showed no complications and high satisfaction rates. CONCLUSIONS: The SAFEST liposuction technique achieves outstanding and satisfying results with minimal complications by safely combining the advantages of two different technologies, PAL and RFAL. The main advantages of the presented technique are the skin tightening, the body ligament contraction, the coagulation and the reduction of the operative time. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Efficacy of Endolift laser for arm and under abdomen fat reduction.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive laser for body fat contouring is a quickly growing field in the cosmetic dermatology. Surgical options carry disadvantages, such as the usage of anesthetics, swelling, pain and long time for recovery, so there is a growing public request for the techniques with fewer side effects and shorter recovery periods. Several new noninvasive body contouring ways have been advanced such as, cryolipolysis radiofrequency energy, suction-massage, high-frequency focused ultrasound, and laser therapy. Noninvasive laser improves the body's appearance by the elimination of excess adipose tissue, specifically in areas in which fat perseveres in spite of diet and exercise. METHODS: In this study the efficacy of Endolift laser was evaluated for reduction of excess fat in the arms and under abdomen. Ten patients with excess fat in the arms and under abdomen were enrolled in this study. The patients were treated by Endolift laser in the arms and under abdomen areas. The outcomes were evaluated by two blinded board certified dermatologists and by patients' satisfaction. The circumference of each arm and under abdomen was measured using a flexible tape measure. RESULTS: The results showed reduction in the fat and circumference of arms and under abdomen after treatment. The treatment was considered as effective methods with high patient satisfaction. Also no severe adverse effects were reported. CONCLUSION: Endolift laser can be a good alternative to surgical body fat contouring due to its efficacy, safety, minimal recovery time, low cost. Also Endolift laser does not require general anesthetics.

Retrospective Analysis of Predictive Factors for Complications in Abdominoplasty in Massive Weight Loss Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Ex-obese patients present with redundancy of abdominal skin and soft tissue due to massive weight loss (MWL). The plastic surgeon can restore the body shape through body contouring procedures. Hence the need to adequately direct patients to body contouring by identifying suitable candidates exists. Our work aims to retrospectively analyze the abdominoplasty complications in our case series to identify associated risk factors and evaluate the effect of combined procedures on abdominoplasty outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively investigated predictive factors of abdominoplasty procedure complications on 213 MWL patients who received abdominoplasty with and without rectus sheath plication, abdominal liposuction, and other body contouring procedures. We identified risk and protective factors with univariate and multivariate regression analysis. Furthermore, we assessed the impact of additional procedures on the complication rates. RESULTS: The overall complication rate was 49.8% (26.8% minor complications; 23% major complications). The delayed wound healing rate was 27.7%, and the revision surgery rate was 25.8% (14.7% early revision; 14.2% late revision). These results were compared with literature reports. Several negative predictors emerged as non-modifiable (advanced age, diabetes mellitus, surgical mode of weight loss) or modifiable (preoperative obesity and body mass index (BMI); active smoking; preoperative anemia; use of fibrin glue or quilting sutures). Performing rectus sheath plication improved most of the outcomes. Liposuction of hypochondriac regions and flanks led to increased safety and reduced the risk of surgical dehiscence and delayed wound healing, in contrast to epimesogastric liposuction. The other combined body contouring procedures did not worsen the outcomes, except for poor scarring. CONCLUSION: Our findings encourage us to continue associating rectus sheath plication, liposuction, and other body contouring surgeries with abdominoplasty. We emphasize the importance of proper patient selection, particularly with regard to anemia, before body contouring surgery in the interests of offering safe surgery and satisfactory results. Further studies are needed to investigate how the optimal BMI cut-off and abstinence from smoking (in terms of time) before surgery reduce postoperative complications. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors https://www.springer.com/journal/00266 .

FDA MAUDE database reported adverse events on noninvasive body contouring, cellulite treatment, and muscle stimulation from 2015 to 2021.

OBJECTIVE: Noninvasive cosmetic procedures have continued to gain popularity, owing to their short, in-office treatments combined with little to no downtime. These procedures are also highly accessible, even offered at medical spas by nonphysician operators. The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic also saw heightened interest in all cosmetic procedures, presumably as social distancing and stay-at-home orders allotted time and space for postop recovery. As the market for these procedures expand, a thorough understanding of potential adverse events is critical for providers to better counsel their patients on risks and expectations when obtaining informed consent. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We employed the Food and Drug Administration (FDA's) Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience (MAUDE) database (http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cdrh/cfdocs/cfmaude/search.cfm), which compiles medical device reports (MDRs) for suspected injuries from device use or malfunction, submitted by manufactures and operators. We focused our query on three main categories: noninvasive body contouring, cellulite treatments, and muscle stimulation therapies that utilize electromagnetic energy. The query was performed in February 2022 using a comprehensive list of product names and manufacturers. RESULTS: The initial search yielded 827 MDRs, which were individually reviewed for duplicate reports or insufficient data. Ultimately, 723 MDRs were analyzed (660 for noninvasive body contouring, 55 for cellulite treatment, and 8 for muscle stimulation). Paradoxical hyperplasia accounted for the majority of MDRs for noninvasive body contouring, while burns and scars were most common for muscle stimulation and cellulite treatments, respectively. Of the 7-year span we surveyed, 2021 accounted for 515 of the 723 total assessed MDRs (71.2%), the majority of which were from cryolipolysis procedures. CONCLUSION: The MAUDE database remains an essential tool to monitor potential adverse events of medical devices, including those utilized for noninvasive, cosmetic procedures. Insight from the MAUDE database can be clinically translated when discussing treatment options with patients, helping to optimize patient safety and satisfaction.

The Use of Mean Gray Value (MGV) as a Guide to Tension-Reducing Strategies in Body Contouring Surgery Reduces Wound-Related Morbidity.

BACKGROUND: Currently there are no known structural parameters of the integument that can be measured noninvasively which are used in the planning of body contouring surgery. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to see if mean gray value (MGV), when taken into account preoperatively, can reduce wound-related morbidity. METHODS: This project was a prospective cohort study. Ultrasound imaging of the subcutaneous tissue was performed prospectively on patients undergoing body contouring surgery to quantify the superficial fascial system so that average MGV could be calculated over the proposed surgical sites. Patients with average to poor MGV (≤0.127) were identified preoperatively for tension-reducing procedures. Wound complication rates were compared with rates in a retrospective cohort which did not undergo preoperative imaging. RESULTS: There were 115 patients in each of the 2 cohorts. There were 3 exclusions due to loss of ultrasound images, leaving 112 patients available for analysis in the prospective cohort. The cohorts were similar except for a higher incidence of patients with diabetes in the retrospective group (1 vs 9, P = 0.026). The wound complication rate was significantly reduced in the prospective group (5/112, 4.4%) when compared with the retrospective group (20/115, 17%, P = 0.0062). The revision and infection rates were also significantly reduced in the prospective group (1/112, 0.9%; 3/112, 2.6%) when compared with the retrospective group (8/115, 7%, P = 0.019; 10/115 8.6%, P = 0.051). CONCLUSIONS: MGV is a unique, patient- and area-specific structural parameter of the integument, and its measurement may be useful in reducing wound-related morbidity in body contouring surgery.