Psychosocial interventions for reduction of distress in children with leukemia during bone marrow aspiration and lumbar puncture.

BACKGROUND: Children with cancer undergo many invasive medical procedures that are often painful and highly distressing, including bone marrow aspiration (BMA) and lumbar puncture (LP). Psychosocial interventions have been demonstrated to reduce children's distress resulting from invasive medical procedures. The aim of the study is to assess the efficacy of psychosocial interventions to reduce distress in children with cancer undergoing BMA and LP in a pediatric cancer center in Taiwan. METHODS: Children with cancer who received treatment between March 2015 and December 2016 at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou, Taiwan were eligible for the study. The psychosocial intervention comprised preparation and cognitive behavioral intervention and was provided by a certified child life specialist. The assessment instrument was the revised version of the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress (OSBD-R). The behavioral distress of patients who underwent psychosocial interventions for BMA and LP was compared with patients without interventions. We also analyzed the difference of behavioral distress in patients' pre- and post-psychosocial intervention for BMA and LP. RESULTS: Eighteen patients were enrolled into this study. The mean age of diagnosis of leukemia was 6.6 years old (range: 3-11 years). Fifteen patients were diagnosed with acute lymphoblastic leukemia, and 3 were diagnosed with acute myeloid leukemia. The mean of OSBD-R total scores in 7 patients with psychosocial intervention was significantly lower than the mean score in 6 patients without intervention (0.65 vs. 4.81, p = 0.002). Pre- and post-psychosocial intervention for BMA and LP behavioral distress were evaluated for the remaining 5 patients. Consistently, there was a significant reduction of the OSBD-R score following interventions (3.04 vs. 7.81, p = 0.025). CONCLUSION: Psychosocial interventions provided by a certified child life specialist have a significant potential to reduce children's distress during BMA and LP in pediatric healthcare settings in Taiwan.

A New Mobile Application to Reduce Anxiety in Pediatric Patients Before Bone Marrow Aspiration Procedures.

OBJECTIVES: Insufficient preparation for children who are undergoing bone marrow aspiration can cause anxiety and negative outcomes. Nonpharmacological therapies have been proven to reduce fear in children who are undergoing painful procedures. We have therefore developed a mobile application to help reduce these patients' anxiety by providing them with procedural information and coping skills. METHODS: This single-blinded, randomized controlled trial included 60 patients age 5 to 12 years old who were undergoing bone marrow aspiration procedures in Thailand that were conducted between May 2015 and May 2016. Sixty participants were randomly assigned to the intervention group (mobile application added to usual care) or the control group (usual care only). Preprocedural anxiety levels were evaluated by visual analog scales (child anxiety visual analog scale); this was repeated in the intervention group immediately after patients used the mobile application. On the day of the procedure, the patients' cooperation levels were assessed by using the modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale. The total amount of sedative drugs that were used was also recorded. The paired t test and the Wilcoxon signed rank test were used to analyze within-person change, whereas the t test and the Wilcoxon rank sum test were used for group comparisons. RESULTS: The child anxiety visual analog scale score of patients in the intervention group decreased significantly after they used the mobile application (P < .0012). The modified Yale Preoperative Anxiety Scale score of patients in the intervention group was significantly lower than that in the control group (P < .01). There was no difference in sedative use between the 2 groups. CONCLUSIONS: This mobile application possibly had effectiveness in routine use for reducing anxiety and increasing patients' cooperation in bone marrow aspiration procedures.

Effects of massage therapy on pain and anxiety arising from intrathecal therapy or bone marrow aspiration in children with cancer.

Cancer and its treatment are stressful and reduce the quality of life in children. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of massage therapy on pain and anxiety arising from intrathecal therapy or bone marrow aspiration in children with cancer. We conducted a controlled pretest/posttest quasi-experimental study at a paediatric oncology unit in Turkey. Twenty-five children were enrolled in this study. Their pain and anxiety were determined using a visual analogue scale. When the pretest and posttest pain and anxiety levels of the groups were compared, no statistically significant difference was found (P > 0.05). It was determined that pain and anxiety levels in the experimental group decreased significantly. This study provides preliminary evidence for the effectiveness in children of massage in reducing pain and anxiety arising from intrathecal therapy or bone marrow aspiration.

Strategies of pain reduction during the bone marrow biopsy.

Examination of the bone marrow biopsy and aspirate allows diagnosis and assessment of various conditions such as primary hematologic and metastatic neoplasms, as well as nonmalignant disorders. Despite being performed for many years, according to many different protocols, the procedure still remains painful for the majority of patients. This paper summarizes the current knowledge of pain reduction measures in the bone marrow biopsy and aspiration.

A randomized trial of hypnosis for relief of pain and anxiety in adult cancer patients undergoing bone marrow procedures.

Pain and anxiety are closely associated with bone marrow aspirates and biopsies. To determine whether hypnosis administered concurrently with the procedure can ameliorate these morbidities, the authors randomly assigned 80 cancer patients undergoing bone marrow aspirates and biopsies to either hypnosis or standard of care. The hypnosis intervention reduced the anxiety associated with procedure, but the difference in pain scores between the two groups was not statistically significant. The authors conclude that brief hypnosis concurrently administered reduces patient anxiety during bone marrow aspirates and biopsies but may not adequately control pain. The authors explain this latter finding as indicating that the sensory component of a patient's pain experience may be of lesser importance than the affective component. The authors describe future studies to clarify their results and address the limitations of this study.

Effects of music therapy on pain and anxiety in patients undergoing bone marrow biopsy and aspiration.

Bone marrow biopsy and aspiration are commonly used for diagnosing, treating, and following up after treatment for blood disorders and solid tumors. For adults, the infiltration of local anesthesia at the biopsy site has been used as the principal form of analgesia for bone marrow biopsy and aspiration. Pain relief during these procedures is often incomplete, especially during aspiration of the bone marrow, and pain is likely to contribute to patient anxiety. Researchers at the Tabriz Hematology and Oncology Center in Iran conducted a study to quantify and evaluate the effectiveness of music therapy interventions on pain and anxiety control for 100 patients undergoing bone marrow biopsy and aspiration. Participants in the study were randomly assigned to one of two groups: one group listened to music during the procedure, and the other did not. Patients completed the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory both before and after the procedure and reported pain severity by using a visual analog scale. Results showed that participants who listened to music had lower state anxiety and pain levels than those who did not listen to music.

Compreendendo a experiência de crianças e adolescentes submetidos à punção de medula óssea e lombar em centro cirúrgico de um hospital oncológico / Understanding the experience of children and adolescents to undergo bone marrow aspiration and lumbar surgery center in a hospital cancer

Atualmente, o câncer infantil é bastante compreendido e estudado, apresentando altas probabilidades de cura, graças aos avanços da ciência e da tecnologia. Porém, quando este diagnóstico é dado a crianças ou adolescentes ele ainda gera desconfortos, devido ao impacto que esta doença pode causar no desenvolvimento destes indivíduos. Tanto a fase de diagnóstico, quanto as etapas do tratamento incluem a realização de procedimentos invasivos, bem como a utilização de drogas agressivas. O objetivo deste estudo foi compreender a experiência de crianças e adolescentes submetidos a procedimentos de punção de medula óssea e punção lombar realizadas em uma Unidade de Centro Cirúrgico de um Hospital Oncológico, sedadas antes da realização dos mesmos. Foi realizado um estudo qualitativo, utilizando-se o Discurso do Sujeito Coletivo (DSC) para a organização dos dados, e para análise dos resultados foi elaborado um Quadro Teórico. Foram entrevistados 15 sujeitos nos períodos pré e pós-procedimentos, na faixa etária de 7 a 14 anos de idade, procedentes de diversos Estados do Brasil. A maioria deles é do sexo masculino, com diagnóstico de Leucemia Linfoblástica Aguda (LLA). De acordo comos resultados foram construídos 18 DSC que revelaram, além de aspectos positivos quanto à importância da sedação antes da execução dos procedimentos, noções sobre o tratamento e a doença, assim como, satisfação pelo atendimento recebido, sentimentos como medo, ansiedade, devido ao tempo de espera na etapa do pré-procedimento e insegurança quanto à cura. Foram reveladas também dificuldades quanto à realização do tratamento, como a dependência de transporte público, da rotina hospitalar, a separação da família, a distância da escola e dos amigos. Oferecer uma assistência tecnicamente diferenciada ainda é insuficiente para minimizar as adversidades enfrentadas por estes indivíduos e suas famílias...

Attitudes of children with leukemia toward repeated deep sedations with propofol.

Procedural sedation is generally recommended for children requiring repeated painful diagnostic or therapeutic procedures. A child with leukemia undergoes an average of 20 procedures such as lumbar puncture and bone marrow aspiration through the course of illness. No data are currently available about the psychological impact of repeated sedations on children. The objective of this study was to evaluate the attitudes of patients with leukemia toward repeated deep sedations using propofol. A questionnaire addressing sedation-related distress was given to 30 children with leukemia. Procedure-related distress was evaluated using the Amended Observational Scale of Behavioural Distress. Another questionnaire concerning the same issues was given to an historical group of 39 children who had undergone painful procedures without sedation in previous years. Fear and distress were significantly reduced in the sedation group compared with the historical one. Fear of sedation was reported by 17% of children of this group. Distressed behavior was observed in 27%. In conclusion, sedation-related distress was observed in a subgroup of patients; in these cases, specific strategies could be considered to reduce sedation-related distress.

Propofol or propofol--alfentanil anesthesia for painful procedures in the pediatric oncology ward.

BACKGROUND: For children with cancer receiving curative treatment, the pain of diagnostic and therapeutic procedures is often worse than that of the disease itself. In order to evaluate if light propofol anesthesia in the pediatric oncology ward (POW) could improve the management of procedure pain and anxiety, a questionnaire was developed. METHODS: After prolonged EMLA application, 65 propofol anesthetics were performed successfully in 28 children during lumbar puncture and/or bone marrow aspiration in the POW, with short recovery time and without major adverse events. The questionnaire was mailed to the parents of the 28 children who were included in the survey. RESULTS: The return of questionnaire compliance was 89% (25 of 28), 12 females and 13 males, mean age was 7 years (range 2-16). Among those who replied, the diagnoses were acute lymphatic leukemia in 21, lymphoma in two and tumor in the other two. In the questionnaire, all parents/patients reported advantages with anesthesia in the POW compared with the operating room. In the list of stated advantages, 88% marked 'familiar nurses and doctors', 84% 'familiar environment', 80% 'closer to own room', 68% 'the child more calm', 72% 'shorter waiting-time', 60% 'faster recovery', 44% 'shorter fasting-time' and 44% 'parents more calm', as benefits. For future procedures requiring anesthesia to reduce pain, discomfort and/or anxiety, 92% of the parents/patients preferred anesthesia in the POW. CONCLUSIONS: If anesthesia is chosen for invasive procedures, this study suggest that propofol anesthesia in the POW is preferred by parents and children.

Painful procedures in pediatric cancer. A comparison of interventions.

Different interventions (i.e., cognitive-behavioral, pharmacological) and their combination were examined and compared to assist pediatric patients with cancer to manage distress during painful procedures. Findings revealed that cognitive protocols are effective in relieving procedural distress for a significant number of children. Pharmacological therapies were found to be relatively safe and effective when carefully administered and monitored by medical personnel. Data from combined cognitive therapies and pharmacological interventions, particularly those more recent pharmacological interventions, reveal generally mixed results, with both types of interventions yielding distinct benefits and disadvantages. Recommendations are made for future studies that match interventions to specific characteristics of the children for whom they are intended, as well as additional studies that combine pharmacological approaches together with cognitive techniques.

Prospective evaluation of propofol anesthesia in the pediatric intensive care unit for elective oncology procedures in ambulatory and hospitalized children.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate our experience with propofol anesthesia delivered by pediatric intensivists in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) to facilitate elective oncology procedures in children performed by pediatric oncologists. METHODS: Elective oncology procedures performed with propofol anesthesia in our multidisciplinary, university-affiliated PICU were prospectively evaluated over a 7-month period. Ambulatory and hospitalized children were prescheduled for their procedure, underwent a medical evaluation, and met fasting requirements before the start of anesthesia. Continuous cardiorespiratory and neurologic monitoring was performed by a pediatric intensivist and a PICU nurse, while the procedure was performed by a pediatric oncologist. Propofol was delivered in intermittent boluses to achieve the desired level of anesthesia. Information studied included patient demographics, procedures performed, induction and total doses of propofol used, the duration of the different phases of the patient's PICU stay, the occurrence of side effects, the need for therapeutic interventions, and the incidence of recall of the procedure. RESULTS: Fifty procedures in 28 children (mean age: 7.5 +/- 4.3 years) were evaluated. Sixty-one percent of patients had established diagnoses. Fifty-four percent of procedures were lumbar puncture with intrathecal chemotherapy administration and 26% of procedures were bone marrow aspirations with biopsy. Induction propofol doses were 2. 0 +/-.8 mg/kg for ambulatory and hospitalized patients, while total propofol doses were 6.6 +/- 2.3 mg/kg and 7.9 +/- 2.4 mg/kg for ambulatory and hospitalized patients, respectively. Induction time was 1.5 +/-.7 minutes, recovery time was 23.4 +/- 11.5 minutes, and total PICU time was 88.8 +/- 27.7 minutes. Transient decreases in systolic blood pressure less than the fifth percentile for age occurred in 64% of procedures, with a mean decrease of 25% +/- 10%. Intravenous fluids were administered in 31% of these cases. Hypotension was more common in ambulatory patients but was not predicted by propofol dose, anesthesia time, or age. Partial airway obstruction was noted in 12% of procedures while apnea requiring bag-valve-mask ventilation occurred in 2% of procedures. Neither was associated with age, propofol dose, or the duration of anesthesia. All procedures were successfully completed and there were no incidences of recall of the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Propofol anesthesia is effective in achieving patient comfort and amnesia, while optimizing conditions for elective oncology procedures in children. Although transient hypotension and respiratory depression may occur, propofol anesthesia seems to be safe to use for these procedures in the PICU setting. Recovery from anesthesia was rapid and total stay was brief. Under the proper conditions, propofol anesthesia delivered by pediatric intensivists in the PICU is a reasonable option available to facilitate invasive oncology procedures in children.

Parent coping and child distress behaviors during invasive procedures for childhood cancer.

This study examines what parents identified as their primary stressor before their child's invasive procedure, what coping strategies were used to manage the stress, what level of distress their children experienced during each phase of the procedure, and whether parents' coping modes were associated with their children's distress. Twenty children with cancer from 3 to 11 years of age and the parent present during the procedure participated in the study. Parents' primary stressors were identified as uncertainty about parent role and anticipating the child's distress during the procedure. Although parents used both emotion-focused and problem-focused strategies for coping with their primary stressors, they primarily relied on emotion-focused strategies. Children experienced the most behavioral distress during the procedural phase, and girls exhibited more distress than boys. The parents' coping modes were not associated with their children's distress, but children of parents whose primary stressor was uncertainty about parent role had higher distress than children of parents whose primary stressor was anticipating the child's distress. The findings related to parents' stressors, their coping strategies, and their children's distress were consistent with previous research. Directions for future research and suggestions for dealing with invasive procedures for childhood cancer are described.

Pharmacologic and psychologic interventions for procedural pain.

OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated a combined pharmacologic and psychologic intervention (combined intervention, CI) relative to a pharmacologic-only (PO) intervention in reducing child distress during invasive procedures in childhood leukemia. Predictors of child distress included age, group (CI, PO), and procedural variables (medications and doses, technical difficulty, number of needles required). METHODOLOGY: This was a randomized, controlled prospective study that compared the PO (n = 45) and CI arms (n = 47), at 1, 6, and >12 months after diagnosis. A cross-sectional control group consisted of parents of 70 patients in first remission before the prospective study. Parent questionnaires, staff and parent ratings, and data on medications administered, technical difficulty of the procedure, and needle insertions were obtained for each procedure. This article reports on the final data point for the project (>12 months). RESULTS: Mothers and nurses reported lower levels of child distress in the CI than the PO group. The CI and PO groups showed lower levels of child and parent distress than the cross-sectional control group. Distress decreased throughout the time, and child age was inversely related to distress (younger children had more distress) regardless of group. Child distress was associated with staff perceptions of the technical difficulty of the procedure and with child age, but not with medications administered. CONCLUSIONS: The data showed that pharmacologic and psychologic interventions for procedural distress were effective in reducing child and parent distress and support integration of the two approaches. Younger children experienced more distress and warranted additional consideration. Staff perceptions of the technical difficulty of procedures were complex and potentially helpful in designing intervention protocols.

The Perception of Procedures Questionnaire: psychometric properties of a brief parent report measure of procedural distress.

Reported the reliability and validity of the Perception of Procedures Questionnaire (PPQ), a 19-item parent-report measure developed to assess child and parent distress related to lumbar punctures and bone marrow aspirates in the diagnosis and treatment of childhood cancer. PPQ data from 140 mothers and 96 fathers of children and adolescents with leukemia in a first remission were analyzed separately. Factor analyses yielded five factors for mothers and fathers: Parent Satisfaction; Child Distress: During; Child Distress: Before; Parent Distress; and Parent Involvement. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was high for the total score and the five factor scores as were interrater reliabilities between mothers and fathers. Validity was determined using the Parenting Stress Index-Short Form, the Pediatric Oncology Quality of Life Scale, and parent and nurse ratings during procedures. Factors 2 and 3, assessing child distress, show strong associations with the validation measures and support the distinction between distress before and during procedures. This developing scale is recommended for use in the assessment and evaluation of child and parent procedure-related distress in pediatric oncology.

Physician and parent behavior during invasive pediatric cancer procedures: relationships to child behavioral distress.

Observed 51 children with cancer, their parents, and their physicians during routine bone marrow aspirations and lumbar punctures. Child distress was measured via the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress (OSBD); adult behaviors were coded via the Child Adult Medical Procedure Interaction Scale (CAMPIS). In general, physicians were less verbally interactive than parents both before and during the procedure. As expected, several parent behaviors were positively related to child distress. However, physician behaviors were uniformly negatively related to child distress. Findings are discussed in terms of the physician-patient relationship and the possible role of physicians as change agents in reducing child distress during invasive procedures.

Primary and secondary control among children undergoing medical procedures: adjustment as a function of coping style.

The literature suggests that optimal adjustment to relatively uncontrollable stressors may require adjusting oneself to the stressors rather than trying to alter them. This possibility was explored, for low-controllability stressors (e.g., painful medical procedures) associated with leukemia. Children's reports of coping strategies and goals were classified as primary control coping (attempts to alter objective conditions), secondary control coping (attempts to adjust oneself to objective conditions), or relinquished control (no attempt to cope). Secondary control coping was positively associated with (a) general behavioral adjustment assessed by the Child Behavior Checklist and (b) illness-specific adjustment assessed by children's own distress ratings and by behavioral observations during painful procedures. All significant group differences showed better adjustment among secondary control children than among the primary or relinquished groups.

Parenting and child distress during cancer procedures: a multidimensional assessment.

We examined the relationship between children's distress during invasive cancer procedures and parent anxiety, parent disciplinary attitudes, and parent behavior during the medical procedure. Sixty-six children with cancer and their parents were evaluated during a routine bone marrow aspiration. Significantly higher levels of distress were obtained for young (under age 8) versus older children. Patterns of relationships with parent variables also varied by age. Anxious parents of young children reported relying on less effective discipline strategies. They also were less reassuring prior to to medical procedure. Age differences in the correlations between child distress and parenting are discussed in terms of developmental differences in children's dependence on caregivers for emotional regulation and control. Implications for clinical distress reduction programs are also discussed.