Comparative adherence of macitentan versus ambrisentan and bosentan in Australian patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: a retrospective real-world database study.

AIM: Bosentan, ambrisentan, and macitentan are endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs), currently available in Australia for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This study assessed the comparative adherence of these ERAs for PAH in Australian patients. METHODS: This retrospective, observational study used data for adults with PAH from the Services Australia 10% Pharmaceuticals Benefits Scheme (PBS) dataset (01/2006-10/2020). The primary outcome was treatment adherence (i.e. receiving ≥80% of ERA doses over 12 months). Secondary outcomes were time to treatment change (add-on or switch) and overall survival. RESULTS: The study included 436 patients who took bosentan (n = 200), ambrisentan (n = 69), or macitentan (n = 167). Treatment adherence was significantly greater in patients who received macitentan (65.3%) versus ambrisentan (56.5%) and bosentan (58.0%), with odds ratios (ORs; 95% CI) of 0.51 (0.30-0.88; p = 0.016) for bosentan versus macitentan and 0.48 (0.24-0.96; p = 0.037) for ambrisentan versus macitentan. The median time to treatment change was 47.2 and 43.4 months for bosentan and ambrisentan, respectively (not calculated for macitentan because of insufficient duration of data). LIMITATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS: Real-world data for Australian patients with PAH showed that treatment adherence for ERAs was suboptimal. Adherence was higher for macitentan compared with ambrisentan and bosentan.

Clinical course of COPD patients with exercise-induced elevation of pulmonary artery pressure or less severe pulmonary hypertension presenting with respiratory symptoms and the impact of bosentan intervention-prospective, single-center, randomized, parallel-group study.

BACKGROUND: The data on bosentan were lacking for the treatment of exercise-induced elevation of pulmonary artery pressure (eePAP) or less severe PH in COPD. This study was conducted to investigate long-term efficacy and safety of bosentan for the treatment of eePAP or less severe PH in COPD. METHODS: COPD patients diagnosed at this hospital as having COPD (WHO functional class II, III or IV) with eePAP or less severe PH whose respiratory symptoms were stable but remained and gradually progressed even after COPD therapy were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either bosentan or no PH treatment for two years and assessed at baseline and every 6 months for respiratory failure, activities of daily living (ADL), lung and heart functions by right heart catheterization (RHC), and other parameters. RESULTS: A total of 29 patients who underwent RHC for detail examination were enrolled in the current study between August 2010 and October 2018.No death occurred in drug-treated group (n = 14) for 2 years; 5 patients died in untreated group (n = 15). Significant differences were noted between the 2 group in hospital-free survival (686.00 ± 55.87 days vs. 499.94 ± 53.27 days; hazard ratio [HR], 0.18; P = 0.026) and overall survival (727 days vs. 516.36 ± 55.38 days; HR, 0.095; P = 0.030) in all causes of death analysis, but not in overall survival in analysis of respiratory-related death. Bosentan was not associated with increased adverse events including requiring O2 inhalation. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggested that the prognosis for COPD patients with eePAP or less severe PH presenting with respiratory symptoms was very poor and that bosentan tended to improve their prognosis and suppress ADL deterioration without worsening respiratory failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This study was registered with UMIN-CTR Clinical Trial as UMIN000004749 . First trial registration at 18/12/2010.

Bosentan and ambrisentan in the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to showcase the effectiveness and safety of bosentan or ambrisentan in individuals diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and offer fresh evidence for the management of this condition. MATERIALS AND METHODS: For this research, we conducted a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials by searching various databases, including the Cochrane Library, Excerpta Medica Database, PubMed, and Web of Science. The retrieval was conducted until November 2021. We analyzed the variances in 6-minute walk distance (6MWD), death, diffusion capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), forced vital capacity (FVC), hospitalization, IPF worsening, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, serious adverse events (SAEs), Short Form-36 improved, and St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire between the treatment and control groups. RESULTS: A sum of six studies involving 1,928 participants were found to meet the inclusion criteria. The quality of evidence was high. The control group had significantly higher values for 6MWD, DLCO, and FVC compared to the ambrisentan treatment group. The rates of hospitalization and IPF worsening were considerably greater in comparison with the control group. The bosentan group exhibited significantly reduced rates of hospitalization and IPF worsening in comparison with the control group. Both drugs did not cause any raising in death or SAEs when in comparison with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this research validate the effectiveness and safety of bosentan for treating IPF patients. This medication can enhance the quality of life for individuals with IPF without causing any significant increase in SAEs. However, it does not have a notable influence on the long-term prognosis. The findings of this research do not endorse the utilization of ambrisentan in individuals diagnosed with IPF.

Bosentan Does Not Affect Renal Resistive Index in Scleroderma/Systemic Sclerosis Patients.

INTRODUCTION: If properly evaluated, chronic kidney disease can be found in up to 50% of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). The renal resistive index (RRI) is a marker of intrarenal vascular resistance and can predict SSc-associated vasculopathy. This study aimed to determine the impact of bosentan, a nonselective endothelin-1 receptor antagonist, on RRI and kidney function in SSc patients with recurrent digital ulcers. METHODS: Twenty-one patients (age 57 ± 9 years, 19 females) were recruited in a 16-week prospective open-label uncontrolled study. Standardized procedures were used to measure general clinical and laboratory characteristics, systolic, diastolic, and mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulse pressure (PP), diastolic to systolic blood pressure (D/S) ratio, and urinary endothelin-1 levels. The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation was used to calculate kidney function as an estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR). RRI was measured by Doppler ultrasound as the average of three samplings of intrarenal blood flow in different kidney regions of both kidneys. Patients with secondary causes of kidney disease or kidney diseases associated with albuminuria were excluded. RESULTS: Bosentan treatment for 16 weeks did not change RRI (0.731 ± 0.049-0.730 ± 0.054, p = 0.925), but increased urine endothelin-1 to creatinine ratio (0.27 ± 0.15-0.49 ± 0.57 pg/mg, p = 0.032) and reduced MAP (123 ± 10-101 ± 11 mm Hg, p < 0.001), PP (76 ± 11-68 ± 10 mm Hg, p = 0.003), D/S ratio (0.563 ± 0.044-0.538 ± 0.031, p = 0.006), and eGFR (92 ± 20-84 ± 24 mL/min/1.73 m2, p = 0.003). DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: In conclusion, in patients with SSc complicated by digital ulcers and normal to mildly diminished kidney function, bosentan had no effect on intrarenal hemodynamics, but reduced blood pressure levels and kidney function.

Systemic pharmacological treatment of digital ulcers in systemic sclerosis: a systematic literature review.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the evidence concerning systemic pharmacological treatments for SSc digital ulcers (DUs) to inform the development of evidence-based treatment guidelines. METHODS: A systematic literature review of seven databases was performed to identify all original research studies of adult patients with SSc DUs. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective longitudinal observational studies (OBSs) were eligible for inclusion. Data were extracted, applying the patient, intervention, comparison, outcome framework, and risk of bias (RoB) was assessed. Due to study heterogeneity, narrative summaries were used to present data. RESULTS: Forty-seven studies that evaluated the treatment efficacy or safety of pharmacological therapies were identified among 4250 references. Data from 18 RCTs of 1927 patients and 29 OBSs of 661 patients, at various RoB (total 2588 patients) showed that i.v. iloprost, phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors and atorvastatin are effective for the treatment of active DUs. Bosentan reduced the rate of future DUs in two RCTs (moderate RoB) and eight OBSs at low to high RoB. Two small studies (moderate RoB) indicate that Janus kinase inhibitors may be effective for the treatment of active DUs, otherwise there are no data to support the use of immunosuppression or anti-platelet agents in the management of DUs. CONCLUSION: There are several systemic treatments, across four medication classes, that are effective therapies for the management of SSc DUs. However, a lack of robust data means it is not possible to define the optimal treatment regimen for SSc DUs. The relatively low quality of evidence available has highlighted further areas of research need.

Prescribing of endothelin receptor antagonists and riociguat in women of childbearing age in a large German claims database study.

Use of endothelin receptor antagonists (ERAs) and riociguat, approved for treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH), is contraindicated during pregnancy due to reported teratogenicity in animals. We aimed to investigate prescribing of these drugs in girls/women of childbearing age and to explore - as a secondary aim - the occurrence of pregnancies exposed to these drugs. Using the German Pharmacoepidemiological Research Database (GePaRD, claims data from 20% of the German population) we conducted cross-sectional analyses to determine prescribing prevalence of ERAs and riociguat between 2004 and 2019 and to characterize users and prescribing patterns. In a cohort analysis, we assessed the occurrence of pregnancies exposed to these drugs in the critical time window. Overall, we identified 407 women with ≥ 1 dispensation of bosentan between 2004 and 2019; the respective number was 73 for ambrisentan, 182 for macitentan, 31 for sitaxentan, and 63 for riociguat. In nearly all years, more than 50% of the girls/women were ≤ 40 years. Age-standardized prevalence was highest for bosentan (0.04/1000) in 2012 and 2013, followed by macitentan (0.03/1000) in 2018 and 2019. We observed 10 exposed pregnancies: 5 to bosentan, 3 to ambrisentan, and 2 to macitentan. The increased prevalence of macitentan and riociguat from 2014 onwards might reflect changes in PH treatment. Even though PH is a rare disease and pregnancy should be avoided in women with PH, particularly if they use ERAs, we identified pregnancies exposed to ERAs. Multi-database studies will be needed to assess the risk of these drugs on the unborn child.

Endothelial cell-derived MMP19 promotes pulmonary fibrosis by inducing E(nd)MT and monocyte infiltration.

BACKGROUND: Matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs) play important roles in remodeling the extracellular matrix and in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF). MMP19, which is an MMP, was significantly upregulated in hyperplastic alveolar epithelial cells in IPF lung tissues and promoted epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). Recent studies have demonstrated that endothelial-to-mesenchymal transition (E(nd)MT) contributes to pulmonary fibrosis. However, the role of MMP19 in pulmonary vascular injury and repair and E(nd)MT remains unclear. METHODS: To determine the role of MMP19 in E(nd)MT and pulmonary fibrosis. MMP19 expressions were determined in the lung endothelial cells of IPF patients and bleomycin (BLM)-induced mice. The roles of MMP19 in E(nd)MT and endothelial barrier permeability were studied in the MMP19 cDNA-transfected primary human pulmonary microvascular endothelial cells (HPMECs) and MMP19 adenoassociated virus (MMP19-AAV)-infected mice. The regulatory mechanism of MMP19 in pulmonary fibrosis was elucidated by blocking its interacting proteins SDF1 and ET1 with AMD3100 and Bosentan, respectively. RESULTS: In this study, we found that MMP19 expression was significantly increased in the lung endothelial cells of IPF patients and BLM-induced mice compared to the control groups. MMP19 promoted E(nd)MT and the migration and permeability of HPMECs in vitro, stimulated monocyte infiltration into the alveolus, and aggravated BLM-induced pulmonary fibrosis in vivo. SDF1 and Endothelin-1 (ET1) were physically associated with MMP19 in HPMECs and colocalized with MMP19 in endothelial cells in IPF patient lung tissues. AMD3100 and bosentan alleviated the fibrosis induced by MMP19 in the BLM mouse model. CONCLUSION: MMP19 promoted E(nd)MT by interacting with ET1 and stimulated monocyte infiltration into lung tissues via the SDF1/CXCR4 axis, thus aggravating BLM-induced pulmonary fibrosis. Vascular integrity regulated by MMP19 could be a promising therapeutic target for suppressing pulmonary fibrosis. Video abstract.

Pulmonary vasodilator therapies in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with CHD: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

The optimal treatment strategy using pulmonary vasodilators in pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with CHD (PAH-CHD) remains controversial. We aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of pulmonary vasodilators in PAH-CHD. PubMed and EMBASE databases were searched through May 2022 and a network meta-analysis was conducted. The primary outcomes were mean difference of changes in 6-minute walk distance, NYHA functional class, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide. The secondary outcomes included pulmonary vascular resistance, mean pulmonary arterial pressure, and resting oxygen saturation. We identified 14 studies, yielding 807 patients with PAH-CHD. Bosentan and sildenafil were associated with a significant increase in 6-minute walk distance from baseline compared with placebo (MD 48.92 m, 95% CI 0.32 to 97.55 and MD 59.70 m, 95% CI 0.88 to 118.53, respectively). Bosentan, sildenafil, and combination of bosentan and sildenafil were associated with significant improvement in NYHA functional class compared with placebo (MD -0.33, 95% CI -0.51 to -0.14, MD -0.58, 95% CI -0.75 to -0.22 and MD -0.62, 95% CI -0.92 to -0.31, respectively). Bosentan and sildenafil were also associated with significant improvements in secondary outcomes. These findings were largely confirmed in the subgroup analysis. Various adverse events were reported; however, serious adverse event rates were relatively low (4.8-8.7%), including right heart failure, acute kidney injury, respiratory failure, hypotension, and discontinuation of pulmonary vasodilators. In conclusion, bosentan and sildenafil were the most effective in improving prognostic risk factor such as 6-minute walk distance and NYHA class. Overall, pulmonary vasodilators were well tolerated in PAH-CHD.

Real-world effectiveness and safety of bosentan in Japanese patients with systemic sclerosis: A single-center retrospective study.

Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) develop various vascular disorders, including digital ulcers (DUs), which are sometimes intractable. Bosentan is a dual endothelin receptor antagonist expected to suppress the development of new DUs. The objective of this study was to analyze retrospectively Japanese SSc patients treated with bosentan and investigate its efficacy and safety. We analyzed 40 patients who visited our department from 2009 to 2022 and were treated with bosentan. Of the 25 patients who were able to continue bosentan, 64% (16 patients) were cured by 16 weeks . New DUs occurred in 5.9% (2/34) of patients and the number of new DUs per person was 0.1. Adverse events occurred in 45% (18/40), and hepatic dysfunction was occurred most frequently at 32.5% (13/40). In univariate analysis, hepatic dysfunction was significantly high in patients with low modified Rodnan total skin thickness score. Antimitochondria-antibody-positive patients were more likely to develop liver dysfunction. Hepatic dysfunction was improved without the reduction or discontinuation, dose reduction, discontinuation, or concomitant use of ursodeoxycholic acid. These results suggest that bosentan can be selected as an additional treatment for DU, which is difficult to treat with existing therapies, while carefully monitoring hepatic function.

Pharmacological counseling in hepatotoxicity induced by macitentan and selexipag: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a progressive, debilitating condition characterized by increased resistance in the pulmonary arterial circulation. Current treatments for pulmonary arterial hypertension include endothelin receptor antagonists such as bosentan, sitaxentan, ambrisentan, macitentan, and oral prostacyclin receptor agonists such as selexipag. Endothelin receptor antagonists have been associated with liver injury, while hepatotoxicity was not reported for selexipag. Although genetic variability has been indisputably associated with variability in drug response, no study has been designed until now to assess its effects on the pharmacokinetics of endothelin receptor antagonists or selexipag. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 58-year-old female Caucasian patient with a dramatic increase in plasma levels of transaminases after treatment with macitentan and selexipag, drugs whose risk of causing liver injury has so far been considered limited. After therapy discontinuation, plasma levels of transaminases returned to baseline, thus suggesting a role of these drugs in the observed hepatotoxicity. After pharmacological counseling, we decided to introduce ambrisentan for the patient's treatment. After 7 months of treatment, no liver injury has been reported. To evaluate the role of genetic factors in the observed hepatotoxicity, we genotyped the patient for single-nucleotide polymorphisms previously associated with macitentan, ambrisentan, or selexipag metabolism. We found a genetic profile associated with a poor metabolizer (PM) phenotype for CYP2C8 and CYP2C9, key enzymes for elimination of both macitentan and selexipag. The reported results suggest that an allelic profile associated with low activity for CYP2C8 and CYP2C9 enzyme could be a potential risk factor for macitentan and selexipag-induced liver injury and could provide a possible marker for early identification of subjects at higher risk of developing hepatotoxicity. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary approach based on clinical evaluation, as well as pharmacological counseling and evaluation of the patient's genetic profile, might be useful for identification of patients with a high chance of drug-induced liver injury, avoiding unnecessary risks in therapy selection and prescription.

Drug-Drug Interactions in the Management of Patients With Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension.

The management of pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) has become more complex in recent years because of increased pharmacotherapy options and longer patient survival with increasing numbers of comorbidities. As such, more opportunities exist for drug-drug interactions between PAH-targeted medications and medications potentially used to treat comorbid conditions. In this review, we provide an overview of pharmaceutical metabolism by cytochrome P450 and discuss important drug-drug interactions for the 14 Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for PAH in the nitric oxide (NO), endothelin, and prostacyclin pathways. Among the targets in the NO pathway (sildenafil, tadalafil, and riociguat), important interactions with nitrates, protease inhibitors, and other phosphodiesterase inhibitors can cause profound hypotension. In the endothelin pathway, bosentan is associated with more drug interactions via CYP3A4 inhibition; macitentan and ambrisentan have fewer interactions of note. Although the parenteral therapies in the prostacyclin pathway bypass significant liver metabolism and avoid drug interactions, selexipag and oral treprostinil may exhibit interactions with CYP2C8 inhibitors such as gemfibrozil and clopidogrel, which can raise drug levels. Finally, we provide a framework for identifying potential drug-drug interactions and avoiding errors.

Ambrisentana, bosentana, iloprosta, selexipague e sildenafila para o tratamento de pacientes com hipertensão arterial pulmonar / Ambrisentan, bosentan, iloprost, selexipag and sildenafil for the treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension

INTRODUÇÃO: A Hipertensão Arterial Pulmonar (HAP) é uma doença grave e progressiva que resulta em disfunção ventricular direita e comprometimento na tolerância à atividade física, podendo levar à insuficiência cardíaca direita, incapacidade e morte prematura. Possui incidência estimada de 1,9 a 3,7 novos casos/milhão de habitantes ao ano. Atualmente, são disponíveis cinco medicamentos aprovados pela Anvisa e incorporados no Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS), que incluem antagonistas do receptor de endotelina (ERA) (ambrisentana e bosentana); inibidores da fosfodiesterase 5 (PDE5i) (sildenafila) e atuantes na via da prostaciclina (PGI2), que são os análogos da PGI2 (iloprosta). O atual Protocolo Clínico e Diretrizes Terapêuticas da Hipertensão Arterial Pulmonar informa que a avaliação da Conitec foi contrária à utilização destes fármacos em terapia combinada, por falta de estudos comprobatórios de eficácia e pelos riscos de eventos adversos potencialmente graves ainda não avaliados adequadamente. A indicação de incorporação é a terapia combinada destes medicamentos e sildenafila em alta dose, como alternativas complementares de tratamento. Assim o objetivo deste relatório foi analisar as evidências científicas disponíveis sobre eficácia, efetividade, segurança, custoefetividade e impacto orçamentário do ambris

Pharmacology Management in Improving Exercise Capacity of Patients with Fontan Circulation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The Fontan procedure is currently the mainstay therapy for single functional ventricles. However, with prolonged follow-up duration, various complications have been observed that seriously influence the quality of life of patients. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this meta-analysis is to compare the effectiveness of pharmacologic agents in improving exercise capacity in patients with Fontan circulation. METHODS: This meta-analysis was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement and has been registered in the International Prospective Register for Systematic Reviews database with registration no. 282352. Quality assessments of the included studies were assessed using the Strengthening Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement. RESULTS: Twelve studies met the predetermined inclusion criteria and were included in this metaanalysis. This meta-analysis found that treatment with bosentan significantly improved New York Heart Association Functional Class (NYHA FC) in Fontan patients (standard mean difference - 0.59, 95% CI -0.94 - -0.25; P=0.0008; I2 = 1%). However, the use of bosentan (P=0.66) and sildenafil (P=0.13) did not show a significant improvement in the maximum rate of oxygen consumption (VO2 max). CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis shows that people with Fontan circulation may benefit from using bosentan as it decreases postexercise heart rate and improves NYHA FC and 6-minute walking test results. Therefore, indirectly improving exercise capacity. Nonetheless, considerable work is required to strengthen our knowledge in improving the exercise capacity of Fontan patients.

Efficacy and safety of bosentan in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn: a Metaanalysis. / æ³¢ç”Ÿå¦æ²»ç–—æ–°ç”Ÿå„¿æŒç»­æ€§è‚ºåŠ¨è„‰é«˜åŽ‹æœ‰æ•ˆæ€§åŠå®‰å ¨æ€§çš„Meta分析.

OBJECTIVES: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of bosentan in the treatment of persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN). METHODS: Chinese Journal Full-text Database, Weipu Database, Wanfang Data, China Biology Medicine disc, PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane Library were searched for literature on bosentan in the treatment of PPHN published up to August 31, 2021. RESULTS: A total of 8 randomized controlled trials were included for Meta analysis. The results of the Meta analysis showed that compared with the control group, the bosentan treatment group had a significantly lower treatment failure rate (RR=0.23, P<0.001), a significantly greater reduction in pulmonary artery pressure [mean difference (MD)=-11.79, P<0.001)], significantly greater increases in oxygen partial pressure (MD=10.21, P=0.006) and blood oxygen saturation (MD=8.30, P<0.001), and a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (MD=-1.35, P<0.001). The descriptive analysis showed that the bosentan treatment group had a lower degree of tricuspid regurgitation than the control group after treatment. The main adverse reactions of bosentan treatment included abnormal liver function, anemia and edema. The results of subgroup analysis based on treatment regimen, research area, and drug dose were consistent with those before stratification. CONCLUSIONS: Bosentan is effective in the treatment of PPHN. However, when using bosentan, attention should be paid to adverse reactions such as abnormal liver function.

DL0805-1, a novel Rho-kinase inhibitor, attenuates lung injury and vasculopathy in a rat model of monocrotaline-induced pulmonary hypertension.

Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a severe chronic cardiopulmonary dysfunction characterized by impaired of pulmonary circulation. Current therapeutic drugs mainly act as vasodilators, leading to an unsatisfactory prognosis. The Rho/ROCK pathway plays an important role in the cardiovascular system. DL0805-1, a novel Rho kinase inhibitor, synthesized by our institute and showed a protective effect on lung tissues and reduced right ventricular systolic pressure in a hypertensive crisis rat model in our previous study. The present study aims to explore the efficacy of DL0805-1 on PH. The classical PH rat model induced by a single subcutaneous injection of monocrotaline was used to investigate the therapeutic effect of DL0805-1 on PH and the underlying mechanisms. The results showed that the high dose of DL0805-1 had a better effect on the survival rate and controlled right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) of PH rats than fasudil. DL0805-1 also exhibited a superior lung protective effect and significantly improved pulmonary vascular function compared with bosentan. Regarding molecular mechanisms, DL0805-1 inhibited the ROCK pathway in both pulmonary arteries and lung tissues. Taken together, DL0805-1 alleviated lung injury and vasculopathy in experimental PH rats. DL0805-1 has the potential to be developed as a candidate drug for the treatment of PH.

A pilot study into bosentan (Tracleer®) as an immunomodulating agent in patients with Behçet's disease.

BACKGROUND: Behçet's disease (BD) is an auto-inflammatory vasculitis characterized by aphthous oro-genital ulcers, inflammatory skin changes and uveitis. Treatment is mainly immunosuppressive. Interestingly, elevated endotheline-1 (ET-1) levels suggest a possible beneficial effect of treatment with an ET-1 receptor antagonist. OBJECTIVE: The aim of our study was to investigate the possible beneficial effect of the ET-1 inhibitor bosentan. METHODS: We performed a prospective double-blind placebo controlled pilot study into the effect and safety of bosentan in BD patients. Disease activity was measured using the Behçet Disease Current Activity Form. The primary objective of the study was to determine whether bosentan is therapeutically effective in patients with BD. Secondary endpoints were safety, tapering of medication and the effect of bosentan on possible disease activity markers such as ET-1, circulating endothelial cells (CECs), soluble interleukin-2 receptor (sIL2R) and cytokine levels. RESULTS: Ten patients were randomized to either bosentan or placebo. Overall, no effect on disease activity was observed, although one patient responded clinically and continued treatment after the study period. Despite one SAE, bosentan seems safe to use. No effect on tapering of medication, CECs, sIL2R and cytokine levels was found. In the bosentan group, ET-1 levels were elevated during the treatment period, with no correlation with disease activity. CONCLUSIONS: Although this is a small pilot study, bosentan appears to be safe in BD patients. One patient had a durable and significant clinical response. Our observations should be confirmed and extended in a larger patient cohort to be of significant impact in the treatment options for BD.

Nonsurgical treatment of cerebral ischemia associated with ACTA2 cerebral arteriopathy: a case report and literature review.

Mutations in ACTA2 gene can lead to multisystemic smooth muscle dysfunction, including cerebrovascular disease. Treatment strategies for this rare entity remain controversial, and patients are at increasing risk of neurological sequelae. We herein present the case of an 11-year-old boy previously diagnosed with an ACTA2 gene mutation who developed repetitive transient ischemic attacks and treated with bosentan, an oral endothelin receptor antagonist. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed bilateral, periventricular white matter T2 hyperintensities, and magnetic resonance angiography identified several abnormalities including fusiform dilatation in the proximal segments of internal cerebral arteries, together with followed by terminal segmental stenosis. The distal branches showed a markedly straightened course with no increase in lenticulostriate collaterals. Magnetic resonance imaging also revealed an increase in the number and size of large periventricular white matter lesions located in the left frontal lobe with the progression of ischemic symptoms. Instead of revascularization surgery, the administration of bosentan was started due to the high risk of perioperative ischemic sequelae. After bosentan initiation, the patient's repetitive episodes of cerebral ischemia ceased, and there has been no increase in the number of white matter lesions for 7 years. Bosentan might be beneficial for treating cerebral ischemia associated with ACTA2 cerebral arteriopathy by maintaining the dilatation of stenotic vessels and adequate systemic blood flow and should be considered before performing revascularization surgery.

Comparative assessment of efficacy and safety of ambrisentan and bosentan in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension: A meta-analysis.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Two endothelin receptor antagonists, ambrisentan and bosentan, have been demonstrated to be effective individually compared with placebo in the treatment of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). This network meta-analysis compared the efficacy and safety of ambrisentan and bosentan in patients with PAH. METHODS: Clinical trials were identified from the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL/CCTR), EMBASE and PubMed databases. Weighted mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated for continuous outcomes (6-min walk distance [6MWD] and Borg dyspnoea index [BDI]). Hazard ratio (HR) was calculated for binary outcomes, including clinical worsening, discontinuation due to adverse events (AEs) and liver dysfunction. Surface under cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) was used to rank the treatments in each index. RESULTS: Five clinical trials from four published studies (total patients: n = 920) were included. Ambrisentan and bosentan showed no significant difference in 6MWD (MD: -1.32; 95% CI: -27.87, 25.31, SUCRA score: ambrisentan 0.73, bosentan 0.77), BDI (MD: -0.16; 95% CI: -0.98, 0.65, SUCRA score: ambrisentan 0.83, bosentan 0.66), clinical worsening (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.33, 2.94, SUCRA score: ambrisentan 0.75, bosentan 0.74) and discontinuation due to AEs (HR: 0.84; 95% CI: 0.11, 5.86, SUCRA score: ambrisentan 0.47, bosentan 0.57). However, ambrisentan was significantly better than bosentan with respect to abnormal liver function (HR: 23.18; 95% CI: 2.24, 377.20, SUCRA score: ambrisentan 0.99, bosentan 0.02). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: The results of this network meta-analysis suggest that ambrisentan was similar to bosentan in efficacy, while it exhibited better tolerability with respect to abnormal liver function in comparison with bosentan, in patients with PAH.

Effectiveness of oral sildenafil for neonates with persistent pulmonary hypertension of newborn (PPHN): a prospective study in a tertiary care hospital.

INTRODUCTION: The prevalence of persistent pulmonary hypertension of newborn (PPHN) has been estimated 1.9/1000 live births. Although the efficacy of inhaled nitric oxide and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in PPHN is well established but it is difficult to administer and monitor in resource limited countries. Owing to this, other treatment options need to be evaluated. METHOD: This is a prospective observational study conducted in the Pediatric Cardiology Department, NICVD, Karachi, from February 2020 to October 2020 after the approval from the Institutional Ethical Review Committee. All the neonates referred to our Unit were screened by echocardiography (echo) and those who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included. Echo were done before starting sildenafil and after 72 h to assess the pressure gradient across tricuspid valve and right to left or bidirectional shunt across patent ductus arteriosus , patent foramen ovale , or both. Sildenafil was started with a dose of 1 mg/kg/dose thrice a day and increased to 2 mg/kg/dose after 48 h if partial pressure of oxygen (PO1] did not increase. In neonates who did not respond to increased dose of Sildenafil were added on oral Bosentan 1 mg/kg/dose twice a day. RESULTS: Total 82 newborns were enrolled. Fifty-two patients improved after 48 h so were continued on same treatment. Sildenafil dose was increased in 30 (37.9%) patients whose PO2 did not increase to at least 10% from baseline after 48 h of starting treatment. Three patients expired within 48-72 h. Out of 27 remaining patients, only four responded whereas 23 patients did not show any improvement. In these patients, Bosentan was supplemented along with sildenafil. CONCLUSION: The results of our study show effectiveness of oral Sildenafil in treating PPHN. The overall improvement observed in the patients was overwhelming. Combination of Sildenafil with Bosentan is beneficial in patients who did not respond on Sildenafil alone.