Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 2.175
1.
Ther Adv Respir Dis ; 18: 17534666241232264, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698565

What is this summary about?This summary describes the results of a clinical study called MANDALA that was published in the New England Journal of Medicine in 2022. In the MANDALA study, researchers looked at a new asthma rescue inhaler that contains both albuterol and budesonide in a single inhaler (known as albuterol-budesonide, AIRSUPRA™). This summary describes the results for people aged 18 yearsand older who took part in the study.


Albuterol , Asthma , Bronchodilator Agents , Budesonide , Drug Combinations , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Humans , Asthma/drug therapy , Albuterol/administration & dosage , Administration, Inhalation , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Adult , Middle Aged , Male , Female , Treatment Outcome , Adolescent , Young Adult , Aged , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage
2.
BMC Anesthesiol ; 24(1): 164, 2024 May 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693477

BACKGROUND: Post-operative sore throat (POST) has an incidence ranging from 21 to 80%. To prevent the development of POST, several pharmacological measures have been tried. Aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of preoperative zinc, magnesium and budesonide gargles in reducing the incidence and severity of POST in patients who underwent endotracheal intubation for elective surgeries. METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled equivalence trial in 180 patients admitted for elective surgical procedures under general anaesthesia. Patients were randomised into three groups; group Z received 40 mg Zinc, group M received 250 mg Magnesium Sulphate and group B received 200 µg Budesonide in the form of 30 ml tasteless and colourless gargle solutions. Sore throat assessment and haemodynamic recording was done postoperatively at immediate recovery (0 h) and 2, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24 h post-operatively. POST was graded on a four-point scale (0-3). RESULTS: POST score was comparable at all recorded time points i.e. 0,2,4,6,8,12 and 24 h. Maximum incidence was seen at 8 h in group B (33.3%) and the minimum incidence was at 24 h in group Z (10%) (p > 0.05). It was found that the incidence of POST was more in the surgeries lasting longer than 2 h in all groups. This difference was found to be statistically significant in Groups M and B. The incidence of POST was found to be comparable between laparoscopic and open procedures. CONCLUSION: Magnesium, zinc and budesonide have an equivocal effect in the prevention of POST at different time points. The incidence of sore throat increases significantly in surgeries lasting more than two hours if magnesium or budesonide have been used as premedicant. Duration of surgery is an independent predictor for POST. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2021/05/033741 Date-24/05/2021(Clinical Trial Registry of India).


Budesonide , Magnesium Sulfate , Pharyngitis , Postoperative Complications , Preoperative Care , Zinc , Humans , Pharyngitis/prevention & control , Pharyngitis/etiology , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Budesonide/therapeutic use , Double-Blind Method , Female , Male , Prospective Studies , Adult , Postoperative Complications/prevention & control , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Preoperative Care/methods , Zinc/administration & dosage , Middle Aged , Magnesium Sulfate/administration & dosage , Intubation, Intratracheal , Magnesium/administration & dosage , Incidence , Elective Surgical Procedures , Young Adult , Anesthesia, General/methods
3.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med ; 37(1): 2337708, 2024 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38735865

BACKGROUND: Presently, the efficacy of neonatal resuscitation techniques via interventions such as oral, nasal, and endotracheal suction for preventing meconium aspiration syndrome (MAS) after delivery has not been satisfactory. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the role of intratracheal instillation of budesonide on oxidative stress in MAS. METHODS: Sixty-two neonates with MAS admitted to Huai'an Maternity and Child Healthcare Hospital from January 2018 to June 2020 were divided into a study group (intratracheal instillation of 2 ml budesonide suspension; n = 31) and a control group (intratracheal instillation of 2 ml normal saline; n = 31). Collect data from two groups of patients and evaluate clinical outcomes, including oxygenation index (OI), as well as serum total oxidant status (TOS), total antioxidant capacity (TAC), oxidative stress index (OSI) and 8-Isoprostane before treatment and 72h after admission. RESULTS: We found no statistical differences in mortality, complication rate, total oxygen inhalation time, OI before treatment and 72h after admission between the two groups of neonates with MAS, while the duration of invasive respiratory support in the study group was significantly shorter than in the control group. Also, serum TAC, TOS, OSI and 8-isoprostane levels were not statistically different before treatment between the two groups. After 72h of admission, OSI and 8-Isoprostane in neonates with MAS in the study group were much lower than those in the control group. TOS, OSI, 8-Isoprostane in the control group and 8-Isoprostane in the study group were significantly higher than those before treatment. As for TAC and TOS, no significant differences were observed between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Intratracheal instillation of budesonide was shown to alleviate oxidative stress and shorten invasive ventilation time in neonates with MAS.


Budesonide , Dinoprost/analogs & derivatives , Meconium Aspiration Syndrome , Oxidative Stress , Humans , Meconium Aspiration Syndrome/drug therapy , Infant, Newborn , Oxidative Stress/drug effects , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Female , Male , Saline Solution/administration & dosage , Instillation, Drug , Case-Control Studies
4.
JAMA ; 331(10): 866-877, 2024 03 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38470381

Importance: Allergic rhinitis affects an estimated 15% of the US population (approximately 50 million individuals) and is associated with the presence of asthma, eczema, chronic or recurrent sinusitis, cough, and both tension and migraine headaches. Observations: Allergic rhinitis occurs when disruption of the epithelial barrier allows allergens to penetrate the mucosal epithelium of nasal passages, inducing a T-helper type 2 inflammatory response and production of allergen-specific IgE. Allergic rhinitis typically presents with symptoms of nasal congestion, rhinorrhea, postnasal drainage, sneezing, and itching of the eyes, nose, and throat. In an international study, the most common symptoms of allergic rhinitis were rhinorrhea (90.38%) and nasal congestion (94.23%). Patients with nonallergic rhinitis present primarily with nasal congestion and postnasal drainage frequently associated with sinus pressure, ear plugging, muffled sounds and pain, and eustachian tube dysfunction that is less responsive to nasal corticosteroids. Patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis typically have physical examination findings of edematous and pale turbinates. Patients with perennial allergic rhinitis typically have erythematous and inflamed turbinates with serous secretions that appear similar to other forms of chronic rhinitis at physical examination. Patients with nonallergic rhinitis have negative test results for specific IgE aeroallergens. Intermittent allergic rhinitis is defined as symptoms occurring less than 4 consecutive days/week or less than 4 consecutive weeks/year. Persistent allergic rhinitis is defined as symptoms occurring more often than 4 consecutive days/week and for more than 4 consecutive weeks/year. Patients with allergic rhinitis should avoid inciting allergens. In addition, first-line treatment for mild intermittent or mild persistent allergic rhinitis may include a second-generation H1 antihistamine (eg, cetirizine, fexofenadine, desloratadine, loratadine) or an intranasal antihistamine (eg, azelastine, olopatadine), whereas patients with persistent moderate to severe allergic rhinitis should be treated initially with an intranasal corticosteroid (eg, fluticasone, triamcinolone, budesonide, mometasone) either alone or in combination with an intranasal antihistamine. In contrast, first-line therapy for patients with nonallergic rhinitis consists of an intranasal antihistamine as monotherapy or in combination with an intranasal corticosteroid. Conclusions and Relevance: Allergic rhinitis is associated with symptoms of nasal congestion, sneezing, and itching of the eyes, nose, and throat. Patients with allergic rhinitis should be instructed to avoid inciting allergens. Therapies include second-generation H1 antihistamines (eg, cetirizine, fexofenadine, desloratadine, loratadine), intranasal antihistamines (eg, azelastine, olopatadine), and intranasal corticosteroids (eg, fluticasone, triamcinolone, budesonide, mometasone) and should be selected based on the severity and frequency of symptoms and patient preference.


Glucocorticoids , Histamine Antagonists , Rhinitis, Allergic , Humans , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Budesonide/therapeutic use , Cetirizine/therapeutic use , Fluticasone/administration & dosage , Fluticasone/therapeutic use , Histamine H1 Antagonists/administration & dosage , Histamine H1 Antagonists/therapeutic use , Immunoglobulin E/immunology , Mometasone Furoate/administration & dosage , Mometasone Furoate/therapeutic use , Olopatadine Hydrochloride/administration & dosage , Olopatadine Hydrochloride/therapeutic use , Pruritus/etiology , Rhinitis, Allergic/complications , Rhinitis, Allergic/diagnosis , Rhinitis, Allergic/immunology , Rhinitis, Allergic/therapy , Rhinorrhea/etiology , Sneezing , Triamcinolone/administration & dosage , Triamcinolone/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Rhinitis/drug therapy , Histamine Antagonists/administration & dosage , Histamine Antagonists/therapeutic use , Administration, Intranasal
5.
J Asthma ; 61(6): 574-583, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38153316

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this pilot study was to assess the efficacy of doxofylline as an ICS-sparing agent in the treatment of Mexican children with asthma. METHODS: 10-week, open-label, crossover, pilot study, we examined the steroid-sparing effect of doxofylline in Mexican children with asthma. Patients aged 6-16 years treated with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) for at least 8 wk before enrollment were divided randomly into two groups at the baseline visit. Group A (n = 31) received doxofylline (18 mg/kg/day) plus standard-dose budesonide (D + SDB) for the first 4-week period followed by doxofylline plus reduced-dose budesonide (D + RDB) for the second 4-week period. Group B (n = 30) received D + RDB followed by D + SDB. Clinical outcomes assessed included lung function (forced expiratory volume; in 1 s, FEV1), fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO), asthma control, number of exacerbations and use of rescue medication (salbutamol). RESULTS: It was shown that combined use of doxofylline and ICS may allow children with asthma to reduce their daily dose of ICS while maintaining lung function and improving asthma control (p = 0.008). There were few asthma exacerbations and only one patient required treatment with systemic corticosteroids. Rescue medication use decreased significantly in patients receiving D + SDB during the first 4-week period. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that doxofylline may be a steroid-sparing treatment in asthma, but longer-term, controlled studies are needed to confirm these observations.


Asthma , Budesonide , Cross-Over Studies , Drug Therapy, Combination , Theophylline , Theophylline/analogs & derivatives , Humans , Child , Asthma/drug therapy , Male , Female , Adolescent , Mexico , Theophylline/therapeutic use , Theophylline/administration & dosage , Pilot Projects , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Budesonide/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/therapeutic use , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/administration & dosage , Administration, Inhalation , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Treatment Outcome , Forced Expiratory Volume/drug effects
6.
Kidney Int ; 103(2): 391-402, 2023 Feb.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36270561

The therapeutic potential of a novel, targeted-release formulation of oral budesonide (Nefecon) for the treatment of IgA nephropathy (IgAN) was first demonstrated by the phase 2b NEFIGAN trial. To verify these findings, the phase 3 NefigArd trial tested the efficacy and safety of nine months of treatment with Nefecon (16 mg/d) versus placebo in adult patients with primary IgAN at risk of progressing to kidney failure (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03643965). NefIgArd was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled two-part trial. In Part A, 199 patients with IgAN were treated with Nefecon or placebo for nine months and observed for an additional three months. The primary endpoint for Part A was 24-hour urine protein-to-creatinine ratio (UPCR) after nine months. Secondary efficacy outcomes evaluated included estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at nine and 12 months and the UPCR at 12 months. At nine months, UPCR was 27% lower in the Nefecon group compared with placebo, along with a benefit in eGFR preservation corresponding to a 3.87 ml/min/1.73 m2 difference versus placebo (both significant). Nefecon was well-tolerated, and treatment-emergent adverse events were mostly mild to moderate in severity and reversible. Part B is ongoing and will be reported on later. Thus, NefIgArd is the first phase 3 IgA nephropathy trial to show clinically important improvements in UPCR and eGFR and confirms the findings from the phase 2b NEFIGAN study.


Budesonide , Glomerulonephritis, IGA , Adult , Humans , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Double-Blind Method , Glomerular Filtration Rate , Glomerulonephritis, IGA/drug therapy , Kidney Function Tests , Treatment Outcome
8.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 51(4): 151-157, 2023. ilus, tab
Article En | IBECS | ID: ibc-222645

Background and aim: Bronchial asthma is a prevalent type of respiratory disease that affects a large proportion of pediatric patients. The purpose of this study is to further investigate the clinical effects of budesonide combined with montelukast sodium in treating bronchial asthma. Methods: Eighty-six children with bronchial asthma were equally divided into study and control groups via randomized double-blind controlled trial. The control group was treated with aerosol inhalation of budesonide combined with placebo, while the study group was treated with budesonide combined with montelukast sodium. Pulmonary function parameters, immunoglobulin, and recovery of related symptoms, along with the adverse reaction rate, were observed and compared between both groups. Results: Before treatment, there was no marked difference in pulmonary function parameters and immunoglobulin indexes between both groups (P > 0.05). All pulmonary function indicators and immunoglobulin indexes in both groups improved following therapy, with the study group outperforming the control group (P < 0.05). The recovery time of related symptoms in the study group was shorter than that in the control group (P < 0.05). The incidence of adverse reactions in both groups was compared, with notable differences (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Budesonide combined with montelukast sodium in the treatment of bronchial asthma has the value of clinical application and promotion (AU)


Humans , Child, Preschool , Child , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Asthma/drug therapy , Immunoglobulins/blood , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Leukotriene Antagonists/administration & dosage , Cytochrome P-450 CYP1A2/administration & dosage , Drug Therapy, Combination , Treatment Outcome
9.
Allergol. immunopatol ; 51(4): 182-188, 2023. tab
Article En | IBECS | ID: ibc-222649

Objective: To evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of combining omalizumab with budesonide formoterol to treat children with moderate and severe allergic asthma, and investigate the effect of this combination therapy on pulmonary and immune functions. Methods: The data of 88 children with moderate and severe allergic asthma, who were admitted to our hospital between July 2021 and July 2022, were included in the study. The patients were randomly assigned either to control group (n = 44; received budesonide formoterol inhalation therapy) or experimental group (n = 44; received omalizumab subcutaneous injection + budesonide formoterol inhalation therapy) using computer-generated randomization. The clinical efficacy, asthma control (measured using childhood Asthma-Control Test [C-ACT] score), pulmonary function (forced expiratory volume in 1 s, forced vital capacity, and peak expiratory flow), immune function (cluster of differentiation 3 cells [CD3+ cells], cluster of differentiation 4 cells [CD4+ cells], immunoglobulin G, immunoglobulin A, and immunoglobulin E), and adverse reactions were observed and compared between both groups. Results: After treatment, the experimental group had improved levels of pulmonary function and immune function indexes, higher C-ACT scores, and a higher overall response rate than the control group (P < 0.05). In addition, the incidence of adverse reactions was not significantly different between both groups (P > 0.05). Conclusion: The combination of omalizumab with budesonide formoterol for treating moderate and severe allergic asthma in children demonstrated promising clinical efficacy and improved their pulmonary and immune functions, leading to more rational asthma control. The combined regimen demonstrated satisfactory clinical safety and deserved clinical promotion (AU)


Humans , Male , Female , Child , Omalizumab/administration & dosage , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Asthma/drug therapy , Severity of Illness Index , Treatment Outcome , Drug Therapy, Combination
10.
Rev. chil. enferm. respir ; 39(3): 226-232, 2023. tab, graf
Article Es | LILACS | ID: biblio-1521831

El asma se caracteriza por su impacto deletéreo que incluye gran coste económico para el sistema de salud. En pacientes con asma mal controlada a pesar del tratamiento, se propone un régimen de mantenimiento con corticoides inhalados y formoterol. El objetivo del presente estudio observacional retrospectivo fue evaluar las modificaciones espirométricas tras el cambio del medicamento controlador en pacientes con asma moderada a severa asistidos en el Hospital Clínico de Magallanes de Punta Arenas, así como también cuantificar la modificación en el número de exacerbaciones graves (consulta a un servicio de urgencia y/u hospitalización por asma). Participaron 61 adultos con asma moderada a severa (mediana de edad: 60 años [rango: 21-87], mujeres: 69,4%; comorbilidad atópica/alérgica: 79%; otras comorbilidades: 46,8%) en los que se cambió el tratamiento con fluticasona/salmeterol 250/25 μg por budesónida/formoterol 160/4,5 μg. No se observaron cambios significativos en los índices espirométricos tras el cambio. Con el tratamiento inicial, el 46,9% presentó ≥ 1 visita a urgencias (total: 50 consultas). Tras el cambio por budesonida/formoterol, el 21% requirió al menos una visita a urgencias (total: 14 consultas; p < 0,01). La proporción de pacientes con ≥ 2 consultas a urgencias fue de 19,7% con el tratamiento basal y de 1,6% tras el cambio a budesonida/formoterol (p < 0,01). No se observaron diferencias significativas en la cantidad de hospitalizaciones. En este estudio del mundo real de pacientes con asma moderada a grave, el cambio del tratamiento a budesonida/formoterol se asoció con reducción significativa de las consultas a urgencias, a pesar de no detectarse cambios de significación estadística en los índices espirométricos habituales.


Asthma is characterized by its deleterious impact, including a high cost to the healthcare system. In patients with poorly controlled asthma despite treatment, a maintenance regimen of inhaled corticosteroids and formoterol is proposed. The aim of this retrospective, observational study was to evaluate the spirometric changes after switching the controller medication in patients with moderate to severe asthma attended in our institution ("Hospital Clínico de Magallanes"), as well as the variation in the number of severe exacerbations (consultation to an emergency department and/or hospitalization for asthma). Sixty-one adults with moderate to severe asthma (median age: 60 years-old [range: 21-87], women: 69.4%; atopic/allergic comorbidity: 79%; other comorbidities: 46.8%) in whom treatment with fluticasone/salmeterol 250/25 μg was switched to budesonide/formoterol 160/4.5 μg participated in our study. No significant changes in spirometric parameters were observed after the replacement treatment. With the initial treatment, 46.9% patients presented ≥ 1 visit to the emergency department (total: 50 visits). After the switch to budesonide/formoterol, 21% required at least one emergency department visit (total: 14 consultations; p < 0.01). The proportion of patients with ≥ 2 emergency department visits was 19.7% with baseline treatment and 1.6% after switching to budesonide/formoterol (p < 0.01). No significant differences were observed in the number of hospitalizations. In this real-world study of moderate to severe asthma patients, switching to budesonide/formoterol was associated with a significant reduction in emergency department visits, despite no statistically significant changes in the usual spirometric parameters.


Humans , Male , Female , Adult , Middle Aged , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Young Adult , Asthma/drug therapy , Spirometry , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Formoterol Fumarate/administration & dosage , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Drug Administration Schedule , Forced Expiratory Volume , Retrospective Studies , Drug Therapy, Combination , Fluticasone-Salmeterol Drug Combination/administration & dosage
11.
BMC Pulm Med ; 22(1): 254, 2022 Jun 27.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35761234

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a chronic inflammatory disease of the airways that causes recurring episodes of wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness and coughing. Inhaled drugs on a daily basis are the cornerstone of asthma treatment, therefore, patient adherence is very important. METHODS: We performed a multicenter, open, non-interventional, observational, prospective study of 716 adult patients diagnosed with asthma receiving FDC (Fixed-dose combination) budesonide/formoterol via the Elpenhaler device. We assessed the adherence to treatment at 3 and 6 months (based on the MMAS-8: 8-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale), the quality of life and change in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) from baseline to follow-up. RESULTS: Approximately 80% of the patients showed medium to high adherence throughout the study. The mean (SD) MMAS-8 score at 6 months was 6.85 (1.54) and we observed a statistically significant shift of patients from the low adherence group to the high adherence group at 6 months. Moreover, after 6 months of treatment with FDC budesonide/formoterol, we observed an increase in the patients' quality of life that as expressed by a change 2.01 (95%CI 1.93-2.10) units in Mini AQLQ (p < 0.0001) that was more pronounced in the high adherence group. The same trend was also observed in terms of spirometry (mean FEV1 2.58 L (0.85) at the end of the study, increased by 220 mL from baseline) with a higher improvement in the medium and high adherence groups. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with FDC of budesonide/formoterol via the Elpenhaler device was associated with improvement in asthma-related quality of life and lung function over 6 months that were more prominent in patients with higher adherence. TRIAL REGISTRATION: 2017-HAL-EL-74 (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03300076).


Asthma , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Formoterol Fumarate/administration & dosage , Quality of Life , Adult , Asthma/drug therapy , Asthma/psychology , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Budesonide/therapeutic use , Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Ethanolamines/adverse effects , Formoterol Fumarate/therapeutic use , Humans , Prospective Studies , Treatment Outcome
12.
N Engl J Med ; 386(22): 2071-2083, 2022 06 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35569035

BACKGROUND: As asthma symptoms worsen, patients typically rely on short-acting ß2-agonist (SABA) rescue therapy, but SABAs do not address worsening inflammation, which leaves patients at risk for severe asthma exacerbations. The use of a fixed-dose combination of albuterol and budesonide, as compared with albuterol alone, as rescue medication might reduce the risk of severe asthma exacerbation. METHODS: We conducted a multinational, phase 3, double-blind, randomized, event-driven trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of albuterol-budesonide, as compared with albuterol alone, as rescue medication in patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma who were receiving inhaled glucocorticoid-containing maintenance therapies, which were continued throughout the trial. Adults and adolescents (≥12 years of age) were randomly assigned in a 1:1:1 ratio to one of three trial groups: a fixed-dose combination of 180 µg of albuterol and 160 µg of budesonide (with each dose consisting of two actuations of 90 µg and 80 µg, respectively [the higher-dose combination group]), a fixed-dose combination of 180 µg of albuterol and 80 µg of budesonide (with each dose consisting of two actuations of 90 µg and 40 µg, respectively [the lower-dose combination group]), or 180 µg of albuterol (with each dose consisting of two actuations of 90 µg [the albuterol-alone group]). Children 4 to 11 years of age were randomly assigned to only the lower-dose combination group or the albuterol-alone group. The primary efficacy end point was the first event of severe asthma exacerbation in a time-to-event analysis, which was performed in the intention-to-treat population. RESULTS: A total of 3132 patients underwent randomization, among whom 97% were 12 years of age or older. The risk of severe asthma exacerbation was significantly lower, by 26%, in the higher-dose combination group than in the albuterol-alone group (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.62 to 0.89; P = 0.001). The hazard ratio in the lower-dose combination group, as compared with the albuterol-alone group, was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.71 to 1.00; P = 0.052). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the three trial groups. CONCLUSIONS: The risk of severe asthma exacerbation was significantly lower with as-needed use of a fixed-dose combination of 180 µg of albuterol and 160 µg of budesonide than with as-needed use of albuterol alone among patients with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe asthma who were receiving a wide range of inhaled glucocorticoid-containing maintenance therapies. (Funded by Avillion; MANDALA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03769090.).


Albuterol , Asthma , Budesonide , Administration, Inhalation , Adolescent , Adult , Albuterol/administration & dosage , Albuterol/adverse effects , Albuterol/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Budesonide/adverse effects , Budesonide/therapeutic use , Child , Child, Preschool , Double-Blind Method , Drug Combinations , Ethanolamines/therapeutic use , Formoterol Fumarate/therapeutic use , Glucocorticoids/administration & dosage , Glucocorticoids/adverse effects , Glucocorticoids/therapeutic use , Humans , Maintenance Chemotherapy , Nebulizers and Vaporizers , Symptom Flare Up , Young Adult
13.
J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv ; 35(3): 139-145, 2022 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34637629

Background: The emitted dose (ED) from most dry powder inhalers (DPIs) is almost independent of peak inspiratory flow (PIF) above a certain value, which is specific to the individual DPI. However, the ED of the Turbuhaler® (TBH) increases linearly with PIF increments. This study investigated the powder clearance and clinical utility of TBH performance features by using the photo-reflection method (PRM), a type of laser photometry. Methods: Pulmicort® (PLM) (containing budesonide only) and Symbicort® (SMB) (drugs with lactose particles) were inspired with a ramp-up pattern of several PIF intensities using a vacuum pump. Time trajectories of particle release and PIF were then compared. Results: The particle-release trajectories from both types of DPIs were similar, consisting of a sharp increment phase (∼0.15 seconds) followed by exponential decay. Both onset to the peak of particle-release time and particle-release times were not affected by PIF changes when the PIF was >40 L/min. EDs from both TBHs were linearly related to PIFs, and the slope of the regression equation for SMB was 2.4-fold larger than that of PLM. The peak of the released particles (PKIED) was also linearly related to PIF. A linear relationship was also observed between ED and PKIED in both TBHs, and these regression lines overlapped. Conclusion: EDs from the TBH were dependent on PKIED. Therefore, rapid, initially strong, and deep inhalation should be advised while using the TBH. PRM could measure the fine and small amount of particles released from the TBH.


Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination , Budesonide , Dry Powder Inhalers , Administration, Inhalation , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Inflammatory Agents/therapeutic use , Bronchodilator Agents/administration & dosage , Bronchodilator Agents/therapeutic use , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Budesonide/therapeutic use , Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination/administration & dosage , Budesonide, Formoterol Fumarate Drug Combination/therapeutic use , Lasers , Photometry
14.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm ; 170: 112-120, 2022 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34890789

In a strategy to improve macrophage targeting of glucocorticoids (GCs) for anti-inflammatory therapy, a so-called nanoprodrug of budesonide palmitate decorated by mannose moieties was designed. The synthesis of budesonide palmitate (BP) was obtained by esterification and mannosylated lipid (DSPE-PEG-Man) by reacting 1,2-Distearoyl-sn-Glycero-3-Phosphoethanolamine (DSPE)-polyethylene glycol-amine and α-D-mannopyranosylphenyl isothiocyanate (MPITC). Nanoparticles were formulated by emulsion-evaporation and different ratios of mannosylated lipid were introduced in the formulation of BP nanoprodrugs. Using up to 75% of DSPE-PEG-man (75/25) led to 200 nm particles with a polydispersity index below 0.2, a negative zeta potential ranging from -10 to -30 mV, and one-month stability at 4 °C. The encapsulation efficiency of BP approached 100% proving that the prodrug was associated with the particles, leading to a final BP loading of 50-to 60% (w/w). The lectin agglutination test confirmed the availability of mannose on the nanoprodrug surface. Nanoprodrug uptake by RAW 264.7 macrophages was observed by confocal microscopy and flow cytometry. After 24 and 48 h of incubation, a significantly greater internalization of mannosylated nanoparticles as compared to PEGylated nanoparticles was achieved. The mannose receptor-mediated uptake was confirmed by a mannan inhibition study. After LPS-induced inflammation, the anti-inflammatory effect of mannosylated nanoparticles was assessed. After 48 h of incubation, cytokines (MCP-1 and TNFα) were reduced demonstrating that the functionalization of nanoprodrugs is possible and efficient.


Budesonide/pharmacology , Mannose/pharmacology , Prodrugs/chemical synthesis , Animals , Biological Availability , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Cell Survival , Cells, Cultured , Cytokines/metabolism , Drug Compounding , Drug Delivery Systems , Drug Liberation , Drug Stability , Macrophages/drug effects , Mannose/administration & dosage , Mice , Nanoparticles , Tissue Distribution
15.
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces ; 14(1): 297-306, 2022 Jan 12.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34958191

Aromatized thioketal (ATK) linked the immunoregulatory molecule (budesonide, Bud) and the cytotoxic molecule (gemcitabine, Gem) to construct a ROS-activated Janus-prodrug, termed as BAG. Benefiting from the hydrogen bonding, π-π stacking, and other intermolecular interactions, BAG could self-assemble into nanoaggregates (BAG NA) with a well-defined spherical shape and uniform size distribution. Compared to the carrier-based drug delivery system, BAG NA have ultrahigh drug loading content and ROS concentration-dependent drug release. Colitis-associated colorectal cancer (CAC) is a typical disease in which chronic inflammation transforms into tumors. BAG NA can be internalized by colon cancer C26 cells and then triggered by excessive intracellular ROS to release nearly 100% of the drugs. Based on this, BAG NA showed a stronger pro-apoptotic effect than free Bud combined with free Gem. What is gratifying is that orally administered BAG NA can precisely accumulate in the diseased colon tissues of CAC mice induced by AOM/DSS and simultaneously release Bud and Gem. Bud can regulate the tumor immune microenvironment to restore and enhance the cytotoxicity of Gem. Therefore, BAG NA maximizes the synergistic therapeutic effect through co-delivery of Bud and Gem. This work provided a cutting-edge method for constructing self-delivery Janus-prodrug based on ATK and confirmed its potential application in inflammation-related carcinogenesis.


Antineoplastic Agents/pharmacology , Biocompatible Materials/pharmacology , Colitis-Associated Neoplasms/drug therapy , Colorectal Neoplasms/drug therapy , Drug Delivery Systems , Prodrugs/pharmacology , Animals , Antineoplastic Agents/administration & dosage , Antineoplastic Agents/chemistry , Biocompatible Materials/administration & dosage , Biocompatible Materials/chemistry , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Budesonide/chemistry , Budesonide/pharmacology , Cell Line , Colitis-Associated Neoplasms/metabolism , Colitis-Associated Neoplasms/pathology , Colorectal Neoplasms/metabolism , Colorectal Neoplasms/pathology , Deoxycytidine/administration & dosage , Deoxycytidine/analogs & derivatives , Deoxycytidine/chemistry , Deoxycytidine/pharmacology , Materials Testing , Mice , Mice, Inbred BALB C , Molecular Dynamics Simulation , Molecular Structure , Prodrugs/administration & dosage , Prodrugs/chemistry , Gemcitabine
16.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 43(1): 103214, 2022.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34607277

PURPOSE: Research indicates that most providers give opiates after endoscopic sinonasal surgery. The effectiveness of non-opiate medications after sinonasal surgery is poorly understood and most studies do not assess medication failure. This study compares oral opiate, oral opiate and topical steroid, and oral non-opiate pain control. Patient call-backs are used as a proxy for pain medication failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study compares three medication regiments after sinonasal surgery for 180 adults with chronic rhinosinusitis. Patients were instructed to take acetaminophen for mild pain. For moderate/severe pain, patients used: 1) oxycodone-acetaminophen, 2) oxycodone-acetaminophen + budesonide nasal rinses, or 3) meloxicam + acetaminophen. Patients were instructed to call clinic if pain was not controlled. Descriptive statistics compared cohorts. Chi-square tests compared call-backs between cohorts. Logistic regression adjusted for baseline differences in covariates, comorbidities, and operative sites. RESULTS: Cohorts had similar age, sex distribution, disease features, and extent of surgery. The meloxicam cohort had less subjects with pain disorders. The oxycodone cohort had less subjects with diabetes, septoplasty, and turbinate reduction. After adjusting for baseline differences and using oxycodone as the reference group (n = 50), the odds of calling clinic for poorly controlled pain was 0.18 (95% Confidence Interval (CI): 0.05-0.6) in the meloxicam cohort (n = 45) and 0.19 (95% CI:0.07-0.5) in the oxycodone + budesonide rinses cohort (n = 85). CONCLUSION: In this study, both meloxicam and oxycodone + budesonide rinses were more effective at controlling pain after sinonasal surgery than oxycodone alone.


Acetaminophen/administration & dosage , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Endoscopy/methods , Meloxicam/administration & dosage , Nasal Surgical Procedures/methods , Oxycodone/administration & dosage , Pain Management/methods , Pain, Postoperative/drug therapy , Rhinitis/surgery , Sinusitis/surgery , Therapeutic Irrigation/methods , Adult , Chronic Disease , Cohort Studies , Drug Combinations , Endoscopy/adverse effects , Female , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Nasal Surgical Procedures/adverse effects , Pain Measurement , Pain, Postoperative/diagnosis , Pain, Postoperative/etiology , Treatment Outcome
17.
Rev. Hosp. Ital. B. Aires (2004) ; 41(4): 187-192, dic. 2021. ilus
Article Es | LILACS, UNISALUD, BINACIS | ID: biblio-1366967

La sinusitis micótica alérgica es una enfermedad inflamatoria de la mucosa rinosinusal producida por hongos que pueden aislarse de la cavidad de nasal de individuos sanos. Se produce indirectamente por los hongos que actúan como antígeno y desencadenan una reacción inmunológica mediada por IgE que origina pólipos y una secreción mucosa espesa con detritus e hifas denominada mucina. Su presentación clínica más frecuente es una sinusitis crónica unilateral o bilateral con pólipos. Con menos frecuencia, las sustancias originadas por la desgranulación de los eosinófilos producen remodelación o destrucción ósea y la sinusitis puede simular una neoplasia. Se describe el caso clínico de un paciente que padeció una sinusitis micótica alérgica con destrucción ósea masiva de la base del cráneo y que tuvo extensión intracraneal extradural e intraorbitaria de la enfermedad. Fue tratado con éxito mediante cirugía y corticoides. (AU)


Allergic fungal sinusitis is an inflammatory disease of the rhinosinusal mucosa caused by fungi that can be isolated from the nasal cavity of healthy individuals. The pathology is produced indirectly by the fungus that acts as an antigen and triggers an IgE-mediated allergic reaction that causes polyps and a thick mucous discharge with detritus and hyphae called mucin. Its most common clinical presentation is unilateral or bilateral chronic sinusitis with polyps. Less commonly, substances originated by the degranulation of eosinophils cause bone remodeling or destruction, and sinusitis can simulate a neoplasia. We describe the clinical case of a patient who suffered from allergic fungal sinusitis with massive bone destruction of the skull base and who had intracranial, extradural and intraorbital extension of the disease. He was successfully treated with surgery and corticosteroids.Key words: allergic fungal sinusitis, intracranial extension, endoscopic surgery, transorbital transpalpebral approach. (AU)


Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Sinusitis/diagnostic imaging , Skull Base/physiopathology , Rhinitis, Allergic/diagnostic imaging , Invasive Fungal Infections/diagnostic imaging , Curvularia/pathogenicity , Sinusitis/surgery , Sinusitis/drug therapy , Prednisone/administration & dosage , Skull Base/surgery , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Rhinitis, Allergic/surgery , Rhinitis, Allergic/drug therapy , Invasive Fungal Infections/surgery , Invasive Fungal Infections/drug therapy
18.
Pharmacology ; 106(11-12): 616-622, 2021.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34518479

INTRODUCTION: A very limited option of inhaled corticosteroids (ICSs) is approved for pediatric use in China because in children the use of ICSs for long periods is associated with dose-dependent growth reduction. Due to the lack of consensus on which is the best ICS-based treatment option to manage mild persistent asthma in children, the present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of budesonide (BUD)-based therapy vis-à-vis mometasone-based therapy in children with mild persistent asthma. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective study was conducted in asthmatic children aged between 6 and 11 years. BUD and mometasone furoate (MF) were administered as per the approved dosing regimen using pressurized metered-dose inhalers via oral inhalation route for a period of 12 weeks. The study outcome was assessed in terms of the forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), symptom scores, and nonoccurrence of side effects. RESULTS: Among the 77 asthmatic children, 71 completed the study treatment and were used in carrying out the analysis. The improvement of spirometric parameters like FEV1, Tiffeneau-Pinelli index (FEV1/forced vital capacity [FVC]), and peak expiratory flow (PEF) values observed in the MF cohort was significantly greater than those of the BUD cohort (p < 0.05 for all). An increase of approximately 12%/child was observed for FEV1/FVC ratios for the BUD cohort and MF cohorts. After the 12-week study, the PEFm and PEFe values increased to about 50 L/min/child for the BUD cohort and about 98 L/min/child for the MF cohort. During the study, no asthma exacerbation event was observed in the MF cohort, whereas 1 child in the BUD cohort had asthma exacerbation in week 4. The use of rescue medication during the study was required for 16.2 and 6% of children, respectively, for BUD and MF cohorts. Owing to low dosing frequency, MF could provide a better treatment approach than BUD due to improved patient compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Although both drugs showed improvement in the quality of life of asthmatic children with manageable treatment-emergent adverse effects, the improvement was augmented in MF-treated children. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: The level of evidence was III. Technical Efficacy Stage: The technical efficacy stage was 4.


Anti-Asthmatic Agents/therapeutic use , Asthma/drug therapy , Budesonide/therapeutic use , Mometasone Furoate/therapeutic use , Administration, Inhalation , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/administration & dosage , Anti-Asthmatic Agents/adverse effects , Budesonide/administration & dosage , Budesonide/adverse effects , Child , China , Drug Dosage Calculations , Female , Humans , Male , Metered Dose Inhalers , Mometasone Furoate/administration & dosage , Mometasone Furoate/adverse effects , Quality of Life , Respiratory Function Tests , Retrospective Studies
19.
Viruses ; 13(7)2021 07 20.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34372616

Treatment options for COVID-19, a disease caused by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection, are currently severely limited. Therefore, antiviral drugs that efficiently reduce SARS-CoV-2 replication or alleviate COVID-19 symptoms are urgently needed. Inhaled glucocorticoids are currently being discussed in the context of treatment for COVID-19, partly based on a previous study that reported reduced recovery times in cases of mild COVID-19 after inhalative administration of the glucocorticoid budesonide. Given various reports that describe the potential antiviral activity of glucocorticoids against respiratory viruses, we aimed to analyze a potential antiviral activity of budesonide against SARS-CoV-2 and circulating variants of concern (VOC) B.1.1.7 (alpha) and B.1.351 (beta). We demonstrate a dose-dependent inhibition of SARS-CoV-2 that was comparable between all viral variants tested while cell viability remains unaffected. Our results are encouraging as they could indicate a multimodal mode of action of budesonide against SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19, which could contribute to an improved clinical performance.


Antiviral Agents/pharmacology , Budesonide/pharmacology , COVID-19 Drug Treatment , SARS-CoV-2/drug effects , Adrenal Cortex Hormones/pharmacology , Animals , Antiviral Agents/administration & dosage , Budesonide/administration & dosage , COVID-19/virology , Chlorocebus aethiops , Glucocorticoids/pharmacology , Humans , Vero Cells , Virus Replication/drug effects
...