Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 5 de 5
Filtrar
Más filtros











Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
2.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25562642

RESUMEN

Susan Band Horwitz is a Distinguished Professor and holds the Falkenstein Chair in Cancer Research at Albert Einstein College of Medicine in New York. She is co-chair of the Department of Molecular Pharmacology and associate director for therapeutics at the Albert Einstein Cancer Center. After graduating from Bryn Mawr College, Dr. Horwitz received her PhD in biochemistry from Brandeis University. She has had a continuing interest in natural products as a source of new drugs for the treatment of cancer. Her most seminal research contribution has been in the development of Taxol(®). Dr. Horwitz and her colleagues made the discovery that Taxol had a unique mechanism of action and suggested that it was a prototype for a new class of antitumor drugs. Although Taxol was an antimitotic agent blocking cells in the metaphase stage of the cell cycle, Dr. Horwitz recognized that Taxol was blocking mitosis in a way different from that of other known agents. Her group demonstrated that the binding site for Taxol was on the ß-tubulin subunit. The interaction of Taxol with the ß-tubulin subunit resulted in stabilized microtubules, essentially paralyzing the cytoskeleton, thereby preventing cell division. Dr. Horwitz served as president (2002-2003) of the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR). She is a member of the National Academy of Sciences, the Institute of Medicine, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the American Philosophical Society. She has received numerous honors and awards, including the C. Chester Stock Award from Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, the Warren Alpert Foundation Prize from Harvard Medical School, the Bristol-Myers Squibb Award for Distinguished Achievement in Cancer Research, the American Cancer Society's Medal of Honor, and the AACR Award for Lifetime Achievement in Cancer Research. The following interview was conducted on January 23, 2014.


Asunto(s)
Investigación Biomédica/historia , Descubrimiento de Drogas/historia , Farmacología/historia , Alcanos/historia , Antineoplásicos Fitogénicos/historia , Carbamatos/historia , Selección de Profesión , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Lactonas/historia , Terapia Molecular Dirigida/historia , Paclitaxel/historia , Pironas/historia , Moduladores de Tubulina/historia
3.
Chem Biol Interact ; 203(1): 221-5, 2013 Mar 25.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22926007

RESUMEN

The anticholinesterase (antiChE) organophosphorus (OP) and methylcarbamate (MC) insecticides have been used very effectively as contact and systemic plant protectants for seven decades. About 90 of these compounds are still in use - the largest number for any insecticide chemotype or mode of action. In both insects and mammals, AChE inhibition and acetylcholine accumulation leads to excitation and death. The cholinergic system of insects is located centrally (where it is protected from ionized OPs and MCs) but not at the neuromuscular junction. Structural differences between insect and mammalian AChE are also evident in their genomics, amino acid sequences and active site conformations. Species selectivity is determined in part by inhibitor and target site specificity. Pest population selection with OPs and MCs has resulted in a multitude of modified AChEs of altered inhibitor specificity some conferring insecticide resistance and others enhancing sensitivity. Much of the success of antiChE insecticides results from a suitable balance of bioactivation and detoxification by families of CYP450 oxidases, hydrolases, glutathione S-transferases and others. Known inhibitors for these enzymes block detoxification and enhance potency which is particularly important in resistant strains. The current market for OPs and MCs of 19% of worldwide insecticide sales is only half of that of 10 years ago for several reasons: there have been no major new compounds for 30 years; resistance has eroded their effectiveness; human toxicity problems are still encountered; the patents have expired reducing the incentive to update registration packages; alternative chemotypes or control methods have been developed. Despite this decline, they still play a major role in pest control and the increasing knowledge on their target sites and metabolism may make it possible to redesign the inhibitors for insensitive AChEs and to target new sites in the cholinergic system. The OPs and MCs are down but not out.


Asunto(s)
Inhibidores de la Colinesterasa , Insecticidas , Acetilcolinesterasa/química , Acetilcolinesterasa/genética , Acetilcolinesterasa/metabolismo , Animales , Carbamatos/historia , Carbamatos/metabolismo , Carbamatos/farmacología , Dominio Catalítico , Inhibidores de la Colinesterasa/historia , Inhibidores de la Colinesterasa/metabolismo , Inhibidores de la Colinesterasa/farmacología , Resistencia a Medicamentos , Historia del Siglo XX , Historia del Siglo XXI , Humanos , Insectos/efectos de los fármacos , Insectos/metabolismo , Insecticidas/historia , Insecticidas/metabolismo , Insecticidas/farmacología , Modelos Moleculares , Compuestos Organofosforados/historia , Compuestos Organofosforados/metabolismo , Compuestos Organofosforados/farmacología , Filogenia
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA