A cost-utility analysis of avelumab for metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma in Taiwan.

BACKGROUND: Metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (mMCC) has traditionally been managed with palliative chemotherapy regimens or best supportive care (BSC). Avelumab, a novel anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) human monoclonal antibody for mMCC treatment, is being studied in the pivotal JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial. AIM: Incorporating trial results, this analysis aimed to evaluate the cost-utility of avelumab in Taiwan. METHODS AND RESULTS: A de novo partitioned-survival model with three key health states related to survival (progression-free disease, progressed disease, and death) was applied in this study. The data of clinical efficacy, safety, and patient utilities were obtained from the JAVELIN Merkel 200 trial, literature review, and Taiwanese clinical expert opinion. Cost-utility analysis was performed, and results were presented as cost per quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gained. For treatment-naïve patients, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) for avelumab vs BSC and avelumab vs chemotherapy were US$44885.06 and US$42993.06 per QALY gained, respectively. As to treatment-experienced mMCC patients, avelumab was associated with ICERs of US$27243.06 (vs BSC)/US$26557.43 (vs chemotherapy) per QALY gained. All ICERs remained consistently within the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of US$53,333.33 per QALY gained. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated avelumab to be a cost-effective treatment option for both treatment-experienced and treatment-naïve mMCC patients with very poor prognosis in Taiwan.

Treatment patterns, comorbidities, healthcare resource use, and associated costs by line of chemotherapy and level of comorbidity in patients with newly-diagnosed Merkel cell carcinoma in the United States.

AIMS: To examine the characteristics of patients with newly-diagnosed Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), analyze their treatment patterns and comorbidities after diagnosis, and evaluate the economic burden on the MCC patient population in the US. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This observational, non-interventional cohort study identified patients with MCC that were newly-diagnosed between January 1, 2010 through December 31, 2014, and whose data were either in the MarketScan Commercial Claims and Encounters (CCAE) or Medicare Supplemental and Coordination of Benefits databases. Standard descriptive statistics were used to describe patient demographics, clinical characteristics, treatment regimens, and healthcare resource use (HRU) and cost. RESULTS: Following MCC diagnosis, most patients in the study population (n = 2,177) received only surgery (34.5%) or surgery and radiotherapy without chemotherapy (22.0%), while 14.5% of patients received none of these treatments; 27.5% of patients received at least one line of chemotherapy as part of their treatment. Mean total healthcare costs per patient per year (PPPY), as well as mean inpatient, outpatient, and pharmacy costs, were significantly greater for patients who received chemotherapy compared with those who received other or no treatments. Higher HRU and mean costs were associated with increasing patient comorbidity burden, ranging from $62,401 PPPY in Deyo Charlson Comorbidity Index level 1 to $109,690 in level ≥3. LIMITATIONS: The study used claims databases that were limited to patients who are covered by large employer-sponsored insurance and/or Medicare and did not provide information regarding the rationale for treatment choice or resource use. CONCLUSIONS: The choice of treatment is a major factor in determining healthcare costs associated with MCC, with the highest costs in patients receiving chemotherapy. Patients with MCC often exhibit comorbidities, and both HRU and healthcare costs increase significantly with each comorbidity level.