Social determinants of health in uterine carcinosarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: UCS survival outcome disparities by race have been reported. We aimed to investigate social determinants of health (SDOH) and their relation to survival outcomes in women at two affiliated high-volume institutions serving a racially and economically diverse population. METHODS: Women diagnosed with stage I-IV UCS treated at St. Paul University Hospital, University of Texas Southwestern (UTSW) Zale Lipshy Pavilion-William P. Clements Jr. University Hospital, and Parkland Memorial Hospital between 1992 and 2022 were eligible. Patients were identified by the local tumor registries; a retrospective study was conducted. The Pearson chi-square test was utilized for categorical variables. OS and PFS were calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimates and compared with the log-rank test. Multivariate Cox models were used to identify independent prognostic factors. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS, version 9.4. RESULTS: Over half of the 218 patients with UCS were NHB. 35% of the patients had stage IV disease. Most HSP and NHB patients had a lower median household income* than Asian/Pacific Islander (API) or NHW (p < 0.001). Stage at diagnosis significantly affected OS (p < 0.001) but not PFS (p = 0.46) in univariate analyses. Accounting for age at diagnosis, insurance, income*, hospital, distance between hospital and home, months from diagnosis to first treatment, stage, and adjuvant therapy, race was significant for OS (p = 0.03) and PFS (p = 0.04). *Median household income by ZIP Code. CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities were seen in median household income. Most SDOH independently analyzed in this study did not affect OS. The complex interaction between race and stage in UCS survival outcomes needs further investigation.

The prevalence and prognostic impact of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in uterine carcinosarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence and prognostic role of tumor microenvironment (TME) markers in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) through immunohistochemical characterization. METHODS: The internal database of our institution was queried out for women with UCS who underwent surgery and thereafter postoperative chemotherapy with carboplatin and paclitaxel between January 2012 and December 2017. Tissue microarrays containing surgical samples of UCS from 57 women were assessed by immunohistochemistry for CD3, CD4, CD8, FOXP3, PD-1, PD-L1, and PD-L2. RESULTS: The mean age was 65.3 years (range, 49 to 79 years). For the epithelial component (E), CD3_E and CD4_E were highly expressed in 38 (66.7%) and in 40 (70.1%) patients, respectively, and were significantly associated with more advanced stages (p = 0.038 and p = 0.025, respectively). CD8_E was highly expressed in 42 (73.7%) patients, FOXP3_E 16 (28.1%), PD-1_E 35 (61.4%), PD-L1_E 27 (47.4%) and PD-L2_E 39 (68.4%). For the sarcomatous component (S), the prevalence of high expression was: CD3_S 6 (10.5%), CD4_S 20 (35.1%), CD8_S 44 (77.2%), FOXP3_S 8 (14%), PD-1_S 14 (24.6%), PD-L1_S 14 (24.6%) and PD-L2_S 8 (14%). By multivariate analysis, the CD8/FOXP3_S ratio (p = 0.026), CD4_E (p = 0.010), PD-L1_E (p = 0.013) and PD-L1_S (p = 0.008) markers significantly influenced progression-free survival. CD4/FOXP3_S ratio (p = 0.043), PD-1_E (p = 0.011), PD-L1_E (p = 0.036) and PD-L1_S (p = 0.028) had a significant association with overall survival. CONCLUSION: Some differences in UCS clinical outcomes may be due to the subtype of TILs and PD-1/PD-L1 axis immune checkpoint signaling.

Minimally Invasive Compared With Open Hysterectomy in High-Risk Endometrial Cancer.

OBJECTIVE: To compare disease-free survival between minimally invasive surgery and open surgery in patients with high-risk endometrial cancer. METHODS: We conducted a multicentric, propensity-matched study of patients with high-risk endometrial cancer who underwent hysterectomy, bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and staging between January 1999 and June 2016 at two centers. High-risk endometrial cancer included grade 3 endometrioid, serous, clear cell, undifferentiated carcinoma or carcinosarcoma with any myometrial invasion. Patients were categorized a priori into two groups based on surgical approach, propensity scores were calculated based on potential confounders and groups were matched 1:1 using nearest neighbor technique. Cox hazard regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier curves evaluated the association of surgical technique with survival. RESULTS: Of 626 eligible patients, 263 (42%) underwent minimally invasive surgery and 363 (58%) underwent open surgery. In the matched cohort, there were no differences in disease-free survival rates at 5 years between open (53.4% [95% CI 45.6-60.5%]) and minimally invasive surgery (54.6% [95% CI 46.6-61.8]; P=.82). Minimally invasive surgery was not associated with worse disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.85, 95% CI 0.63-1.16; P=.30), overall survival (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.73-1.48, P=.81), or recurrence rate (HR 0.99; 95% CI 0.69-1.44; P=.99) compared with open surgery. Use of uterine manipulator was not associated with worse disease-free survival (HR 1.01, 95% CI 0.65-1.58, P=.96), overall survival (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.71-1.96, P=.53), or recurrence rate (HR 1.12, 95% CI 0.67-1.87; P=.66). CONCLUSION: There was no difference in oncologic outcomes comparing minimally invasive and open surgery among patients with high-risk endometrial cancer.

Nomogram to predict overall survival based on the log odds of positive lymph nodes for patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma after surgery.

PURPOSE: Aims to compare the prognostic performance of the number of positive lymph nodes (PLNN), lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of metastatic lymph nodes (LODDS) and establish a prognostic nomogram to predict overall survival (OS) rate for patients with endometrial carcinosarcoma (ECS). METHODS: Patients were retrospectively obtained from Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database from 2004 to 2015. The prognostic value of PLNN, LNR and LODDS were assessed. A prediction model for OS was established based on univariate and multivariate analysis of clinical and demographic characteristics of ECS patients. The clinical practical usefulness of the prediction model was valued by decision curve analysis (DCA) through quantifying its net benefits. RESULTS: The OS prediction accuracy of LODDS for ECS is better than that of PLNN and LNR. Five factors, age, tumor size, 2009 FIGO, LODDS and peritoneal cytology, were independent prognostic factors of OS. The C-index of the nomogram was 0.743 in the training cohort. The AUCs were 0.740, 0.682 and 0.660 for predicting 1-, 3- and 5-year OS, respectively. The calibration plots and DCA showed good clinical applicability of the nomogram, which is better than 2009 FIGO staging system. These results were verified in the validation cohort. A risk classification system was built that could classify ECS patients into three risk groups. The Kaplan-Meier curves showed that OS in the different groups was accurately differentiated by the risk classification system and performed much better than FIGO 2009. CONCLUSION: Our results indicated that LODDS was an independent prognostic indicator for ECS patients, with better predictive efficiency than PLNN and LNR. A novel prognostic nomogram for predicting the OS rate of ECS patients was established based on the population in the SEER database. Our nomogram based on LODDS has a more accurate and convenient value for predicting the OS of ECS patients than the FIGO staging system alone.

Matched-pair Analysis for Survival Endpoints Between Women With Early-stage Uterine Carcinosarcoma and Uterine Serous Carcinoma.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare survival endpoints between women with uterine carcinosarcoma and those with uterine serous carcinoma utilizing matching analysis. METHODS: Patients with stages I to II who underwent hysterectomy at our institution were included in this analysis. Patients with carcinosarcoma were then matched to patients with serous carcinoma based on stage, and adjuvant management received (observation, radiation treatment alone, chemotherapy alone, or combined modality with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Recurrence-free survival, disease-specific survival, and overall survival were calculated for the 2 groups. RESULTS: A total of 134 women were included (67 women with carcinosarcoma and 67 with serous carcinoma, matched 1:1). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups regarding 5-year recurrence-free survival (59% vs. 62%), disease-specific survival (66% vs. 67%), or overall survival (53% vs. 57%), respectively. The only independent predictor of shorter recurrence-free survival for the entire cohort was the lack of adjuvant combined modality therapy, while lower uterine segment involvement was the only independent predictor for shorter disease-specific survival. Lack of lymph node dissection and lack of adjuvant combined modality therapy were independent predictors of shorter overall survival. DISCUSSION: When matched based on stage and adjuvant treatment, our study suggests that there is no statistically significant difference in survival endpoints between women with early-stage carcinosarcoma and serous carcinoma. Adjuvant combined modality treatment is an independent predictor of longer recurrence-free survival and overall survival.

Bevacizumab in advanced endometrial cancer.

OBJECTIVE: Prospective data have demonstrated the efficacy of bevacizumab monotherapy in the treatment of advanced endometrial cancer. Bevacizumab is used off-label, and real-world data regarding the role of bevacizumab in endometrial cancer treatment are scant. In this largest single-institution retrospective study of its kind, we report our experience with bevacizumab monotherapy in the treatment of advanced/recurrent endometrial cancer. METHODS: All eligible patients (n = 101) had histologically confirmed endometrial cancer and were treated with bevacizumab at our institution from 2004 to 2017. Demographic data and tumor characteristics were obtained through chart review. Primary objective was response to therapy determined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1). RESULTS: Analysis included 13 grade 1/2 endometrioid, 15 grade 3 endometrioid, 44 serous, 8 carcinosarcoma, and 21 other/mixed histologies. No patients achieved complete (CR) or partial (PR) responses; 19 achieved stable disease (SD). The clinical benefit rate (CBR; CR + PR + SD) was 19% (95% CI: 12-28%). The CBRs were 7%, 17%, 21%, and 23% for patients with 1, 2, 3, and ≥ 4 prior treatment lines. Median PFS ranged from 2.6 months (2 lines) to 4.9 months (≥4 lines). The 3-year OS rate was 58% (95% CI: 47-67%). The median OS was 3.4 years (95% CI: 2.9-4.2), ranging from 2.5 years (2 lines) to 4.5 years (≥4 lines). The most common treatment-related adverse event was hypertension; 35 (78%) of 45 were grade 1 or 2. CONCLUSIONS: In heavily pretreated advanced endometrial cancer, bevacizumab was associated with modest clinical efficacy and remains a viable palliative option in this setting.

Pancreatic Carcinosarcoma Clinical Outcome Analysis of the National Cancer Institute Database.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic carcinosarcomas (PCS) are rare aggressive biphasic malignancies with a poor prognosis. We aimed to improve the understanding of PCS by analyzing variables that influence the mortality of PCS patients. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database was queried for cases of PCS from 1973 to 2016. Cases were analyzed for patient demographics, tumor characteristics, and surgical intervention. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses were applied to investigate the overall survival (OS) and prognostic factors. RESULTS: Thirty-nine cases of PCS were identified along with the disease demographics and characteristics. The majority of patients had a regionally invasive or metastatic disease. There was a significant decrease in OS with the increase of the tumor extension. Conversely, surgery showed to improve OS in the crude analysis, including patients that underwent lymphadenectomy. In addition, the unadjusted Cox regression results showed decreased hazard ratios with a local disease versus distant metastasis and with cancer-directed surgery versus no surgery. Nevertheless, the adjusted Cox regression results revealed that metastatic disease was the only significant predictor of survival. CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study provides some insight to a very rare disease by analyzing 39 cases of PCS. Our finding suggests considering PCS as a nonsurgical disease and reserving surgery solely for patients with a localized disease in combination or after neoadjuvant therapy. Consequently, there is a need to further investigate novel therapies for this aggressive malignancy.

Results of treating primary pulmonary sarcomas and pulmonary carcinosarcomas.

OBJECTIVE: Primary pulmonary sarcomas (PPS) and pulmonary carcinosarcomas (PCS) are rare aggressive lung malignancies. We reviewed our 21-year experience with the surgical and nonsurgical treatment of both tumors, comparing their clinical, histopathologic, and treatment results. METHODS: All patients with PPS or PCS who underwent surgical and nonsurgical treatment between 1998 and 2019 at our cancer center were retrospectively reviewed. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards model was constructed. RESULTS: In total, 100 patients were analyzed: 45 with PPS and 55 with PCS. Among patients with PPS, 31 of 45 (69%) underwent surgery with 1 (3%) operative mortality. For patients with PCS, 29 of 55 (53%) underwent surgery with no operative mortality. Patients with PPS were younger than PCS (P < .01). Fewer patients were smokers among PPS (58%) versus PCS (93%) (P < .01). For resected PPS, mean tumor size was 8.2 ± 4.1 cm (range 2.2-18.0) compared with 10.1 ± 5.0 cm (range 3.9-17.0) for unresected PPS. Tumor size for resected PCS was 6.2 ± 2.6 cm (range 2.0-10.5) versus 6.8 ± 3.5 cm (range 1.2-13.5) for unresected PCS. Of resected patients, 5 of 31 (16%) with PPS and 9 of 29 (31%) with PCS were node positive. Overall survival estimates were as follows: for PPS, median survival and 5-year overall survival for resected versus unresected cases were 39.6 months/28.7% versus 4.9 months/7.8%. For PCS, survival estimates were 23.6 months/31.0% versus 14.9 months/28.2%, respectively. In multivariable analyses (N = 100), age, smoking history, histology, and surgery were risk factors of survival. CONCLUSIONS: At initial evaluation, PPS and PCS presented with large-sized tumors and usually were not stage I. Surgery had a positive impact on survival among patients with PPS. Whenever feasible, surgical resection, even in locally advanced disease, may yield long-term survival in these aggressive lung tumors, although the level of evidence is low.

Impact of different adjuvant treatment approaches on survival in stage III endometrial cancer: A population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Patients with International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage III endometrial cancer (EC) have a substantial risk of adverse outcomes. After surgery, adjuvant therapy is recommended with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), chemotherapy (CT) or both EBRT and CT. Recent trials suggest that EBRT + CT is superior to EBRT or CT alone but also results in more toxicity. We have compared the outcome of different adjuvant treatments in a population-based cohort to identify subgroups that benefit most from EBRT + CT. METHODS: All patients diagnosed with FIGO stage III EC and treated with surgery in 2005-2016 were identified from the Netherlands Cancer Registry. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); associations with adjuvant treatment were analysed using Cox regression analysis. RESULTS: Among 1241 eligible patients, EBRT + CT was associated with a better OS than CT (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.34-2.52) and EBRT alone (HR = 1.37, 95% CI = 1.05-1.79). In stage IIIC, there was a significant benefit of EBRT + CT compared with CT or EBRT alone. In stage IIIA-B, there was no difference between EBRT + CT or EBRT alone. In endometrioid EC (EEC) and carcinosarcomas, EBRT + CT was associated with a better OS than CT or EBRT alone. For uterine serous cancers, there was no survival benefit of EBRT + CT over CT. In all analysis by stage and histology, any adjuvant treatment was superior to no adjuvant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: In this population-based study, adjuvant EBRT + CT was associated with improved OS compared with CT or EBRT alone in FIGO stage IIIC EC, EEC and carcinosarcoma. This suggests that application of EBRT + CT in stage III should be further stratified according to these subgroups.

Rare Histological Variants of Prostate Adenocarcinoma: A National Cancer Database Analysis.

PURPOSE: The American Joint Committee on Cancer recognizes 6 rare histological variants of prostate adenocarcinoma. We describe the contemporary presentation and overall survival of these rare variants. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 1,345,618 patients who were diagnosed with prostate adenocarcinoma between 2004 and 2015 within the National Cancer Database. We focused on the variants mucinous, ductal, signet ring cell, adenosquamous, sarcomatoid and neuroendocrine. Characteristics at presentation for each variant were compared with nonvariant prostate adenocarcinoma. Cox regression was used to study the impact of histological variant on overall mortality. RESULTS: Few (0.38%) patients presented with rare variant prostate adenocarcinoma. All variants had higher clinical tumor stage at presentation than nonvariant (all p <0.001). Metastatic disease was most common with neuroendocrine (62.9%), followed by sarcomatoid (33.3%), adenosquamous (31.1%), signet ring cell (10.3%) and ductal (9.8%), compared to 4.2% in nonvariant (all p <0.001). Metastatic disease in mucinous (3.3%) was similar to nonvariant (p=0.2). Estimated 10-year overall survival was highest in mucinous (78.0%), followed by nonvariant (71.1%), signet ring cell (56.8%), ductal (56.3%), adenosquamous (20.5%), sarcomatoid (14.6%) and neuroendocrine (9.1%). At multivariable analysis, mortality was higher in ductal (HR 1.38, p <0.001), signet ring cell (HR 1.53, p <0.01), neuroendocrine (HR 5.72, p <0.001), sarcomatoid (HR 5.81, p <0.001) and adenosquamous (HR 9.34, p <0.001) as compared to nonvariant. CONCLUSIONS: Neuroendocrine, adenosquamous, sarcomatoid, signet ring cell and ductal variants more commonly present with metastases. All variants present with higher local stage than nonvariant. Neuroendocrine is associated with the worst and mucinous with the best overall survival.

Racial disparities in uterine and ovarian carcinosarcoma: A population-based analysis of treatment and survival.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate racial disparities in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS) and ovarian carcinosarcoma (OCS) in Commission on Cancer®-accredited facilities. METHODS: Non-Hispanic Black (NHB) and non-Hispanic White (NHW) women in the National Cancer Database diagnosed with stage I-IV UCS or OCS between 2004 and 2014 were eligible. Differences by disease site or race were compared using Chi-square test and multivariate Cox analysis. RESULTS: There were 2830 NHBs and 7366 NHWs with UCS, and 280 NHBs and 2586 NHWs with OCS. Diagnosis of UCS was more common in NHBs (11.5%) vs. NHWs (3.7%) and increased with age (P < .0001). OCS diagnosis remained <5% in both races and all ages. NHBs with UCS or OCS were more common in the South and more likely to have a comorbidity score ≥ 1, low neighborhood income and Medicaid or no insurance (P < .0001). Diagnosis at stage II-IV was more common in NHBs than NHWs with UCS but not OCS. NHBs with both UCS and OCS were less likely to undergo surgery and to achieve no gross residual disease with surgery (P = .002). Risk of death in NHB vs. NHW patients with UCS was 1.38 after adjustment for demographic factors and dropped after sequential adjustment for comorbidity score, neighborhood income, insurance status, stage and treatment by 4%, 16%, 7%, 19% and 10%, respectively, leaving 43.5% of the racial disparity in survival unexplained. In contrast, risk of death in NHBs vs. NHWs with OCS was 1.19 after adjustment for demographic factors and became insignificant after adjustment for comorbidity. Race was an independent prognostic factor in UCS but not in OCS. CONCLUSIONS: Racial disparities exist in characteristics, treatment and survival in UCS and OCS with distinctions that merit additional research.

Clinicopathologic Diagnostic and Prognostic Factors of Spindle Cell Carcinoma of Upper Airway.

Spindle cell carcinoma (SpCC) is a rare tumor, which occurs in upper respiratory tract, mainly in larynx. This study aimed to review the clinical and pathological characteristics for diagnosis and prognosis. Retrospective cohort study. All patients with SpCC in upper respiratory tract treated for curative intent was included. All patients were reviewed in search of epithelial component and immunohistochemistry when not found. It was evaluated rate of recurrence and disease-free survival with univariate and multivariate analysis with Kaplan Meier and Cox Regression model adjusted to propensity score indexes (PSI) according to age, gender, site of tumor, stage, surgical treatment, status of margins of surgical resection, lymphatic invasion. There were 16 cases of SpCC.31% were diagnosed with light microscopy and others with immunohistochemistry for epithelial marker. Disease-free survival was higher in early stage disease in univariate and multivariate analysis, as the main prognostic factor. Surgical treatment increases in 2.54 the rate of survival. The SpCC is a rare tumor considered a highly malignant variant of squamous cell carcinoma. It has male predominance and tobacco use as risk factors. Its treatment should follow the same recommendations for squamous cell carcinoma, with surgery as the maintain treatment. Immunohistochemistry is an adjuvant important tool for diagnosis of SpCC.

Pulmonary Carcinosarcoma: A Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary carcinosarcoma (PC) is a rare malignant neoplasm composed of epithelial and mesenchymal components. It accounts for < 1% of thoracic cancers and is not fully understood. This study examined Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data to describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with PC and assessed survival outcomes by treatment modality and stage. PATIENTS AND METHODS: SEER data were reviewed to identify patients diagnosed with primary PC (1973-2012). Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed by univariate/multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier methods. RESULTS: A total of 411 patients were included. Median age was 67 (range, 24-96) years. Disease stage at the time of initial diagnosis was known for 74.7% of the identified patients (307/411). Of these patients, 23.1% had localized disease. Survival was significantly better for patients with localized disease (OS: 31 vs. 6 months, P < .001; DSS: 54 vs. 8 months, P < .001). Additionally, patients who received surgery alone had significantly improved OS (20 months; P < .001) and DSS (32 months; P < .001) compared to patients who received combined surgery and radiotherapy (OS: 7 months; DSS: 8 months) or radiotherapy alone (OS: 4 months; DSS: 4 months). CONCLUSION: Treatment with surgery alone resulted in superior survival outcomes compared to other treatment modality combinations, regardless of patient age and disease stage. Within the limitations of this study, providers may wish to consider these findings when devising patient treatment plans.

Pulmonary carcinosarcoma: analysis from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database.

OBJECTIVES: Pulmonary carcinosarcoma (PCS) is a rare neoplasm. This study explored the clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes of PCS. METHODS: The Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database (1988-2014) was queried for PCS. Overall survival (OS) was evaluated by multivariable Cox regression and nomograms were constructed to predict 3-year OS for PCS. Prognostic performance was evaluated using concordance index and area under the curve analysis. In M0 surgically treated patients, interaction assessments were performed using likelihood ratio tests. Subgroup analysis was performed according to patient age. The clinical features of PCSs were further compared to other non-small-cell lung cancers (NSCLCs). RESULTS: Multivariable analysis identified age [hazard ratio (HR) 1.03, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.04], surgery (HR 0.53, 95% CI 0.36-0.77) and chemotherapy (HR 0.51, 95% CI 0.36-0.73) as significantly associated with OS. The nomogram had a concordance index of 0.747 and an area under the curve of 0.803. The association between age and OS was stronger in those receiving pneumonectomy (P = 0.04 for interactions) compared to those that did not (HR 5.14, 95% CI 1.64-16.07), and was associated with a poorer outcome compared to lobectomy amongst the elderly (age ≥ 70 years). Patients with PCS were more likely to receive surgical treatment and had lower lymphatic metastasis compared to adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and large cell carcinoma (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: PCS had unique clinical features compared to common types of NSCLCs in terms of lymphatic invasion and surgical treatment. Pneumonectomy was associated with poorer survival in elderly patients.

Clinicopathological characteristics and survival outcomes in breast carcinosarcoma: A SEER population-based study.

OBJECTIVES: Carcinosarcoma of the breast is a rare disease. Its clinicopathological features and prognosis are not well defined. The aim of this study was to compare the clinicopathological features and clinical outcome between breast carcinosarcoma and breast invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with breast carcinosarcoma and breast IDC were identified through the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database from 2010 to 2015. Then a comparison was conducted between these two groups. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance the effects of baseline clinicopathological differences. The Cox proportional hazard model was used to identify potential prognostic factors of breast carcinosarcoma. RESULTS: In total, we identified 63 patients with breast carcinosarcoma and 200,596 cases with breast IDC. Comparing with IDC, breast carcinosarcoma was significantly correlated with higher grading, higher staging, larger tumor size, lower lymph node involvement, and a higher proportion of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), suggesting a significantly worse clinical outcome. After adjusting for the uneven clinicopathological variables with PSM, significant differences were still observed between these two histology types. Subgroup analysis further showed that carcinosarcoma-TNBC has an inferior clinical outcome compared with IDC-TNBC. Finally, we identified independent prognostic factors, namely, stage, tumor size, and distant metastasis. CONCLUSION: It is concluded that breast carcinosarcoma has distinct clinicopathological features and a significantly worse clinical outcome than common IDC.

Genomics of gynaecological carcinosarcomas and future treatment options.

Gynaecological carcinosarcomas are the most lethal gynaecological malignancies that are often highly resistant to standard chemotherapy. They are composed of both carcinomatous and sarcomatous components and are associated with high rates of metastatic disease. Due to their rarity, molecular studies have been carried out on relatively few tumours, revealing a broad spectrum of heterogeneity. In this review, we have collated the gene mutations, gene expression, epigenetic regulation and protein expression reported by a number of studies on gynaecological carcinosarcomas. Based on these results, we describe potential therapeutics that may demonstrate efficacy and present any pre-clinical studies that have been carried out. We also describe the pre-clinical models currently available for future research to assess the potential of molecularly matched therapies. Interestingly, over-expression of many biomarkers in carcinosarcoma tumours often doesn't correlate with a worse prognosis. Therefore, we propose that profiling the mutational landscape, gene expression, and gene amplification/deletion may better indicate potential treatment strategies and predict response, thus improving outcomes for women with this rare, aggressive disease.

Prognostic significance of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in uterine carcinosarcoma.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical and prognostic importance of programmed death-1 (PD-1) and/ or programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS). STUDY DESIGN: Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples from 59 cases with UCS were analyzed. PD-1 and PD-L1 expressions in tumor tissue and microenvironment were detected by immunohistochemistry. Clinical and pathological characteristics including age, stage, initial symptom, surgical approach, myometrial invasion, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI), lymph node invasion, adjuvant therapy, and survival were evaluated. The Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare the outcomes and prognostic factors. RESULTS: PD-1 expression in tumor tissue and microenvironment was detected in 15 (25 %) and 18 (30 %) cases, respectively. PD-L1 expression in tumor tissue and microenvironment was detected in 15 (25 %) and 12 cases (20 %), respectively. PD-L1 expression in tumor was associated with longer survival and median survival was 38 and 15 months in cases with and without PD-L1 expressions, respectively (p = 0.019). Lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) (p = 0.014), myometrial invasion (p = 0.008) and PD-L1 expression were found to be prognostic for UCS's. PD-L1 expression was found to be an independent good prognostic factor with Cox regression analysis (OR 3.9; 95 % CI: 1.4-11.0) for overall survival. CONCLUSION: PD-1 and/or PD-L1 expression are important due to their expressions in one fourth of the cases with UCS and PD-1/PD-L1 blockade may be a new avenue in UCS.

The oncological safety of hysteroscopy in the diagnosis of early-stage endometrial cancer: An Israel gynecologic oncology group study.

OBJECTIVE: To compare survival measures of women with early-stage endometrial cancer who underwent either hysteroscopy or a non-hysteroscopic procedure as a diagnostic procedure. STUDY DESIGN: An Israel Gynecologic Oncology Group multicenter study of 1324 patients with stage I endometrial cancer who underwent surgery between 2002 and 2014. Patients were divided into two groups: hysteroscopy and non-hysteroscopy (curettage or office endometrial biopsy). Clinical, pathological, and survival measures were compared between the groups. RESULTS: There were 355 patients in the hysteroscopy group and 969 patients in the non-hysteroscopy group. The median follow-up was 52 months (range 12-120 months). There were no differences between the groups in the 5-year recurrence-free survival (90.2% vs. 88.2%; p = 0.53), disease-specific survival (93.4% vs. 91.7%; p = 0.5), and overall survival (86.2% vs. 80.6%; p = 0.22). CONCLUSION: Our findings affirm that hysteroscopy does not compromise the survival of patients with early-stage endometrial cancer.

Sarcomatoid carcinoma presenting as cancers of unknown primary: a clinicopathological portrait.

BACKGROUND: Sarcomatoid carcinoma of unknown primary (SCUP) is a rare entity of either poorly differentiated carcinoma with sarcoma-like differentiation or a true mixed lineage neoplasm. Limited data regarding clinicopathological profile and management exists. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the MD Anderson Cancer of Unknown Primary database and tumor registry to identify 48 SCUP patients between 2001 and 2017. Patient characteristics, pathology, molecular diagnostics, treatments, and outcomes were obtained. Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate overall survival (OS) and compared using log rank test. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 59 years (range 27-86). Majority of patients were female (58%) and presented with ≥3 metastatic sites (52%), commonly lymph node (50%), bone (42%), lung (27%), and liver (21%). First line treatment included chemotherapy (35%), surgery (27%), and radiation (24%). Gemcitabine and docetaxel (18%) was the most common chemotherapy regimen. Median OS for entire cohort was 11 months (95% CI: 5.6 to 16.4). Poor performance status (PS), > 1 metastatic site, elevated lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), and high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were significantly associated with worse OS on univariate analyses. On multivariate analyses, poor PS (HR 8.7; 95%CI: 3.0-25.0; p <  0.001) and high NLR (HR 3.4; 95%CI: 1.3-8.8; p = 0.011) emerged as independent prognostic factors for OS. CONCLUSIONS: SCUP is a rare presentation with an aggressive clinical course and limited survival. Diagnosis is difficult to make and requires careful review and synthesis of histology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular diagnostics. Chemotherapy resistance remains a challenge. Early mutational profiling is warranted, and clinical trial participation should be encouraged for this subset.