Interventions addressing maternal and child health among the urban poor and homeless: an overview of systematic reviews.

BACKGROUND: Inequalities in access to and utilization of maternal and child health (MCH) care are hampering progress on the path to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. In a number of Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) population subgroups at disproportionate risk of being left behind are the urban poor. Within this neglected group is the further neglected group of the homeless. Concomitantly, a number of interventions from the antenatal period onward have been piloted, tested, and scaled in these contexts. We carried out an overview of systematic reviews (SRs) to characterize the evidence around maternal and child health interventions relevant to urban poor homeless populations in LMICs. METHODS: We searched Medline, Cochrane Library, Health Systems Evidence and EBSCOhost databases for SRs published between January 2009 and 2020 (with an updated search through November 2021). Our population of interest was women or children from urban poor settings in LMICs; interventions and outcomes corresponded with the World Health Organization's (WHO) guidance document. Each SR was assessed by two reviewers using established standard critical appraisal checklists. The overview was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021229107). RESULTS: In a sample of 33 high quality SRs, we found no direct relevant evidence for pregnant and lactating homeless women (and children) in the reviewed literature. There was a lack of emphasis on evidence related to family planning, safe abortion care, and postpartum care of mothers. There was mixed quality evidence that the range of nutritional interventions had little, unclear or no effect on several child mortality and development outcomes. Interventions related to water, sanitation, and hygiene, ensuring acceptability of community health services and health promotion type programs could be regarded as beneficial, although location seemed to matter. Importantly, the risk of bias reporting in different reviews did not match, suggesting that greater attention to rigour in their conduct is needed. CONCLUSION: The generalizability of existing systematic reviews to our population of interest was poor. There is a clear need for rigorous primary research on MCH interventions among urban poor, and particularly homeless populations in LMICs, as it is as yet unclear whether the same, augmented, or altogether different interventions would be required.

Mapping of Pediatric COVID-19 Cases in Miami-Dade and Broward Counties: an Analysis of Sociodemographic Disparities.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have shown a disproportionate impact of COVID-19 infection on Black and Hispanic Americans in the adult patient population. However, few studies have been done with pediatric populations. The aim of this study is to identify the prevalence and distribution of COVID-19 cases among pediatric patients in Miami-Dade and Broward counties and identify any sociodemographic disparities. METHODS: A total of 10,087 children/adolescents ages zero years-old to 20 years-old were tested from July 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020. ArcGIS was used to map cases and obtain sociodemographic data. SPSS software was used to determine significance of data trends and create a predictive model. RESULTS: There were 1,161 pediatric COVID-19 cases detected. White Hispanics and Black Hispanics had statically significantly higher cases when compared to White non-Hispanics and Black non-Hispanics. Percentage of households on food stamps, percentage of households below the poverty line, percentage of minority populations, and percentage of Hispanic population showed a positive correlation with detected pediatric COVID-19 cases. Alternatively, areas with higher median household incomes and higher educational status were negatively correlated with COVID-19. Percentage of Hispanic population and percentage of households below the poverty line were predictive of pediatric COVID-19 cases. CONCLUSION: There was a disproportionate impact of pediatric COVID-19 infection on zip codes of lower socioeconomic status and increased racial/ethnic minority populations. This study demonstrates the need for public health policies that prioritize testing children/adolescents in these communities.

Mediation of the parental education gradient in early adult mortality by childhood adversity: a population-based cohort study of more than 1 million children.

BACKGROUND: Children born into disadvantaged socioeconomic circumstances are more likely to experience both adversity during childhood and premature mortality. The aim of this study was to investigate how much of the parental education gradient in early adult mortality is explained by exposure to childhood adversity. METHODS: We used data from the nationwide register-based Danish Life Course cohort study. Our sample consisted of all individuals born between Jan 1, 1980, and Dec 31, 2001, who did not emigrate or die before age 16 years, and for whom information on parental education level was available. These individuals were followed up for mortality from age 16 years until Dec 31, 2018. Highest attained parental education level at birth was divided into low (≤9 years), medium (10-12 years), and high (>12 years) according to years in education. Individuals were assigned to one of five childhood adversity trajectory groups based on their annual exposure between age 0 and 16 years to a broad selection of adversities in three dimensions: material deprivation, loss or threat of loss in the family, and family dynamics. Childhood abuse was not included. The association between parental education level and mortality was assessed with a Cox proportional hazards model. To assess the magnitude of mediation of this association by childhood adversity, we used counterfactual mediation analysis and an Aalen additive hazards model. Analyses were unadjusted and adjusted for parental origin and parental ages at birth. FINDINGS: Our sample consisted of 1 278 156 individuals followed up from birth until age 16-38 years. The sample comprised 655 633 (51·3%) men and 622 523 (48·7%) women, and 1 243 981 (97·3%) participants were of European descent. During follow-up, 5387 deaths were registered. Compared with the high parental education group, we calculated a total effect equal to 8·7 additional deaths (95% CI 6·6-10·9) per 100 000 person-years in the medium parental education group and 31·9 (28·5 to 35·2) per 100 000 person-years in the low parental education group. Mediation through childhood adversity trajectories accounted for 41·5% (95% CI 8·0-67·5) of the additional deaths in the medium parental education group and 46·4% (32·9-58·8) of the additional deaths in the low parental education group. The results were similar when adjusting the analyses for sociodemographic factors. INTERPRETATION: The experience of childhood adversity seems to be an important mediator of the association between parental education and mortality in early adulthood. Interventions reducing the exposure to childhood adversity might thus reduce the parental education gradient in early adult mortality. FUNDING: Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development.