Evaluation of inflammatory biomarkers affecting mortality in acute cholecystitis in the emergency department.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of pan-immune inflammation value (PIV), systemic immune-inflammatory index (SII), and systemic inflammation response index (SIRI) in predicting mortality in acute cholecystitis (AC). BACKGROUND: Abdominal pain is one of the most frequent complaints encountered by physicians at emergency department (ED). METHODS: This clinical study is a cross-sectional study among patients admitted to the emergency department of a tertiary hospital and diagnosed with AC. Total survival curves were estimated by the Kaplan‒Meier method. Differences according to risk groups were determined by the log-rank test. RESULTS: A total of 789 patients (survival: 737, non-survival: 52) diagnosed with AC were enrolled in the study. NLR and SII had an excellent diagnostic power in predicting 30-day mortality in the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis, while the diagnostic power of SIRI and PIV was acceptable. It was observed that the probability of survival period decreased in the presence of NLR (>11.07), SII (>2315.18), SIRI (>6.55), and PIV (>1581.13) above the cut-off levels. The HRs of NLR, SII, SIRI, and PIV were 10.52, 7.44, 6.34, and 5.6, respectively. CONCLUSION: NLR, SII, SIRI, and PIV may be useful markers in predicting 30-day mortality in patients with AC (Tab. 3, Fig. 5, Ref. 25).

Comprehensive assessment of the management of acute cholecystitis in Scotland: population-wide cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis is one of the most common diagnoses presenting to emergency general surgery and is managed either operatively or conservatively. However, operative rates vary widely across the world. This real-world population analysis aimed to describe the current clinical management and outcomes of patients with acute cholecystitis across Scotland, UK. METHODS: This was a national cohort study using data obtained from Information Services Division, Scotland. All adult patients with the admission diagnostic code for acute cholecystitis were included. Data were used to identify all patients admitted to Scottish hospitals between 1997 and 2019 and outcomes tracked for inpatients or after discharge through the unique patient identifier. This was linked to death data, including date of death. RESULTS: A total of 47 558 patients were diagnosed with 58 824 episodes of acute cholecystitis (with 27.2 per cent of patients experiencing more than one episode) in 46 Scottish hospitals. Median age was 58 years (interquartile range (i.q.r.) 43-71), 64.4 per cent were female, and most (76.1 per cent) had no comorbidities. A total of 28 741 (60.4 per cent) patients had an operative intervention during the index admission. Patients who had an operation during their index admission had a lower risk of 90-day mortality compared with non-operative management (OR 0.62, 95% c.i. 0.55-0.70). CONCLUSION: In this study, 60 per cent of patients had an index cholecystectomy. Patients who underwent surgery had a better survival rate compared with those managed conservatively, further advocating for an operative approach in this cohort.

Open Cholecystostomy Under Local Anesthesia for Acute Cholecystitis in the Elderly and High-Risk Surgical Patients.

BACKGROUND: The morbidity and mortality rates associated with cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis are higher in the critically ill elderly population. As an alternative to cholecystectomy, we report the results of treatment of acute cholecystitis in the elderly after open cholecystolithotomy with cholecystostomy tube placement under local anesthesia. METHODS: A case series was performed on 5 patients from August 2007 to April 2010 who presented with acute cholecystitis and underwent an open cholecystolithotomy and tube placement. Thirty-day mortality, intra- and immediate-postoperative complications, clinical improvement after drainage, additional biliary procedures needed, and outcome after cholecystostomy tube removal were recorded. RESULTS: Open cholecystolithotomy and tube placement were performed successfully in all patients and permitted resolution of the acute attack in all after a mean period of 3.75 days. Thirty-day mortality was 0%. Patients did not experience any intraoperative complications. We observed 100% rate of successful short-term outcomes in our patients including resolution pain, and objectively, normalization of leukocytosis, and defervescence. None of the patients required emergency cholecystectomy. All patients had their cholecystostomy tubes removed at a mean postoperative day 27. There were no cases of biliary leakage or tube dislodgement. There were no recurrences of acute cholecystitis within the mean follow-up of 20.75 months. DISCUSSION: Emergency open cholecystolithotomy and cholecystostomy tube placement represent an effective, safe, and definitive alternative treatment strategy for acute gallstone cholecystitis in selected elderly patients with a mortality rate of 0% in the authors' experience.

The early prediction of mortality in acute cholecystitis: Temperature, Neutrophils and Multiple organ failure (TNM) score.

OBJECTIVE: Acute Cholecystitis (AC) accounts for a significant proportion of patients presenting to the Emergency Department with abdominal pain. We suggest grading the severity of AC with a simple system: TNM, an acronym borrowed by cancer staging where T indicated Temperature, N neutrophils and M Multiple organ failure. This retrospective-prospective observational study evaluates the predictive value of TNM score on mortality of patients with AC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: TNM was developed in a training cohort of 178 patients with AC who underwent cholecystectomy from February 2005 to December 2012 (retrospectives data). To verify the prognostic value of TNM score, we prospectively recruited 172 patients who were consecutively included and treated from January 2013 to July 2020 as the validation cohort. After defining the categories T, N and M, patients were grouped in stages. The variables analyzed were age, sex, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, blood transfusion, temperature, neutrophils count, preoperative organ failure, immune-compromised status, stage. RESULTS: In the training cohort TNM staging was: none patient at stage 0; 6 patients at stage I; 71 patients at stage II; 71 patients at stage III; 30 patients at stage IV. Death occurred in 51 patients. ASA score, neutrophils count, preoperative organ failure, stage III-IV emerged as statistically significant different prognostic factors. ASA score (III-IV) and stage (III-IV) were significant independent predictors of post-operative mortality in multivariate analysis. Comparable results were observed in the validation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: TNM classification is very easy to use; it helps to define the mortality risk and it is useful to objectively compare patients with AC.

Mortality risk estimation in acute calculous cholecystitis: beyond the Tokyo Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) is the second most frequent surgical condition in emergency departments. The recommended treatment is the early laparoscopic cholecystectomy; however, the Tokyo Guidelines (TG) advocate for different initial treatments in some subgroups of patients without a strong evidence that all patients will benefit from them. There is no clear consensus in the literature about who is the unfit patient for surgical treatment. The primary aim of the study is to identify the risk factors for mortality in ACC and compare them with Tokyo Guidelines (TG) classification. METHODS: Retrospective unicentric cohort study of patients emergently admitted with and ACC during 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2016. The study comprised 963 patients. Primary outcome was the mortality after the diagnosis. A propensity score method was used to avoid confounding factors comparing surgical treatment and non-surgical treatment. RESULTS: The overall mortality was 3.6%. Mortality was associated with older age (68 + IQR 27 vs. 83 + IQR 5.5; P = 0.001) and higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (3.5 + 5.3 vs. 0+2; P = 0.001). A logistic regression model isolated four mortality risk factors (ACME): chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 4.66 95% CI 1.7-12.8 P = 0.001), dementia (OR 4.12; 95% CI 1.34-12.7, P = 0.001), age > 80 years (OR 1.12: 95% CI 1.02-1.21, P = 0.001) and the need of preoperative vasoactive amines (OR 9.9: 95% CI 3.5-28.3, P = 0.001) which predicted the mortality in a 92% of the patients. The receiver operating characteristic curve yielded an area of 88% significantly higher that 68% (P = 0.003) from the TG classification. When comparing subgroups selected using propensity score matching with the same morbidity and severity of ACC, mortality was higher in the non-surgical treatment group. (26.2% vs. 10.5%). CONCLUSIONS: Mortality was higher in ACC patients treated with non-surgical treatment. ACME identifies high-risk patients. The validation to ACME with a prospective multicenter study population could allow us to create a new alternative guideline to TG for treating ACC. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Retrospectively registered and recorded in Clinical Trials. NCT04744441.

Management of acute cholecystitis in elderly patients: A propensity score-matched analysis of surgical vs. medical treatment.

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis (AC) is a life-threatening emergency in elderly patients. AIMS: To compare the commonly used management strategies for elderly patients with AC as well as resulting morbidity, mortality and length of hospital stay (LOS). METHODS: All patients ≥ 65 years admitted to our emergency department for AC between January 1st, 2014 and December 31st, 2018 were included in the study. We compared patients that received medical treatment to patients who received operative procedures. In order to correct for baseline covariates and factors associated to clinical management, we used a 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) analysis. The primary outcome was the overall in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcomes included occurrence of major complications and LOS. RESULTS: A total of 1075 patients were enrolled: 483 patients received a medical treatment and 592 patients underwent interventional procedures. After PSM, 770 patients (385 for each treatment group) were included in the analysis. The analysis revealed that both mortality and cumulative major complications were similar in medical and interventional group. We found that among comorbidities, Charlson comorbidity index and congestive heart failure were significantly higher in the medical treatment group (5 [4-6] vs. 4 [3-6] and 11.7% vs. 4.7%, respectively; p<0.001). LOS was slightly lower in the medical treatment group (7.0 days [4.9-11.1] vs. 7.9 [4.9-13.5]; p = 0.046). CONCLUSION: Medical management outcomes for AC in elderly patients were similar to operative treatments in terms of mortality and cumulative major complications. A conservative approach should always be considered.

Postoperative Outcomes after Index vs Interval Cholecystectomy for Perforated Cholecystitis.

BACKGROUND: Gallbladder perforation is a known morbid sequela of acute cholecystitis, yet evidence for its optimal management remains conflicting. This study compares outcomes in patients with perforated cholecystitis who underwent cholecystectomy at the time of index hospital admission with those in patients who underwent interval cholecystectomy. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was conducted of 654 patients from the American College of Surgeons NSQIP database who underwent cholecystectomy for perforated cholecystitis (2006-2018). Primary outcomes were 30-day postoperative major and minor morbidity, 30-day mortality, and need for prolonged hospitalization. Patient and procedure characteristics and outcomes were compared using Mann-Whitney rank sum test for continuous variables and Pearson chi-square tests for categorical variables. A subset analysis was conducted of patients matched on propensity for undergoing interval cholecystectomy. RESULTS: The 30-day postoperative mortality rate of matched cohort patients undergoing index cholecystectomy was 7% vs 0% of patients undergoing interval cholecystectomy (p = 0.01). The 30-day minor morbidity rates were 2% for index and 8% for interval patients (p = 0.06), and the major morbidity rates were 33% for index and 14% for interval patients (p = 0.003). Of the index patients, 27% required prolonged hospitalization compared with 6% of interval patients (p < 0.001). Results showed similar trends in the unmatched analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Patients who underwent index cholecystectomy had significantly longer postoperative hospitalizations and higher 30-day postoperative major morbidity and mortality. There were no differences in 30-day minor morbidity. Selected patients with perforated cholecystitis can benefit from operative management on an interval, rather than urgent, basis.

Outcomes Following an Index Emergency Admission With Cholecystitis: A National Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the differences between patients who undergo cholecystectomy following index admission for cholecystitis, and those who are managed nonoperatively. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Index emergency cholecystectomy following acute cholecystitis is widely recommended by national guidelines, but its effect on clinical outcomes remains uncertain. METHODS: Data collected routinely from the Hospital Episode Statistics database (all admissions to National Health Service organizations in England and Wales) were extracted between April 1, 2002 and March 31, 2015. Analyses were limited to patients aged over 18 years with a primary diagnosis of cholecystitis. Exclusions included records with missing or invalid datasets, patients who had previously undergone a cholecystectomy, patients who had died without a cholecystectomy, and those undergoing cholecystectomy for malignancy, pancreatitis, or choledocholithiasis. Patients were grouped as either "no cholecystectomy" where they had never undergone a cholecystectomy following discharge, or "cholecystectomy." The latter group was then subdivided as "emergency cholecystectomy" when cholecystectomy was performed during their index emergency admission, or "interval cholecystectomy" when a cholecystectomy was performed within 12 months following a subsequent (emergency or elective) admission. Propensity Score Matching was used to match emergency and interval cholecystectomy groups. Main outcome measures included 1) One-year total length of hospital stay due to biliary causes following an index emergency admission with cholecystitis. 2) One-year mortality; defined as death occurring within 1 year following the index emergency admission with acute cholecystitis. RESULTS: Of the 99,139 patients admitted as an emergency with acute cholecystitis, 51.1% (47,626) did not undergo a cholecystectomy within 1 year of index admission. These patients were older, with more comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Score ≥ 5 in 23.5% vs. 8.1%, P < 0.001) when compared to patients who did have a cholecystectomy. While all-cause 1-year mortality was higher in the nonoperated versus the operated group (12.2% vs. 2.0%, P < 0.001), gallbladder-related deaths were significantly lower than all other causes of death in the non-operated group (3.3% vs. 8.9%, P < 0.001). Following matching, 1-year total hospital admission time was significantly higher following emergency compared with interval cholecystectomy (17.7 d vs. 13 d, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Over 50% of patients in England did not undergo cholecystectomy following index admission for acute cholecystitis. Mortality was higher in the nonoperated group, which was mostly due to non-gallbladder pathologies but total hospital admission time for biliary causes was lower over 12 months. Increasing the numbers of emergency cholecystectomy may risk over-treating patients with acute cholecystitis and increasing their time spent admitted to hospital.

Risk Prediction in Acute Calculous Cholecystitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prognostic Factors and Predictive Models.

Background: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the main treatment of acute cholecystitis. Although considered relatively safe, it carries 6%-9% risk of major complications and 0.1%-1% risk of mortality. There is no consensus regarding the evaluation of the preoperative risks, and the management of patients with acute cholecystitis is usually guided by surgeon's personal preferences. We assessed the best method to identify patients with acute cholecystitis who are at high risk of complications and mortality. Methods: We performed a systematic review of studies that reported the preoperative prediction of outcomes in people with acute cholecystitis. We searched the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, WHO ICTRP, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Science Citation Index Expanded until April 27, 2019. We performed a meta-analysis when possible. Results: Six thousand eight hundred twenty-seven people were included in one or more analyses in 12 studies. Tokyo guidelines 2013 (TG13) predicted mortality (two studies; Grade 3 versus Grade 1: odds ratio [OR] 5.08, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.79-9.26). Gender predicted conversion to open cholecystectomy (two studies; OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.06-2.39). None of the factors reported in at least two studies had significant predictive ability of major or minor complications. Conclusion: There is significant uncertainty in the ability of prognostic factors and risk prediction models in predicting outcomes in people with acute calculous cholecystitis. Based on studies of high risk of bias, TG13 Grade 3 severity may be associated with greater mortality than Grade 1. Early referral of such patients to high-volume specialist centers should be considered. Further well-designed prospective studies are necessary.

Characteristics and outcome of elderly patients admitted for acute Cholecystitis to medical or surgical wards.

BACKGROUND: Elderly patients admitted because of acute cholecystitis are usually not operated during their initial admission and receive conservative treatment. To help formulate a new admission policy regarding elderly patients with acute cholecystitis we compared the demographic and clinical characteristics and outcome of patients > 65 with acute cholecystitis admitted to medical or surgical wards. METHODS: This retrospective study included all patients > 65 years admitted for acute cholecystitis between January, 2009 and September, 2016. Data were retrieved from the electronic health records. RESULTS: A total of 187 patients were detected, 54 (29%) in medical departments and 133 (71%) in surgical wards. The mean age (±SD) was 80 ± 7.5 and was higher among those in medical than surgical wards (84 ± 7 versus 79 ± 7, p <  0.05). Patients hospitalized in medical departments had more comorbidity, disability and mental impairment. However, there was no difference in mortality between the two groups, 1 (2%) and 6 (4%) respectively. Independent predictors for hospitalization in medical departments were chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR = 9.8, 95% C. I 1.6-59) and the Norton Scale score (NSS)(OR = 0.7, 95% C. I 0.7-0.8). Impaired mental condition was the only predictor for hospitalization > 1 week. The strongest predictor for having cholecystostomy was admission to the surgical department (OR = 14.7, 95% C. I 3.9-56.7). Linear regression showed a negative correlation between NSS and length of hospitalization (LOH; Beta = - 0.5). CONCLUSION: Elderly patients with acute cholecystitis who require conservative management, especially those with severe functional and mental impairment can be safely hospitalized in medical departments. Outcome was not inferior in terms of mortality and LOH. These results have practical policy implications for the placement of elderly patients with acute cholecystitis in medical rather than surgical departments.

Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in aged acute calculous cholecystitis: a cohort study.

BACKGROUND: In elderly patients with calculous acute cholecystitis, the risk of emergency surgery is high, and percutaneous cholecystostomy tube drainage (PC) combined with delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy (DLC) may be a good choice. We retrospectively compared laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to DLC after PC to determine which is the better treatment strategy. METHOD: We performed a retrospective cohort analysis of 752 patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. Patients with the following conditions were included: (1) age > 65 years old; (2) patients with a grade 2 or 3 severity of cholecystitis according to the 2013 Tokyo Guidelines (TG13); (3) the surgeons who performed the LC were professors or associate professors and (4) the DLC was performed in our hospital after PC. Patients who missed their 30-day follow-up; were diagnosed with bile duct stones, cholangitis or gallstone pancreatitis or were pregnant were excluded from the study. A total of 51 of 314 patients who underwent LC and 73 of 438 patients who underwent PC + DLC were assessed. PC + DLC and LC patients were matched by cholecystitis severity grade according to the TG13, and the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) calculator was used to predict mortality (n = 21/group). Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were analysed. RESULTS: Compared to the matched LC group, the DLC group had less intraoperative bleeding (42.2 vs 75.3 mL, p = 0.014), shorter hospital stays (4.9 vs 7.4 days, p = 0.010) and lower rates of type A bile duct injury (4.8% vs 14.3%, p = 0.035) and type D (0 vs 9.5%, p = 0.002) according to Strasberg classification, residual stones (4.8 vs 14.3%, p = 0.035) and gastrointestinal organ injury (0 vs 3.6%, p < 0.001). Patients in the DLC group had lower incidences of ICU admission and death and a significantly lower incidence of repeat surgery. CONCLUSION: In elderly patients treated for acute calculous cholecystitis, the 30-day mortality and complication rates were lower for PC + DLC than for LC. However, the total hospitalisation time was significantly prolonged and the costs were significantly higher for PC + DLC.

APACHE IV Score is Useful For Assessment and Stratification of Elderly Patients Over 65 Years With Acute Cholecystitis.

PURPOSE: One of the main problems concerning the design of clinical trials in critically ill patients with acute cholecystitis (AC) is the lack of validated, well-established scoring systems to stratify the severity of patient disease states. The aim of this study was to evaluate the performance of the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation IV (APACHE IV) scoring system in patients over 65 years with AC. METHODS: All patients over 65 years of age admitted to our hospital for treatment of AC in the intensive care unit between January 2013 and January 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 443 consecutive patients with AC were enrolled in this study. As for the patients over 65 years, the survivors had lower APACHE IV scores and lower risk of death than nonsurvivors (P<0.01). The discrimination of the APACHE IV score prediction was good, with an area under the curve of 0.850 (95% confidence interval, 0.780-0.932). The APACHE IV models were well-calibrated with the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test (P=0.635). Similar results were obtained for patients over 85 years of age. CONCLUSION: The APACHE IV model was good at predicting hospital mortality in elderly patients with AC, which would be helpful to make clinical and therapeutic decisions in the future.

Surgical management of acute cholecystitis in a nationwide Danish cohort.

PURPOSE: In the Danish national guidelines from 2006 on the treatment of acute cholecystitis, early laparoscopic operation within 5 days after the debut of symptoms was recommended. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcome in patients with acute cholecystitis subjected to cholecystectomy in Denmark in the five-year period hereafter. METHODS: All patients undergoing cholecystectomy in the period 2006-2010 were registered in the Danish Cholecystectomy Database, from which outcome data were collected. The effect of potential risk factors such as age, gender, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, previous pancreatitis, previous abdominal surgery, year of operation, surgical approach, and surgeon experience was analyzed. RESULTS: Of 33,853 patients registered with a cholecystectomy, 4667 (14%) were operated for acute cholecystitis. In 95% of the patients, laparoscopic cholecystectomy was intended and in 5% primary open access was chosen. The frequency of conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery was 18%. High age and ASA score, operation in the early years of the period, and open or converted procedure all increased the risk of hospital stay to > 3 days or readmission. High age and ASA score, converted or open operation, and previous pancreatitis increased the risk of additional procedures. Postoperative mortality was 1.2%, and significant risk factors for postoperative death were age, low BMI, high ASA score, early year of operation, and open procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Acute cholecystectomy was safely managed laparoscopically in most patients after the introduction of national guidelines, with an increasing rate of laparoscopically completed procedures during the study period.

[A retrospective analysis of clinical characteristics and mortality risks in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis and cholangitis].

Objective: To analyze the clinical characteristics and explore the risk predictors on mortality in elderly patients with acute cholecystitis and cholangitis. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis of elderly patients hospitalized in the Second Medical Center of General Liberation Army Hospital for acute cholecystitis and cholangitis during 2000 to 2018. Clinical data and risk predictors on mortality were assessed. The patients were stratified into three groups based on age:Ⅰ (65-74 years old),Ⅱ (75-84 years old), and Ⅲ (≥85 years old). Logistic regression analysis was used to identify the predictors of mortality. Results: A total of 574 patients were finally enrolled with the mean age 87.6 years including 191 in group Ⅰ, 167 in group Ⅱ, and 216 in group Ⅲ. The main cause of acute cholecystitis and cholangitis was gallstone (76.3%),and the main symptom was abdominal pain (62.9%),followed by chills(62.5%),fever(59.8%),jaundice (47.2%) and septic shock(26.3%). Cholecystitis was the most common diagnosis in groups Ⅰ and Ⅱ,whereas it was cholangitis in group Ⅲ. Percutaneous transhepatic biliary/gallbladder drainage (PTBD/PTGD) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) were administrated more frequently in groups Ⅲ. A total of 35 patients (6.1%) died during follow-up. Senior in age (OR=11.1),the Charlson comorbidity index (OR=19.5),cancers (OR=9.6),blood stream infections (OR=7.4),severity of cholecystitis and cholangitis (OR=4.2) were risk factors associated with mortality. Conclusions: Even in the elderly patients with acute cholecystitis and cholangitis,comorbidity is one of the main factors affecting clinical outcomes. Due to the poor performance, this group of population presents more severe disease and undergoes conservative treatment strategies.

The impact of delayed source control and antimicrobial therapy in 196 patients with cholecystitis-associated septic shock: a cohort analysis

Background: Cholecystitis-associated septic shock carries a significant mortality. Our aim was to determine whether timing of source control affects survival in cholecystitis patients with septic shock. Methods: We conducted a nested cohort study of all patients with cholecystitis-associated septic shock from an international, multicentre database (1996­2015). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine associations between clinical factors and in-hospital mortality. The results were used to inform a classification and regression tree (CART) analysis that modelled the association between disease severity (APACHE II), time to source control and survival. Results: Among 196 patients with cholecystitis-associated septic shock, overall mortality was 37%. Compared with nonsurvivors (n = 72), survivors (n = 124) had lower mean admission APACHE II scores (21 v. 27, p < 0.001) and lower median admission serum lactate (2.4 v. 6.8 µmol/L, p < 0.001). Survivors were more likely to receive appropriate antimicrobial therapy earlier (median 2.8 v. 6.1 h from shock, p = 0.012). Survivors were also more likely to undergo successful source control earlier (median 9.8 v. 24.7 h from shock, p < 0.001). Adjusting for covariates, APACHE II (odds ratio [OR] 1.13, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06­1.21 per increment) and delayed source control > 16 h (OR 4.45, 95% CI 1.88­10.70) were independently associated with increased mortality (all p < 0.001). The CART analysis showed that patients with APACHE II scores of 15­26 benefitted most from source control within 16 h (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: In patients with cholecystitis-associated septic shock, admission APACHE II score and delay in source control (cholecystectomy or percutaneous cholecystostomy drainage) significantly affected hospital outcomes.

Contexte: Le choc septique associé à une cholécystite s'accompagne d'une mortalité significative. Notre but était de déterminer si le moment du contrôle de la source affecte la survie chez les patients atteints de cholécystite qui se trouvent en choc septique. Méthodes: Nous avons procédé à une étude de cohorte nichée regroupant tous les patients ayant présenté un choc septique associé à une cholécystite à partir d'une base de données multicentrique internationale (1996­2015). La régression logistique multivariée a été utilisée pour déterminer les liens entre les facteurs cliniques et la mortalité perhospitalière. Les résultats ont été utilisés pour éclairer une analyse par arbre de classification (CART) qui modélisait le lien entre la gravité de la maladie (APACHE II), le temps nécessaire au contrôle de la source et la survie. Résultats: Parmi 196 patients souffrant d'un choc septique associé à une cholécystite, la mortalité globale a été de 37 %. Comparativement aux patients décédés (n = 72), les survivants (n = 124) présentaient à l'admission des scores APACHE II moyens plus bas (21 c. 27, p < 0,001) et un taux de lactate sérique médian plus bas (2,4 c. 6,8 µmol/L, p < 0,001). Les survivants étaient plus susceptibles de recevoir une antibiothérapie adéquate plus hâtive (médiane 2,8 c. 6,1 h suivant le choc, p = 0,012). Les survivants étaient aussi plus susceptibles de bénéficier plus hâtivement d'un contrôle réussi de la source (médiane 9,8 c. 24,7 h suivant le choc, p < 0,001). L'ajustement pour tenir compte des covariables du score APACHE II (rapport des cotes [RC] 1,13, intervalle de confiance [IC] de 95 % 1,06­1,21 par palier) et le retard du contrôle de la source > 16 h (RC 4,45, IC de 95 % 1,88­10,70) ont été associés indépendamment à une mortalité plus élevée (tous deux p < 0,001). L'analyse CART a révélé que les patients ayant des scores APACHE II de 15­26 ont le plus bénéficié d'un contrôle de la source dans les 16 h (p < 0,0001). Conclusion: Chez les patients présentant un choc septique associé à une cholécystite, le score APACHE II à l'admission et le retard de contrôle de la source (cholécystectomie ou drainage par cholécystotomie percutanée) ont significativement influé sur les résultats hospitaliers.

Place for elective cholecystectomy for patients with severe thalassaemia: a retrospective case control study.

OBJECTIVE: At present, cholecystectomy is carried out for thalassaemia patients with gall stone disease only if they develop symptoms of cholecystitis, except in the rare instance where an un-inflammed gall bladder is removed simultaneously with splenectomy. We carried out this retrospective analysis of case records to examine if patients with thalassaemia have a higher rate of peri operative complications compared to non-thalassaemics with gall stone disease, warranting a change of policy to justify elective cholecystectomy. RESULTS: Case records of 540 patients with thalassaemia were retrospectively analysed of which 98 were found to have gallstones. Records of 62 patients without thalassaemia with gall stone disease too were used for comparison. 19 of patients with thalassaemia and 52 of non-thalassaemic who had gallstones had undergone cholecystectomy. In all but 5 patients with thalassaemia cholecystectomy was done following attacks of acute cholecystitis as was the case in the non-thalassaemic controls. A significantly higher proportion of early and late complications had occurred in thalassaemia patients compared to non-thalassaemic patients post operatively. Six deaths related to sepsis following acute cholecystitis in the peri operative period were reported among 19 thalassaemia patients whereas no deaths were reported among 55 non-thalassaemic patients who underwent cholecystectomy for gallstones.

Acute Cholecystitis in Elderly Patients after Hip Fracture: a Nationwide Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Because acute cholecystitis in elderly hip fracture is not easily distinguishable from other gastrointestinal symptoms and involves atypical clinical behaviors, it may not be diagnosed in the early stage. However, the exact incidences could not be reported. We utilized data from a nationwide claims database and attempted to assess the incidence of acute cholecystitis in elderly hip fracture patients and how cholecystitis affects mortality rates after hip fracture. METHODS: Study subjects were from the Korean National Health Insurance Service-Senior cohort. From a population of approximately 5.5 million Korean enrollees > 60 years of age in 2002, a total of 588,147 participants were randomly selected using 10% simple random sampling. The subjects included in this study were those who were over 65 years old and underwent surgery for hip fractures. RESULTS: A total of 15,210 patients were enrolled in the cohort as hip fracture patients. There were 7,888 cases (51.9%) of femoral neck fracture and 7,443 (48.9%) cases of hemiarthroplasty. Thirty-six patients developed acute cholecystitis within 30 days after the index date (30-day cumulative incidence, 0.24%). Four of the 36 acute cholecystitis patients (11.1%) died within 30 days versus 2.92% of patients without acute cholecystitis. In the multivariate-adjusted Poisson regression model, hip fracture patients with incident acute cholecystitis were 4.35 (adjusted risk ratio 4.35; 95% confidence interval, 1.66-11.37; P = 0.003) times more likely to die within 30 days than those without acute cholecystitis. CONCLUSION: Incidence of acute cholecystitis in elderly patients after hip fracture within 30 days after the index date was 0.24%. Acute cholecystitis in elderly hip fracture patients dramatically increases the 30-day mortality rate by 4.35-fold. Therefore, early disease detection and management are crucial for patients.

Early surgical management of acute cholecystitis in ultra-octogenarian patients: our 5-year experience.

BACKGROUND: Acute calculous cholecystitis is a leading cause for hospital admission especially in developed countries. As older age population increases, medical research should consider the efficacy of all therapeutic options, including early surgical procedure in an emergency context, for the treatment of acute cholecystitis in elderly high-risk patients. METHODS: From 01/01/2012 to 31/12/2016, 245 patients were admitted to our Institution with diagnosis of acute cholecystitis and managed with cholecystectomy within the same hospitalization. The study population was divided into 2 subgroups: group A (patients aged more than 80 years) and group B (patients within the limit of 80 years of age); the objective of the study was to evaluate and compare the surgical outcomes of the 2 groups in terms of conversion rate, mortality rate, overall morbidity and procedure-related complication rates. RESULTS: Statistical analysis did not show significant differences between ultra octogenarian and younger patients in terms of conversion to open procedure, iatrogenic bile duct lesions, postoperative peritoneal bleeding, bile leakage and peritoneal collection; no differences in terms of hospital stay have been demonstrated. Mortality and overall morbidity rates, even if similar to what observed in Literature and within acceptable values, were significantly higher in elderly patients, due to the presence of severe comorbidities leading to potentially fatal postoperative events. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive approach in an emergency setting for acute cholecystitis seems to be a feasible and adequate therapeutic approach for extremely aged high-risk patients.

Percutaneous Cholecystostomy Versus Conservative Treatment for Acute Cholecystitis: a Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous cholecystostomy is frequently used as a treatment option for acute calculous cholecystitis in patients unfit for surgery. There is sparse evidence on the long-term impact of cholecystostomy on gallstone-related morbidity and mortality in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis. This study describes the long-term outcome of acute calculous cholecystitis following percutaneous cholecystostomy compared to conservative treatment. METHODS: This was a cohort study of patients admitted at our institution from 2006 to 2015 with acute calculous cholecystitis without early or delayed cholecystectomy. Endpoints were gallstone-related readmissions, recurrent cholecystitis, and overall mortality. RESULTS: The investigation included 201 patients of whom 97 (48.2%) underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy. Patients in the cholecystostomy group had significantly higher age, comorbidity level, and inflammatory response at admission. The median duration of catheter placement in the cholecystostomy group was 6 days. The complication rate of cholecystostomy was 3.1% and the mortality during the index admission was 3.5%. The median follow-up was 1.6 years. The rate of gallstone-related readmissions was 38.6%, and 25.3% had recurrence of cholecystitis. Cox regression analyses revealed no significant differences in gallstone-related readmissions, recurrence of acute calculous cholecystitis, and overall mortality in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous cholecystostomy in the treatment of acute calculous cholecystitis was neither associated with long-term benefits nor complications. Based on the high gallstone-related readmission rates of this study population and todays perioperative improvements, we suggest rethinking the indications for non-operative management including percutaneous cholecystostomy in acute calculous cholecystitis.

Percutaneous Cholecystostomy for Severe Acute Cholecystitis: A Useful Procedure in High-Risk Patients for Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Acute cholecystitis has the potential to cause sepsis and death, particularly in patients with poor physiological reserve. The gold standard treatment of acute cholecystitis (cholecystectomy) is often not safe in high-risk patients and recourse is made to percutaneous cholecystostomy as either definite treatment or temporizing measure. The aim of this study is to evaluate early and late outcomes following percutaneous cholecystostomy in patients with acute cholecystitis treated at our institution. METHODS: All patients who underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy for acute cholecystitis (excluding patients with malignancy) between January 2005 and September 2014 were included in the study. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients (22 female, median age, 74 years; range, 27-95 years) underwent percutaneous cholecystostomy during the study period. In total, 12 patients (22.6%) had acalculous cholecystitis. The main indications for percutaneous cholecystostomy were significant co-morbidities (n = 28, 52.8%) and patients too unstable for surgery (n = 21, 39.6%). The median time to percutaneous cholecystostomy from diagnosis of acute cholecystitis was 3.6 days (range, 0-45 days). The median length of hospital stay was 27 (range, 4-87) days. The overall 90-day mortality was 9.3% with two further deaths at 12-month follow up. The mortality was significantly higher in patients with American Society of Anesthesiology grade 4-5 (18% vs 0% in American Society of Anesthesiology grade 2-3, p = 0.026) and in patients with acalculous cholecystitis (25% vs 4.5%, p = 0.035). The overall readmission rate was 18%. A total of 24 (45.2%) patients had surgery: laparoscopic cholecystectomy, n = 11; laparoscopic converted to open, n = 5; open total cholecystectomy, n = 5; open cholecystectomy, n = 1; laparotomy and washout, n = 1; laparotomy partial cholecystectomy and closure of perforated small intestine and gastrostomy, n = 1. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous cholecystostomy is a useful temporary or permanent procedure in patients with acute cholecystitis of both calculous and acalculous origin, who are unfit for surgery.