Alternative Conduits for Lower Extremity Bypass.

While single-segment great saphenous vein (GSV) remains the gold-standard conduit for infrainguinal bypass, several alternative options are available for use when GSV is absent in patients with chronic limb threatening ischemia requiring infrainguinal revascularization including alternative autologous vein, prosthetic conduits, and cryopreserved vein grafts.

Contemporary outcomes of concomitant suprainguinal bypass with infrainguinal revascularization procedures in patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Combined suprainguinal and infrainguinal revascularization is sometimes necessary in the treatment of patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). However, data on outcomes of concomitant revascularization procedures are lacking. We studied the outcomes of patients with CLTI who underwent suprainguinal bypass (SIB) alone, SIB with concomitant infrainguinal bypass (IIB), and SIB with concomitant infrainguinal peripheral endovascular intervention (IIPVI). METHODS: We reviewed all patients in the Vascular Quality Initiative with CLTI who underwent SIB from January 2010 to June 2020. Logistic regression, Kaplan-Meier survival estimates, log-rank tests, and Cox regression were used to analyze outcomes. Outcomes were 30-day mortality, perioperative myocardial infarction, perioperative major amputation, 1-year amputation-free survival, and 5-year survival. RESULTS: Of 8037 patients included, 81.3% (n = 6537) underwent SIB alone, 9.7% (n = 783) underwent SIB+IIB, and 8.9% (n = 717) underwent SIB+IIPVI. The indication for surgery was rest pain in 5040 (62.5%) and tissue loss in 3031 (37.6%). There were no significant differences in 30-day mortality and perioperative myocardial infarction rates. However, there was 2.8-fold increased odds of perioperative major amputation in both SIB+IIPVI (odds ratio [OR], 2.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.30-5.88; P = .008) and SIB+IIB (OR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.38-5.54; P = .004) among patients with rest pain as compared with SIB alone. Comparing SIB+IIPVI with SIB alone, there were no significant differences in 1-year freedom from amputation and amputation-free survival. SIB+IIPVI was associated with a 27% increased risk of 5-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 1.27; 95% CI, 1.03-1.55; P = .035). Compared with SIB alone, SIB+IIB was associated with 97% increased risk of 1-year major amputation among patients with rest pain (HR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.06-3.69; P = .033), but a 47% decreased risk of 1-year major amputation or death for patients with tissue loss (HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.37-0.78; P = .001). SIB+IIPVI, compared with SIB+IIB, was associated with a two-fold increased risk of 1-year major amputation or death (HR, 2.04; 95% CI, 1.04-2.23), P = .003) and a 52% increased risk of 5-year mortality (HR,1.52; 95% CI, 1.04-2.24; P = .032) among patients with tissue loss. CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that SIB with concomitant infrainguinal revascularization in patients with rest pain is associated with an increased risk of amputation, whereas SIB+IIB in patients with tissue loss is associated with decreased risk of amputation or death. SIB+IIB outperformed SIB+IIPVI in patients with tissue loss. SIB with infrainguinal revascularization should be limited in patients with rest pain in line with current guidelines, but SIB+IIB may be preferred in patients with tissue loss.

Hybrid revascularization of chronic limb-threatening ischemia using popliteal below-knee and tibial trifurcation open endarterectomy distally plus inter-woven nitinol stenting proximally.

OBJECTIVES: Chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI) is frequently due to multilevel, heavily calcified lesions, and it is often associated with desert foot. Effective revascularization currently presents an additional challenge due to the increasing age, comorbidities, and frailty related to these patients. Pure endovascular treatment often fails to achieve effective and durable revascularization and it is associated with still high amputation rates. We present a novel hybrid approach and discuss its usefulness for limb salvage in complex infrainguinal lesions. METHODS: Two no-option patients for both anatomical and medical-comorbidity reasons, were treated consecutively for CLTI. Both of them had prior failed percutaneous endovascular treatment, and bypass revascularization had been ruled out. We describe the technical details of an aggressive, but still less invasive hybrid approach, consisting of open distal popliteal artery (PA) and tibial trifurcation endarterectomy plus patch angioplasty, associated with proximal endovascular treatment with inter-woven nitinol stent from the superficial femoral artery (SFA) to the endarterectomized area. RESULTS: Technical success and salvage of the affected limb were achieved in both cases, presenting significant postoperative clinical and hemodynamic improvement and allowing early discharge hospital at home. There was no surgical wound infection or other complications. CONCLUSION: This hybrid approach through a single incision is safe and effective in the short term and can be used with excellent results for CLTI in high-risk and /or no-option patients.