Phase IV Studies: What Clinicians Need to Know!

Phase IV trials, also known as postmarketing safety and efficacy studies and postmarketing surveillance (PMS) studies, occur after a drug or medical device has received regulatory approval and is available in the market. These trials are designed to collect additional information regarding the product's safety, efficacy, and prolonged effects in a larger and more diverse patient population. The foremost goal of phase IV trials is to detect any rare or long-term adverse effects that may not have been identified during the prior phases of clinical development. During phase IV trials, pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, or other research organizations conduct studies to evaluate various aspects of the product, including its real-world effectiveness, optimal use, and any potential safety concerns. The regulatory agencies play a role in overseeing these trials to ensure that they are conducted ethically and in compliance with good clinical practice (GCP) guidelines.

A pragmatic randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of an oral short-course regimen including bedaquiline for the treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in China: study protocol for PROSPECT.

INTRODUCTION: The lack of safe, effective, and simple short-course regimens (SCRs) for multidrug-resistant/rifampicin-resistant tuberculosis (MDR/RR-TB) treatment has significantly impeded TB control efforts in China. METHODS: This phase 4, randomized, open-label, controlled, non-inferiority trial aims to assess the efficacy and safety of a 9-month all-oral SCR containing bedaquiline (BDQ) versus an all-oral SCR without BDQ for adult MDR-TB patients (18-65 years) in China. The trial design mainly mirrors that of the "Evaluation of a Standardized Treatment Regimen of Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs for Patients with MDR-TB" (STREAM) stage 2 study, while also incorporating programmatic data from South Africa and the 2019 consensus recommendations of Chinese MDR/RR-TB treatment experts. Experimental arm participants will receive a modified STREAM regimen C that replaces three group C drugs, ethambutol (EMB), pyrazinamide (PZA), and prothionamide (PTO), with two group B drugs, linezolid (LZD) and cycloserine (CS), while omitting high-dose isoniazid (INH) for confirmed INH-resistant cases. BDQ duration will be extended from 6 to 9 months for participants with Mycobacterium tuberculosis-positive sputum cultures at week 16. The control arm will receive a modified STREAM regimen B without high-dose INH and injectable kanamycin (KM) that incorporates experimental arm LZD and CS dosages, treatment durations, and administration methods. LZD (600 mg) will be given daily for ≥ 24 weeks as guided by observed benefits and harm. The primary outcome measures the proportion of participants with favorable treatment outcomes at treatment completion (week 40), while the same measurement taken at 48 weeks post-treatment completion is the secondary outcome. Assuming an α = 0.025 significance level (one-sided test), 80% power, 15% non-inferiority margin, and 10% lost to follow-up rate, each arm requires 106 participants (212 total) to demonstrate non-inferiority. DISCUSSION: PROSPECT aims to assess the safety and efficacy of a BDQ-containing SCR MDR-TB treatment at seventeen sites across China, while also providing high-quality data to guide SCRs administration under the direction of the China National Tuberculosis Program for MDR-TB. Additionally, PROSPECT will explore the potential benefits of extending the administration of the 9-month BDQ-containing SCR for participants without sputum conversion by week 16. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05306223. Prospectively registered on 16 March 2022 at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05306223?term=NCT05306223&draw=1&rank=1 {2}.

Discontinuation and nonpublication of clinical trials in orthopaedic oncology.

BACKGROUND: Despite the pivotal role of clinical trials in advancing orthopaedic oncology knowledge and treatment strategies, the persistent issues of trial discontinuation and nonpublication are significant problems. This study conducted an analysis examining clinical trial discontinuation rates, associations between intervention types and discontinuation/nonpublication, and the role of funding, enrollment size, and their implications for trial success and completion. METHODS: This study, conducted on May 1, 2023, utilized a cross-sectional design to comprehensively analyze phase 3 and 4 randomized controlled trials within the realm of orthopaedic oncology. We specifically incorporated Phase 3 and 4 trials as they are designed to evaluate prolonged outcomes in human subjects and are more likely to reach publication. Study characteristics of interest included the intervention utilized in the clinical trial, presence of funding, whether the trial was published, completed, and trial enrollment size. The investigation involved an examination of ClinicalTrials.gov, a prominent online repository of clinical trial data managed by the National Library of Medicine of the USA. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regressions were used to determine statistical significance. RESULTS: Among the cohort of 130 trials, 19.2% were prematurely discontinued. Completion rates varied based on intervention type; 111 pharmaceutical trials demonstrated a completion rate of 83.8%, whereas 19 non-pharmaceutical trials exhibited a completion rate of 8.0% (P < .001). Surgical trials, totaling 10, showed a completion rate of 90%. The overall trial publication rate was 86.15%, with pharmaceutical interventions achieving a publication rate of 91.96%. Larger-scale trials (≥ 261 participants) emerged as a protective factor against both discontinuation (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR]: 0.85, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 0.42-0.95) and nonpublication (AOR: 0.19, 95% CI 0.13-.47), compared to smaller-scale trials. CONCLUSION: This study accentuates the heightened vulnerability of non-pharmaceutical interventions and trials exhibiting lower rates of enrollment to the issues of discontinuation and nonpublication. Moving forward, the advancement of clinical trials necessitates a concerted effort to enhance trial methodologies, especially concerning nonpharmaceutical interventions, along with a meticulous refinement of participant enrollment criteria.

Effects of ferric derisomaltose on postoperative anaemia in adult spinal deformity surgery: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative anaemia is prevalent in adult spinal deformity (ASD) surgery in association with unfavourable outcomes. Ferric derisomaltose, a novel iron supplement, offers a promising solution in rapidly treating postoperative anaemia. However, the clinical evidence of its effect on patients receiving spinal surgery remains inadequate. This randomised controlled trial aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ferric derisomaltose on postoperative anaemia in ASD patients. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-centre, phase 4, randomised controlled trial will be conducted at Department of Orthopaedics at Peking Union Medical College Hospital and aims to recruit adult patients who received ASD surgery with postoperative anaemia. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned to receive ferric derisomaltose infusion or oral ferrous succinate. The primary outcome is the change in haemoglobin concentrations from postoperative days 1-14. Secondary outcomes include changes in iron parameters, reticulocyte parameters, postoperative complications, allogeneic red blood cell infusion rates, length of hospital stay, functional assessment and quality-of-life evaluation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee of Peking Union Medical College Hospital and registered at ClinicalTrials.gov. Informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to enrolment and the study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. The results of this study are expected to be disseminated through peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05714007.

CaboCombo: a prospective, phase IV study of first-line cabozantinib + nivolumab for advanced renal cell carcinoma.

Cabozantinib plus nivolumab was approved as a first-line (1L) treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) following the CheckMate 9ER trial. CaboCombo (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05361434) is a non-interventional study designed to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of cabozantinib plus nivolumab in a real-world setting. Overall, 311 patients with clear-cell aRCC receiving 1L cabozantinib plus nivolumab will be recruited from at least 70 centers in seven countries worldwide. The primary end point is overall survival at 18 months. Secondary end points include progression-free survival, objective response rate, safety, patterns of treatment, subsequent anticancer therapies and quality of life. CaboCombo will provide real-world evidence on the characteristics, treatment sequences, and outcomes of patients with aRCC receiving 1L cabozantinib plus nivolumab.

Renal cell carcinomas (RCC) are cancers that grow in the kidneys. Clear-cell RCC is the most common type reported in almost three quarters of patients. RCC tumors become advanced if they grow and spread to other parts of the body. In a clinical trial called CheckMate 9ER, a combination of two drugs called cabozantinib and nivolumab improved survival compared with a drug called sunitinib in patients with advanced clear-cell RCC who had not received any previous treatments. In CheckMate 9ER, cabozantinib plus nivolumab also reduced the size and slowed the spread of tumors compared with sunitinib. However, clinical trials only allow certain patients to participate under strict treatment conditions and so do not provide information on how a treatment will work in all patients. Researchers therefore carry out additional studies to gather extra information from real-world clinical practice. CaboCombo is a study that will look at how well cabozantinib plus nivolumab stops tumors from growing and spreading, the side effects of the drugs, and also how the drugs are used by doctors. It is an observational study, which means that researchers will observe all patients and doctors using the treatment but they will not intervene. The aim of the study is to gather information that will help doctors make treatment decisions for their patients. This article describes how the CaboCombo study will be carried out and the information it will give the researchers. The results will help physicians make decisions on the best treatment option for patients. Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05361434 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Pharmacokinetics and safety of first-line tuberculosis drugs rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide during pregnancy and postpartum: results from IMPAACT P1026s.

Physiological changes during pregnancy may alter the pharmacokinetics (PK) of antituberculosis drugs. The International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network P1026s was a multicenter, phase IV, observational, prospective PK and safety study of antiretroviral and antituberculosis drugs administered as part of clinical care in pregnant persons living with and without HIV. We assessed the effects of pregnancy on rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide PK in pregnant and postpartum (PP) persons without HIV treated for drug-susceptible tuberculosis disease. Daily antituberculosis treatment was prescribed following World Health Organization-recommended weight-band dosing guidelines. Steady-state 12-hour PK profiles of rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide were performed during second trimester (2T), third trimester (3T), and 2-8 of weeks PP. PK parameters were characterized using noncompartmental analysis, and comparisons were made using geometric mean ratios (GMRs) with 90% confidence intervals (CI). Twenty-seven participants were included: 11 African, 9 Asian, 3 Hispanic, and 4 mixed descent. PK data were available for 17, 21, and 14 participants in 2T, 3T, and PP, respectively. Rifampin and pyrazinamide AUC0-24 and C max in pregnancy were comparable to PP with the GMR between 0.80 and 1.25. Compared to PP, isoniazid AUC0-24 was 25% lower and C max was 23% lower in 3T. Ethambutol AUC0-24 was 39% lower in 3T but limited by a low PP sample size. In summary, isoniazid and ethambutol concentrations were lower during pregnancy compared to PP concentrations, while rifampin and pyrazinamide concentrations were similar. However, the median AUC0-24 for rifampin, isoniazid, and pyrazinamide met the therapeutic targets. The clinical impact of lower isoniazid and ethambutol exposure during pregnancy needs to be determined.

Favorable impact of therapy management by an interactive eHealth system on severe adverse events in patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer treated by palbociclib and endocrine therapy.

BACKGROUND: Oral cancer medications offer advantages but also pose challenges for therapy management and adherence. An eHealth-based platform such as CANKADO can help to support therapy management by probing the patient's quality of life (QoL) continuously throughout the course of treatment. MATERIAL AND METHODS: AGO-B WSG PreCycle (NCT03220178) is a multicenter, randomized phase IV intergroup trial evaluating the impact of eHealth-based Patient-Reported Outcome (ePRO) assessment on QoL in patients with hormone receptor-positive (HR + )/HER2-negative (HER2-) advanced breast cancer treated with palbociclib and endocrine therapy. Patients were randomized (2:1) to CANKADO-active arm (supported by CANKADO PRO-React) or CANKADO-inform arm (drug intake documentation only) This exploratory analysis reports the impact of CANKADO PRO-React on safety. Time to first serious adverse event (SAE) was estimated taking competing risks into account. RESULTS: While distributions of adverse events (AEs) were similar by arm overall, patients in the CANKADO-active arm had a favorable hazard ratio of 0.67 (95%CI 0.46-0.97; p = 0.04) for time to first SAE and were significantly less likely overall to suffer an SAE than patients in the inform arm. At 24 months, 22.9% [17.9%-27.8%] of patients in CANKADO-active had suffered an SAE vs. 30.3% [22.6%-38.0%] in CANKADO-inform. AE-related dose reductions affected approximately 20% of patients (CANKADO-active: 18.2%, CANKADO-inform: 21.1%). CONCLUSION: Exploratory safety analysis of PreCycle demonstrates for the first time in a randomized prospective trial that interactive autonomous eHealth-based support has a substantial favorable impact on the risk of SAEs and mitigates their severity for patients with advanced HR+/HER2- breast cancer on oral tumor therapy.

Randomised, open-label, non-inferiority clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of a 7-day vs 14-day course of antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated enterococcal bacteraemia: the INTENSE trial protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Enterococcus spp is responsible for 8%-15% of total bacteraemias with an associated global mortality around 23%-30%. Regarding the clinical management of enterococcal bacteraemia, the evidence on the duration of antibiotic treatment is scarce and the studies do not discriminate between complicated and uncomplicated bacteraemia. METHODS: The INTENSE study is a multicentre, open-label, randomised, pragmatic, phase-IV clinical trial to demonstrate the non-inferiority of a 7-day vs 14-day course for the treatment of uncomplicated enterococcal bacteraemia and incorporating the early switching to oral antibiotics when feasible. The primary efficacy endpoint is the clinical cure at day 30±2 after the end of the treatment. Secondary endpoints will include the rate of relapse or infective endocarditis, length of stay, duration of intravenous therapy, Clostridioides difficile infection and the evaluation of the safety of both treatment arms through the recording and analysis of adverse events. For a 6% non-inferiority margin and considering a 5% withdrawal rate, 284 patients will be included. ANALYSIS: The difference in proportions with one-sided 95% CIs will be calculated for the clinical cure rate using the control group as reference. For secondary categorical endpoints, a similar analysis will be performed and Mann-Whitney U-test will be used to compare median values of quantitative variables. A superiority analysis applying the response adjusted for days of antibiotic risk will be performed if there were incidents in recruitment; will allow obtaining results with 194 patients recruited. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has obtained the authorisation from the Spanish Regulatory Authority, the approval of the ethics committee and the agreement of the directors of each centre. Data will be published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05394298.

Identifying biomarkers of treatment response to ciclosporin in atopic dermatitis through multiomic predictive modelling: DERMATOMICS study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: There is a need to optimise the management of atopic dermatitis (AD), improving the efficacy of treatments and reducing the toxicity associated with them. Although the efficacy of ciclosporine (CsA) in the treatment of AD has been thoroughly documented in the literature, the optimal dose has not been yet established. The use of multiomic predictive models of treatment response could optimise CsA therapy in AD. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The study is a low-intervention phase 4 trial to optimise the treatment of patients with moderate-severe AD requiring systemic treatment. The primary objectives are to identify biomarkers that could allow for the selection of responders and non-responders to first-line treatment with CsA and to develop a response prediction model to optimise the CsA dose and treatment regimen in responding patients based on these biomarkers. The study is divided into two cohorts: the first comprised of patients starting treatment with CsA (cohort 1), and the second, of patients already receiving or who have received CsA therapy (cohort 2). ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study activities began following authorisation by the Spanish Regulatory Agency (AEMPS) and the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of La Paz University Hospital approval. Trial results will be submitted for publication in an open access peer-reviewed medical speciality-specific publication.Trial registration of this study can be located at the EU Clinical Trials Register, available from https://euclinicaltrials.eu/search-for-clinical-trials/?lang=en. Our clinical trial was registered in the website before the enrolment of the first patient complying with European regulations. EU Clinical Trials Register is a primary registry according the WHO. Once our trial was included in a primary and official registry, in order to extend the accessibility to our research, we also registered it retrospectively in clinicaltrials.gov; however, this is not mandatory as per our regulation. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05692843.

Patiromer utility as an adjunct treatment in patients needing urgent hyperkalaemia management (PLATINUM): design of a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study.

INTRODUCTION: Hyperkalaemia is common, life-threatening and often requires emergency department (ED) management; however, no standardised ED treatment protocol exists. Common treatments transiently reducing serum potassium (K+) (including albuterol, glucose and insulin) may cause hypoglycaemia. We outline the design and rationale of the Patiromer Utility as an Adjunct Treatment in Patients Needing Urgent Hyperkalaemia Management (PLATINUM) study, which will be the largest ED randomised controlled hyperkalaemia trial ever performed, enabling assessment of a standardised approach to hyperkalaemia management, as well as establishing a new evaluation parameter (net clinical benefit) for acute hyperkalaemia treatment investigations. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: PLATINUM is a Phase 4, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in participants who present to the ED at approximately 30 US sites. Approximately 300 adult participants with hyperkalaemia (K+ ≥5.8 mEq/L) will be enrolled. Participants will be randomised 1:1 to receive glucose (25 g intravenously <15 min before insulin), insulin (5 units intravenous bolus) and aerosolised albuterol (10 mg over 30 min), followed by a single oral dose of either 25.2 g patiromer or placebo, with a second dose of patiromer (8.4 g) or placebo after 24 hours. The primary endpoint is net clinical benefit, defined as the mean change in the number of additional interventions less the mean change in serum K+, at hour 6. Secondary endpoints are net clinical benefit at hour 4, proportion of participants without additional K+-related medical interventions, number of additional K+-related interventions and proportion of participants with sustained K+ reduction (K+ ≤5.5 mEq/L). Safety endpoints are the incidence of adverse events, and severity of changes in serum K+ and magnesium. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A central Institutional Review Board (IRB) and Ethics Committee provided protocol approval (#20201569), with subsequent approval by local IRBs at each site, and participants will provide written consent. Primary results will be published in peer-reviewed manuscripts promptly following study completion. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04443608.

Characteristics of Phase IV Clinical Trials in Oncology: An Analysis Using the ClinicalTrials.gov Registry Data.

The present study analyzed the characteristics of phase IV clinical trials in oncology using data from the ClinicalTrials.gov registry. The included trials were conducted between January 2013 and December 2022 and were examined for key characteristics, including outcome measures, interventions, sample sizes, and study design, different cancer types, and geographic regions. The analysis included 368 phase IV oncology studies. An amount of 50% of these studies examined both safety and efficacy, while 43.5% only reported efficacy outcome measures, and 6.5% only described safety outcome measures. Only 16.9% of studies were powered to detect adverse events with a frequency of 1 in 100. Targeted therapies accounted for the majority of included studies (53.5%), with breast (32.91%) and hematological cancers (25.82%) being the most frequently investigated malignancies. Most phase IV oncology studies lacked sufficient power to detect rare adverse events due to their small sample sizes and instead focused on effectiveness. To ensure that there is no gap in drug safety data collection and detection of rare adverse events due to limited phase IV clinical trials, there is a significant need for additional education and participation by both health care providers and patients in spontaneous reporting processes.

DosEmi study protocol: a phase IV, multicentre, open-label, crossover study to evaluate non-inferiority of pharmacokinetic-guided reduced dosing compared with conventional dosing of emicizumab in people with haemophilia A.

INTRODUCTION: Emicizumab effectively prevents bleeding in people with haemophilia A (PwHA), but is a burden for national healthcare budgets and consequently may limit access. According to the drug label, dosing of emicizumab is based on body weight with fixed intervals of 7, 14 or 28 days, which leads to mean plasma concentrations of 55 µg/mL (SD 15 µg/mL). However, a moderate variability of concentrations and a minimal effective concentration of 30 µg/mL have been suggested in studies. Therefore, a dose of emicizumab that targets a trough concentration of 30 µg/mL is hypothesised to be equally effective as conventional dosing in the prevention of bleeding. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We designed a phase IV, multicentre, open-label, crossover study to evaluate non-inferiority of bleed control of ≥6 months on conventional dosing in comparison to ≥6 months on dose intervention. This dose intervention consists of reducing the dose of emicizumab to target a trough concentrations of 30 µg/mL using individual pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters. Ninety-five PwHA aged >1 years who received conventional dosing of emicizumab for ≥12 months with good bleeding control during the last 6 months will be recruited from all Dutch haemophilia treatment centres. The study is powered to detect a clinically relevant decrease (risk difference) of 15% in the proportion of patients without treated bleeds during follow-up. Secondary endpoints are spontaneous joint or muscle bleeds, and annualised treated bleeding rates (using negative binomial regression). Cost-effectivity between conventional dosing and individualised PK-guided dosing of emicizumab will be compared. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The DosEmi study was approved by the Medical Ethics Review Committee NedMec of the University Medical Center of Utrecht, The Netherlands. Study results will be communicated through publications in international scientific journals and presentations at (inter)national conferences. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EUCTR2021-004039-10-NL at https://trialsearch.who.int. PROTOCOL VERSION: V.4.1 on 28 October 2022 (DosEmi protocol_V4.1; NL81112.041.22).

Randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of glycopyrronium in children and adolescents with severe sialorrhoea and neurodisabilities: protocol of the SALIVA trial.

INTRODUCTION: Severe sialorrhoea is a common, distressing problem in children/adolescents with neurodisabilities, which has adverse health and social consequences. The SALIVA trial is designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a paediatric-specific oral solution of glycopyrronium along with its impact on quality-of-life (QoL), which has been lacking from previous trials of sialorrhoea treatments. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase IV trial is ongoing in several centres across France. Eighty children aged 3-17 years with severe sialorrhoea (≥6 on the modified Teachers Drooling Scale) related to chronic neurological disorders in whom non-pharmacological standard of care has already been implemented or has failed, will be recruited. Patients will be randomised 1:1 to receive a 2 mg/5 mL solution of glycopyrronium bromide (Sialanar 320 µg/mL glycopyrronium) or placebo three times daily during a 3-month blinded period. After Day 84, participants will be invited into a 6-month, open-label study extension period, where they will all receive glycopyrronium. The primary endpoint of the double-blind period will be the change from baseline to Day 84 in the Drooling Impact Scale (DIS), a validated measure to assess sialorrhoea. A series of secondary efficacy endpoints involving change in total DIS, specific DIS items and response (DIS improvement ≥13.6 points) will be analysed in a prespecified hierarchy. QoL data will be collected from parents, caregivers and patients where possible using specific DIS questions and DISABKIDS questionnaires. Safety endpoints, including adverse events, will be assessed throughout the trial periods. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: In total, 87 children have been recruited and recruitment is now complete. Final results are expected by the end of 2023. Findings will be presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: EudraCT 2020-005534-15.

Safety and efficacy of tirofiban in acute ischemic stroke due to tandem lesions undergoing mechanical thrombectomy: A multicenter randomized clinical trial (ATILA) protocol.

Background: In-stent thrombosis after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) worsen outcomes in acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to tandem lesions (TL). Although an optimal antiplatelet therapy is needed, the best approach to avoid in-stent thrombosis is yet to be elucidated. Hypothesis: Low-dose intravenous tirofiban is superior to intravenous aspirin in avoiding in-stent thrombosis in patients undergoing MT plus carotid stenting in the setting of AIS due to TL. Methods: The ATILA-trial is a multicenter, prospective, phase IV, randomized, controlled (aspirin group as control), assessor-blinded clinical trial. Patients fulfilling inclusion criteria (AIS due to TL, ASPECTS ⩾ 6, pre-stroke modified Rankin Scale ⩽2 and onset <24 h) will be randomized (1:1) at MT onset to experimental (intravenous tirofiban) or control group (intravenous aspirin). Intravenous aspirin will be administered at a 500 mg single dose and tirofiban at a 500 µg bolus followed by a 200 µg/h infusion during first 22 h. All patients will be followed up to 3 months. Sample size estimated is 240 patients. Outcomes: The primary efficacy outcome is the proportion of patients with carotid in-stent thrombosis within the first 24 h after MT. The primary safety outcome is the rate of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage. Secondary outcomes include functional independence defined as modified Rankin Scale 0-2, proportion of patients undergoing rescue therapy due to in-stent aggregation during MT and carotid reocclusion at 30 days. Discussion: ATILA-trial will be the first clinical trial regarding the best antiplatelet therapy to avoid in-stent thrombosis after MT in patients with TL. Trial registration: NCT0522596.

Patient-reported well-being in value-based care using tildrakizumab in a real-world setting: protocol of a multinational, phase IV, 1-cohort prospective observational study (the POSITIVE study).

INTRODUCTION: Psoriasis is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that negatively impacts the quality of life of patients and their families. However, the most commonly used decision-making tools in psoriasis, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), do not fully capture the impact of psoriasis on patients' lives. In contrast, the well-established 5-item WHO Well-being Index (WHO-5) assesses the subjective psychological well-being of patients. Moreover, while drug innovations became available for psoriasis, data on the impact of these therapies on patients' lives and their closest environment (family, physicians) are limited. This study will assess the effect of tildrakizumab, an interleukin-23p19 inhibitor, on the overall well-being of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Moreover, the long-term benefit of tildrakizumab on physicians' satisfaction and partners' lives of patients with psoriasis will be evaluated. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This non-interventional, prospective, observational, real-world evidence study will involve multiple sites in Europe and approximately 500 adults with moderate-to-severe psoriasis treated with tildrakizumab. Each patient will be followed for 24 months. The primary endpoint is well-being measured by the WHO-5 questionnaire. Key secondary endpoints include Physician's Satisfaction and partner's quality of life (FamilyPso). Other endpoints will evaluate skin-generic quality of life (DLQI-R), Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM-9), Treatment-related Patient Benefit Index 'Standard', 10 items (PBI-S-10) and work productivity and activity impairment due to psoriasis (WPAI:PSO). Statistical analyses will be based on observed cases. Multiple imputations will be performed as a sensitivity analysis, and adverse events will be reported. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will be conducted according to the protocol, which received ethics committee approval and applicable regulatory requirements of each participating country. The results will be disseminated through scientific publications and congress presentations. TRAIL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04823247 (Pre-results).

[Andexanet alfa (ONDEXXYA® for Intravenous Injection 200†mg), a reversal agent for direct factor Xa inhibitors: pharmacological characteristics and clinical evidence].

Andexanet alfa is a modified recombinant human factor Xa (FXa) that was designed to serve as a binding target for FXa inhibitors as decoy protein. It sequesters FXa inhibitors from binding to endogenous FXa, thereby reversing anticoagulant effect of FXa inhibitors. Andexanet alfa has been approved in March 2022 in Japan for patients with life-threatening or uncontrolled bleeding while on treatment with a FXa inhibitor, apixaban, rivaroxaban, or edoxaban tosilate hydrate. It is administered via two dosing regimens, based on the type of FXa inhibitor, dose, and time since the last dose. In nonclinical studies, andexanet alfa significantly inhibited bleeding induced by FXa inhibitors in animal bleeding models. In the development for Japanese patients, the following two clinical studies have been conducted to confirm the efficacy and safety. First, safety and the reversal effect of andexanet alfa on the FXa inhibitor-mediated anticoagulant activity in healthy adults were confirmed in the overseas phase 2 study including Japanese subjects. Next, the reversal effect of andexanet alfa on the anticoagulation activity and the hemostasis were demonstrated in patients with acute major bleeding while on FXa inhibitor treatment in the global phase 3b/4 study (ANNEXA-4 study). The subgroup analysis of Japanese population showed that the efficacy and safety results were consistent with those of overall population. Andexanet alfa is the first approved reversal agent for FXa inhibitors in Japan and is expected to contribute to the improvement of prognosis in patients with fatal and/or uncontrolled bleeding by timely reversing anticoagulant effect of FXa inhibitors.

Opicapone for the treatment of Parkinson's disease: a review.

Purpose: Levodopa formulations are the workhorses of the labor against motor symptoms management in Parkinson's disease (PD). Progression of PD on levodopa inevitably leads to motor fluctuations. It is important to understand the safety and efficacy of opicapone, the most recent addition to the clinician's armamentarium against these fluctuations.Materials and methods: We review the development of COMT inhibitors in the treatment of PD as well as the efficacy and safety data reported in the currently published literature of opicapone in PD. The "currently published literature" is defined as all published, PubMed indexed trials including the word "opicapone." Finally, we compare opicapone to the competitor pharmaceuticals on the market to treat symptom fluctuations in PD and share our opinion of opicapone's place in clinical practice.Results: From the reported results of phase 3 and 4 trials of opicapone in PD, it is a safe and efficacious option to combat motor fluctuations for our PD patients taking levodopa. A reduction of "off" time by up to 1 h per day can be expected, increasing "on" time with fewer dyskinesias. Opicapone is not generally hepatotoxic, and the most reported side-effects-dyskinesia, dry mouth, dizziness, diarrhea, and constipation-were seen in only 1.4% of the OPTIPARK (a large phase 4 clinical trial) study population.Conclusions: One should consider utilizing opicapone, perhaps in combination with other augmenting medications with different mechanisms of action, to help treat motor and non-motor fluctuations in PD.

Cost-Effectiveness of Acthar Gel Versus Standard of Care for the Treatment of Exacerbations in Moderate-to-Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

INTRODUCTION: Despite current standard of care (SoC), there is an unmet need for the treatment of active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). The study assessed the cost-effectiveness of Acthar® Gel (repository corticotropin injection) versus SoC treatment in patients with active, moderate-to-severe SLE from the US payer and societal perspectives over 2 and 3 years. METHODS: Cost-effectiveness model was developed using a probabilistic cohort-level state-transition approach. Patients received Acthar Gel in an exacerbation state, and the outcomes were assessed at the end of a 3-month cycle for response achievement based on the probability of treatment success with Acthar Gel. Patients may sustain the response or experience an exacerbation. For the base case scenario, moderate-to-severe SLE was defined as British Isles Lupus Assessment Group (BILAG)-2004 ≥ 20 or SLE Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) ≥ 10 and clinical response was based on SLE responder index (SRI)-4. Clinical response, productivity loss, and utility were derived from a phase 4 SLE trial; cost and disutility estimates were sourced from the literature. RESULTS: From a payer perspective, Acthar Gel versus SoC resulted in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of $133,110 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) and $94,818 per QALY over 2 and 3 years, respectively. From a societal perspective, Acthar Gel versus SoC results in an ICER of $70,827 per QALY and $32,525 per QALY over 2 and 3 years, respectively. Results from the sensitivity and scenario analyses are consistent with those of the base case model. CONCLUSIONS: Acthar Gel is a cost-effective, value-based treatment option for appropriate patients with moderate-to-severe SLE at a willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000 over 2-3 years from the US payer and societal perspectives. Acthar Gel results in the reduction of direct medical and indirect costs.

Treatment of early borderline lesions in low immunological risk kidney transplant patients: a Spanish multicenter, randomized, controlled parallel-group study protocol: the TRAINING study.

BACKGROUND: Subclinical inflammation, including borderline lesions (BL), is very common (30-40%) after kidney transplantation (KT), even in low immunological risk patients, and can lead to interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (IFTA) and worsening of renal function with graft loss. Few controlled studies have analyzed the therapeutic benefit of treating these BL on renal function and graft histology. Furthermore, these studies have only used bolus steroids, which may be insufficient to slow the progression of these lesions. Klotho, a transmembrane protein produced mainly in the kidney with antifibrotic properties, plays a crucial role in the senescence-inflammation binomial of kidney tissue. Systemic and local inflammation decrease renal tissue expression and soluble levels of α-klotho. It is therefore important to determine whether treatment of BL prevents a decrease in α-klotho levels, progression of IFTA, and loss of kidney function. METHODS: The TRAINING study will randomize 80 patients with low immunological risk who will receive their first KT. The aim of the study is to determine whether the treatment of early BL (3rd month post-KT) with polyclonal rabbit antithymocyte globulin (Grafalon®) (6 mg/kg/day) prevents or decreases the progression of IFTA and the worsening of graft function compared to conventional therapy after two years post-KT, as well as to analyze whether treatment of BL with Grafalon® can modify the expression and levels of klotho, as well as the pro-inflammatory cytokines that regulate its expression. DISCUSSION: This phase IV investigator-driven, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial will examine the efficacy and safety of Grafalon® treatment in low-immunological-risk KT patients with early BL. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov : NCT04936282. Registered June 23, 2021, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04936282?term=NCT04936282&draw=2&rank=1 . Protocol Version 2 of 21 January 2022. SPONSOR: Canary Isles Institute for Health Research Foundation, Canary Isles (FIISC). mgomez@fciisc.org .