Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction post-cesarean section is not a benign entity: A case series and review of the literature.

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) is an infrequent occurrence after cesarean section. Anecdotal evidence suggests that the clinical course of ACPO in the obstetric setting is different to that seen in non-pregnant adult patients with ACPO secondary to alternative causes, such as systemic illnesses, the use of certain medications, and after non-abdominal surgery. The risk of progression to ischemia and perforation, as well as the need for emergency surgery, appears to be higher after cesarean section. Here we describe the clinical course of ACPO in four patients after cesarean section from our institution, followed by a review of the literature and a discussion of the important issues surrounding this condition in the postpartum time period. The findings from our cohort of patients and the reports from the medical literature support a hands-on combined approach from a group of specialists including obstetricians, surgeons, radiologists, and enterostomal therapists. Immediate imaging followed by regular observation is mandatory for any patient being managed conservatively. Early use of endoscopic decompression should be considered for patients who are not resolving with a conservative approach. Clinical signs of peritonism or radiological signs of ischemia or perforation in patients with ACPO mandate immediate surgical intervention. Appropriate postoperative care is necessary to deal with the complex physiological and psychological consequences of emergency surgery and potential stoma formation so soon after cesarean section.

Ogilvie's Syndrome in a Patient at 23 Weeks of Pregnancy: Report of a Rare Case with Successful Surgical Intervention.

BACKGROUND Ogilvie's syndrome (acute colonic pseudo-obstruction) is a syndrome characterized by symptoms suggestive of intestinal obstruction without an identifiable mechanical cause. It presents with excessive dilation of the loops of the large intestine. The treatment options include conservative management, endoscopic methods, and surgical intervention. If appropriate treatment is not implemented promptly, this syndrome can lead to life-threatening complications for the patient. Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction typically occurs in elderly individuals with numerous chronic diseases, extensive surgeries, or trauma. In younger individuals, risk factors include gynecological procedures, pregnancy, and childbirth. CASE REPORT This work presents a case of a 30-year-old woman at 23 weeks of pregnancy. She presented with persistent abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting for several days. The patient was initially treated at the Obstetrics Clinic, where conservative management was implemented. Due to worsening symptoms after confirming pathological distension of the colon in the magnetic resonance imaging examination, she was transferred to the surgery clinic. Due to her unstable general condition and lack of improvement with conservative treatment, she was qualified for an appendectomy with the formation of a cecostomy. The performed surgical treatment led to an improvement in the patient's condition and did not have a negative impact on the further development of the child. CONCLUSIONS Ogilvie's syndrome in pregnancy is an extremely rare condition that can lead to significant complications. Its treatment requires the coordinated efforts of a multidisciplinary team of specialists. During the course of therapy, it is important to consider the limitations imposed by pregnancy on diagnostic and therapeutic methods.

Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Colonic Pseudo-obstruction (ACPO).

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Acute Colonic Pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) is a cause of large intestinal dilation and obstruction without any physical transition point. It remains difficult to diagnose and treat. We review the recent updates on diagnosis and management of ACPO. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent guidelines have posited that conservative management can be tried in most cases of ACPO, but that early decompression and surgery should be considered. Use of neostigmine is still a viable option but there is also promising data on pyridostigmine as well as prucalopride. Resolution of ACPO should be followed by daily use of polyethylene glycol (PEG) to help prevent recurrence. ACPO warrants early and accurate diagnosis with exclusion of alternate causes of large bowel dilation. Conservative management can be attempted for 48-72 h in those with cecal diameters < 12 cm and without signs of peritonitis and perforation. Early escalation of management should be attempted with neostigmine followed by endoscopy and/or surgery as needed, given that longer periods of dilation are associated with worse outcomes. There is promising new evidence for use of pyridostigmine and prucalopride, but further trials are needed prior to incorporating them into regular use. Finally, studies are lacking regarding prevention of ACPO after initial resolution.

Acute Colonic Pseudo-obstruction: Colonoscopy Versus Neostigmine First?

INTRODUCTION: Neostigmine (NEO) and decompressive colonoscopy (COL) are two efficacious treatment modalities for acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO). We hypothesize that a COL first strategy is associated with better outcomes compared to a NEO first strategy. METHODS: A single-center retrospective analysis was performed from 2013 to 2020. Patients ≥18 y with a diagnosis of ACPO were included. The outcome was a composite measure of acute operative intervention, 30-day readmission with ACPO, and 30-day ACPO-related mortality. A P-value of ≤ 0.05 indicated statistical significance. RESULTS: Of 910 encounters in 849 patients, 50 (5.5%) episodes of ACPO in 39 patients were identified after exclusion of one patient with colon perforation on presentation. The median (interquartile range) age was 68 (62-84) y. NEO and COL were administered in 21 and 25 episodes, respectively. In 16 (32%) episodes, no NEO or COL was administered. When patients were given NEO first, COL or additional NEO was required in 12/18 (67%) compared with a COL first strategy where a second COL and/or NEO was given in 5/16 (32%) (P = 0.05). Both strategies had similar outcomes (NEO, 4/18 versus COL, 4/16, P = 0.85). Twenty-two (44%) episodes had an early intervention (≤48 h) with NEO and/or COL. There was no difference in outcome between those that received an early intervention and those who did not (5/22 versus 5/28, P = 0.71). CONCLUSIONS: For patients failing conservative measures, a COL first approach was associated with fewer subsequent interventions, but with similar composite outcomes compared to a NEO first approach. Early (≤48 h) intervention with NEO and/or COL was not associated with improved outcomes.

Ogilvie's syndrome after paddle spinal cord stimulator implantation: An experience report.

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is an emerging technology to treat chronic pain from complex regional pain syndrome (CPRS) neuropathy and post-laminectomy syndrome. A rarely reported postoperative complication of SCS paddle implantation is abdominal pain that can result from thoracic radiculopathy. Ogilvie's syndrome (OS) is a disorder characterized by acute dilatation of the colon in the absence of an anatomic lesion that obstructs the flow of intestinal contents, which has seldom been observed after spine surgery. Here, we describe the case of a 70-year-old male who developed OS after SCS paddle implantation resulting in cecal perforation and multi-system organ failure with lethal outcome. We discuss the pathophysiology, present a method measuring the spinal canal to cord ratio (CCR) to prevent the risk of thoracic radiculopathy and OS after paddle SCS implantation, and propose suggestions for management and treatment of this condition.

Management of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction in a neutropenic patient.

Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction, also known as Ogilvie's syndrome, is a rare condition involving acute large bowel dilatation without mechanical obstruction. Management begins with conservative treatment and may include pharmacological therapy, colonoscopic decompression and surgery. Timely resolution is important due to the increased risk of bowel perforation and ischaemia associated with colonic dilatation. However, conditions such as neutropenia that place patients at an elevated risk of infection may limit treatment options. We report a case of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction in a neutropenic elderly man resistant to conservative measures and neostigmine and discuss the additional management considerations in an immunocompromised patient.

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy guideline on the role of endoscopy in the management of acute colonic pseudo-obstruction and colonic volvulus.

Colonic volvulus and acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) are 2 causes of benign large-bowel obstruction. Colonic volvulus occurs most commonly in the sigmoid colon as a result of bowel twisting along its mesenteric axis. In contrast, the exact pathophysiology of ACPO is poorly understood, with the prevailing hypothesis being altered regulation of colonic function by the autonomic nervous system resulting in colonic distention in the absence of mechanical blockage. Prompt diagnosis and intervention leads to improved outcomes for both diagnoses. Endoscopy may play a role in the evaluation and management of both entities. The purpose of this document from the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy's Standards of Practice Committee is to provide an update on the evaluation and endoscopic management of sigmoid volvulus and ACPO.

Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction Caused by Dexmedetomidine: A Case Report and Literature Review.

BACKGROUND Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) is an infrequent entity characterized by non-toxic, non-mechanical, abrupt, functional dilation of the colon. Clinically patients present with abdominal distention, anxiety, severe abdominal pain, nausea, and vomiting. This rare entity can lead to a fatal outcome if not recognized early. A high level of suspicions is paramount for early diagnosis and prompt intervention. CASE REPORT A 50-year-old male was admitted to the intensive unit care due to acute hypoxic respiratory failure, pneumonia, and septic shock requiring mechanical ventilation and intravenous vasopressors. Two weeks after admission, his clinical course deteriorated and was complicated with acute abdominal distension, pain, and ileus. Imaging confirmed acute onset of ileus and after ruling out metabolic and infectious causes, the diagnosis of ACPO was made. Aggressive medical and surgical management resulted in a favorable outcome. CONCLUSIONS Critically ill patients on ventilator are commonly sedated; therefore, usual symptoms of ACPO can be missed or misinterpreted leading to late diagnosis with increased morbidity and mortality. Clinicians must be aware of potential harm and side effects from common sedatives used in the intensive care unit and should be current on medical literature. Alpha-2 agonists, i.e., dexmedetomidine, is increasingly been used in critical care setting and there are few reports of a possible association with ACPO. We present here a case of a patient with dexmedetomidine-induced ACPO, and we provide a review of the existing literature and pathophysiology of the condition.

Ogilvie syndrome presenting with septic shock.

Özsoylu S, Akyildiz BN, Dursun A. Ogilvie syndrome presenting with septic shock. Turk J Pediatr 2018; 60: 225-227. Acute colonic pseudo-obstruction (ACPO) is also known as Ogilvie`s. We report a 10-year-old child with an unremarkable past history who presented with septic shock including hypotension, prolonged capillary refill time, decreased urine output ( < 0.5 ml/kg/h), metabolic acidosis, liver failure, respiratory failure. The symptoms resolved with supportive therapy. In our patient septic shock contributed to Ogilvie syndrome. Although it is a rare condition in pediatric population, pediatricians should be aware of children with abdominal distention; supportive management is successful and morbidity/mortality is minimal.

Secretory diarrhea and hypokalemia associated with colonic pseudo-obstruction: A case study and systematic analysis of the literature.

BACKGROUND: Colonic pseudo-obstruction (CPO) is characterized by colonic distention in the absence of mechanical obstruction or toxic megacolon. Concomitant secretory diarrhea (SD) with hypokalemia (SD-CPO) due to gastrointestinal (GI) loss requires further characterization. AIM: To perform a systematic review of SD-CPO, report a case study, and compare SD-CPO with classical CPO (C-CPO). METHODS: We performed a search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Scopus for reports based on a priori criteria for CPO, SD and GI loss of potassium. An additional case at Mayo Clinic was included. RESULTS: Nine publications met inclusion criteria, with a total of 14 cases. Six studies had high, three moderate, and our case high methodological quality. Median age was 74 years (66-97), with 2:1 male/female ratio. Kidney disease was present in 6/14 patients. Diarrhea was described as profuse, watery, or viscous in 10 patients. Median serum, stool, and urine potassium concentrations (mmol/L) were 2.4 (range: 1.9-3.1), 137 (100-180), and 17 (8-40), respectively. Maximal diameter of colon and cecum (median) were 10.2 cm and 10.5 cm, respectively. Conservative therapy alone was effective in five out of 14 patients. Median potassium supplementation was 124 mEq/d (40-300). Colonic decompression was effective in three out of six patients; one had a total colectomy; three out of 14 had died. The main differences between SD-CPO and C-CPO were lower responses to treatments: conservative measures (35.7% vs 73.6%, P=.01), neostigmine (17% vs 89.2%, P<.001), and colonic decompression (50% vs 82.4%, P=.02). CONCLUSION: SD-CPO is a rare phenotype associated with increased fecal potassium and is more difficult to treat than C-CPO.

Postpartum Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (Ogilvie's Syndrome): A systematic review of case reports and case series.

INTRODUCTION: Ogilvie's Syndrome or Acute Colonic Pseudo-Obstruction (ACPO) is a rare condition characterized by massive dilatation of the colon in the absence of mechanical obstruction. About 10% of all reported cases are related to Obstetric and Gynaecological procedures, Caesarean section being the commonest associated factor. Acute intestinal dilatation, if not treated, may lead to perforation and faecal peritonitis with consequent high morbidity and mortality. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An electronic literature searches were performed in PubMed, EMBASE, Google scholar and hand searches for relevant references were included without any language restriction. All the records reported after year 2002 were included for the full review. We analyzed the quality of the reports and the data was further analyzed for their respective risk factors, clinical features, management methods, morbidity and mortality. RESULTS: The results from our searches included a total of 125 cases of postpartum ACPO. A total of 66 cases were reported in 37 publications after year 2002. Details of delivery were recorded in 13(19%), clinical manifestations in 49(69%), imaging results in 43(65%) and management described in 100% of the cases. Although 62(92%) cases were following caesarean section, no specific antepartum or intrapartum factors were associated with ACPO. The caesarean sections performed for indications of preeclampsia, multiple pregnancy, antepartum haemorrhage/placenta previa were more in this group of patients who developed ACPO compared to caesarean sections performed for same indication in general population of England and Wales. Abdominal distension and pain were the commonest symptoms, followed by vomiting. Fever was common in patients with perforation. Twenty eight (43%) patients had intestinal perforation or impending perforation, and 31(47%) patients required laparotomy. Conservative management was successful in 33(50%) patients. All patients with a caecal diameter of more than 12cm perforated compared to 3/17 with a diameter of less than 9cm. Most perforations were diagnosed between postoperative day 3 and day 5. Only one case of mortality has been recorded (1.5%). CONCLUSIONS: No specific risk factors could be identified for postpartum ACPO. A postpartum patient with abdominal distension and pain should have appropriate imaging to rule out colonic dilatation and/or perforation. Perforation may occur with a caecal diameter of less than 9cm but it is more likely if the diameter exceeded 12cm. The mortality risk appears to be low in the postpartum group compared to other patients with ACPO. There is a need for establishing national level databases to capture all the relevant data in a consistent manner, to understand this rare disease process.

Obstrucción colónica secundaria a fecaloma de sigma resuelta endoscópicamente con Coca-Cola(R) / Colonic obstruction secondary to sigmoid fecaloma endoscopically resolved with Coca-Cola(R)

Introducción: la obstrucción colónica es una patología relativamente frecuente en el área de urgencias, con una mortalidad de hasta el 20%. En el 90% de los casos se debe a adenocarcinoma de colon o recto, vólvulo o estenosis secundaria a enfermedad diverticular. Respecto a la impactación de material fecal como causa de la misma es una entidad que suele manejarse forma conservadora, aunque en ocasiones puede complicarse y precisar incluso de intervención quirúrgica para su resolución. Basándonos en la efectividad demostrada de la Coca-Cola® para disolver fitobezoars gástricos planteamos su uso en un caso de obstrucción colónica secundaria a fecaloma de sigma. Caso clínico: se trata de una mujer de 58 años que acude a urgencias por cuadro de estreñimiento pertinaz de 6 días de evolución. En las pruebas radiológicas realizadas se demostró la presencia gran masa de material fecal impactada en colon sigmoides que condicionaba dilatación retrógrada de asas colónicas. Tras el fracaso de las medidas conservadoras con enemas de limpieza y lactulosa oral, se decidió desimpactar el fecaloma mediante colonoscopia valiéndonos de Coca-Cola®, que aplicamos con irrigaciones e inyección local. Esto disminuyó su consistencia y permitió la fragmentación con asa del fecaloma. Discusión: la Coca-Cola® ya se emplea para disolver fitobezoars gástricos. La composición similar de los fecalomas hace suponer que esta sea también efectiva como así fue en el caso de nuestra paciente, permitiendo no tener que intervenir a la paciente. Nuestro caso es el segundo publicado en el que la Coca-Cola® ayudó a la resolución de una obstrucción colónica secundaria a fecaloma (AU)

Background: Colonic obstruction is a relatively common condition in emergency care, with a mortality rate of up to 20%. In 90% of cases it results from colonic or rectal adenocarcinoma, volvulus, or stenosis secondary to diverticular disease. When fecal impaction is the underlying cause, the condition is usually managed conservatively, but may on occasion become complicated and even require surgical intervention. Based on the proven efficacy of Coca-Cola® to dissolve gastric phytobezoars, we report a case of colonic obstruction secondary to sigmoid fecaloma. Case report: A 58 years old woman arrived at the Emergency Room (ER) with persistent constipation for the last six days. An abdominal CT scan showed a large fecal mass at the sigmoid colon with retrograde dilated colonic loops. Cleansing enemas and oral lactulose were administered, which failed to resolve the clinical presentation, so we then proceeded to inject Coca-Cola® within the fecaloma using a sclerosing needle, and then washed the fecaloma surface also with Coca-Cola®. After a few minutes we started to fragment the fecalith, the consistency of which had been notably decreased. Discussion: The use of Coca-Cola® for gastric washes in the management of phytobezoars is well established. Since fecaliths are partly composed of these same substances than phytobezoars, the use of Coca-Cola® might well be warranted against them as in our patient, without surgery. Our case report is the second one published in the literature, in which Coca-Cola® helped solve colonic obstruction secondary to fecaloma (AU)

Colonoscopic decompression should be used before neostigmine in the treatment of Ogilvie's syndrome.

BACKGROUND: Performance of urgent colonoscopy for the purposes of diagnosis and treatment of Ogilvie's syndrome remains controversial. However, no trials have directly compared neostigmine with endoscopic therapy. This study aimed to compare the effect of neostigmine and colonoscopic decompression in the treatment of Ogilvie's syndrome. METHODS: This study was designed as a retrospective, non-randomized clinical study of sequential patients. Patients who were diagnosed as having acute colonic pseudo-obstruction were separated into two groups after conservative treatment. Group 1 comprised patients who underwent colonoscopic decompression, because they had a poor first response to neostigmine treatment. Group 2 constituted patients who had a poor first response to colonoscopic decompression, and neostigmine was added to the treatment regimen. Groups 1 and 2 were compared for the success of disease management. RESULTS: In groups 1 and 2, the average age of the patients was 63.19 years (±14.71 years) and 59.45 years (±15.31 years) (p = 0.312), respectively. No significant difference was determined between the groups in terms of distribution of sex, hospital stay, etiologies, and initial cecal sizes in imaging (p > 0.05). Response to first intervention was statistically significant (p < 0.01). Also, the total response was determined statistically significant for hospital stay if colonoscopic decompression was performed (p < 0.01). No recurrence was determined during the 1-month follow-up in both groups. Although there was no etiologic factor for neostigmine response according to univariate analysis results, colonoscopic success was decreased due to age, sex, and the presence of a cardiac disease. CONCLUSIONS: Although the success rate of neostigmine treatment was significantly lower in our homogeneous groups, no significant decrease was determined in terms of hospital stay, intensive care unit stay, and requirement of colostomy compared with colonoscopic decompression. By comparison, colonoscopic decompression, which was performed by experienced endoscopists as a first-line treatment option, was more effective as an initial therapy and was more effective at avoiding a second treatment modality.