Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 368
Filtrar
1.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241265199, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39095047

RESUMEN

Participation in complex listening situations such as group conversations in noisy environments sets high demands on the auditory system and on cognitive processing. Reports of hearing-impaired people indicate that strenuous listening situations occurring throughout the day lead to feelings of fatigue at the end of the day. The aim of the present study was to develop a suitable test sequence to evoke and measure listening effort (LE) and listening-related fatigue (LRF), and, to evaluate the influence of hearing aid use on both dimensions in mild to moderately hearing-impaired participants. The chosen approach aims to reconstruct a representative acoustic day (Time Compressed Acoustic Day [TCAD]) by means of an eight-part hearing-test sequence with a total duration of approximately 2½ h. For this purpose, the hearing test sequence combined four different listening tasks with five different acoustic scenarios and was presented to the 20 test subjects using virtual acoustics in an open field measurement in aided and unaided conditions. Besides subjective ratings of LE and LRF, behavioral measures (response accuracy, reaction times), and an attention test (d2-R) were performed prior to and after the TCAD. Furthermore, stress hormones were evaluated by taking salivary samples. Subjective ratings of LRF increased throughout the test sequence. This effect was observed to be higher when testing unaided. In three of the eight listening tests, the aided condition led to significantly faster reaction times/response accuracies than in the unaided condition. In the d2-R test, an interaction in processing speed between time (pre- vs. post-TCAD) and provision (unaided vs. aided) was found suggesting an influence of hearing aid provision on LRF. A comparison of the averaged subjective ratings at the beginning and end of the TCAD shows a significant increase in LRF for both conditions. At the end of the TCAD, subjective fatigue was significantly lower when wearing hearing aids. The analysis of stress hormones did not reveal significant effects.


Asunto(s)
Estimulación Acústica , Audífonos , Ruido , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Ruido/efectos adversos , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/instrumentación , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Atención , Personas con Deficiencia Auditiva/psicología , Personas con Deficiencia Auditiva/rehabilitación , Adulto , Fatiga Auditiva , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Reacción , Realidad Virtual , Percepción Auditiva/fisiología , Fatiga , Pérdida Auditiva/psicología , Pérdida Auditiva/rehabilitación , Pérdida Auditiva/fisiopatología , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Percepción del Habla/fisiología , Saliva/metabolismo , Saliva/química , Audición , Umbral Auditivo
2.
Trends Hear ; 28: 23312165241273346, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39195628

RESUMEN

There is broad consensus that listening effort is an important outcome for measuring hearing performance. However, there remains debate on the best ways to measure listening effort. This study sought to measure neural correlates of listening effort using functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) in experienced adult hearing aid users. The study evaluated impacts of amplification and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on cerebral blood oxygenation, with the expectation that easier listening conditions would be associated with less oxygenation in the prefrontal cortex. Thirty experienced adult hearing aid users repeated sentence-final words from low-context Revised Speech Perception in Noise Test sentences. Participants repeated words at a hard SNR (individual SNR-50) or easy SNR (individual SNR-50 + 10 dB), while wearing hearing aids fit to prescriptive targets or without wearing hearing aids. In addition to assessing listening accuracy and subjective listening effort, prefrontal blood oxygenation was measured using fNIRS. As expected, easier listening conditions (i.e., easy SNR, with hearing aids) led to better listening accuracy, lower subjective listening effort, and lower oxygenation across the entire prefrontal cortex compared to harder listening conditions. Listening accuracy and subjective listening effort were also significant predictors of oxygenation.


Asunto(s)
Audífonos , Espectroscopía Infrarroja Corta , Percepción del Habla , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Percepción del Habla/fisiología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Relación Señal-Ruido , Estimulación Acústica/métodos , Corteza Prefrontal/fisiología , Personas con Deficiencia Auditiva/psicología , Personas con Deficiencia Auditiva/rehabilitación , Ruido/efectos adversos , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/instrumentación , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Audición/fisiología , Circulación Cerebrovascular/fisiología , Umbral Auditivo/fisiología , Inteligibilidad del Habla/fisiología
3.
Am J Audiol ; 33(2): 606-610, 2024 Jun 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38648534

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: The purpose of this article is to provide a viewpoint on the recently published results showing the positive effect hearing intervention can have on mitigating the risk of cognitive decline in elderly individuals with hearing impairment. We intend to trigger a broader discussion on the implications of these results from an implementation science perspective. METHODS: Recently published results were reviewed and contextualized. RESULTS: In our view, these recent findings provide a great opportunity for hearing care professionals to change the perspective on hearing care being an essential service that contributes not only to managing challenges with audibility but to enabling healthy living and aging. CONCLUSION: As exciting as these findings are, from our perspective, they are also a call to action for the audiology field in terms of clinical implementation science. The findings guide us toward a more interprofessional approach in order to develop and test new, more holistic models of hearing care.


Asunto(s)
Disfunción Cognitiva , Pérdida Auditiva , Humanos , Pérdida Auditiva/rehabilitación , Disfunción Cognitiva/terapia , Anciano , Audífonos , Audiología , Cognición , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos
4.
J Laryngol Otol ; 138(6): 621-626, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38456642

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Bone conduction hearing implants are a well-established method of hearing rehabilitation in children and adults. This study aimed to review any changes in provision in England. METHODS: The total number of bone conduction hearing implantations performed was analysed from 2012 to 2021 utilising Hospital Episode Statistics data for England. RESULTS: The total number of procedures has increased by 58 per cent. One-stage bone conduction hearing implantations in adults accounts for the largest proportion of this increase (93 per cent of the total). The number performed in children has remained stable and accounts for 73 per cent (n = 433) of all two-stage procedures. CONCLUSION: The data show that bone conduction hearing implant surgery is becoming increasingly popular, particularly in adults. This has correlated with the increase in availability, national recommendations and choice of devices.


Asunto(s)
Conducción Ósea , Humanos , Conducción Ósea/fisiología , Niño , Adulto , Inglaterra , Audífonos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Preescolar , Pérdida Auditiva/cirugía , Pérdida Auditiva/rehabilitación , Pérdida Auditiva/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino
5.
HNO ; 72(6): 412-422, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Alemán | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38358482

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The Association of the Scientific Medical Societies in Germany (AWMF) clinical practice guideline on cochlear implant (CI) treatment, which was updated in 2020, defined the entire process of CI care for the first time. In the present study, the feasibility and results of very early rehabilitation were examined. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The intervention group (IG) comprised 54 patients in whom rehabilitation was initiated within 14 (maximally 28) days after implantation. Patients with a significantly longer waiting time were included in the control group (CG, n = 21). In addition to the start and duration of rehabilitation, the speech intelligibility achieved with CI was recorded at different timepoints within a 12-month period. In addition, questionnaires were used to assess the effort of fitting the CI processor and the patients' satisfaction with the outcome as well as the timing of the start of rehabilitation. RESULTS: Median waiting time between implantation and start of rehabilitation was 14 days in the IG and 106 days in the CG; 92.6% of IG patients were able to start rehabilitation within 14 days. The effect of rehabilitation in the IG was 35 and in the CG 25 percentage points (Freiburg monosyllabic test). After 6 and 12 months of CI use, both groups showed comparable results in the test condition in quiet (IG/CG 6 months: 70%/70%; 12 months: 70%/60%, Freiburg monosyllabic test) and in noise (IG/CG 6 months: -1.1-0.85 dB SNR; 12 months: -0.65 dB SNR/0.3 dB SNR, Oldenburg sentence test). Hearing quality assessment scores collected by SSQ (Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale) questionnaire showed better scores in the IG at 6 months, which converged to CG scores at 12 months. The IG was significantly more satisfied with the timing of the start of rehab than the CG. All other data obtained from questionnaires showed no differences between the two groups. CONCLUSION: A very early start of inpatient rehabilitation after cochlear implantation was successfully implemented. The rehabilitation was completed within 7 weeks of CI surgery. Comparison of speech recognition test results before and after rehabilitation showed a significant improvement. A clear rehabilitation effect can therefore be demonstrated. Inclusion of CI rehabilitation in the German catalog of follow-up treatments is thus scientifically justified and therefore strongly recommended.


Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear , Estudios de Factibilidad , Humanos , Alemania , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Implantación Coclear/rehabilitación , Adulto , Cuidados Posteriores/métodos , Implantes Cocleares , Anciano , Satisfacción del Paciente , Adulto Joven , Hospitalización , Sordera/rehabilitación , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos
6.
Ear Hear ; 45(1): 164-173, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37491715

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Speech perception training can be a highly effective intervention to improve perception and language abilities in children who are deaf or hard of hearing. Most studies of speech perception training, however, only measure gains immediately following training. Only a minority of cases include a follow-up assessment after a period without training. A critical unanswered question was whether training-related benefits are retained for a period of time after training has stopped. A primary goal of this investigation was to determine whether children retained training-related benefits 4 to 6 weeks after they completed 16 hours of formal speech perception training. Training was comprised of either auditory or speechreading training, or a combination of both. Also important is to determine if "booster" training can help increase gains made during the initial intensive training period. Another goal of the study was to investigate the benefits of providing home-based booster training during the 4- to 6-week interval after the formal training ceased. The original investigation ( Tye-Murray et al. 2022 ) compared the effects of talker familiarity and the relative benefits of the different types of training. We predicted that the children who received no additional training would retain the gains after the completing the formal training. We also predicted that those children who completed the booster training would realize additional gains. DESIGN: Children, 6 to 12 years old, with hearing loss who had previously participated in the original randomized control study returned 4 to 6 weeks after the conclusion to take a follow-up speech perception assessment. The first group (n = 44) returned after receiving no formal intervention from the research team before the follow-up assessment. A second group of 40 children completed an additional 16 hours of speech perception training at home during a 4- to 6-week interval before the follow-up speech perception assessment. The home-based speech perception training was a continuation of the same training that was received in the laboratory formatted to work on a PC tablet with a portable speaker. The follow-up speech perception assessment included measures of listening and speechreading, with test items spoken by both familiar (trained) and unfamiliar (untrained) talkers. RESULTS: In the group that did not receive the booster training, follow-up testing showed retention for all gains that were obtained immediately following the laboratory-based training. The group that received booster training during the same interval also maintained the benefits from the formal training, with some indication of minor improvement. CONCLUSIONS: Clinically, the present findings are extremely encouraging; the group that did not receive home-based booster training retained the benefits obtained during the laboratory-based training regimen. Moreover, the results suggest that self-paced booster training maintained the relative training gains associated with talker familiarity and training type seen immediately following laboratory-based training. Future aural rehabilitation programs should include maintenance training at home to supplement the speech perception training conducted under more formal conditions at school or in the clinic.


Asunto(s)
Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva , Sordera , Pérdida Auditiva , Percepción del Habla , Niño , Humanos , Pérdida Auditiva/rehabilitación , Lectura de los Labios , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos
7.
Recurso de Internet en Portugués | LIS - Localizador de Información en Salud | ID: lis-48697

RESUMEN

Na semana da celebração do Dia Mundial da Audição, o Ministério da Saúde reforça o alerta para a importância do diagnóstico precoce de doenças que podem afetar o sistema auditivo. É essencial protegê-lo e para isso o Sistema Único de Saúde (SUS) oferece de forma integral e gratuita procedimentos que vão desde o Teste da Orelhinha até a reabilitação auditiva.


Asunto(s)
Recién Nacido , Sistema Único de Salud/organización & administración , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos
8.
Int J Audiol ; 61(12): 984-992, 2022 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34747668

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the experiences and perceptions of adults with hearing impairment and family members regarding the role of family in audiological rehabilitation. DESIGN: A qualitative descriptive methodology was used. STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 37 people participated, 24 older adults with hearing impairment and 13 family members (11 spouses and 2 adult children). Four focus group interviews were conducted with the adults with hearing impairment, and 3 with family members. RESULTS: Five key themes emerged from analysis of the transcripts: (1) knowledge and understanding of hearing impairment and treatment; (2) the role of family members in rehabilitation is complex and multifaceted; (3) audiologists have an influential role in facilitating family member involvement; (4) the role of communication in rehabilitation; and (5) outcomes of family member involvement. Importantly, although perceptions were generally very positive, there was some uncertainty about the role of family. CONCLUSIONS: Audiologists have a key role in facilitating family involvement in audiological rehabilitation that is identified by adults with hearing impairment and their families. Although participants reported limited involvement in audiological rehabilitation currently, they identified potential for involvement in areas such as goal setting and decision-making.


Asunto(s)
Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva , Pérdida Auditiva , Anciano , Humanos , Audiólogos , Comunicación , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Familia , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva/rehabilitación , Hijos Adultos
9.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 42(6): 103060, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33932625

RESUMEN

Patients with single sided deafness (SSD) struggle with sound localization and speech in noise. Existing treatment options include contralateral routing of signal (CROS) systems, percutaneous bone conduction hearing devices (BCHDs), passive transcutaneous BCHDs, active BCHDs, and cochlear implants. Implanted devices provide benefits in speech in noise compared to CROS devices. Percutaneous BCHDs transmit sound efficiently but have aesthetic drawbacks and skin complications. Scalp attenuation impacts passive transcutaneous BCHD performance. Active BCHDs overcome these issues and provide benefits for speech in noise. Cochlear implantation is the only existing option that restores binaural input but introduces electrical rather than acoustic stimuli to the deaf ear. Active BCHDs have been designed to maintain efficient sound transmission and avoid chronic skin irritation and cosmetic concerns that may occur with percutaneous BCHDs. Cochlear implantation may be a superior option for recently deafened SSD patients, though this requires further study. The duration of deafness, patient age and comorbidities, and a shared decision-making model among patients, surgeons, and audiologists should be considered in device selection. The aim of this manuscript is to review available devices, discuss surgical considerations for implantable devices, review available published results for speech in noise and sound quality with each device, and provide an overview to guide shared decision making for patients and providers. This review consolidates available literature and reviews experience with a newer active transcutaneous active BCHD available for use in the SSD population.


Asunto(s)
Conducción Ósea , Implantación Coclear , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Audífonos , Pérdida Auditiva Unilateral/rehabilitación , Estimulación Acústica , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/instrumentación , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Unilateral/fisiopatología , Pérdida Auditiva Unilateral/psicología , Pérdida Auditiva Unilateral/cirugía , Pruebas Auditivas , Humanos , Masculino , Localización de Sonidos , Habla
10.
J Laryngol Otol ; 135(4): 304-309, 2021 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33745469

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate hearing outcomes and device safety in a large, single-surgeon experience with the totally implantable active middle-ear implants. METHODS: This was a retrospective case series review of 116 patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss undergoing implantation of active middle-ear implants. RESULTS: Mean baseline unaided pure tone average improved from 57.6 dB before surgery to 34.1 dB post-operatively, signifying a mean gain in pure tone average of 23.5 dB (p = 0.0002). Phonetically balanced maximum word recognition score improved slightly from 70.5 per cent to 75.8 per cent (p = 0.416), and word recognition score at a hearing level of 50 dB values increased substantially from 14.4 per cent to 70.4 per cent (p < 0.0001). Both revision and explant rates were low and dropped with increasing surgeon experience over time. CONCLUSION: This study showed excellent post-operative hearing results with active middle-ear implants with regard to pure tone average and word recognition score at a hearing level of 50 db. Complication rates in this case series were significantly lower with increasing experience of the surgeon. Active middle-ear implants should be considered in appropriate patients with moderate-to-severe sensorineural hearing loss who have struggled with conventional amplification and are good surgical candidates.


Asunto(s)
Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Oído Medio/cirugía , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/rehabilitación , Prótesis Osicular , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Femenino , Audición , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
11.
Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol ; 130(9): 1093-1099, 2021 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33615825

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The effect of hearing aid use on the evolution of presbycusis has not been well described in the literature, with only a handful of publications addressing this topic. This paper aims to evaluate the long-term use of amplification and its effect on pure-tone thresholds and word recognition scores. METHOD: Monaurally fitted patients were followed with serial audiograms. Data was collected from hearing aid centers. Seventy-seven patients with presbycusis met the inclusion criteria and participated in the present study. The progression of hearing loss in both pure tone thresholds and word recognition scores were compared between the hearing aid ears (HA), and the non-hearing aid ears (NHA). Pure tone thresholds were analyzed by comparing the pure tone average at the initial and last audiograms. Word Recognition Scores (WRS) were analyzed using the model of Thornton and Raffin (1978), and by comparing the change in the absolute values of WRS from the initial to the last audiogram between the HA ear and the NHA ear. RESULTS: No significant difference in pure-tone thresholds between the HA ear and NHA ear was found at the last audiogram (P = .696), even after dividing the patients into groups based on the duration of amplification. Both methods of analysis of patients' WRS showed a statistically significant worsening in NHA (P < .05). CONCLUSION: The present study supports the previously defined auditory deprivation effect on non-fitted ears, which showed worsening of word recognition over time and no effect on pure tone average. It provides an additional argument for the counseling of patients with presbycusis considering amplification, and highlights the importance of bilateral amplification in preserving the residual hearing of hearing impaired patients.


Asunto(s)
Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Audífonos , Presbiacusia/rehabilitación , Percepción del Habla , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Presbiacusia/fisiopatología , Factores de Tiempo
12.
Int J Audiol ; 60(5): 322-327, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33000663

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The Audiology Department at the Royal Surrey County Hospital usually offers face-to-face audiologist-delivered cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT) for tinnitus rehabilitation. During COVID-19 lockdown, patients were offered telehealth CBT via video using a web-based platform. This study evaluated the proportion of patients who took up the offer of telehealth sessions and factors related to this. DESIGN: Retrospective service evaluation. STUDY SAMPLE: 113 consecutive patients whose care was interrupted by the lockdown. RESULTS: 80% of patients accepted telehealth. The main reasons for declining were not having access to a suitable device and the belief that telehealth appointments would not be useful. Compared to having no hearing loss in the better ear, having a mild or moderate hearing loss increased the chance of declining telehealth by factors of 3.5 (p = 0.04) and 14.9 (p = 0.038), respectively. High tinnitus annoyance as measured via the visual analogue scale increased the chance of declining telehealth appointments by a factor of 1.4 (p = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS: Although CBT via telehealth was acceptable to most patients, alternatives may be necessary for the 20% who declined. These tended to have worse hearing in their better ear and more annoying tinnitus.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Terapia Cognitivo-Conductual/métodos , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Telerrehabilitación/métodos , Acúfeno/rehabilitación , Adulto , Femenino , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Pérdida Auditiva/psicología , Pérdida Auditiva/rehabilitación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , SARS-CoV-2 , Acúfeno/complicaciones , Acúfeno/psicología , Reino Unido
13.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 100(3_suppl): 215S-219S, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31838921

RESUMEN

The aim of this article is to describe the audiological patterns of 71 adult patients presenting severe to profound sensorineural hearing loss, who were rehabilitated by cochlear implants (CIs) and hearing aids. This is a retrospective study in a university setting, where the clinical records of 71 adult patients were reviewed and processed. Speech intelligibility was evaluated at one aided ear (CI) or at both aided ears (double CI or a combination of CI and hearing aid [HA]). Patients with a bilateral CI or with a bimodal hearing setup (CI and HA) performed better than those with a single CI; data from the phonetic matrices test showed that there was a statistically significant difference among patients aided by a single CI versus binaural setup (double CI or CI + HA). In particular, patients aided by a bilateral CI, or by a CI and HA, showed an improvement in the functional results of the speech tests, compared to patients using a single CI. Binaural hearing (either with a bilateral CI or bimodal) allows an improvement in the functional results at the speech tests, compared to the use of a CI only.


Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear , Implantes Cocleares , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Audífonos , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/rehabilitación , Adulto , Anciano , Umbral Auditivo , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/instrumentación , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Sensorineural/fisiopatología , Pruebas Auditivas , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Inteligibilidad del Habla , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
14.
Ear Nose Throat J ; 100(3_suppl): 199S-203S, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31565979

RESUMEN

Bone conduction implants based on percutaneous abutment acoustic transmission have been implemented in patients with satisfactory outcomes. However, adverse soft tissue outcomes present a limitation. Transcutaneous bone conduction devices (t-BCDs) are an alternative that may mitigate these complications. A retrospective review was performed of patients who underwent implantation of a t-BCD from 2013 to 2017. Surgical outcomes were reviewed including wound complications, frequency of device use, patient concerns regarding the device, and reported patient satisfaction. A total of 37 patients were implanted with the bone-anchored hearing aids, BAHA Attract (Cochlear™ Baha® Implant System). Average follow-up time was 271.8 days. Postoperatively, 7 (18.9%) patients complained of soft tissue changes or issues with wound healing. Twelve (32.4%) patients requested adjustment of their devices. The t-BCD is an excellent option for hearing rehabilitation. Overall, the complication rate is low, patient satisfaction is high, and successful conversion from a percutaneous device is possible with minimal risk.


Asunto(s)
Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/instrumentación , Audífonos , Pérdida Auditiva Conductiva/rehabilitación , Implantación de Prótesis/instrumentación , Adolescente , Adulto , Conducción Ósea , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Femenino , Pérdida Auditiva Conductiva/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Satisfacción del Paciente , Implantación de Prótesis/efectos adversos , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
15.
Am J Audiol ; 29(3S): 638-647, 2020 Sep 18.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32946251

RESUMEN

Purpose The SUpport PRogram (SUPR) study was carried out in the context of a private academic partnership and is the first study to evaluate the long-term effects of a communication program (SUPR) for older hearing aid users and their communication partners on a large scale in a hearing aid dispensing setting. The purpose of this research note is to reflect on the lessons that we learned during the different development, implementation, and evaluation phases of the SUPR project. Procedure This research note describes the procedures that were followed during the different phases of the SUPR project and provides a critical discussion to describe the strengths and weaknesses of the approach taken. Conclusion This research note might provide researchers and intervention developers with useful insights as to how aural rehabilitation interventions, such as the SUPR, can be developed by incorporating the needs of the different stakeholders, evaluated by using a robust research design (including a large sample size and a longer term follow-up assessment), and implemented widely by collaborating with a private partner (hearing aid dispensing practice chain).


Asunto(s)
Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Audífonos , Pérdida Auditiva/rehabilitación , Intervención basada en la Internet , Automanejo , Humanos , Ciencia de la Implementación , Educación del Paciente como Asunto , Evaluación de Procesos, Atención de Salud , Desarrollo de Programa , Evaluación de Programas y Proyectos de Salud , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto
16.
Int J Audiol ; 59(8): 598-605, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32579038

RESUMEN

Objective: Parental views about the outcomes of implantation on the child's quality of life are valuable sources of information for implantation specialists. The aim at this study was to validate the "Parental Perspectives" questionnaire in Persian language.Design: The original questionnaire was translated from English to Persian language; the final Persian version of questionnaire was prepared and evaluated for validity and reliability. The internal consistency of the questionnaire and test-retest reliability were respectively evaluated by Cronbach's alpha and ICC index. Factor analysis was used to determine the construct validity.Study Sample: The participants of this study were 370 parents of CI children.Results: Sampling adequacy for executing of factor analysis was confirmed by the results of Kaiser-Meyer-Olkin (=0.84) and Bartlett test (p < .05). Three factors were extracted from exploratory factor analysis. Confirmatory factor analysis confirmed the accuracy of the three-dimensional structures. Principal component analysis revealed the structural validity of three factors. Correlation between questionnaire items was good (r = 0.76). Reliability coefficient was calculated as 0.93.Conclusions: The Persian version of the questionnaire has good validity and reliability and can be used to examine the perspectives of the parents about CI.


Asunto(s)
Implantes Cocleares/psicología , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/psicología , Sordera/rehabilitación , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios/normas , Adolescente , Niño , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Sordera/psicología , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Humanos , Irán , Lenguaje , Masculino , Padres/psicología , Psicometría , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Traducciones , Resultado del Tratamiento
17.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 21(5): 275-280, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32476613

RESUMEN

Objective: To collect figures on the numbers of children and adults receiving cochlear implants across Europe, compare the figures for 2016 with those for 2010, and identify any trends. Materials and methods: In 2018 EURO-CIU invited their 23 member countries to conduct a survey collecting data on the number of CI recipients in 2016 and 2017. Data were received from 15 countries, representing more than 100 000 CI recipients in Europe. Results: For paediatric CI, there was an increase in nearly all European countries (except Denmark, the UK and Luxembourg) between 2010 and 2016. We found an annual figure of one CI per 1000 newborns common in most countries where reimbursement of paediatric CI's is available. Conversely the adult data reveals no increase between 2010 and 2016 and the data is less homogeneous than the paediatric data with huge differences across countries. Conclusion: There is little agreement on data on numbers of CI across Europe, which makes it difficult to plan public health policy, funding or services. In all European countries included in this study (except Germany) there needs to be work on raising more awareness of adult hearing loss and adult cochlear implantation to improve access.


Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear/tendencias , Implantes Cocleares/tendencias , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/tendencias , Pérdida Auditiva/cirugía , Adulto , Niño , Preescolar , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Pediatría/tendencias , Prevalencia
18.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 21(5): 246-259, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32515304

RESUMEN

Objective: We conducted a long-term follow-up study to investigate the time course of residual hearing in our first 21 consecutively operated cochlear implant (CI) patients using the round window (RW) approach . The study may provide additional information about the influence of a flexible lateral wall electrode array on cochlear function. Methods: Data were available for long-term follow-up (>5 years) in 15 patients. Pure tone audiometry (PTA) was assessed at 0.125-8 kHz preoperatively, and at one, three and >5 years postoperatively. Insertion angle, number of electrodes inside the cochlea, user-time of the processor and stimulation strategy were documented. Results: Twelve out of 15 patients had residual hearing after a follow-up period of five years (mean 86 months, range: 61-103 months). Four out of 15 patients had >75% complete hearing preservation (HP), 8 out of 15 had 25-75% partial HP and 3 out of 15 patients had complete loss of hearing. There was a high correlation between insertion angle and HP. Conclusion: Long-term HP was possible in 12 out of 15 cases. Even patients with complete hearing loss at long-term follow-up showed high performance in speech understanding and were full-time users.


Asunto(s)
Implantación Coclear/métodos , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Pérdida Auditiva/cirugía , Audición , Ventana Redonda/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Audiometría de Tonos Puros , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pérdida Auditiva/fisiopatología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Percepción del Habla , Suecia , Tiempo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
19.
Int J Audiol ; 59(6): 416-426, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32091274

RESUMEN

Objective: To investigate the relation of a hearing-specific patient-reported outcome measure (PROM) with speech perception and noise tolerance measurements. It was hypothesised that speech intelligibility in noise and noise tolerance may explain a larger part of the variance in PROM scores than speech intelligibility in quiet.Design: This cross-sectional study used the Speech, Spatial, Qualities (SSQ) questionnaire as a PROM. Speech recognition in quiet, the Speech Reception Threshold in noise and noise tolerance as measured with the acceptable noise level (ANL) were measured with sentences.Study sample: A group of 48 unilateral post-lingual deafened cochlear implant (CI) users.Results: SSQ scores were moderately correlated with speech scores in quiet and noise, and also with ANLs. Speech scores in quiet and noise were strongly correlated. The combination of speech scores and ANL explained 10-30% of the variances in SSQ scores, with ANLs adding only 0-9%.Conclusions: The variance in the SSQ as hearing-specific PROM in CI users was not better explained by speech intelligibility in noise than by speech intelligibility in quiet, because of the remarkably strong correlation between both measures. ANLs made only a small contribution to explain the variance of the SSQ. ANLs seem to measure other aspects than the SSQ.


Asunto(s)
Implantes Cocleares , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/estadística & datos numéricos , Sordera/rehabilitación , Pruebas Auditivas/estadística & datos numéricos , Prueba del Umbral de Recepción del Habla/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Implantación Coclear , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Audición , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ruido , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Percepción del Habla , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento
20.
Cochlear Implants Int ; 21(5): 299-305, 2020 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31530099

RESUMEN

Objective: To assess whether CI programming by means of a software application using artificial intelligence (AI), FOX®, may improve cochlear implant (CI) performance. Patients: Two adult CI recipients who had mixed auditory results with their manual fitting were selected for an AI-assisted fitting. Even after 17 months CI experience and 19 manual fitting sessions, the first subject hadn't developed open set word recognition. The second subject, after 9 months of manual fitting, had developed good open set word recognition, but his scores remained poor at soft and loud presentation levels. Main outcome measure(s): Cochlear implant fitting parameters, pure tone thresholds, bisyllabic word recognition, phonemic discrimination scores and loudness scaling curves. Results: For subject 1, a first approach trying to optimize the home maps by means of AI-proposed adaptations was not successful whereas a second approach based on the use of Automaps (an AI approach based on universal, i.e. population based group statistics) during 3 months allowed the development of open set word recognition. For subject 2, the word recognition scores improved at soft and loud intensities with the AI suggestions. The AI-suggested modifications seem to be atypical. Conclusions: The two case studies illustrate that adults implanted with manual CI fitting may experience an improvement in their auditory results with AI-assisted fitting.


Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Implantes Cocleares , Corrección de Deficiencia Auditiva/métodos , Sordera/rehabilitación , Ajuste de Prótesis/métodos , Anciano , Umbral Auditivo , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Programas Informáticos , Percepción del Habla
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA