Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 257
Filtrar
1.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 76: 269-275, 2021 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34175419

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Stroke is a leading cause of death worldwide, with carotid atherosclerosis accounting for 10-20% of cases. In Brazil, the Public Health System provides care for roughly two-thirds of the population. No studies, however, have analysed large-scale results of carotid bifurcation surgery in Brazil. METHODS: This study aimed to describe rates of carotid artery stenting (CAS) and carotid endarterectomy (CEA) performed between 2008 and 2019 in the country through web scraping of publicly available databases. RESULTS: Between 2008 and 2019, 37,424 carotid bifurcation revascularization procedures were performed, of which 22,578 were CAS (60.34%) and 14,846 (39.66%) were CEA. There were 620 in-hospital deaths (1.66%), 336 after CAS (1.48%) and 284 after CEA (1.92%) (P = 0.032). Governmental reimbursement was US$ 77,216,298.85 (79.31% of all reimbursement) for CAS procedures and US$ 20,143,009.63 (20.69%) for CEA procedures. The average cost per procedure for CAS (US$ 3,062.98) was higher than that for CEA (US$ 1,430.33) (P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: In Brazil, the frequency of CAS largely surpassed that of CEA. In-hospital mortality rates of CAS were significantly lower than those of CEA, although both had mortality rates within the acceptable rates as dictated by literature. The cost of CAS, however, was significantly higher. This is a pioneering analysis of carotid artery disease management in Brazil that provides, for the first time, preliminary insight into the fact that the low adoption of CEA in the country is in opposition to countries where utilization rates are higher for CEA than for CAS.


Asunto(s)
Estenosis Carotídea/terapia , Endarterectomía Carotidea/tendencias , Procedimientos Endovasculares/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Salud Pública/tendencias , Stents/tendencias , Brasil/epidemiología , Estenosis Carotídea/diagnóstico por imagen , Estenosis Carotídea/economía , Estenosis Carotídea/mortalidad , Ahorro de Costo/tendencias , Análisis Costo-Beneficio/tendencias , Endarterectomía Carotidea/efectos adversos , Endarterectomía Carotidea/economía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Endovasculares/economía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/mortalidad , Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Mortalidad Hospitalaria/tendencias , Humanos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Salud Pública/economía , Investigación en Sistemas de Salud Pública , Estudios Retrospectivos , Stents/economía , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento
3.
An. sist. sanit. Navar ; 43(2): 151-157, mayo-ago. 2020. tab, graf
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-199146

RESUMEN

FUNDAMENTO: Evaluar si la implantación de un protocolo de masas anexiales basado en el sistema GI-RADS permite un correcto manejo de estas, evitando la actividad clínicamente innecesaria derivada del sobrediagnóstico y sobretratamiento, así como un ahorro en los costes. MÉTODO: Estudio de cohortes retrospectivo (julio 2015 - junio 2017). Incluyó mujeres atendidas en la consulta de Ginecología del Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos (Móstoles, Madrid) con hallazgo de una masa anexial en ecografía de alta resolución. La masa anexial se catalogó con el sistema GI-RADS y, junto con la imagen ecográfica y el estatus menopáusico de la paciente, se decidió realizar cirugía o seguimiento. RESULTADOS: Se estudiaron 154 mujeres, el 24 % con imágenes sospechosas de malignidad (G4 y G5). Se intervinieron un 33,1 % de las masas anexiales, el 33,3 % de las cuales fueron cáncer de ovario, principalmente en mujeres postmenopáusicas con una imagen ecográfica sospechosa de malignidad (88,2 %). Un 3,2 % de las pacientes rechazaron la indicación de cirugía. Durante el seguimiento desaparecieron el 21,4 % de las masas anexiales, 61 pacientes (39,6 %) no habían sido intervenidas por presentar una masa anexial estable, y dos (1,3 %) por el riesgo quirúrgico. Al final del estudio se evitaron 96 (62,3 %) cirugías, logrando una reducción de costes de 57.683 euros. CONCLUSIONES: La aplicación de un protocolo basado en el sistema de clasificación GI-RADS evitó cirugías innecesarias y las consecuencias y costes derivados de ellas, por lo que constituye una herramienta útil y práctica en el control y tratamiento de las masas anexiales.Palabras clave. Masa anexial. Clasificación GI-RADS. Cirugías innecesarias. Seguridad del paciente


BACKGROUND: Evaluate whether the implementation of an adnexal masses protocol, based on the GI-RADS system, allows a correct management of these masses, avoiding unnecessary clinical activity produced by overdiagnosis and overtreatment, as well as cost savings. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study (July 2015 - June 2017) including women treated at the Gynaecology clinic of the Hospital Universitario Rey Juan Carlos (Móstoles, Madrid), with detection of an adnexal mass in high resolution echography. Adnexal masses were classified by the GI-RADS system, and together with the echographic image and menopausal status, surgery or follow-up was decided. RESULTS: A total of 154 women were studied, 24 % with images suggesting malignancy (G4 and G5). Surgery was performed on 33.1 % of adnexal masses; 33.3 % of them were ovarian carcinoma, mainly (88.2 %) in postmenopausal women with echographic images suggesting malignancy. Three point two percent of patients rejected the recommended surgery. During follow-up 21.4 % of the masses disappeared, 61 patients were only monitored due to a stable mass and two (1.3 %) due to surgical risk. Eventually, 96 (62.3 %) surgeries were avoided, achieving a 57,683 Euro saving. CONCLUSIONS: The application of a protocol based on the GI-RADS classification system avoided unnecessary surgeries, as well as the consequences and economical cost produced by them. Thus, this protocol is a useful and practical tool for the monitoring and treatment of adnexal masses


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anexos Uterinos/patología , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Uterinas/cirugía , Procedimientos Innecesarios/clasificación , Ahorro de Costo/tendencias , Neoplasias Uterinas/diagnóstico por imagen , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Estadificación de Neoplasias/métodos , Protocolos Antineoplásicos , Árboles de Decisión , Estudios Retrospectivos
4.
Gac. sanit. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 34(3): 261-267, mayo-jun. 2020. tab
Artículo en Español | IBECS | ID: ibc-196617

RESUMEN

OBJETIVO: Conocer la valoración de personas migrantes sobre su acceso al sistema sanitario tras la entrada en vigor del Real Decreto-Ley16/2012 y sobre el efecto que han podido producir los recortes económicos en dicho acceso. MÉTODO: Estudio cualitativo fenomenológico con entrevistas semiestructuradas, realizado en Andalucía, en dos fases (2009-2010 y 2012-2013), con 36 participantes. Se segmentó la muestra por tiempo de estancia, nacionalidad y ámbito de residencia. Las nacionalidades de las personas migrantes son Bolivia, Marruecos y Rumanía. RESULTADOS: Como elementos facilitadores del acceso en ambas fases se identifican la situación administrativa regular, la posesión de tarjeta sanitaria individual, el conocimiento del idioma, las redes sociales y la información. Los resultados muestran diferencias en el acceso a la atención sanitaria de las personas migrantes antes y después de la aplicación del RDL 16/2012, en el marco de las políticas de austeridad. En la segunda fase se agravan algunas barreras de acceso, como los tiempos de espera y la incompatibilidad de horarios, y empeoran las condiciones socioeconómicas y administrativas de las personas participantes. CONCLUSIONES: El diseño de políticas económicas y de regulación de la atención sanitaria debería tener en cuenta las barreras y los facilitadores de acceso como ejes fundamentales de la protección de la salud de las personas migrantes y, por ende, de la población general


OBJECTIVE: To conduct an assessment of migrant people regarding their access to the health system following entry into force of Royal Decree-Law 16/2012 along with the impact of economic cuts on such access. METHOD: Qualitative phenomenological study with semi-structured interviews, conducted in Andalusia (Spain), in two phases (2009-2010 and 2012-2013), with 36 participants. The sample was segmented by length of stay, nationality and area of residence. The nationalities of origin are Bolivia, Morocco and Romania. RESULTS: Elements facilitating access in both periods: regular administrative situation, possession of Individual Health Card, knowledge of the language, social networks and information. The results show differences in access to health care for migrants before and after the enforcement of the RDL 16/2012, within austerity policies. In the second period, access barriers such as waiting times or incompatibility of schedules are aggravated and the socio-economic and administrative conditions of participants worsen. CONCLUSIONS: The design of policies, economic and regulatory health care, should take into account barriers and facilitators of access as fundamental main points of health protection for migrants and, therefore, for the general population


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Ahorro de Costo/tendencias , Recursos Financieros en Salud/provisión & distribución , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/tendencias , Migrantes/estadística & datos numéricos , Salud de las Minorías/tendencias , Recesión Económica/estadística & datos numéricos , España/epidemiología , 50207 , Investigación Cualitativa
5.
Diabetes Care ; 43(8): 1767-1773, 2020 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32527798

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Lantus, the reference insulin glargine used for the treatment of diabetes, lost its patent protection in 2014, opening the market to biosimilar competitors. OBJECTIVE: First, to analyze the adoption rates of insulin glargine biosimilars in primary care in England and estimate the savings realized and missed, since an insulin glargine biosimilar was first used, and second, to assess potential variations in adoption rates across Clinical Commissioning Groups (CCGs). RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Data sets capturing information on all insulin glargine items prescribed by all general practitioners up to December 2018 were used. Total costs of insulin glargine and uptake rates of biosimilars were calculated. The real-world budget impact was estimated assuming the cost of reference insulin glargine for all items and comparing the total costs in this scenario with the total costs in the real world. The missed savings were estimated assuming the cost of biosimilars for all insulin glargine items. Choropleth maps were generated to assess potential variations in uptake across CCGs. RESULTS: Insulin glargine biosimilars generated savings of £900,000 between October 2015 (time of first prescription) and December 2018. The missed savings amounted to £25.6 million in this period, indicating that only 3.42% of the potential savings were achieved. The analyses demonstrated a large level of variation in the uptake of insulin glargine biosimilars across CCGs, with market shares ranging from 0 to 53.3% (December 2018). CONCLUSIONS: These results may encourage decision makers in England to promote the use of best-value treatments in primary care and to reevaluate variation across CCGs.


Asunto(s)
Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/economía , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Diabetes Mellitus , Insulina Glargina/análogos & derivados , Atención Primaria de Salud , Ahorro de Costo/economía , Ahorro de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Ahorro de Costo/tendencias , Diabetes Mellitus/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus/economía , Diabetes Mellitus/epidemiología , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Inglaterra/epidemiología , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Hipoglucemiantes/economía , Hipoglucemiantes/uso terapéutico , Ciencia de la Implementación , Insulina Glargina/economía , Insulina Glargina/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/economía , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Equivalencia Terapéutica
6.
Pediatrics ; 145(6)2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32366609

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Improvement initiatives promote safe and efficient care for hospitalized children. However, these may be associated with limited cost savings. In this article, we sought to understand the potential financial benefit yielded by improvement initiatives by describing the inpatient allocation of costs for common pediatric diagnoses. METHODS: This study is a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of pediatric patients aged 0 to 21 years from 48 children's hospitals included in the Pediatric Health Information System database from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017. We included hospitalizations for 8 common inpatient pediatric diagnoses (seizure, bronchiolitis, asthma, pneumonia, acute gastroenteritis, upper respiratory tract infection, other gastrointestinal diagnoses, and skin and soft tissue infection) and categorized the distribution of hospitalization costs (room, clinical, laboratory, imaging, pharmacy, supplies, and other). We summarized our findings with mean percentages and percent of total costs and used mixed-effects models to account for disease severity and to describe hospital-level variation. RESULTS: For 195 436 hospitalizations, room costs accounted for 52.5% to 70.3% of total hospitalization costs. We observed wide hospital-level variation in nonroom costs for the same diagnoses (25%-81% for seizure, 12%-51% for bronchiolitis, 19%-63% for asthma, 19%-62% for pneumonia, 21%-78% for acute gastroenteritis, 21%-63% for upper respiratory tract infection, 28%-69% for other gastrointestinal diagnoses, and 21%-71% for skin and soft tissue infection). However, to achieve a cost reduction equal to 10% of room costs, large, often unattainable reductions (>100%) in nonroom cost categories are needed. CONCLUSIONS: Inconsistencies in nonroom costs for similar diagnoses suggest hospital-level treatment variation and improvement opportunities. However, individual improvement initiatives may not result in significant cost savings without specifically addressing room costs.


Asunto(s)
Ahorro de Costo/economía , Precios de Hospital , Hospitalización/economía , Hospitales Pediátricos/economía , Habitaciones de Pacientes/economía , Control de Calidad , Adolescente , Niño , Niño Hospitalizado , Preescolar , Estudios de Cohortes , Ahorro de Costo/tendencias , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Precios de Hospital/tendencias , Hospitalización/tendencias , Hospitales Pediátricos/tendencias , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Habitaciones de Pacientes/tendencias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto Joven
7.
Eur J Hosp Pharm ; 27(2): 100-102, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32133136

RESUMEN

Objective: Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a rare and progressive respiratory disease characterised by high blood pressure and vascular resistance producing right ventricular fatigue. In Italy, pulmonary hypertension can be treated with different drugs available on the market at different costs, and in the Marche region distributed exclusively by hospital pharmacies. The present study examined in an area of the Marche region the use of drugs specifically indicated for pulmonary hypertension, and evaluated how the introduction of the generic bosentan might lower pharmaceutical costs for the healthcare budget. Methods: The study examined oral administration prescriptions and costs using data from the Apotheke Gold (Record Data) database from 1 January 2012 to 31 August 2017. Results: Annually (from 1 January 2012 to 31 August 2017), an average of 4.83 patients were treated (prevalence of 102.35 cases per 1 million residents) with ambrisentan (Volibris), bosentan (Tracleer), macitentan (Opsumit), tadalafil (Adcirca) or sildenafil (Revatio). The total expenditure during the 5-year 8-month period was €472 405. Ambrisentan was by far the most expensive product overall, with a total expenditure of €222 380 for the period studied (a daily cost of €67.39), even though Tracleer had the highest cost for a day of treatment (a daily cost of €94.48, but a total expenditure of €163 976 for the period, due to its more recent marketing). Providing patients with the generic form bosentan in place of Tracleer would lower the costs dramatically. A very significant annual savings per patient of approximately €31 879 would be achieved, a striking 92.4% reduction in costs. Conclusion: The prevalence of pulmonary arterial hypertension reported for Camerino and its surrounding area in the Marches region is quite high compared with that reported by other authors for France and Scotland. The introduction of the generic bosentan would cut costs drastically. It is to be hoped that centralised procurement at the regional level would bring further savings.


Asunto(s)
Antihipertensivos/economía , Bosentán/economía , Ahorro de Costo/economía , Costos de los Medicamentos , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/economía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antihipertensivos/uso terapéutico , Bosentán/uso terapéutico , Ahorro de Costo/tendencias , Costos de los Medicamentos/tendencias , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Humanos , Italia/epidemiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/tendencias , Prevalencia , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertensión Arterial Pulmonar/epidemiología
8.
Gac. sanit. (Barc., Ed. impr.) ; 33(3): 229-234, mayo-jun. 2019. tab, graf
Artículo en Inglés | IBECS | ID: ibc-183741

RESUMEN

Objective: To determine if the onset of the economic crisis in Spain affected cancer mortality and mortality trends. Method: We conducted a longitudinal ecological study based on all cancer-related deaths and on specific types of cancer (lung, colon, breast and prostate) in Spain between 2000 and 2013. We computed age-standardised mortality rates in men and women, and fit mixed Poisson models to analyse the effect of the crisis on cancer mortality and trends therein. Results: After the onset of the economic crisis, cancer mortality continued to decline, but with a significant slowing of the yearly rate of decline (men: RR = 0.987, 95%CI = 0.985-0.990, before the crisis, and RR = 0.993, 95%CI = 0.991-0.996, afterwards; women: RR = 0.990, 95%CI = 0.988-0.993, before, and RR = 1.002, 95%CI = 0.998-1.006, afterwards). In men, lung cancer mortality was reduced, continuing the trend observed in the pre-crisis period; the trend in colon cancer mortality did not change significantly and continued to increase; and the yearly decline in prostate cancer mortality slowed significantly. In women, lung cancer mortality continued to increase each year, as before the crisis; colon cancer continued to decease; and the previous yearly downward trend in breast cancer mortality slowed down following the onset of the crisis. Conclusions: Since the onset of the economic crisis in Spain the rate of decline in cancer mortality has slowed significantly, and this situation could be exacerbated by the current austerity measures in healthcare


Objetivo: Determinar si el inicio de la crisis económica en España afectó a la mortalidad por cáncer y sus tendencias. Método: Estudio ecológico longitudinal que analiza todas las muertes por cáncer y por tipos específicos de cáncer (pulmón, colon, mama y próstata) en España entre 2000 y 2013. Se estimaron las tasas de mortalidad estandarizadas por edad en hombres y mujeres, y se ajustaron modelos mixtos de Poisson para analizar el efecto de la crisis sobre la mortalidad por cáncer y sus tendencias. Resultados: Después del inicio de la crisis económica, la mortalidad por cáncer continuó su tendencia a la baja, pero con una disminución significativa del decrecimiento anual (hombres: riesgo relativo [RR] = 0,987, intervalo de confianza del 95% [IC95%] = 0,985-0,990, antes de la crisis, y RR = 0,993, IC95% = 0,991-0,996 después; mujeres: RR = 0,990, IC95% = 0,988-0,993, antes, y RR = 1,002, IC95% = 0,998-1,006 después). En los hombres, la mortalidad por cáncer de pulmón se redujo, continuando la tendencia observada en el periodo anterior a la crisis; la tendencia en la mortalidad por cáncer de colon no cambió significativamente y siguió aumentando; y la disminución anual de la mortalidad por cáncer de próstata se desaceleró significativamente. En las mujeres, la mortalidad por cáncer de pulmón continuó aumentando cada año, como antes de la crisis; el cáncer de colon continuó disminuyendo; y la tendencia a la disminución de la mortalidad por cáncer de mama se desaceleró después del inicio de la crisis. Conclusiones: Desde el inicio de la crisis económica en España, la disminución de la tasa de mortalidad por cáncer se ha desacelerado significativamente y esta situación podría verse exacerbada por las actuales medidas de austeridad en el sistema sanitario


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Asignación de Recursos/tendencias , Financiación de la Atención de la Salud , Recesión Económica/estadística & datos numéricos , Ahorro de Costo/tendencias , Mortalidad/tendencias , Estudios Longitudinales
11.
Pharmacotherapy ; 38(12): 1241-1249, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30403299

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: A new postcardiac surgery fluid resuscitation strategy was implemented in our cardiovascular intensive care unit (CVICU) to implement evidence-based practice. We transitioned from a primarily albumin fluid-based strategy to a lactated Ringer's fluid-based strategy. We sought to determine whether a new postoperative fluid resuscitation strategy significantly altered the fluid composition for postcardiac surgery patients and what effect that would have on fluid resuscitation costs. Secondary outcomes included various clinical parameters. METHODS: This was a retrospective, before-and-after cohort study of postcardiac surgery patients in an academic quaternary care intensive care unit (ICU) during two different 3-month time intervals. A total of 192 patients were studied: 108 pre-intervention and 84 post intervention. The intervention consisted of surveying stakeholders regarding potential concerns of reducing albumin use, an educational intervention addressing those concerns, and removing albumin from the routine postcardiac surgery ICU admission order set. RESULTS: In the post intervention time period, albumin use decreased significantly compared to pre-invention (p<0.01), and lactated Ringer's volume increased significantly (p<0.01). However, total volume administered for resuscitation was not significantly different pre- and post intervention (1129 ml vs. 1369 ml, p=0.136). There were a net-cost savings between the pre-intervention and post intervention period (3 mo) of $30,549.20, with the albumin reduction accounting for most of those savings. Secondary outcomes were not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSIONS: An albumin fluid reduction strategy was successful in reducing the amount of albumin fluid used for postcardiac surgery patients and resulted in substantial cost savings.


Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/tendencias , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/tendencias , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Lactato de Ringer/administración & dosificación , Albúmina Sérica Humana/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Ahorro de Costo/métodos , Ahorro de Costo/tendencias , Femenino , Fluidoterapia/economía , Fluidoterapia/métodos , Fluidoterapia/tendencias , Humanos , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidados Posoperatorios/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Lactato de Ringer/economía , Albúmina Sérica Humana/economía
12.
J Gen Intern Med ; 33(12): 2106-2112, 2018 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30291604

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Programs to improve quality of care and lower costs for the highest utilizers of health services are proliferating, yet such programs have difficulty demonstrating cost savings. OBJECTIVE: In this study, we explore the degree to which changes in Patient Activation Measure (PAM) levels predict health care costs among high-risk patients. PARTICIPANTS: De-identified claims, demographic data, and serial PAM scores were analyzed on 2155 patients from multiple medical groups engaged in an existing Center for Medicare and Medicaid Innovation-funded intervention over 3 years designed to activate and improve care coordination for high-risk patients. DESIGN: In this prospective cohort study, four levels of PAM (from low to high) were used as the main predictor variable. We fit mixed linear models for log10 of allowed charges in follow-up periods in relation to change in PAM, controlling for baseline PAM, baseline costs, age, sex, income, and baseline risk score. MAIN MEASURES: Total allowed charges were derived from claims data for the cohort. PAM scores were from a separate database managed by the local practices. KEY RESULTS: A single PAM level increase was associated with 8.3% lower follow-up costs (95% confidence interval 2.5-13.2%). CONCLUSIONS: These findings contribute to a growing evidence base that the change in PAM score could serve as an early signal indicating the impact of interventions designed for high-cost, high-needs patients.


Asunto(s)
Ahorro de Costo/economía , Ahorro de Costo/tendencias , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Participación del Paciente/economía , Participación del Paciente/tendencias , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Medicaid/economía , Medicaid/tendencias , Medicare/economía , Medicare/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
15.
Int J Clin Pharm ; 40(2): 474-479, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29468527

RESUMEN

Background Given the complexity of solid organ transplant recipients, a multidisciplinary approach is required. To promote medication safety and enable providers to focus on the medical and surgical needs of these patients, our department of pharmacy created a collaborative practice agreement between physicians and pharmacists. Through this agreement, credentialed pharmacists are empowered to provide inpatient services including initiation and adjustment of medications through independent review of laboratory results after multidisciplinary rounds. Objective To evaluate the effect of our collaborative practice agreement on clinical care and institutional finances. Setting An inpatient setting at a large academic medical center. Methods Three transplant pharmacists entered all clinical interventions made on abdominal transplant recipients between September and October 2013 into Quantifi®, a software application that categorizes and assigns a cost savings value based on impact and type of intervention. Main outcome measure The main outcome measures in this study were number and categorization of interventions, as well as estimated cost savings to the institution. Results There were 1060 interventions recorded, an average of 20 interventions per pharmacist per day. The most common interventions were pharmacokinetic evaluations (36%) and dose adjustments (19%). Over the time period, these interventions translated into an estimated savings of $107,634.00, or an annual cost savings of $373,131.20 per pharmacist, or a cost-benefit ratio of 2.65 to the institution. Conclusions Based on our study, implementation of a collaborative practice agreement enables credentialed pharmacists to make clinically and financially meaningful interventions in a complex patient population.


Asunto(s)
Costos de Hospital/tendencias , Colaboración Intersectorial , Trasplante de Órganos/tendencias , Farmacéuticos/tendencias , Médicos/tendencias , Rol Profesional , Ahorro de Costo/economía , Ahorro de Costo/tendencias , Humanos , Trasplante de Órganos/economía , Farmacéuticos/economía , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/economía , Servicio de Farmacia en Hospital/tendencias , Médicos/economía , Estudios Prospectivos
16.
BMC Geriatr ; 18(1): 57, 2018 02 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29471784

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Given the high costs associated with the care of those with Alzheimer's disease (AD) dementia, we examined the likely impact of a reduction in the rate of cognitive decline upon cost outcomes associated with this disease. METHODS: Using the group of patients with mild AD dementia from the GERAS study, generalised linear modelling (GLM) was used to explore the relationship between change in cognition as measured using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and UK overall costs (health care and social care costs, and total societal costs) associated with AD dementia. RESULTS: A total of 200 patients with mild AD dementia were identified. Least squares mean (LSM) ± standard error (SE) reduction in MMSE score was 3.6 ± 0.4 points over 18 months. Using GLM it was possible to calculate that this worsening in cognition was associated with an 8.7% increase in total societal costs, equating to an increase of approximately £2200 per patient over an 18-month period. If the rate of decline in cognition was reduced by 30% or 50%, the associated savings in total societal costs over 18 months would be approximately £670 and £1100, respectively, of which only £110 and £180, respectively, could be attributed to a saving of health care costs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that there are potential savings to be made in the care of patients with AD dementia through reducing the rate of cognitive decline. A reduction in wider societal costs is likely to be the main contributor to these potential savings, and need to be further evaluated when intervention costs and cost offsets can be measured.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad de Alzheimer/economía , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/epidemiología , Disfunción Cognitiva/economía , Disfunción Cognitiva/epidemiología , Ahorro de Costo/economía , Modelos Económicos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Enfermedad de Alzheimer/prevención & control , Disfunción Cognitiva/prevención & control , Ahorro de Costo/tendencias , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Reino Unido/epidemiología
17.
Tob Control ; 27(e2): e167-e170, 2018 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29146589

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: The health gains and cost savings from tobacco tax increase peak many decades into the future. Policy-makers may take a shorter-term perspective and be particularly interested in the health of working-age adults (given their role in economic productivity). Therefore, we estimated the impact of tobacco taxes in this population within a 10-year horizon. METHODS: As per previous modelling work, we used a multistate life table model with 16 tobacco-related diseases in parallel, parameterised with rich national data by sex, age and ethnicity. The intervention modelled was 10% annual increases in tobacco tax from 2011 to 2020 in the New Zealand population (n=4.4 million in 2011). The perspective was that of the health system, and the discount rate used was 3%. RESULTS: For this 10-year time horizon, the total health gain from the tobacco tax in discounted quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) in the 20-65 year age group (age at QALY accrual) was 180 QALYs or 1.6% of the lifetime QALYs gained in this age group (11 300 QALYs). Nevertheless, for this short time horizon: (1) cost savings in this group amounted to NZ$10.6 million (equivalent to US$7.1 million; 95% uncertainty interval: NZ$6.0 million to NZ$17.7 million); and (2) around two-thirds of the QALY gains for all ages occurred in the 20-65 year age group. Focusing on just the preretirement and postretirement ages, the QALY gains in each of the 60-64 and 65-69 year olds were 11.5% and 10.6%, respectively, of the 268 total QALYs gained for all age groups in 2011-2020. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of the health benefit over a 10-year horizon from increasing tobacco taxes is accrued in the working-age population (20-65 years). There remains a need for more work on the associated productivity benefits of such health gains.


Asunto(s)
Ahorro de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Ahorro de Costo/tendencias , Estado de Salud , Nicotiana , Impuestos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Estadísticos , Nueva Zelanda , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Adulto Joven
18.
Ann Surg ; 268(1): 22-27, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29206678

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To determine the temporal relationship between reducing surgical complications and costs, using the study population of bariatric surgery. BACKGROUND: Understanding the relationship between quality and costs has significant implications for the business case of investing in performance improvement. An unprecedented focus on safety in bariatric surgery has led to substantial reductions in complication rates over time, making it an ideal patient population in which to examine this relationship. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of Medicare beneficiaries undergoing bariatric surgery in the years 2005 to 2006 and 2013 to 2014 (total N = 37,329 patients, 562 hospitals). Hospitals were ranked into quintiles based on their degree of improvement in risk and reliability-adjusted 30-day rates of serious complications across the time periods. Multivariable regression was used to calculate corresponding changes in average price-standardized payments for each quintile of hospitals. RESULTS: We found a strong association between reductions in complications and decreased Medicare payments. The top 20% of hospitals had a decrease in average serious complication rate of 7.3% (10.0%-2.7%; P < 0.001) and an average per-patient savings of $4861 (95% confidence interval $3921-5802). Conversely, the bottom 20% of hospitals had smaller decrease in complication rate of 0.8% (4.4% to 3.6%; P < 0.001) and a smaller average savings of $2814 (95% confidence interval $2139-3490). CONCLUSIONS: When analyzing Medicare patients undergoing bariatric surgery, hospitals with the largest reductions in serious postoperative complications had the greatest decrease in per-patient payments. This study demonstrates the potential savings associated with quality improvement in high-risk surgical procedures.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Bariátrica/economía , Ahorro de Costo/tendencias , Medicare/economía , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/economía , Adulto , Cirugía Bariátrica/normas , Cirugía Bariátrica/tendencias , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Medicare/tendencias , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Obesidad Mórbida/economía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Ajuste de Riesgo , Estados Unidos
19.
Clin Drug Investig ; 38(4): 353-363, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29270790

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: More than 30% of patients with epilepsy have inadequate control of seizures with drug therapy. The goal of this study is to determine the budget impact (BI) of the introduction of brivaracetam to the portfolio of approved drugs in Spain as adjunctive therapy for the treatment of partial-onset epilepsy in patients over 16 years old with a 5-year time horizon in the Valencia Community, a Spanish region with a population of 5 million. METHODS: The BI model compares the pharmaceutical expenditure on antiepileptics in two scenarios: with and without brivaracetam. It assumes that the introduction and increased use of brivaracetam will lead to a proportional decrease in consumption of coexisting adjunctive antiepileptics and calculates the evolution of the consumption of brivaracetam over 5 years (2016-2020). The model was designed from the perspective of the Spanish National Health System. Data on the candidate population, consumption of antiepileptics, market share and pharmaceutical expenditure were obtained from real-world data. Finally, a sensitivity analysis was carried out on the set of variables involved in the evolution of costs using a Monte-Carlo simulation. RESULTS: The model estimates that the target population eligible for adjunctive antiepileptics will hold at around 2352 between 2016 and 2020. Annual expenditure on antiepileptics is approximately €3.6 million. The number of patients eligible for treatment with brivaracetam would increase from 42 to 179 and annual savings of 0.09-0.37% would be created, representing €41,873 over 5 years (0.23% of the total budget). The sensitivity analysis corroborates that the probability of achieving savings with brivaracetam is around 84%. CONCLUSIONS: Brivaracetam is a therapeutic alternative that allows savings for the health system in patients with non-controlled epilepsy in monotherapy, having a fixed, predictable annual cost (independent of dose) from the first day of treatment as the lack of need for titration means the patient is within a range of therapeutic doses from the first dose.


Asunto(s)
Ahorro de Costo/estadística & datos numéricos , Epilepsias Parciales/tratamiento farmacológico , Epilepsias Parciales/economía , Pirrolidinonas/economía , Pirrolidinonas/uso terapéutico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anticonvulsivantes/uso terapéutico , Ahorro de Costo/tendencias , Costos de los Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioterapia Combinada/economía , Femenino , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos Económicos , Método de Montecarlo , España , Adulto Joven
20.
Neurosurgery ; 83(4): 761-767, 2018 10 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29267955

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Surgical-site infections (SSIs) are an important cause of morbidity and mortality in neurosurgical patients. Topical antibiotics are one potential method to reduce the incidence of these infections. OBJECTIVE: To examine the efficacy of topical vancomycin applied within the wound during craniotomy in a large prospective cohort study at a major academic center. METHODS: Three hundred fifty-five patients were studied prospectively in this cohort study; 205 patients received 1 g of topical vancomycin powder in the subgaleal space while 150 matched control patients did not. Patients otherwise received identical care. The primary outcome variable was SSI rate factored by cohort. Secondary analysis examined cost savings from vancomycin usage estimated from hospital costs associated with SSI in craniotomy patients. RESULTS: The addition of topical vancomycin was associated with a significantly lower rate of SSI than standard of care alone (0.49% [1/205] vs 6% [9/150], P = .002). Based on the costs of revision surgery for infections, topical vancomycin usage was estimated to save $1367 446 per 1000 craniotomy patients. No adverse reactions occurred. CONCLUSION: Topical vancomycin is a safe, effective, and cost-saving measure to prevent SSIs following craniotomy. These results have broad implications for standard of care in craniotomy.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/administración & dosificación , Craneotomía/tendencias , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/tendencias , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Vancomicina/administración & dosificación , Administración Tópica , Adulto , Anciano , Antibacterianos/economía , Estudios de Cohortes , Ahorro de Costo/tendencias , Craneotomía/efectos adversos , Craneotomía/economía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Polvos , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/efectos adversos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/economía , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Vancomicina/economía
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA