Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 92
1.
J Correct Health Care ; 28(1): 54-58, 2022 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34788552

Crisis stabilization units (CSUs) are one type of "alternative to arrest" program used for jail diversion. We aimed to estimate the economic costs of starting and operating a CSU in Arkansas. We estimated the economic costs of the Pulaski County Regional CSU (PCRCSU) located in Little Rock, Arkansas, from September 1, 2018, to August 31, 2019. We collected data through interviews about start-up and ongoing management costs. We calculated total annual economic cost, average admission cost, and average 24 hr admission cost. There were 536 admissions to the CSU during the study period. The average length of stay was 60.27 hr. The total annual cost of the PCRCSU was $1,636,831 and average per admission cost was $3,054. Our results provide valuable economic data to government stakeholders who are considering establishing a CSU.


Criminal Law , Crisis Intervention , Arkansas , Costs and Cost Analysis , Criminal Law/economics , Criminal Law/organization & administration , Humans , Mental Disorders/economics , Mental Disorders/therapy , Mental Health Services/economics , Mental Health Services/organization & administration
2.
Psychol Trauma ; 12(7): 730-738, 2020 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32212775

OBJECTIVE: Dissociative disorders (DDs) are associated with intensive, long-term treatment, suicidality, recurrent hospitalizations, and high rates of disability. However, little is known about the specifics of the economic burden associated with DDs. This worldwide, systematic review examines the results of studies in adults on direct and indirect costs associated with DDs. METHOD: We searched 6 databases and the reference lists of articles. We also approached researchers to identify unpublished studies. No language restrictions were imposed. RESULTS: A total of 1,002 records met the search criteria, of which 29 papers were selected for full-text inspection. Ultimately, of these, we reviewed four empirical studies. We provide a narrative discussion of study findings. Our findings suggest that DDs are costly to society, and that there is a reduction in service utilization and associated costs over time with diagnosing of and specialized treatment for DDs. However, the overall quality of the economic evaluations was low; several types of DDs, comorbid conditions, and costs were not included; and men were underrepresented. Due to the heterogeneity among studies, we could not perform a meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: Due to the heterogeneity and low quality of the identified economic evaluations, no firm conclusions about the economic burden of DDs alone can be drawn. Higher quality research, including a detailed description of the study design, population, and primary outcome measures used, utilizing appropriate clinical alternatives and including major comorbidities, is urgently needed to more rigorously assess the economic impact of DDs. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).


Dissociative Disorders/economics , Health Care Costs , Health Services/economics , Social Security/economics , Crime/economics , Criminal Law/economics , Efficiency , Foster Home Care/economics , Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Juvenile Delinquency/economics , Mental Health Services/economics , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data
3.
J Stud Alcohol Drugs ; 81(1): 24-33, 2020 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32048598

OBJECTIVE: There are few cost-effectiveness analyses that model alcohol outlet zoning policies. This study determines the potential decreases in homicides, disability-adjusted life years (DALYs), and victim and criminal justice costs associated with four policy options that would reduce the alcohol outlet access in Baltimore. METHOD: This cost-effectiveness analysis used associations between on-premise (incidence rate ratio [IRR] = 1.41), off-premise (IRR = 1.76), and combined on- and off-premise outlet density (IRR = 1.07) and homicide in Baltimore. We determined the potential change in the level of homicide that could occur with changes in the density of alcohol outlets, assuming that 50% of the association was causal. RESULTS: Reducing alcohol outlet density in Baltimore City by one quintile was associated with decreases of 51 homicides per year, $63.7 million, and 764 DALYs. Removing liquor stores in residential zones was associated with 22 fewer homicides, which would cost $27.5 million and lead to 391 DALYs. Removing bars/taverns operating as liquor stores was associated with a decrease of one homicide, $1.2 million, and 17 DALYs. Removing both the liquor stores in residential zones and the bars/taverns operating as liquor stores was associated with 23 fewer homicides, which translated to $28.7 million and 409 DALYs. CONCLUSIONS: For preventing homicides, the strategy of removing liquor stores in residential zones was preferred because it was associated with substantial reductions in homicides without closing unacceptably high numbers of outlets. It is possible that policies that close the bars/taverns operating as liquor stores would be associated with decreases in other types of violent crime.


Alcoholic Beverages/economics , Commerce/economics , Homicide/statistics & numerical data , Violence/prevention & control , Baltimore , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Crime Victims/economics , Criminal Law/economics , Humans , Public Policy
4.
CNS Spectr ; 25(5): 566-570, 2020 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31910935

The United States' criminal justice system has seen exponential growth in costs related to the incarceration of persons with mental illness. Jails, prisons, and state hospitals' resources are insufficient to adequately treat the sheer number of individuals cycling through their system. Reversing the cycle of criminalization of mental illness is a complicated process, but mental health diversion programs across the nation are uniquely positioned to do just that. Not only are these programs providing humane treatment to individuals within the community and breaking the cycle of recidivism, the potential fiscal savings are over 1 billion dollars.


Community Integration/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Criminal Law/economics , Insanity Defense , Mental Disorders/economics , Humans
5.
Am J Manag Care ; 25(13 Suppl): S250-S255, 2019 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31361427

The opioid crisis has made financial impacts across all levels of the public sector. This report focuses on costs related to the criminal justice system (CJS) in Pennsylvania. Costs impacting 3 principal areas of the CJS are examined: opioid-related arrests, court costs, and incarceration. Analysis of the state-level CJS is our main focus; no local-level costs are included. Through this examination, costs of the opioid crisis for the period of 2007 to 2016 were estimated using opioid costs for 2006 as a baseline. Total costs to the Pennsylvania CJS during this period were over $526 million, with most of that accounted for by state corrections. Opioid-related trends in arrests, court proceedings, and incarceration were not sufficiently well documented to allow for rigorous analysis in earlier periods, and this was the primary limitation to our analysis.


Criminal Law/economics , Opioid Epidemic/statistics & numerical data , Opioid-Related Disorders/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Criminal Law/legislation & jurisprudence , Humans , Law Enforcement , Pennsylvania/epidemiology , Prisons/economics
6.
Am J Manag Care ; 25(13 Suppl): S270-S276, 2019 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31361430

As the opioid epidemic has drawn increased attention, many researchers are attempting to estimate the financial burden of opioid misuse. These estimates have become particularly relevant as state and local governments have begun to take legal action against pharmaceutical manufacturers, distributors, and others who are identified as being potentially responsible for the worsening epidemic. An important category of costs includes those related to the effect of opioid misuse on labor market outcomes and productivity. Most published estimates of opioid-attributable productivity losses estimate the financial burden borne by society, failing to distinguish between costs internalized by individuals and those that spill over to third parties, such as state and federal governments. This article provides an overview and a conceptual framework for 2 types of labor market-related costs borne by state and federal governments that typically have not been incorporated into existing estimates, which may represent important categories of expenditures. Because detailed estimates of lost tax revenue are available elsewhere, this article focuses largely on whether, and how, to incorporate opioid-related expenses incurred by means-tested government programs into more general estimates of the economic harm created by the opioid epidemic.


Employment/economics , Opioid Epidemic/statistics & numerical data , Opioid-Related Disorders/economics , Absenteeism , Cost of Illness , Criminal Law/economics , Efficiency , Federal Government , Female , Health Expenditures/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Mortality, Premature , Opioid-Related Disorders/mortality , Pregnancy , Public Assistance/economics , Social Work/economics , State Government , Taxes/economics
8.
Law Hum Behav ; 43(3): 205-219, 2019 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31045389

This article presents an expected cost model for evaluating and comparing the performance of eyewitness identification procedures. The model estimates the expected cost of an identification procedure in order to quantify how well the procedure helps the police achieve the investigation goal of identifying and incriminating the culprit. We first apply the expected cost model to analyze five major procedural reforms, including showups versus lineups, filler similarity, administrator influence, lineup instruction, and presentation format. Our analysis reveals that when there is a trade-off between accurate and mistaken identifications, conclusions about procedural superiority depend on the prior probability of guilt and relative costs of different identification outcomes. We then conduct an additional analysis based on a simultaneous consideration of all identification outcomes (i.e., suspect identifications, filler identifications, and rejections). Our analysis shows that assuming different costs for filler identifications and rejections can change conclusions about procedural superiority. We conclude by discussing insights provided by the expected cost model regarding how the legal system can reduce expected costs of eyewitness identification-by changing the conditional probabilities, by reducing the costs of identification outcomes, or by increasing the prior probability of guilt. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).


Costs and Cost Analysis , Criminal Law/economics , Mental Recall , Probability , Criminal Law/methods , Humans , Recognition, Psychology
9.
Am J Prev Med ; 55(4): 433-444, 2018 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30166082

INTRODUCTION: This study estimated the U.S. lifetime per-victim cost and economic burden of intimate partner violence. METHODS: Data from previous studies were combined with 2012 U.S. National Intimate Partner and Sexual Violence Survey data in a mathematical model. Intimate partner violence was defined as contact sexual violence, physical violence, or stalking victimization with related impact (e.g., missed work days). Costs included attributable impaired health, lost productivity, and criminal justice costs from the societal perspective. Mean age at first victimization was assessed as 25 years. Future costs were discounted by 3%. The main outcome measures were the mean per-victim (female and male) and total population (or economic burden) lifetime cost of intimate partner violence. Secondary outcome measures were marginal outcome probabilities among victims (e.g., anxiety disorder) and associated costs. Analysis was conducted in 2017. RESULTS: The estimated intimate partner violence lifetime cost was $103,767 per female victim and $23,414 per male victim, or a population economic burden of nearly $3.6 trillion (2014 US$) over victims' lifetimes, based on 43 million U.S. adults with victimization history. This estimate included $2.1 trillion (59% of total) in medical costs, $1.3 trillion (37%) in lost productivity among victims and perpetrators, $73 billion (2%) in criminal justice activities, and $62 billion (2%) in other costs, including victim property loss or damage. Government sources pay an estimated $1.3 trillion (37%) of the lifetime economic burden. CONCLUSIONS: Preventing intimate partner violence is possible and could avoid substantial costs. These findings can inform the potential benefit of prioritizing prevention, as well as evaluation of implemented prevention strategies.


Cost of Illness , Crime Victims/statistics & numerical data , Criminal Law/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Intimate Partner Violence/economics , Adult , Criminal Law/statistics & numerical data , Efficiency , Female , Humans , Intimate Partner Violence/statistics & numerical data , Male , Middle Aged , Stalking/psychology , Surveys and Questionnaires
10.
J Behav Health Serv Res ; 45(3): 321-339, 2018 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29582233

Juvenile drug court (JDC) programs are an increasingly popular option for rehabilitating juvenile offenders with substance problems, but research has found inconsistent evidence regarding their effectiveness and economic impact. While assessing client outcomes such as reduced substance use and delinquency is necessary to gauge program effectiveness, a more comprehensive understanding of program success and sustainability can be attained by examining program costs and economic benefits. As part of the National Cross-Site Evaluation of JDC and Reclaiming Futures (RF), an economic analysis of five JDC/RF programs was conducted from a multisystem and multiagency perspective. The study highlights the direct and indirect costs of JDC/RF and the savings generated from reduced health problems, illegal activity, and missed school days. Results include the average (per participant) cost of JDC/RF, the total economic benefits per JDC/RF participant, and the net savings of JDC/RF relative to standard JDC.


Criminal Law/economics , Juvenile Delinquency/economics , Legal Services/economics , Substance-Related Disorders/economics , Adolescent , Community Mental Health Services/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis , Health Care Costs , Humans , Program Evaluation , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy , United States , Volunteers
11.
Int J Drug Policy ; 53: 32-36, 2018 03.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29278830

Over the past decade there has been a clear consensus among drug policy researchers that the practice of incarcerating persons for drug offenses has been counterproductive. As a result, U.S. criminal justice policy is increasingly emphasizing alternative dispositions to incarceration for drug related arrests. In addition, large numbers of persons currently incarcerated for drug related offenses are being released into communities. However, there are serious questions about where these individuals are going to live once released and how they will access needed services. Residential recovery homes in the community are good options for those who wish to pursue abstinence from drugs. They provide a drug- and alcohol-free living environment along with social support for abstinence and successful functioning in the community. This paper reviews recent changes in drug policy the U.S. and describes the variety of recovery home options that are available to persons diverted or released from incarceration.


Criminal Law/statistics & numerical data , Residential Facilities/statistics & numerical data , Residential Treatment/statistics & numerical data , Substance-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Criminal Law/economics , Criminal Law/trends , Humans , Prisoners , Prisons/economics , Prisons/statistics & numerical data , Residential Facilities/economics , Residential Treatment/economics , United States
12.
Int J Prison Health ; 13(3-4): 168-172, 2017 09 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28914124

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to discuss how case management can decrease recidivism for people with serious mental illness (SMI) because people with SMI are at high risk for incarceration and recidivism. Design/methodology/approach Examples of successful case management models for formerly incarcerated individuals with SMI found through a secondary analysis of qualitative data and an analysis of the literature are presented. Findings Currently, no international, national, or statewide guidelines exist to ensure that formerly incarcerated individuals with SMI receive case management upon community reentry despite evidence that such services can prevent further criminal justice involvement. Recommendations include establishment of and evaluation of best practices for case management. In addition, the authors recommend additional funding for case management with the goal of greatly increasing the number of individuals with SMI leaving the criminal justice system in their ability to access adequate case management. Originality/value Providing effective case management tailored to the needs of formerly incarcerated people with SMI improves their quality of life and reduces their involvement in the criminal justice system with clear positive outcomes for public safety and public health.


Case Management/organization & administration , Criminal Law/organization & administration , Mental Disorders/therapy , Recidivism/prevention & control , Case Management/economics , Criminal Law/economics , Humans , Quality of Life , Severity of Illness Index
13.
Pharmacoeconomics ; 35(9): 895-908, 2017 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28597368

BACKGROUND: Intersectoral costs and benefits (ICBs), i.e. costs and benefits of healthcare interventions outside the healthcare sector, can be a crucial component in economic evaluations from the societal perspective. Pivotal to their estimation is the existence of sound resource-use measurement (RUM) instruments; however, RUM instruments for ICBs in the education or criminal justice sectors have not yet been systematically collated or their psychometric quality assessed. This review aims to fill this gap. METHODS: To identify relevant instruments, the Database of Instruments for Resource Use Measurement (DIRUM) was searched. Additionally, a systematic literature review was conducted in seven electronic databases to detect instruments containing ICB items used in economic evaluations. Finally, studies evaluating the psychometric quality of these instruments were searched. RESULTS: Twenty-six unique instruments were included. Most frequently, ICB items measured school absenteeism, tutoring, classroom assistance or contacts with legal representatives, police custody/prison detainment and court appearances, with the highest number of items listed in the Client Service Receipt Inventory/Client Sociodemographic and Service Receipt Inventory/Client Service Receipt Inventory-Children's Version (CSRI/CSSRI/CSRI-C), Studying the Scope of Parental Expenditures (SCOPE) and Self-Harm Intervention, Family Therapy (SHIFT) instruments. ICBs in the education sector were especially relevant for age-related developmental disorders and chronic diseases, while criminal justice resource use seems more important in mental health, including alcohol-related disorders or substance abuse. Evidence on the validity or reliability of ICB items was published for two instruments only. CONCLUSION: With a heterogeneous variety of ICBs found to be relevant for several disease areas but many ICB instruments applied in one study only (21/26 instruments), setting-up an international task force to, for example, develop an internationally adaptable instrument is recommended.


Cost-Benefit Analysis , Delivery of Health Care/economics , Health Resources/economics , Criminal Law/economics , Databases, Factual , Education/economics , Humans , Psychometrics , Reproducibility of Results
14.
Addiction ; 112(5): 838-851, 2017 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27981691

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Treatment for opioid use disorders (OUD) reduces the risk of mortality and infectious disease transmission; however, opportunities to quantify the potential economic benefits of associated decreases in drug-related crime are scarce. This paper aimed to estimate the costs of crime during and after periods of engagement in publicly funded treatment for OUD to compare total costs of crime during a hypothetical 6-month period following initiation of opioid agonist treatment (OAT) versus detoxification. DESIGN: Retrospective, administrative data-based cohort study with comprehensive information on drug treatment and criminal justice systems interactions. SETTING: Publicly funded drug treatment facilities in California, USA (2006-10). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 31 659 individuals admitted for the first time to treatment for OUD, and who were linked with criminal justice and mortality data, were followed during a median 2.3 years. Median age at first treatment admission was 32, 35.8% were women and 37.1% primarily used prescription opioids. MEASUREMENTS: Daily costs of crime (US$2014) were calculated from a societal perspective and were composed of the costs of policing, court, corrections and criminal victimization. We estimated the average marginal effect of treatment engagement in OAT or detoxification adjusting for potential fixed and time-varying confounders, including drug use and criminal justice system involvement prior to treatment initiation. FINDINGS: Daily costs of crime during treatment compared with after treatment were $126 lower for OAT [95% confidence interval (CI) = $116, $136] and $144 lower for detoxification (95% CI = $135, $154). Summing the costs of crime during and after treatment over a hypothetical 6-month period using the observed median durations of OAT (161 days) and detoxification (19 days), we estimated that enrolling an individual in OAT as opposed to detoxification would save $17 550 ($16 840, $18 383). CONCLUSIONS: In publicly funded drug treatment facilities in California, USA, engagement in treatment for opioid use disorders is associated with lower costs of crime in the 6 months following initiation of treatment, and the economic benefits were far greater for individuals receiving time-unlimited treatment.


Crime/economics , Financing, Government , Opiate Substitution Treatment , Opioid-Related Disorders/rehabilitation , Adolescent , Adult , California , Cohort Studies , Crime Victims/economics , Criminal Law/economics , Female , Humans , Law Enforcement , Male , Middle Aged , Opioid-Related Disorders/economics , Prisons/economics , Retrospective Studies , Substance Abuse Treatment Centers/economics , Young Adult
15.
Med Care ; 54(10): 901-6, 2016 10.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27623005

IMPORTANCE: It is important to understand the magnitude and distribution of the economic burden of prescription opioid overdose, abuse, and dependence to inform clinical practice, research, and other decision makers. Decision makers choosing approaches to address this epidemic need cost information to evaluate the cost effectiveness of their choices. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the economic burden of prescription opioid overdose, abuse, and dependence from a societal perspective. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Incidence of fatal prescription opioid overdose from the National Vital Statistics System, prevalence of abuse and dependence from the National Survey of Drug Use and Health. Fatal data are for the US population, nonfatal data are a nationally representative sample of the US civilian noninstitutionalized population ages 12 and older. Cost data are from various sources including health care claims data from the Truven Health MarketScan Research Databases, and cost of fatal cases from the WISQARS (Web-based Injury Statistics Query and Reporting System) cost module. Criminal justice costs were derived from the Justice Expenditure and Employment Extracts published by the Department of Justice. Estimates of lost productivity were based on a previously published study. EXPOSURE: Calendar year 2013. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Monetized burden of fatal overdose and abuse and dependence of prescription opioids. RESULTS: The total economic burden is estimated to be $78.5 billion. Over one third of this amount is due to increased health care and substance abuse treatment costs ($28.9 billion). Approximately one quarter of the cost is borne by the public sector in health care, substance abuse treatment, and criminal justice costs. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: These estimates can assist decision makers in understanding the magnitude of adverse health outcomes associated with prescription opioid use such as overdose, abuse, and dependence.


Cost of Illness , Opioid-Related Disorders/economics , Prescription Drug Misuse/economics , Prescription Drug Overuse/economics , Absenteeism , Criminal Law/economics , Criminal Law/statistics & numerical data , Female , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Male , Opioid-Related Disorders/epidemiology , Opioid-Related Disorders/mortality , Prescription Drug Misuse/mortality , Prescription Drug Misuse/statistics & numerical data , Prescription Drug Overuse/statistics & numerical data , United States/epidemiology
16.
Health Aff (Millwood) ; 35(6): 1076-83, 2016 06 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27269025

People with mental illness make up a disproportionate share of the criminal justice-involved population. The passage of critical new reforms affecting health care for vulnerable populations under the Affordable Care Act and the Paul Wellstone and Pete Domenici Mental Health Parity and Addiction Equity Act of 2008 presents unique opportunities to transform systems of care and avert criminal justice involvement. In addition, state and local jurisdictions have implemented a number of strategies to divert people with mental illness from the criminal justice system and reduce recidivism. In this article we summarize current knowledge about the involvement of people with mental illness in the criminal justice system and consider the recent opportunities presented by national and local policies that aim to lower the proportion of such people who are incarcerated.


Criminal Law/statistics & numerical data , Health Services Accessibility , Mental Disorders/economics , Mental Health Services/economics , Criminal Law/economics , Humans , Mental Disorders/epidemiology , Mental Health Services/statistics & numerical data , Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act/legislation & jurisprudence , United States
17.
Int J Law Psychiatry ; 47: 102-8, 2016.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27236433

BACKGROUND: Mental illness has been widely cited as a driver of costs in the criminal justice system. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this paper is to estimate the additional mental health service costs incurred within the criminal justice system that are incurred because of people with mental illnesses who go through the system. Our focus is on costs in Alberta. METHODS: We set up a model of the flow of all persons through the criminal justice system, including police, court, and corrections components, and for mental health diversion, review, and forensic services. We estimate the transitional probabilities and costs that accrue as persons who have been charged move through the system. Costs are estimated for the Alberta criminal justice system as a whole, and for the mental illness component. RESULTS: Public expenditures for each person diverted or charged in Alberta in the criminal justice system, including mental health costs, were $16,138. The 95% range of this estimate was from $14,530 to $19,580. Of these costs, 87% were for criminal justice services and 13% were for mental illness-related services. Hospitalization for people with mental illness who were reviewed represented the greatest additional cost associated with mental illnesses. CONCLUSION: Treatment costs stemming from mental illnesses directly add about 13% onto those in the criminal justice system.


Criminal Law/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Mental Health Services/economics , Alberta , Commitment of Mentally Ill/economics , Costs and Cost Analysis , Humans
18.
Glob Public Health ; 11(1-2): 108-21, 2016.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25996201

This paper explores the possibilities for agency in intimate partner violence (IPV) situations from the perspective of women in Sierra Leone and Liberia using focus group discussions (N groups = 14, N participants = 110) and individual interviews (N = 20). Findings identify multiple interrelated factors influencing the decision-making of women experiencing IPV. At the individual level, emotional factors and women's knowledge of their rights and options influence their decision-making. At the relational level, the role of neighbours, family and friends is crucial, both for emotional support and practical assistance. At the community level, more formal structures play a role, such as chiefs and women's groups, though their effectiveness varies. At the structural level are barriers to effective responses, including a poorly functioning criminal justice system and a social system in which children often stay with fathers following separation or divorce. Strong cultural beliefs operate to keep women in abusive relationships. We identify implications for prevention and response services and make practice recommendations. Since the desire of most women experiencing IPV was to live in peace with their husbands, interventions should respect women's priorities by focusing more on prevention and interventions to end the violence, rather than solely assisting women to leave violent relationships.


Child Welfare/economics , Divorce/economics , Help-Seeking Behavior , Intimate Partner Violence/psychology , Social Class , Social Norms/ethnology , Women's Rights/economics , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Child , Child Welfare/legislation & jurisprudence , Criminal Law/economics , Decision Making , Divorce/legislation & jurisprudence , Family , Female , Focus Groups , Humans , Interviews as Topic , Intimate Partner Violence/economics , Intimate Partner Violence/legislation & jurisprudence , Intimate Partner Violence/prevention & control , Liberia , Middle Aged , Qualitative Research , Sierra Leone , Social Stigma , Social Support , Women's Rights/legislation & jurisprudence , Women's Rights/trends , Young Adult
19.
Psychiatr Serv ; 66(9): 907-9, 2015 Sep.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25975893

The impact of criminal justice involvement and clinical characteristics on the cost of public treatment services for adults with serious mental illnesses is unknown. The authors examined differential effects of justice involvement on behavioral health treatment costs by primary psychiatric diagnosis (schizophrenia or bipolar disorder) and also by substance use diagnosis among 25,133 adult clients of Connecticut's public behavioral health system in fiscal years 2006 and 2007. Justice-involved adults with schizophrenia had the highest costs, strongly driven by forensic hospitalizations. Addressing the cross-system burdens of forensic hospitalizations may be a sensible starting point in the effort to reduce costs in both the public behavioral health and justice systems.


Bipolar Disorder/economics , Bipolar Disorder/therapy , Criminal Law/economics , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Schizophrenia/economics , Schizophrenia/therapy , Substance-Related Disorders/economics , Adult , Connecticut , Criminal Law/statistics & numerical data , Forensic Medicine/economics , Forensic Medicine/statistics & numerical data , Hospitalization/economics , Hospitalization/statistics & numerical data , Humans , Substance-Related Disorders/therapy
...