Clinical features, response to treatment and functional outcome of bipolar disorder patients with and without co-occurring substance use disorder: 1-year follow-up.

INTRODUCTION: Bipolar disorder patients (BP) with comorbid Substance Use Disorder (SUD) may present clinical features that could compromise adherence and response to pharmacological treatment. The purpose of this study was to examine clinical and psychopathological features of BP with and without comorbid SUD in a real-world setting. METHODS: The sample was composed by 131 affective patients. Sixty-five patients were affected by Bipolar Disorder I (BP-I, 49.2%), 29 by Bipolar Disorder II (BP-II, 22.3%) and 37 by Cyclothymic Disorder (CtD, 28.5%), according to DSM-IV. Sixty-six patients were diagnosed for a comorbid SUD. All patients have been submitted to psychometric assessment with Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HARS), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Global Assessment Scale (GAS), Social Adjustment Self-reported Scale (SASS), Quality of Life Scale (QoL), at baseline and repeated follow-up periods (1, 3, 6, 12 months). RESULTS: BP comorbid for SUD were more likely diagnosed as BP-II and CtD and were less likely to present a moderate-severe manic symptomatology. Furthermore, personality disorders were more frequent in SUD patients than in non-comorbid BP. BP with SUD were not different for primary outcome measure (HDRS, HARS, YMRS, GAS) from non-comorbid BP; however, BP with SUD were significantly more impaired in social functioning (SASS) at any stage of the follow-up and poor functioning increased the risk of relapse in substance use during treatment. Finally, SUD comorbidity did not represent a risk factor for treatment drop-out, while in our sample young age, low treatment dosage and BP-I diagnosis were significantly associated with drop-out. DISCUSSION: The primary finding of this work is that BP with comorbid SUD are significantly more compromised in social functioning. Second, these patients were less likely to be diagnosed for BP-I and to present a severe manic symptomatology. Finally, we found that the diagnosis of SUD, but young age, low treatment dosage and BP-I diagnosis to be risk factors for treatment drop-out. Physicians should be alert to these differences in their clinical practice.

Cocaine abuse and the bipolar spectrum in 1090 heroin addicts: clinical observations and a proposed pathophysiologic model.

BACKGROUND: Several studies indicate a specific relationship between bipolar disorder and stimulant use and abuse. It has generally been assumed that cocaine use represents self-enhancement or attempts to optimize one's level of hypomania, cyclothymia or hyperthymia. This topic required further examination among heroin abusers because cocaine abuse is commonly comorbid with heroin abuse. METHODS: Cocaine abuse by bipolar subjects was investigated in a group of 1090 treatment-seeking heroin addicts enrolled between 1994 and 2005. We collected data with 1) the Drug Addiction History Rating Scale; and 2) the Semi-structured Interview for Depression, which inquires systematically among others, about hypomania, cyclothymia, hyperthymia and depressive temperament. Subjects were aged 29+/-6 years, and predominantly male (76.2%). RESULTS: Univariate and multivariate analyses provided correlations in favour of a link between current cocaine abuse and double diagnosis, with special relevance to the bipolar spectrum, as well as psychotic disorders (p<0.0001). LIMITATION: The modality of access to cocaine in different communities and the difficulty to distinguish cocaine use from abuse by the rating scale administered may have limited the interpretation of results. CONCLUSIONS: If cocaine abuse precedes that of heroin or is concomitant, heroin may hypothetically serve as a "mood balancer" which transiently dampens subthreshold excitatory states and mood swings. Our data further suggest the need for a more complex model linking cocaine and bipolarity: subthreshold bipolarity, including hyperthymic and cyclothymic temperaments, seems to predispose to heroin addiction, but craving for the suppressed hypomania in turn could lead to cocaine abuse, which eventually unmasks a frank bipolar disorder - in some cases leading to mixed state, severe mania, as well as psychosis beyond mania. Prospective observations would shed further insight on this complex interface of major clinical and public health importance.

Toward a unitary perspective on the bipolar spectrum and substance abuse: opiate addiction as a paradigm.

Bipolar spectrum disorders and addiction often co-occur and constitute reciprocal risk factors that the authors believe are best considered under a unitary perspective. In particular, we submit that patients whose disorders fall under the bipolar spectrum - and its hyperthymic and cyclothymic temperamental substrates are at increased risk for substance use, possibly moving towards addiction through exposure to intrinsically dependence-producing substances. In our experience, the contribution of bipolar spectrum disorders to the addictive process is often clinically missed, because attenuated and subclinical expressions of such mood disorders as bipolar II and cyclothymia are not adequately appreciated by our current formal diagnostic system (e.g. DSM-IV, as well as research and clinical practice based on it). The use of agonist treatment in dual diagnosis heroin addicts has allowed us to gather valuable knowledge about the intrinsic, and historically and clinically documented mood-regulating effects of opiates. From the therapeutic point of view, the challenge of double diagnosis requires double competence from clinicians. The combination of opiate agonists and mood stabilizers often produces results difficult to obtain with the use of the two types of drugs separately. We therefore submit that the present conceptualization of the link between bipolar spectrum and addictive disorders has not only heuristic and scientific values, but also an important message for the clinician.