Recommendations for Tumor Mutational Burden Assay Validation and Reporting: A Joint Consensus Recommendation of the Association for Molecular Pathology, College of American Pathologists, and Society for Immunotherapy of Cancer.

Tumor mutational burden (TMB) has been recognized as a predictive biomarker for immunotherapy response in several tumor types. Several laboratories offer TMB testing, but there is significant variation in how TMB is calculated, reported, and interpreted among laboratories. TMB standardization efforts are underway, but no published guidance for TMB validation and reporting is currently available. Recognizing the current challenges of clinical TMB testing, the Association for Molecular Pathology convened a multidisciplinary collaborative working group with representation from the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the College of American Pathologists, and the Society for the Immunotherapy of Cancer to review the laboratory practices surrounding TMB and develop recommendations for the analytical validation and reporting of TMB testing based on survey data, literature review, and expert consensus. These recommendations encompass pre-analytical, analytical, and postanalytical factors of TMB analysis, and they emphasize the relevance of comprehensive methodological descriptions to allow comparability between assays.

ERIC recommendations for TP53 mutation analysis in chronic lymphocytic leukemia-2024 update.

In chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), analysis of TP53 aberrations (deletion and/or mutation) is a crucial part of treatment decision-making algorithms. Technological and treatment advances have resulted in the need for an update of the last recommendations for TP53 analysis in CLL, published by ERIC, the European Research Initiative on CLL, in 2018. Based on the current knowledge of the relevance of low-burden TP53-mutated clones, a specific variant allele frequency (VAF) cut-off for reporting TP53 mutations is no longer recommended, but instead, the need for thorough method validation by the reporting laboratory is emphasized. The result of TP53 analyses should always be interpreted within the context of available laboratory and clinical information, treatment indication, and therapeutic options. Methodological aspects of introducing next-generation sequencing (NGS) in routine practice are discussed with a focus on reliable detection of low-burden clones. Furthermore, potential interpretation challenges are presented, and a simplified algorithm for the classification of TP53 variants in CLL is provided, representing a consensus based on previously published guidelines. Finally, the reporting requirements are highlighted, including a template for clinical reports of TP53 aberrations. These recommendations are intended to assist diagnosticians in the correct assessment of TP53 mutation status, but also physicians in the appropriate understanding of the lab reports, thus decreasing the risk of misinterpretation and incorrect management of patients in routine practice whilst also leading to improved stratification of patients with CLL in clinical trials.

Quality-Assured Analysis of PIK3CA Mutations in Hormone Receptor-Positive/Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2-Negative Breast Cancer Tissue.

In precision oncology, reliable testing of predictive molecular biomarkers is a prerequisite for optimal patient treatment. Interlaboratory comparisons are a crucial tool to verify diagnostic performance and reproducibility of one's approach. Herein is described the design and results of the first recurrent, internationally performed PIK3CA (phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3 kinase catalytic subunit α) breast cancer tissue external quality assessment (EQA), organized by German Quality in Pathology GmbH and started in 2021. After the internal pretesting phase performed by the (lead) panel institutes, in both 2021 and 2022, each EQA test set comprised n = 10 tissue samples of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative invasive breast cancer that had to be analyzed and reported by the participants. In 2021, the results were evaluated separately for German-speaking countries (part 1) and international laboratories (part 2). In 2022, the EQA was performed across the European Union. The EQA success rates were 84.6% (n = 11/13), 88.6% (n = 39/44), and 87.9% (n = 29/33) for EQA 2021 part 1, part 2, and EQA 2022, respectively. The most commonly used methods were next-generation sequencing and mutation-/allele-specific qualitative PCR-based assays. In summary, this recurrent PIK3CA EQA proved to be a suitable approach to obtain an international overview of methods used for PIK3CA mutation analysis, to evaluate them qualitatively, and identify the strengths and weaknesses of individual methods.

Analytical Validation of a Telomerase Reverse Transcriptase (TERT) Promoter Mutation Assay.

CONTEXT: Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TERT) promoter-mutated thyroid cancers are associated with a decreased rate of disease-free and disease-specific survival. High-quality analytical validation of a diagnostic test promotes confidence in the results that inform clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to demonstrate the analytical validation of the Afirma TERT promoter mutation assay. METHODS: TERT promoter C228T and C250T variant detection in genomic DNA (gDNA) was analyzed by assessing variable DNA input and the limit of detection (LOD) of variant allele frequency (VAF). The negative and positive percentage agreement (NPA and PPA) of the Afirma TERT test was examined against a reference primer pair as was the analytical specificity from potential interfering substances (RNA and blood gDNA). Further, the intrarun, interrun, and interlaboratory reproducibility of the assay were tested. RESULTS: The Afirma TERT test is tolerant to variation in DNA input amount (7-13 ng) and can detect expected positive TERT promoter variants down to 5% VAF LOD at 7 ng DNA input with greater than 95% sensitivity. Both NPA and PPA were 100% against the reference primer pair. The test remains accurate in the presence of 20% RNA or 80% blood gDNA for an average patient sample that typically has 30% VAF. The test also demonstrated a 100% confirmation rate when compared with an external next-generation sequencing-based reference assay executed in a non-Veracyte laboratory. CONCLUSION: The analytical robustness and reproducibility of the Afirma TERT test support its routine clinical use among thyroid nodules with indeterminate cytology that are Afirma Genomic Sequencing Classifier suspicious or among Bethesda V/VI nodules.

Splicing analyses for variants in MMR genes: best practice recommendations from the European Mismatch Repair Working Group.

Over 20% of the DNA mismatch repair (MMR) germline variants in suspected Lynch syndrome patients are classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). Well-established functional assays are pivotal for assessing the biological impact of these variants and provide relevant evidence for clinical classification. In our collaborative European Mismatch Repair Working Group (EMMR-WG) we compared three different experimental approaches for evaluating the effect of seven variants on mRNA splicing in MMR genes: (i) RT-PCR of full-length transcripts (FLT), (ii) RT-PCR of targeted transcript sections (TTS), both from patient biological samples and (iii) minigene splicing assays. An overall good concordance was observed between splicing patterns in TTS, FLT and minigene analyses for all variants. The FLT analysis depicted a higher number of different isoforms and mitigated PCR-bias towards shorter isoforms. TTS analyses may miss aberrant isoforms and minigene assays may under/overestimate the severity of certain splicing defects. The interpretation of the experimental findings must be cautious to adequately discriminate abnormal events from physiological complex alternative splicing patterns. A consensus strategy for investigating the impact of MMR variants on splicing was defined. First, RNA should be obtained from patient's cell cultures (such as fresh lymphocyte cultures) incubated with/without a nonsense-mediated decay inhibitor. Second, FLT RT-PCR analysis is recommended to oversee all generated isoforms. Third, TTS analysis and minigene assays are useful independent approaches for verifying and clarifying FLT results. The use of several methodologies is likely to increase the strength of the experimental evidence which contributes to improve variant interpretation.

Preparation of multiplexed control materials for cancer mutation analysis by genome editing in GM12878 cells.

BACKGROUND: Quality control materials are necessary for assay development, test validation, and proficiency testing in cancer mutation analysis. Most of the existing controls for somatic mutations only harbor a single variant and are derived from unstable cell lines. This study aimed to establish a method to create stable multianalyte controls in a defined background by genome editing in GM12878 cells, which also can be applied for the reference of next-generation sequencing. METHODS: GM12878 cells were electroporated with a donor plasmid containing a mutant DNA sequence and a Cas9/sgRNA expressing vector. The genome-edited GM12878 cell was validated with Sanger sequencing, amplification refractory mutation system (ARMS), and next-generation sequencing (NGS). RESULTS: We have successfully generated a mutant GM12878 cell line harboring the defined variants including single-nucleotide variants (SNVs), small insertions and deletions (indels), and structural variants (SVs). The introduction of intended mutations in GM12878 cell line was confirmed by both ARMS and sequencing methods. CONCLUSIONS: We developed a method for the preparation of the multiplexed controls for reference mutations in cancer gene by genome editing in GM12878 cells. This methodology can be used to generate other stable cancer reference materials with an unlimited supply.

Revisiting the Implications of Positive Germline Testing Results Using Multi-gene Panels in Breast Cancer Patients.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The use of multi-gene panels for germline testing in breast cancer enables the estimation of cancer risk and guides risk-reducing management options. The aim of this study was to present data that demonstrate the different levels of actionability for multi-gene panels used in genetic testing of breast cancer patients and their family members. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed an analysis in our clinical database to identify breast cancer patients undergoing genetic testing. We reviewed positive results in respect of risk estimation and management, cascade family testing, secondary findings and information for treatment decision-making. RESULTS: A total of 415 positive test reports were identified with 57.1%, 18.1%, 10.8% and 13.5% of individuals having pathogenic/likely pathogenic variants in high, moderate, low and with insufficient evidence for breast cancer risk genes, respectively. Six point seven percent of individuals were double heterozygotes. CONCLUSION: Germline findings in 92% of individuals are linked to evidence-based treatment information and risk estimates for predisposition to breast and/or other cancer types. The use of germline findings for treatment decision making expands the indication of genetic testing to include individuals that could benefit from targeted treatments.

Multiplex technologies for the assessment of minimal residual disease and low-level mutation detection in leukaemia: mass spectrometry versus next-generation sequencing.

With the focus of leukaemia management shifting to the implications of low-level disease burden, increasing attention is being paid on the development of highly sensitive methodologies required for detection. There are various techniques capable of identification of measurable residual disease (MRD) either evidencing as relevant mutation detection [e.g. nucleophosmin 1 (NPM1) mutation] or trace levels of leukaemic clonal populations. The vast majority of these methods only permit detection of a single clone or mutation. However, mass spectrometry and next-generation sequencing enable the interrogation of multiple genes simultaneously, facilitating a more complete genomic profile. In the present review, we explore the methodologies of both techniques in conjunction with the important advantages and limitations associated with each assay. We also highlight the evidence and the various instances where either technique has been used and propose future strategies for MRD detection.

SuperSelective primer pairs for sensitive detection of rare somatic mutations.

SuperSelective primers, by virtue of their unique design, enable the selective exponential amplification of rare DNA fragments containing somatic mutations in the presence of abundant closely related wild-type DNA fragments. However, when a SuperSelective primer is used in conjunction with a conventional reverse primer, linear amplification of the abundant wild-type fragments occurs, and this may lead to a late arising signal that can be confused with the late arising signal from the rare mutant fragments. We have discovered that the use of a pair of SuperSelective primers, one specific for the target mutation in a plus strand, and the other specific for the same mutation in the complementary minus strand, but both possessing 3'-terminal nucleotides that are complementary to the mutation, significantly suppresses the linear amplification of the related wild-type sequence, and prevents the generation of false mutant sequences due to mis-incorporation by the DNA polymerase. As a consequence, the absence of mutant fragments in a sample does not give rise to a false-positive signal, and the presence of mutant fragments in a sample is clearly distinguishable as a true-positive signal. The use of SuperSelective primer pairs should enhance the sensitivity of multiplex PCR assays that identify and quantitate somatic mutations in liquid biopsies obtained from patients with cancer, thereby enabling the choice of a targeted therapy, the determination of its effectiveness over time, and the substitution of a more appropriate therapy as new mutations arise.

Fine-needle Aspiration Washout Precipitation Specimens: An Acceptable Supplement to Genetic Mutation Detection of Thyroid Nodules.

Objectives: Thyroid nodules are common in adults, but only some of them are malignant. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) is widely applied as a reliable and minimally invasive technique for evaluating thyroid nodules. However, the scarcity of FNA biopsy specimens poses a challenge to molecular diagnosis. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of FNA washout precipitation specimens as an effective supplement to the thyroid genetic test. Methods: A total of 115 patients with thyroid nodules were enrolled in our study. The BRAF V600E mutation status was detected in all FNA washout precipitation specimens and biopsy formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) specimens using an amplification refractory mutation system PCR (ARMS-PCR). All patients underwent cytological diagnoses; 79 patients also underwent surgery for histopathological analysis. Results: All the 115 samples were successfully analyzed using both FNA washout precipitation and biopsy FFPE specimens. The results showed that the BRAF V600E status detected in 96 FNA washout precipitation specimens were consistent with that in FNA biopsy FFPE specimens, including 41 BRAF V600E positive and 55 BRAF V600E negative, achieving a concordance rate of 84.4% (kappa = 0.689). Furthermore, the BRAF V600E mutation status using FNA washout precipitation specimens provided a 100.0% positive predictive value for diagnosing papillary thyroid carcinoma in patients with The Bethesda system for reporting thyroid cytopathology (TBSRTC) V. Besides, the BRAF V600E mutation status was positive in 90.9% (10/11) FNA washout precipitation specimens from patients with capsule invasion, achieving a higher overall sensitivity of 100.0%, compared with 57.1% of FNA washout precipitation specimens from patients without capsule invasion. Conclusion: These results suggested that FNA washout precipitation specimens might be a valuable supplementary sample type for detecting the BRAF V600E mutation in patients with thyroid nodules, especially with thyroid capsule invasion.

Clinical Outcomes of Molecular Tumor Boards: A Systematic Review.

We conducted this systematic review to evaluate the clinical outcomes associated with molecular tumor board (MTB) review in patients with cancer. METHODS: A systematic search of PubMed was performed to identify studies reporting clinical outcomes in patients with cancer who were reviewed by an MTB. To be included, studies had to report clinical outcomes, including clinical benefit, response, progression-free survival, or overall survival. Two reviewers independently selected studies and assessed quality with the Quality Assessment Tool for Before-After (Pre-Post) Studies with No Control Group or the Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies depending on the type of study being reviewed. RESULTS: Fourteen studies were included with a total of 3,328 patients with cancer. All studies included patients without standard-of-care treatment options and usually with multiple prior lines of therapy. In studies reporting response rates, patients receiving MTB-recommended therapy had overall response rates ranging from 0% to 67%. In the only trial powered on clinical outcome and including a control group, the group receiving MTB-recommended therapy had significantly improved rate of progression-free survival compared with those receiving conventional therapy. CONCLUSION: Although data quality is limited by a lack of prospective randomized controlled trials, MTBs appear to improve clinical outcomes for patients with cancer. Future research should concentrate on prospective trials and standardization of approach and outcomes.

Establishing community reference samples, data and call sets for benchmarking cancer mutation detection using whole-genome sequencing.

The lack of samples for generating standardized DNA datasets for setting up a sequencing pipeline or benchmarking the performance of different algorithms limits the implementation and uptake of cancer genomics. Here, we describe reference call sets obtained from paired tumor-normal genomic DNA (gDNA) samples derived from a breast cancer cell line-which is highly heterogeneous, with an aneuploid genome, and enriched in somatic alterations-and a matched lymphoblastoid cell line. We partially validated both somatic mutations and germline variants in these call sets via whole-exome sequencing (WES) with different sequencing platforms and targeted sequencing with >2,000-fold coverage, spanning 82% of genomic regions with high confidence. Although the gDNA reference samples are not representative of primary cancer cells from a clinical sample, when setting up a sequencing pipeline, they not only minimize potential biases from technologies, assays and informatics but also provide a unique resource for benchmarking 'tumor-only' or 'matched tumor-normal' analyses.

Low-coverage sequencing cost-effectively detects known and novel variation in underrepresented populations.

Genetic studies in underrepresented populations identify disproportionate numbers of novel associations. However, most genetic studies use genotyping arrays and sequenced reference panels that best capture variation most common in European ancestry populations. To compare data generation strategies best suited for underrepresented populations, we sequenced the whole genomes of 91 individuals to high coverage as part of the Neuropsychiatric Genetics of African Population-Psychosis (NeuroGAP-Psychosis) study with participants from Ethiopia, Kenya, South Africa, and Uganda. We used a downsampling approach to evaluate the quality of two cost-effective data generation strategies, GWAS arrays versus low-coverage sequencing, by calculating the concordance of imputed variants from these technologies with those from deep whole-genome sequencing data. We show that low-coverage sequencing at a depth of ≥4× captures variants of all frequencies more accurately than all commonly used GWAS arrays investigated and at a comparable cost. Lower depths of sequencing (0.5-1×) performed comparably to commonly used low-density GWAS arrays. Low-coverage sequencing is also sensitive to novel variation; 4× sequencing detects 45% of singletons and 95% of common variants identified in high-coverage African whole genomes. Low-coverage sequencing approaches surmount the problems induced by the ascertainment of common genotyping arrays, effectively identify novel variation particularly in underrepresented populations, and present opportunities to enhance variant discovery at a cost similar to traditional approaches.

A simple method to estimate the in-house limit of detection for genetic mutations with low allele frequencies in whole-exome sequencing analysis by next-generation sequencing.

BACKGROUND: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has profoundly changed the approach to genetic/genomic research. Particularly, the clinical utility of NGS in detecting mutations associated with disease risk has contributed to the development of effective therapeutic strategies. Recently, comprehensive analysis of somatic genetic mutations by NGS has also been used as a new approach for controlling the quality of cell substrates for manufacturing biopharmaceuticals. However, the quality evaluation of cell substrates by NGS largely depends on the limit of detection (LOD) for rare somatic mutations. The purpose of this study was to develop a simple method for evaluating the ability of whole-exome sequencing (WES) by NGS to detect mutations with low allele frequency. To estimate the LOD of WES for low-frequency somatic mutations, we repeatedly and independently performed WES of a reference genomic DNA using the same NGS platform and assay design. LOD was defined as the allele frequency with a relative standard deviation (RSD) value of 30% and was estimated by a moving average curve of the relation between RSD and allele frequency. RESULTS: Allele frequencies of 20 mutations in the reference material that had been pre-validated by droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) were obtained from 5, 15, 30, or 40 G base pair (Gbp) sequencing data per run. There was a significant association between the allele frequencies measured by WES and those pre-validated by ddPCR, whose p-value decreased as the sequencing data size increased. By this method, the LOD of allele frequency in WES with the sequencing data of 15 Gbp or more was estimated to be between 5 and 10%. CONCLUSIONS: For properly interpreting the WES data of somatic genetic mutations, it is necessary to have a cutoff threshold of low allele frequencies. The in-house LOD estimated by the simple method shown in this study provides a rationale for setting the cutoff.

Construction of a reference material panel for detecting KRAS/NRAS/EGFR/BRAF/MET mutations in plasma ctDNA.

BACKGROUND: The absence of high-quality next-generation sequencing (NGS) reference material (RM) has impeded the clinical use of liquid biopsies with plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in China. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a national RM panel for external quality assessment and performance evaluation during kit registration of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC)-related Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene (KRAS)/neuroblastoma ras oncogene (NRAS)/epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/B-type Raf kinase (BRAF)/mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor (MET) genetic assays using plasma circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA). METHODS: Mutation cell lines detected by NGS and validated by Sanger sequencing were selected to establish the RM. Cell line genomic DNA was sheared and used to spike basal plasma cfDNA at 10% concentration. Then, the calibration accuracy was determined by four sequencing platforms. Average values were adopted and diluted to 0.1%, 0.3%, 1% and 3% concentrations with basal plasma as the RM panel. Then, five manufacturers were invited to evaluate the performance of the RM panel. RESULTS: 20 cell lines with 23 clinically important mutations were selected, including six mutations in KRAS, two mutations in NRAS, three in BRAF, four in phosphatidylinositol-4,5-bisphosphate 3-kinase catalytic subunit alpha (PIK3CA), six in EGFR, one EGFR Gain (4-5 copy) and one MET Gain (2-5 copy). The RM panel consisted of 87 samples, including these 21 mutations at four concentrations (0.1%, 0.3%, 1% and 3%), one MET gain, one EGFR gain and one wild type. The detection rate was 100% for the 3%, 1% and 0.3% samples at all five companies. For the 0.1% concentration, 15 samples had inconsistent results, but at least three companies had correct results for each mutation. CONCLUSION: RM for a KRAS/NRAS/EGFR/BRAF/MET mutation panel for plasma ctDNA was developed, which will be essential for quality control of the performance of independent laboratories.

DNA damage repair gene mutation testing and genetic counseling in men with/without prostate cancer: a systematic review.

Background: Ongoing clinical trials are investigating PARP inhibitors to target the DNA damage repair (DDR) pathway in prostate cancer. DDR mutation screening will guide treatment strategy and assess eligibility for clinical trials. Materials & methods: This systematic review estimated the rate of DDR mutation testing or genetic counseling among men with or at risk of prostate cancer. Results: From 6856 records, one study fulfilled the inclusion criteria and described men undiagnosed with prostate cancer with a family history of BRCA1/2 mutation who received DDR mutation testing. Conclusion: With only one study included in this first systematic review of DDR mutation testing or genetic counseling in men with or at risk of prostate cancer, more research is warranted.

Rapid EGFR Mutation Detection Using the Idylla Platform: Single-Institution Experience of 1200 Cases Analyzed by an In-House Developed Pipeline and Comparison with Concurrent Next-Generation Sequencing Results.

Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) are the most common targetable alterations in lung adenocarcinoma. To facilitate rapid testing, the Idylla EGFR assay was incorporated as a screening method before next-generation sequencing (NGS). Validation and experience using an in-house developed analysis pipeline, enhanced with a manual review algorithm is described. Results are compared with corresponding NGS results. In all, 1249 samples were studied. Validation demonstrated 98.57% (69/70) concordance with the reference methods. The limit of detection varied from 2% to 5% variant allele frequency for total EGFR quantitation cycle between 20 and 23. Of the 1179 clinical cases, 23.41% were EGFR-positive by Idylla. Concurrent NGS was successfully performed on 94.9% (799/842) requests. Concordance of Idylla with NGS was 98.62% (788/799) and 98.50% (787/799) using our in-house and Idylla analysis pipelines, respectively. Discordances involved missed mutations by both assays associated with low tumor/low input. Incorporating a manual review algorithm to supplement automated calls improved accuracy from 98.62% to 99.37% and sensitivity from 94.68% to 97.58%. Overall reporting time, from receipt of material to official clinical report, ranged from 1 to 3 days. Therefore, Idylla EGFR testing enables rapid and sensitive screening without compromising subsequent comprehensive NGS, when required. Automated calling, enhanced with a manual review algorithm, reduces false-negative calls associated with low tumor/low input samples.

Quality assessment of a clinical next-generation sequencing melanoma panel within the Italian Melanoma Intergroup (IMI).

BACKGROUND: Identification of somatic mutations in key oncogenes in melanoma is important to lead the effective and efficient use of personalized anticancer treatment. Conventional methods focus on few genes per run and, therefore, are unable to screen for multiple genes simultaneously. The use of Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) technologies enables sequencing of multiple cancer-driving genes in a single assay, with reduced costs and DNA quantity needed and increased mutation detection sensitivity. METHODS: We designed a customized IMI somatic gene panel for targeted sequencing of actionable melanoma mutations; this panel was tested on three different NGS platforms using 11 metastatic melanoma tissue samples in blinded manner between two EMQN quality certificated laboratory. RESULTS: The detection limit of our assay was set-up to a Variant Allele Frequency (VAF) of 10% with a coverage of at least 200x. All somatic variants detected by all NGS platforms with a VAF ≥ 10%, were also validated by an independent method. The IMI panel achieved a very good concordance among the three NGS platforms. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that, using the main sequencing platforms currently available in the diagnostic setting, the IMI panel can be adopted among different centers providing comparable results.