Dermatite atopíque : images hístoriques: Historical images of atopic dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis has been described under many names before the XXth century, and first illustrated in the early XIXth century. This article presents historical images from the first volumes of Robert Willan to the Pratique dermatologique, the first encyclopedy published in 1900. Many accurate clinical descriptions of the disease can be found in the early treaties of dermatology, including the one published by Thomas Carrere in 1740. Since then, Alibert and Rayer in France, Hebra and Neumann in Vienna and Duhring and Fox in the USA illustrated their atlases with spectacular images of adults or children suffering from AD, or from other diseases that might have been considered as eczema infantile. Color engravings, color lithographs and black and white photographs showed with an increasing precision the semiology of AD, in the context of artistic representations of high quality, that have not been surpassed by modern photographs. At the beginning of the XXth century the clinical presentation, the course and heredity of the disease were perfectly established, introducing a new era of research in physiopathology and treatment in the following decades.

The history of atopic dermatitis.

Fred Wise (1881-1950) and Marion Sulzberger (1895-1983) are often credited with introducing the term atopic dermatitis to dermatology in 1933. This definition was based on atopy, a term first created by Arthur Coca (1875-1959) and Robert Cooke (1880-1960) in 1923, when they recognized an association between allergic rhinitis and asthma. Despite its recent introduction into our medical lexicon, historical precursors of atopic dermatitis date back to at least as early as 69-140 ce. In this contribution, we highlight both the prominent individuals credited with shaping the disorder into our current interpretation and the suspected historical precursors of this disease and reported treatments.

Historical Perspectives on Atopic Dermatitis: Eczema Through the Ages.

Throughout history, individuals have had a myriad of dermatologic conditions characterized as chronic pruritic dermatoses. The term atopic dermatitis was not coined until the early 20th century. Many diseases typical of this condition were reported using a variety of eponyms and descriptive terms. Even as the incidence of atopic dermatitis rises, it remains poorly understood in the modern era, and viewing the disease from a historical perspective provides useful insight into its nature. This article highlights the evolution of concepts related to the pathogenesis of and recommended treatments for atopic dermatitis.

Atopic dermatitis/atopic eczema.

Atopic dermatitis was described in 1933 but exists since antiquity. We review descriptions of a childhood skin disease compatible with our modern diagnosis of atopic dermatitis, in ancient medicine and in nineteenth century dermatology texts. We identify Hebra's prurigo and Besnier's diathetic prurigo as forerunners of atopic dermatitis, the latter being a synthesis of infantile eczema and prurigo. The pathogenic theories which link atopic dermatitis to humoralistic medicine, to digestive diseases, to allergy may have had consequences on today's reluctance to consider atopic dermatitis as a skin disorder, the treatment of which relies mainly on topicals.

Changing roles of eosinophils in health and disease.

OBJECTIVE: To review and highlight the unappreciated roles of eosinophils suggested by recent studies. DATA SOURCES: The literature, unpublished observations, and insights by the authors. STUDY SELECTIONS: Basic studies of mouse models and patient-based clinical studies of disease. RESULTS: Eosinophils are often thought of as destructive end-stage effector cells primarily linked to parasite host defense and dysregulated immune responses associated with allergic diseases, such as asthma. However, recent studies (ie, research focused on mechanisms of action and translational studies examining disease/inflammatory pathways) are suggesting far more complex roles for eosinophils. The goal of this review is 3-fold. (1) The authors examine the dynamic history of eosinophils and how physicians over time used this information to formulate defining hypotheses. Particular emphasis is placed on recent studies challenging the parochial view of host defense in favor of roles maintaining homeostasis through immune modulation and tissue remodeling/repair. (2) They discuss diagnostic approaches to assess eosinophils in clinical settings as a means of disease identification and subsequently as a measurement of disease severity. (3) They examine how contemporary views of eosinophils and their perceived roles in diseases have led to specific therapeutic strategies. The emphasis is to review the successes and failures of these strategies as the basis of formulating future clinical studies targeting eosinophils as potential therapies of disease. CONCLUSION: Despite the complexities of eosinophil-mediated activities and the less than overwhelming success of initial attempts targeting these cells, eosinophils remain a potentially important focal target of disease diagnosis and subsequent treatment strategies.

Topical therapy of atopic dermatitis: controversies from Hippocrates to topical immunomodulators.

Although atopic dermatitis can be treated efficiently, there is still much controversy about the risk/benefit ratio of both topical corticosteroids and topical immunomodulators. Conflicting data may be found about the usefulness of bathing, diet regulation, and other therapeutic interventions. These controversies result in part from the persistence of Hippocratic doctrines in modern medical thinking. Humoralist and diathetic doctrines, as they pertain to eczema, are reviewed. The paradoxical worsening of oozing and the deadly hazards of hospitalization before the era of antibiotics are brought to mind. We hope that this historical review will improve the understanding of current controversies and help dermatologists to manage patients with atopic dermatitis and other chronic skin diseases.

General Halleck's itchy elbows.

General Henry Wager Halleck served as general-in-chief and chief of staff of the Federal army from 1862-1865. Unpopular with troops as well as with many members of the Lincoln administration, he was a particular source of irritation to Secretary of Navy Gideon Welles. In his posthumously-published diary of the war years, Welles viciously criticized Halleck for his failings as army commander. Welles also derided Halleck's personality and personal appearance. Welles found the general's habitual elbow-scratching annoying enough to mention it in five separate diary entries. This depiction of Halleck ceaselessly, nervously scratching his elbows has entered Civil War folklore. Why did Halleck scratch his elbows? Two possibilities exist. Either he did so compulsively, as a nervous habit, or he was scratching an itch. In this paper, I present a speculative argument that Halleck may have had a skin disease, possibly atopic dermatitis, and that this may have contributed to or have been the sole cause of his elbow scratching.

The first images of atopic dermatitis: an attempt at retrospective diagnosis in dermatology.

BACKGROUND: Atopic dermatitis was defined in 1933. Earlier descriptions have yet not been thoroughly studied. OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to identify the first images of atopic dermatitis among historical illustrations of skin diseases. METHODS: We posted 20 selected images on an Internet site and asked experts in pediatric dermatology to decide whether or not they represented atopic dermatitis. RESULTS: By means of the Delphi technique, a consensus could be reached for 19 of the 20 images. The experts' accuracy was good. LIMITATIONS: Thirty-one experts participated. No validated criteria were used for the selection of the images. CONCLUSION: The first representations of atopic dermatitis are engravings of skin diseases described under the names of strophulus confertus (Willan, 1796), lichen agrius (Willan, 1796), porrigo larvalis (Bateman, 1816), and eczema rubrum (Rayer, 1835). Teledermatology techniques can be reliably applied to retrospective diagnosis.