RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The growing popularity of nail techniques based on acrylates has led to a higher frequency of sensitization in both nail technicians and users. OBJECTIVES: The study aimed to assess cases of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) caused by acrylates in individuals with occupational or non-occupational exposure to nail techniques. METHODS: A preliminary study was conducted on 30 patients with ACD caused by acrylates in nail techniques, who were patch tested from September 2022 to March 2023 at the First Department of Dermatology and Venereology of Andreas Syggros Hospital, Athens, Greece. RESULTS: Thirty female patients with ACD to acrylates were documented (15 users and 15 nail technicians and users). The most common allergens were: 2-hydroxyethyl methacrylate (HEMA), 2-hydroxypropyl methacrylate (HPMA) and ethyleneglycol dimethacrylate (EGDMA), which tested positive in all 30 patients (100.0%). Twenty patients (66.7%) had been exposed to dental procedures involving acrylates, before the onset of ACD. Nail technicians exhibited extensive skin lesions, 40.0% experienced ACD within the first year of work and 13.3% during their professional practice. Three of them (20.0%) had to discontinue their work. CONCLUSION: Acrylates have been identified as potent allergens, necessitating the implementation of safety measures for the use of these chemicals in nail techniques.
Asunto(s)
Cosméticos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Humanos , Femenino , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Acrilatos/efectos adversos , Proyectos Piloto , Grecia , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Metacrilatos/efectos adversos , Alérgenos , Cosméticos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Profesional/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Rubber accelerators are used in the production of rubber gloves and may cause contact allergy. OBJECTIVES: To estimate long-term trend and prevalence of contact allergy to rubber accelerators for a 30-year period in Denmark, high-risk occupations, and exposures. METHODS: Data from all patients with contact dermatitis consecutively patch tested at the department of Skin and Allergy Gentofte hospital with the rubber accelerators from the European baseline series (EBS) from 1990 to 2019, were analysed. Further, patients under suspicion of rubber accelerator contact allergy were additionally patch-tested with rubber accelerators from the specialised rubber series from 2005 to 2019 and these were additional extracted. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of contact allergy to one or more of the rubber accelerators from the EBS series was 2.7% with a significant decline in the first 12-years, followed by a stable frequency in the past 18-years. Associations with occupational contact dermatitis, hand dermatitis, and leg/foot dermatitis were found. Wet-work occupations were most often affected and gloves the most frequent exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Contact allergy to one or more of the rubber accelerators from the EBS is frequent and has been unchanged for several decades, which calls for prevention.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Hipersensibilidad al Látex , Humanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Goma/efectos adversos , Pruebas del Parche/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/complicaciones , Hipersensibilidad al Látex/epidemiología , Eccema/epidemiología , Eccema/complicaciones , Dinamarca/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: Allergic contact dermatitis (ACD) is a serious health and socio-economic problem. Accurate and reliable assessment of exposure to ACD factors in the work environment would increase quality of life and work of employees. The aim of this study was to assess the level of exposure of workers of a multidisciplinary hospital to the factors causing ACD. Material and Methods: The proprietary OSDES-16 questionnaire was used. The effectiveness of the OSDES-16 was confirmed statistically. The study included 230 employees of the medical center in Polanica Zdrój, divided into groups. Results: The differences in the overall assessment of exposure between the individual groups in the OSDES-16 scale were statistically insignificant (p > 0.05). There was no significant correlation between the current workplace and the level of exposure to ACD (p > 0.05). The level of exposure to ACD in the group of employees with work experience in the current position for more than 10 years was significantly higher than those working less than 6 years (p < 0.05). Conclusions: Nurses, midwives and paramedics are the occupational group most exposed to the development of contact allergy related to exposure to factors present in the work environment. The seniority of more than 10 years in the current position was linked with a higher level of occupational exposure.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Exposición Profesional , Humanos , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/complicaciones , Calidad de Vida , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Exposición Profesional/efectos adversos , Encuestas y CuestionariosAsunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Personal Militar , Humanos , Adhesivos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Professional cleaners are commonly affected by hand eczema (HE) due to wet work and exposure to cleaning products in the work environment. OBJECTIVE: To investigate (1) the prevalence of HE in a group of professional hospital cleaners, (2) the association of HE with various comorbidities and self-reported signs/symptoms of skin lesions and (3) the association of HE with various occupational and personal risk factors in the same population. METHODS: A cross-sectional questionnaire-based study including all cleaners working in three hospitals in Denmark. The questionnaire was composed of 35 questions. Prevalence is reported using proportions with 95% confidence intervals and compared using difference of proportions and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: A total of 122 out of 180 cleaners (response rate = 68%) participated in this study. The self-reported lifetime prevalence of HE among the cleaners was 30.3%, while the 1-year prevalence was 18.9%. HE was significantly associated with a history of atopic diseases. There was a significant correlation between having HE, and self-reported redness and itch of the hands in the last 12 months, as well as the use of hydrochloric acid ≥4 days/week during the last 12 months. Logistic regression analysis found HE significantly associated with washing hands ≥20 times during a working day and a history of atopic dermatitis. CONCLUSION: Cleaners are at an elevated risk of developing HE. More focus on education/information regarding the prevention and treatment of HE is necessary for the cleaning profession. Self-reported redness and itching of the hands may be a useful prediction of HE in cleaners.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Dermatosis de la Mano , Humanos , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/complicaciones , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Prevalencia , Estudios Transversales , Eccema/etiología , Eccema/complicaciones , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Hospitales , Prurito , Dinamarca/epidemiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/etiología , Dermatosis de la Mano/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: It is known that a large number of hairdressing apprentices (HA) develop occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) during schooling, but studies that address prevalence of contact sensitization in HAs with hand eczema are missing. OBJECTIVES: To assess the prevalence, incidence rate and clinical characteristics of OCD, including contact sensitization, in a sample of Croatian HAs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 408 HAs from 25 Croatian towns were examined at the beginning of education and monitored at the end of each school year. Clinical evaluation of skin changes was performed using the Osnabrueck Hand Eczema Severity Index (OHSI). Standard patch test (PT) with baseline and hairdresser series of contact allergens was performed in 46 HAs with skin changes lasting ≥3 months. RESULTS: The overall incidence rate of OCD was 32.3/100 person-years, and the 3-year prevalence 50.3%. Contact sensitization was found in 14 out of 46 (30.3%) HAs, with 10 of these 14 HAs (71.4%) sensitized to specific hairdressing allergens. The strongest reactions were found to PPD. HAs with positive PT had higher OHSI than HAs with negative patch test (median, IQR: 3, 2-4 vs. 2, 2-4). CONCLUSIONS: Contact sensitization to specific hairdressing chemicals was found in 71.4% of HAs with a positive patch test, supporting evidence on the early contact sensitization to occupational allergens among HAs.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Humanos , Incidencia , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Prevalencia , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/complicaciones , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Eccema/epidemiología , Pruebas del Parche/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The skin is the outermost layer of the human body and is continually exposed to numerous external stimuli, which can cause unwanted skin irritation. Occupational skin diseases are the most prevalent form of work-related illness and are found in a variety of sectors, particularly healthcare. During the recent COVID-19 pandemic, healthcare professionals experienced a variety of unexpected, unusual occupational skin diseases associated with COVID-19-engaged employment. Because the clinical characteristics of these types of skin inflammation are unique, this review focuses on the characteristics of a large category of occupational workers, namely COVID-19-engaged healthcare professionals. Furthermore, we examined the potential pathogeneses of occupational skin disorders associated with COVID-19-engaged labor, as well as different preventative methods.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Irritante , Dermatitis Profesional , Humanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Pandemias , Dermatitis Irritante/complicaciones , Dermatitis Irritante/epidemiología , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/complicaciones , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/complicaciones , Personal de SaludRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Batik is one of the Indonesian traditional arts made by decorating fabric using the resist dyeing technique. Currently, batik manufacturing serves as an important source of livelihood in Indonesia. However, the production process of traditional batik involves a range of chemicals and some repetitive physical movements, making batik production inseparable from physical and chemical hazards which increase the risk of developing occupational skin diseases (OSD). This study aimed to identify the risk factors related to OSD, including occupational contact dermatitis (OCD), among traditional batik manufacturing workers in Yogyakarta, Indonesia. RESULTS: The study demonstrated that working duration (≥ 8 h daily) and type of work (wet process only) were statistically significant as risk factors for developing OSD. While for OCD, our results found that gender (male), history of atopy, and type of work (all and wet phase only) were risk factors for OCD development among traditional batik manufacturing workers.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Enfermedades Profesionales , Masculino , Humanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Indonesia/epidemiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/complicaciones , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
The objective of this review is to identify work-related and personal risk factors for contact dermatitis (CD), and assess their association with this frequently occurring occupational disease. A systematic review of the literature from 1990 to June 2, 2020, was conducted using Medline and Embase. Prospective cohort and case-control studies were included, and meta-analyses were conducted when feasible. Quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation. Twenty-nine studies were identified, comprising 26 study populations and with a total of 846 209 participants investigating 52 risk factors for CD. Meta-analyses were performed for five risk factors, all of them for irritant contact dermatitis (ICD). Moderate-quality evidence was found for associations between wet work and ICD (OR: 1.56, 95%CI: 1.21-2.01). High-quality evidence was found for the association between atopic dermatitis and ICD (OR: 2.44, 95%CI: 1.89-3.15). There was no evidence for an association between ICD and sex or history of hand dermatitis, respiratory and mucosal atopy. In conclusion, several work-related and personal risk factors associated with CD were identified. Our data emphasize the need for the assessment of both, work-related and personal, risk factors to prevent occupational CD.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Irritante , Dermatitis Profesional , Humanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/epidemiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/complicaciones , Dermatitis Irritante/epidemiología , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
A case report of a dentist presenting with allergic contact dermatitis to methacrylates present in dental bonding agent applied on the dorsum of a gloved hand. The patient presented with a localized dermatitis to the dorsum of the non-dominant hand which can be described as a 'manual tray sign'.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Eccema , Dermatosis de la Mano , Humanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Metacrilatos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/complicaciones , Eccema/complicaciones , Torso , Dermatosis de la Mano/inducido químicamente , Dermatosis de la Mano/diagnóstico , Dermatosis de la Mano/complicaciones , Pruebas del Parche/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Commercial patch test substances do not cover all occupational contact allergens. Workplace materials and in-house test substances are tested to complement the investigation of occupational skin disease (OSD). OBJECTIVES: To quantify the additional value of testing workplace materials and non-commercial in-house test substances in the diagnosis of OSD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients files of 544 patients patch tested at the Finnish Institute of Occupational Health in 2015-2019 were reviewed for occupation, diagnoses and patch test results. RESULTS: OSD was diagnosed in 353 (64.9%) of the patients. A total of 206 (37.9%) patients had occupational allergic contact dermatitis (OACD). In 19 (3.5%) patients, the only clues to the diagnoses of OACD were positive reactions to workplace materials, and in 20 (3.7%) patients, the diagnosis of OACD was based on commercially unavailable test substances. In 167 OACD cases diagnosed by commercial test substances, additional causes were found in 17 by testing patients' own and non-commercial test substances. In 43 (7.9%) cases, positive reactions to workplace materials reinforced diagnoses based on commercial test substances. The overall additive value of testing own products was 16.7% (91 cases). CONCLUSION: We would have missed 39 (18.9%) of our 206 OACD cases if we had solely used commercial test substances.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Dermatología , Humanos , Pruebas del Parche/métodos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/complicaciones , Ocupaciones , Alérgenos/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Acrylates are synthetic thermoplastic resins used in numerous industries since their discovery in the mid-19th century. Known for their versatility in formulating various consumer, health care, and industrial products, acrylates also have come under scrutiny for their potential to cause allergic contact dermatitis (ACD). Allergic contact dermatitis to acrylates previously was largely occupational in nature, but the expanded use of acrylates in products ranging from nail cosmetics to medical devices has increasingly brought this allergy to the general population. Herein, we discuss the chemistry and allergenicity of acrylates and highlight common sources of exposure, clinical presentations, pertinent considerations for patch testing, and tips for the management/prevention of acrylate ACD. We hope to emphasize the shifting trend of exposure sources from the workplace to consumers, underlining the need for increased vigilance from physicians. Collaborative efforts among health care providers and patient education about allergen avoidance strategies are essential to mitigate potential complications arising from acrylate sensitization.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Humanos , Acrilatos/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/prevención & control , Alérgenos/efectos adversos , Uñas , Pruebas del Parche , Dermatitis Profesional/complicaciones , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Humanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/complicaciones , Resinas de Plantas , Pruebas del Parche/efectos adversosRESUMEN
A 42-year-old man working at a steel mill recognized itching and erythema on the dorsal surfaces of his hands for 2 weeks prior to his first visit to our department. Lichenized erythematous plaques were observed on the dorsal surfaces of his fingers and hands. A patch testing of the rubber part of the gloves showed a positive reaction. We also conducted a patch testing of metals to exclude a possibility of contact dermatitis mediated by metals as occupational materials. The patch testing of metals showed a positive reaction to zinc, which is not an occupational material in his steel mill, but his rubber gloves contained zinc in the rubber accelerators, which might have been the trigger that caused his allergic contact dermatitis. Contact dermatitis is the most common occupational skin disease, and various materials are the causative agents. Allergic reactions to rubber (latex) are classified into type I allergy and type IV allergy. Type IV allergic reaction is observed in rubber accelerators such as thiuram; however, our case showed that zinc allergy could be a possible causative agent in patients with contact dermatitis due to rubber gloves.
Asunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Adulto , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/complicaciones , Humanos , Masculino , Goma/efectos adversos , Acero , ZincAsunto(s)
Asteraceae , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Humanos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Especies Introducidas , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/complicaciones , Pruebas del Parche/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Desinfectantes , Dermatosis de la Mano , Desinfectantes para las Manos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/complicaciones , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/complicaciones , Desinfectantes/efectos adversos , Etilenodiaminas , Dermatosis de la Mano/inducido químicamente , Desinfectantes para las Manos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Pruebas del Parche/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto , Dermatitis Profesional , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/complicaciones , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Humanos , Pruebas del Parche/efectos adversos , Resinas de PlantasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies on the causes and consequences of occupational contact dermatitis (OCD) among young workers are non-existent. OBJECTIVES: Determine causes and consequences of OCD among workers younger than 35 years of age. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to 6251 workers younger than 35 years at notification with recognized OCD (response rate 47%). RESULTS: The most prevalent occupations were health care workers, kitchen workers, nursery teachers, and hairdressers and beauticians. Seventy-six percent still had eczema, and 77% of these had eczema half to all the time over the last 3 months, with 61% evaluating their eczema as moderate to very severe. Fifty-three percent had changed their occupation since notification, and 42.5% had lost their job because of OCD. Allergic OCD increased the odds ratio (OR) for facial or foot eczema, job loss, change in work tasks, difficulties finding work, decrease in income, and sick leave. Age at notification of 25 years of age or younger increased the risk of job loss and feeling restricted in choice of job. Workers in the food industry had a higher OR for job loss, whereas hairdressers and beauticians had a higher risk of job loss and a decrease in income. CONCLUSIONS: The severe, long-term consequences of OCD notification signify the need for further preventive strategies among young workers.