Helveticoside Exhibited p53-dependent Anticancer Activity Against Colorectal Cancer.

BACKGROUND: Investigation into the anti-cancer activities of natural products and their derivatives represents an efficient approach to develop safe and effective chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of colorectal cancer. Helveticoside is a biologically active component of the seed extract of Descurainia sophia. This compound has been reported to regulate the genes related to cell proliferation and apoptosis in lung cancer cells, however its anticancer activity has not been fully explored yet. METHODS: Cell viability was evaluated by MTT and Trypan blue exclusion assay; cell apoptosis was measured by flow cytometry; mitochondrial membrane potential was determined by using JC1-mitochondrial membrane potential assay kit; protein levels were determined by western blot assay; in vivo tumor growth was assessed in a xenograft nude mice model. RESULTS: The current study demonstrated the in vitro anti-cancer activity of helveticoside against colorectal cancer using colorectal cancer cells SW480 and HCT116. Moreover, induction of apoptosis was found to mediate the cytotoxic action of helveticoside on SW480 and HCT116 cells. Based on the decrease in the mitochondrial membrane potential, upregulation of Bax, downregulation of Bcl-2 and cleavage of caspase-3 and 9, apoptosis was induced by helveticoside via mitochondria-mediated intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathways in colorectal cancer cells. Besides, using p53-knockout SW480 cells, the cytotoxic action of helveticoside was found to be p53-dependent. More importantly, administration of helveticoside inhibited the growth of HCT116 cells derived-colorectal cancer xenograft in mice via activation of apoptosis. CONCLUSIONS: Helveticoside might be a potential candidate for the development of novel chemotherapeutic agents for the treatment of colorectal cancer, while the potential toxic effects of helveticoside may be worthy of further investigations.

Impact of Digitalis Use on Mortality in Japanese Patients With Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation　- A Subanalysis of the J-RHYTHM Registry.

BACKGROUND: Because the influence of digitalis use on the death of patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) remains controversial, a subanalysis of the J-RHYTHM Registry was performed.Methods and Results:A consecutive series of outpatients with AF from 158 institutions was enrolled and followed for 2 years or until the occurrence of an event. Among 7,406 patients with NVAF, 7,018 (age, 69.7±10.0 years; men, 71.1%) with information on antiarrhythmic drug and digitalis use at baseline were divided into 2 groups based on digitalis use. The influence of digitalis on death was investigated using a propensity score-matching model. In 802 patients treated with digitalis, all-cause death was significantly higher than in 6,216 patients with no digitalis use during the 2-year follow-up period (4.4% vs. 2.4%, unadjusted P<0.001). Digitalis use was significantly associated with all-cause death in the crude model (hazard ratio [HR] 1.85, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.28-2.68, P=0.001). However, after propensity score-matching, the association was not significant (HR 1.31, 95% CI 0.70-2.46, P=0.405). Older age, male sex, heart failure, coronary artery disease, and lower body mass index were significantly associated with all-cause death in NVAF patients treated with digitalis. CONCLUSIONS: Digitalis use was not independently associated with all-cause death, and several clinical confounding factors might contribute to increased mortality in NVAF patients treated with digitalis.

Clinical Use of Digitalis: A State of the Art Review.

The history of digitalis is rich and interesting, with the first use usually attributed to William Withering and his study on the foxglove published in 1785. However, some knowledge of plants with digitalis-like effects used for congestive heart failure (CHF) was in evidence as early as Roman times. The active components of the foxglove (Digitalis purpurea and Digitalis lanata) are classified as cardiac glycosides or cardiotonic steroids and include the well-known digitalis leaf, digitoxin, and digoxin; ouabain is a rapid-acting glycoside usually obtained from Strophanthus gratus. These drugs are potent inhibitors of cellular membrane sodium-potassium adenosine triphosphatase (Na+/K+-ATPase). For most of the twentieth century, digitalis and its derivatives, especially digoxin, were the available standard of care for CHF. However, as the century closed, many doubts, especially regarding safety, were raised about their use as other treatments for CHF, such as decreasing the preload of the left ventricle, were developed. Careful attention is needed to maintain the serum digoxin level at ≤ 1.0 ng/ml because of the very narrow therapeutic window of the medication. Evidence for benefit exists for CHF with reduced ejection fraction (EF), also referred to as heart failure with reduced EF (HFrEF), especially when considering the combination of mortality, morbidity, and decreased hospitalizations. However, the major support for using digoxin is in atrial fibrillation (AF) with a rapid ventricular response when a rate control approach is planned. The strongest support of all for digoxin is for its use in rate control in AF in the presence of a marginal blood pressure, since all other rate control medications contribute to additional hypotension. In summary, these days, digoxin appears to be of most use in HFrEF and in AF with rapid ventricular response for rate control, especially when associated with hypotension. The valuable history of the foxglove continues; it has been modified but not relegated to the garden or the medical history book, as some would advocate.

[New pharmacologic therapies for chronic heart failure]. / Neue medikamentöse Therapieansätze bei chronischer Herzinsuffizienz.

Heart failure is a disease with a high prevalence and incidence. New therapeutic approaches are needed to prevent the onset of heart failure and to reduce the high morbidity and mortality associated with this disease. An optimized therapy of arterial hypertension in patients with risk factors and the use of the SGLT2 inhibitor empagliflozin in type 2 diabetics are proven strategies to prevent heart failure. The therapeutic options in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction are still insufficient. In heart failure with reduced ejection fraction sacubitril/valsartan, the first approved angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor, is superior to an angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor. Whether digitalis affects the prognosis in heart failure remains unclear; however, serum concentration should be targeted at the lower therapeutic range. Iron supplementation in heart failure with reduced systolic function and iron deficiency improves symptoms and quality of life.

Association of digitalis treatment with outcomes following myocardial infarction in patients with heart failure or evidence of left ventricular dysfunction: an analysis from the High-Risk Myocardial Infarction Database Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Contradictory findings have been reported regarding the safety and efficacy of digitalis in patients recovering from acute myocardial infarction (MI). We studied the association of digitalis use with long-term and short-term prognosis in patients presenting with an acute MI complicated with heart failure (HF), left ventricular dysfunction, or both. METHODS AND RESULTS: Using the High-Risk MI Database Initiative combining data from 4 major clinical trials, totaling 27,673 patients, we investigated the association between digitalis use at baseline (3093 patients with digitalis and 24,580 without) with the rate of all-cause death, sudden cardiac death, cardiovascular death, HF hospitalization and the combination of the latter two, over a mean follow-up time of 2.7 years. Patients with and without atrial fibrillation (AF) were studied separately. After a propensity score-based analysis, among patients without AF, those receiving digitalis experienced a higher rate of all-cause [hazard ratio (HR) 1.54, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.42-1.67] and sudden cardiac death (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.44-1.89), compared to those not receiving digitalis; similar results were found for the other 3 endpoints (all HR around 1.6). In contrast, in AF patients, digitalis had a milder effect on all outcomes (all HR ≤ 1.12), with significant association only for the composite endpoint (HR 1.10, 95% CI 1.00-1.21, p = 0.049); comparable results were obtained at 30 days. Finally, the detrimental effect associated with digitalis use appeared to be more pronounced in patients with ejection fraction ≥ 40%. CONCLUSIONS: In MI survivors with HF and/or systolic dysfunction, digitalis was associated with a significant increased risk of death in patients without AF with mild to neutral associations for patients with AF. These findings raise concerns regarding the safety of digitalis in MI survivors with HF, especially for those without AF.

Digitalis Use and the Risk of Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Previous epidemiological studies have indicated an increased risk of breast cancer associated with digitalis medication, though results are inconsistent. We performed this systematic review of available epidemiological studies to clarify the association between digitalis use and the risk of breast cancer. METHODS: A search of studies published through May 2016 in MEDLINE and EMBASE databases was performed, supplemented by manual searches of reference lists. The quality of the included studies was assessed, and relative risks were pooled using both random- and fixed-effect models. RESULTS: Three case-control studies and six cohort studies were identified. Meta-analysis generated a pooled relative risk of 1.35 (95% confidence interval 1.24-1.46) in both fixed- and random-effect models. The heterogeneity test suggested low heterogeneity across studies. The funnel plot suggested no existence of publication bias. Subgroup analysis by study design revealed an increased risk of breast cancer associated with digitalis use from cohort studies only (relative risk = 1.39, 95% confidence interval 1.27-1.52), rather than from case-control studies. Studies with adjustment for tobacco smoking or body mass index generated lower overall estimates than those not adjusted. CONCLUSIONS: Existing epidemiological evidence regarding the association between digitalis use and the risk of breast cancer remains inconclusive and more well-designed studies are still needed.

Effects of digitalis on mortality in a large cohort of implantable cardioverter defibrillator recipients: results of a long-term follow-up study in 1020 patients.

AIMS: The effects of digitalis on mortality in patients with structural heart disease are controversially discussed. We aimed to assess the effects of digitalis administration in implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) recipients. METHODS AND RESULTS: This retrospective analysis comprises 1020 consecutive patients who received an ICD at our institution and who were followed for up to 10 years (median 37 months). A total of 438 patients were receiving digitalis at the time of ICD implantation and 582 did not. Patients on digitalis were more often in atrial fibrillation and had more often a prolonged QRS duration of ≥120 ms, a severely impaired left ventricular ejection fraction, and higher New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification heart failure. Crude Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly higher mortality in patients on digitalis (HR = 2.47; 95% CI 1.87-3.25; P = 0.001). After adjustment for patient characteristics found statistically significant in adjusted Cox regression analysis (age, gender, NYHA classification, and QRS duration of ≥120 ms), a HR of 1.65 remained (95% CI 1.14-2.39; P = 0.01). Patients on digitalis died more often from cardiac arrhythmic and cardiac non-arrhythmic causes than patients not on digitalis (P = 0.04). There was no difference in mortality between patients receiving digitoxin and those receiving digoxin (HR = 1.55; 95% CI 0.74-3.25; P = 0.25). CONCLUSION: In this large ICD patient population, digitalis use at baseline was independently associated with increased mortality even after careful adjustment for possible confounders. Digitalis should be used with great caution in this population.

Dronedarone and digitalis: individually reduced post-repolarization refractoriness enhances life-threatening arrhythmias.

AIMS: Interaction between dronedarone and digitalis has been discussed as a possible cause for increased mortality in the presence of dronedarone observed in the PALLAS trial. The aim of this study was to assess possible proarrhythmic effects of dronedarone in combination with digitalis in an experimental whole heart model. METHODS AND RESULTS: Twenty-six female rabbits underwent chronic oral treatment with dronedarone (50 mg/kg/day for 6 weeks). Twenty-four rabbits received placebo. Heart failure was induced by rapid ventricular pacing. Sham-operated rabbits received a right-ventricular pacing lead but were not paced. Thereafter, hearts were isolated and Langendorff-perfused. Monophasic action potentials and a 12 lead electrocardiogram showed a dose-dependent decrease of QT interval, APD90, effective refractory periods, and postrepolarization refractoriness in control hearts and dronedarone-pretreated hearts after application of ouabain (0.1 and 0.2 µM). After acute application of ouabain, ventricular fibrillation (VF) was inducible by programmed ventricular stimulation in 6 of 12 untreated sham hearts (38 episodes) as compared with 7 of 11 dronedarone-pretreated sham hearts (76 episodes). In untreated failing hearts, 6 of 12 hearts were inducible (47 episodes) as compared with 7 of 15 hearts dronedarone-pretreated failing hearts (93 episodes). CONCLUSION: In this study, ouabain treatment resulted in an increased ventricular vulnerability in chronically dronedarone-pretreated control and failing hearts. Ouabain led to a significant abbreviation of ventricular repolarization. This was more marked in dronedarone-pretreated hearts and resulted in an elevated incidence of VF. This may help to interpret the results of the PALLAS trial.

Subcellular mechanisms underlying digitalis-induced arrhythmias: role of calcium/calmodulin-dependent kinase II (CaMKII) in the transition from an inotropic to an arrhythmogenic effect.

Cardiotonic glycosides or digitalis are positive inotropes used in clinical practice for the treatment of heart failure, which also exist as endogenous ligands of the Na(+)/K(+) ATPase. An increase in the intracellular Ca2+ content mediates their positive inotropic effect, but has also been proposed as a trigger of life-threatening arrhythmias. Although the mechanisms involved in the positive inotropic effect of these compounds have been extensively studied, those underlying their arrhythmogenic action remain ill defined. Recent evidence has placed posttranslational modifications of the ryanodine receptor (RyR2), leading to arrhythmogenic Ca2+ release, in the centre of the storm. In this review we will examine, in depth, the mechanisms that generate the arrhythmogenic substrate, focussing on the role played by the RyR2 and how its CaMKII-dependent regulation may shift the balance from an inotropic to an arrhythmogenic Ca2+ release. Finally, we will provide evidence suggesting that stabilising RyR2 function could result in a potential new strategy to prevent cardiotonic glycoside-induced arrhythmias that could lead to a safer and more extensive use of these compounds.

Digoxin--'a friend or foe'.

The authors report about a patient who was admitted after developing nausea, vomiting, change in vision and lethargy. She was on digoxin 250 mcg once daily among all her other medications in the wake of a recent stroke that was accompanied by atrial fibrillation (AF). Her digitalis levels shortly before and on admission were 3.4 and 2.9 ng/ml, respectively. Her admission rhythm was slowly conducted AF at an average of 35 bpm. After a careful assessment by the cardiology consultant in charge, she received Digibind infusion for a chronic digitalis toxicity with the digoxin immune Fab dose based on the formula recommended in the product literature.(3) A few days observation on the ward ensured that her resting heart rate rose to 65 bpm and that she did not need a pacemaker for a slow AF. Her functional status remained reasonably good as she enjoyed a satisfactory recovery postthrombolysis for her recent stroke.

Digitalis does not improve left atrial mechanical dysfunction after successful electrical cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation.

This study was designed to investigate whether administration of digitalis could improve mechanical function of left atrial appendage (LAA) and left atrium prospectively in patients with atrial stunning. Fifty-four consecutive patients in whom atrial stunning was observed immediately after cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation (AF) were randomized into digitalis or control group for 1 week following cardioversion. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) were performed prior to, immediately following, 1 day after and 1 week after cardioversion to measure transmitral flow velocity and LAA flow velocity. Electrical cardioversion of AF elicited significantly slower left atrial appendage peak emptying velocity (LAA-PEV) and peak filling velocity (LAA-PFV) immediately following cardioversion in both groups. 1 day post cardioversion, there were no significant differences in transmitral E wave, A wave, E/A ratio, LAA-PEV, LAA-PFV or left atrial appendage ejection fraction (LAA-EF) between digitalis and control groups. 1 week post cardioversion, no significant differences were found in transmitral E wave, A wave, E/A ratio, LAA-PEV, LAA-PFV or LAA-EF between the two groups. The occurrence rates of spontaneous echo contrast were not significantly different between digitalis and control groups one day and one week post cardioversion. In conclusion, digitalis did not improve left atrial and appendage mechanical dysfunction following cardioversion of chronic AF. Digitalis did not prevent the development of spontaneous echo contrast in left atrial chamber and appendage. This may be due to the fact that digitalis aggravates intracellular calcium overload induced by chronic AF and has a negative effect on ventricular rate.

[The clinical efficacy and safety study of Esculin and Digitalis glycosides Eye Drops in treating ametropic asthenopia].

OBJECTIVE: To study the clinical efficacy and safety of the Esculin and Digitalis glycosides Eye Drops used in the patients of ametropic asthenopia. METHODS: Multicenter clinical trial. Asthenopia patients were chosen from eleven hospitals cross China from July, 2008 to January, 2009. The experiment was conducted asthenopia patients who used the Esculin and Digitalis glycosides Eye Drops for 4 weeks continuously. Symptoms of asthenopia, UCVA (uncorrected vision acuity), refraction, amplitude of accommodation, accommodative lag, accommodative sensitivity and positive/negative relative accommodation were measured at different time points, such as treated before, 1 week and 4 week in treated after. RESULTS: After the 4-week's use of Esculin and Digitalis glycosides Eye Drops, each subjective symptom of the patients was decreased significantly (F=353.30, P<0.05). In addition, most of the objective exams of accommodation ability were significantly improved, such as UCVA (left eye: F=23.39, P<0.05; right eye: F=15.62, P<0.05), refraction (left eye: F=10.34, P<0.05; right eye: F=17.13, P<0.05), amplitude of accommodation (left eye: F=14.46, P<0.05; right eye: F=8.29, P<0.05; eyes: F=13.86, P<0.05), accommodative lag (F=14.89, P<0.05) and accommodative sensitivity (left eye: F=62.67, P<0.05; right eye: F=68.77, P<0.05; eyes: F=82.74, P<0.05). And no patient appeared any adverse reaction in whole experiment. CONCLUSIONS: Esculin and Digitalis glycosides Eye Drops is effective and safety for use in the patients of ametropia asthenopia.

Digitalis: a dangerous drug in atrial fibrillation? An analysis of the SPORTIF III and V data.

OBJECTIVE: In heart failure, digitalis increases exercise capacity and reduces morbidity, but has no effect on survival. This raises the suspicion that the inotropic benefits of digitalis may be counteracted by serious adverse effects. Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) were studied to clarify this. DESIGN: In the Stroke Prevention using an ORal Thrombin Inhibitor in atrial Fibrillation (SPORTIF) III and V studies, 7329 patients with AF at moderate-to-high risk were randomised to preventive treatment of thromboembolism, either with warfarin or the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran. The survival of users and non-users of digitalis was investigated. RESULTS: At baseline, 53.4% of the study population used digitalis, and these patients had a higher mortality than non-users (255/3911 (6.5%) vs 141/3418 (4.1%), p<0.001; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.58 (95% CI 1.29 to 1.94)). Digitalis users also had more baseline risk factors. After multivariate risk factor adjustment, the increased mortality persisted (p<0.001; HR = 1.53 (95% CI 1.22 to 1.92 vs 1.23 to 1.92)). CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that digitalis, like other inotropic drugs, may increase mortality. This may be concealed in heart failure, but be revealed in patients with AF, who need the rate-reducing effect of digitalis, but do not benefit much from an increased inotropy. Cautious interpretation of the data is mandatory since the patients were not randomised with respect to digitalis use.