RESUMEN
Diplopia is a disappointing and, at times, unanticipated consequence of what might otherwise be considered anatomically successful strabismus surgery. In this study, we review the existing literature regarding diplopia after strabismus surgery in the context of the senior author's experience. We divide postoperative diplopia types into cases that occur in the setting of normal binocular vision (or "normal" suppression) vs. cases that are the consequence of rare or anomalous sensorial adaptations. We then discuss how to identify patients at greatest risk based on history and preoperative testing, and we offer strategies for managing these sometimes-challenging cases.
Asunto(s)
Diplopía , Músculos Oculomotores/cirugía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estrabismo/cirugía , Visión Binocular , Diplopía/clasificación , Diplopía/etiología , Diplopía/fisiopatología , Humanos , Músculos Oculomotores/fisiopatología , PronósticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the surgical outcomes using polyetheretherketone (PEEK) patient-specific prostheses produced by computer-aided design and manufacturing for primary and secondary reconstruction in patients with craniofacial defects. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 13 patients who underwent reconstruction for craniofacial defects using PEEK patient-specific implants (PSI). Eight patients underwent single-step primary reconstruction using individual custom-made surgical guides and custom-made prostheses during the same surgery; five patients underwent delayed reconstruction. The material used to manufacture the implants was PEEK in 13 cases. All patients underwent esthetic examination, ophthalmological examination, and radiological evaluation during the preoperative and follow-up periods. The operation duration and short- and long-term complications were recorded. RESULTS: The shape and global position of the implants were satisfactory in each case. Fitting of the implant during surgery required extensive adaptation in 1 case and minor in 11 cases. Of 13 implants, 11 adequately restored a morphological complex area with satisfactory cosmetic results. No complications related to the implants were reported. CONCLUSION: Reconstruction for cranio-facial defects using PEEK computer-aided designed and manufactured implants is a promising new technique that allows for accurate restoration of the complex 3D anatomy of the craniofacial region.
Asunto(s)
Materiales Biocompatibles/química , Cetonas/química , Neoplasias Orbitales/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Polietilenglicoles/química , Prótesis e Implantes , Adulto , Anciano , Benzofenonas , Interfase Hueso-Implante/diagnóstico por imagen , Diseño Asistido por Computadora , Diplopía/clasificación , Estética , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Imagenología Tridimensional/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Neoplasias Orbitales/diagnóstico por imagen , Planificación de Atención al Paciente , Polímeros , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Diseño de Prótesis , Implantación de Prótesis/métodos , Reoperación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada Espiral/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Campos Visuales/fisiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate the performance of motor, diplopia, and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) criteria when analyzing outcomes of adult strabismus surgery. DESIGN: Cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: We studied 159 adults undergoing 171 strabismus surgeries. METHODS: All patients underwent clinical assessment preoperatively and 6 weeks postoperatively, including completion of Adult Strabismus-20 HRQOL questionnaires. Preoperatively, strabismus was classified as either diplopic (n = 117), nondiplopic (n = 38), or atypical diplopic (n = 16). To assess performance of motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria, success was defined a priori and applied separately and in combinations. For success: (1) motor criteria, <10 prism diopters by simultaneous prism cover test; (2) diplopia criteria, none or only rare in primary distance and for reading; (3) HRQOL criteria, exceeding previously reported 95% limits of agreement (LOA). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Surgical success rate when applying motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria alone and in combinations. RESULTS: Overall, success rates were 90% for motor criteria, 74% for diplopia criteria, and 60% for HRQOL criteria. Combining criteria, the highest success rate was for motor plus diplopia criteria (67%) and the lowest success rate was when combining motor, diplopia, and HRQOL criteria (50%). CONCLUSIONS: Applying motor criteria alone yields the highest success rates when evaluating outcomes in adult strabismus surgery, but motor criteria do not fully represent the patient's postoperative status. Combining diplopia criteria with motor criteria provides a more clinically relevant standard for judging the success of adult strabismus surgery. For HRQOL criteria, exceeding 95% LOA at 6 weeks postoperatively seems to be a difficult hurdle to clear for some individual patients, and evaluating change in HRQOL score may be more useful in cohort studies.
Asunto(s)
Músculos Oculomotores/cirugía , Estrabismo/cirugía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios de Cohortes , Diplopía/clasificación , Femenino , Estado de Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Músculos Oculomotores/fisiopatología , Calidad de Vida , Estrabismo/fisiopatología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Resultado del Tratamiento , Visión Binocular/fisiología , Agudeza Visual/fisiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to compare the functional and aesthetic results of fractured orbital wall reconstruction with an auricular cartilage graft or absorbable polyacid copolymer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients with blow-out orbital fracture/orbital floor associated or not with the medial wall were assessed by the same craniofacial surgical group. All were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively by an ophthalmologist for diplopia, enophthalmos, exophthalmos, sensitivity, ophthalmic reflexes, intraocular pressure, and visual field.The patients were subjected to a preoperative facial multislice computed tomographic scan, repeated 6 months after surgery. Eight patients underwent reconstruction with an auricular cartilage graft, and 12 patients, with blade absorbable polyacid copolymer. Subtarsal access was used for all patients. RESULTS: Two patients showed temporary ectropion, 1 in each group. All patients presented satisfactory ocular function, and all tests revealed good orbital delineation, orbital symmetry, periorbital sinus individualization, and reduction of blow-out. CONCLUSIONS: The blow-out orbital wall reconstruction can be performed with the use of an auricular cartilage or with a blade absorbable copolymer without differences regarding functional or aesthetic complications and sequelae.
Asunto(s)
Implantes Absorbibles , Materiales Biocompatibles , Cartílago Auricular/trasplante , Ácido Láctico , Fracturas Orbitales/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Ácido Poliglicólico , Adulto , Diplopía/clasificación , Ectropión/etiología , Enoftalmia/clasificación , Estética , Exoftalmia/clasificación , Movimientos Oculares/fisiología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Presión Intraocular/fisiología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Trastornos de la Motilidad Ocular/clasificación , Fracturas Orbitales/clasificación , Parestesia/etiología , Copolímero de Ácido Poliláctico-Ácido Poliglicólico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estudios Prospectivos , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/instrumentación , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Enfermedades del Nervio Trigémino/etiología , Campos Visuales/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Our aim was to compare autogenous nasal septal cartilage and conchal cartilage as grafts for reconstruction of orbital blowout fractures. Twenty-two patients with blowout fractures were randomly assigned to two groups for treatment with a graft of nasal septal cartilage or conchal cartilage. Patients were evaluated for the presence of enophthalmos, diplopia, dysfunction of the infraorbital nerve, and restriction of the ocular muscles. Patients with enophthalmos of more than 2 mm were included in the study, and were followed up postoperatively at 10 days, 1 month, and 3-6 months. The patients treated with a nasal septal cartilage graft had significantly better correction of enophthalmos than those treated with conchal cartilage (p=0.02) after 10 days (p=0.02), 1 month (p=0.004), and 3-6 months (p=0.001). There was significantly less residual enophthalmos in the nasal septal graft group after 1 month (0.91 compared with 1.72 mm, p=0.02), and after 3-6 months (1.0 compared with 2.54 mm, p=0.008). Correction of enophthalmos was considerably better in patients who were operated on within 4 weeks of injury. We think that nasal septal cartilage is a better graft than conchal cartilage for reconstruction of blowout fractures. The time to intervention (the earlier the better) is a critical point in the correction of enophthalmos.
Asunto(s)
Cartílagos Nasales/trasplante , Fracturas Orbitales/cirugía , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/métodos , Cornetes Nasales/trasplante , Diplopía/clasificación , Enoftalmia/clasificación , Enoftalmia/terapia , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Masculino , Trastornos de la Motilidad Ocular/clasificación , Músculos Oculomotores/fisiopatología , Órbita/inervación , Parestesia/clasificación , Factores de Tiempo , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Binocular diplopia occurs from misalignment of the eyes. The fixation object is imaged onto the fovea of one eye and a nonfoveal region of the misaligned eye, creating diplopia. Treatment options include ocular occlusion, monovision optical correction, prism glasses, strabismus surgery, and chemodenervation. Ocular occlusion and monovision optical correction enable the patient to ignore the image from the misaligned eye. Prism glasses alter the light pathways so that the fixation object is imaged onto the fovea of both eyes, despite ocular misalignment. Strabismus surgery and chemodenervation attempt to restore ocular alignment. This article reviews the mechanisms and indications for each of these treatment options for patients with diplopia.
Asunto(s)
Toxinas Botulínicas/uso terapéutico , Diplopía/terapia , Anteojos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Oftalmológicos/métodos , Diplopía/clasificación , Diplopía/patología , Humanos , Estrabismo/cirugíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To develop new methods for quantifying diplopia and test their validity, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness to treatment. DESIGN: Prospective case series. PARTICIPANTS: Adult patients with diplopia in 2 tertiary referral practices. Diagnosis included cranial nerve palsies, thyroid eye disease, supranuclear palsies, and ocular myasthenia gravis. METHODS: The new diplopia questionnaire and cervical range of motion (CROM) diplopia examination were tested in a 15-patient validity study against the standard diplopia field performed on the Goldmann perimeter (each scored 0 [no diplopia] to 100 [constant diplopia in all fields]). The test-retest reliability of the CROM diplopia examination was determined in 27 patients. The responsiveness to treatment of the diplopia questionnaire and the CROM examination was tested in 15 patients who underwent strabismus surgery or received systemic prednisone for ocular myasthenia gravis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Validity was evaluated by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) compared with the standard Goldmann diplopia field. Test-rest reliability was evaluated by the ICC. Responsiveness to treatment was evaluated by comparing pretreatment and posttreatment scores. RESULTS: There was excellent agreement between the diplopia questionnaire score and Goldmann diplopia field score (ICC, 0.90) and between the CROM diplopia examination score and Goldmann diplopia field score (ICC, 0.88). Intertester reliability of the CROM diplopia examination score was excellent (ICC, 0.87; 95% confidence interval, 0.74-0.94). Postintervention scores were significantly lower than baseline (P = 0.0003 for CROM and P = 0.0001 for the questionnaire), with a median postintervention improvement of 48 for the CROM diplopia score (quartiles 12-68) and 36 for the diplopia questionnaire (quartiles 20-52). CONCLUSIONS: Our new diplopia questionnaire and new CROM diplopia examination are valid, reliable, and responsive measures of diplopia severity. The tests are easy to administer and require less expensive and less cumbersome equipment than previously available.
Asunto(s)
Diplopía/diagnóstico , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Anciano , Diplopía/clasificación , Diplopía/etiología , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuello , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Estudios Prospectivos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estrabismo/complicaciones , Pruebas del Campo Visual/métodos , Campos VisualesRESUMEN
Visual impairment in patients with diplopia can be assessed using a scoring method in front of a tangent screen. The primary position is the starting position for these measurements. For medicolegal judgement the scoring is based on a suggestion of Haase and Steinhorst, ranging from a disability of 0% to 25%. A new proposal for scoring the field of binocular single vision (BSV) is made here: A field between 30 degrees right and left gaze, 20 degrees upgaze and 40 degrees downgaze is defined as used under every day conditions. It is divided such that diplopia in one lateral half field corresponds to 13% disability, in the upper half 10% and in the lower 18%. Patients suffering from a unilateral superior oblique palsy often show a slight torticollis. In these cases the habitually assumed head position should be taken as the starting posture for the tangent screen measurements.
Asunto(s)
Diplopía/diagnóstico , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Testimonio de Experto/legislación & jurisprudencia , Tortícolis/diagnóstico , Nervio Abducens/fisiopatología , Diplopía/clasificación , Diplopía/etiología , Diplopía/fisiopatología , Determinación de la Elegibilidad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Oftalmoplejía/clasificación , Oftalmoplejía/diagnóstico , Oftalmoplejía/etiología , Oftalmoplejía/fisiopatología , Tortícolis/clasificación , Tortícolis/etiología , Tortícolis/fisiopatología , Visión Binocular/fisiología , Campos Visuales/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Eight patients with intractable diplopia are presented. A classification of intractable diplopia is proposed, as well as a possible unifying view of its pathogenesis. Currently available treatment modalities are reviewed.
Asunto(s)
Diplopía/etiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Diplopía/clasificación , Diplopía/terapia , Esotropía/complicaciones , Esotropía/cirugía , Exotropía/complicaciones , Exotropía/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Cuidados Paliativos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Estrabismo/complicaciones , Estrabismo/cirugíaRESUMEN
In case of motility disturbances due to orbital fractures generally a vertical diplopia -- that means a vertical restriction of the motility of the globe -- is found. The classification into four types according to Friemel allows a differentiation between mechanical motility disturbances and those of other origin; furthermore a prediction can be made about the extent of the field of diplopia and about the involved position of gaze. In addition the urgency of a primary reconstruction of the orbit and the prognosis of a late eye muscle surgery can be estimated by this classification. It is of differential diagnostic importance that isolated injuries of the eye muscles and the check ligaments, an intraorbital haemorrhage and a subtotal paresis of the oculomotor nerve can show a similar clinical picture as usually found with orbital fractures. The early diagnosis of ocular motility disturbances caused by orbital trauma is of essential importance for the proper treatment and the recovery of binocular single vision.