Diagnostic Value of 3.0 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Active Crohn's Disease.

BACKGROUND: Magnetic resonance enteroclysis (MRE) has been widely applied to diagnose Crohn's disease (CD). Magnetic resonance (MR) at 3.0 T improves signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), shortens image acquisition time, and shows more advantages. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to retrospectively analyze the diagnostic value of 3.0 T MR imaging for active CD. METHODS: 48 CD patients hospitalized in our hospital from January 2021 to December 2022 were selected as the study subjects. These 48 CD patients underwent both double-balloon enteroscopy and 3.0 T MRE. All patients' arterial phase signal, venous phase signal, bowel wall, and bowel lumen of MRE were observed to identify whether they suffered from active CD. Based on the results of enteroscopy, the number of true positives, true negatives, false negatives, and false positives diagnosed by MRE were screened; next, the diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of MRE in assessing active CD were calculated. RESULTS: Of the 48 patients, 39 were diagnosed with small bowel CD by MRE, which was not significantly different from the results of enteroscopy (P>0.05). According to MRE diagnostic results, the arterial phase predominantly presented high signal intensity, and the venous phase mainly presented low signal intensity or isointensity. Small bowel CD lesions were primarily characterized by bowel wall thickening, rare pneumatosis enhancement of the bowel wall, bowel lumen pneumatosis or dilatation, and rare strictures. Besides, MRE presented an accuracy of 93.75%, sensitivity of 97.37%, and specificity of 80.00% in diagnosing CD. CONCLUSION: 3.0 T MR imaging has diagnostic value for active CD and shows certain clinical application value.

Double balloon enteroscopy versus single balloon enteroscopy: A comparative study.

Device assisted enteroscopy (DAE) like the double balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and single balloon enteroscopy (SBE) are postulated to ease small bowel examination and performance of therapy. However, studies comparing the effectiveness of these 2 modalities have yielded varying results. The aim of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of SBE and DBE. We retrospectively reviewed records of patients who underwent DBE (n = 82) or SBE (n = 45) for small bowel exam in our unit from January 2014 to January 2022. Our primary outcomes were to compare the technical success and diagnostic success rates between DBE and SBE. Our secondary outcomes were to compare the therapeutic success, and complication rates. The main indications were suspected GI bleeding (DBE 41.5% vs SBE 48.9%), iron deficiency anemia (DBE 9.8% vs SBE 4.4%) and small bowel lesions (DBE 28.0% vs SBE 44.4%) detected either from prior capsule endoscopy or radiological imaging. Majority of the enteroscopy exam was by antegrade approach (DBE 67.1% vs SBE 77.8%). We found no significant difference in the technical success (DBE 95.1% vs SBE 97.8%, P = .46), diagnostic success (DBE 69.5% vs SBE 77.8%, P = .36) and the therapeutic success rate (DBE 63.2% vs SBE 54.3%, P = .09) between the groups. Complications occurred in 1 case from each group (mucosal tear). None of the complications were major. In patients who underwent enteroscopy, the diagnostic and therapeutic performance of SBE is similar to DBE. Both procedures were safe with low complication rates.

Detection of residual stones by peroral direct cholangioscopy in patients with intrahepatic stones after hepaticojejunostomy: a prospective study (with video).

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: The difficulty in radiographic confirmation of the presence of stones remains challenging in the treatment of intrahepatic bile duct (IHBD) stones in patients after hepaticojejunostomy (HJ). Peroral direct cholangioscopy (PDCS) enables direct observation of the bile duct and is useful for detecting and removing residual stones; however, its effectiveness is not clearly established in this clinical context. METHODS: This single-center, single-arm, prospective study included 44 patients with IHBD who underwent bowel reconstruction with HJ during the study period. Stone removal was performed by using short-type double-balloon enteroscopy. After balloon-occluded cholangiography, the double-balloon enteroscopy was exchanged for an ultra-slim endoscope through the balloon overtube for PDCS. The primary end point was the rate of residual stones detected by PDCS. Secondary end points were success rate of PDCS, residual stone removal with PDCS, procedure time for PDCS, procedure-related adverse events, and stone recurrence rate. RESULTS: PDCS was successful in 39 (89%) of 44 patients, among whom residual stones were detected in 16 (41%) (95% CI, 28%-54%). Twelve patients (75%) had residual stones <5 mm. Stone removal was successful in 15 (94%) patients, and median procedure time for PDCS was 16 minutes (interquartile range, 10-26 minutes). The rate of procedure-related adverse events was 7% (3 of 44); all adverse events improved with conservative treatment. During the median follow-up of 2.1 years (interquartile range, 1.4-3.3 years), the overall probability of recurrence-free status at 1, 2, and 3 years was 100%, 92%, and 86%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: PDCS is a safe and effective procedure for complete stone removal in patients with IHBD stones after HJ.

Crohn's disease with multiple jejunum and ileum lesions: A case report.

Crohn's disease (CD) affecting the jejunum and ileum is uncommon and its diagnosis can be challenging. This case report describes a 35 year old male patient who had been e xper iencing intermi ttent periu mbilica l pain , di arrho ea and fever for five years. Despite undergoing gastroscopy, co lo noscopy and capsule endoscopy; no s ignific ant abnormal ities were found. This case was se en at the Shenzhen Ho spital of Traditional Chinese Medi ci ne; Shenzhen, China. However, the pa tient u nder went a doubl e-balloon enteroscopy (DBE), which revealed multip le ulcers in the jejunum and ileum, leadin g to a confirmed diagnosis of CD. The patient was successfully treated with infliximab t o rel ieve sy mptoms. DBE can be par ticularly valuable in diagnosing CD in young patients with symptoms when conventional endoscopic techniques have been unsuccessfu l. This case highlights the impor tance of considering small bowel disease in patients wit h CD symptoms and the potential benefits of DBE in diagnosing such cases.

A newly developed deep learning-based system for automatic detection and classification of small bowel lesions during double-balloon enteroscopy examination.

BACKGROUND: Double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) is a standard method for diagnosing and treating small bowel disease. However, DBE may yield false-negative results due to oversight or inexperience. We aim to develop a computer-aided diagnostic (CAD) system for the automatic detection and classification of small bowel abnormalities in DBE. DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 5201 images were collected from Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University to construct a detection model for localizing lesions during DBE, and 3021 images were collected to construct a classification model for classifying lesions into four classes, protruding lesion, diverticulum, erosion & ulcer and angioectasia. The performance of the two models was evaluated using 1318 normal images and 915 abnormal images and 65 videos from independent patients and then compared with that of 8 endoscopists. The standard answer was the expert consensus. RESULTS: For the image test set, the detection model achieved a sensitivity of 92% (843/915) and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.947, and the classification model achieved an accuracy of 86%. For the video test set, the accuracy of the system was significantly better than that of the endoscopists (85% vs. 77 ± 6%, p < 0.01). For the video test set, the proposed system was superior to novices and comparable to experts. CONCLUSIONS: We established a real-time CAD system for detecting and classifying small bowel lesions in DBE with favourable performance. ENDOANGEL-DBE has the potential to help endoscopists, especially novices, in clinical practice and may reduce the miss rate of small bowel lesions.

Device-assisted enteroscopy performance measures in the United Kingdom: DEEP-UK quality improvement project.

BACKGROUND: Device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE) has become a well-established diagnostic and therapeutic tool for the management of small-bowel pathology. We aimed to evaluate the performance measures for DAE across the UK against the quality benchmarks proposed by the European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE). METHODS: We retrospectively collected data on patient demographics and DAE performance measures from electronic endoscopy records of consecutive patients who underwent DAE for diagnostic and therapeutic purposes across 12 enteroscopy centers in the UK between January 2017 and December 2022. RESULTS: A total of 2005 DAE procedures were performed in 1663 patients (median age 60 years; 53% men). Almost all procedures (98.1%) were performed for appropriate indications. Double-balloon enteroscopy was used for most procedures (82.0%), followed by single-balloon enteroscopy (17.2%) and spiral enteroscopy (0.7%). The estimated depth of insertion was documented in 73.4% of procedures. The overall diagnostic yield was 70.0%. Therapeutic interventions were performed in 42.6% of procedures, with a success rate of 96.6%. Overall, 78.0% of detected lesions were marked with a tattoo. Patient comfort was significantly better with the use of deep sedation compared with conscious sedation (99.7% vs. 68.5%; P<0.001). Major adverse events occurred in only 0.6% of procedures. CONCLUSIONS: Performance measures for DAE in the UK meet the ESGE quality benchmarks, with high diagnostic and therapeutic yields, and a low incidence of major adverse events. However, there is room for improvement in optimizing sedation practices, standardizing the depth of insertion documentation, and adopting marking techniques to aid in the follow-up of detected lesions.

Small Intestinal Arteriovenous Malformation Treated by Double-balloon Endoscopy.

A 42-year-old man was referred to our hospital because of anemia. The patient underwent gastroscopy and colonoscopy, but no bleeding site was detected. Abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) showed vascular dilatation along the wall of the small intestine. Small bowel capsule endoscopy and antegrade double-balloon endoscopy (DBE) were performed, and the patient was diagnosed with a small intestinal arteriovenous malformation (AVM). The AVM was clipped using DBE. After clipping, abdominal contrast-enhanced CT and small bowel angiography revealed the disappearance of the AVM. DBE may be a viable therapeutic option, helping avoid surgery and its associated risks.

The evolving role of device-assisted enteroscopy: The state of the art as of August 2023.

Device-assisted enteroscopy (DAE), balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) in particular, has become a routine endoscopic procedure which has revolutionized our approach to small-bowel disease. Evidence demonstrating the efficacy and safety of BAE spans over 22-years of experience, making it an established pillar of minimally invasive care. The robust evidence for BAE's safety and efficacy has now been incorporated into international clinical guidelines, technical reviews, benchmarking performance measures and curricula. The more recently introduced motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) which had replaced the previous manual version, abruptly ended its 7-year stint in clinical practice, when it was withdrawn and recalled from the market by its manufacturing company in July 2023, due to several associated serious adverse events (including fatalities). This article, written by the original developer of double-balloon enteroscopy (DBE) and other recognized international experts and pioneers in this field, focuses mainly on the technical aspects, evolving indications, and equipment-related technological advances. Despite the very recent withdrawal of MSE from clinical practice, for completeness, this technology and its technique is still briefly covered here, albeit importantly, along with a short description of reported, associated, serious adverse events which have contributed to its withdrawal/recall from the market and clinical practice.

Effectiveness and safety of novel motorized spiral enteroscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Motorized spiral enteroscopy (MSE) is a novel advance in small bowel examination that is characterized as fast with a deep insertion. The aim of this study was to elucidate the effectiveness and safety of MSE. METHODS: Relevant articles that were published before November 1, 2022 were identified by searching PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and the Web of Science. The technical success rate (TSR), total (pan)-enteroscopy rate (TER), depth of maximum insertion (DMI), diagnostic yield, and adverse events were extracted and analyzed. Forest plots were graphed based on random effects models. RESULTS: A total of 876 patients from 8 studies were eligible for analysis. The pooled results of the TSR were 95.0% [95% confidence interval (CI) 91.0-98.0%, I2 = 78%, p < 0.01] and the pooled outcome of the TER was 43.1% (95% CI 24.7-62.5%, I2 = 95%, p < 0.01). The pooled results of the diagnostic and therapeutic yields were 77.2% (95% CI 69.0-84.5%, I2 = 84%, p < 0.01) and 49.0% (95% CI 38.0-60.1%, I2 = 89%, p < 0.01), respectively. The pooled estimates of adverse and severe adverse events were 17.2% (95% CI 11.9-23.2%, I2 = 75%, p < 0.01) and 0.7% (95% CI 0.0-2.1%, I2 = 37%, p = 0.13), respectively. CONCLUSION: MSE is a novel alternative approach for small bowel examination that can achieve high TER and diagnostic and therapeutic yields, and relatively low rates of severe adverse events. Head-to-head studies comparing MSE and other device-assisted enteroscopies are warranted.

Performance of Balloon-Assisted Enteroscopy for Non-ERCP Indications in Patients with Surgically Altered Gastrointestinal Anatomy.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Surgically altered gastrointestinal (GI) tract anatomy hinders deep enteroscopy. While enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) in patients with altered GI anatomy has been heavily investigated, the role of non-ERCP balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) has yet to be fully elucidated.Please check and confirm the author names and initials are correct. Also, kindly confirm the details in the metadata are correct.I have checked all you asked and have no correction.  Thank you. METHODS: A multicenter retrospective study of non-ERCP BAEs in patients with surgically altered GI tract anatomy at two tertiary academic hospitals was performed from January 2006 to December 2020. Altered GI tract anatomy was defined by surgical reconstruction affecting the length, angle, or overall trajectory of the endoscope during the intended approach. The main outcome measurements included technical success rate, diagnostic and therapeutic yields, and complication rate.Please check the edit made in the title of the article and correct if necessary.No more correction. Thank you. RESULTS: A total of 68 patients with surgically altered GI tract anatomy underwent 56 antegrade and 24 retrograde non-ERCP BAE procedures. The technical success rate was 86.2% in both, including 83.9% via antegrade approach and 91.7% via retrograde approach. Antegrade approach in Roux-en-Y anatomy was associated with the lowest success rate of 77.8%, whereas retrograde approach in patients with colon resection resulted in the highest rate of 100%. The diagnostic and therapeutic yields of non-ERCP BAE were 79.4% and 82.9%, respectively. The diagnostic yields varied according to the procedural indications. The major complication was luminal perforation in one case (1.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Non-ERCP BAE is effective and safe via both antegrade and retrograde approaches with a high technical success rate and diagnostic and therapeutic yields in patients with surgically altered GI tract anatomy.

Factors That Influence the Speed and Completion of Double Balloon Enteroscopy in Patients with Arteriovenous Malformations.

BACKGROUND: Double balloon enteroscopy remains a resource and time-intensive procedure that is not available in many endoscopy units. AIMS: We aimed to identify variables impacting the speed and completion of double balloon enteroscopy. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 550 patients. Using a mean time and distance for both the antegrade and retrograde approach, we determined the procedure speed and assessed factors that influenced it. In addition, we assessed the factors that contributed to a complete double balloon enteroscopy. RESULTS: A total of 386 antegrade and 164 retrograde double balloon enteroscopies were performed. Greater than 10 AVMs requiring treatment was a negative predictor (AOR 0.25, CI 0.11-0.51, p < 0.001), whereas age greater than 60 years (AOR 2.66, CI 1.18-6.65, p = 0.025) was a positive predictor of a fast antegrade enteroscopy. For retrograde, prior abdominal surgery was the only factor that trended to significance (AOR 0.38, CI 0.14-0.99, p = 0.052). A total of 120 combined procedures were performed. Female gender (AOR 2.62, CI 1.16-6.24, p = 0.02), history of prior abdominal surgery (AOR 0.31, CI 0.13-0.70, p = 0.006) and Boston bowel pre-preparation score of greater than 6 (AOR 4.50, CI 1.59-14.30, p = 0.006) were the only significant predictors of a complete procedure. CONCLUSION: By applying double balloon enteroscopy speed, a novel method of measuring procedure efficiency, we were able to more reliably identify the factors that will negatively impact the speed and success of the procedure.

Primary small bowel follicular lymphoma: the role of balloon-assisted enteroscopy in diagnosis and follow-up.

An asymptomatic 38-year-old male with no significant previous medical history performed routine laboratory studies that revealed iron-deficiency anemia. Esophagogastroduodenoscopy and colonoscopy were unremarkable and he undergone videocapsule endoscopy that revealed multiple small polyps along jejunum and ileum. Double-balloon enteroscopy confirmed the presence of scattered small whitish nodules and small polyps carpeting segments of jejunal mucosal and sometimes forming conglomerates with a nodular appearance. Histopathological examination showed lamina propria expansion by neoplastic follicles, predominantly composed by small lymphoid cells that, by immunohistochemistry, showed expression of CD20, CD10 and bcl-2. Computed tomography scan of abdomen and pelvis did not reveal systemic involvement, consistent with primary small bowel follicular lymphoma. Chemotherapy was started and, at reevaluation enteroscopy, although nodular jejunal segments persisted, biopsies did not show involvement by lymphoproliferative disease, which was interpreted as complete remission. Periodic clinical and biochemical evaluation and annual enteroscopic surveillance was maintained and, after three years, local recurrence of low-grade follicular lymphoma was detected. As previously, there was no evidence of systemic involvement and the decision was to maintain close surveillance. After one year, the patient remains asymptomatic and without evidence of disease progression. This case illustrates the essential role of balloon-assisted enteroscopy for diagnosis and surveillance of primary small bowel follicular lymphoma.

An Unusual Small Bowel Phytobezoar Successfully Resolved by Double-balloon Enteroscopy.

We herein report a very unusual case of small bowel obstruction caused by phytobezoar in a 69-year-old woman who consumed a large amount of bracken. The patient presented with nausea and vomiting. Computed tomography revealed an air-filled foreign body in the jejunum that had likely caused the small bowel obstruction. A fibrous foreign body diagnosed as a phytobezoar was detected using double-balloon enteroscopy. The obstruction was successfully resolved by crushing the phytobezoar repeatedly using a snare. Small bowel obstructions caused by phytobezoars are often treated with surgical interventions. However, endoscopic fragmentation using a snare is a minimally invasive treatment alternative.

Motorized Spiral Enteroscopy Is Effective in Patients with Prior Abdominal Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Motorized Spiral Enteroscopy (MSE) reduces procedure time and increases insertion depth into the small bowel; however, there is scarce evidence on factors affecting MSE efficacy. AIMS: To evaluate diagnostic yield and adverse events of MSE including patients with prior major abdominal surgery. METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted on patients undergoing MSE from June 2019 to December 2021. Demographic characteristics, procedure time, depth of maximum insertion (DMI), technical success, diagnostic yield, and adverse events were collected. RESULTS: Seventy-four anterograde (54.4%) and 62 retrograde (45.6%) enteroscopies were performed in 117 patients (64 males, median age 67 years). Fifty patients (42.7%) had prior major abdominal surgery. Technical success was 91.9% for anterograde and 90.3% for retrograde route. Diagnostic yield was 71.6% and 61.3%, respectively. The median DMI was 415 cm (264-585) for anterograde and 120 cm (37-225) for retrograde enteroscopy. In patients with prior major abdominal surgery, MSE showed significantly longer small bowel insertion time (38 vs 29 min, p = 0.004), with similar diagnostic yield (61 vs 71.4%, p = 0.201) and DMI (315 vs 204 cm, p = 0.226). The overall adverse event rate was 10.3% (SAE 1.5%), with no differences related to prior abdominal surgery (p = 0.598). Patients with prior surgeries directly involving the gastrointestinal tract showed lower DMI (189 vs 374 cm, p = 0.019) with equal exploration time (37.5 vs 38 min, p = 0.642) compared to those with other abdominal surgeries. CONCLUSIONS: MSE is effective and safe in patients with major abdominal surgery, although longer procedure times were observed. A lower depth of insertion was detected in patients with gastrointestinal surgery.

Effectiveness of double-balloon enteroscopy-assisted endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (DBE-ERCP): A multicenter real-world study.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: To investigate the effectiveness of double-balloon enteroscope-assisted retrograde cholangiopancreatography (DBE-ERCP) in patients with gastrointestinal surgically altered anatomy (SAA). METHODS: From May 2013 to October 2021, all consecutive patients undergoing DBE-ERCP in three gastroenterological referral centers in Northern Italy were enrolled in the study. Patients were assessed regarding their medical history, previous surgery, time from previous surgery to the DBE-ERCP procedure, and the success or failure of DBE-ERCP. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients (60% men, median age 65 (23-89) years) undergoing 67 DBE-ERCP procedures (1-3 DBE-ERCP per patient) were enrolled. Reasons for SAA included orthotopic liver transplantation (23%), ulcers (15%), malignancies (43%), difficult cholecystectomy (17%), and other causes (2%). Types of surgery included Roux-en-Y biliodigestive anastomosis (45%), Roux-en-Y gastrectomy (32%), pancreaticoduodenectomy (17%), and Billroth II gastrectomy (6%). The overall DBE-ERCP success rate was 86%. The type of surgery, indications, and the length of time between previous surgery and DBE-ERCP were not statistically associated with DBE-ERCP success. The DBE-ERCP success rate increased from 2018 to 2021. CONCLUSIONS: DBE-ERCP is a successful procedure in challenging patients with SAA. The improvement in results over time indicates the necessity of adequate training and of centralizing patients in referral centers.

Small bowel endoscopy for children: Collaboration of capsule endoscopy and device-assisted enteroscopy.

Capsule endoscopy (CE) and balloon-assisted enteroscopy (BAE) have become indispensable techniques for the diagnosis and management of small bowel disease in both adult and pediatric cases. However, relevant differences exist in the indications between these cohorts, with body weight and age having particular relevance in decisions for the latter. Both CE and BAE are designed for adult physique and they were not widely used among children. In addition, the types of small intestinal diseases differ between adults and children, and consequently, the indications also differ between them. This review focuses on the issues relevant to pediatric cases and describes the practical application of endoscopy in clinical practice. In conclusion, although there are age and weight restrictions, both CE and BAE are safe and useful devices for use in children, and their indications for use in children are likely to expand in the future.

Rhode Island gastroenterology video capsule endoscopy data set.

Complete endoscopic evaluation of the small bowel is challenging due to its length and anatomy. Although several advances have been made to achieve diagnostic and therapeutic goals, including double-balloon enteroscopy, single-balloon enteroscopy, and spiral enteroscopy, video capsule endoscopy (VCE) remains the least invasive tool for complete visualization of the small bowel and is the preferred method for initial diagnostic evaluation. At present, interpretation of VCE data requires manual annotation of landmarks and abnormalities in recorded videos, which can be time consuming. Computer-assisted diagnostic systems using artificial intelligence may help to optimize VCE reading efficiency by reducing the need for manual annotation. Here we present a large VCE data set compiled from studies performed at two United States hospitals in Providence, Rhode Island, including 424 VCE studies and 5,247,588 total labeled images. In conjunction with existing published data sets, these files may aid in the development of algorithms to further improve VCE.