[Judicialization of high priced medications in Argentina: quali-quantitative study]. / Judicialización de medicamentos de alto precio en Argentina: estudio cuali-cuantitativo.

INTRODUCTION: The economic consequences of mandatory coverage, through judicial means, of high-priced medications constitutes a growing problem, which merits knowing its local characteristics to provide possible solutions. OBJECTIVE: To identify medications, diseases involved, economic impact and contextual factors of the judicialization of high-priced medications in the Argentine Health System(MEP). METHODS: Quali-quantitative descriptive study that retrospectively analyzed legal protection resources by MEP from three national and provincial databases from January 2017 to December 2020, evaluating the existing relationship between lawsuits with regulatory approval, inclusion in benefit packages and relationship with journalistic articles for the three most frequently prosecuted drugs. RESULTS: 405 lawsuits were included, mainly from the Ministry of National Health. The three most prosecuted medications were nusinersen (21.7%), palbociclib (5.9%) and agalsidase-alfa (4.7%). Only 69.4% of medications were approved for marketing in Argentina at the time of the protection; 45.7% were incorporated into the Single Reimbursement System, and 16.8% had a report from the National Commission for the Evaluation of Health Technologies and Clinical Excellence (CONETEC), which was negative in 87.1% of cases. The average time from request to provision of the medication was 150 days. A temporal correlation was observed between the appearance of the MEP in the national graphic press and the appeals occurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Judicialization focused on very highpriced medications for rare or oncological diseases. The rulings were mostly in favor of the plaintiff, and access times to the medication took a long time. The mass media anticipated the judicial processes.

Introducción: Las consecuencias económicas de la cobertura obligatoria, vía judicial, de medicamentos de alto precio constituye un problema creciente, que amerita conocer sus características locales para aportar posibles soluciones. OBJETIVO: Identificar medicamentos, enfermedades, impacto económico y factores contextuales de la judicialización de medicamentos de alto precio (MEP) Argentina. Métodos: Estudio descriptivo cuali-cuantitativo que analizó retrospectivamente recursos de amparos legales por MEP de tres bases de datos nacionales y provinciales durante 4 años, evaluando relación existente entre amparos con aprobación regulatoria, inclusión de los MEP al paquete de beneficios y relación con notas periodísticas. RESULTADOS: Se incluyeron 405 amparos provenientes principalmente del Ministerio de Salud Nacional. Los tres medicamentos más judicializados fueron nusinersen (21.7%), palbociclib (5.9%) y agalsidasa-alfa (4.7%). Solo el 69.4% de los medicamentos se encontraban aprobados para la comercialización en Argentina al momento del amparo; el 45.7% se encontraban incorporados al Sistema Único de Reintegros y el 16.8% contaban con informe de la Comisión Nacional de Evaluación de Tecnologías Sanitarias y Excelencia Clínica (CONETEC), negativa en el 87.1% de casos. El tiempo promedio desde la solicitud hasta la provisión del medicamento fue de 150 días. Se observó una correlación temporal entre la aparición del MEP en la prensa nacional gráfica y la presentación de amparos de dicho MEP. CONCLUSIONES: La judicialización se concentró en medicamentos de altísimo precio para enfermedades poco frecuentes u oncológicas. Los fallos fueron mayoritariamente a favor del demandante, siendo los tiempos de acceso al medicamento prolongados. Los medios de comunicación anticiparon los procesos judiciales.

Recomendação nº 025, de 09 de setembro de 2021: recomenda ao Senado Federal a rejeição do PL 2337, pelas razões abaixo expostas / Recommendation No. 025, of September 9, 2021: recommends to the Federal Senate the rejection of PL 2337, for the reasons explained below

Recomenda ad referendum do Pleno do Conselho Nacional de Saúde ao Exmo Sr. Presidente do Senado Federal, às lideranças partidárias do Senado Federal e aos senadores a rejeição do PL 2337, especialmente dos dispositivos cujas alterações relativas ao PIS/COFINS aumentam a carga de tributos do setor saúde, uma vez que esse PL retirou os benefícios tributários sobre medicamentos e insumos, o que ampliará os custos da cadeia produtiva desse setor e reduzirá o acesso às ações e serviços essenciais à saúde da população brasileira.

International Experience in Therapeutic Value and Value-Based Pricing: A Rapid Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize at a global level the concept of therapeutic value (TV) and describe the experience of value-based pricing (VBP) policies in 6 reference countries. METHODS: We conducted a rapid review of the literature that addressed 2 exploratory research questions. A systematic and exhaustive search was carried out up to July 2018 in MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. RESULTS: The concepts of TV and VBP are related; value frameworks for medicines should include social preferences, comparative effectiveness, safety, adoption viability, social impact, high quality of evidence, severity of illness, and innovation. The added therapeutic value (ATV) is the manner of measuring the therapeutic advantages of new medicines compared with existing ones in terms of comparative effectiveness and safety. There are variations in the mechanisms of reimbursement and drug pricing regulation between the countries of study. CONCLUSION: In a VBP system it is essential to establish the TV and ATV of a new medicine. Although there are no methodological guidelines for the implementation of VBP policies, the process implies from the beginning the definition of TV categories that will be included in the drug pricing and reimbursement systems. Agreements between the pharmaceutical industry and governments have become a useful tool as a negotiating mechanism in most countries.

Evaluating the centralized purchasing policy for the treatment of hepatitis C: The Colombian CASE.

The high cost of drugs for hepatitis C limits access and adherence to treatment. In 2017, the Colombian health care system decided to design a strategy. It consisted of centralized purchasing, regulations, clinical practice guidelines, and direct observation of the treatment and follow-up of patients. The main objective of this study was to assess the centralized purchasing strategy in Colombia. The study design was a policy implementation assessment. We analyzed the change in prices, the clinical outcomes, and the opinions of stakeholders using data from the Ministry of Health. Additional information about effectiveness came from the Colombian Fund for High-Cost Diseases and semi-structured interviews of the stakeholders. The follow-up was from October, 2017 to October, 2018. The total number of patients reported in the cohort period was 1069. The number that finished 12 weeks of treatment, completed the follow-up for the case closure, and were considered cured through the end of October, 2018 was 563 (53%). The remainder, 506 patients (47%), are currently in treatment. A total of 543 of these treated patients (96%) were cured. After implementing this strategy, the drug prices decreased by more than 90% overall. Before implementation, the total direct cost was $100 102 171.75 dollars. Afterward, the cost was $8 378 747 dollars.

Challenges in the Regulation of High-Cost Treatments: An Overview From Brazil.

Regulation of drug prices that ensures adequate access to effective treatments and promotes innovation is a global challenge. In the United States, the government does not regulate drug prices when they come onto market. On the other hand, in countries such as France and Brazil, government agencies are responsible for setting up price limits by leveraging the interests of the companies and the countries' population. In Brazil, safety and efficacy of drugs are regulated by the Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency, and drug prices are regulated by the Pharmaceutical Market Regulation Chamber with a participation of Brazilian Health Regulatory Agency. Here, we introduce the current challenges faced by the Brazilian government in the drug price regulation and present proposed initiatives aiming to streamline access to innovative treatments for its citizens.

Drug prices and trends before and after requesting compulsory licenses: the Ecuadorian experience.

Introduction: The Ecuadorian Institute of Intellectual Property (IEPI) granted several compulsory licenses between 2011 and 2017. In 2009, the President of Ecuador signed a decree that was intended to facilitate the request of compulsory licenses (CL) in the country, not only for Enfarma EP but for any privately owned local company in order to produce more accessible medicines. Areas covered: The national and international regulatory framework of pharmaceutical patents and the local applicability of CL in Ecuador. The authors also analyzed the results of requesting unplanned and epidemiologically unnecessary CL at a national level. Finally, the authors reviewed the effects of requesting, granting or denying CL on price per unit in the last 7 years of available data. Expert opinion: The authors think that compulsory licenses are useful tools when negotiating drug prices or when the demand cannot be satisfied due to economic constrain within the local health system. However, the authors' experience suggests that Ecuador did not have an established and reliable production system neither an adequate plan before requesting CL, therefore the positive effects of this measure were not clearly established.

Initiatives to challenge patent barriers and their relationship with the price of medicines procured by the Brazilian Unified National Health System. / Iniciativas de enfrentamento da barreira patentária e a relação com o preço de medicamentos adquiridos pelo Sistema Único de Saúde.

Since 1996, when antiretroviral (ARV) treatments started being guaranteed to people living with HIV in Brazil, the government has faced the challenge of ensuring sustainability of this policy within a context of incorporating patented medicines. This article sought to analyze the historical series of the price of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in Brazil and in the international market also considering the initiatives to challenge patent barriers between 2001 and 2012. The methods used were mapping initiatives to challenge LPV/r patent barriers and the analysis of historical series of its price in Brazil and in the international market. Results show that, between 2001 and 2003, there were efforts to use compulsory licensing as a threat. From 2005 to 2007, initiatives by different satkeholders were identified: declaration of public interest, pre-grant opposition ("support to examination") and civil action. From 2006 to 2008, compulsory licensing initiatives in other countries resulted in a price reduction in Brazil. Between 2009 and 2012, there was a 30% reduction in the Brazilian purchasing price.

Iniciativas de enfrentamento da barreira patentária e a relação com o preço de medicamentos adquiridos pelo Sistema Único de Saúde / Iniciativas para enfrentarse a la barrera patentaria y su relación con el precio de medicamentos adquiridos por el Sistema Único de Salud / Initiatives to challenge patent barriers and their relationship with the price of medicines procured by the Brazilian Unified National Health System

Resumo: Desde 1996, com a consolidação da oferta do tratamento antirretroviral (ARV) às pessoas vivendo com HIV no Brasil, o governo tem como desafio assegurar a sustentabilidade desta oferta num contexto de incorporação de medicamentos patenteados. O artigo teve como objetivo analisar a série histórica do preço do lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) no Brasil e no mercado internacional à luz de iniciativas de enfrentamento da barreira patentária no período de 2001 a 2012. A metodologia consistiu em mapeamento de iniciativas de enfrentamento da barreira patentária para o LPV/r e análise da série histórica do preço no Brasil e no mercado internacional. Os resultados encontrados apontam que, entre 2001 e 2003, identificaram-se esforços de ameaça de licença compulsória. De 2005 a 2007, identificaram-se iniciativas por diferentes atores: declaração de interesse público, subsídios ao exame e ação civil pública. De 2006 e 2008, iniciativas internacionais de licença compulsória resultaram na redução do preço no Brasil. Entre 2009 e 2012, observa-se uma redução do preço de aquisição pelo Brasil de 30%.

Resumen: Desde 1996, con la consolidación de la oferta de tratamiento antirretroviral (ARV) para las personas viviendo con VIH, el Gobierno de Brasil tiene el desafío de asegurar la sostenibilidad de dicha oferta en un contexto de incorporación de medicamentos patentados. El objetivo de este artículo es analizar la serie histórica del precio del lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) en Brasil y en el mercado internacional, a la luz de iniciativas para enfrentar la barrera patentaria durante el período de 2001 a 2012. La metodología consistió en un mapeo de iniciativas para hacer frente a la barrera patentaria del LPV/r y el análisis de la serie histórica de sus precios de adquisición por el SUS y en el mercado internacional. Entre 2001 y 2003 se identificaron esfuerzos por obtener reducciones de precio de LPV/r, mediante la amenaza de expedición de licencia obligatoria. De 2005 a 2007, se identificaron varias iniciativas de diferentes actores, tales como, la expedición de declaración de interés público, preseentación de subsidios para el examen de solicitudes de patente de este medicamento y la interpesición de acción civil pública. Entre 2006 y 2008, la expedición de licencias obligatorias en el marco de iniciativas internacionales, propiciaron reducciones de precio de LPV/r en Brasil. La reducción promedio del precio de adquisición por parte SUS fue de 30% entre 2009 y 2012.

Abstract: Since 1996, when antiretroviral (ARV) treatments started being guaranteed to people living with HIV in Brazil, the government has faced the challenge of ensuring sustainability of this policy within a context of incorporating patented medicines. This article sought to analyze the historical series of the price of lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r) in Brazil and in the international market also considering the initiatives to challenge patent barriers between 2001 and 2012. The methods used were mapping initiatives to challenge LPV/r patent barriers and the analysis of historical series of its price in Brazil and in the international market. Results show that, between 2001 and 2003, there were efforts to use compulsory licensing as a threat. From 2005 to 2007, initiatives by different satkeholders were identified: declaration of public interest, pre-grant opposition ("support to examination") and civil action. From 2006 to 2008, compulsory licensing initiatives in other countries resulted in a price reduction in Brazil. Between 2009 and 2012, there was a 30% reduction in the Brazilian purchasing price.

Antiretroviral purchasing and prescription practices in Mexico: constraints, challenges and opportunities.

OBJECTIVE: This study examines the antiretroviral (ARV) market characteristics for drugs procured and prescribed to Mexico's Social Protection System in Health beneficiaries between 2008 and 2013, and compares them with international data. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Procurement information from the National Center for the Prevention and the Control of HIV/AIDS was analyzed to estimate volumes and prices of key ARV. Annual costs were compared with data from the World Health Organization's Global Price Reporting Mechanism for similar countries. Finally, regimens reported in the ARV Drug Management, Logistics and Surveillance System database were reviewed to identify prescription trends and model ARV expenditures until 2018. RESULTS: Results show that the first-line ARV market is concentrated among a small number of patented treatments, in which prescription is clinically adequate, but which prices are higher than those paid by similar countries. The current set of legal and structural options available to policy makers to bring prices down is extremely limited. CONCLUSIONS: Different negotiation policies were not successful to decrease ARV high prices in the public health market. The closed list approach had a good impact on prescription quality but was ineffective in reducing prices. The Coordinating Commission for Negotiating the Price of Medicines and other Health Supplies also failed to obtain adequate prices. To maximize purchase efficiency, policy makers should focus on finding long-term legal and political safeguards to counter the high prices imposed by pharmaceutical companies.

Development of a metrics dashboard for monitoring involvement in the 340B Drug Pricing Program.

PURPOSE: An electronic tool to support hospital organizations in monitoring and addressing financial and compliance challenges related to participation in the 340B Drug Pricing Program is described. SUMMARY: In recent years there has been heightened congressional and regulatory scrutiny of the federal 340B program, which provides discounted drug prices on Medicaid-covered drugs to safety net hospitals and other 340B-eligible healthcare organizations, or "covered entities." Historically, the 340B program has lacked a metrics-driven reporting framework to help covered entities capture the value of 340B program involvement, community benefits provided to underserved populations, and costs associated with compliance with 340B eligibility requirements. As part of an initiative by a large health system to optimize its 340B program utilization and regulatory compliance efforts, a team of pharmacists led the development of an electronic dashboard tool to help monitor 340B program activities at the system's 340B-eligible facilities. After soliciting input from an array of internal and external 340B program stakeholders, the team designed the dashboard and associated data-entry tools to facilitate the capture and analysis of 340B program-related data in four domains: cost savings and revenue, program maintenance costs, community benefits, and compliance. CONCLUSION: A large health system enhanced its ability to evaluate and monitor 340B program-related activities through the use of a dashboard tool capturing key metrics on cost savings achieved, maintenance costs, and other aspects of program involvement.

Problems in the regulatory policy of the drug market.

OBJECTIVE: Analyze the implementation of drug price regulation policy by the Drug Market Regulation Chamber. METHODS: This is an interview-based study, which was undertaken in 2012, using semi-structured questionnaires with social actors from the pharmaceutical market, the pharmaceuticals industry, consumers and the regulatory agency. In addition, drug prices were compiled based on surveys conducted in the state of Sao Paulo, at the point of sale, between February 2009 and May 2012. RESULTS: The mean drug prices charged at the point of sale (pharmacies) were well below the maximum price to the consumer, compared with many drugs sold in Brazil. Between 2009 and 2012, 44 of the 129 prices, corresponding to 99 drugs listed in the database of compiled prices, showed a variation of more than 20.0% in the mean prices at the point of sale and the maximum price to the consumer. In addition, many laboratories have refused to apply the price adequacy coefficient in their sales to government agencies. CONCLUSIONS: The regulation implemented by the pharmaceutical market regulator was unable to significantly control prices of marketed drugs, without succeeding to push them to levels lower than those determined by the pharmaceutical industry and failing, therefore, in its objective to promote pharmaceutical support for the public. It is necessary reconstruct the regulatory law to allow market prices to be reduced by the regulator as well as institutional strengthen this government body.

Problems in the regulatory policy of the drug market / Problemas na política regulatória do mercado de medicamentos

OBJECTIVE Analyze the implementation of drug price regulation policy by the Drug Market Regulation Chamber.METHODS This is an interview-based study, which was undertaken in 2012, using semi-structured questionnaires with social actors from the pharmaceutical market, the pharmaceuticals industry, consumers and the regulatory agency. In addition, drug prices were compiled based on surveys conducted in the state of Sao Paulo, at the point of sale, between February 2009 and May 2012.RESULTS The mean drug prices charged at the point of sale (pharmacies) were well below the maximum price to the consumer, compared with many drugs sold in Brazil. Between 2009 and 2012, 44 of the 129 prices, corresponding to 99 drugs listed in the database of compiled prices, showed a variation of more than 20.0% in the mean prices at the point of sale and the maximum price to the consumer. In addition, many laboratories have refused to apply the price adequacy coefficient in their sales to government agencies.CONCLUSIONS The regulation implemented by the pharmaceutical market regulator was unable to significantly control prices of marketed drugs, without succeeding to push them to levels lower than those determined by the pharmaceutical industry and failing, therefore, in its objective to promote pharmaceutical support for the public. It is necessary reconstruct the regulatory law to allow market prices to be reduced by the regulator as well as institutional strengthen this government body.

OBJETIVO Analisar a implementação da política de regulação de preços de medicamentos pela Câmara de Regulação do Mercado de Medicamentos.MÉTODOS Estudo baseado na realização de entrevistas, em 2012, usando questionários semiestruturados, com atores sociais do mercado de medicamentos, representantes da indústria farmacêutica, de consumidores e do órgão regulador. Foram também compilados preços de medicamentos obtidos em pesquisas realizadas no Estado de São Paulo, nos pontos de venda, entre fevereiro de 2009 e maio de 2012.RESULTADOS As médias dos preços de medicamentos praticadas nos pontos de venda (farmácias e drogarias) estiveram muito abaixo do preço máximo ao consumidor, em relação à grande parte dos medicamentos comercializados no Brasil. Entre 2009 e 2012, 44 dos 129 preços praticados, correspondentes a 99 medicamentos constantes do banco de preços compilados, apresentaram variação superior a 20,0% entre a média de preços praticados nos pontos de venda e o preço máximo ao consumidor. Ademais, muitos laboratórios se recusaram a aplicar o coeficiente de adequação de preços nas vendas a órgãos públicos.CONCLUSÕES A regulação implementada pelo órgão regulador do mercado de medicamentos foi incapaz de controlar os preços de quantidade significativa dos medicamentos comercializados, pressionando-os a patamares inferiores àqueles determinados pela indústria farmacêutica e falhando, portanto, no seu objetivo de promover assistência farmacêutica. É necessária reforma da lei regulamentadora para permitir a redução de preços praticados no mercado pelo órgão regulador, bem como fortalecimento institucional desse órgão.

Antiretroviral purchasing and prescription practices in Mexico: constraints, challenges and opportunities / Compras y prescripciones de medicamentos antirretrovirales en México: restricciones, retos y oportunidades

Objective. This study examines the antiretroviral (ARV) market characteristics for drugs procured and prescribed to Mexico's Social Protection System in Health beneficiaries between 2008 and 2013, and compares them with international data. Materials and methods. Procurement information from the National Center for the Prevention and the Control of HIV/AIDS was analyzed to estimate volumes and prices of key ARV. Annual costs were compared with data from the World Health Organization's Global Price Reporting Mechanism for similar countries. Finally, regimens reported in the ARV Drug Management, Logistics and Surveillance System database were reviewed to identify prescription trends and model ARV expenditures until 2018. Results. Results show that the first-line ARV market is concentrated among a small number of patented treatments, in which prescription is clinically adequate, but which prices are higher than those paid by similar countries. The current set of legal and structural options available to policy makers to bring prices down is extremely limited. Conclusions. Different negotiation policies were not successful to decrease ARV high prices in the public health market. The closed list approach had a good impact on prescription quality but was ineffective in reducing prices. The Coordinating Commission for Negotiating the Price of Medicines and other Health Supplies also failed to obtain adequate prices. To maximize purchase efficiency, policy makers should focus on finding long-term legal and political safeguards to counter the high prices imposed by pharmaceutical companies.

Objetivo. Este estudio analiza el mercado de los medicamentos antiretrovirales (ARV) adquiridos y prescritos a los beneficiarios del Seguro Popular entre 2008 y 2013, en México, comparándolo con información internacional. Material y métodos. Se analiza información sobre la compra de medicamentos por parte del Centro para la Prevención y el Control del VIH y el Sida (Censida) para estimar precios y volúmenes de compra de los principales ARV. Los costos anuales de tratamiento estimados fueron comparados con información del Global Price Reporting Mechanism (GPRM) de la Organización Mundial de la Salud, para países similares. Finalmente se revisaron los esquemas reportados en el Sistema de Administración, Logística y Vigilancia de ARV para identificar tendencias y proyectar el gasto en ARV hasta 2018. Resultados. El mercado mexicano de ARV está concentrado en pocos esquemas de primera línea y, aunque la prescripción es clínicamente adecuada, los precios son más altos que en otros países similares. El conjunto actual de opciones legales y estructurales disponibles para los formuladores de políticas para reducir los precios es muy limitado. Conclusiones. Las políticas de negociación han sido poco exitosas para disminuir los precios de los ARV en México. La Coordinating Commission for Negotiating the Price of Medicines and other Health Supplies y la integración de las guías de tratamiento han tenido impacto significativo en la calidad de la prescripción, pero moderado en la reducción de precios. Por ello es necesario buscar garantías jurídicas y políticas a largo plazo para hacer frente a los altos precios de los ARV.

The evolution of Reference Drug Lists and Clinical Practice Guidelines in the public health system of a middle-income country.

AIMS: The aims were to analyze the dynamics of the medicines formulary in a middle-income country and to analyze the concordance of the included medicines with the national Clinical Practices Guidelines (CPG). METHODS: Medicines and their indications of use included in the Mexican Reference Drug List (Mex-RDL) from 1996 to 2013 were analyzed. The top 10 indications with the highest number of medicines in 2013 were analyzed retrospectively until 1996 in order to identify the increase in the number of medicines to treat each one, as well as the progressive specificity of the indication according to the International statistical Classification of Diseases (ICD-10). The concordance between the CPG and medicines approved for the top 10 indications was studied. RESULTS: The number of medicines included in the Mex-RDL kept constantly growing from 454 drugs in 1996 to 811 in 2013. Up to 26.3% of these medicines were approved to treat only 10 indications (1.5% of all possible indications of use). Many of these new medicines had been approved for more and more specific indications, while the oldest ones had been approved for general indications. Up to 27.6% of the medicines approved for these top 10 indications do not appear in the updated recommendations of the specific CPG for those indications. CONCLUSIONS: During the last 18 years, the new medicines and indications included in the Mex-RDL were redundant and concentrated into few similar clinical conditions. This is a factor that promotes an irrational use of these medicines and, thus, unnecessarily raises the price of health care, undermines the quality of the health system and probably increases the uncertainty of treatments.

Antiretroviral drug expenditure, pricing and judicial demand: an analysis of federal procurement data in Brazil from 2004-2011.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have described expenditures for antiretroviral (ARV) medicines in Brazil through 2005. While prior studies examined overall expenditures, they have not have analyzed drug procurement data in order to describe the role of court litigation on access and pricing. METHODS: ARV drug procurement from private sector sources for the years 2004-2011 was obtained through the general procurement database of the Brazilian Federal Government (SIASG). Procurement was measured in Defined Daily Doses (DDD) per 1000 persons-under-treatment per day. Expenditures and price per DDD were calculated and expressed in U.S. Dollars. Justifications for ARV purchases were examined in order to determine the relationship between health litigation and incorporation into Brazil's national treatment guidelines. RESULTS: Drug procurement of ARVs from private sources underwent marked expansion in 2005, peaked in 2009, and stabilized to 2008 levels by 2011. Expenditures followed procurement curves. Medications which were procured for the first time after 2007 cost more than medicines which were introduced before 2007. Judicial actions initially resulted in purchases of newer medications for a select number of patients in Brazil but ultimately expanded availability to a larger population through incorporation into the national treatment guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: Drug procurement and expenditures for ARVs in Brazil varied between 2004-2011. The procurement of some drugs from the private sector ceased after public manufacturers started producing them locally. Judicial demand has resulted in the incorporation of newer drugs into the national treatment guidelines. In order for the AIDS treatment program to remain sustainable, efforts should be pursued to reduce prices through generic drugs, price negotiation and other public health flexibilities such as compulsory licensing.

[Consequences of the judicialization of health policies: the cost of medicines for mucopolysaccharidosis]. / Consequências da judicialização das políticas de saúde: custos de medicamentos para as mucopolissacaridoses.

This study analyzes expenditures backed by court rulings to ensure the public provision of medicines for treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS), a rare disease that requires high-cost drugs not covered by the Brazilian government's policy for pharmaceutical care and which have disputed clinical efficacy. The methodology included a review of files from 196 court rulings ordering the Brazilian Ministry of Health to provide the medicines, in addition to Ministry of Health administrative records. According to the analysis, the "judicialization" of the health system subjected the Brazilian government to a monopoly in the distribution of medicines and consequently the loss of its capacity to manage drug purchases. The study also indicates that the imposition of immediate, individualized purchases prevents obtaining economies of scale with planned procurement of larger amounts of the medication, besides causing logistic difficulties in controlling the amounts consumed and stored. In conclusion, litigation results from the lack of a clear policy in the health system for rare diseases in general, thereby leading to excessive expenditures for MPS treatment.

Consequências da judicialização das políticas de saúde: custos de medicamentos para as mucopolissacaridoses / Consequences of the judicialization of health policies: the cost of medicines for mucopolysaccharidosis

O estudo analisa os gastos da judicialização de medicamentos para a mucopolissacaridose (MPS), uma doença rara, de alto custo, fora da política de assistência farmacêutica e com benefício clínico. O levantamento de dados foi realizado nos arquivos de 196 dossiês que determinou que o Ministério da Saúde fornecesse medicamentos no período entre 2006 e 2010, e nos registros administrativos e contábeis do Ministério da Saúde. A análise identifica sujeição do governo brasileiro a monopólios de distribuição de medicamentos e, consequentemente, perda de sua capacidade de administrar compras. Também identifica que a imposição da aquisição imediata e individualizada impede a obtenção de economias de escala com a compra planejada de maiores quantidades de medicamento, e impõe dificuldades logísticas para o controle das quantidades consumidas e estocadas. Conclui-se que a judicialização decorre da ausência de uma política clara do sistema de saúde para doenças raras em geral, e tem como consequência gastos acima do necessário para o tratamento.

This study analyzes expenditures backed by court rulings to ensure the public provision of medicines for treatment of mucopolysaccharidosis (MPS), a rare disease that requires high-cost drugs not covered by the Brazilian government's policy for pharmaceutical care and which have disputed clinical efficacy. The methodology included a review of files from 196 court rulings ordering the Brazilian Ministry of Health to provide the medicines, in addition to Ministry of Health administrative records. According to the analysis, the "judicialization" of the health system subjected the Brazilian government to a monopoly in the distribution of medicines and consequently the loss of its capacity to manage drug purchases. The study also indicates that the imposition of immediate, individualized purchases prevents obtaining economies of scale with planned procurement of larger amounts of the medication, besides causing logistic difficulties in controlling the amounts consumed and stored. In conclusion, litigation results from the lack of a clear policy in the health system for rare diseases in general, thereby leading to excessive expenditures for MPS treatment.

[Costly drugs: analysis and proposals for the Mercosur countries]. / Medicamentos de alto costo: análisis y propuestas para los países del Mercosur.

OBJECTIVE: Determine how the Mercosur countries access, regulate, and finance costly drugs and propose joint selection and financing strategies at the subregional level. METHODS: Qualitative design, using content analyses of primary and secondary sources, document reviews, interviews, focus groups, and case studies. The variables selected included: selection criteria, access, financing, and regulations in the various countries. Costly drugs were divided into those that do not alter the natural course of the disease and those with demonstrated efficacy, using the defined daily dose to compare the costs of classical treatments and those involving costly drugs. RESULTS: The Mercosur countries generally lack formal strategies for dealing with the demand for costly drugs, and governments and insurers wind up financing them by court order. The case studies show that there are costly drugs whose efficacy has not been established but that nonetheless generate demand. The fragmentation of procurement, international commitments with regard to intellectual property, and low negotiating power exponentially increase the price of costly drugs, putting health system finances in jeopardy. CONCLUSIONS: Costly drugs must be regulated and rationally selected so that only those that substantively benefit people are accepted. To finance the drugs so selected, common country strategies are needed that include such options as flexible in trade agreements, the creation of national resource funds, or joint procurement by countries to enhance their negotiating power.