Gastric Alimetry® Testing and Healthcare Economic Analysis in Nausea and Vomiting Syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Chronic nausea and vomiting syndromes (CNVS), gastroparesis and functional dyspepsia (FD) are complex disorders. Body Surface Gastric Mapping (BSGM), a new test of gastric function, using Gastric Alimetry® (Alimetry, New Zealand) may be useful for de-escalating healthcare utilisation. This study aimed to define healthcare costs and estimate health economic impacts of implementing this test in patients with chronic gastroduodenal symptoms. METHODS: Consecutive patients at a tertiary referral centre evaluated with Gastric Alimetry were included. Frequency and cost data relating to medical investigations, hospital and outpatient presentations were evaluated. Costs of healthcare utilisation were calculated, and the potential cost savings of implementing Gastric Alimetry within a diagnostic decision-tree model were estimated. RESULTS: Overall, 31 consecutive patients (mean age 36.1 years; 83.9% female; predominant symptoms: nausea [83.9%], pain [61.3%], vomiting [67.7%] and bloating [35.5%]) completed Gastric Alimetry testing. Repeat gastroscopy and abdominal CT rates were 29% (8/28) and 85% (11/13), respectively. Gastric Alimetry testing identified spectral abnormalities in 45.2% of patients, and symptom profiling classified a further 29.1% of patients. Median annualised cost difference after test introduction was NZ$-12,032. Estimated reductions in investigation-related costs when incorporating Gastric Alimetry into the diagnostic workflow model were approximately NZ$1,300 per patient. CONCLUSIONS: Healthcare utilisation and confirmatory testing rates remain high in nausea and vomiting syndromes. This study presents real-world data, together with a decision-tree analysis, showing Gastric Alimetry can streamline clinical care pathways, resulting in reduced healthcare utilisation and cost.

Helicobacter pylori "Test-and-Treat" strategy with urea breath test: A cost-effective strategy for the management of dyspepsia and the prevention of ulcer and gastric cancer in Spain-Results of the Hp-Breath initiative.

BACKGROUND: Data from clinical trials comparing Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) management strategies in patients with dyspepsia are limited. Cost-effectiveness simulation models might help to identify the optimal strategy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of the H. pylori "Test and Treat" (T&T) strategy including the use of urea breath test (UBT) vs symptomatic treatment (ST) and vs upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) as a first procedure in patients with dyspepsia. METHODS: Three main strategies: "T&T" strategy including the use of UBT, "UGE" and "ST" have been compared using cost-effectiveness models developed in accordance with the Spanish medical practice. For the model simulations, a time horizon of 4 weeks was considered for the endpoint "Dyspepsia symptoms relief" and 10 years when using "Peptic ulcer avoided" and "Gastric cancer avoided" endpoints. RESULTS: For the endpoint "Dyspepsia symptoms relief", T&T strategy appears to be the most cost-effective (883€/success) compared to UGE strategy and to ST strategy (respectively 1628€ and 990€/success). For the endpoint "Probability of peptic ulcer", the T&T strategy appears to be the most cost-effective (421€/peptic ulcer avoided/y) compared to UGE strategy and ST strategy (respectively 728€ and 632€/peptic ulcer avoided/y). For the endpoint "Gastric cancer avoided", the T&T strategy appears to be the most cost-effective (524€/gastric cancer avoided/y) compared to UGE strategy and "ST" strategy (respectively 716€ and 696€/gastric cancer avoided/y). CONCLUSIONS: T&T strategy including the use of UBT is the most cost-effective medical approach for management of dyspepsia and for the prevention of ulcer and gastric cancer.

Electroacupuncture plus standard of care for managing refractory functional dyspepsia: protocol of a pragmatic trial with economic evaluation.

INTRODUCTION: This trial proposes to compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of electroacupuncture (EA) plus on-demand gastrocaine with waiting list for EA plus on-demand gastrocaine in providing symptom relief and quality-of-life improvement among patients with functional dyspepsia (FD). METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a single-centre, pragmatic, randomised parallel-group, superiority trial comparing the outcomes of (1) EA plus on-demand gastrocaine group and (2) waiting list to EA plus on-demand gastrocaine group. 132 (66/arm) endoscopically confirmed, Helicobacter pylori-negative patients with FD will be recruited. Enrolled patients will respectively be receiving (1) 20 sessions of EA over 10 weeks plus on-demand gastrocaine; or (2) on-demand gastrocaine and being nominated on to a waiting list for EA, which entitles them 20 sessions of EA over 10 weeks after 12 weeks of waiting. The primary outcome will be the between-group difference in proportion of patients achieving adequate relief of symptoms over 12 weeks. The secondary outcomes will include patient-reported change in global symptoms and individual symptoms, Nepean Dyspepsia Index, Nutrient Drink Test, 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9), and 7-item Generalised Anxiety Disorder Scale (GAD7). Adverse events will be assessed formally. Results on direct medical costs and on the EuroQol (EQ-5D) questionnaire will also be used to assess cost-effectiveness. Analysis will follow the intention-to-treat principle using appropriate univariate and multivariate methods. A mixed model analysis taking into account missing data of these outcomes will be performed. Cost-effectiveness analysis will be performed using established approach. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study is supported by the Health and Medical Research Fund, Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of China. It has been approved by the Joint Chinese University of Hong Kong - New Territories East Cluster Clinical Research Ethics Committee. Results will be published in peer-reviewed journals and be disseminated in international conference. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR-IPC-15007109; Pre-result.

Clinical and epidemiological differences in functional dyspepsia between the East and the West.

BACKGROUND: Functional dyspepsia (FD) is a common condition, affecting adults in both Western (North America and Europe) and Eastern (Asian) parts of the globe. The prevalence has been reported to range from 5% to 40%, largely due to variation from definition criteria and geographical location. Recent published reports in Western and Eastern populations separately indicate that differences in the epidemiology and clinical patterns of FD may exist. Such differences will have implications for the clinical management of and healthcare strategizing for FD at the local level. PURPOSE: This review aims to examine the prevalence and clinical patterns of FD in specific groups, namely Western and Eastern populations, based on the Rome criteria. Further differences in the epidemiological associations of FD will be explored between population-based studies in both the East and the West. Finally, the socio-economic consequences of FD, an important measure of the impact of the disease, will be compared between the East and the West.

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori in dyspeptic patients at a tertiary hospital in a low resource setting.

BACKGROUND: More than half of the world's population is infected with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori), the primary cause of chronic gastritis. Chronic gastritis is associated with peptic ulcer and in advanced stages with an increased risk of developing gastric adenocarcinoma. In many developing countries access to upper gastrointestinal (UGI) endoscopy services is limited. As a result, many UGI diseases are treated empirically. OBJECTIVE: To determine the prevalence of H. pylori in patients presenting with dyspepsia, and the mean time from onset of symptoms to performing an endoscopy examination. METHODS: A cross sectional descriptive study conducted from 5th January to 30th April 2014. Adult patients with dyspepsia who were referred for UGI endoscopy were recruited consecutively. Questionnaires were used to collect data which were analyzed using STATA software. IRB approval was obtained. RESULTS: In total, 111 participants' data were analyzed. The F:M ratio was 1:1.4, mean age 43 years (SD = 16). The prevalence of H. pylori gastritis was 36%. The minimum time to endoscopy was 3 weeks, maximum 1,248 weeks and the mean time 57 weeks. CONCLUSION: The burden of H. pylori infection in patients with dyspepsia was high. Patients had prior empirical antibiotic therapy. Access to endoscopic services is limited.

Inpatient burden of childhood functional GI disorders in the USA: an analysis of national trends in the USA from 1997 to 2009.

BACKGROUND: Functional gastrointestinal disorders (FGIDs) are among the most common outpatient diagnoses in pediatric primary care and gastroenterology. There is limited data on the inpatient burden of childhood FGIDs in the USA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the inpatient admission rate, length of stay (LoS), and associated costs related to FGIDs from 1997 to 2009. METHODS: We analyzed the Kids' Inpatient Sample Database (KID) for all subjects in which constipation (ICD-9 codes: 564.0-564.09), abdominal pain (ICD-9 codes: 789.0-789.09), irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) (ICD-9 code: 564.1), abdominal migraine (ICD-9 code: 346.80 and 346.81) dyspepsia (ICD-9 code: 536.8), or fecal incontinence (ICD-codes: 787.6-787.63) was the primary discharge diagnosis from 1997 to 2009. The KID is the largest publicly available all-payer inpatient database in the USA, containing data from 2 to 3 million pediatric hospital stays yearly. KEY RESULTS: From 1997 to 2009, the number of discharges with a FGID primary diagnosis increased slightly from 6,348,537 to 6,393,803. The total mean cost per discharge increased significantly from $6115 to $18,058 despite the LoS remaining relatively stable. Constipation and abdominal pain were the most common FGID discharge diagnoses. Abdominal pain and abdominal migraine discharges were most frequent in the 10-14 year age group. Constipation and fecal incontinence discharges were most frequent in the 5-9 year age group. IBS discharge was most common for the 15-17 year age group. CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Hospitalizations and associated costs in childhood FGIDs have increased in number and cost in the USA from 1997 to 2009. Further studies to determine optimal methods to avoid unnecessary hospitalizations and potentially harmful diagnostic testing are indicated.

Incidence and psychological-behavioral characteristics of refractory functional dyspepsia: a large, multi-center, prospective investigation from China.

AIM: To explore the incidence and psychological and behavioral characteristics of refractory functional dyspepsia (RFD) in China. METHODS: The subjects of this study were 1341 new outpatients with functional dyspepsia (FD) who were diagnosed according to the Rome III criteria at four hospitals in Guangdong Province between June and September 2012, and 100 healthy volunteers. All subjects completed questionnaires and scales administered. RESULTS: Three-hundred and twenty-seven of the 1341 patients with FD had RFD (24.4%). Patients with RFD had a longer disease duration and a more severe form of the disease than patients with non-refractory FD (NRFD). The prevalence of depression and anxiety symptoms was higher in patients with RFD than in patients with NRFD. The prevalence of unhealthy eating behaviors, lack of physical activity, and sleeping disorders was higher in patients with RFD than in patients with NRFD. Patients with RFD sought medical advice on more occasions and spent more money on treatment than patients with NRFD. Finally, patients with RFD had poorer quality of life than patients with NRFD. CONCLUSION: RFD is not rare in clinical practice and should get attention by patients and doctors because of its long duration, severe symptoms, and associations with abnormal psychology and poor quality of life.

Yields of dual therapy containing high-dose proton pump inhibitor in eradication of H. pylori positive dyspeptic patients.

UNLABELLED: BACKGROUND/AIMs: H. pylori eradication has been recommended for dyspeptic patients in high prevalance regions. Triple therapies are still prescribed mostly because culture and antibiotic susceptibility tests aren't widely available in the world. Dual therapy with high-dose proton pump inhibitors reported to have higher eradication rates. Our objective was to determine eradication success and cost-effectivity of dual therapy in dyspeptic patients. METHODOLOGY: Patients were treated orally with either dual (n:74,omeprazole 20mg q.i.d and amoxicillin 1g b.i.d) or triple therapy (n:116,omeprazole 20mg b.i.d and amoxicillin 1g b.i.d and clarithromycin 500mg b.i.d) for 14 days. HpSA was requested 3 months later. The results were evaluated statistically, p values ˂0,05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Patients (n:190) were included the study((80 female,110 male, mean age: 35.6±11year(p<0.001)). Alcohol/smoking, endoscopic findings and H. pylori rates with pathological examinations were not significantly different between groups whereas there was a significant difference in HpFast tests(p<0.01). When examined with HpSA tests 3 months after the treatment, eradication rate was 81.1% in the dual therapy group versus 63.8% in the triple therapy group (p:0.011). Dual therapy was economic than triple therapy (144USDvs.107USD,p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Dual therapy seems more successful, cost-effective and is less risky in terms of side effects compared to standard triple therapy in patients with dyspepsia.

Health care burden of dyspepsia among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation patients.

BACKGROUND: Although dyspepsia is common among nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) patients, its impact on patient health and cost has not been adequately studied. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the incremental health care burden associated with dyspepsia among NVAF patients and its impact on warfarin treatment. METHODS: NVAF patients ≥ 18 years of age with continuous insurance coverage were identified (January 1, 2007, to December 31, 2009) from the MarketScan Commercial and Medicare Research databases. Patients with 1 inpatient or 2 outpatient dyspepsia diagnoses within 12 months following any NVAF diagnosis were grouped into the dyspeptic cohort, and patients without any dyspepsia diagnosis were grouped into the nondyspeptic cohort. Of the overall cohorts, patients were matched by key patient characteristics. Dyspepsia was further categorized as having a prior history of dyspepsia (chronic) or no dyspepsia (nonchronic) during the baseline period. Health care resource utilization, associated costs, and warfarin use were evaluated during a 12-month follow-up period. RESULTS: Of NVAF patients included in the study (N = 142,322), 10.4% were diagnosed with dyspepsia. After matching for key characteristics, NVAF patients with dyspepsia had significantly greater inpatient, outpatient, and prescription claims per patient year than those without dyspepsia (1.24 ± 1.21 vs. 0.36 ± 0.68, P < 0.0001; 110.18 ± 101.03 vs. 66.98 ± 72.43, P < 0.0001; and 52.13 ± 35.30 vs. 44.29 ± 32.41, P < 0.0001, respectively). This greater number of claims was reflected in higher annual inpatient, outpatient, and prescription payments ($23,610 ± $54,748 vs. $5,509 ± $19,142, P < 0.0001; $18,182 ± $28,790 vs. $9,765 ± $22,009, P < 0.0001; and $4,661 ± $5,628 vs. $3,897 ± $4,586, P < 0.0001, respectively). NVAF patients with chronic dyspepsia were the least likely to take warfarin for stroke prevention. CONCLUSIONS: NVAF patients with dyspepsia experienced more all-cause hospitalizations and required more outpatient medical services, all associated with greater expenditures than NVAF patients without dyspepsia. Additionally, dyspepsia may be a barrier to warfarin use among NVAF patients.

Functional dyspepsia: the economic impact to patients.

BACKGROUND: Although highly prevalent, little is known about the economic impact of functional dyspepsia (FD). AIMS: To quantify FD patients' health care utilisation patterns and to estimate direct and indirect costs of FD to patients. METHODS: ICD-9 codes identified adult patients with dyspepsia. A validated questionnaire was mailed to patients who met Rome III criteria for FD. RESULTS: Three hundred and fifty-five patients met all inclusion criteria. The response rate was 63%. The respondents' mean age was 50 (14) years; 75% were women; 52% of respondents rated their FD as moderate. Patients reported 3 visits (mean) to their PCP over 12 months; 75% reported having blood work, 92% an EGD, 59% an ultrasound and 40% a CT scan. The direct cost of testing using Medicare reimbursement rates per patient was $582. To treat FD symptoms, 89% tried dietary changes, 89% over-the-counter medications, 87% prescription medications and 25% alternative therapies. Mean patient expenditure over the last year was $246 for OTC medications (range $0-12,000), $290 for co-payments (range $0-9,000) and $110 for alternative treatments (range $0-3,741). Total mean direct cost yearly to patients was $699. In the 7 days prior to completing the questionnaire, respondents reported a mean of 1.4 h absence from work. Extrapolating the results to the US population, we conservatively calculate the costs of FD were $18.4 billion in 2009. CONCLUSIONS: Functional dyspepsia patients incur significant direct and indirect costs and work productivity is impaired by dyspeptic symptoms.

The epidemiology, diagnosis, and cost of dyspepsia and Helicobacter pylori gastritis: a case-control analysis in the Southwestern United States.

BACKGROUND: Dyspepsia is among the most common complaints evaluated by gastroenterologists, but there are few studies examining its current epidemiology, evaluation, and costs. We examined these issues in a large managed care system in the Southwestern United States. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective case-control analysis of adults with incident dyspepsia or a Helicobacter pylori-related condition in years 2006 through 2010 using utilization data. Medical record abstraction of 400 cases was conducted to obtain additional clinical information. RESULTS: A total of 6989 cases met all inclusion and exclusion criteria. Women had a substantially higher risk of dyspepsia than men (14 per 1000 per year vs 10 per 1000; p < .001), and the incidence of dyspepsia increased with age such that persons in their seventh decade had almost twice the risk of those aged 18-29. Hispanic persons had a significantly higher risk of dyspepsia and positive H. pylori testing. Dyspepsia cases had a higher prevalence of other chronic comorbidities than their matched controls. Dyspepsia patients had healthcare costs 54% higher than controls even before the diagnosis was made, and costs in the initial diagnostic period were $483 greater per person, but subsequent costs were not greatly affected. Among those aged 55 and younger, the "test and treat" approach was used in 53% and another 18% had an initial esophagogastroduodenoscopy, as compared to 47 and 27%, respectively, among those over the age of 55. CONCLUSIONS: Women and older adults have a higher incidence of dyspepsia than previously appreciated, and Hispanics in this region also have a higher risk. Current guidelines for dyspepsia evaluation are only loosely followed.

Zero inflated statistical count models for analysing the costs imposed by GERD and dyspepsia.

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: Recent studies have shown that the high prevalence and the various clinical presentations of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and dyspepsia impose an enormous economic burden on society. Economic cost data have unique characteristics: they are counts, and they have zero inflation. Therefore, these data require special models. Poisson regression (PR), negative binomial regression (NB), zero inflated Poisson (ZIP) and zero inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression are the models used for analysing cost data in this paper. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, a cross-sectional household survey was distributed to a random sample of individuals between May 2006 and December 2007 in the Tehran province of Iran to determine the prevalence of gastrointestinal symptoms and disorders and their related factors. The cost associated with each item was calculated. PR, NB, ZIP and ZINB models were used to analyse the data. The likelihood ratio test and the Voung test were used to conduct pairwise comparisons of the models. The log likelihood, the Akaike information criterion (AIC) and the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) were used to compare the performances of the models. RESULTS: According to the likelihood ratio test and the Voung test and all three criteria used to compare the performance of the models, ZINB regression was identified as the best model for analysing the cost data. Sex, age, smoking status, BMI, insurance status and education were significant predictors. CONCLUSION: Because the NB model demonstrated a better fit than the PR and ZIP models, over-dispersion was clearly only due to unobserved heterogeneity. In contrast, according to the likelihood ratio test, the ZINB model was more appropriate than the ZIP model. The ZINB model for the cost data was more appropriate than the other models.

Guía de práctica clínica sobre el manejo del paciente con dispepsia. Actualización 2012 / Clinical practice guideline on the management of patients with dyspepsia. Update 2012

La finalidad de la Guía de Práctica Clínica (GPC) sobre el Manejo del Paciente con Dispepsia es generar unas recomendaciones acerca del manejo óptimo de la dispepsia en el ámbito de la atención primaria y especializada ambulatoria. Su objetivo principal es ayudar a optimizar el proceso diagnóstico, identificando a los pacientes con bajo riesgo de tener una patología orgánica grave (fundamentalmente tumoral), los cuales podrían ser manejados de forma segura sin necesidad de realizar pruebas diagnósticas invasivas y/o derivaciones al especialista. La importancia de este objetivo radica en la necesidad de no dejar de diagnosticar a los pacientes con un cáncer esófago-gástrico, tratar correctamente la úlcera péptica y, a la vez, reducir las endoscopias negativas para, en definitiva, utilizar de manera adecuada los recursos sanitarios disponibles. En esta GPC se revisan las posibles estrategias iniciales en el paciente con dispepsia no investigada, valorando la posible decisión de iniciar o no un tratamiento empírico o de investigar la existencia de una lesión que justifique los síntomas. Asimismo, en esta GPC se aborda la dispepsia funcional, la cual engloba a todos los pacientes con dispepsia sin una causa orgánica objetivable a través de la endoscopia. En esta GPC también se presentan las recomendaciones para el diagnóstico y tratamiento de la úlcera péptica y de la infección por Helicobacter pylori. Para clasificar la evidencia científica y la fuerza de las recomendaciones se ha utilizado el sistema GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group) (http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/)(AU)

The aim of the Clinical Practice Guideline (CPG) on the Management of Patients with Dyspepsia is to generate recommendations on the optimal approach to dyspepsia in the primary care and specialized outpatient setting. The main objective of this CPG is to help to optimize the diagnostic process, identifying patients with a low risk of a serious organic disease (mainly tumoral), who could be safely managed without the need for invasive diagnostic tests and/or referral to a specialist. The importance of this aim lies in the need to accurately diagnose patients with esophagogastric cancer and correctly treat peptic ulcer while, at the same time, reduce negative endoscopies in order to appropriately use the available healthcare resources. This CPG reviews the initial strategies that can be used in patients with uninvestigated dyspepsia and evaluates the possible decision to begin empirical therapy or to investigate the existence of a lesion that could explain the symptoms. This CPG also discusses functional dyspepsia, which encompasses all patients with dyspepsia with no demonstrable cause on endoscopy. Recommendations for the diagnosis and treatment of peptic ulcer and Helicobacter pylori infection are also made. To classify the scientific evidence and strengthen the recommendations, the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group) system has been used (http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/)(AU)

Manejo del paciente con dispepsia. Guía de práctica clínica. Actualización 2012. Resumen ejecutivo / Managing of the patient with dyspepsia. Clinical Practice Guideline. Update 2012

El programa de «Elaboración de guías de práctica clínica en enfermedades digestivas, desde la atención primaria a la especializada» es un proyecto compartido por la Asociación Española de Gastroenterología (AEG), la Sociedad Española de Medicina de Familia y Comunitaria (semFYC) y el Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano (CCI). Presentamos la actualización de la guía sobre el manejo de la dispepsia que se publicó en el año 2003. En su elaboración se han tenido en cuenta los criterios esenciales contemplados en el instrumento Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation for Europe (AGREE). Para clasificar la evidencia científica y fuerza de las recomendaciones se ha utilizado el sistema Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation Working Group (GRADE)(AU)

The "Preparation of Clinical Practice Guidelines in Digestive Diseases, from Primary Care to Specialist Care" Program, is a joint project by the Spanish Gastroenterology Association (AEG), the Spanish Society of Family and Community Medicine (SEMFyC), and the IberoAmerican Cochrane Center (CCI). We present the update of the Guidelines on the Management of Dyspepsia, which was published in 2003. The essential criteria provided in the AGREE (Appraisal of Guidelines, Research and Evaluation for Europe) Instrument were taken into account in the preparation of this document. The GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) system was used to classify the scientific evidence and strengthen the recommendations(AU)

Use of health care services and pharmaceutical agents in coeliac disease: a prospective nationwide study.

BACKGROUND: Approximately 1% of the population suffer from coeliac disease. However, the disease is heavily underdiagnosed. Unexplained symptoms may lead to incremented medical consultations and productivity losses. The aim here was to estimate the possible concealed burden of untreated coeliac disease and the effects of a gluten-free diet. METHODS: A nationwide cohort of 700 newly detected adult coeliac patients were prospectively evaluated. Health care service use and sickness absence from work during the year before diagnosis were compared with those in the general population; the data obtained from an earlier study. Additionally, the effect of one year on dietary treatment on the aforementioned parameters and on consumption of pharmaceutical agents was assessed. RESULTS: Untreated coeliac patients used primary health care services more frequently than the general population. On a gluten-free diet, visits to primary care decreased significantly from a mean 3.6 to 2.3. The consumption of medicines for dyspepsia (from 3.7 to 2.4 pills/month) and painkillers (6.8-5.5 pills/month) and the number of antibiotic courses (0.6-0.5 prescriptions/year) was reduced. There were no changes in hospitalizations, outpatient visits to secondary and tertiary care, use of other medical services, or sickness absence, but the consumption of nutritional supplements increased on treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Coeliac disease was associated with excessive health care service use and consumption of drugs before diagnosis. Dietary treatment resulted in a diminished burden to the health care system and lower use of on-demand medicines and antibiotic treatment. The results support an augmented diagnostic approach to reduce underdiagnosis of coeliac disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01145287.

Excess comorbidity prevalence and cost associated with functional dyspepsia in an employed population.

BACKGROUND: Limited published data exist on the associated comorbid conditions with functional dyspepsia (FD). AIMS: This study aimed to assess the prevalence, services, and costs related to comorbid conditions associated with FD and the risk of having FD for each comorbid condition. METHODS: A retrospective database analysis was undertaken using payroll data and adjudicated claims from January 1, 2001, through December 31, 2004 among >300,000 employees. Employees with FD were compared to propensity-score-matched employees without FD (controls). Outcome measures included the prevalence, costs, and utilization of health services for comorbid conditions as defined by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and the odds ratios of having FD from a multivariate model. RESULTS: FD employees (N = 1,669) and a 50:1 matched control cohort (N = 83,450) were compared. Compared to matched controls, FD employees were more likely to have all major diagnostic categories. Moreover, 199/261 of the AHRQ's specific categories were more common in the FD cohort. Annual medical costs for the FD cohort were greater than for controls in 155/261 (59%) specific categories and significantly greater (P ≤ 0.05) in 76 categories (29%). Similarly, services were greater for 179/261 (69%) specific categories and significantly greater (P ≤ 0.05) in 110 categories (42%). In a multivariate model, esophageal disorders, gastritis and duodenitis, and abdominal pain were the most associated with having FD (odds ratios 3.8, 3.7, and 3.6, respectively). Only hypertension complications and disorders of the teeth and jaw were significantly negatively associated with FD. CONCLUSION: There is unexplained excess comorbidity associated with FD which may be a major determining factor for excess healthcare services and costs.

Influence of organic and functional dyspepsia on work productivity: the HEROES-DIP study.

OBJECTIVES: Dyspepsia is defined as persistent or recurrent abdominal pain or discomfort centered in the upper abdomen. Dyspepsia represents up to 8.3% of all primary care physician visits and causes huge economic costs to patients and to the economy as a whole. The aim of this study was to measure the influence of dyspepsia on work productivity of people within the Brazilian workforce. METHODS: Adult patients were enrolled if they met the Roma III criteria for uninvestigated dyspepsia. All patients answered a demographic questionnaire. Productivity impairment was measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire. Subjects underwent upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and were classified as having functional or organic dyspepsia. The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Brazil. RESULTS: Eight hundred fifty patients with dyspepsia were evaluated: 628 were women (73.9%); mean age was 46.4 ± 12.9 years; 387 (45.5%) were active workers. Among active workers, 32.2% mentioned that dyspepsia had caused absenteeism from work during the preceding week and 78% reported a reduction of the work productivity (presenteeism). The lost work productivity score was 35.7% among all employed patients. The affect on work productivity was similar between patients with functional or organic dyspepsia. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed an important influence of dyspepsia on work productivity. We did not find any statistically significant difference on the influence on work between patients with organic dyspepsia and functional dyspepsia. The social impact of these findings is underscored by taking into account the prevalence (up to 40%) of this condition in Brazil.