[Cilostazol was effective for capsular warning syndrome during anticoagulant therapy: a case report].

An 88-year-old woman with atrial fibrillation was admitted to our hospital due to the right hemiplegia and aphasia. MRA shows the left middle cerebral artery M2 occlusion. After intravenous rt-PA, her symptoms improved. She was diagnosed with cardioembolic stroke, and was treated with direct oral anticoagulation therapy. However, she had repeated stereotypical transient right hemiparesis a week after index stroke. Her symptoms were considered capsular warning syndrome (CWS). After cilostazol was administered, no further transient neurological deteriorations occurred. CWS can coexist with acute cardioembolic stroke, and cilostazol was effective.

Clinical Benefits of Oral Anticoagulants for Elderly Patients With Cardioembolic Stroke at High Bleeding Risk.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The relationship between the severity of cardioembolic stroke (CES) and oral anticoagulant (OAC) treatment before stroke onset in very elderly (≥80 years) patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) at high bleeding risk remains unknown. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 364 consecutive patients (≥80 years) with CES and NVAF within 48 h following stroke onset were investigated. High bleeding risk was defined as follows: Bleeding history, renal dysfunction (creatinine clearance <30 ml/min), low body weight (≤45 kg), and antiplatelet or nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use. Patients were divided into two groups: High bleeding risk (n=214) and non-high bleeding risk (n=150). We assessed stroke severity and functional outcome between the two groups, and evaluated the effect of therapy with direct OAC (DOAC) on stroke severity in the high-risk group. RESULTS: The high-risk group had a worse modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge than the non-high-risk group [median: 4 (range=2-5) vs. 3 (range=1-4); p=0.02]. Patients in the high-risk group were categorized according to OAC treatment before stroke onset: No OAC (n=148), warfarin (n=46), and DOAC (n=20). The numbers of patients with National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (NIHSS) ≥8 on admission in these groups were 104 (70%), 30 (65%), and 8 (40%) (p=0.03), respectively. Multivariate analysis confirmed that DOAC therapy had a lower odds ratio (OR) for severe stroke (NIHSS ≥8) on admission (OR relative to no OAC=0.22, 95% confidence interval=0.08-0.62; p=0.005) and poor functional outcome (mRS ≥4) at discharge (OR=0.31, 95% confidence interval=0.11-0.90; p=0.03). CONCLUSION: Very elderly patients with CES at high bleeding risk have unfavorable functional outcomes. DOAC administration may be associated with reduced stroke severity.

Embolic stroke and misidentification candida species endocarditis: Case presentation and literature review.

Fungal endocarditis is a rare but serious form of infective endocarditis associated with high morbidity and mortality. Among fungal pathogens, Candida species are the most frequently isolated and commonly found in individuals with predisposing factors, such as prosthetic heart valves. The clinical presentation of endocarditis is highly variable and nonspecific, often including symptoms and signs of embolization. In this paper, we present a case of fungal prosthetic valve endocarditis in which the initial presentation was an acute ischemic stroke. The initial misidentification of Candida famata was attributed to limitations in the presumptive methodology used through selective chromogenic culture identification. However, the surgical specimen underwent mass spectrometry, leading to the correct identification of Candida guilliermondii instead of Candida famata. Furthermore, we conducted a non-systematic narrative review of the literature on Candida endocarditis. Our findings underscore the importance of considering fungal endocarditis in the differential diagnosis of patients with possible extracardiac complications, particularly those with a history of heart valve replacement. Early diagnosis and a comprehensive treatment strategy tailored by species identification and antifungal susceptibility testing are crucial in improving patient outcomes.

[Embolic stroke of undetermined source - ESUS: a new challenge for the cardiologist]. / Ictus embolico di origine indeterminata ­ ESUS: una nuova sfida per il cardiologo.

Embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) is a new clinical entity which requires an accurate diagnostic work-up. The involvement of the cardiologist in this challenge is of paramount importance as in many cases an occult cardioembolic source is detectable. In the absence of subclinical atrial fibrillation detectable by prolonged ECG monitoring, potential causes of ESUS include atrial cardiomyopathy, left ventricular dysfunction or heart failure, aortic plaques and patent foramen ovale. The assessment of a causal relationship between these cardiac abnormalities and ESUS is often a difficult challenge and the randomized clinical trials performed so far failed to demonstrate a superiority of direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) over aspirin. In selected individual patients with heart failure in sinus rhythm with high CHA2DS2-VASc score, or aortic plaques with thrombotic component, oral anticoagulation with DOAC might be considered even in the absence of evidence from randomized clinical trials.

Association of tirofiban treatment with outcomes following endovascular therapy in cardioembolic stroke: insights from the RESCUE BT randomized trial.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The efficacy and safety of tirofiban in endovascular therapy for cardioembolic ischemic stroke patients remain controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the role of intravenous tirofiban before endovascular therapy in cardioembolic stroke. METHODS: This post hoc analysis utilized data from the RESCUE BT (Endovascular Treatment With versus Without Tirofiban for Patients with Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke) trial, which was an investigator-initiated, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Participants were randomized to receive either tirofiban or a placebo in a 1:1 ratio before undergoing endovascular therapy. The study included patients aged 18 years or older, presenting with occlusion of the internal carotid artery or middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1/M2 within 24 h of the last known well time, and with a stroke etiology of cardioembolism. The primary efficacy outcome was global disability at 90 days, assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS). The safety outcome included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 48 h and mortality within 90 days. RESULTS: A total of 406 cardioembolic stroke patients were included in this study, with 212 assigned to the tirofiban group and 194 assigned to the placebo group. Tirofiban treatment did not correlate with a favorable shift towards a lower 90-day mRS score (adjusted common odds ratio [OR], 0.91; 95% CI 0.64-1.3; p = 0.617). However, the tirofiban group had a significantly higher risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 48 h (adjusted OR, 3.26; 95% CI 1.4-7.57; p = 0.006) compared to the placebo group. The adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for mortality within 90 days was 1.48 (95% CI 0.88-2.52; p = 0.143). CONCLUSIONS: Tirofiban treatment was not associated with a lower level of disability and increased the incidence of sICH after endovascular therapy in cardioembolic stroke patients.

Focal Anticoagulation by Somatic Gene Transfer: Towards Preventing Cardioembolic Stroke.

Cardioembolic stroke (CS) has emerged as a leading cause of ischaemic stroke (IS); distinguished by thrombi embolising to the brain from cardiac origins; most often from the left atrial appendage (LAA). Contemporary therapeutic options are largely dependent on systemic anticoagulation as a blanket preventative strategy, yet this does not represent a nuanced or personalised solution. Contraindications to systemic anticoagulation create significant unmedicated and high-risk cohorts, leaving these patients at risk of significant morbidity and mortality. Atrial appendage occlusion devices are increasingly used to mitigate stroke risk from thrombi emerging from the LAA in patients ineligible for oral anticoagulants (OACs). Their use, however, is not without risk or significant cost, and does not address the underlying aetiology of thrombosis and CS. Viral vector-based gene therapy has emerged as a novel strategy to target a spectrum of haemostatic disorders, achieving success through the adeno-associated virus (AAV) based therapy of haemophilia. Yet, thrombotic disorders, such as CS, have had limited exploration within the realm of AAV gene therapy approaches-presenting a gap in the literature and an opportunity for further research. Gene therapy has the potential to directly address the cause of CS by localised targeting of the molecular remodelling that serves to promote thrombosis.

A hybrid automated event adjudication system for clinical trials.

INTRODUCTION: In clinical trials, event adjudication is a process to review and confirm the accuracy of outcomes reported by site investigators. Despite efforts to automate the communication between a clinical-data-and-coordination center and an event adjudication committee, the review and confirmation of outcomes, as the core function of the process, still fully rely on human labor. To address this issue, we present an automated event adjudication system and its application in two randomized controlled trials. METHODS: Centrally executed by a clinical-data-and-coordination center, the automated event adjudication system automatedly assessed and classified outcomes in a clinical data management system. By checking clinically predefined criteria, the automated event adjudication system either confirmed or unconfirmed an outcome and automatedly updated its status in the database. It also served as a management tool to assist staff to oversee the process of event adjudication. The system has been applied in: (1) the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial and (2) the New Approach riVaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global trial versus Aspirin to prevenT Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (NAVIGATE ESUS) trial. The automated event adjudication system first screened outcomes reported on a case report form and confirmed those with data matched to preset definitions. For selected primary efficacy, secondary, and safety outcomes, the unconfirmed cases were referred to a human event adjudication committee for a final decision. In the New Approach riVaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global trial versus Aspirin to prevenT Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source (NAVIGATE ESUS) trial, human adjudicators were given priority to review cases, while the automated event adjudication system took the lead in the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies (COMPASS) trial. RESULTS: Outcomes that were adjudicated in a hybrid model are discussed here. The COMPASS automated event adjudication system adjudicated 3283 primary efficacy outcomes and confirmed 1652 (50.3%): 132 (21.1%) strokes, 522 (53%) myocardial infarctions, and 998 (59.7%) causes of deaths. The NAVIGATE ESUS one adjudicated 737 cases of selected outcomes and confirmed 383 (52%): 219 (51.5%) strokes, 34 (42.5%) myocardial infarctions, 73 (54.9%) causes of deaths, and 57 (57.6%) major bleedings. After one deducts the time needed for migrating the system to a new study, the automated event adjudication system helped to reduce the time required for human review from approximately 1303 to 716.5 h for the Cardiovascular Outcomes for People Using Anticoagulation Strategies trial and from 387 to 196 h for the New Approach riVaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global trial versus Aspirin to prevenT Embolism in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source trial. CONCLUSION: The automated event adjudication system in combination with human adjudicators provides a streamlined and efficient approach to event adjudication in clinical trials. To immediately apply automated event adjudication, one can first consider the automated event adjudication system and involve human assistance for cases unconfirmed by the former.

Association Between Oral Anticoagulants and Stroke Severity at Onset in Elderly Patients with Cardioembolic Stroke Due to Non-Valvular Atrial Fibrillation.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to determine whether oral anticoagulant therapy affects the severity of cerebral infarction at onset in elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 330 elderly patients (aged ≥75 years) who were hospitalized for cardioembolic stroke due to non-valvular atrial fibrillation. Patients' medical history, stroke severity at onset (National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score), and the prevalence of large vessel occlusion were compared between patients who received oral anticoagulant therapy (n = 109) and those who did not receive oral anticoagulant therapy (n = 221). RESULTS: Stroke severity was significantly lower in patients who received anticoagulants than in those who did not receive anticoagulants (6 versus 12; P = 0.021). Patients who did not receive anticoagulants had a significantly higher prevalence of large vessel occlusion (52% versus 37%; P = 0.010). After resampling based on propensity score matching, both median stroke severity (7 versus 12; P = 0.046) and large vessel occlusion prevalence (36% versus 57%; P = 0.019) were significantly lower in patients who received anticoagulant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest that elderly patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation who are administered oral anticoagulant therapy before the onset of cerebral infarction develop less severe stroke than those who are not receiving oral anticoagulant therapy. Thus, oral anticoagulant therapy should be actively considered in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation as it does not only prevents cerebral embolism, but also reduces the risk of severe sequelae.

Acute Hyperglycemia Exacerbates Hemorrhagic Transformation after Embolic Stroke and Reperfusion with tPA: A Possible Role of TXNIP-NLRP3 Inflammasome.

OBJECTIVES: Acute hyperglycemia (HG) exacerbates reperfusion injury after stroke. Our recent studies showed that acute HG upregulates thioredoxin-interacting protein (TXNIP) expression, which in turn induces inflammation and neurovascular damage in a suture model of ischemic stroke. The aim of the present study was to investigate the effect of acute HG on TXNIP-associated neurovascular damage, in a more clinically relevant murine model of embolic stroke and intravenous tissue plasminogen activator (IV-tPA) reperfusion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: HG was induced in adult male mice, by intraperitoneal injection of 20% glucose. This was followed by embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion (eMCAO), with or without IV-tPA (10 mg/kg) given 3 h post embolization. Brain infarction, edema, hemoglobin content, expression of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP-9), vascular endothelial growth factor A (VEGFA), tight junction proteins (claudin-5, occluding, and zonula occludens-1), TXNIP, and NOD-like receptor protein3 (NLRP3)-inflammasome activation were evaluated at 24 h after eMCAO. RESULTS: HG alone significantly increased TXNIP in the brain after eMCAO, and this was associated with exacerbated hemorrhagic transformation (HT; as measured by hemoglobin content). IV-tPA in HG conditions showed a trend to decrease infarct volume, but worsened HT after eMCAO, suggesting that HG reduces the therapeutic efficacy of IV-tPA. Further, HG and tPA-reperfusion did not show significant differences in expression of MMP-9, VEGFA, junction proteins, and NLRP3 inflammasome activation between the groups. CONCLUSION: The current findings suggest a potential role for TXNIP in the occurrence of HT in hyperglycemic conditions following eMCAO. Further studies are needed to understand the precise role of vascular TXNIP on HG/tPA-induced neurovascular damage after stroke.

Left Ventricular Dysfunction Among Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source and the Effect of Rivaroxaban vs Aspirin: A Subgroup Analysis of the NAVIGATE ESUS Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: It is uncertain whether anticoagulation is superior to aspirin at reducing recurrent stroke in patients with recent embolic strokes of undetermined source (ESUS) and left ventricular (LV) dysfunction. Objective: To determine whether anticoagulation is superior to aspirin in reducing recurrent stroke in patients with ESUS and LV dysfunction. Design, Setting, and Participants: Post hoc exploratory analysis of data from the New Approach Rivaroxaban Inhibition of Factor Xa in a Global Trial vs Aspirin to Prevent Embolism in ESUS (NAVIGATE ESUS) trial, a randomized, phase 3 clinical trial with enrollment from December 2014 to September 2017. The study setting included 459 stroke recruitment centers in 31 countries. Patients 50 years or older who had neuroimaging-confirmed ESUS between 7 days and 6 months before screening were eligible. Of the 7213 NAVIGATE ESUS participants, 7107 (98.5%) had a documented assessment of LV function at study entry and were included in the present analysis. Data were analyzed in January 2021. Interventions: Participants were randomized to receive either 15 mg of rivaroxaban or 100 mg of aspirin once daily. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study examined whether rivaroxaban was superior to aspirin at reducing the risk of (1) the trial primary outcome of recurrent stroke or systemic embolism and (2) the trial secondary outcome of recurrent stroke, systemic embolism, myocardial infarction, or cardiovascular mortality during a median follow-up of 10.4 months. LV dysfunction was identified locally through echocardiography and defined as moderate to severe global impairment in LV contractility and/or a regional wall motion abnormality. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to assess for treatment interaction and to estimate the hazard ratios for those randomized to rivaroxaban vs aspirin by LV dysfunction status. Results: LV dysfunction was present in 502 participants (7.1%). Of participants with LV dysfunction, the mean (SD) age was 67 (10) years, and 130 (26%) were women. Among participants with LV dysfunction, annualized primary event rates were 2.4% (95% CI, 1.1-5.4) in those assigned to rivaroxaban vs 6.5% (95% CI, 4.0-11.0) in those assigned aspirin. Among the 6605 participants without LV dysfunction, rates were similar between those assigned to rivaroxaban (5.3%; 95% CI, 4.5-6.2) vs aspirin (4.5%; 95% CI, 3.8-5.3). Participants with LV dysfunction assigned to rivaroxaban vs aspirin had a lower risk of the primary outcome (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.14-0.93), unlike those without LV dysfunction (hazard ratio, 1.16; 95% CI, 0.93-1.46) (P for treatment interaction = .03). Results were similar for the secondary outcome. Conclusions and Relevance: In this post hoc exploratory analysis, rivaroxaban was superior to aspirin in reducing the risk of recurrent stroke or systemic embolism among NAVIGATE ESUS participants with LV dysfunction. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02313909.

Embolic Stroke Model with Magnetic Nanoparticles.

Stroke models are vital tools in neuropharmacology and rehabilitation research. However, a classic and widely used model-the suture occlusion model-is not suitable for all research approaches, especially regarding thrombolysis. For embolic stroke models in thrombolytic research, the surgical procedures of thrombin injection in the middle cerebral artery or clot injection in the carotid artery involved are too sophisticated. Here, we report a new stroke model in mice that uses magnetic nanoparticle (MNP) cross-linked with thrombin to embolize. Briefly, after the magnet was positioned in the common carotid artery, MNP@Thrombin was injected from the tail vein. Within several minutes postinjection, the MNP@Thrombin accumulated in the carotid artery and induced thrombus formation. These complex clots were flushed into and subsequently blocked the cerebral artery. Collectively, these results suggested that this new method was a quick and easy stroke model that blocked hemisphere blood flow and damaged neural function. Importantly, this model had an excellent response to thrombolytic drugs. After urokinase injection, cerebral blood flow was restored and symptom scores were enhanced by nearly one. This method, including a quick synthesis of MNP and thrombin, provided an easy and minimally invasive process for a new stroke model that is usable in both pharmacological and rehabilitative research.

Reexamination of the Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source Concept.

Occult atrial fibrillation (AF) is a leading cause of stroke of unclear cause. The optimal approach to secondary stroke prevention for these patients remains elusive. The term embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS) was coined to describe ischemic strokes in which the radiographic features demonstrate territorial infarcts resembling those seen in patients with confirmed sources of embolism but without a clear source of embolism detected. It was assumed that patients with ESUS had a high rate of occult AF and would benefit from treatment with direct oral anticoagulants, which are at least as effective as vitamin K antagonists for secondary stroke prevention in patients with AF, but with a much lower risk of intracerebral hemorrhage. Two recent large randomized trials failed to show superiority of direct oral anticoagulants over aspirin in ESUS patients. These findings prompt a reexamination of the ESUS concept, with the goal of improving specificity for detecting patients with a cardioembolic cause. Based on the negative trial results, there is renewed interest in the role of long-term cardiac monitoring for AF in patients who fit the current ESUS definition, as well as the clinical implication of detecting AF. Ongoing trials are exploring these questions. Current ESUS definitions do not accurately detect the patients who should be prescribed direct oral anticoagulants, potentially because occult AF is less common than expected in these patients and/or anticoagulants may be less beneficial in patients with ESUS but no AF than they are for patients with stroke with established AF. More specific criteria to identify patients who may be at higher risk for occult AF and reduce their risk of subsequent stroke have been developed and are being tested in ongoing clinical trials.

Effect of Alteplase Use on Outcomes in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation: Analysis of the Initiation of Anticoagulation After Cardioembolic Stroke Study.

Background Intravenous alteplase improves outcome after acute ischemic stroke without a benefit in 90-day mortality. There are limited data on whether alteplase is associated with reduced mortality in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF)-related ischemic stroke whose mortality rate is relatively high. We sought to determine the association of alteplase with hemorrhagic transformation and mortality in patients with AF. Methods and Results We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke between 2015 and 2018 diagnosed with AF included in the IAC (Initiation of Anticoagulation After Cardioembolic Stroke) study, which pooled data from stroke registries at 8 comprehensive stroke centers across the United States. For our primary analysis, we included patients who did not undergo mechanical thrombectomy (MT), and secondary analyses included patients who underwent MT. We used binary logistic regression to determine whether alteplase use was associated with risk of hemorrhagic transformation and 90-day mortality. There were 1889 patients (90.6%) who had 90-day follow-up data available for analyses and were included; 1367 patients (72.4%) did not receive MT, and 522 patients (27.6%) received MT. In our primary analyses we found that alteplase use was independently associated with an increased risk for hemorrhagic transformation (odds ratio [OR], 2.23; 95% CI, 1.57-3.17) but reduced risk of 90-day mortality (OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39-0.87). Among patients undergoing MT, alteplase use was not associated with a significant reduction in 90-day mortality (OR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.45-1.04). Conclusions Alteplase reduced 90-day mortality of patients with acute ischemic stroke with AF not undergoing MT. Further study is required to assess the efficacy of alteplase in patients with AF undergoing MT.

The Effect of Statin Treatment on Outcomes of Cardioembolic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Real-World Studies.

BACKGROUND: Several real-world observational studies have investigated the association between statin treatment and outcomes of cardioembolic stroke. However, substantial uncertainties remain about this association. OBJECTIVE: We aimed to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis to determine the effect of statin treatment on the outcomes of cardioembolic stroke. METHODS: We systematically searched the PubMed and Embase databases for relevant clinical studies. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) with a random-effects model were used to assess the outcomes of interest. RESULTS: A total of 18 observational studies published between 2009 and 2020 were included. No randomized clinical trial was found. Compared with non-statin treatment, statin treatment was not associated with a decreased risk of stroke recurrence in patients with cardioembolic stroke [PWCS] (RR, 0.93; 95% CI 0.82-1.06). However, compared with non-statin treatment, statin treatment was associated with a lower risk of all-cause death (RR, 0.59; 95% CI 0.49-0.73) and better functional outcomes (RR, 0.67; 95% CI 0.47-0.97) in PWCS. There was no significant association between statin treatment and major bleeding event risk in PWCS (RR, 0.35; 95% CI 0.06-2.16). Compared with non-statin treatment, statin treatment was not associated with a decreased risk of coronary atherosclerotic disease in PWCS (RR, 1.04; 95% CI 0.96-1.11). CONCLUSIONS: Although the use of statins does not enhance the prevention of stroke recurrence in PWCS, statin treatment is associated with improved clinical outcomes in PWCS. Statins play a beneficial role in the treatment of cardioembolic stroke.

Pinocembrin attenuates hemorrhagic transformation after delayed t-PA treatment in thromboembolic stroke rats by regulating endogenous metabolites.

Hemorrhagic transformation (HT) is a common serious complication of stroke after thrombolysis treatment, which limits the clinical use of tissue plasminogen activator (t-PA). Since early diagnosis and treatment for HT is important to improve the prognosis of stroke patients, it is urgent to discover the potential biomarkers and therapeutic drugs. Recent evidence shows that pinocembrin, a natural flavonoid compound, exerts anti-cerebral ischemia effect and expands the time window of t-PA. In this study, we investigated the effect of pinocembrin on t-PA-induced HT and the potential biomarkers for HT after t-PA thrombolysis, thereby improving the prognosis of stroke. Electrocoagulation-induced thrombotic focal ischemic rats received intravenous infusion of t-PA (10 mg/kg) 6 h after ischemia. Administration of pinocembrin (10 mg/kg, iv) prior t-PA infusion significantly decreased the infarct volume, ameliorated t-PA-induced HT, and protected blood-brain barrier. Metabolomics analysis revealed that 5 differential metabolites in the cerebral cortex and 16 differential metabolites in serum involved in amino acid metabolism and energy metabolism were significantly changed after t-PA thrombolysis, whereas pinocembrin administration exerted significant intervention effects on these metabolites. Linear regression analysis showed that lactic acid was highly correlated to the occurrence of HT. Further experiments confirmed that t-PA treatment significantly increased the content of lactic acid and the activity of lactate dehydrogenase in the cerebral cortex and serum, and the expression of monocarboxylate transporter 1 (MCT 1) in the cerebral cortex; pinocembrin reversed these changes, which was consistent with the result of metabolomics. These results demonstrate that pinocembrin attenuates HT after t-PA thrombolysis, which may be associated with the regulation of endogenous metabolites. Lactic acid may be a potential biomarker for HT prediction and treatment.

Dabigatran or Aspirin in East Asian Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source: RE-SPECT ESUS Subgroup Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: We assessed the outcomes of dabigatran versus aspirin in a prespecified subgroup analysis of East Asian patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source in the RE-SPECT ESUS trial (Randomized, Double-Blind, Evaluation in Secondary Stroke Prevention Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Etexilate Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source). METHODS: Patients with a recent embolic stroke of undetermined source were randomized to dabigatran (150 or 110 mg BID) or aspirin (100 mg QD). The primary efficacy outcome was recurrent stroke; the primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The East Asia cohort was compared with patients from all other countries (non-East Asia cohort). RESULTS: Overall, 988 of 5390 patients (18%) were randomized in East Asia. During a median follow-up of 18.8 months, there was no statistically significant difference in recurrent stroke (hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.41-1.03]) or major bleeding (hazard ratio, 1.04 [95% CI, 0.57-1.91]) in East Asian patients receiving dabigatran versus aspirin. Death from any cause occurred more often in the dabigatran versus the aspirin group (hazard ratio, 3.98 [95% CI, 1.32-12.01]). CONCLUSIONS: The treatment effect of dabigatran versus aspirin was consistent between cohorts, with no apparent superiority for dabigatran over aspirin in preventing recurrent stroke in patients with embolic stroke of undetermined source. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02239120.

Dabigatran or Aspirin After Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source in Patients With Patent Foramen Ovale: Results From RE-SPECT ESUS.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Patent foramen ovale (PFO) may increase the risk of embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). Guidelines suggest anticoagulation may be more effective than antiplatelets in preventing stroke in patients with ESUS and PFO when interventional closure is not performed. METHODS: Patients with ESUS randomized to dabigatran (150/110 mg BID) or aspirin (100 mg QD) from the RE-SPECT ESUS study (Randomized, Double-Blind, Evaluation in Secondary Stroke Prevention Comparing the Efficacy and Safety of the Oral Thrombin Inhibitor Dabigatran Etexilate Versus Acetylsalicylic Acid in Patients With Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source) were included. The rate of recurrent stroke (primary end point) and ischemic stroke was reported for patients with and without baseline PFO. A meta-analysis comparing the effects of anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy on ischemic stroke in patients with PFO was updated to include RE-SPECT ESUS. RESULTS: PFO was present in 680 of 5388 (12.6%) patients with documented PFO status. The risk of recurrent stroke with dabigatran versus aspirin was similar in patients with and without PFO (P for interaction, 0.8290). In patients with PFO, the meta-analysis found no statistically significant difference between anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy (odds ratio, 0.70 [95% CI, 0.43-1.14]) for ischemic stroke. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence to recommend anticoagulation over antiplatelet therapy for patients with ESUS and a PFO. More data are needed to guide antithrombotic therapy in this population. Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT02239120.

Atrial Fibrillation and Stroke.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is the most common cardiac arrythmia and a major cause of stroke, heart failure, sudden death, and cardiovascular morbidity. AF increases risk of thromboembolic stroke via stasis in the left atrium and subsequent embolization to the brain. In patients with acute ischemic stroke, it is essential that clinicians undertake careful investigation to search for AF. In these patients, up to 23.7% eventually are found to have underlying AF. Oral anticoagulation is effective in prevention of strokes secondary to AF, reducing overall stroke numbers by approximately 64%. Left atrial appendage occlusion is promising for prevention of stroke in AF.

tPA Mobilizes Immune Cells That Exacerbate Hemorrhagic Transformation in Stroke.

RATIONALE: Hemorrhagic complications represent a major limitation of intravenous thrombolysis using tPA (tissue-type plasminogen activator) in patients with ischemic stroke. The expression of tPA receptors on immune cells raises the question of what effects tPA exerts on these cells and whether these effects contribute to thrombolysis-related hemorrhagic transformation. OBJECTIVE: We aim to determine the impact of tPA on immune cells and investigate the association between observed immune alteration with hemorrhagic transformation in ischemic stroke patients and in a rat model of embolic stroke. METHODS AND RESULTS: Paired blood samples were collected before and 1 hour after tPA infusion from 71 patients with ischemic stroke. Control blood samples were collected from 27 ischemic stroke patients without tPA treatment. A rat embolic middle cerebral artery occlusion model was adopted to investigate the underlying mechanisms of hemorrhagic transformation. We report that tPA induces a swift surge of circulating neutrophils and T cells with profoundly altered molecular features in ischemic stroke patients and a rat model of focal embolic stroke. tPA exacerbates endothelial injury, increases adhesion and migration of neutrophils and T cells, which are associated with brain hemorrhage in rats subjected to embolic stroke. Genetic ablation of annexin A2 in neutrophils and T cells diminishes the effect of tPA on these cells. Decoupling the interaction between mobilized neutrophils/T cells and the neurovascular unit, achieved via a S1PR (sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor) 1 modulator RP101075 and a CCL2 (C-C motif chemokine ligand 2) synthesis inhibitor bindarit, which block lymphocyte egress and myeloid cell recruitment, respectively, attenuates hemorrhagic transformation and improves neurological function after tPA thrombolysis. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that immune invasion of the neurovascular unit represents a previously unrecognized mechanism underlying tPA-mediated brain hemorrhage, which can be overcome by precise immune modulation during thrombolytic therapy.