Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 31
Filtrar
Más filtros











Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Acta bioeth ; 22(2): 195-202, nov. 2016.
Artículo en Español | LILACS | ID: biblio-827606

RESUMEN

La utilización de embriones humanos en la investigación biológica ha generado un debate ético desde la discusión ontológica, en relación a si se puede o no considerar al embrión persona humana. En este artículo se análiza el estatuto ontológico del embrión humano desde una perspectiva biológica, considerando las principales líneas de investigación que lo intervienen en América Latina. Adcionalmente, revisamos el aporte desde el estatuto legal del embrión humano en esta región y la postura desde la formalidad de la investigación cientifica en el cuidado de su utilización. Consideramos finalmente que en América Latina no se ha abordado de manera profunda la discusión en torno al estatuto del embrión humano como persona, quedando la discusión en una dimensión biológica.


The utilization of human embryos in the biological research has generated a bioethical debate from the ontological point of view about whether or not to consider the embryo as a human person. This paper review the ontological statute of the human embryo from a biological perspective considering the principal lines of investigation in Latin America. Complementary to discussion we check the contribution from the legal statute of the human embryo and the position from the formal scientific research in his utilization. Finally, we consider that, in Latin America, the discussion has not been approached in a deep way about the statute of the human embryo as person, staying the discussion in a dimension of the biological thing.


A utilização de embriões humanos na investigação biológica tem gerado um debate ético a partir da discussão ontológica, com relação a se deveria ou não considerar o embrião pessoa humana. Neste artigo se analisa o estatuto ontológico do embrião humano a partir de uma perspectiva biológica, considerando as principais linhas de investigação de intervenção no embrião na América Latina. Adicionalmente, revisamos a contribuição a partir do estatuto legal do embrião humano nesta região e a postura a partir da formalidade da investigação cientifica no cuidado de sua utilização. Consideramos finalmente que na América Latina não se tem abordado de maneira profunda a discussão em torno do estatuto do embrião humano como pessoa, tornando-se a discussão uma dimensão biológica.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Bioética , Investigaciones con Embriones/ética , Embrión de Mamíferos , Personeidad , Investigaciones con Embriones/legislación & jurisprudencia , América Latina
2.
Soc Stud Sci ; 41(2): 227-50, 2011 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21998923

RESUMEN

New forms of life produced by biomedical research, such as human embryonic stem cells (hESC), have been the object of public debate beyond the scientific fields involved. This article brings to light the case of Brazil, where recently passed federal legislation has authorized research with in vitro human embryos. It focuses on the legislative debate in the Brazilian National Congress between 2003 and 2005 on the Biosafety Bill of Law, which cleared for hESC research a certain share of supernumerary and unviable human embryos frozen in the country's assisted reproduction clinics. The passing of this Bill triggered other public reactions, chiefly a Direct Action of Unconstitutionality in Brazil's Federal Supreme Court. This study adopts an anthropological perspective for describing and analyzing the chief arguments in both debates, in terms of how the notion of 'life' was deployed and negotiated by contending parties. If, on the one hand, the definition of life appeared firmly attached to a conception of both the in vitro embryo and the fetus as a human person, on the other a movement towards breaking down life along utilitarian lines was found when the potential beneficiaries of stem cell therapy came into the equation. In all cases, however, notions of life were negotiated from a hybrid continuum of (biological) facts and (religious, moral and juridical) values, and resonated in different ways with the idea of the individual as privileged mode of constructing personhood in the context of modern nation states.


Asunto(s)
Investigaciones con Embriones/ética , Investigaciones con Embriones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Personeidad , Investigación con Células Madre/ética , Investigación con Células Madre/legislación & jurisprudencia , Antropología Cultural , Comienzo de la Vida Humana , Brasil , Análisis Ético , Humanos , Religión y Medicina
4.
Dev World Bioeth ; 10(3): 120-8, 2010 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-20089053

RESUMEN

In this article, the authors focus on Argentina's activity in the developing field of regenerative medicine, specifically stem cell research. They take as a starting point a recent article by Shawn Harmon (published in this journal) who argues that attempts to regulate the practice in Argentina are morally incoherent. The authors try to show first, that there is no such 'attempt to legislate' on stem cell research in Argentina and this is due to a number of reasons that they explain. Second, by examining the role played by different values, conflicting legal and moral views, and the influence of various actors, they attempt to show that the legislative silence regarding stem cell research may not necessarily be a manifestation of a legal/moral disconnection but rather a survival strategy for navigating the long and heated battle on the moral status of the embryo and the kind of treatment it deserves.


Asunto(s)
Investigaciones con Embriones/ética , Células Madre Embrionarias , Obligaciones Morales , Política , Valores Sociales , Investigación con Células Madre/ética , Argentina , Investigaciones con Embriones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos , Formulación de Políticas , Política Pública , Investigación con Células Madre/legislación & jurisprudencia
5.
Rev. saúde pública ; Rev. saúde pública;43(3): 541-547, maio-jun. 2009. tab
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | BDS, LILACS | ID: lil-513003

RESUMEN

OBJETIVO:Analisar comparativamente regulações governamentais entre países sobre pesquisa em células-tronco embrionárias. MÉTODOS:O estudo foi conduzido entre março e maio de 2008, por meio de busca eletrônica direta nas fontes oficiais sobre documentos legislativos de 25 países selecionados e confirmada, quando necessário, por consulta por e-mail a pesquisadores e autoridades desses países. RESULTADOS: Os resultados mostraram tendência a permitir a prática de pesquisas com células-tronco embrionárias, embora com rígidas restrições éticas. Dentre os países estudados, apenas Itália e Alemanha explicitamente condenam a extração de células-tronco e apenas Itália proíbe seu uso subseqüente. Decisões jurídicas brasileiras recentes são coerentes com o contexto regulatório internacional sobre pesquisa embrionária. CONCLUSÕES: A tendência observada representa a liberdade de pesquisa para a promoção do conhecimento como um bem público, reforçada pela expectativa de potencialidade terapêutica na pesquisa com células-tronco embrionárias para o tratamento e cura de doenças sem qualquer possibilidade de assistência médica.


OBJECTIVE:To comparatively analyze governmental regulations on embryonic stem cell research among countries. METHODS: The study was performed between March and May 2008, using a direct electronic search through official databases of legislative documents from 25 selected countries, confirmed by email consultation with researchers and authorities from these countries, when necessary. RESULTS: Results showed a trend to allow the practice of embryonic stem cell research, though with strict ethical restrictions. Among the countries analyzed, only Italy and Germany explicitly condemned the extraction of stem cells and only Italy prohibits their subsequent use. Recent judicial decisions in Brazil are in accordance with the international regulatory context of embryo research. CONCLUSIONS: The trend observed represents freedom of research to promote knowledge as a public good, emphasized by the expectation of therapeutic potentiality of embryonic stem cell research to treat and cure diseases without any medical care.


OBJETIVO: Analizar comparativamente regulaciones gubernamentales entre países sobre pesquisa en células madre embrionarias. MÉTODOS:El estudio fue conducido entre marzo y mayo de 2008, por medio de búsqueda electrónica directa en las fuentes oficiales sobre documentos legislativos de 25 países seleccionados y confirmada, cuando era necesario, por consulta por e-mail a investigadores y autoridades de esos países. RESULTADOS:Los resultados mostraron tendencia a permitir la práctica de pesquisas con células madre embrionarias, a pesar de que con rígidas restricciones éticas. Entre los países estudiados, apenas Italia y Alemania explícitamente condenan la extracción de células madre coherentes con el contexto regulatorio internacional sobre pesquisa embrionaria. CONCLUSIONES: La tendencia observada representa la libertad de pesquisa para la promoción del conocimiento como un bien público, reforzada por la expectativa de potencialidad terapéutica en la pesquisa con células madre embrionarias para el tratamiento y cura de enfermedades sin cualquier posibilidad de asistencia médica.


Asunto(s)
Humanos , Investigaciones con Embriones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Células Madre Embrionarias , Internacionalidad , Investigaciones con Embriones
6.
Rev Saude Publica ; 43(3): 541-7, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés, Portugués | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19377751

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To comparatively analyze governmental regulations on embryonic stem cell research among countries. METHODS: The study was performed between March and May 2008, using a direct electronic search through official databases of legislative documents from 25 selected countries, confirmed by email consultation with researchers and authorities from these countries, when necessary. RESULTS: Results showed a trend to allow the practice of embryonic stem cell research, though with strict ethical restrictions. Among the countries analyzed, only Italy and Germany explicitly condemned the extraction of stem cells and only Italy prohibits their subsequent use. Recent judicial decisions in Brazil are in accordance with the international regulatory context of embryo research. CONCLUSIONS: The trend observed represents freedom of research to promote knowledge as a public good, emphasized by the expectation of therapeutic potentiality of embryonic stem cell research to treat and cure diseases without any medical care.


Asunto(s)
Investigaciones con Embriones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Células Madre Embrionarias , Internacionalidad , Investigaciones con Embriones/ética , Humanos
8.
Stem Cell Rev Rep ; 5(2): 123-9, 2009 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19225912

RESUMEN

A bill allowing researches with human embryonic stem cells has been approved by the Brazilian Congress, originally in 2005 and definitively by the Supreme Court in 2008. However, several years before, investigations in Brazil with adult stem cells in vitro in animal models as well as clinical trials, were started and are currently underway. Here, we will summarize the main findings and the challenges of going from bench to bed, focusing on heart, diabetes, cancer, craniofacial, and neuromuscular disorders. We also call attention to the importance of publishing negative results on experimental trials in scientific journals and websites. They are of great value to investigators in the field and may avoid the repeating of unsuccessful experiments. In addition, they could be referred to patients seeking information, aiming to protect them against financial and psychological harm.


Asunto(s)
Investigaciones con Embriones , Células Madre , Animales , Brasil , Investigaciones con Embriones/economía , Investigaciones con Embriones/ética , Investigaciones con Embriones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Humanos
11.
Dev World Bioeth ; 8(2): 138-50, 2008 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19143090

RESUMEN

Given its intimate relationship with the human body and its environment, biotechnology innovation, and more particularly stem cell research innovations as a part thereof, implicate diverse social and moral/ethical issues. This paper explores some of the most important and controversial moral concerns raised by human embryonic stem cell research (and the closely associated field of cloning), focusing on concerns relating to the wellbeing of the embryo and the wellbeing of society (the collective). It then considers how and whether these concerns are dealt with in regulatory instruments in Argentina, a southern developing country, examining in particular whether the values underlying these concerns have been translated into practical and effective rules reflective of the primary moral positions advanced. It concludes that Argentina's current state of stem cell research governance fails to consistently reflect the moral positions that have formed and is inadequate given Argentina's activity in this field.


Asunto(s)
Biotecnología/ética , Biotecnología/legislación & jurisprudencia , Países en Desarrollo , Investigaciones con Embriones/ética , Investigaciones con Embriones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Células Madre Embrionarias , Argentina , Clonación de Organismos/ética , Clonación de Organismos/legislación & jurisprudencia , Ética en Investigación , Humanos , Principios Morales
19.
Cell ; 124(6): 1107-9, 2006 Mar 24.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-16563999

RESUMEN

It has been one year since Brazil passed a law enabling scientists to work with human embryonic stem cells and to derive new stem cell lines from human embryos. But several major hurdles have put human embryonic stem cell research on hold.


Asunto(s)
Investigaciones con Embriones/legislación & jurisprudencia , Células Madre , Brasil , Humanos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA