Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 1.651
5.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 152, 2024 May 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698314

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Esophageal squamous cell neoplasia (ESCN) is predominant in Asia. Endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) have both been recommended worldwide, however the application of endoscopic radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treatment of early superficial ESCN remains inconclusive. We conducted a meta-analysis to study the effectiveness of RFA for early superficial ESCN. METHODS: Three major bibliographic databases were reviewed for the enrollment of case series and cohort trials prior to August 23, 2023. We included adults diagnosed with early superficial ESCN who had been receiving endoscopic RFA or ESD if the treatments were available. Our focus was on the 12-month histological complete response rate (CR) and 3-month histological CR, as well as the acute and late postoperative adverse events (AEs) rate during the at follow-up periods. RESULTS: Nine studies were enrolled for qualitative synthesis of narrative review, with eight trials involving a total of 447 participants for analysis. The pooled 12-month and 3-month histological CR were 0.83 (95% CI, 0.59-0.94, I2 = 80%) and 0.74 (95% CI, 0.67-0.80, I2 = 0%), respectively. As for safety, the acute and late postoperative AEs were 0.11 (95% CI, 0.05-0.26, I2 = 68%) and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.14-0.26, I2 = 0%), respectively. In subgroup analysis, the incidence of bleeding, laceration and perforation after endoscopic RFA showed 0.06, 0.06 and 0.02, respectively. When compared with ESD, RFA showed lower acute AEs and late AEs without any obvious significance. CONCLUSIONS: For early superficial ESCN, endoscopic RFA achieved both higher 12-month complete remission and late complication postoperatively when compared to 3-month histological CR and acute AEs separately, while the stricture was encountered most commonly. The choice between endoscopic RFA and ESD remains inconclusive.


Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Radiofrequency Ablation , Humans , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Radiofrequency Ablation/adverse effects , Radiofrequency Ablation/methods , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Treatment Outcome
6.
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol ; 150(5): 248, 2024 May 09.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38724804

INTRODUCTION: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is a preferred treatment option for superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (SESCC). However, only few studies compared long-term survival outcomes of ESD with surgery, especially for T1b SESCC. This study compared the overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DSS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and complication rates of both, to evaluate the value of ESD in patients with T1b SESCC. METHODS: We reviewed patients who underwent ESD (n = 47) or surgery (n = 73) for T1b SESCC at Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University of Chinese Medicine from 2009 to 2021. To increase the precision of our results interpretation, subgroups were analyzed according to the depth of tumor invasion and elderly people. RESULTS: In the ESD and surgery groups, the overall mortality rates were 0/100 and 12.3/100 person years, incidence rates of recurrence were 2.13/100 and 11/100 person years, respectively. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis revealed no significant different in OS, DSS and RFS. Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) and depth of submucosal invasion were identified as risk factors for cancer recurrence in multivariate analysis. For elderly people, no significant differences were found in OS, DSS and RFS between different treatments. CONCLUSION: ESD are related to lower complication rates and shorter hospital stay than surgery in long-term outcomes for patients with pT1b SESCC. But in pT1b-SM2 patients, we still need long-term follow-up.


Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Female , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Aged , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/mortality , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/pathology , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/surgery , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local/epidemiology , Neoplasm Staging , Esophagectomy/methods , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Survival Rate
8.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 170, 2024 May 17.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38760726

BACKGROUND: Low grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) and high grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) are potential precancerous lesion of gastric neoplasms. Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the first option for the treatment of precancerous lesion and early gastric cancer (EGC). Traction is an effective method to improve efficiency, and reduce complications during ESD. In this study, we shared a useful traction method using the clip-and-snare method with a pre-looping technique (CSM-PLT) for precancerous lesion and EGC. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients received ESD combined with CSM-PLT or conventional ESD from June 2018 to December 2021 in Shenzhen People's hospital. The primary outcome was resection speed. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were enrolled in ESD combined with CSM-PLT group and sixty-five patients in conventional ESD group respectively. Baseline characteristics were comparable among two groups (P>0.05). There were no significant differences in terms of R0 resection rate, en bloc resection rate (97.6% vs. 98.5%, P = 1.000 and 97.6% vs. 96.9%, P = 1.000, respectively), operation costs (933.7 (644.1-1102.4) dollars vs. 814.7 (614.6-988.3) dollars, P = 0.107), and hospital stays (8.0 ± 3.1 days vs. 7.3 ± 3.2 days, P = 0.236). In addition, no significant difference was observed with respect to complications (P>0.05). However, the resection speed of ESD combined with CSM-PLT was faster than that of conventional ESD (11.3 (9.4-14.9) mm2/min vs. 8.0 (5.8-10.9) mm2/min, P < 0.001), particularly lesions located in anterior wall and lesser curvature. In addition, the association between ESD combined with CSM-PLT and resection speed was still supported after propensity matching scores (PMS). CONCLUSIONS: CSM-PLT can help to improve ESD efficiency without reducing the en bloc resection rate or increasing the incidence of complications.


Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Precancerous Conditions , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Male , Retrospective Studies , Female , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Middle Aged , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects , Precancerous Conditions/surgery , Precancerous Conditions/pathology , Aged , Treatment Outcome , Operative Time , Carcinoma in Situ/surgery , Carcinoma in Situ/pathology
9.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 24(1): 164, 2024 May 14.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745162

BACKGROUND: The validity of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) in older individuals with comorbidities remains unclear. Therefore, this study evaluated the safety and efficacy of ESD and additional treatment for ESCC in older adult patients. METHODS: The clinicopathological characteristics and clinical outcomes of 398 consecutive older adult patients (≥ 65 years) with 505 lesions who underwent ESD for ESCC at the Hiroshima University Hospital between September 2007 and December 2019 were retrospectively evaluated. Additionally, the prognoses of 381 patients who were followed up for > 3 years were assessed. RESULTS: The mean patient age and procedure time were 73.1 ± 5.8 years and 77.1 ± 43.5 min, respectively. The histological en bloc resection rate was 98% (496/505). Postoperative stenosis, perforation, pneumonia, and delayed bleeding were conservatively treated in 82 (16%), 19 (4%), 15 (3%), and 5 (1%) patients, respectively. The 5-year overall and disease-specific survival rates were 78.9% and 98.0%, respectively (mean follow-up time: 71.1 ± 37.3 months). Multivariate analysis showed that age and the American Society of Anesthesiologists classification of physical status class ≥III (hazard ratio: 1.27; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-1.59, p = 0.0392) were independently associated with overall survival. A significantly lower overall survival rate was observed in the high-risk follow-up group than in the low-risk follow-up and high-risk additional treatment groups (p < 0.01). However, no significant difference in disease-specific survival was observed among the three groups. CONCLUSIONS: ESD is safe for ESCC treatment in patients aged ≥ 65 years. However, additional treatments should be considered based on the patient's general condition.


Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Postoperative Complications , Humans , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Aged , Male , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Female , Retrospective Studies , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/mortality , Prognosis , Postoperative Complications/epidemiology , Postoperative Complications/etiology , Age Factors , Treatment Outcome , Aged, 80 and over , Survival Rate
10.
Sci Rep ; 14(1): 10060, 2024 05 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38698246

This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficiency of hybrid endoscopic submucosal dissection (H-ESD) using a newly developed ALL IN ONE (AIO) snare. This was a matched control study in a porcine model. Five paired simulated stomach lesions 2-2.5 cm in size were removed by H-ESD using an AIO snare or conventional ESD (C-ESD) using an endoscopic knife. The outcomes of the two procedures were compared, including en-bloc resection rates, procedure times, intraprocedural bleeding volumes, muscular injuries, perforations, thicknesses of the submucosal layer in resected specimens, and stomach defects. All simulated lesions were resected en-bloc. Specimens resected by H-ESD and C-ESD were similar in size (7.68 ± 2.92 vs. 8.42 ± 2.42 cm2; P = 0.676). H-ESD required a significantly shorter procedure time (13.39 ± 3.78 vs. 25.99 ± 4.52 min; P = 0.031) and submucosal dissection time (3.99 ± 1.73 vs. 13.1 ± 4.58 min; P = 0.003) versus C-ESD; H-ESD also yielded a faster dissection speed (241.37 ± 156.84 vs. 68.56 ± 28.53 mm2/min; P = 0.042) and caused fewer intraprocedural bleeding events (0.40 ± 0.55 vs. 3.40 ± 1.95 times/per lesion; P = 0.016) than C-ESD. The thicknesses of the submucosal layer of the resected specimen (1190.98 ± 134.07 vs. 1055.90 ± 151.76 µm; P = 0.174) and the residual submucosal layer of the stomach defect (1607.94 ± 1026.74 vs. 985.98 ± 445.58 µm; P = 0.249) were similar with both procedures. The AIO snare is a safe and effective device for H-ESD and improves the treatment outcomes of gastric lesions by shortening the procedure time.


Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Gastric Mucosa , Animals , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/instrumentation , Swine , Gastric Mucosa/surgery , Gastroscopy/methods , Operative Time , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach/surgery , Models, Animal
12.
Cancer Med ; 13(9): e7242, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38733176

BACKGROUND AND AIM: Following treatment of superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), surveillance for a second primary malignancy (SPM) is necessary. However, detailed evidence regarding the timing and prognosis of SPMs is insufficient. We aimed to clarify the details of SPMs and their effects on patient outcomes. METHODS: This retrospective, multicenter study involved 11 hospitals. Patients with superficial ESCC curatively resected using endoscopic submucosal dissection between May 2005 and December 2012, were included in this study. RESULTS: The 5-year survival rate of 187 patients was 92.6% during a median follow-up duration of 96.8 months. Thirty-one patients died, 14 of whom died of SPMs. Compared to patients with SPMs detectable by esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), patients with SPMs detectable only by modalities other than EGD had a significantly higher mortality rate (p < 0.001). Patients with second primary lung cancer (LC) had a high mortality rate (56.3%). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that multiple Lugol-voiding lesions (LVLs) tended to be associated with SPMs (p = 0.077, hazard ratio [HR] 4.43, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.91-6.50), and metachronous ESCC was an independent risk factor for the incidence of second primary LC (p = 0.037, HR 3.51, 95% CI: 1.08-11.41). CONCLUSIONS: SPMs that cannot be detected by EGD, such as LC, must be considered after the curative resection of ESCC. We suggest strict screening by both EGD and computed tomography for patients with multiple LVLs or metachronous ESCC to detect SPMs in their early stages.


Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Neoplasms , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma , Lung Neoplasms , Neoplasms, Second Primary , Humans , Male , Female , Aged , Middle Aged , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/mortality , Esophageal Neoplasms/pathology , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/surgery , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/mortality , Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma/pathology , Retrospective Studies , Incidence , Lung Neoplasms/surgery , Lung Neoplasms/mortality , Lung Neoplasms/pathology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/epidemiology , Neoplasms, Second Primary/mortality , Neoplasms, Second Primary/pathology , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/surgery , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/mortality , Carcinoma, Squamous Cell/pathology , Aged, 80 and over , Prognosis , Risk Factors
13.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 28(4): 394-401, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583889

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been recommended as the first-line treatment for early gastric cancer (EGC). However, poor visualization of the operative field increases both the procedure time and the risk of complications, especially for large and difficult lesions. We introduced a novel technique, magnetic anchor-guided ESD (MAG-ESD) and compared it with conventional ESD (C-ESD) for the treatment of large EGCs in terms of efficacy, safety, and advantages. METHODS: Patients with large EGCs who underwent MAG-ESD or C-ESD at the First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University from March 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively enrolled in this study. The patients in the MAG-ESD cohort were matched to those in the C-ESD cohort using propensity score-based matching. The operation time, submucosal dissection time, complete resection status, magnetic anchor, adverse event rate, and tumor recurrence rate were evaluated. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients who underwent MAG-ESD were ultimately matched to those who underwent C-ESD. The median operation time of MAG-ESD and C-ESD was 43 minutes (IQR, 35.2-49.5) and 50.5 minutes (IQR, 42.0-76.0), respectively, among which the submucosal dissection time was 7.6 minutes (IQR, 5.2-10.4) and 14.8 minutes (IQR, 10.8-19.6), respectively. The operation time of MAG-ESD was shorter than that of C-ESD, especially the submucosal dissection time (P < .05). There was a lower incidence of adverse events associated with MAG-ESD (P < .05) when magnetic anchors were successfully placed and retrieved. CONCLUSION: MAG-ESD is feasible, effective, safe, and simple for the treatment of large EGCs at different sites and has a high anchor success rate, which could shorten the operation time and reduce the adverse event rate.


Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Retrospective Studies , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Cohort Studies , Treatment Outcome , Neoplasm Recurrence, Local , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Magnetic Phenomena
14.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 28(4): 538-547, 2024 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38583908

BACKGROUND: With the development of endoscopic technology, endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) has been widely used in the treatment of gastrointestinal tumors. It is necessary to evaluate the depth of tumor invasion before the application of ESD. The convolution neural network (CNN) is a type of artificial intelligence that has the potential to assist in the classification of the depth of invasion in endoscopic images. This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the performance of CNN in determining the depth of invasion of gastrointestinal tumors. METHODS: A search on PubMed, Web of Science, and SinoMed was performed to collect the original publications about the use of CNN in determining the depth of invasion of gastrointestinal neoplasms. Pooled sensitivity and specificity were calculated using an exact binominal rendition of the bivariate mixed-effects regression model. I2 was used for the evaluation of heterogeneity. RESULTS: A total of 17 articles were included; the pooled sensitivity was 84% (95% CI, 0.81-0.88), specificity was 91% (95% CI, 0.85-0.94), and the area under the curve (AUC) was 0.93 (95% CI, 0.90-0.95). The performance of CNN was significantly better than that of endoscopists (AUC: 0.93 vs 0.83, respectively; P = .0005). CONCLUSION: Our review revealed that CNN is one of the most effective methods of endoscopy to evaluate the depth of invasion of early gastrointestinal tumors, which has the potential to work as a remarkable tool for clinical endoscopists to make decisions on whether the lesion is feasible for endoscopic treatment.


Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms , Humans , Artificial Intelligence , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/surgery , Gastrointestinal Neoplasms/pathology , Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal/methods , Neural Networks, Computer , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods
15.
J Nanobiotechnology ; 22(1): 143, 2024 Apr 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561800

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the current standard treatment for early-stage esophageal neoplasms. However, the postoperative esophageal stricture after extensive mucosal dissection remains a severe challenge with limited effective treatments available. In this study, we introduced a chitosan/gelatin (ChGel) sponge encapsulating the adipose mesenchymal stem cells (ADMSCs)-derived exosomes (ChGelMSC-Exo) for the prevention of esophageal stenosis after ESD in a porcine model. RESULTS: Pigs were randomly assigned into (1) ChGelMSC-Exo treatment group, (2) ChGelPBS group, and (3) the controls. Exosome treatments were applied immediately on the day after ESD as well as on day 7. Exosome components crucial for wound healing were investigated by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) and small RNA sequencing. ChGelMSC-Exo treatment significantly reduced mucosal contraction on day 21, with less fiber accumulation and inflammatory infiltration, and enhanced angiogenesis when compared with the control and ChGelPBS groups. The anti-fibrotic effects following MSC-Exo treatment were further found to be associated with the anti-inflammatory M2 polarization of the resident macrophages, especially within the M2b subset characterized by the reduced TGFß1 secretion, which sufficiently inhibited inflammation and prevented the activation of myofibroblast with less collagen production at the early stage after ESD. Moreover, the abundant expression of exosomal MFGE8 was identified to be involved in the transition of the M2b-macrophage subset through the activation of MFGE8/STAT3/Arg1 axis. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that exosomal MFGE8 significantly promotes the polarization of the M2b-macrophage subset, consequently reducing collagen deposition. These findings suggest a promising potential for MSC-Exo therapy in preventing the development of esophageal stricture after near-circumferential ESD.


Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Stenosis , Exosomes , Mesenchymal Stem Cells , Swine , Animals , Esophageal Stenosis/etiology , Esophageal Stenosis/prevention & control , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Chromatography, Liquid , Tandem Mass Spectrometry , Collagen
16.
J Med Case Rep ; 18(1): 139, 2024 Apr 02.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38561839

INTRODUCTION: Although esophageal bronchogenic cysts are benign diseases, they may be accompanied by serious complications and have the possibility of recurrence. Therefore, once confirmed, it is necessary to treat the esophagobronchial cyst when the contraindication is excluded. Endoscopic treatment is usually used for lesions with small diameter and shallow origin, and has the advantages of small surgical trauma and risk, which can reduce the psychological burden of patients to a certain extent, help them to recover quickly, and lower hospital costs. CASE PRESENTATION: Case 1 is a 54-year-old Han Chinese man admitted to our hospital who complained of difficulty swallowing in the past 6 months. Case 2 is a 41-year-old Han Chinese man who was hospitalized in the past 3 months due to chest discomfort. Endoscopic ultrasound revealed a hypoechoic cystic lesion arising from the muscularis propria. Submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection was performed using a dual knife, and a cystic mass was observed between the mucosa and the muscular layers of the esophagus. On locating the cyst, an incision was made on the oral side of the lesion for evacuation. The cyst wall was excised using endoscopic argon plasma coagulation. We successfully removed the esophageal bronchogenic cyst lesion in the intrinsic muscle layer using submucosal tunneling endoscopic resection. CONCLUSION: Esophageal bronchogenic cysts are rare in clinical practice and lack specificity in clinical manifestations. Multiple methods can be used to determine the location and nature of the lesion and ultimately determine the treatment plan. Surgical resection and endoscopic treatment are two different treatment methods, and appropriate treatment plans need to be selected on the basis of the origin layer, size, and relationship with the esophagus of the lesion to reduce complications and improve prognosis.


Bronchogenic Cyst , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Esophageal Neoplasms , Male , Humans , Middle Aged , Adult , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Bronchogenic Cyst/diagnostic imaging , Bronchogenic Cyst/surgery , Esophageal Neoplasms/surgery , Endosonography
17.
World J Gastroenterol ; 30(9): 1257-1260, 2024 Mar 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38577178

The increasing popularity of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) as a treatment for early gastric cancer has highlighted the importance of quality assessment in achieving curative resections. This article emphasizes the significance of evaluating ESD quality, not only for curative cases but also for non-curative ones. Postoperative assessment relies on the endoscopic curability (eCura) classification, but management strategies for eCuraC-1 tumour with a positive horizontal margin are unclear. Current research primarily focuses on comparing additional surgical procedures in high-risk patients, while studies specifically targeting eCuraC-1 patients are limited. Exploring management strategies and follow-up outcomes for such cases could provide valuable insights. Furthermore, the application of molecular imaging using near-infrared fluorescent tracers holds promise for precise tumour diagnosis and navigation, potentially impacting the management of early-stage gastric cancer patients. Advancing research in these areas is essential for improving the overall efficacy of endoscopic techniques and refining treatment indications.


Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Treatment Outcome , Retrospective Studies , Gastric Mucosa/diagnostic imaging , Gastric Mucosa/surgery , Gastric Mucosa/pathology
18.
Zhonghua Zhong Liu Za Zhi ; 46(4): 326-334, 2024 Apr 23.
Article Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38644268

Objective: To investigate the endoscopic combined serological diagnosis strategy for G1 and G2 gastric neuroendocrine neoplasms (G-NENs), and to evaluate the safety, short-term, and long-term efficacy of two endoscopic treatment procedures: endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) and endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods: This study retrospectively analyzed the clinical data of 100 consecutive patients with G-NENs who were hospitalized at the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 2011 to October 2023. These patients underwent endoscopic treatment, and propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare clinicopathological characteristics, as well as short-term and long-term efficacy of lesions in the EMR group and ESD group before and after treatment. Results: Among the 100 patients with G-NENs, the median age was 54 years old. Before surgery, 29 cases underwent endoscopic combined serological examination, and 24 of them (82.2%) had abnormally elevated plasma chromogranin A. The combined diagnostic strategy for autoimmune atrophic gastritis (AIG) achieved a diagnostic accuracy of 100%(22/22). A total of 235 G-NEN lesions were included, with 84 in the ESD group and 151 in the EMR group. The median size of the lesions in the ESD group (5.0 mm) was significantly larger than that in the EMR group (2.0 mm, P<0.001). Additionally, the ESD group had significantly more lesions with pathological grade G2[23.8%(20/84) vs. 1.3%(2/151), P<0.001], infiltration depth reaching the submucosal layer [78.6%(66/84) vs. 51.0%(77/151), P<0.001], and more T2 stage compared to the EMR group[15.5%(13/84) vs. 0.7%(1/151), P<0.001]. After PSM, 49 pairs of lesions were successfully matched between the two groups. Following PSM, there were no significant differences in the en bloc resection rate [100.0%(49/49) vs. 100.0%(49/49)], complete resection rate [93.9%(46/49) vs. 100.0%(49/49)], and complication rate [0(0/49) vs. 4.1%(2/49)] between the two groups. During the follow-up period, no recurrence or distant metastasis was observed in any of the lesions in both groups. Conclusions: The combination of endoscopy and serology diagnostic strategy has the potential to enhance the accuracy of diagnosing G1 and G2 stage G-NENs and their background mucosa. Endoscopic resection surgery (EMR, ESD) is a proven and safe treatment approach for G1 and G2 stage G-NENs.


Chromogranin A , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection , Neuroendocrine Tumors , Stomach Neoplasms , Humans , Stomach Neoplasms/surgery , Stomach Neoplasms/diagnosis , Stomach Neoplasms/pathology , Stomach Neoplasms/blood , Retrospective Studies , Middle Aged , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Neuroendocrine Tumors/surgery , Neuroendocrine Tumors/diagnosis , Neuroendocrine Tumors/blood , Chromogranin A/blood , Gastritis, Atrophic/diagnosis , Gastroscopy/methods , Propensity Score , Gastric Mucosa/surgery , Gastric Mucosa/pathology , Treatment Outcome , Male , Female , Gastrins/blood
19.
Stem Cell Res Ther ; 15(1): 117, 2024 Apr 23.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38654373

BACKGROUND: The detection rate of superficial non-ampullary duodenal epithelial tumors (SNADETs) has recently been increasing. Large tumors may contain malignant lesions and early therapeutic intervention is recommended. Endoscopic mucosal dissection (ESD) is considered a feasible treatment modality, however, the anatomical and physiological characteristics of the duodenum create a risk of postoperative perforation after ESD. METHODS: To explore whether myoblast sheet transplantation could prevent delayed perforation after ESD, a first-in-human (FIH) clinical trial of laparoscopic autologous myoblast sheet transplantation after duodenal ESD was launched. Autologous myoblast sheets fabricated from muscle tissue obtained seven weeks before ESD were transplanted laparoscopically onto the serous side of the ESD. The primary endpoints were the onset of peritonitis due to delayed perforation within three days after surgery and all adverse events during the follow-up period. RESULTS: Three patients with SNADETs ≥ 20 mm in size underwent transplantation of a myoblast sheet onto the serous side of the duodenum after ESD. In case 1, The patient's postoperative course was uneventful. Endoscopy and abdominal computed tomography revealed no signs of delayed perforation. Despite incomplete mucosal closure in case 2, and multiple micro perforations during ESD in case 3, cell sheet transplantation could prevent the postoperative massive perforation after ESD, and endoscopy on day 49 after transplantation revealed no stenosis. CONCLUSIONS: This clinical trial showed the safety, efficacy, and procedural operability of this novel regenerative medicine approach involving transplanting an autologous myoblast sheet laparoscopically onto the serosa after ESD in cases with a high risk of delayed perforation. This result indicates the potential application of cell sheet medicine in treating various abdominal organs and conditions with minimal invasiveness in the future. TRIAL REGISTRATION: jRCT, jRCT2073210094. Registered November 8 2021, https://jrct.niph.go.jp/latest-detail/jRCT2073210094 .


Laparoscopy , Myoblasts , Transplantation, Autologous , Humans , Laparoscopy/methods , Laparoscopy/adverse effects , Male , Female , Myoblasts/transplantation , Transplantation, Autologous/methods , Middle Aged , Duodenum , Aged , Intestinal Mucosa , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/adverse effects , Endoscopic Mucosal Resection/methods , Duodenal Neoplasms/surgery , Intestinal Perforation/etiology
...