Role of pre-operative endovascular embolization of a giant sacrococcygeal teratoma in neonate: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Giant sacrococcygeal teratomas (SCTs) are at risk of perinatal morbidity and mortality due to their high vascularity. Pre-operative embolization of the feeding arteries, prior to complete surgical resection, may assist in minimizing the intraoperative blood loss by occluding these feeding arteries. CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case of a highly vascular giant SCT in a neonate, which was successfully embolized through an endovascular approach prior to surgery. The femoral artery approach was chosen, with access established using a Micropuncture introducer as a sheath. Embolization was performed using a combination of microcoils, Gelfoam slurry, and polyvinyl alcohol particles. The patient developed femoral artery spasm post-procedure, which resolved with the application of a glyceryl trinitrate patch. CONCLUSIONS: Performing pre-operative endovascular embolization on a giant sacrococcygeal teratoma presents particular challenges, primarily due to the difficulty in assessing small vessels and the potential complications associated with this procedure. Nevertheless, this technique proves exceptionally valuable in helping the surgeon minimize blood loss during surgery, thereby reducing the risks of morbidity and mortality. Comprehensive planning for the embolization procedure is essential, encompassing the identification of potential vascular access points and alternatives, along with careful selection of the appropriate catheter.

Feasibility, safety, and efficacy of endovascular treatment of anterior cranial fossa dural arteriovenous fistulas: a systematic review and meta-analysis with a subanalysis for Onyx.

Dural Arteriovenous Fistulas (dAVFs) of the anterior cranial fossa (ACF) are uncommon but carry a high risk of hemorrhage and pose substantial treatment challenges. Recent advancements in endovascular treatment (EVT), including the introduction of novel liquid embolic agents, have markedly bolstered EVT's role in managing ACF-dAVFs, with notable series published in the last five years. We aimed to assess the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of EVT for ACF-dAVFs. We searched Medline, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases following PRISMA guidelines. Eligible studies included those with ≥ 5 patients undergoing embolization of ACF-dAVFs, detailing both angiographic and clinical outcomes. We used single proportion analysis with 95% confidence intervals under a random-effects model, I2 to assess heterogeneity, and Baujat and sensitivity analysis to address high heterogeneity. Publication bias was assessed by funnel-plot analysis and Egger's test. Outcomes included complete occlusion following embolization, unsuccessful endovascular embolization attempts, incomplete occlusion following embolization, symptom resolution or clinical improvement following embolization, recurrence; procedure-related complications, morbidity, and mortality. Additionally, a subanalysis for studies exclusively utilizing Onyx™ embolic system was done. Eighteen studies comprising 231 ACF-dAVF were included. Unsuccessful endovascular embolization attempts rate was 2%. Complete occlusion rate was 85%, with 4% of complications. Incomplete occlusion rate was 10%. Successfully embolized patients experienced either symptom resolution or clinical improvement in 94% of cases. Morbidity and mortality rates were 1% and 0%, respectively. Onyx subanalyses showed an overall rate of 0% for unsuccessful attempts, 95% for complete occlusion, and 5% for incomplete occlusion. Symptom resolution or clinical improvement was 98% and recurrence rate was 0%. EVT for ACF-dAVF is highly feasible, effective, and safe, with a low rate of complications, morbidity, and mortality. The subanalyses focusing on Onyx embolizations revealed superior efficacy and safety outcomes compared to the findings of the primary analyses involving all included studies.

Noncontrast CT Selected Thrombectomy vs Medical Management for Late-Window Anterior Large Vessel Occlusion.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is uncertainty whether patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO) presenting in the late 6-hour to 24-hour time window can be selected for endovascular therapy (EVT) by noncontrast CT (NCCT) and CT angiography (CTA) for LVO detection. We evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients selected for EVT by NCCT compared with those medically managed in the extended time window. METHODS: This multinational cohort study was conducted at 66 sites across 10 countries. Consecutive patients with proximal anterior LVO stroke selected for EVT by NCCT or medically managed and presenting within 6-24 hours of time last seen well (TSLW) from January 2014 to May 2022 were included. The primary end point was the 90-day ordinal shift in the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score. Inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) and multivariable methods were used. RESULTS: Of 5,098 patients screened, 839 patients were included, with a median (interquartile range) age of 75 (64-83) years; 455 (54.2%) were women. There were 616 patients selected to undergo EVT by NCCT (73.4%) and 223 (26.6%) who were medically managed. In IPTW analyses, there was a more favorable 90-day ordinal mRS shift in patients selected by NCCT to EVT vs those who were medically managed (odds ratio [OR] 1.99, 95% CI 1.53-2.59; p < 0.001). There were higher rates of 90-day functional independence (mRS 0-2) in the EVT group (40.1% vs 18.4%, OR 3.31, 95% CI 2.11-5.20; p < 0.001). sICH was nonsignificantly higher in the EVT group (8.5% vs 1.4%, OR 3.77, 95% CI 0.72-19.7, p = 0.12). Mortality at 90 days was lower in the EVT vs MM group (23.9% vs 32.3%, OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.45-0.83, p = 0.002). DISCUSSION: In patients with proximal anterior LVO in the extended time window, there was a lower rate of disability and mortality in patients selected with NCCT and CTA to EVT compared with those who were medically managed. These findings support the use of NCCT as a simpler and more inclusive approach to patient selection in the extended window. TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION: This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT04096248. CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE: This study provides Class III evidence that for patients with proximal anterior circulation occlusion presenting with ischemic stroke from 6 to 24 hours, compared with medical management, those undergoing thrombectomy based on NCCT have reduced disability and mortality at 90 days.

Management of Incidental Carotid Cave Aneurysm.

BACKGROUND: Incidental diagnosis of saccular aneurysms is more common with the advent of imaging techniques. Because of the severe morbidity and mortality that they can cause, treatment is chased for them, either microsurgical treatment or endovascular, even when they are diagnosed incidentally. Carotid cave aneurysms are rare, and they seem to have a more benign course compared to other intracranial aneurysms, probably related to the physical enveloping effect of the surrounding structures. Yet, their microsurgical treatment is a serious challenge technically for the neurosurgeon, with its severe morbidity and mortality for the patient. Endovascular techniques have their risks, too. PURPOSE: In this paper, we analyzed and presented our series of incidentally diagnosed carotid cave aneurysms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The age, gender of patients, the size, laterality, and MR angiographic follow-up of aneurysms were reported. Their clinical results were noted. RESULTS: Fifty-six patients who had incidentally been diagnosed with 59 carotid cave aneurysms were followed up. No patient was microsurgically treated, but 15 patients had endovascular treatment for 15 aneurysms. The mean size of 15 treated aneurysms was 4.6 ± 2.1 (range = 2-10) mm, and it was 3.0 ± 1.5 (range = 1.7-10) mm for the untreated aneurysms (n = 44). There was no significant difference between the follow-up times of the treated and untreated groups (P = 0.487). The median follow-up of 59 aneurysms in 56 patients was 52 (mean = 49.6 ± 27.9, range = 1-124) months, with a total follow-up of 244 aneurysm years. None of the patients had subarachnoid hemorrhage related to carotid cave aneurysms during follow-up, and none of the aneurysms had shown growth. Two patients who had endovascular treatment had ischemic complications with minor neurologic deficits. CONCLUSION: Follow-up can be a reasonable option for the incidental aneurysms that are located and confined to the carotid cave. Additionally, TOF might be a reliable method for follow-up imaging of carotid cave aneurysms.

Advances in the Endovascular Management of Cerebrovascular Disease.

The field of endovascular neurosurgery has experienced remarkable progress over the last few decades. Endovascular treatments have continued to gain traction as the advancement of technology, technique, and procedural safety has allowed for the expansion of treatment indications of various cerebrovascular pathologies. Interventions such as the coiling of intracranial aneurysms, carotid artery stenting, mechanical thrombectomy in the setting of ischemic stroke, and endovascular embolization of arteriovenous malformations have all seen transformations in their safety and efficacy, expanding the scope of endovascularly treatable conditions and offering new hope to patients who may have otherwise not been candidates for surgical intervention. Despite this notable progress, challenges persist, including complications associated with device deployment and questions regarding long-term outcomes. This article explores the advancements in endovascular neurosurgical techniques, highlighting the impact on patient care, outcomes, and the evolution of traditional surgical methods.

Global hyperperfusion after successful endovascular thrombectomy is linked to worse outcome in acute ischemic stroke.

Patients with stroke may develop hyperperfusion after a successful endovascular thrombectomy (EVT). However, the relationship between post-EVT hyperperfusion and clinical outcomes remains unclear and requires further clarification. We reviewed consecutive patients with anterior circulation occlusion who were successfully recanalized with EVT. Based on post-EVT arterial spin-labeling images, hyperperfusion was categorized as follows: global hyperperfusion (GHP), increased cerebral blood flow (CBF) in ≥ 50% of the culprit vessel territory; focal hyperperfusion (FHP), increased CBF in < 50% of the culprit vessel territory; no hyperperfusion (NHP), no discernible CBF increase. Factors associated with hyperperfusion were assessed, and clinical outcomes were compared among patients under different hyperperfusion categories. Among 131 patients, 25 and 40 patients developed GHP and FHP, respectively. Compared to other groups, the GHP group had worse National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (GHP vs. NHP/FHP, 18.1 ± 7.4 vs. 12.3 ± 6.0; p < 0.001), a larger post-EVT infarct volume (98.9 [42.3-132.7] vs. 13.5 [5.0-34.1] mL; p < 0.001), and a worse 90-day outcome (modified Rankin Scale, 3 [1-4] vs. 2 [0-3]; p = 0.030). GHP was independently associated with infarct volume (B = 0.532, standard error = 0.163, p = 0.001), and infarct volume was a major mediator of the association of GHP with unfavorable outcomes (total effect: ß = 0.176, p = 0.034; direct effect: ß = 0.045, p = 0.64; indirect effect: ß = 0.132, p = 0.017). Patients presenting with post-EVT GHP had poorer neurological prognosis, which is likely mediated by a large infarct volume.

Successful Endovascular Microembolization for Post-Traumatic High-Flow Priapism: A Case Report.

BACKGROUND High-flow (non-ischemic) priapism is a rare urological condition usually related to blind trauma to the penis or perineum causing an arterial-lacunar fistula. It can be treated conservatively, but in some cases when conservative treatment fails, the interventional approach is indicated. In the past, only surgical treatment was available, which was associated with a significant risk of complications. Endovascular techniques use a novel approach and offer clinical benefits for the patient. CASE REPORT A 51-year-old man was admitted to the hospital after referral from the urology department with high-flow priapism related to blunt trauma. Angio-computed tomography showed extravasation of contrast medium to the corpus cavernosum, and angiography revealed a fistula between the distal segment of the left internal pudendal artery and corpora cavernosa. A successful endovascular microembolization of the arterial-lacunar fistula with the use of microcoils was performed. The postprocedural period was uneventful and the patient was discharged. Despite incomplete angiographic follow-up at 6 months, the initial symptoms were fully resolved with the absence of any erectile dysfunction and no recurrence of priapism occurred. CONCLUSIONS Post-traumatic high-flow priapism can be safely and effectively treated by endovascular means. Microembolization has proven to be successful and beneficial to preserve sexual functions.

Surgery versus endovascular treatment for spinal dural arteriovenous fistulas: a multicenter experience and systematic literature review.

Surgery and endovascular therapy are the primary treatment options for spinal dural arteriovenous fistula (SDAVF). Due to the absence of a consensus regarding which therapy yields a superior outcome, we conducted a comparative analysis of the surgical and endovascular treatment of SDAVF through a multicenter case series and a systematic literature review. Patients with SDAVF, surgically or endovascularly treated at four neurosurgical centers from January 2001 to December 2021, were included in this study. Level of SDAVF, primary treatment modality, baseline and post-procedural neurological status were collected. The primary outcomes were failure, complication rates, and a newly introduced parameter named as therapeutic delay. A systematic review of the literature was performed according to PRISMA-P guidelines. The systematic review identified 511 papers, of which 18 were eligible for analysis, for a total of 814 patients, predominantly male (72%) with a median age of 61 and mainly thoracic SDAVFs (65%). The failure rate was significantly higher for endovascular therapy (20%) compared to surgery (4%) (p < 0.01). Neurological complications were generally rare, with similar rates among the two groups (endovascular 2.9%; surgery 2.6%). Endovascular treatment showed a statistically significantly higher rate of persistent neurological complications than surgical treatment (2.9% versus 0.2%; p < 0.01). Both treatments showed similar rates of clinical improvement based on Aminoff Logue scale score. The multicenter, retrospective study involved 131 patients. The thoracic region was the most frequent location (58%), followed by lumbar (37%). Paraparesis (45%) and back pain (41%) were the most common presenting symptoms, followed by bladder dysfunction (34%) and sensory disturbances (21%). The mean clinical follow-up was 21 months, with all patients followed for at least 12 months. No statistically significant differences were found in demographic and clinical data, lesion characteristics, or outcomes between the two treatment groups. Median pre-treatment Aminoff-Logue score was 2.6, decreasing to 1.4 post-treatment with both treatments. The mean therapeutic delay for surgery and endovascular treatment showed no statistically significant difference. Surgical treatment demonstrated significantly lower failure rates (5% vs. 46%, p < 0.01). In the surgical group, 2 transient neurological (1 epidural hematoma, 1 CSF leak) and 3 non-neurological (3 wound infections) complications were recorded; while 2 permanent neurological (spinal infarcts), and 5 non-neurological (inguinal hematomas) were reported in the endovascular group. According to the literature review and this multicenter clinical series, surgical treatment has a significantly lower failure rate than endovascular treatment. Although the two treatments have similar complication rates, endovascular treatment seems to have a higher rate of persistent neurological complications.

Evaluation of Hemodynamic Alterations after Flow Diverter Placement using the AneurysmFlowTM tool.

Background: AneurysmFlow (Phillips Healthcare) is the flow measurement tool, utilizing an optical flow-based algorithm from DSA, lacks sufficient published studies. This study aimed to assess the significance of flow velocity changes and the Mean Aneurysm Flow Amplitude (MAFA) ratio in evaluating outcomes following flow-diverting treatments. Methods: Between June 2021 and October 2022, 41 patients with 42 aneurysms underwent FDS treatment with AneurysmFlow measu-rement at the Bach Mai Radiology Center. Results: The tool achieved a 90.5% success rate in 38 out of 42 patients. Most aneurysms (89.5%) were small to medium-sized (<10 mm), and a decrease in flow velocity post-stent deployment was ob-served in 78.9% of cases. Conversely, 21.1% showed increased flow, mainly in aneurysms smaller than 5 mm. No significant association was found between flow changes or MAFA ratio and aneurysm size characteristics. Twenty-two patients (59.5%) underwent re-examination at 6 months, revealing no correlation in MAFA ratio between completely and incompletely occluded aneurysms. Conclusions: Our current investigation, primarily centered on small and medium-sized aneurysms, did not uncover any link between quantitative flow changes assessed using the AneurysmFlow software and the occlusion status of aneurysms at the 6-month follow-up post-flow diverter treatment. Larger case series with extended follow-up imaging are necessary to further explore these findings.

Use of EndoAnchors during index endovascular aortic aneurysm repair in patients with hostile proximal aortic neck anatomy.

PURPOSE: Standard endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) is sometimes the only treatment option for patients with hostile aortic neck anatomy, but it carries an increased risk of both early and late procedure-related complications. The aim of this study was to report on single-center experience with the Heli-FX EndoAnchors (Medtronic, Santa Rosa, CA) as an adjunctive procedure to endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) for prevention and perioperative treatment of proximal neck complications in patients with hostile neck anatomy.  MATERIALS AND METHODS: A single-centre, retrospective study evaluating 24 consecutive patients treated with EndoAnchors during the index EVAR procedure between November 2018 and August 2021. EndoAnchor implantation was indicated for cases with hostile proximal aortic neck anatomy characterised by the presence of at least one of the following parameters: length of 28 mm, angle of >60°, circumferential thrombus/calcification involving ≥50%, and reverse taper. RESULTS:  Median follow-up period was 22.5 months (IQR 2-31.5 months) with no aneurysm-related death, rupture, or conversion to open surgical repair during the follow-up. The procedural success rate was 100%, with no type Ia endoleak at the completion angiography. A mean of 7 EndoAnchors was used per patient (range 4-12). There were no EndoAnchor fractures and dislocations or stent graft fabric damage due to anchor implants. Twenty-three patients (95.8%) remained free of type Ia endoleak and migration on follow-up imaging. Aneurysm sac regression was observed in 13 patients (54.1%), while in 8 patients (33.3%) the sac remained stable. Sac enlargement was present in 1 patient (4.2%) due to late type Ia endoleak. Two patients were lost to the follow-up immediately after the procedure. Between two groups of patients (sac regression versus failure to regress), the larger initial diameter of the proximal neck was the only significant independent factor associated with a lower possibility of sac regression (p= 0,021). CONCLUSIONS:  The use of EndoAnchors during the index EVAR procedure in cases with challenging aortic neck anatomy with or without perioperative type Ia endoleak was associated with good midterm results and led to sac regression in most of the patients (Tab. 4, Fig. 3, Ref. 31).

Endovascular Therapy and Outcomes Among Patients With Very Large Ischemic Core Stroke.

Importance: The association of endovascular therapy (EVT) with outcomes is unclear for patients with very low Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score (ASPECTS) within 24 hours of stroke onset. Objective: To explore the association of EVT with functional and safety outcomes among patients with ASPECTS of 0 to 2 scored with noncontrast computed tomography. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used data from an ongoing, prospective, observational, nationwide registry including all patients treated at 38 stroke centers in China with an occlusion in the internal carotid artery or M1 or M2 segment of the middle cerebral artery within 24 hours of witnessed symptom onset. Patients with ASPECTS of 0 to 2 between November 1, 2021, and February 8, 2023, were included in analysis. Data were analyzed October to November 2023. Exposures: EVT vs standard medical treatment (SMT). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was favorable functional outcome, defined as modified Rankin Scale score (mRS) of 0 to 3, at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) within 48 hours and mortality at 90 days. Results: A total of 245 patients (median [IQR] age, 71 [63-78] years; 118 [48%] women) with ASPECTS of 0 to 2 were included, of whom 111 patients (45.1%) received SMT and 135 patients (54.9%) received EVT. The EVT group had significantly greater odds of favorable functional outcome at 90 days than the SMT group (30 patients [22.2%] vs 11 patients [9.9%]; P = .01; adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 3.07 [95% CI, 1.29-7.31]; P = .01). Patients in the EVT group, compared with the SMT group, had significantly greater odds of any ICH (56 patients [41.5%] vs 16 patients [11.4%]; P < .001; aOR, 4.27 [95% CI, 2.19-8.35]; P < .001) and sICH (24 patients [17.8%] vs 1 patient [0.9%]; P < .001; aOR, 23.07 [95% CI, 2.99-177.79]; P = .003) within 48 hours. There were no differences between groups for 90-day mortality (80 patients [59.3%] vs 59 patients [53.2%]; P = .34; aOR, 1.38 [95% CI, 0.77-2.47]; P = .28). The results remained robust in the propensity score-matched analysis. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of patients with very low ASPECTS based on NCCT within 24 hours of stroke onset, those treated with EVT had higher odds of a favorable functional outcome compared with those who received SMT. Randomized clinical trials are needed to assess these findings.

Clinical outcomes of posterior fossa arteriovenous malformations: a single center experience.

BACKGROUND: Posterior fossa arterio-venous malformations (pfAVMs) are challenging lesions due to the anatomical particularities of the posterior fossa, and the high incidence of hemorrhagic presentation. The two most important goals when treating AVMs are preserving neurological function and preventing rupture, or a second hemorrhage. The aim of this study was to analyze the clinical and imaging features of pfAVMs to identify the factors that influence the prognosis of these patients. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective observational study that included patients treated at our institution with pfAVMs between January 1997 and December 2021. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included. A good modified Rankin score (mRS) was observed in 33 cases (69%) at presentation. Thirty-four patients (71%) presented with a ruptured AVM. Out of these, 19 patients (40%) had intraventricular hemorrhage. Microsurgical resection was performed in 33 cases (69%), while in the other cases, the patients opted for conservative management (7 cases, 15%), stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) (6 cases, 12%), or endovascular treatment (2 cases, 4%). Patients ≤ 30 years old were more prone to hemorrhagic presentation (OR: 5.23; 95% CI: 1.42-17.19; p = 0.024) and this remained an independent risk factor for rupture after multivariate analysis as well (OR: 4.81; 95% CI: 1.07-21.53; p = 0.040). Following multivariate analysis, the only factor independently associated with poor prognosis in the surgically treated subgroup was a poor clinical status (mRS 3-5) at admission (OR: 96.14; 95% CI: 5.15-1793.9; p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: Management of posterior fossa AVMs is challenging, and patients who present with ruptured AVMs often have a poor clinical status at admission leading to a poor prognosis. Therefore, proper and timely management of these patients is essential.

Letter to editor: Bridging the gap: robotic applications in cerebral aneurysms neurointerventions - a systematic review.

The letter critically evaluates the role of robotic applications in cerebral aneurysm neurointerventions, synthesizing a diverse array of studies to elucidate both the potential benefits and inherent limitations of this emerging technology. The review highlights the advancements in precision, efficiency, and patient outcomes facilitated by robotic platforms, while also acknowledging challenges such as the steep learning curve and the need for further research to establish long-term efficacy and cost-effectiveness. By navigating through the complexities of robotic-assisted neurosurgery, the review provides valuable insights into the transformative potential of robotics in optimizing treatment paradigms and improving patient care.

[Analysis of the effect and safety of lumen reshaping after endovascular repair of Stanford B type aortic dissection at different intervention times].

Objective: To Compare the effects and safety of lumen reshaping after thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for Stanford B type aortic dissection (AD) at different intervention times. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 189 patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection treated with TEVAR at the Affiliated Hospital of Chengde Medical College from January 2016 to December 2020.Based on the time from onset to surgery, patients were divided into an early intervention group (≤14 days, n=127) and a delayed intervention group (>14 days, n=62).The diameters of the total aorta, true lumen and false lumen at different times and planes (S1 plane: at the bifurcation of the pulmonary artery; S2 plane: at the lower edge of the left atrium; S3 plane: at the upper edge of the celiac trunk) post-surgery were compared between the two groups, and the rate of change in diameters of true and false lumens across these planes was calculated. The patients were followed until December 1st, 2023, and the median follow-up time was 45(40, 49) months. The postoperative complications and survival of the two groups were compared. Results: The early intervention group comprised 86 men and 41 women, with an average age of (58.3±10.7) years. The delayed intervention group included 41 men and 21 women, with an average age of (58.5±9.2) years. Both groups had an operation success rate of 100%. Six months post-surgery, the early intervention group had an expansion rate of the true lumen diameter at planes S2 and S3 of 40.1%(25.5%, 56.1%) and 5.3%(-2.5%, 15.8%), respectively, which was superior to the delayed intervention group's 18.5%(10.6%, 39.8%) and 1.0%(-8.2%, 9.6%) (both P<0.05).The early intervention group had a reduction rate of the false lumen diameter at planes S1, S2, and S3 of -56.2%(-61.3%, -48.8%), -70.4%(-81.8%, -56.6%), and -5.4%(-17.4%, 0.1%), respectively, better than the delayed intervention group's -44.2%(-53.7%, -38.3%), -49.0%(-57.6%, -35.8%), and -3.1%(-6.7%, 1.8%) (all P<0.05).At plane S1, the true lumen diameter of patients in both groups showed an increasing trend over 36 months post-surgery, while the false lumen diameter showed a decreasing trend (both P<0.05).At plane S2, the true lumen diameter of patients in the early intervention group exhibited an increasing trend over 36 months post-surgery, and the false lumen diameter exhibited a decreasing trend (both P<0.05).At plane S3, the total aortic diameter of patients in the delayed intervention group showed a slight increasing trend over 36 months post-surgery (P<0.05).The overall survival time were 45.0 months (95%CI: 42.9-47.1) for patients in the early intervention group and 46.0 months (95%CI: 43.5-48.5) for those in the delayed intervention group, with no statistically significant difference observed (P>0.05).The incidence rates of complications such as aortic rupture, retrograde Type A dissection, new distal endograft dissection, endoleak, paraplegia, and others showed no statistically significant difference between the two groups (all P>0.05), with no cases of stent migration or deformation observed. Conclusion: Early intervention for Stanford type B aortic dissection provides a better aortic remodeling outcome than delayed intervention, with similar safety.