Reconstruction with free jejunal flap in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa complicated with hypopharyngeal cancer: A case report.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) encompasses a range of rare genetic dermatological conditions characterized by mucocutaneous fragility and a predisposition to blister formation, often triggered by minimal trauma. Blisters in the pharynx and esophagus are well-documented, particularly in dystrophic EB (DEB). However, there have been few reports of mucocutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) in the head and neck region, for which surgery is usually avoided. This report presents the first case of free jejunal flap reconstruction after total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy for hypopharyngeal cancer in a 57-year-old patient with DEB. The patient with a known diagnosis of DEB had a history of SCC of the left hand and esophageal dilatation for esophageal stricture. PET-CT imaging during examination of systemic metastases associated with the left-hand SCC revealed abnormal accumulation in the hypopharynx, which was confirmed as SCC by biopsy. Total pharyngolaryngoesophagectomy was performed, followed by reconstruction of the defect using a free jejunal flap. A segment of the jejunum, approximately 15 cm in length, was transplanted with multiple vascular pedicles. The patient made an uneventful recovery postoperatively and was able to continue oral intake 15 months later with no complications and no recurrence of SCC in the head and neck region. While cutaneous SCC is common in DEB, extracutaneous SCC is relatively rare. In most previous cases, non-surgical approaches with radiotherapy and chemotherapy were chosen due to skin fragility and multimorbidity. In the present case, vascular fragility and mucosal damage of the intestinal tract were not observed, and routine vascular and enteric anastomoses could be performed, with an uneventful postoperative course. Our findings suggest that highly invasive surgery, including free tissue transplantation such as with a free jejunal flap, can be performed in patients with DEB.

Good clinical response to cemiplimab in a young patient with locally advanced cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma on preexisting recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa.

Recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB) is a rare genetic skin disease caused by mutations in the type VII collagen gene (COL7A1; 3p21.31). Mutations in this gene lead to an alteration in function or reduced amounts of collagen VII. This alteration of collagen VII leads to skin fragility and lesions at minor injuries with difficult healing. Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) is more frequent in patients with RDEB than in the general population because of chronic wound formation; it constitutes a major cause of morbidity and is often cited as a cause of death for these patients. There is little experience with the treatment of cSCC in patients with RDEB. We report the case of a 19-year-old female patient with RDBE and inoperable locally advanced cSCC of the left arm. Because of the lack of therapy options, therapy with cemiplimab was started at a dose of 350 mg administered intravenously every 3 weeks. A confirmed clinical response was observed after the second cycle of treatment with no toxicity. During follow-up, the patient had a notable clinical response with no auto-immune adverse reactions. This shows that cemiplimab has a good safety profile for cSCC in patients with RDEB and is a valuable therapy option.

Dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa is associated with glycolytically active GATA3+ T helper 2 cells which may contribute to pruritus in lesional skin.

BACKGROUND: Dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DDEB) is characterized by trauma-induced blisters and, in some individuals, intense pruritus. Precisely what causes itch in DDEB and optimal ways to reduce it have not been fully determined. OBJECTIVES: To characterize DDEB skin transcriptomes to identify therapeutic targets to reduce pruritus in patients. METHODS: Using bulk RNA sequencing, we evaluated affected and unaffected skin biopsy samples from six patients with DDEB (all with the very itchy pruriginosa subtype) and four healthy individuals. Single-cell transcriptomes of affected (n = 2) and unaffected (n = 1) DDEB skin and healthy skin (n = 2) were obtained. Dupilumab treatment was provided for three patients. RESULTS: The skin bulk transcriptome showed significant enrichment of T helper (Th)1/2 and Th17 pathways in affected DDEB skin compared with nonlesional DDEB skin and healthy skin. Single-cell transcriptomics showed an association of glycolytically active GATA3+ Th2 cells in affected DDEB skin. Treatment with dupilumab in three people with DDEB led to significantly reduced visual analogue scale (VAS) itch scores after 12 weeks (mean VAS 3.83) compared with pretreatment (mean VAS 7.83). Bulk RNAseq and quantitative polymerase chain reaction showed that healthy skin and dupilumab-treated epidermolysis bullosa (EB) pruriginosa skin have similar transcriptomic profiles and reduced Th1/Th2 and Th17 pathway enrichment. CONCLUSIONS: Single-cell RNAseq helps define an enhanced DDEB-associated Th2 profile and rationalizes drug repurposing of anti-Th2 drugs in treating DDEB pruritus.

Dominant dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DDEB) is a rare inherited skin disease that causes fragile skin that blisters easily, often triggered by minor injuries. These blisters are accompanied by intense itching, which can be distressing. The underlying cause of DDEB lies in genetic mutations in a gene called COL7A1. This gene encodes 'type VII collagen', a protein crucial for attaching the outer skin layer (epidermis) to the layer beneath (dermis). Although the genetic basis of DDEB is understood, the causes of itch are not known. As well as this, effective treatments for DDEB are lacking, which has driven scientists to explore innovative approaches like repurposing existing drugs. Drug repurposing involves using medications that have already been approved for other health conditions. One such drug is dupilumab, which is used for severe atopic dermatitis (eczema). Dupilumab targets immune cells called Th2 cells, which play a role in inflammation and allergies. While dupilumab has shown promise in relieving DDEB itching, the way it works in this condition is unclear. This study, carried out by a group of researchers in Taiwan, looked at gene expression in DDEB-affected and unaffected skin, and compared it to gene expression in healthy skin samples. We found heightened activity in Th2 immune cells and abnormal gene signals related to itching, similar to atopic dermatitis. These findings support using dupilumab and other anti-inflammatory drugs to alleviate itching in DDEB. Clinical trials will be crucial to evaluate the effectiveness of these drugs for managing DDEB symptoms. This research opens doors for enhanced treatment options and improving the quality of life of people living with DDEB.

Ocular Gene Therapy in a Patient with Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa.

Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa is a rare genetic disease caused by damaging variants in COL7A1, which encodes type VII collagen. Blistering and scarring of the ocular surface develop, potentially leading to blindness. Beremagene geperpavec (B-VEC) is a replication-deficient herpes simplex virus type 1-based gene therapy engineered to deliver functional human type VII collagen. Here, we report the case of a patient with cicatrizing conjunctivitis in both eyes caused by dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa who received ophthalmic administration of B-VEC, which was associated with improved visual acuity after surgery.

Oleogel-S10 in Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa: A Case Series Evaluating the Impact on Wound Burden Over Two Years.

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare, difficult-to-treat, inherited multisystem diseases affecting epithelial integrity. Impaired wound healing is central and can lead to serious clinical complications, deformities, and symptoms with a devastating impact on quality of life (QoL). Dressing changes and wound care are central to the management of EB. Recently Oleogel-S10 (also known as birch bark extract or birch triterpenes) was approved in Europe and the UK for treating EB wounds. This approval was based on data from the EASE phase 3 study, which demonstrated Oleogel-S10 accelerated wound healing, reduced total wound burden, and decreased the frequency of dressing changes in patients with EB. A retrospective analysis of medical records was conducted for up to 24 months in 13 patients with EB treated with Oleogel-S10 through an early access programme in Colombia. Effectiveness was assessed by measuring body surface area percentage (BSAP) and total body wound burden (EBDASI). Tolerability and safety were monitored throughout. This is the first report to evaluate the effectiveness of Oleogel-S10 in clinical practice. The results showed a reduction in percentage of BSA affected, from a mean of 27.3% at baseline to 10.4% at 24-month follow-up, despite treatment interruptions. A reduction in EBDASI skin activity score of - 16.2 (24 months) together with a reduced skin damage index score of - 15.4 (18 months) was also observed. Physicians, patients, and caregivers perceived faster wound closure. Adherence with therapy by patients was good, and patients expressed satisfaction with treatment and reported improvements in self-esteem, productivity, and social interaction. Oleogel-S10 was well tolerated; however, two patients reported worsening wounds related to gauze adherence. Two deaths during treatment interruption were reported and was not considered related to Oleogel-S10. This study supports the effectiveness of Oleogel-S10 in a real-world scenario in a country with scarce resources for the treatment of EB.

Pruritus Anesis in Dystrophic Epidermolysis Bullosa Pruriginosa with Dupilumab.

ABSTRACT: Dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa (DEB-Pr) is a rare subtype of dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa, and traditional treatments have limited efficacy. Dupilumab has demonstrated remarkable efficacy in relieving pruritus. In this case study, after traditional treatment failed, providers recommended the patient begin dupilumab to treat his pruritus. The patient was administrated a loading dose of 600 mg of dupilumab and a dose of 300 mg every 2 weeks. The Dermatology Life Quality Index and Pruritic Numeric Rating Scale were used to assess the patient's situation. After several months, the patient's DEB-Pr was considered in remission. Dupilumab may be a better choice than immunosuppressants for the treatment of pruritus in patients with DEB-Pr.

Gross motor development in children with epidermolysis bullosa.

BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a group of rare, congenital skin disorders, characterized by skin fragility and formation of blisters. The gross motor outcomes of children with EB are not known. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of the study was to measure the proportion of gross motor delay in children with EB. The secondary objectives were to measure the difference in gross motor outcomes between EB sub-types and change in gross motor outcomes over time. METHODS: Children with EB, aged between one month and five and a half years of age, attending the Sydney Children's Hospital, Epidermolysis Bullosa Clinic, were eligible. Carers completed Ages and Stages Questionnaires, Third Edition, on behalf of their children. Questionnaires were scored, and outcomes were compared to age-expected norms. RESULTS: There were 24 participants to complete a questionnaire. Eleven participants completed additional questionnaires over the 24 month study duration. The proportion of children with EB with gross motor delay was greater than age-expected norms (29.17% vs. 2.5%). The delay occurred in children with recessive dystrophic (80%) and epidermolysis bullosa simplex (33.33%) sub-types, but not dominant dystrophic (0%). No children with Junctional EB or Kindler EB joined this study. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a difference in gross motor outcomes in children with EB. Children with recessive dystrophic and epidermolysis bullosa simplex should be prioritized for monitoring of, and intervention for, gross motor outcomes through multidisciplinary care. Further research investigating long-term outcomes for children with EB and the effectiveness of interventions would be beneficial.

Efficacy of oral JAK1 or JAK1/2 inhibitor for treating refractory pruritus in dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa: A retrospective case series.

Refractory pruritus is the most distressing, disease-related symptom in patients with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB), inducing an itch-scratch-blister cycle. Chronic inflammation is a hallmark of DEB, thus upregulation of inflammatory cytokines and Janus kinase (JAK) signaling may play a role in DEB-related pruritus. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of DEB patients with refractory pruritus who were treated with either baricitinib, a JAK1/2 inhibitor, or upadacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor. Patients received baricitinib (4 mg) or upadacitinib (15 mg) once a day for 2-32 weeks. A total of 12 DEB patients (six recessive DEB and six dominant DEB) were included in this study. The mean±SD baseline pruritus visual analog scale (VAS) score was 7.5 ± 1.7. Upadacitinib or baricitinib treatment resulted in a rapid and sustained decrease in itch. Four out of 12 patients (33.3%) and seven out of 10 patients (70%) showed a decrease of at least 3 points in the pruritus VAS score from baseline at weeks 2 and 4, respectively. The mean percentage changes from baseline in pruritus VAS scores at weeks 2 and 4 were -42.9% and -52.7%, respectively. Subgroup analysis showed greater reductions in the pruritus VAS score in the baricitinib group (n = 5) compared to the upadacitinib group (n = 7), and in patients with epidermolysis bullosa pruriginosa (n = 3) compared to other subtypes of DEB (n = 9); however, these differences did not reach statistical significance. Three out of 10 (33.3%) patients showed at least a 2-point reduction in pain intensity from baseline at week 4. Eight out of 12 patients (66.7%) also showed a reduction in the number of new blisters, which correlated with a reduction in the pruritus score. No patient discontinued treatment because of serious adverse events. Our results suggest that JAK1 or JAK1/2 inhibitors could be a promising treatment option for DEB-related pruritus. Long-term safety should be assessed in future studies.

[Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas: a complication of severe forms of hereditary epidermolysis bullosa]. / Carcinomes épidermoïdes cutanés : une complication des formes graves d'épidermolyses bulleuses héréditaires.

Despite an increase in life expectancy and quality of life for patients suffering from severe forms of hereditary epidermolysis bullosa, the occurrence of one or more cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas remains a sometimes serious complication, sometimes life-threatening as early as adolescence. These carcinomas occur preferably on chronic wounds or dystrophic scars in areas not exposed to the sun, and are generally multifocal and recurrent. Their clinical and histological diagnosis is difficult. Regular medical and paramedical monitoring of the skin during dressing repairs enables early detection and rapid, curative surgical management. The pathophysiology of these cutaneous carcinomas is the subject of research aimed at proposing non-surgical alternatives to the patients concerned.

[Cutaneous squamous cell carcinomas in EBDR: how can they be detected?] / Carcinomes épidermoïdes cutanés au cours de l'EBDR : comment les dépister ?

The occurrence of cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma is a frequent and potentially serious complication in people with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa and junctional epidermolysis bullosa with chronic leg sores. Early diagnosis of early-stage carcinomas enables limited surgical excision and rapid healing without sequelae. Screening during skin care of patients at risk is therefore of major interest, and any atypical lesion should be shown to a doctor specializing in the disease and biopsied at the slightest doubt, preferably in an expert center for the disease.

Clinical and molecular features in a cohort of Middle Eastern patients with epidermolysis bullosa.

BACKGROUND: Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) features skin and mucosal fragility due to pathogenic variants in genes encoding components of the cutaneous basement membrane. Based on the level of separation within the dermal-epidermal junction, EB is sub-classified into four major types including EB simplex (EBS), junctional EB (JEB), dystrophic EB (DEB), and Kindler EB (KEB) with 16 EB-associated genes reported to date. METHODS: We ascertained a cohort of 151 EB patients of various Middle Eastern ethnic backgrounds. RESULTS: The cohort was comprised of EBS (64%, 97/151), DEB (21%, 31/151), JEB (12%, 18/151), and KEB (3%, 5/151). KRT14 and KRT5 variants were most common among EBS patients with 43% (42/97) and 46% (45/97) of EBS patients carrying mutations in either of these two genes, respectively. Truncal involvement was more common in KRT14-associated EBS as compared to EBS due to KRT5 mutations (p < .05). Mutations in COL17A1 and laminin 332-encoding genes were identified in 55% (10/18) and 45% (8/18) of JEB patients. Scarring alopecia, caries, and EB nevi were most common among JEB patients carrying COL17A1 mutations as compared to laminin 332-associated JEB (p < .05). Abnormal nails were evident in most DEB and JEB patients while poikiloderma was exclusively observed in KEB (p < .001). CONCLUSIONS: EB patients of Middle Eastern origin were found to feature specific phenotype-genotype correlations of relevance to the diagnosis and genetic counseling of patients in this region.

MicroRNA-200b-mediated reversion of a spectrum of epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition states in recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa squamous cell carcinomas.

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is the leading cause of death in patients with recessive dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (RDEB). However, the survival time from first diagnosis differs between patients; some tumours spread particularly fast, while others may remain localized for years. As treatment options are limited, there is an urgent need for further insights into the pathomechanisms of RDEB tumours, to foster therapy development and support clinical decision-making. OBJECTIVES: To investigate differences in RDEB tumours of diverging aggressiveness at the molecular and phenotypic level, with a particular focus on epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) transition states and thus microRNA-200b (miR-200b) as a regulator. METHODS: Primary RDEB-SCC keratinocyte lines were characterized with respect to their EMT state. For this purpose, cell morphology was classified and the expression of EMT markers analysed using immunofluorescence, flow cytometry, semi-quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction and Western blotting. The motility of RDEB-SCC cells was determined and conditioned medium of RDEB-SCC cells was used to treat endothelial cells in an angiogenesis assay. In addition, we mined previously generated microRNA (miRNA) profiling data to identify a candidate with potential therapeutic relevance and performed transient miRNA transfection studies to investigate the candidate's ability to reverse EMT characteristics. RESULTS: We observed high variability in EMT state in the RDEB-SCC cell lines, which correlated with in situ analysis of two available patient biopsies and respective clinical disease course. Furthermore, we identified miR-200b-3p to be downregulated in RDEB-SCCs, and the extent of deregulation significantly correlated with the EMT features of the various tumour lines. miR-200b-3p was reintroduced into RDEB-SCC cell lines with pronounced EMT features, which resulted in a significant increase in epithelial characteristics, including cell morphology, EMT marker expression, migration and angiogenic potential. CONCLUSIONS: RDEB-SCCs exist in different EMT states and the level of miR-200b is indicative of how far an RDEB-SCC has gone down the EMT path. Moreover, the reintroduction of miR-200b significantly reduced mesenchymal features.