Mid-term safety and effectiveness of macular peeling one month after intravitreal dexamethasone implant for tractional diabetic macular edema.

Macular peeling combined or followed by intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DEX-i) was recommended as an efficacy approach for tractional diabetic macular edema (tDME). Knowing the synergistic effect of cataract surgery and DEX-i one month earlier in eyes with DME, we compared Epiretinal Membrane/Inner Limiting Membrane (ERM/ILM) peeling preceded by DEX-i one month before versus ERM/ILM peeling alone for the treatment of tDME. A retrospective study on patients affected by tDME who underwent ERM/ILM peeling one month after DEX-i (n = 11; Group A) or ERM/ILM peeling alone (n = 10; Group B) was performed. Longitudinal comparison of best-correct visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and intraocular pressure (IOP) between the time of surgery (T0) and each time point (months 1,3,5,6) within and among the groups were assessed. To evaluate the repeated measurements of BCVA, CRT, and IOP, a linear mixed-effects model was used. In Group A, DEX-i significantly improved mean BCVA and CRT (P < 0.001) just after 1 month (T0). After ERM/ILM peeling, mean BCVA and CRT significantly improved from month 1 in Group A and month 3 in Group B. Mixed model revealed a significant difference in BCVA (P ≤ 0.0001) and CRT (P ≤ 0.02) at different time-points among the groups with better results in Group A. Neither complications nor uncontrolled IOP increase was detected. ERM/ILM peeling confirmed its effectiveness in treating tDME. DEX-i performed one month before surgery seemed to be a safe approach and ensured a greater and faster recovery considering functional and tomographic parameters.

The efficacy and safety of ocriplasmin for patients with vitreous macular traction.

PURPOSE: To estimate the efficacy and safety of ocriplasmin for patients with vitreous macular traction (VMT). METHODS: The PubMed, EMBASE and Ovid were searched up to May 2020 to identify related studies. Statistical analysis was conducted by R software version 3.6.3. Results in proportion with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated by means of Freeman-Tukey variant of arcsine square transformation. RESULTS: The pooling results indicated the overall complete release rate was 50% (95% CI [45%-54%]). For VMT patients younger than 65 years old, with smaller adhesion size of VMT (<1500 µm), phakic eyes, with macular hole (MH) and subretinal fluid (SRF), while without epiretinal membrane (ERM), ocriplasmin could achieve much higher complete release rates than those under opposite conditions. The general nonsurgical closure rate of MH was 34% (95% CI [30%-37%]), and it was positively correlated with the MH size. The visual improvement rate was 45% (95% CI [32%-59%]), and it was higher for patients with VMT resolution (59%, 95% CI [41%-75%]). The secondary pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) rate for patients without MH closure or VMT resolution was about 31% (95% CI [23%-39%]). The incidence of MH progression was 10% (95% CI [4%-18%]), and other severe adverse events such as endophthalmitis, retinal detachment and retinal tear were relatively rare. CONCLUSION: Ocriplasmin is an effective, reliable and relatively safe intervention for the treatment of VMT. The most suitable candidates were patients younger than 65 years old, with smaller adhesion size (<1500 µm), phakic eyes, with MH and SRF, while without ERM.

A prospective randomized clinical trial comparing nepafenac, intravitreal triamcinolone and no adjuvant therapy for epiretinal membrane.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of topical nepafenac 0.1% versus intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) at the conclusion of vitrectomy surgery versus no adjuvant therapy (NAT) in improving macular morphology post-operatively in patients undergoing vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane (ERM), as measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA). METHODS: Design: Prospective randomized clinical trial Setting: Multi-centre 80 patients scheduled to undergo vitrectomy surgery for idiopathic ERM were randomized to receive either IVTA (4 mg/0.1 cc) at the end of surgery, topical nepafenac sodium 0.1% TID for 1 month post-operation or no adjuvant treatment (NAT). Optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging, best-corrected visual acuity and intraocular pressure (IOP) were measured before surgery, and 1 and 2 months post-operation. RESULTS: Although all three groups showed reduction in macular thickness post-operation, the NAT group showed the most improvement, with a reduction of 136.18 ± 29.84 µm at two months. There was no statistically significant difference in macular thickness between the groups at each time point, p = 0.158. The NAT group also had the best recovery in BCVA with an improvement of 0.207 logMAR (10.35 letters) at two months post-operation. There was no statistically significant difference in BCVA between the groups, p = 0.606. There was statistically significant difference in the IOP between the three groups, p = 0.04 only at 1-month visit. The IVTA group had the highest rise in average IOP at both 1 and 2 months post-operation (2.72 and 1.58 mmHg, respectively). CONCLUSION: Our study data suggest there was no advantage in the use of topical nepafenac or IVTA for post-vitrectomy ERM surgery.

Epiretinal membrane appearance or progression after intravitreal injection in age-related macular degeneration.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) in the appearance or progression of epiretinal membranes (ERMs) in age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) and investigate confounding factors causing ERMs. METHODS: Seventy-six eyes that were treated for more than 36 months from the first anti-VEGF injection were assessed. Binary logistic regression analysis was performed between smoking, lens status, subretinal hemorrhage, posterior vitreous detachment (PVD) status, peripheral retinal degeneration, type of AMD, conditions of contralateral eye, and the number of injections as independent variables and appearance or progression of ERMs during 36 months as dependent variables. RESULTS: The presence of vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) or development of PVD during the observation period was significantly associated (Odds ratio [OR]: 5.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.72-19.4; p = 0.005) with the appearance or progression of ERMs. Moreover, peripheral retinal degeneration was significantly associated (OR: 3.87; 95% CI, 1.15-13.0; p = 0.029). Injection number of anti-VEGF was not significantly associated (OR: 1.02; 95% CI, 0.90-1.16; p = 0.72). CONCLUSION: This study suggests possibilities that anti-VEGF injections alone are unable to cause the development of ERMs, that VMA or developing PVD has a prior impact on the developing ERMs in ARMD similar to that of idiopathic ERMs, and that peripheral retinal degenerations and vitreomacular adhesion were both related to ERMs development and pathogenesis of ARMD.

Bilateral Drug-Induced Uveitis and Epiretinal Membrane during the Treatment of a Metastatic Cutaneous Melanoma.

Purpose: To report the case of a drug-induced uveitis during the treatment of a metastatic cutaneous melanoma.Case report: A 75-year-old female treated with Dabrafenib and Trametinib due to a cutaneous melanoma stage IV presented with blurriness in both eyes. The examination revealed bilateral intraocular signs of inflammation, and fundoscopy showed bilateral changes at the posterior pole, such as chorioretinal folds and Neurosensory Retinal Detachment (NRD). Due to a worsening of Visual Acuity (VA) and persistence of intraocular inflammation in spite of topical prednisolone acetate treatment, the therapy with Dabrafenib + Trametinib was interrupted, after having been administered for 4 months, and replaced by Nivolumab. Fundus abnormalities and intraocular inflammation improved, but VA remained low due to the presence of an epiretinal membrane in the right eye. Then, a decreasing course of prednisolone eye drops was introduced for one more month and finally interrupted without the cessation of Nivolumab.Conclusion: Drug-induced uveitis has been increasing in the last few years due to the development of new biological agents for treatment of different types of tumours. The management of these adverse events should be handled in collaboration with oncologists and ophthalmologists and must be individualised and based on the risk-benefit balance. A case report of an uveitis and subsequent development of an epiretinal membrane during the treatment with Dabrafenib, Trametinib and subsequent Nivolumab for a metastatic cutaneous melanoma is reported here, in order to note the importance of an adequate follow-up of patients treated with these drugs.

The effects of epiretinal membranes on the treatment outcomes of intravitreal aflibercept injection in diabetic macular edema: a real-life study.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of epiretinal membrane (ERM) formation on the anatomic and functional results of subjects with diabetic macular edema (DME) who are receiving intravitreal aflibercept injections (IAIs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective comparative study includes 29 eyes with DME (Group 1) and 43 eyes with DME and ERM (Group 2). After three consecutive monthly 2.0 mg IAIs, subjects received monthly follow-ups and retreatment was performed if needed. Corrected visual acuity (CVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and central macular volume (CMV) parameters were recorded tri-monthly, and the 36-month follow-up was designated the primary endpoint of the study. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between groups when comparing the mean ages and male-to-female ratios (p > 0.05, for both). At the baseline, the mean CVA value was significantly worse (p = 0.002), and the mean CMT was significantly lower (p = 0.016) in Group 1, while there was no significant difference in terms of the mean CMV (p = 0.625). The mean number of IAIs was similar at the first (p < 0.102), second (p = 0.363), and third year (p = 0.850) follow-ups. The mean CVA was significantly worse, and CMT was significantly lower in Group 1 at most of the visits in the first half of the follow-up period (p < 0.05, for all), while there was no significant difference in the second half of the follow-up period. There was no significant difference between groups in terms of CMV at any visit (p > 0.05, for all). CONCLUSION: Despite a similar number of IAIs needed, worse baseline clinical parameters are associated with poorer early- or mid-term outcomes. At the long-term follow-up, CVA and CMT became similar in DME independent of ERM.

Perioperative intraretinal fluid observed using optical coherence tomography in the epiretinal membrane.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative intraretinal fluid (IRF) is reportedly associated with visual outcomes after epiretinal membrane (ERM) surgery. However, preoperative IRF is common, and persistent IRF would have different impact on visual function from postoperative newly developed IRF. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the incidence rate and clinical implications of perioperative IRF in ERM. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent vitrectomy for idiopathic ERM between January 2014 and January 2017 were reviewed retrospectively. The incidence of IRF was analyzed using optical coherence tomography preoperatively and 1, 3, and 6 months postoperatively. On the basis of the presence or absence and the time of detection of IRF, patients were divided into three groups, namely preoperative IRF group, New IRF group, and IRF(-) group. Correlations of various parameters including age, sex, baseline visual acuity (VA), central subfield macular thickness, lens status, and surgical factors with IRF, along with the effect of IRF on VA, were evaluated. RESULTS: This study included 155 eyes from 155 patients. Thirty-six (23.2%) and 49 (31.6%) eyes demonstrated preoperative and newly developed IRF, respectively. Seventy eyes (45.2%), which did not exhibit IRF during the study period, were assigned to the IRF(-) group. At baseline, the IRF(-) group showed a better VA than the other two groups. Postoperatively, VA improved significantly in all three groups. There was no difference in VA between the IRF(-) and new IRF groups at 6 months; however, the preoperative IRF group had significantly lower VA than the other two groups. CONCLUSION: IRF associated with ERM was frequently observed preoperatively and postoperatively, but it did not prevent postoperative vision improvement. Preoperative IRF was related to lower postoperative vision improvement.

Idelalisib inhibits vitreous-induced Akt activation and proliferation of retinal pigment epithelial cells from epiretinal membranes.

Proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) is a blinding fibrotic eye disease that develops in 8-10% of patients who undergo primary retinal detachment-reparative surgery and in 40-60% of patients with open-globe injury. At present, there is no pharmacological treatment for this devastating disease. Vitreal growth factors activate their respective receptors of cells in the vitreous, trigger their downstream signaling transduction (e.g. phosphoinositide 3 kinases (PI3Ks)/Akt), and drive cellular responses intrinsic to the pathogenesis of PVR. PI3Ks play a central role in experimental PVR. However, which isoform(s) are involved in PVR pathogenesis remain unknown. Herein, we show that p110δ, a catalytic subunit of receptor-regulated PI3K isoform δ, is highly expressed in epiretinal membranes from patients with PVR, and that idelalisib, a specific inhibitor of PI3Kδ, effectively inhibits vitreous-induced Akt activation, proliferation, migration and contraction of retinal pigment epithelial cells derived from an epiretinal membrane of a PVR patient. Small molecules of kinase inhibitors have shown great promise as a class of therapeutics for a variety of human diseases. The data herein suggest that idelalisib is a promising PVR prophylactic.

Efficacy and Safety of Combined Vitrectomy with Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant for Advanced Stage Epiretinal Membrane.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of combined 25-gauge (G) pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) with intravitreal dexamethasone implant (DXI) for the treatment of advanced stage epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: Forty consecutive pseudophakic eyes with idiopathic stage 3-4 ERM and intraretinal cysts were randomly assigned to two treatment groups. Twenty eyes underwent combined 25-G PPV, ERM peeling and slow-release DXI (DEX group), whereas 20 eyes underwent standard 25-G PPV with ERM peeling only (control group). Differences in postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), central macular thickness (CMT) were evaluated. RESULTS: In all patients, BCVA significantly increased at 1, 3 and 6 months after surgery compared to baseline (all p < 0.05), but at 3 and 6 months, the visual gain was higher in the DEX group (respectively, p = 0.036, p = 0.006). CMT was significantly lower in DEX group compared to control group at 3 and 6 months after surgery (respectively, p = 0.042, p = 0.003). There was no statistically significant difference in IOP change over the course of the follow-up between groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Combined 25-G PPV with DXI is associated with better anatomical and functional outcomes in patients with advanced stage ERM.

Laser photocoagulation, intravitreal anti-VEGF, and vitreous surgery for the treatment of juxtapapillary retinal capillary hemangioma.

Juxtapapillary retinal capillary hemangiomas (JRCHs) are benign vascular tumors located on or adjacent to the optic nerve head. A 19-year-old girl presented with epiretinal membrane (ERM) associated with an elevated and round vascular tumoral mass located in the juxtapapillary region of her left eye. She was subsequently diagnosed with isolated JRCH. A combined approach with laser photocoagulation and intravitreal bevacizumab injection was used to facilitate shrinkage of the tumor preoperatively and pars plana vitrectomy was used to remove the tumor and ERM. A small remnant of tumoral mass remained intact and did not show any growth for 7 years.

Association of vitreous vitamin C depletion with diabetic macular ischemia in proliferative diabetic retinopathy.

PURPOSE: Vitreous vitamin C, as an anti-oxidant, is responsible for regulating oxygen tension and oxidative stress in the eye. Oxidative stress and retinal ischemia are implicated in the development of proliferative diabetic retinopathy (PDR). In this study, we aimed to determine whether vitreous level of vitamin C is compromised in patients with PDR and to investigate the association of diabetic macular ischemia and vitamin C. METHODS: This prospective study enrolled forty patients who underwent pars plana vitrectomy for the treatment of PDR (PDR group, n = 20) and idiopathic epiretinal membrane (control group, n = 20). Serum, aqueous humor, and the vitreous were collected for the analysis of vitamin C level by HPLC. Diabetic macular ischemia (DMI) in PDR group was evaluated with fluorescein angiography (FA). RESULTS: PDR patients (60.4 ± 2.1 y) were younger than non-diabetic control patients (67.4 ± 1.2 y). Serum, aqueous, and vitreous levels of vitamin C in PDR were 38.7%, 22.5%, and 11.1% of non-diabetic control group, respectively. All PDR patients had DMI (grade 1: 25%, grade 2: 30%, grade 3: 30%, grade 4: 15%). DMI grade was inversely correlated with the level of vitreous vitamin C (r = -0.546, P = 0.019), not with HbA1C, serum, or aqueous vitamin C level. In addition, the level of vitreous vitamin C (4.5 ± 2.6 µg/ml) in high DMI group (Gr 3 &4) was lower than that (31.0 ± 9.1 µg/ml) in low DMI group (Gr 1&2) (P = 0.015). CONCLUSIONS: Vitreous level of vitamin C in PDR patients showed a tenfold decrease, which was associated with the degree of macular ischemia. This suggests that vitreous vitamin C depletion may cause macula ischemia in PDR patients.

Comparison of the effect of ranibizumab and dexamethasone implant in diabetic macular edema with concurrent epiretinal membrane.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy and safety of intravitreal ranibizumab (RZB) injections and intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant in diabetic macular edema (DME) with concurrent epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: This was a retrospective, observational, comparative study. Medical records of DME patients with concurrent ERM were retrospectively reviewed. Seventeen eyes of 16 patients treated with 3 consecutive monthly RZB injections (RZB group) and 22 eyes of 18 patients treated with a DEX implant (DEX group) were included. The groups were compared at baseline, 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th months in terms of best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central macular thickness (CMT), and intraocular pressure (IOP). RESULTS: Eighteen of the 39 eyes (46.1%) were phakic at baseline, 9 (52.9%) of which were treated with RZB, whereas 9 (40.9%) were treated with DEX implant (P=0.528). Although CMT improved significantly in both the RZB and DEX groups (P<0.001); the trend was different (P=0.003). The mean change in CMT at 1month in the DEX group was greater (DEX: 188.2±142.7µm; RZB: 95.7±110.7µm; P=0.034); it was in favor of RZB group at the 3rd and 4th months (DEX: -52.7±86.9µm; RZB: 1.4±31.4µm; P=0.012. DEX: -63±67.3µm; RZB: -5.8±43.9µm; P=0.004, respectively). BCVA improved significantly in both groups (P<0.001). There was no statistical difference between the groups with regard to gain in BCVA or IOP change throughout the study period (P=0.572, P=0.064, respectively). CONCLUSION: Both RZB and DEX are effective in improving anatomical and visual outcomes in DME with concurrent ERM. The DEX group was associated with a prompt anatomic response, but with a gradual decrease from 3rd month.

Triamcinolone in small-gauge vitrectomy for epiretinal membrane peeling.

OBJECTIVE: We compared visual and macular morphological outcomes after epiretinal membrane (ERM) peeling, with and without IVTA treatment. DESIGN: Interventional, retrospective, consecutive case-control study. PARTICIPANTS: Forty-one eyes of 41 participants (17 men, 24 women) were included. Twenty-one were treated by standard vitrectomy and peeling (controls) and 20 patients received intravitreal triamcinolone after vitrectomy and peeling. METHODS: Pre-and postoperative letter score and central foveal thickness (CFT) through the foveal centre were compared between both groups. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) was measured using Snellen charts and converted to logMAR for statistical analyses. RESULTS: CFT and BCVA had improved by the 6-month follow-up from baseline. In the control group, the mean logMAR BCVA improved from 0.57 (SD: 0.22) to 0.21 (0.17) (p < 0.01), and the mean CFT reduced from 462.5 (98.6) µm to 329.8 (82.7) µm (p < 0.01). The mean logMAR BCVA of the IVTA group improved from 0.73 (0.17) to 0.36 (0.31) (p < 0.01), and the mean CFT reduced from 561.45 (131.0) µm to 339.25 (72.6) µm (p < 0.01). Visual improvement and CFT did not differ significantly at follow up (p = 0.583; p= 0.85). Significant reduction of CFT is seen in the IVTA group (p = 0.048). CONCLUSIONS: Visual acuity and macular morphology improved after ERM peeling, with or without IVTA. Although conjunctive IVTA did not significantly influence visual outcome at 6 months, a significant decrease in CFT was observed after IVTA administration.

Short term effect of intravitreal bevacizumab for diabetic macular edema associated with epiretinal membrane.

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection on central macular thickness (CMT) in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) associated with epiretinal membrane (ERM) and compare the results to those with DME without ERM. Methods: 54 eyes of 54 patients with DME were included in this prospective comparative case series. Twenty-eight patients had ERM. All patients received 2.5 mg/ 0.1 ml IVB. The primary outcome measure was the change in central macular thickness (CMT) and the secondary outcome measure was the change in best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), one month after the IVB injection. Results: All the patients completed 1-month follow-up. One month after the IVB injection, there was no statistically significant reduction in terms of CMT for the ERM group (22.64 ± 70.1 µm; P = 0.099), unlike eyes with DME alone (60.34 ± 88.5 µm; P = 0.002). Patients with ERM had a -0.09 ± 0.14 log MAR improvement in their BCVA (P =0.001) vs. 0.03 ± Log MAR change in the patients who did not have ERM (P = 0.37). Conclusion: In this study, intravitreal bevacizumab resulted in improvement in BCVA in patients who had DME associated with ERM. However, in patients who only had DME, despite a reduction in CMT, no improvement in BCVA occurred. Future randomized clinical trials are warranted to precisely assess the effect of bevacizumab on the ERM.

The Impact of Epiretinal Membrane in Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatment: A Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography Study.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this prospective study was to evaluate the impact of epiretinal membrane (ERM) on anatomical and functional results in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (AMD) treated with intravitreal anti-vascular endothelial growth (anti-VEGF) injections. METHODS: Participants in the study were 48 patients with either wet AMD alone (AMD group, n = 27) or AMD and ERM (AMD/ERM group, n = 21). All patients received intravitreal anti-VEGF injections (three monthly injections and PRN thereafter) and were followed up for at least 12 months. All participants had best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) measurement and spectral domain-optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) at each visit, while fluorescein angiography was performed at baseline and then at the discretion of the physician. RESULTS: There was a statistically significant improvement in BCVA at month 12 compared to baseline in each group (p < 0.001 for both groups), while the two groups did not differ significantly regarding BCVA at the end of the follow-up (p = 0.056). Additionally, there was a statistically significant reduction in CRT in both groups at month 12 (p < 0.001 for AMD group and p = 0.004 for AMD/ERM group) with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.183). Patients in the AMD group had a lower percentage of subretinal fluid (25.9%) than patients in the AMD/ERM group (52.4%) at the end of the follow-up, while ellipsoid zone disruption was found to be more profound in the AMD/ERM group (38.1%) than in the AMD group (18.5%). Patients in the AMD/ERM group needed more injections (7.1 ± 2.0 injections) than patients in the AMD group (4.8 ± 1.7 injections). CONCLUSIONS: Patients in the AMD/ERM group had a higher percentage of subretinal and intraretinal fluid and ellipsoid zone interruption during the follow-up period. Anti-VEGF treatment appeared to have a beneficial effect in both groups, although the AMD/ERM group needed more injections compared to the AMD group.

Effect of Methotrexate on an In Vitro Patient-Derived Model of Proliferative Vitreoretinopathy.

Purpose: The purpose of this study was to develop a method for isolating, culturing, and characterizing cells from patient-derived membranes in proliferative vitreoretinopathy (PVR) to be used for drug testing. Methods: PVR membranes were obtained from six patients with grade C PVR. Membrane fragments were analyzed by gross evaluation, fixed for immunohistologic studies to establish cell identity, or digested with collagenase II to obtain single cell suspensions for culture. PVR-derived primary cultures were used to examine the effects of methotrexate (MTX) on proliferation, migration, and cell death. Results: Gross analysis of PVR membranes showed presence of pigmented cells, indicative of retinal pigment epithelial cells. Immunohistochemistry identified cells expressing α-smooth muscle actin, glial fibrillary acidic protein, Bestrophin-1, and F4/80, suggesting the presence of multiple cell types in PVR. Robust PVR primary cultures (C-PVR) were successfully obtained from human membranes, and these cells retained the expression of cell identity markers in culture. C-PVR cultures formed membranes and band-like structures in culture reminiscent of the human condition. MTX significantly reduced the proliferation and band formation of C-PVR, whereas it had no significant effect on cell migration. MTX also induced regulated cell death within C-PVR as assessed by increased expression of caspase-3/7. Conclusions: PVR cells obtained from human membranes can be successfully isolated, cultured, and profiled in vitro. Using these primary cultures, we identified MTX as capable of significantly reducing growth and inducing cell death of PVR cells in vitro.

Effect of Epiretinal Membranes on Antivascular Endothelial Growth Factor Treatment for Neovascular Age-Related Macular Degeneration.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of epiretinal membranes (ERMs), detected with spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT), on the outcome of antivascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment for neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD). METHODS: A total of 434 eyes with treatment-naive nAMD were retrospectively included and analyzed. All patients were administered an initial series of 3 monthly loading injections of ranibizumab or aflibercept, followed by further injections as required. The visual and anatomical outcomes were compared between the eyes with ERMs and those without. Features of ERMs at baseline assessed with SD-OCT were evaluated and correlated with visual outcomes. RESULTS: Sixty-eight eyes (15.7%) with nAMD presented ERMs at baseline. The mean best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) of these eyes, expressed as the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, improved from 0.75 ± 0.48 (Snellen equivalent: 20/112) to 0.59 ± 0.44 (20/77) after 12 months of treatment (P = 0.021). Central foveal thickness also decreased from 381 ± 191 µm to 294 ± 167 µm (P < 0.001). Compared to the eyes without ERMs (366 eyes), the eyes with ERMs had a significantly thicker central fovea after treatment (P = 0.020). However, the intergroup differences in BCVA improvement were not significant. No significant association was found between visual outcome after treatment and ERM features on OCT at baseline. CONCLUSIONS: In eyes with nAMD, ERMs were infrequent. Central foveal thickness was significantly greater after anti-VEGF treatment in eyes with nAMD and ERMs. However, the presence of ERMs in eyes with nAMD did not affect visual outcome.

Efficacy of vitrectomy and inner limiting membrane peeling in age-related macular degeneration resistant to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy, with vitreomacular traction or epiretinal membrane.

PURPOSE: We assessed the efficacy of vitrectomy and inner limiting membrane (ILM) peeling, followed by anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) therapy, anti-VEGF-resistant age-related macular degeneration (AMD) due to vitreomacular traction (VMT) or epiretinal membrane (ERM). METHODS: We identified six patients with anti-VEGF-resistant AMD due to VMT or ERM amongst a total of 588 patients with AMD (821 eyes) referred to Okayama University Hospital between February 2012 and May 2014. These patients underwent vitrectomy to release the VMT (4 cases) or remove the ERM (2 cases), along with ILM peeling. The regimen used for intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF reagents after surgery was based on the severity of exudative changes in each patient. Preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) measurements were compared. RESULTS: After vitrectomy and ILM peeling, all six patients responded to anti-VEGF therapy, which was then able to maintain dry retinas. Mean BCVA did not improve significantly (0.49 ± 0.28 before vs. 0.43 ± 0.38 after surgery, P = 0.538). However, mean CR was significantly decreased after surgery, from 423 ± 83.5 µm to 257 ± 75.8 µm (P = 0.0078). CONCLUSIONS: Vitrectomy and ILM peeling followed by anti-VEGF therapy may be a useful therapeutic option for anti-VEGF-resistant AMD with VMT or ERM.