Medicines associated with dependence or withdrawal symptoms: safe prescribing and withdrawal management for adults

This guideline covers general principles for prescribing and managing withdrawal from opioids, benzodiazepines, gabapentinoids, Z­drugs and antidepressants in primary and secondary care. It does not cover gabapentinoids prescribed for epilepsy, nor opioids prescribed for acute or cancer pain, or at the end of life, nor management of illicit drug dependence.

Z-drugs and Falls: A Focused Review of the Literature.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a focused review of the literature related to the association between exposure to Z-drugs and the risk of falls, especially in the older population.
DATA SOURCES: A literature search was conducted using Medline, PsychInfo, and the Cochrane Library database for all clinical trials, case series, and case reports published in English up to May 2020. The search terms used consisted of each Z-drug, including "zolpidem," "zopiclone," "eszopiclone," and "zaleplon," matched with "falls."
STUDY SELECTION: The search yielded 295 studies. After review of abstracts, content and references were reviewed, and duplicates removed, a total of 9 articles met inclusion of exposure to at least 1 Z-drug and a primary outcome of falls.
DATA EXTRACTION: The American Geriatrics Society 2019 Beers Criteria Update for Potentially Inappropriate Medication Use in Older Adults recommends to avoid using nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics in this patient population because of the risk of adverse events.
DATA SYNTHESIS: A majority of the literature suggests an increased risk of falls with exposure to Z-drug use, especially zolpidem. Eight trials examined falls as a primary outcome in non-elderly (n=3) and elderly (n=5) patients in different settings, mostly in an inpatient setting (nursing facility or acute care hospital).
CONCLUSION: Exposure to Z-drugs, especially zolpidem, should be evaluated and counseled on continuously as these medications put patients at an increased risk for falls and other complications.

Association of eszopiclone, zaleplon, or zolpidem with complex sleep behaviors resulting in serious injuries, including death.

PURPOSE: To identify and analyze postmarketing cases of complex sleep behaviors (CSBs) resulting in serious injuries, including death, associated with eszopiclone, zaleplon, or zolpidem (Z-drugs). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) from 16 December 1992 through 27 February 2018 and medical literature using PubMed and EMBASE. We used random sampling and descriptive statistics. RESULTS: We identified 66 cases that met inclusion and exclusion criteria, four of which were identified in the medical literature. Twenty cases reported death and 46 cases reported serious injuries in association with CSBs occurring after the use of a Z-drug. Fatal cases described events, such as carbon monoxide poisoning, drowning, falls, hypothermia, motor vehicle collisions, and apparent completed suicide. Nonfatal cases resulting in serious injuries described events, such as accidental overdoses, falls, gunshot wounds, hypothermia, third-degree burns, and self-injuries or suicide attempts. Twenty-two cases reported a previous episode of a CSB while taking a Z-drug prior to the event reported in this case series. CONCLUSIONS: The FAERS and medical literature cases support the need for increased awareness of the consequences that may occur because of CSBs associated with the use of Z-drugs. Therefore, to protect public health, regulatory actions were taken, including adding a Boxed Warning, a Contraindication in patients who have experienced a prior episode of a CSB with a Z-drug, and updating the existing Warnings and Precautions. An FDA Drug Safety Communication was also disseminated to alert healthcare professionals and the public of this potential risk.

Associations of Benzodiazepine With Adverse Prognosis in Heart Failure Patients With Insomnia.

Background The prognostic impact of benzodiazepines has been unclear in patients with heart failure (HF). Methods and Results This was a historical observational cohort study. A total of 826 patients who had been hospitalized for HF and were being treated for insomnia with either benzodiazepines or Z-drugs (zolpidem, zopiclone, or eszopiclone), were enrolled and divided on the basis of their hypnotics: benzodiazepine group (n=488 [59.1%]) and Z group (n=338 [40.9%]). We compared the patient characteristics and postdischarge prognosis between the groups. The primary end points were rehospitalization for HF and cardiac death. The benzodiazepine group was older (age, 72.0 versus 69.0 years; P=0.010), had a higher prevalence of depression (17.4% versus 8.9%; P<0.001), and showed a higher use of loop diuretics (77.9% versus 67.8%; P=0.001). In the laboratory data, the benzodiazepine group demonstrated lower levels of hemoglobin (12.3 versus 13.0 g/dL; P=0.001), sodium (139.0 versus 140.0 mEq/L; P=0.018), and albumin (3.7 versus 3.9 g/dL; P=0.003). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that both end points were higher in the benzodiazepine group (rehospitalization for HF, log-rank P=0.001; cardiac death, log-rank P=0.043). Multiple Cox proportional hazard analysis revealed that the use of benzodiazepines was an independent predictor of rehospitalization for HF (hazard ratio, 1.530; 95% CI, 1.025-2.284; P=0.038). Furthermore, rehospitalization for HF was higher in the benzodiazepine group after propensity score matching (log-rank P=0.036). Conclusions Benzodiazepine is associated with higher risk of rehospitalization for HF compared with Z-drugs in patients with HF.

Patients' Knowledge of Key Messaging in Drug Safety Communications for Zolpidem and Eszopiclone: A National Survey.

Drug Safety Communications (DSCs) are used by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to inform health care providers, patients, caregivers, and the general public about safety issues related to FDA-approved drugs. To assess patient knowledge of the messaging contained in DSCs related to the sleep aids zolpidem and eszopiclone, we conducted a large, cross-sectional patient survey of 1,982 commercially insured patients selected by stratified random sampling from the Optum Research Database who had filled at least two prescriptions for either zolpidem or eszopiclone between July 1, 2012 and June 30, 2013. Among the 594 respondents (32.7% response rate), two-thirds reported hearing generally about drug safety information prior to starting a new drug, with the remaining one-third "rarely" or "never" hearing such information. Providers and pharmacists were primary sources of drug safety information. Two-thirds of zolpidem users and half of eszopiclone users reported having heard about the related DSC messages, ability to accurately identify the major factual messages was limited (overall median 2 correct out of 5, with men and those reporting higher educational level scoring higher [2/5 vs. 1/5, p=0.001]). Respondents reacted to new drug safety information about their sleep aids by reporting that they would want to learn about alternative ways to help them sleep (70%) and seek out more information about the safety of their specific sleeping pill (59-78%). Opportunities may exist for the FDA to work with providers and pharmacies to help ensure the DSC information is more widely received and is more fully understood by those taking the affected medications.

Eszopiclone for the treatment of primary insomnia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: In this study, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of eszopiclone for the treatment of primary insomnia. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and PubMed from inception to June 2018. Additionally, we searched the ClinicalTrials.gov trials register for other relevant trials. According to participants, intervention, comparison, outcome (PICO) criteria, studies were included that focused on: adults diagnosed with primary insomnia, aged 18-65 and > 65 years; eszopiclone for the treatment of primary insomnia; comparison were made between eszopiclone and placebo; as well as primary outcomes, secondary outcomes, and adverse effects. RESULTS: A total of six randomized trials involving 2809 patients with primary insomnia were included in our analysis. Our analysis suggested that eszopiclone was associated with significant improvements in subjective sleep latency, wake after sleep onset, number of awakenings, total sleep time at one week, two weeks, one month, three months and six months. Meanwhile, eszopiclone was associated with increased quality of sleep, ability to function, daytime alertness and sense of physical well-being at one week, one month, three months and six months. Dizziness and unpleasant taste were the most common adverse effects in elderly subgroup. Alternately, non-elderly patients may be more prone to adverse effects such as infection, pharyngitis, somnolence, unpleasant taste and dry mouth. CONCLUSION: This meta-analysis showed that eszopiclone is an effective and safe therapy option for patients with primary insomnia, especially in elderly patients. However, due to the high clinical heterogeneity in some outcomes, further standardized preparation, large-scale and rigorously designed trials are needed.

Sedative Hypnotics and the Risk of Falls and Fractures in the Elderly.

Older age, poor sleep, and the use of the "Z" sedative hypnotic drugs (zopiclone, eszopiclone, zolpidem, and zaleplon) commonly go together. Each of these can increase the risk of falls and fractures through mechanisms related to cognitive and psychomotor impairment. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis examined the risk of falls and fractures associated with the use of the Z-drugs. The authors of that meta-analysis identified 14 relevant cohort and case-control studies. They found that Z-drugs increased the risk of falls in 2 out of 3 studies that provided information on this outcome; in the third, the increased risk narrowly missed statistical significance. Z-drugs increased the fracture risk in 9 of 10 studies (odds ratio [OR] = 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42-1.87). In secondary analyses, the fracture risk associated with the use of Z-drugs was elevated in studies that included a control group diagnosed with insomnia (OR = 1.28; 95% CI, 1.08-1.53) as well as in studies of samples restricted to subjects aged > 65 years (OR = 1.70; 95% CI, 1.36-2.12). In 2 studies, zolpidem was associated with an increased risk of injuries. Whereas confounding by indication may explain a part of the risk of falls and fractures, there is reason to consider that Z-drugs augment the risk. Either way, the use of Z-drugs emerges as a clear marker for the risk of falls and fractures. Nonpharmacologic interventions for insomnia should therefore be considered as alternatives to the use of Z-drugs. Finally, patients prescribed Z-drugs and caregivers of these patients should be warned about the risk of falls and fractures and counseled about practical measures that can reduce the risk.

Z-drugs and risk for falls and fractures in older adults-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Objective: zolpidem, zopiclone, eszopiclone and zaleplon, also known as 'Z-drugs', are commonly used as alternatives to benzodiazepines (BZDs) to treat insomnia. Z-drugs are often perceived as safer than BZDs. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the association between Z-drugs and fracutres, falls and injuries. Methods: a systematic review was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE and ClinicalTials.gov. Pooled effect-sizes were calculated comparing Z-drugs users with non-users, using fixed and random-effect models with corresponding 95% confidence of intervals (CI). Results: we identified 14 eligible studies reporting on the association between Z-drugs and outcomes of interest. Z-Drugs were associated with a statistically significant increased risk for fractures, with evidence of considerable heterogeneity (OR = 1.63; 95% CI: 1.42-1.87; I2 = 90%; n = 830,877). Likewise, there was a trend suggesting a 2-fold increase in the odds for falls, however, this result was not statistically significant and there was evidence of considerable heterogeneity (OR = 2.40; 95% CI: 0.92-6.27; I2 = 95%; n = 19,505). In an analysis assessing the risk for injuries following exposure to zolpidem we found a statistically significant increased risk of injuries, with no evidence of heterogeneity (OR = 2.05; CI 95%: 1.95-2.15; I2 = 0; n = 160,502). Results were similar in sensitivity analyses, including analyses restricted to studies of high-quality, studies with control groups suffering from insomnia, and with specific Z-drugs. Conclusion: our results indicate that Z-drugs are associated with an increased risk for fractures, and suggest a possible increased risk for falls and injuries as well. However, studies included were observational and susceptible to confounding. Physicians should consider these potential risks before prescribing these medications in older adults.

Patient and Physician Perceptions of Drug Safety Information for Sleep Aids: A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: The US Food and Drug Administration uses drug safety communications (DSCs) to release emerging information regarding post-market safety issues, but it is unclear the extent of awareness by patients and providers of these communications and their specific recommendations. OBJECTIVE: We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients and physicians to evaluate their awareness and understanding of emerging drug safety information related to two sleep aids: zolpidem or eszopiclone. METHODS: We conducted interviews with 40 patients and ten physicians recruited from a combination of insurer claims databases and online sources. We evaluated (1) sources of drug safety information; (2) discussions between patients and physicians about the two medications; (3) their knowledge of the DSC; and (4) preferences for learning about future drug safety information. Interviews were transcribed and analyzed thematically. RESULTS: Patients cited their physicians, pharmacy inserts, and the Internet as sources of drug safety information. Physicians often referred to medical journals and online medical sources. Most patients reported being aware of information contained in the DSC summaries they were read. Almost all patients and physicians reported discussing side effects during patient-provider conversations, but almost no patients mentioned that physicians had communicated with them key messaging from the DSCs at issue: the risk of next-morning impairment with zolpidem and the lower recommended initial dose for women. CONCLUSIONS: Some risks of medications are effectively communicated to patients and physicians; however, there is still a noticeable gap between information issued by the Food and Drug Administration and patient and physician awareness of this knowledge, as well as patients' decisions to act on this information. Disseminators of emerging drug safety information should explore ways of providing user-friendly resources to patients and healthcare professionals that can update them on new risks in a timely manner.

Nonbenzodiazepine Sedative Hypnotics and Risk of Fall-Related Injury.

STUDY OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that use of zolpidem, eszopiclone, and zaleplon would be associated with increased risk of traumatic brain injury (TBI) and hip fracture. METHODS: We conducted a case-crossover study on a 5% random sample of Medicare beneficiaries age 65 y or older hospitalized with either TBI (n = 15,031) or hip fracture (n = 37,833) during 2007-2009. Use of zolpidem, eszopiclone, or zaleplon during the 30-day period prior to injury hospitalization was compared to use during four control periods at 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo prior to injury. The primary outcome was hospitalization for TBI or hip fracture. RESULTS: Zolpidem use during the month prior to injury was associated with increased risk of TBI (odds ratio [OR] 1.87; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.56, 2.25); however, eszopiclone use during the same period was not associated with increased risk (OR 0.67; 95% CI 0.40, 1.13). Zolpidem use during the month prior to injury was associated with increased risk of hip fracture (OR 1.59; 95% CI 1.41, 1.79); however, eszopiclone use during the same period was not associated with increased risk (OR 1.12; 95% CI 0.83, 1.50). Analysis of zaleplon use in the month prior to injury was limited by low drug utilization but was not associated with increased risk of TBI (OR 0.85; 95% CI 0.21, 3.34) or hip fracture (OR 0.92; 95% CI 0.40, 2.13) in this study. CONCLUSIONS: For the treatment of insomnia in older adults, eszopiclone may present a safer alternative to zolpidem, in terms of fall-related injuries.

Eszopiclone versus zopiclone in the treatment of insomnia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine the therapeutic effects of two selective GABA-A agonists, zopiclone and eszopiclone, in the treatment of insomnia. METHODS: This study comprised a phase III, single-center, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Patients were randomized to receive zopiclone 7.5 mg or eszopiclone 3 mg, both orally, for four weeks. In total, 199 patients were evaluated during two visits and then followed for at least six weeks. The primary endpoint was the Insomnia Severity Index after four weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints were obtained through polysomnography data, including total sleep time, sleep latency and sleep efficiency. The frequency of adverse events was also analyzed. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01100164. RESULTS: The primary efficacy analysis demonstrated the non-inferiority of eszopiclone over zopiclone. Analysis of objective parameters assessed by polysomnography showed that eszopiclone increased total sleep time and also improved sleep efficiency. The safety profile of both study treatments was similar and the most common events reported in both groups were dysgeusia, headache, dizziness, irritability and nausea. Adverse events were observed in 223 patients, 109 (85.2%) in the eszopiclone group and 114 (87.7%) in the zopiclone group. CONCLUSION: Based on the Insomnia Severity Index at the end of four weeks of treatment, eszopiclone demonstrated efficacy comparable to that of zopiclone in the treatment of insomnia, increasing total sleep time as well as sleep efficiency according to polysomnography.

Eszopiclone versus zopiclone in the treatment of insomnia

OBJECTIVE: To determine the therapeutic effects of two selective GABA-A agonists, zopiclone and eszopiclone, in the treatment of insomnia. METHODS: This study comprised a phase III, single-center, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority trial. Patients were randomized to receive zopiclone 7.5 mg or eszopiclone 3 mg, both orally, for four weeks. In total, 199 patients were evaluated during two visits and then followed for at least six weeks. The primary endpoint was the Insomnia Severity Index after four weeks of treatment. Secondary endpoints were obtained through polysomnography data, including total sleep time, sleep latency and sleep efficiency. The frequency of adverse events was also analyzed. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01100164. RESULTS: The primary efficacy analysis demonstrated the non-inferiority of eszopiclone over zopiclone. Analysis of objective parameters assessed by polysomnography showed that eszopiclone increased total sleep time and also improved sleep efficiency. The safety profile of both study treatments was similar and the most common events reported in both groups were dysgeusia, headache, dizziness, irritability and nausea. Adverse events were observed in 223 patients, 109 (85.2%) in the eszopiclone group and 114 (87.7%) in the zopiclone group. CONCLUSION: Based on the Insomnia Severity Index at the end of four weeks of treatment, eszopiclone demonstrated efficacy comparable to that of zopiclone in the treatment of insomnia, increasing total sleep time as well as sleep efficiency according to polysomnography.