Critical role of eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 1 (EEF1A1) in avian reovirus sigma-C-induced apoptosis and inhibition of viral growth.

Avian reovirus (ARV) causes viral arthritis, chronic respiratory diseases, retarded growth and malabsorption syndrome. It is well established that the ARV sigma-C protein induces apoptosis in host cells. However, the underlying molecular mechanism of this induction is still unclear. We report here the identification of eukaryotic elongation factor 1 alpha 1 (EEF1A1) as the interacting partner of σC. We found that σC-induced apoptosis in DF-1 cells could be completely abolished by knockdown of EEF1A1 by siRNA. Furthermore, knockdown of EEF1A1 markedly reduced ARV-induced apoptosis associated with decreased caspase-9 and -3 activation and cytochrome C release, leading to increased ARV growth in host cells. Thus, EEF1A1 plays a critical role in σC-induced apoptosis and inhibition of viral growth.

Eukaryotic translation elongation factor 1A induces anoikis by triggering cell detachment.

Anoikis, apoptosis because of loss of cell anchorage, is crucial for tissue homeostasis. Fibronectin not only provides a scaffold for cell anchorage but also harbors a cryptic antiadhesive site capable of inducing ß1-integrin inactivation. In this study, this cryptic antiadhesive site is implicated in spontaneous induction of anoikis. Nontransformed fibroblasts (NIH3T3) adhering to a fibronectin substratum underwent anoikis during serum starvation culture. This anoikis was caused by proteolytic exposure of the cryptic antiadhesive site in fibronectin by matrix metalloproteinase. Eukaryotic elongation factor 1A (eEF1A) was identified as a membrane receptor for the exposed antiadhesive site. Serum starvation raised the membrane residence of eEF1A, and siRNA-based disruption of this increase rendered cells anoikis-resistant. By contrast, cells became more susceptible to anoikis in parallel with increased membrane residence of eEF1A by enforced expression. These results demonstrate that eEF1A acts as a membrane receptor for the cryptic antiadhesive site of fibronectin, which contributes to cell regulation, including anoikis, through negative regulation of cell anchorage.

Initiation context modulates autoregulation of eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1 (eIF1).

The central feature of standard eukaryotic translation initiation is small ribosome subunit loading at the 5' cap followed by its 5' to 3' scanning for a start codon. The preferred start is an AUG codon in an optimal context. Elaborate cellular machinery exists to ensure the fidelity of start codon selection. Eukaryotic initiation factor 1 (eIF1) plays a central role in this process. Here we show that the translation of eIF1 homologs in eukaryotes from diverse taxa involves initiation from an AUG codon in a poor context. Using human eIF1 as a model, we show that this poor context is necessary for an autoregulatory negative feedback loop in which a high level of eIF1 inhibits its own translation, establishing that variability in the stringency of start codon selection is used for gene regulation in eukaryotes. We show that the stringency of start codon selection (preferential utilization of optimal start sites) is increased to a surprising degree by overexpressing eIF1. The capacity for the cellular level of eIF1 to impact initiation through the variable stringency of initiation codon selection likely has significant consequences for the proteome in eukaryotes.

Sulfolobus solfataricus translation initiation factor 1 stimulates translation initiation complex formation.

The eukaryotic translation initiation factor 1 binds to the ribosome during translation initiation. It is instrumental for initiator-tRNA and mRNA binding, and has a function in selection of the authentic start codon. Here, we show that the archaeal homolog aIF1 has analogous functions. The aIF1 protein of the archaeon Sulfolobus solfataricus is bound to the small ribosomal subunit during translation initiation and accelerates binding of initiator-tRNA and mRNA to the ribosome. Accordingly, aIF1 stimulated translation of an mRNA in a S. solfataricus in vitro translation system. Moreover, this study suggested that the C terminus of the factor is of relevance for its function.

Communication between eukaryotic translation initiation factors 5 and 1A within the ribosomal pre-initiation complex plays a role in start site selection.

During eukaryotic translation initiation, the 43 S ribosomal pre-initiation complex scans the mRNA in search of an AUG codon at which to begin translation. Start codon recognition halts scanning and triggers a number of events that commit the complex to beginning translation at that point on the mRNA. Previous studies in vitro and in vivo have indicated that eukaryotic initiation factors (eIFs) 1, 2 and 5 play key roles in these events. In addition, it was reported recently that the C-terminal domain of eIF1A is involved in maintaining the fidelity of start codon recognition. The molecular mechanisms by which these factors work together to ensure fidelity of start site selection remain poorly understood. Here, we report the quantitative characterization of energetic interactions between eIF1A, eIF5 and the AUG codon in an in vitro reconstituted yeast translation initiation system. Our results show that recognition of an AUG codon by the 43 S complex triggers an interaction between eIF5 and eIF1A, resulting in a shift in the equilibrium between two states of the pre-initiation complex. This AUG-dependent change may be a reorganization from a scanning-competent state to a scanning-incompetent state. Mutations in both eIF1A and eIF5 that increase initiation at non-AUG codons in vivo weaken the interaction between the two factors upon AUG recognition, while specifically strengthening it in response to a UUG codon. These data suggest strongly that the interaction between eIF1A and eIF5 is involved in maintaining the fidelity of start codon recognition in vivo.

Physical and functional interaction between the eukaryotic orthologs of prokaryotic translation initiation factors IF1 and IF2.

To initiate protein synthesis, a ribosome with bound initiator methionyl-tRNA must be assembled at the start codon of an mRNA. This process requires the coordinated activities of three translation initiation factors (IF) in prokaryotes and at least 12 translation initiation factors in eukaryotes (eIF). The factors eIF1A and eIF5B from eukaryotes show extensive amino acid sequence similarity to the factors IF1 and IF2 from prokaryotes. By a combination of two-hybrid, coimmunoprecipitation, and in vitro binding assays eIF1A and eIF5B were found to interact directly, and the eIF1A binding site was mapped to the C-terminal region of eIF5B. This portion of eIF5B was found to be critical for growth in vivo and for translation in vitro. Overexpression of eIF1A exacerbated the slow-growth phenotype of yeast strains expressing C-terminally truncated eIF5B. These findings indicate that the physical interaction between the evolutionarily conserved factors eIF1A and eIF5B plays an important role in translation initiation, perhaps to direct or stabilize the binding of methionyl-tRNA to the ribosomal P site.

Eukaryotic ribosomes require initiation factors 1 and 1A to locate initiation codons.

The scanning model of translation initiation is a coherent description of how eukaryotic ribosomes reach the initiation codon after being recruited to the capped 5' end of messenger RNA. Five eukaryotic initiation factors (eIF 2, 3, 4A, 4B and 4F) with established functions have been assumed to be sufficient to mediate this process. Here we report that eIF1 and eIF1A are also both essential for translation initiation. In their absence, 43S ribosomal preinitiation complexes incubated with ATP, eIF4A, eIF4B and eIF4F bind exclusively to the cap-proximal region but are unable to reach the initiation codon. Individually, eIF1A enhances formation of this cap-proximal complex, and eIF1 weakly promotes formation of a 48S ribosomal complex at the initiation codon. These proteins act synergistically to mediate assembly of ribosomal initiation complexes at the initiation codon and dissociate aberrant complexes from the mRNA.

Induction of mesoderm in Xenopus laevis embryos by translation initiation factor 4E.

The microinjection of messenger RNA encoding the eukaryotic translation initiation factor 4E (eIF-4E) into early embryos of Xenopus laevis leads to the induction of mesoderm in ectodermal explants. This induction occurs without a stimulation of overall protein synthesis and is blocked by the co-expression of a dominant negative mutant of the proto-oncogene ras or a truncated activin type II receptor. Although other translation factors have been studied in vertebrate and invertebrate embryos, none have been shown to play a direct role in development. The results here suggest a mechanism for relaying and amplifying signals for mesoderm induction.

An inhibitor of elongation factor G (EF-G) GTPase present in the ribosome wash of Escherichia coli: a complex of initiation factors IF1 and IF3?

An inhibitor of elongation factor G (EF-G) GTPase isolated from the ribosome wash of Escherichia coli was shown to stimulate the poly(A,U,G)- and initiation factor 2 (IF2)-dependent binding of N-formyl-[35S]Met-tRNAfMet to ribosomes. In the presence of saturating amounts of the EF-G GTPase inhibitor, neither addition of initiation factor 1 (IF1) nor addition of initiation factor 3 (IF3) caused a further stimulation of the formation of N-formyl-[35S]Met-tRNAfMET/poly(A,U,G)/ribosome complexes. Both IF1 and IF3 were shown to inhibit ribosome-dependent EF-G GTPase, especially when both initiation factors were added either in absence or in the presence of initiation factor 2 (IF2), poly(A,U,G) and N-formyl-Met-tRNAfMet. Therefore, we conclude that the EF-G GTPase inhibitor consisting of two polypeptide subunits with apparent molecular masses of 23,000 and 10,000 Da is a complex of initiation factors IF1 and IF3. The inhibition of EF-G GTPAse by IF3, but not the effects of IF1 in the presence or absence of IF3 could be reversed by increasing the Mg(2+)-concentration as already shown for the EF-G GTPase inhibitor. Therefore, IF1 as well as the EF-G GTPase inhibitor do not influence the ribosome-dependent EF-G GTPase by affecting the association of ribosomal subunits.