Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 347
2.
Br J Radiol ; 94(1123): 20201269, 2021 Jul 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34106750

OBJECTIVES: To compare diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in paediatric fluoroscopy at a secondary referral centre with 2018 European guidelines. Secondly, to compare secondary referral centre DRLs for paediatric fluoroscopy examinations not included in European guidelines with 2010 national UK DRLs. METHODS: Paediatric fluoroscopy studies were grouped by age (groups: 0, 1, 5, 10, 15 years) for examination type and analysed retrospectively, over a period of 14 years. DRLs were compared with European DRLs (micturating cystourethrograms (MCUs)) and 2010 UK national DRLs (contrast swallows and meals). RESULTS: 1,586 studies were performed (49% MCUs; 31% meals; 9% swallows). For all age groups, DRLs for MCUs were lower than European DRLs by up to a factor 58 x (1 year age group: secondary referral centre DRL 12 mGycm2 vs European DRL 700 mGycm2). For contrast swallows and meals, 75th percentile doses were lower than 2010 UK national 25th percentile doses in all age groups. CONCLUSION: Maintaining low doses of ionising radiation is particularly important in paediatrics, and our study has found that it is possible to achieve low paediatric fluoroscopy doses in a secondary referral centre setting. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Our data may prove useful to other centres and could contribute towards future European DRLs.


Diagnostic Reference Levels , Fluoroscopy/standards , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Referral and Consultation , Adolescent , Child , Child, Preschool , Europe , Female , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Radiation Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Secondary Care Centers
3.
Turk Neurosurg ; 31(1): 119-123, 2021.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33372261

AIM: To compare the efficacies of fluoroscopy- and ultrasound (US)-guided caudal epidural steroid injections (CESIs) in patients with chronic low back pain (LBP). MATERIAL AND METHODS: This study included patients with chronic LBP who underwent US- (Group U; n = 90) or fluoroscopyguided (Group F; n = 90) CESI. The procedure time, successful injection rate on the first attempt, complication rate, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score, and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score before CESI and after 3 weeks and 3 months of CESI were analyzed. RESULTS: NRS and ODI scores improved at 3 weeks (p < 0.001) and 3 months (p < 0.001) after CESIs. No significant differences were noted between the two groups for the NRS (p=0.22 and p=0.47) and ODI (p=0.58, p=0.22) scores. Moreover, the CESI procedure time was significantly shorter (p < 0.001) and the successful injection rate on the first attempt was significantly higher (p=0.002) in Group U than in Group F. The complication rate difference was statistically insignificant between the two groups (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Outcomes of US-guided CESI were superior than those of fluoroscopy-guided CESI considering the successful injection rate on the first attempt and procedure time. In addition, US-guided CESI was as effective as fluoroscopy-guided CESI and did not expose patients and practitioners to radiation.


Anesthesia, Epidural/methods , Chronic Pain/diagnostic imaging , Chronic Pain/drug therapy , Low Back Pain/diagnostic imaging , Low Back Pain/drug therapy , Adult , Aged , Anesthesia, Epidural/standards , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Fluoroscopy/standards , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Injections, Epidural/methods , Injections, Epidural/standards , Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring/methods , Intraoperative Neurophysiological Monitoring/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Steroids/administration & dosage , Ultrasonography/methods , Ultrasonography/standards
4.
Radiol Med ; 126(1): 99-105, 2021 Jan.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32239471

OBJECTIVES: The diagnostic reference level (DRL) is a useful tool for the optimisation of medical exposures. Thus, a Working Party coordinated by the Italian National Institute of Health and the National Workers Compensation Authority has been formed to provide Italian DRLs, for both diagnostic and interventional procedures, to be used as appropriate for the implementation of the 2013/59 European Directive into the national regulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The multidisciplinary Working Party was formed by professionals involved in diagnostic and interventional radiology medical exposures and started from a critical revision of both the literature and the results of previous Italian surveys. The procedures were divided into five sections for adult (projection radiography, mammography, diagnostic fluoroscopy, CT and interventional radiology) and two sections for paediatric patients (projection radiography and CT). The provided DRL values have been identified for "normal" adult patients and for age-classes of paediatric patients. RESULTS: Some of the DRL values provided by the Working Party are reported in this study as an example, divided by adult/paediatric patients, radiological technique and examination: specifically, DRLs for new radiological practices and new dose quantities as DRLs metric were introduced. The median value (rather than the mean) for each procedure, derived from a sample of patients, has to be compared with the corresponding DRL value, and dosimetric data related to a minimum number of patients should be collected for each examination. CONCLUSIONS: The approach to the definition and use of DRLs through guidelines of national Authorities in collaboration with scientific Associations should simplify the periodical updating and could be useful for keeping the optimisation of medical exposures faithful to the development of radiological practice.


Diagnostic Reference Levels , Fluoroscopy/standards , Mammography/standards , Radiology, Interventional/standards , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , Humans , Italy , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiometry
5.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 46(8): 530-537, 2021 Apr 15.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33273435

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of a single-center consecutive series of patients. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that using a mobile intraoperative computed tomography in combination with spinal navigation would result in better accuracy of lateral mass and pedicle screws between C3 and T5 levels, compared to cone-beam computed tomography and traditional 2D fluoroscopy. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Use of spinal navigation associated with 3D imaging has been shown to improve accuracy of screw positioning in the cervico-thoracic region. However, use of iCT imaging compared to a cone-beam CT has not been fully investigated in these types of surgical interventions. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a series of patients who underwent posterior cervico-thoracic fixations using different intraoperative imaging systems in a single hospital. We identified three different groups of patients: Group A, operated under 2D-fluoroscopic guidance without navigation; Group B: O-arm guidance with navigation; Group C: iCT AIRO guidance with navigation. Primary outcome was the rate of accurately placed screws, measured on intra or postoperative CT scan with Neo et al. classification for cervical pedicles screws and Gertzbein et al. for thoracic pedicle screws. Screws in cervical lateral masses were evaluated according to a new classification created by the authors. RESULTS: Data on 67 patients and 495 screws were available. Overall screw accuracy was 92.8% (95.6% for lateral mass screws, 81.6% for cervical pedicle screws, and 90% for thoracic pedicle screws). Patients operated with iCT AIRO navigation had significantly fewer misplaced screws (2.4%) compared to 2D-fluoroscopic guidance (9.1%) and O-arm navigation (9.7%) (P = 0.0152). Accuracy rate of iCT navigation versus O-arm navigation was significantly higher (P = 0.0042), and there was no statistically significant difference in surgical time between the three Groups (P = 0.5390). CONCLUSION: Use of high-quality CT associated with spinal navigation significantly improved accuracy of screw positioning in the cervico-thoracic region.Level of Evidence: 3.


Cervical Vertebrae/surgery , Monitoring, Intraoperative/standards , Neuronavigation/standards , Pedicle Screws , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards , Adolescent , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cervical Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Fluoroscopy/standards , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Monitoring, Intraoperative/methods , Neuronavigation/methods , Retrospective Studies , Spinal Fusion/methods , Spinal Fusion/standards , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/standards , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Young Adult
7.
Chiropr Man Therap ; 28(1): 62, 2020 11 24.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33228737

BACKGROUND: Understanding the mechanisms underlying chronic, nonspecific low back pain (CNSLBP) is essential to advance personalized care and identify the most appropriate intervention. Recently, two intervertebral motion biomarkers termed "Motion Sharing Inequality" (MSI) and "Motion Sharing Variability" (MSV) have been identified for CNSLBP using quantitative fluoroscopy (QF). The aim of this study was to conduct intra- and inter-investigator analytic repeatability studies to determine the extent to which investigator error affects their measurement in clinical studies. METHODS: A cross-sectional cohort study was conducted using the image sequences of 30 healthy controls who received QF screening during passive recumbent flexion motion. Two independent investigators analysed the image sequences for MSI and MSV from October to November 2018. Intra and inter- investigator repeatability studies were performed using intraclass correlations (ICC), standard errors of measurement (SEM) and minimal differences (MD). RESULTS: Intra-investigator ICCs were 0.90 (0.81,0.95) (SEM 0.029) and 0.78 (0.59,0.89) (SEM 0.020) for MSI and MSV, respectively. Inter-investigator ICCs 0.93 (0.86,0.97) (SEM 0.024) and 0.55 (0.24,0.75) (SEM 0.024). SEMs for MSI and MSV were approximately 10 and 30% of their group means respectively. The MDs for MSI for intra- and inter-investigator repeatability were 0.079 and 0.067, respectively and for MSV 0.055 and 0.067. CONCLUSIONS: MSI demonstrated substantial intra- and inter-investigator repeatability, suggesting that investigator input has a minimal influence on its measurement. MSV demonstrated moderate intra-investigator reliability and fair inter-investigator repeatability. Confirmation in patients with CNSLBP is now required.


Fluoroscopy/standards , Low Back Pain/diagnosis , Adult , Aged , Biomarkers/analysis , Chronic Disease , Cohort Studies , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Healthy Volunteers , Humans , Low Back Pain/physiopathology , Male , Middle Aged , Range of Motion, Articular , Reproducibility of Results , Young Adult
8.
Phys Med Biol ; 65(22): 225037, 2020 12 05.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32937602

This work aims to assess the efficacy of x-ray quality assurance tests undertaken on fluoroscopy units in the UK. Information was gathered on the results of image quality tests recommended by the reports of the Institute of Physics and Engineering in Medicine, and those additionally undertaken by medical physics departments. The assessment of efficacy considers the frequency with which a test result breaches the remedial level or other relevant threshold where applicable. The third quartile of those results exceeding the remedial level or threshold is used to estimate the severity of such a breach in terms of potential impact on patient dose and image quality. A risk assessment approach is then used to recommend to what degree, if any, the test should be included in an on-going test regimen. Data was analysed from 469 testing sessions to 337 unique fluoroscopy units throughout the UK. Across all tests, the rate with which the remedial level was exceeded varied from 0-10.6%, with severity ranging from little or none to major degradation to image quality or significant increase on population dose. Where possible, the data has also been used to produce representative ranges for the results of image quality tests. These could be useful as an up to date comparator for those sites considering the purchase of or commissioning new equipment. Overall the results indicate a wide range for the efficacy of those tests undertaken at present; this can be used to review local test protocols and to inform future changes to national guidance in the UK. The results also highlight some tests where measurement technique varies significantly throughout the UK, making any valid comparison difficult. This may indicate a need for further guidance on how best to undertake these tests.


Fluoroscopy/standards , Societies, Medical , Humans , Quality Control , Research Report , Risk Assessment
9.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 60(6): 837-842, 2020 Dec.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32912764

OBJECTIVE: The International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) has highlighted the large number of medical specialties using fluoroscopy outside imaging departments without programmes of radiation protection (RP) for patients and staff. Vascular surgery is one of these specialties and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR) is one of the most challenging procedures requiring RP guidance and optimisation actions. The recent European Directive on Basic Safety Standards requires the use and regular update of diagnostic reference levels (DRL) for interventional procedures. The objective of the study was to know the doses of patients undergoing EVAR with mobile Xray systems and with hybrid rooms (fixed Xray systems), to obtain national DRLs and suggest optimisation actions. METHODS: The Spanish Chapter of Endovascular Surgery launched a national survey that involved hospitals for 10 autonomous communities representing the 77% of the Spanish population (46.7 million inhabitants). Patient dose values from mobile Xray systems were available from nine hospitals (sample of 165 EVAR procedures) and data from hybrid rooms, from seven hospitals, with dosimetric data from 123 procedures. The initial national DRLs have been obtained, as the third quartile of the median values from the different centres involved in the survey. RESULTS: The proposed national DRLs are 278 Gy cm2 for hybrid rooms and 87 Gy cm2 for mobile Xray systems, and for cumulative air kerma (cumulative AK) at the patient entrance reference point, 1403 mGy for hybrid rooms, and 292 mGy for mobile systems. CONCLUSION: An audit of patient doses for EVAR procedures to identify optimised imaging protocol strategies is needed. It is also appropriate to evaluate the diagnostic information required for EVAR procedures. The increase by a factor of 3.2 (for kerma area product) and 4.8 (for cumulative AK) in the DRLs needs to be justified when the procedures are performed in the hybrid rooms rather than with mobile Xray systems.


Aneurysm/diagnostic imaging , Endovascular Procedures , Fluoroscopy/standards , Radiation Exposure/standards , Reference Standards , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Aneurysm/surgery , Fluoroscopy/instrumentation , Humans , Middle Aged , Patient Safety , Point-of-Care Systems/standards , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiometry , Spain
10.
World Neurosurg ; 143: e492-e502, 2020 11.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32758652

OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) are used to stabilize the spine after interbody fusion in minimally invasive approaches. Recently, robotic assistance has been developed to improve the accuracy of PPS. We report our initial experience with ExcelsiusGPS and compare its accuracy with our historical cohort of fluoroscopy-guided PPS. METHODS: We reviewed prospectively collected data from our first 100 robot-assisted PPS. We graded accuracy of screws on computed tomography imaging and compared it with a previous cohort of 90 PPS placed using fluoroscopy. We also analyzed the effect of various demographic and perioperative metrics on accuracy. RESULTS: We placed 103 PPS in the first 20 consecutive patients with postoperative computed tomography imaging using ExcelsiusGPS. All screws were placed at L2 to S1. Our robot-assisted cohort had 6 breaches, with only 2 breaches >2 mm, yielding an overall breach rate of 5.8% and a significant breach rate of 1.9%. In comparison, our fluoroscopy-guided cohort had a breach rate of 3.3% and a significant breach rate of 1.1%, which was not significantly different. More breaches occurred in the first half of cases, suggesting a learning curve with robotic assistance. No demographic or perioperative metrics had a significant effect on accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Our breach rates with ExcelsiusGPS were low and consistent with others reported in the literature, as well as with other robotic systems. Our series shows equivalent accuracy of placement of PPS with this robotic platform compared with fluoroscopic guidance and suggests a relatively short learning curve.


Fluoroscopy/standards , Lumbar Vertebrae/surgery , Pedicle Screws/standards , Robotic Surgical Procedures/standards , Sacrum/surgery , Spinal Fusion/standards , Adult , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Cohort Studies , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Male , Middle Aged , Prospective Studies , Retrospective Studies , Robotic Surgical Procedures/methods , Sacrum/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Fusion/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards
11.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976) ; 45(17): E1085-E1090, 2020 Sep 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32355149

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparison between an interventional and a control cohort. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate whether the use of an augmented reality surgical navigation (ARSN) system for pedicle screw (PS) placement in deformity cases could alter the total implant density and PS to hook ratio compared to free-hand (FH) technique. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgical navigation in deformity surgery provides the possibility to place PS in small and deformed pedicles were hooks would otherwise have been placed, and thereby achieve a higher screw density in the constructs that may result in better long-term patient outcomes. METHODS: Fifteen deformity cases treated with ARSN were compared to 29 cases treated by FH. All surgeries were performed by the same orthopedic spine surgeon. PS, hook, and combined implant density were primary outcomes. Procedure time, deformity correction, length of hospital stay, and blood loss were secondary outcomes. The surgeries in the ARSN group were performed in a hybrid operating room (OR) with a ceiling-mounted robotic C-arm with integrated video cameras for AR navigation. The FH group was operated with or without fluoroscopy as deemed necessary by the surgeon. RESULTS: Both groups had an overall high-density construct (>80% total implant density). The ARSN group, had a significantly higher PS density, 86.3% ±â€Š14.6% versus 74.7% ±â€Š13.9% in the FH group (P < 0.05), whereas the hook density was 2.2% ±â€Š3.0% versus 9.7% ±â€Š9.6% (P < 0.001). Neither the total procedure time (min) 431 ±â€Š98 versus 417 ±â€Š145 nor the deformity correction 59.3% ±â€Š16.6% versus 60.1% ±â€Š17.8% between the groups were significantly affected. CONCLUSION: This study indicates that ARSN enables the surgeon to increase the PS density and thereby minimize the use of hooks in deformity surgery without prolonging the OR time. This may result in better constructs with possible long-term advantage and less need for revision surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.


Augmented Reality , Pedicle Screws , Spinal Diseases/diagnostic imaging , Spinal Diseases/surgery , Surgeons , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/methods , Adolescent , Adult , Cohort Studies , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Fluoroscopy/standards , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Male , Middle Aged , Reoperation/methods , Reoperation/standards , Retrospective Studies , Surgeons/standards , Surgery, Computer-Assisted/standards , Thoracic Vertebrae/diagnostic imaging , Thoracic Vertebrae/surgery
12.
Acta Neurochir (Wien) ; 162(8): 1871-1878, 2020 08.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32300988

BACKGROUND: Stereotactic registration is the most critical step ensuring accuracy in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. 3D fluoroscopy (XT) is emerging as an alternative to CT. XT has been shown to be safe and effective for intraoperative confirmation of lead position following implantation. However, there is a lack of studies evaluating the suitability of XT to be used for the more crucial step of registration and its capability of being merged to a preoperative MRI. This is the first study comparing accuracy, efficiency, and radiation exposure of XT- vs CT-based stereotactic registration and XT/MRI merging in deep brain stimulation. METHODS: Mean absolute differences and Euclidean distance between planned (adjusted for intraoperative testing) and actual lead trajectories were calculated for accuracy of implantation. The radiation dose from each scan was recorded as the dose length product (DLP). Efficiency was measured as the time between the patient entering the operating room and the initial skin incision. A one-way ANOVA compared these parameters between patients that had either CT- or XT-based registration. RESULTS: Forty-one patients underwent DBS surgery-25 in the CT group and 16 in the XT group. The mean absolute difference between CT and XT was not statistically significant in the x (p = 0.331), y (p = 0.951), or z (p = 0.807) directions. The Euclidean distance between patient groups did not differ significantly (p = 0.874). The average radiation exposure with XT (220.0 ± 0.1 mGy*cm) was significantly lower than CT (1269.3 ± 112.9 mGy*cm) (p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in registration time between CT (107.8 ± 23.1 min) and XT (106.0 ± 18.2 min) (p = 0.518). CONCLUSION: XT-based frame registration was shown to result in similar implantation accuracy and significantly less radiation exposure compared with CT. Our results surprisingly showed no significant difference in registration time, but this may be due to a learning curve effect.


Deep Brain Stimulation/methods , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/methods , Stereotaxic Techniques , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/methods , Adult , Deep Brain Stimulation/instrumentation , Electrodes, Implanted , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Fluoroscopy/standards , Humans , Imaging, Three-Dimensional/standards , Male , Middle Aged , Sensitivity and Specificity , Tomography, X-Ray Computed/standards
13.
Phys Med ; 71: 150-160, 2020 Mar.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32146285

Assessment of fluoroscopic image quality has not kept pace with technological developments in interventional imaging equipment. Access to 'for presentation' data on these systems has motivated this investigation into a novel quantitative method of measuring image quality. We have developed a statistical algorithm as an alternative to subjective assessment using threshold contrast detail detectability techniques. Using sets of uniformity exposed fluoroscopy frames, the algorithm estimates the minimum contrast necessary for conspicuity of a range of virtual target object areas A. Pixel mean value distributions in a central image region are Gaussian, with standard deviation σ Pixel binning produces background distributions with area A. For 95% confidence of conspicuity a target object must exhibit a minimum contrast of 3.29σ. A range of threshold contrasts are calculated for a range of virtual areas. Analysis on a few seconds of fluoroscopy data is performed remotely and no test object is required. In this study Threshold Index and Contrast Detail curves were calculated for different incident air kerma rates at the detector, different levels of electronic magnification and different types of image processing. A limited number of direct comparisons were made with subjective assessments using the Leeds TO.10 test object. Results obtained indicate that the statistical algorithm is not only more sensitive to changes in levels of detector dose rate and magnification, but also to levels of image processing, including edge-enhancement. Threshold Index curves thus produced could be used as an interventional system optimisation tool and to objectively compare image quality between vendor systems.


Algorithms , Fluoroscopy/standards , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Humans , Normal Distribution , Radiographic Image Enhancement/methods , Signal-To-Noise Ratio
14.
Health Phys ; 118(1): 85-95, 2020 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31764423

To establish diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) and investigate deterministic and stochastic risks in pediatric interventional cardiology (IC) procedures. Exposure parameters were retrospectively reviewed for 373 patients treated between May 2016 and November 2018 at a single specialized hospital. Weight specific DRLs were derived for pediatric IC procedures. Additionally, peak skin dose (Dskin,max) was measured using thermoluminescent dosimeters for a sample of 7 diagnostic and 43 therapeutic procedures. Finally, using PCXMC software, organ doses were computed and the risk of exposure-induced cancer death (REID) was estimated using the risk models of the Biological Effects of Ionizing Radiation VII committee. DRLs for ventricular septal defect (VSD) occlusions, lacking in the literature, in terms of air kerma at patient entrance reference point (388 and 629 mGy) and total air kerma-area product (28 and 61 Gycm) were proposed for patients weight-groups 5 - < 15 kg and 15 - < 30 kg, respectively. The mean (range) Dskin,max was 15 (1-30) mGy and 94 (1-491) mGy for diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, respectively. Meanwhile, VSD occlusion involved the highest organ doses where the lungs, liver, stomach, and breasts mean doses were 57, 37, 6, and 10 mGy, respectively, and the associated REID were 0.5% and 0.3% in female and male patients, respectively. DRLs were proposed for pediatric IC procedures; these will help optimize patient exposure. Dskin,max values were lower than the 2 Gy threshold for skin injuries. Pediatric organ doses and the REID were the highest during VSD occlusion and may be critical for repetitive procedures.


Cardiology/standards , Fluoroscopy/standards , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnosis , Organs at Risk/radiation effects , Radiography, Interventional/standards , Adolescent , Body Weight , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiology/methods , Child , Child, Preschool , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnostic imaging , Heart Defects, Congenital/surgery , Humans , Infant , Infant, Newborn , Male , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Monitoring , Radiography, Interventional/methods , Reference Values , Retrospective Studies
15.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 20(10): 172-180, 2019 Oct.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31593338

Modern fluoroscopes pose a challenge for the clinical physicist for annual testing and continued upkeep. These fluoroscopes are critical to providing care to patients for complex interventions, and continue to evolve in automated image quality adjustments. Few tools in software or hardware currently exist to assist the physicist or technologist in gauging fluoroscope constancy or readiness for procedures. Many modalities such as mammography, computed tomography or even magnetic resonance imaging are much more evolved with respect to testing or quality control. In this work we sought to provide simple reproducible tools and methods for spot evaluating or continued quality testing of interventional fluoroscopes.


Fluoroscopy/methods , Fluoroscopy/standards , Phantoms, Imaging , Quality Control , Radiography, Interventional/methods , Signal-To-Noise Ratio , Humans , Image Processing, Computer-Assisted/methods , Radiation Dosage , Retrospective Studies , Software
16.
PLoS One ; 14(7): e0220359, 2019.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31365573

INTRODUCTION: Cardiac catheterization procedures result in high radiation doses and often multiple procedures are necessary for congenital heart disease patients. However, diagnostic reference levels (DRL) remain scarce. Our first goal was finding the optimal DRL parameter and determining appropriate DRLs. The second goal was to calculate organ doses (OD), effective doses (ED) and lifetime attributable risks (LAR) per procedure and to provide conversion factors based on dose area product (DAP). MATERIALS AND METHODS: DRLs are calculated for each procedure type, as the 75th percentile of the cumulative value per procedure from the corresponding parameter. All irradiation events in the DICOM Structured Reports were automatically processed and simulated using PCXMC, resulting in OD, ED and LAR. Using a Kruskal Wallis H test and subsequent pairwise comparisons, differences in median values of the DRL parameter between procedure types were assessed. RESULTS: Linear regression showed a strong correlation and narrow confidence interval between DAP and product of body weight and fluoroscopy time (BWxFT), even when all procedures (diagnostic and interventional) are combined. Only 15% of the pairwise comparisons were statistically significant for DAP normalized to BWxFT (DAPBWxFT). The latter pairs contained less frequent procedure types with significant outliers. For DAP normalized to BW (DAPBW), 38% of the pairwise comparisons showed statistically significant differences. Conversion factors from DAPBW to OD and ED were reported for various weight groups, due to the higher correlation between DAPBW and both OD and ED than between DAP and both OD and ED. CONCLUSIONS: The P75 of DAPBWxFT for all procedures combined serves as an appropriate DRL value. This facilitates local DRL determination in smaller paediatric centres, which often have insufficient data to produce appropriate DRLs for different procedure types. Conversion factors are more reliable starting from DAPBW instead of DAP and should be used according to the appropriate BW group.


Fluoroscopy/methods , Heart Defects, Congenital/diagnosis , Body Weight , Cardiac Catheterization/methods , Cardiac Catheterization/standards , Child , Female , Fluoroscopy/standards , Heart Defects, Congenital/mortality , Heart Defects, Congenital/surgery , Humans , Linear Models , Male , Radiation Dosage , Radiography, Interventional , Reference Values , Risk Assessment
17.
Pol Arch Intern Med ; 129(6): 399-407, 2019 06 28.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31169259

INTRODUCTION: Radiofrequency ablation (RFA) of outflow tract ventricular arrhythmia (VA) that originates from the aortic cusps can be challenging. Data on long­ term efficacy and safety as well as optimal technique after aortic cusp ablation have not previously been reported. OBJECTIVES: This aim of the study was to determine the short- and long­ term outcomes after RFA of aortic cusp VA, and to evaluate aortic valve injuries according to echocardiographic screening. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective multicenter registry (AVATAR, Aortic Cusp Ventricular Arrhythmias: Long Term Safety and Outcome from a Multicenter Prospective Ablation Registry) study. A total of 103 patients at a mean age of 56 years (34-64) from the "Electra" Registry (2005-2017) undergoing RFA of aortic cusps VA were enrolled. The following 3 ablation techniques were used: zero­fluoroscopy (ZF; electroanatomical mapping [EAM] without fluoroscopy), EAM with fluoroscopy, and conventional fluoroscopy­ based RFA. Data on clinical history, complications after RFA, echocardiography, and 24­ hour Holter monitoring were collected. The follow up was 12 months or longer. RESULTS: There were no major acute cardiac complications after RFA. In one case, a vascular access complication required surgery. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) procedure time was 75 minutes (IQR, 58-95), median follow­ up, 32 months (IQR, 12-70). Acute and long term procedural success rates were 93% and 86%, respectively. The long­ term RFA outcomes were observed in ZF technique (88%), EAM with fluoroscopy (86%), and conventional RFA (82%), without differences. During long­ term follow­up, no abnormalities were found within the aortic root. CONCLUSIONS: Ablation of VA within the aortic cusps is safe and effective in long­ term follow up. The ZF approach is feasible, although it requires greater expertise and more imaging modalities.


Arrhythmias, Cardiac/surgery , Catheter Ablation/standards , Fluoroscopy/standards , Heart Ventricles/physiopathology , Radiofrequency Ablation/standards , Adult , Aged , Catheter Ablation/methods , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Follow-Up Studies , Humans , Male , Middle Aged , Practice Guidelines as Topic , Prospective Studies , Radiofrequency Ablation/methods , Registries , Treatment Outcome
18.
JACC Clin Electrophysiol ; 5(5): 626-634, 2019 05.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31122386

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine whether a radiation safety time-out reduces radiation exposure in electrophysiology procedures. BACKGROUND: Time-outs are integral to improving quality and safety. The authors hypothesized that a radiation safety time-out would reduce radiation exposure levels for patients and the health care team members. METHODS: The study was performed at the New York University Langone Health Electrophysiology Lab. Baseline data were collected for 6 months prior to the time-out. On implementation of the time-out, data were collected prospectively with analyses to be performed every 3 months. The primary endpoint was dose area product. The secondary endpoints included reference point dose, fluoroscopy time, use of additional shielding, and use of alternative imaging such as intracardiac and intravascular ultrasound. RESULTS: A total of 1,040 patient cases were included. The median dose area product prior to time-out was 18.7 Gy∙cm2, and the median during the time-out was 14.7 Gy∙cm2, representing a 21% reduction (p = 0.007). The median reference point dose prior to time-out was 163 mGy, and during the time-out was 122 mGy (p = 0.011). The use of sterile disposable protective shields and ultrasound imaging for access increased significantly during the time-out. CONCLUSIONS: A radiation safety time-out significantly reduces radiation exposure in electrophysiology procedures. Electrophysiology laboratories, as well as other areas of cardiovascular medicine using fluoroscopy, should strongly consider the use of radiation safety time-outs to reduce radiation exposure and improve safety.


Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac , Patient Safety , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Exposure , Aged , Aged, 80 and over , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac/methods , Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac/standards , Female , Fluoroscopy/standards , Humans , Male , Prospective Studies , Radiation Exposure/prevention & control , Radiation Exposure/standards , Radiation Exposure/statistics & numerical data , Time Factors
19.
Med Phys ; 46(5): 2286-2297, 2019 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30929254

PURPOSE: Real-time image-guided adaptive radiation therapy (IGART) requires accurate marker segmentation to resolve three-dimensional (3D) motion based on two-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopic images. Most common marker segmentation methods require prior knowledge of marker properties to construct a template. If marker properties are not known, an additional learning period is required to build the template which exposes the patient to an additional imaging dose. This work investigates a deep learning-based fiducial marker classifier for use in real-time IGART that requires no prior patient-specific data or additional learning periods. The proposed tracking system uses convolutional neural network (CNN) models to segment cylindrical and arbitrarily shaped fiducial markers. METHODS: The tracking system uses a tracking window approach to perform sliding window classification of each implanted marker. Three cylindrical marker training datasets were generated from phantom kilovoltage (kV) and patient intrafraction images with increasing levels of megavoltage (MV) scatter. The cylindrical shaped marker CNNs were validated on unseen kV fluoroscopic images from 12 fractions of 10 prostate cancer patients with implanted gold fiducials. For the training and validation of the arbitrarily shaped marker CNNs, cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) projection images from ten fractions of seven lung cancer patients with implanted coiled markers were used. The arbitrarily shaped marker CNNs were trained using three patients and the other four unseen patients were used for validation. The effects of full training using a compact CNN (four layers with learnable weights) and transfer learning using a pretrained CNN (AlexNet, eight layers with learnable weights) were analyzed. Each CNN was evaluated using a Precision-Recall curve (PRC), the area under the PRC plot (AUC), and by the calculation of sensitivity and specificity. The tracking system was assessed using the validation data and the accuracy was quantified by calculating the mean error, root-mean-square error (RMSE) and the 1st and 99th percentiles of the error. RESULTS: The fully trained CNN on the dataset with moderate noise levels had a sensitivity of 99.00% and specificity of 98.92%. Transfer learning of AlexNet resulted in a sensitivity and specificity of 99.42% and 98.13%, respectively, for the same datasets. For the arbitrarily shaped marker CNNs, the sensitivity was 98.58% and specificity was 98.97% for the fully trained CNN. The transfer learning CNN had a sensitivity and specificity of 98.49% and 99.56%, respectively. The CNNs were successfully incorporated into a multiple object tracking system for both cylindrical and arbitrarily shaped markers. The cylindrical shaped marker tracking had a mean RMSE of 1.6 ± 0.2 pixels and 1.3 ± 0.4 pixels in the x- and y-directions, respectively. The arbitrarily shaped marker tracking had a mean RMSE of 3.0 ± 0.5 pixels and 2.2 ± 0.4 pixels in the x- and y-directions, respectively. CONCLUSION: With deep learning CNNs, high classification performances on unseen patient images were achieved for both cylindrical and arbitrarily shaped markers. Furthermore, the application of CNN models to intrafraction monitoring was demonstrated using a simple tracking system. The results demonstrate that CNN models can be used to track markers without prior knowledge of the marker properties or an additional learning period.


Deep Learning , Dose Fractionation, Radiation , Fiducial Markers , Fluoroscopy/standards , Radiotherapy, Image-Guided , Automation , Humans , Male , Prostatic Neoplasms/diagnostic imaging , Prostatic Neoplasms/radiotherapy
20.
Eur J Radiol ; 113: 135-139, 2019 Apr.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30927937

OBJECTIVE: Evaluation and updating of Austrian National Diagnostic Reference Levels (NDRLs). METHODS: A nationwide survey on common conventional radiography and fluoroscopy examinations was conducted. In line with Austrian radiation protection standards, all relevant Austrian hospitals and radiology offices/centers were asked to report a minimum sample of 10 representative dose-area product (DAP) values together with patient weight and fluoroscopy time, if applicable. Examinations included for conventional radiography were skull, chest, abdomen, pelvis, lumbar spine and bedside chest x-ray, for fluoroscopy barium enema (single and double contrast) and swallowing (video). Participants were invited via e-mail, followed up by reminders to increase participation rates. Plausibility checks were performed to increase data quality. 3rd quartiles of facility median and mean DAP were calculated and compared to Austrian and international NDRLs. RESULTS: 59% of invited facilities submitted DAP data, 43% submitted additional data on patient weight and 41% on fluoroscopy time. DAP case numbers varied from 1005 to 2121 for conventional radiography and from 182 to 1380 for fluoroscopy. Average patient weight was 75 kg for conventional radiography and 77 kg for fluoroscopy. CONCLUSION: 3rd quartiles derived from the survey are substantially lower than the old Austrian NDRLs (valid till early 2018). Since 3rd quartiles correspond well to European NDRLs, the update would be in accordance with European DRL harmonisation efforts.


Radiography/standards , Austria , Body Weight/physiology , Data Accuracy , Female , Fluoroscopy/methods , Fluoroscopy/standards , Humans , Lumbar Vertebrae/radiation effects , Male , Pelvis/radiation effects , Physical Examination/methods , Radiation Dosage , Radiation Protection/standards , Radiology , Reference Values , Skull/radiation effects , Surveys and Questionnaires , Thorax/radiation effects
...