Locked-in syndrome following elective cervical foraminotomy: a case report.

INTRODUCTION: There are no previously reported cases of locked-in syndrome occurring following cervical spinal surgery. We describe a case of locked-in syndrome following an elective cervical foraminotomy and discuss potential etiologies and contributing factors to our patient's presentation. CASE PRESENTATION: A 54-year-old male with a history of head and neck cancer and prior anterior cervical discectomy and fusion presented with neck pain following a motor vehicle accident. The patient underwent C4-C7 left-sided cervical posterior foraminotomy with no intraoperative complications. On postoperative day 1, the patient suddenly developed rapidly progressing weakness of the extremities and soon became non-verbal. CT angiography and near-infrared spectroscopy confirmed a basilar artery occlusion and left vertebral artery dissection. On MRI, infarcts involving the bilateral pons, left cerebral hemisphere, and left cerebellar infarct were identified. CONCLUSION: The etiology of locked-in syndrome in our patient remains unclear, but it is likely multifactorial. It is possible that the patient was predisposed to vascular injury from prior radiation therapy to the head and neck. In addition, intraoperative vascular insult may have occurred from vibrational shear stress, in turn leading to a vertebral artery dissection, basilar artery occlusion, and pontine infarct, ultimately resulting in our patient's locked-in state.

Channel-assisted cervical key hole technology combined with ultrasonic bone osteotome versus posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy: a clinical retrospective study.

PURPOSE: The search for more effective and safe treatment methods for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR) has led to the rapid development and increasing popularity of minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MI-PCF). This study aims to compare two important approaches for MI-PCF surgery: the channel-assisted cervical key hole technology combined with ultrasonic bone osteotome (CKH-UBO) and posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (PPECF). METHODS: Data from patients treated with single-level CKH-UBO (n = 35) or PPECF (n = 40) were analyzed. Clinical outcomes, including visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for neck and arm pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), and modified Macnab criteria, were assessed preoperatively, as well as at three days, three months, and one year postoperatively. RESULTS: The percentages of patients with excellent and good outcomes were 97.14% and 92.5%, respectively. The average surgical time in the CKH-UBO group was significantly shorter than in the PPECF group (p < 0.001), while the average incision length in the PPECF group was significantly smaller than in the CKH-UBO group. There were no significant differences between the two groups in terms of blood loss, hospital stay, and clinical outcomes at three days, three months, and 12 months postoperatively. CONCLUSION: CKH-UBO can achieve the same surgical outcomes as PPECF for the treatment of CSR. However, CKH-UBO saves more time but requires patients to undergo larger incisions.

Outcomes and Complications Associated With the Learning Curve for Endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

STUDY DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study is to examine the impact of the learning curve for endoscopic cervical foraminotomy for clinical outcomes and patient safety. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Endoscopic cervical foraminotomy is a minimally invasive surgical technique emerging in the literature for surgical management of cervical radiculopathy without the use of open incision. The adoption of endoscopic cervical foraminotomy may be hindered by the learning curve, although no review and meta-analysis exists to date on the topic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using PubMed, CINAHL, and MEDLINE from database inception until July 11, 2023. Inclusion criteria were articles that examined endoscopic cervical foraminotomy, reported outcomes, and/or complications for endoscopic cervical spine surgery relevant to the learning curve and had full-text. A random effects meta-analysis was performed for outcomes and complications. RESULTS: A total of three articles (n=203 patients) were included from 792 articles initially retrieved. The learning curves from four surgeons were examined with a FWM 21 procedures until the competency phase. There was no significant difference in the postoperative hospitalization length ( P =0.669), postoperative recovery room time ( P =0.415), intraoperative blood loss ( P =0.064), and total complication rates (10.9% vs . 1.2%, P =0.139) between endoscopic cervical foraminotomy procedures performed in the learning phase as compared with the competency phase of the learning curve. There was a significant decrease in operative time from the learning phase to the competency phase ( P =0.005). CONCLUSION: Competency was achieved on the learning curve for endoscopic cervical foraminotomy after about 21 procedures. There is no significant difference in postoperative hospitalization time, postoperative recovery room time, intraoperative blood loss, and complication rates between the learning phase and the competency phase of the learning curve for endoscopic cervical foraminotomy, noting the relatively small sample size of this study that may underpower this finding.

Comparison of the Outcomes of Microendoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy versus Full-endoscopic Cervical Foraminotomy for the Treatment of Cervical Radiculopathy.

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of microendoscopic cervical foraminotomy (MECF) versus full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy (FECF) for treating cervical radiculopathy (CR).A retrospective study was performed on patients with CR treated using MECF (n = 35) or FECF (n = 89). A 16-mm tubular retractor and endoscope was used for MECF, while a 4.1-mm working channel endoscope was used for FECF. Patient background and operative data were collected. The numerical rating scale (NRS) and the Neck Disability Index scores were recorded preoperatively and at 1 year postoperatively. Postoperative subjective satisfaction was also assessed.Although the NRS, and NDI scores, as well as postoperative satisfaction at 1 year considerably improved in both groups, one of the background data (number of operated vertebral level) was significantly different. Therefore, we separately analyzed single- and two-level CR. In single-level CR, operation time, intraoperative bleeding, postoperative stay, NDI after 1 year, and reoperation rate were statistically superior in FECF group. In two-level CR, the postoperative stay was statistically superior in FECF group. Three postoperative hematomas were observed in the MECF group, while none was observed in the FECF group.Operative outcomes did not significantly differ between groups. We did not observe postoperative hematoma in FECF even without placement of a postoperative drain. Therefore, we recommend FECF as the first option for the treatment of CR as it has a better safety profile and is minimally invasive.

Single-level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Results in Lower Five-year Revisions than Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy in a Large National Cohort.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study using the 2010-2020 MSpine PearlDiver administrative data set. OBJECTIVE: To compare perioperative adverse events and five-year revisions for single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF). SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Cervical disk disease can often be treated surgically using single-level ACDF or PCF. Prior studies have suggested that posterior approaches provide similar short-term outcomes as ACDF; however, posterior procedures may have an increased risk of revision surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The database was queried for patients undergoing elective single-level ACDF or PCF (excluding cases performed for myelopathy, trauma, neoplasm, and/or infection). Outcomes, including specific complications, readmission, and reoperations, were assessed. Multivariable logistic regression was used to ascertain odds ratios (OR) of 90-day adverse events controlling for age, sex, and comorbidities. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed to determine five-year rates of cervical reoperation in the ACDF and PCF cohorts. RESULTS: A total of 31,953 patients treated by ACDF (29,958, 93.76%) or PCF (1995, 6.24%) were identified. Multivariable analysis, controlling for age, sex, and comorbidities, demonstrated that PCF was associated with significantly greater odds of aggregated serious adverse events (OR 2.17, P <0.001), wound dehiscence (OR 5.89, P <0.001), surgical site infection (OR 3.66, P <0.001), and pulmonary embolism (OR 1.72, P =0.04). However, PCF was associated with significantly lower odds of readmission (OR 0.32, P <0.001), dysphagia (OR 0.44, P <0.001), and pneumonia (OR 0.50, P =0.004). At five years, PCF cases had a significantly higher cumulative revision rate compared with ACDF cases (19.0% vs. 14.8%, P <0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The current study is the largest to date to compare short-term adverse events and five-year revision rates between single-level ACDF and PCF for nonmyelopathy elective cases. Perioperative adverse events differed by procedure, and it was notable that the incidence of cumulative revisions was higher for PCF. These findings can be used in decision-making when there is clinical equipoise between ACDF and PCF.

Morphometric change in intervertebral foramen after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy: an in vivo radiographic study based on three-dimensional foramen reconstruction.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to perform in vivo three-dimensional (3D) quantitative measurements of morphometric changes in the foramen in patients with lumbar foraminal stenosis (LFS) undergoing percutaneous endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy (PELF) and investigate the relationship between anatomical changes in the foramen and clinical outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed consecutive patients with LFS treated with PELF between January 2016 and September 2020 at our centre. Clinical outcomes were evaluated. Foraminal volume (FV) and foraminal minimal area (FMA) were calculated using a novel vertebral and foramen segmentation method. A comparison of the anatomical parameters of the foramen were conducted between the satisfied and unsatisfied groups divided based on the modified MacNab criteria. RESULTS: A total of 26 eligible patients with a mean follow-up of 3.6 years were enrolled. A significant increase was found in overall FV (71.5%) from 1.436 ± 0.396 to 2.464 ± 0.719 cm3 (P < 0.001) and FMA (109.5%) from 0.849 ± 0.207 to 1.780 ± 0.524 cm2. All clinical outcomes were significantly improved (P < 0.001) after PELF. No significant difference was found in changes in neither FV nor FMA between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Clinical results and foraminal dimensions improved significantly after PELF, indicating that PELF was a prominent technique suitable for LFS because of the direct decompression at impingement structures. No relationship was found between morphometric changes and clinical outcomes, revealing that full-scale endoscopic decompression is necessary and adequate for LFS, and unsatisfactory outcomes are less likely to result from decompression procedure.

Predictable factors for aggravation of cervical alignment after posterior cervical foraminotomy.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the risk factors for aggravation of cervical alignment after posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) and to identify their relationships with kyphotic changes in cervical curvature. METHODS: Ninety-eight patients who underwent PCF for unilateral radiculopathy and received follow-up for more than 2 years were retrospectively reviewed. Segmental Cobb angle (SA), cervical Cobb angle (CA), Pfirrmann grade, foraminal stenosis, and clinical outcomes including neck pain, arm pain, and Neck Disability Index scores were assessed. Radiological and clinical outcomes were compared between groups C (control group with kyphotic change in CA < 5°) and K (kyphotic group with kyphotic change in CA ≥ 5°). Multivariate regression analysis was performed to determine the risk factors for kyphotic change ≥ 5° after PCF. RESULTS: Group K was significantly older than group C (p = 0.002) and had a higher Pfirrmann grade (p = 0.025). In group K, neck pain had significantly increased at last follow-up (p < 0.001). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed that kyphotic changes in CA were related to older age (p = 0.016, B = 0.420) and Pfirrmann grade of the operative levels (p = 0.032, B = 4.560). Preoperative hypolordosis was not an independent risk factor for kyphotic changes in CA. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that the cutoff value for kyphotic changes in patients with CA ≥ 5° was Pfirrmann grade 3.417 (p = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to previous studies, preoperative hypolordosis was not a risk factor for kyphotic changes in CA after PCF. Older patients with disc degeneration of Pfirrmann grade IV or greater for should be carefully considered.

Noninferiority of Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy vs Anterior Cervical Discectomy With Fusion for Procedural Success and Reduction in Arm Pain Among Patients With Cervical Radiculopathy at 1 Year: The FACET Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: The choice between posterior cervical foraminotomy (posterior surgery) and anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (anterior surgery) for cervical foraminal radiculopathy remains controversial. Objective: To investigate the noninferiority of posterior vs anterior surgery in patients with cervical foraminal radiculopathy with regard to clinical outcomes after 1 year. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter investigator-blinded noninferiority randomized clinical trial was conducted from January 2016 to May 2020 with a total follow-up of 2 years. Patients were included from 9 hospitals in the Netherlands. Of 389 adult patients with 1-sided single-level cervical foraminal radiculopathy screened for eligibility, 124 declined to participate or did not meet eligibility criteria. Patients with pure axial neck pain without radicular pain were not eligible. Of 265 patients randomized (132 to posterior and 133 to anterior), 15 were lost to follow-up and 228 were included in the 1-year analysis (110 in posterior and 118 in anterior). Interventions: Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to posterior foraminotomy or anterior cervical discectomy with fusion. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary outcomes were proportion of success using Odom criteria and decrease in arm pain using a visual analogue scale from 0 to 100 with a noninferiority margin of 10% (assuming advantages with posterior surgery over anterior surgery that would justify a tolerable loss of efficacy of 10%). Secondary outcomes were neck pain, disability, quality of life, work status, treatment satisfaction, reoperations, and complications. Analyses were performed with 2-proportion z tests at 1-sided .05 significance levels with Bonferroni corrections. Results: Among 265 included patients, the mean (SD) age was 51.2 (8.3) years; 133 patients (50%) were female and 132 (50%) were male. Patients were randomly assigned to posterior (132) or anterior (133) surgery. The proportion of success was 0.88 (86 of 98) in the posterior surgery group and 0.76 (81 of 106) in the anterior surgery group (difference, -0.11 percentage points; 1-sided 95% CI, -0.01) and the between-group difference in arm pain was -2.8 (1-sided 95% CI, -9.4) at 1-year follow-up, indicating noninferiority of posterior surgery. Decrease in arm pain had a between-group difference of 3.4 (1-sided 95% CI, 11.8), crossing the noninferiority margin with 1.8 points. All secondary outcomes had 2-sided 95% CIs clustered around 0 with small between-group differences. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, posterior surgery was noninferior to anterior surgery for patients with cervical radiculopathy regarding success rate and arm pain at 1 year. Decrease in arm pain and secondary outcomes had small between-group differences. These results may be used to enhance shared decision-making. Trial Registration: Netherlands Trial Register Identifier: NTR5536.

Percutaneous Full-Endoscopic versus Biportal Endoscopic Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Unilateral Cervical Foraminal Disc Disease.

Background: The biportal endoscopic technique (BE) is a fast-growing surgical modality that can be applied to posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF), as well as lumbar discectomy and decompressive laminectomy. It has several technical differences from the percutaneous full-endoscopic technique (PE), which has been standardized as the representative endoscopic spinal surgery technique. The purpose of this study was to compare the short-term clinical outcomes between BE-PCF and PE-PCF. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted on 66 patients who had single-level unilateral cervical foraminal disc disease (UCFD). All patients underwent PE- or BE-PCF. Clinical outcomes including visual analog scale (VAS)-arm, VAS-neck, and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were evaluated. Perioperative data including operation time, length of hospital stay (LOS), amount of surgical drain, postoperative complications, and reoperation were collected. Serum creatine phosphokinase (CPK) and C-reactive protein (CRP) levels were recorded. Results: A total of 65 patients were included in the final analysis: 32 with PE-PCF and 33 with BE-PCF. There was no statistically significant difference in demographic and preoperative data between the two groups. All patients had significant improvement in VAS-arm, VAS-neck, and NDI compared to the baseline value. The improvement of all parameters was comparable between the two groups at each point for 1 year after surgery (p > 0.05), except for the significantly lower VAS-neck at postoperative 2 days in PE-PCF (p = 0.005). The total operation time was significantly shorter in BE-PCF (p = 0.036). There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in regard to LOS, amount of surgical drain, and serum CPK and CRP levels (p > 0.05). Reoperation and complications between the two groups were comparable (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The 1-year postoperative clinical outcomes of PE-PCF and BE-PCF for cervical pain and disability caused by UCFD were good and comparable. PE-PCF resulted in significantly less immediate postoperative neck pain, but BE-PCF required shorter total operation time.

Minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for cervical radiculopathy: a meta-analysis.

With the recent development of minimally invasive techniques, minimally invasive posterior cervical foraminotomy (MIS-PCF) has become increasingly popular as a minimally invasive method to treat cervical radiculopathy. However, there are still controversies about whether MIS-PCF is superior to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the therapeutic effects of MIS-PCF and ACDF on unilateral cervical radiculopathy without myelopathy. We searched PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Scopus comprehensively using the terms related to MIS-PCF. Two reviewers independently evaluated the potential studies, and extracted and analyzed the data of operation time, hospital stay, neck disability index (NDI) score, visual analog scale for neck pain (VAS-neck) and arm pain (VAS-arm) scores, reoperation rate, and complications. Seven studies with 1175 patients were included. The study population was 53.5% male, with a mean age of 48.9. MIS-PCF presented a significantly shorter postoperative hospitalization time compared to ACDF, while the operation time, complication/reoperation rate, and VAS-arm, VAS-neck, and NDI scores were comparable between the two cohorts. In North America, the average cost of MIS-PCF is lower than ACDF. Thus, we suggest that MIS-PCF is an alternative to ACDF for selected patients.

Ambulatory Single-level Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Cervical Radiculopathy: A Propensity-matched Analysis of Complication Rates.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort comparison study. OBJECTIVE: The aim was to compare perioperative complications and 30-day readmission between ambulatory and inpatient posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Single-level PCF for cervical radiculopathy is increasingly being performed as an ambulatory procedure. Despite this increase, there is a lack of published literature documenting the safety of ambulatory PCF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent PCF (through laminotomy or laminectomy) were identified in the 2005-2018 NSQIP database. Ambulatory procedures were defined as cases that had hospital length of stay=0 days. Inpatient procedures were defined as cases that had length of stay=1-4 days. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and procedural variables (laminotomy or laminectomy performed) were compared between the 2 cohorts. Propensity score matched comparisons were then performed for postoperative complications and 30-day readmissions between the 2 groups. RESULTS: In total, 795 ambulatory and 1789 inpatient single-level PCF cases were identified. After matching, there were 795 ambulatory and 795 inpatient cases. Statistical analysis after propensity score matching revealed no significant difference in individual complications including 30-day readmission, thromboembolic events, wound complications, and reoperation, or aggregated complications between ambulatory versus matched inpatient procedures. Overall 30-day readmissions after ambulatory single-level PCF were noted for 2.46% of the study population, and the most common reasons were surgical site infections (46%) and pain control (15%). CONCLUSIONS: The perioperative outcomes assessed in this study support the conclusion that single-level PCF for cervical radiculopathy can be performed for correctly selected patients in the ambulatory setting without increased rates of 30-day perioperative complications or readmissions compared with inpatient procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Critical points and effectiveness of prophylactic C4/5 foraminotomy to prevent C5 palsy after posterior cervical spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to clarify the cut-off values of the spinal canal parameters as risk factors for C5 palsy after posterior cervical spine surgery with and without foraminotomy. METHODS: One hundred three consecutive patients (67 males, 36 females; mean age = 66 years, age range = 27-87 years) with cervical myelopathy who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery at our institution were retrospectively reviewed and included in the study. The first consecutive 69 patients who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery with prophylactic bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy were designated as the F (+) group. The subsequent 34 consecutive patients who underwent posterior cervical spine surgery without prophylactic bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy were designated as the F (-) group. All patients were then divided into four subgroups. In the F (+) group, patients with C5 palsy were designated as the F (+) P (+) subgroup (n = 13), while those without C5 palsy were designated as the F (+) P (-) subgroup (n = 56). In the F (-) group, patients with C5 palsy were designated as the F (-) P (+) subgroup (n = 5), while those without C5 palsy were designated as the F (-)P(-) subgroup (n = 29). Receiver operating characteristic curves were used to investigate the cut-off values of the spinal canal parameters for the development of postoperative C5 palsy. The assessed spinal parameters were the gutter positions (GP), laminar inclination angles (LIA), and postoperative cross-sectional areas (CSA) of the dural sac. The risk ratios (RR) of the spinal canal parameters as risk factors for C5 palsy were evaluated. RESULTS: The incidence of C5 palsy was similar between the F (+) group (18.8%) and the F (-) group (14.7%). The cut-off values for each spinal canal parameter in the F (+) group (GP: 0.82-0.84, LIA: 58.9-62.4°, and CSA: 189.5-200 mm2 ) were similar to those in the F (-) group (0.81-0.89, 61.7-62.5°, and 197.5-199.5 mm2, respectively). In the RR results for C5 palsy, the LIA was highest in both groups. The F (+) P (-) subgroup had significantly larger mean CSA at C4/5 and C5/6 (202.3 mm2 and 200.9 mm2, respectively) than the F (-)P(-) subgroup (177.3 mm2 and 178.9 mm2, respectively) (P = 0.0181 and P = 0.0277, respectively). Prophylactic C4/5 foraminotomy did not specifically prevent postoperative C5 palsy due to foraminal stenosis at C4/5. CONCLUSION: C4/5 foraminotomy should not be recommended for avoidance of C5 palsy. Although the bony spinal parameters were similar between the F (+) and F (-) groups, the CSA in the F (+) group was significantly than that in the F (-) group in the patients without C5 palsy.

Operative treatment of cervical radiculopathy: anterior cervical decompression and fusion compared with posterior foraminotomy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Cervical radiculopathy is the most common disease in the cervical spine, affecting patients around 50-55 year of age. An operative treatment is common clinical praxis when non-operative treatment fails. The controversy is in the choice of operative treatment, conducting either anterior cervical decompression and fusion or posterior foraminotomy. The study objective is to evaluate short- and long-term outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) and posterior foraminotomy (PF) METHODS: A multicenter prospective randomized controlled trial with 1:1 randomization, ACDF vs. PF including 110 patients. The primary aim is to evaluate if PF is non-inferior to ACDF using a non-inferiority design with ACDF as "active control." The neck disability index (NDI) is the primary outcome measure, and duration of follow-up is 2 years. DISCUSSION: Due to absence of high level of evidence, the authors believe that a RCT will improve the evidence for using the different surgical treatments for cervical radiculopathy and strengthen current surgical treatment recommendation. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04177849. Registered on November 26, 2019.

Effect of Dorsal Root Ganglion Retraction in Endoscopic Lumbar Decompressive Surgery for Foraminal Pathology: A Retrospective Cohort Study of Interlaminar Contralateral Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy and Discectomy versus Transforaminal Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminotomy and Discectomy.

OBJECTIVE: Postoperative dysesthesia (POD) is a common complication in surgery involving foraminal diseases, including lumbar foraminal or extraforaminal herniated nucleus pulposus (HNP). Minimal dorsal root ganglion (DRG) retraction is key to preventing POD. We compared the clinical results, safety, and efficacy between the paraspinal transforaminal approach requiring DRG retraction and the interlaminar contralateral approach without DRG retraction for foraminal and extraforaminal diseases. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of 50 patients who underwent uniportal transforaminal endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy and discectomy (TELD) and 50 patients who underwent anuniportal interlaminar contralateral endoscopic lumbar foraminotomy and discectomy (ICELF) because of lumbar foraminal HNP. The operated levels, combined degenerative diseases, postoperative complications, and POD were analyzed. The visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores, modified Oswestry Disability Index, and MacNab criteria for evaluating pain disability and response were analyzed. RESULTS: In the ICELF group (total, n = 7, 14%), there were 5 (10%) and 2 (4%) patients with POD grade 1 and 2, respectively. In the TELD group (total, n = 13, 26%), there were 7 (14%), 5 (10%), and 1 (2%) patients with POD grade 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The overall occurrence rate of grade 2 and greater POD was higher in the TELD group (n = 6, 12%) than in the ICELF group (n = 2, 4%). In the ICELF group, 3 of 9 patients (33%) with combined canal structure deforming diseases had POD, of whom none had POD of grade 2 and greater. In the TELD group, 4 of 7 patients (57%) with combined canal structure deforming diseases had POD, of whom all had POD of grade 2 and greater. Two surgical groups showed favorable clinical outcomes with the visual analog scale, Oswestry Disability Index, and MacNab criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Both TELD and ICELF were found to treat foraminal or extraforaminal HNP with good clinical outcomes. ICELF might have a lower POD rate in complicated cases such as adjacent segment disease, degenerative spondylolisthesis, and isthmic spondylolisthesis. This surgical procedure could be an alternative in complicated cases or in patients with an anatomically limited L5-S1 level. However, the procedure is technically challenging to perform.

Can prophylactic C4/5 foraminotomy prevent C5 palsy after cervical laminoplasty with and without posterior instrumented fusion with maximal expansion?

OBJECTIVE: To prospectively examine whether laminoplasty with maximal expansion induces C5 palsy, even with prophylactic bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy. METHODS: Thirty-five consecutive patients with cervical myelopathy underwent laminoplasty (n = 19: LP group) or posterior decompression and fusion (n = 16: PDF group) with maximal expansion. Prophylactic bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy was performed alternately in consecutive five patients undergoing each type of surgery. In each type of surgery, the first and third consecutive five patients did not undergo foraminotomy (NF subgroup: 20 patients), while the second and fourth consecutive five patients underwent foraminotomy (F subgroup: 15 patients). The widths between the gutters was equivalent to the diameter of the spinal canal, and an inclination angle of the lamina of approximately 90° was created during laminoplasty. The incidence and severity of postoperative C5 palsy were investigated. Patients with a manual muscle testing score for the deltoid muscle and/or biceps brachii muscle of ≤ 2 were diagnosed with severe palsy. RESULTS: The respective incidences of C5 palsy in the F and NF subgroups were 33% and 20% in the LP group and 50% and 20% in the PDF group. Severe palsy occurred in 67% and 0% of patients who had developed palsy in F and NF subgroups, respectively, in the LP group, and in 100% of patients in the PDF group. Furthermore, 40% of the patients with severe palsy took more than 6 months to recover. CONCLUSIONS: Laminoplasty with maximal expansion induced C5 palsy in both the LP and PDF groups, even with the addition of prophylactic bilateral C4/5 foraminotomy.

Direct Involvement of Concomitant Foraminotomy for Radiculomyelopathy in Postoperative Upper Limb Palsy in Cervical Laminoplasty.

OBJECTIVE: Although concomitant foraminotomy has been reported to increase the risk of postoperative upper limb palsy (ULP) in cervical laminoplasty, the specific effects of concomitant foraminotomy on ULP remain uncertain. This study aimed to clarify the effect of concomitant foraminotomy on ULP in cervical laminoplasty. METHODS: We identified 19 patients who developed ULP after laminoplasty with concomitant foraminotomy for radiculomyelopathy with nerve root impingement (laminoplasty with concomitant foraminotomy group [F-group]) from 4080 patients who underwent primary cervical laminoplasty at 27 affiliated institutions between 2012 and 2018. An age- and sex-matched control group comprised patients who developed ULP after laminoplasty without concomitant foraminotomy (n = 76, 4:1 ratio with F-group). Collected data included the time of onset and distribution of ULP (side and level). The site of foraminotomy was recorded in the F-group. RESULTS: The F-group showed a significantly higher incidence of ULP than the candidates for the control group (15.1% vs. 3.1%, P < 0.001). The site of foraminotomy was consistent with the distribution of ULP in 79% (15 of 19 patients) of the F-group. The F-group showed a significantly higher proportion of preoperative upper-limb muscle weakness (74% vs. 37%, P = 0.005) and early-onset ULP occurring by postoperative day 1 (63% vs. 33%, P = 0.02) compared with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the foraminotomy procedure in the stenotic foramen is directly involved in ULP. Combined with a previous report suggesting that early-onset ULP is associated with thermal nerve damage, our results indicate that thermal nerve damage partly explains the increased incidence of ULP in the F-group.

Posterior endoscopic cervical foramiotomy and discectomy: clinical and radiological computer tomography evaluation on the bony effect of decompression with 2 years follow-up.

PURPOSE: Cervical radiculopathy is a common disabling cervical spine condition. Open anterior and posterior approaches are the conventional surgical treatment approaches with good clinical outcomes. However, the soft tissue damage in these procedures can lead to increase perioperative morbidity. Endoscopic spine surgery provides more soft tissue preservation than conventional approaches. We investigate the radiological and clinical outcomes of posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy. METHODS: A prospective clinical and radiological study with retrospective evaluation were done for 25 patients with 29 levels of cervical radiculopathy who underwent posterior endoscopic cervical discectomy from November 2016 to December 2018. Clinical outcomes of Visual Analogue Scale, Neck Disability Index and MacNab's score were evaluated at pre-operative, post-operative 1 week, 3 months and final follow-up. Preoperative and post-operative final follow-up flexion and extension roentgenogram were evaluated for cervical stability assessment. Pre-operative and post-operative computer tomography cervical spine evaluation of foraminal length in ventro-dorsal, cephalad-caudal dimensions, sagittal foraminal area and using 3D CT reconstruction coronal decompression area were done. RESULTS: Twenty-nine levels of cervical radiculopathy underwent posterior endoscopic cervical decompression. The mean follow-up was 29.6 months, and the most common levels affected were C5/6 and C6/7. There was a complication rate of 12% with 2 cases of neurapraxia and one case of recurrent of prolapsed disc. There was no revision surgery in our series. There was significant clinical improvement in Visual Analogue Scale and Neck Disability Index. Prospective comparative study between preoperative and final follow-up mean improvement in VAS score was 5.08 ± 1.75, and NDI was 45.1 ± 13.3. Ninety-two percent of the patients achieved good and excellent results as per MacNab's criteria. Retrospective evaluation of the radiological data showed significant increments of foraminal dimensions: (1) sagittal area increased 21.4 ± 11.2 mm2, (2) CT Cranio Caudal length increased 1.21 ± 1.30 mm and (3) CT ventro-dorsal length increased 2.09 ± 1.35 mm and (4) 3D CT scan reconstruction coronal decompression area increased 536 ± 176 mm2, p < 0.05. CONCLUSION: Uniportal posterior endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy are safe, efficient and precise choreographed set of technique in the treatment of cervical radiculopathy. It significantly improved clinical outcomes and achieved the objective of increasing in the cervical foramen size in our cohort of patients.

Long-term Radiological Evidence of Affected and Adjacent Segment Disease after Anterior Cervical Foraminotomy.

Anterior cervical foraminotomy (ACF) is a surgical procedure for cervical radiculopathy to avoid fusion and adjacent segment disease (ASD), but its long-term outcome has yet to be investigated. It is also unclear whether ACF enables preservation of range of motion (ROM) and decreases ASD compared with anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). This study included nine patients who underwent ACF, and 12 who underwent ACDF and with follow-up period of at least 5 years (average follow-up: 8.7 years). Preoperative and postoperative radiological findings were investigated, comparing the changes in ACF versus ACDF. All disc height (DH) levels (C2/3-C7/Th1) were measured preoperatively and postoperatively in all 21 patients to compare with the change due to the natural history. The ACF group experienced significant loss of DH (0.6 mm, 13.5%, p <0.01) and ROM (p <0.01) at the operated level postoperatively. However, loss of DH was not significantly different from natural changes at unaffected levels, and ROM was maintained. The ACDF group experienced a significant increase in the ROM of the cranial adjacent segment from 6.46 mm to 7.45 mm (p <0.01), and the dislocation in dynamic X-ray was also significantly increased from 1.61 mm to 2.89 mm (p <0.01), indicating radiological ASD. The ACF group had no significant increase in ROM and dislocation. ACF causes significant loss of DH and ROM, but this change is not significantly different compared with natural changes at unaffected levels. Furthermore, ACF causes less ASD than ACDF in the long term.

Efficacy and Safety of Foraminoplasty Performed Using an Endoscopic Drill to Treat Axillary Disc Herniation.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of foraminoplasty using percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) (performed with the aid of an endoscopic drill) to treat patients with axillary disc herniations. METHODS: From October 2016 to October 2018, 83 patients with single segmental axillary disc herniations diagnosed via magnetic resonance imaging who had undergone PTED were retrospectively evaluated. Of these, 38 and 45 underwent foraminoplasty using a trephine and an endoscopic drill, respectively. The 2 groups did not differ significantly in terms of age, sex, the herniated segment, the preoperative visual analog score (VAS), or the Oswestry disability index (ODI) (all P > 0.05). Foraminoplasty-related index scores were recorded. RESULTS: We found no significant between-group difference in the VAS and ODI scores at any time after surgery; in contrast, the scores improved significantly compared with those before surgery (both P < 0.05). Compared with the trephine group, the fluoroscopy time was shorter in the endoscopic drill group but the foraminoplasty and total operation times were longer. CONCLUSIONS: Foraminoplasty featuring endoscopic drilling can be used to treat axillary-type lumbar disc herniations. The radiation exposure time is less than that of the trephine approach, but the drilling approach is less efficient. The short-term clinical outcomes afforded by the 2 methods do not differ.

Cervical posterior foraminotomy: how i do it.

BACKGROUND: Cervical pathologies are addressed through a variety of anterior and posterior approaches and minimally invasive procedures have been successfully applied during the last decades. Posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) should be proposed with isolated foraminal stenosis. METHOD: We provide a step-by-step description of PCF through the use of tubular retractors. Its advantages and limitations were detailed. CONCLUSION: PCF performed with tubular retractors represent a safe and efficient alternative to address an isolated level disease with unilateral radiculopathy. The risk of mechanical instability is limited when only the medial third of the facet is drilled. Patients present rapid functional recovery.