Therapeutic apheresis in renal transplantation: An update.

Therapeutic apheresis (TA) plays a significant role in various aspects of renal transplantation. It has been a necessary preconditioning component in ABO incompatible kidney transplants and an important modality in the removal of anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies both in the context of desensitization protocols that have been developed to allow highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates to be successfully transplanted and as treatment of antibody mediated rejection episodes post transplantation. In addition, TA has been used with various results for the management of recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis. The purpose of this review is to examine the evidence supporting the application of TA as an adjunctive therapeutic option to immunosuppressive agents in protocols both before and after kidney transplantation.

Unraveling complexity of antibody-mediated rejections, the mandatory way towards an accurate diagnosis and a personalized treatment.

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) remains one of the most challenging issues after organ transplantation and particularly after kidney transplantation. Despite many progresses during the last decade, ABMR is still the main cause of kidney graft loss and this all over the post- transplant period. In this review, we describe the recent knowledge about molecular and cellular mechanisms involved in ABMR. We focused our report on the role of the complement pathway in the process of ABMR and we give some insights into the role of inflammatory cells, NK lymphocytes and the role of endothelial cells. We further describe the potential role of non-HLA antibodies, of which the importance has been increasingly emphasized in recent years. Overall, this report could be of interest for all physicians who are working in the field of organ transplantation or who are working in the field of immunology. It gives essential information to understand new diagnosis advances and further therapeutic approaches. Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is the leading cause of graft failure ([1,2]). In contrast to T-cell mediated rejection usually sensitive to steroids, active ABMR remains a therapeutic challenge. ABMR diagnosis relies on the presence of renal injuries and donor-specific antibodies (DSA) (HLA and non HLA antibodies) with sometimes the evidence of interaction between DSA and graft endothelium. Regularly revised during expert conferences, ABMR definition is currently categorized as active or chronic active. [3] The emergence of validated molecular assays targeting a better phenotyping of ABMR and the recent advances regarding the detrimental effect of DSA directed against minor antigens open the way to a better assessment of the heterogeneity of ABMR. In this review, we will address new aspects of ABMR regarding its mechanisms, diagnosis and treatments.

A case of successful desensitization using therapeutic plasma exchange in high-risk HLA incompatible kidney transplantation.

Advances in immune suppression therapies and desensitization have made possible kidney transplantation regardless of HLA incompatibility. Single antigen bead assay (SAB) is a semi-quantitative estimation of the amount of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies present in the recipient plasma, and mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) generated gives this rough estimation of the antibodies present in the recipient. Here we present a case of successful kidney transplantation in a patient who expressed DSA with high MFI. A 33-yr-old male, diagnosed with chronic kidney disease (CKD) on regular maintenance hemodialysis, opted for second kidney transplant with his sibling as prospective donor and was referred to the department of Transplant Immunology for histocompatibility testing. Patient had HLA incompatibility with multiple DSA identified by SAB. Patient undergone 20 sessions of plasma exchange till discharge and finally till 6 months graft was functioning well. The authors thus conclude that the option of a high-risk HLA incompatible kidney transplant can be offered to recipients with high MFI DSA, who wish to undergo transplantation for end stage renal disease.

Prognosis and Treatment for Active and Chronic Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Renal Transplant Recipients; Single Center Experience.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to evaluate the prognostic factors and treatment alternatives of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) in renal transplant patients. METHODS: Three thousand renal transplant patients were included in the study. The patients were first divided into 2 groups. Group 1: ABMR [-] recipients (n = 2871), Group 2: ABMR (+) recipients (n = 129). ABMR patients were compared among themselves by dividing them into 3 subgroups (early-active, late-active, chronic-active). The study was performed retrospectively. Different combinations of methylprednisolone, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG), rituximab, plasmapheresis (PP), anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) were used in the treatment and the results were compared. RESULTS: Graft survival and functions were worse and the rates of CAD, delayed graft function, BK virus, and cytomegalovirus higher in patients with ABMR. Also, graft survival was lower in patients with serum creatinine ≥3 (P = 0.001), GFR <30 (P <0.001), and spot urine protein to creatinine ratio ≥1 (P = 0.042) at the time of diagnosis. High interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy scores in chronic ABMR cases and high intimal arteritis scores in active ABMR cases were poor prognostic factors. CONCLUSIONS: The study showed that ABMR has a poor prognosis in terms of clinical parameters, and treatment should be individualized according to pathologic findings and graft functions at the time of diagnosis. Pulse methylprednisolone and IVIG should be used in the treatment of all ABMR patients, but PP, rituximab, and ATG should be used in selected cases. ABMR has a poor prognosis and treatment should be individualized.

[Diagnosis and management of renal allograft rejection]. / Diagnostic et prise en charge thérapeutique du rejet en transplantation rénale.

Renal allograft rejection involves many mechanisms of innate and adaptive immunity, responsible for parenchymal inflammatory lesions that negatively impact the long-term outcomes of the renal allograft. The heterogeneous presentations of rejections in terms of clinical, biological and histological aspects make them difficult to manage in daily clinical practice. Indeed, current therapeutic strategies are disappointing in term of long-term outcomes, including graft survival. In this article, we will discuss the main effector mechanisms of rejection and their histological classification, as well as the existing treatments and those currently under evaluation.

: Le rejet du greffon rénal fait intervenir de nombreux mécanismes de l'immunité innée et adaptative, responsables de lésions inflammatoires parenchymateuses impactant négativement le devenir au long cours du greffon rénal. La grande hétérogénéité dans la présentation clinique, biologique et histologique des rejets de greffe en fait des entités difficiles à prendre en charge en pratique clinique quotidienne. En effet, les stratégies thérapeutiques actuelles montrent des résultats assez décevants pour le traitement des rejets, ce qui a comme conséquence une diminution significative de la survie des greffons. Nous aborderons dans cet article les principaux mécanismes effecteurs des rejets, leur classification histologique ainsi que les traitements existants et en cours de validation.

Antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation in children; therapy challenges and future potential treatments.

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) remains one of the most critical problems in renal transplantation, with a significant impact on patient and graft survival. In the United States, no treatment has received FDA approval jet. Studies about treatments of AMR remain controversial, limited by the absence of a gold standard and the difficulty in creating large, multi-center studies. These limitations emerge even more in pediatric transplantation because of the limited number of pediatric studies and the occasional use of some therapies with unknown and poorly documented side effects. The lack of recommendations and the unsharp definition of different forms of AMR contribute to the challenging management of the therapy by pediatric nephrologists. In an attempt to help clinicians involved in the care of renal transplanted children affected by an AMR, we rely on the latest recommendations of the Transplantation Society (TTS) for the classification and treatment of AMR to describe treatments available today and potential new treatments with a particular focus on the pediatric population.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Adult Liver Transplant Recipients: A Case Series and Literature Review.

Antibody-mediated rejection is a rare complication following liver transplantation, and there is a lack of a comprehensive treatment strategy to provide detailed information about the dose and duration of antibody-mediated rejection treatment. This study describes 8 adult liver transplantation recipients who developed antibody-mediated rejection between 2002 and 2021 in our center, as well as a review of the literature on the reported cases of antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation recipients. Our center's medical records were reviewed retrospectively to extract the necessary data on patients' characteristics, management, and outcomes. Then, a comprehensive search using Embase, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases was conducted without time limitation until June 2021. Finally, a stepwise protocol was developed for managing acute, chronic, and recurrent antibody-mediated rejection in patients undergoing liver transplantation, based on our own experience, reported cases in the literature, and data from kidney transplantation. By review of the literature, 24 case studies containing 64 patients were identified, and their management strategies and outcomes were evaluated. Although various combinations of corticosteroids, plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulin, and biological agents are used in the treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in liver transplantation, treatment strategies should be classified according to the type, severity, and the timing of its onset. Given the importance of early treatment, rituximab and/or bortezomib should be started as soon as possible if no improvement in liver enzymes/bilirubin is observed during the initial treatment strategy using corticosteroids, plasma exchange, and intravenous immunoglobulin.

Immunogenic and immunotolerogenic effects of extracorporeal photopheresis in high immunological risk kidney recipients. A single center case series.

The immunomodulatory effects of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) have been used for the treatment of T-cell mediated disorders, such as rejection in organ transplantation. Currently, it is an established therapy for heart and lung rejection, but not for kidney transplantation (KT), where experience is limited. In addition, some data suggest that ECP could generate an immune response against infections, thus being an alternative for the treatment of rejection in case of active or high-risk of infection. In the present study, we analyze four cases of use of ECP as concomitant therapy in patients with KT and high risk of opportunistic infections due to the high burden of immunosuppression throughout their renal diseases. Two patients had concomitant viral infection (cytomegalovirus and BK virus, respectively) and three patients were on treatment for graft rejection. In the two patients with active viral infection, the infection was successfully controlled during ECP treatment. In all cases, ECP has been shown to be a safe procedure, without complications.

Blocking hyaluronan synthesis alleviates acute lung allograft rejection.

Lung allograft rejection results in the accumulation of low-molecular weight hyaluronic acid (LMW-HA), which further propagates inflammation and tissue injury. We have previously shown that therapeutic lymphangiogenesis in a murine model of lung allograft rejection reduced tissue LMW-HA and was associated with improved transplant outcomes. Herein, we investigated the use of 4-Methylumbelliferone (4MU), a known inhibitor of HA synthesis, to alleviate acute allograft rejection in a murine model of lung transplantation. We found that treating mice with 4MU from days 20 to 30 after transplant was sufficient to significantly improve outcomes, characterized by a reduction in T cell-mediated lung inflammation and LMW-HA content and in improved pathology scores. In vitro, 4MU directly attenuated activation, proliferation, and differentiation of naive CD4+ T cells into Th1 cells. As 4MU has already been demonstrated to be safe for human use, we believe examining 4MU for the treatment of acute lung allograft rejection may be of clinical significance.

ISHLT consensus document on lung transplantation in patients with connective tissue disease: Part III: Pharmacology, medical and surgical management of post-transplant extrapulmonary conditions statements.

Patients with connective tissues disease (CTD) are often on immunomodulatory agents before lung transplantation (LTx). Till now, there's no consensus on the safety of using these agents perioperative and post-transplant. The International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation-supported consensus document on LTx in patients with CTD addresses the risk and contraindications of perioperative and post-transplant management of the biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARD), kinase inhibitor DMARD, and biologic agents used for LTx candidates with underlying CTD, and the recommendations and management of non-gastrointestinal extrapulmonary manifestations, and esophageal disorders by medical and surgical approaches for CTD transplant recipients.

Overexpression of miR-223 Promotes Tolerogenic Properties of Dendritic Cells Involved in Heart Transplantation Tolerance by Targeting Irak1.

Dendritic cells (DCs) are key mediators of transplant rejection. Numerous factors have been identified that regulate transplant immunopathology by modulating the function of DCs. Among these, microRNAs (miRNAs), small non-coding RNA molecules, have received much attention. The miRNA miR-223 is very highly expressed and tightly regulated in hematopoietic cells. It plays an important role in modulating the immune response by regulating neutrophils and macrophages, and its dysregulation contributes to multiple types of immune diseases. However, the role of miR-223 in immune rejection is unclear. Here, we observed expression of miR-223 in patients and mice who had undergone heart transplantation and found that it increased in the serum of both, and also in DCs from the spleens of recipient mice, although it was unchanged in splenic T cells. We also found that miR-223 expression decreased in lipopolysaccharide-stimulated DCs. Increasing the level of miR-223 in DCs promoted polarization of DCs toward a tolerogenic phenotype, which indicates that miR-223 can attenuate activation and maturation of DCs. MiR-223 effectively induced regulatory T cells (Tregs) by inhibiting the function of antigen-presenting DCs. In addition, we identified Irak1 as a miR-223 target gene and an essential regulator of DC maturation. In mouse allogeneic heterotopic heart transplantation models, grafts survived longer and suffered less immune cell infiltration in mice with miR-223-overexpressing immature (im)DCs. In the miR-223-overexpressing imDC recipients, T cells from spleen differentiated into Tregs, and the level of IL-10 in heart grafts was markedly higher than that in the control group. In conclusion, miR-223 regulates the function of DCs via Irak1, differentiation of T cells into Tregs, and secretion of IL-10, thereby suppressing allogeneic heart graft rejection.

Successful treatment of acute kidney allograft rejection using extracorporeal photopheresis in the context of post-transplant lymphoproliferative diseases: three successive cases.

We reported 3 kidney transplant patients with PTLD who developed mixed AR following IS treatment minimization. AR episodes were treated with extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP), methylprednisolone and IVIG. In all patients, graft function improved under ECP and stabilized in the long term. These observations suggest that ECP is safe and efficient for treatment of AR in the context of PTLD.

Impact of Sex in the Efficacy of Perioperative Desensitization Procedures in Heart Transplantation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background: Sensitized patients, i.e. recipients with preformed donor-specific HLA antibodies (pfDSA), are at high-risk of developing antibody-mediated rejections (AMR) and dying after heart transplantation (HTx). Perioperative desensitization procedures are associated with better outcomes but can cause sensitization, which may influence their efficacy. Methods: In sensitized patients (pfDSA>1000 mean immunofluorescence (MFI) units), we assessed the effect of perioperative desensitization by comparing treated patients to a historical control cohort. Multivariable survival analyses were performed on the time to main outcome, a composite of death and biopsy-proven AMR with 5-year follow-up. Results: The study included 68 patients: 31 control and 37 treated patients. There was no difference in preoperative variables between the two groups, including cumulative pfDSA [4026 (1788;8725) vs 4560 (3162;13392) MFI units, p=0.28]. The cause of sensitization was pregnancy in 24/68, 35.3%, transfusion in 61/68, 89.7%, and previous HTx in 4/68, 5.9% patients. Multivariable analysis yielded significant protective association between desensitization and events (adjusted (adj.) hazard ratio (HR)=0.44 (95% confidence interval (95CI)=0.25-0.79), p=0.006) and deleterious association between cumulative pfDSA and events [per 1000-MFI increase, adj.HR=1.028 (1.002-1.053), p=0.031]. There was a sex-difference in the efficacy of desensitization: in men (n=35), the benefit was significant [unadj.HR=0.33 (95CI=0.14-0.78); p=0.01], but not in women (n=33) [unadj.HR=0.52 (0.23-1.17), p=0.11]. In terms of the number of patients treated, in men, 2.1 of patients that were treated prevented 1 event, while in women, 3.1 required treatment to prevent 1 event. Conclusion: Perioperative desensitization was associated with fewer AMR and deaths after HTx, and efficacy was more pronounced in men than women.

Complement Components in the Diagnosis and Treatment after Kidney Transplantation-Is There a Missing Link?

Currently, kidney transplantation is widely accepted as the renal replacement therapy allowing for the best quality of life and longest survival of patients developing end-stage renal disease. However, chronic transplant rejection, recurrence of previous kidney disease or newly acquired conditions, or immunosuppressive drug toxicity often lead to a deterioration of kidney allograft function over time. Complement components play an important role in the pathogenesis of kidney allograft impairment. Most studies on the role of complement in kidney graft function focus on humoral rejection; however, complement has also been associated with cell mediated rejection, post-transplant thrombotic microangiopathy, the recurrence of several glomerulopathies in the transplanted kidney, and transplant tolerance. Better understanding of the complement involvement in the transplanted kidney damage has led to the development of novel therapies that inhibit complement components and improve graft survival. The analysis of functional complotypes, based on the genotype of both graft recipient and donor, may become a valuable tool for assessing the risk of acute transplant rejection. The review summarizes current knowledge on the pathomechanisms of complement activation following kidney transplantation and the resulting diagnostic and therapeutic possibilities.

Early critical cortical infarction by anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibody: A case report and literature review.

RATIONALE: Anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies (AT1R-Abs) have been demonstrated to increase the risk of antibody-mediated rejection. We report a case of AT1R-Ab mediated rejection which caused early critical cortical infarction. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 52-year-old man with end-stage kidney disease underwent preemptive kidney transplantation (KT) from his wife. He had no immunologic risk except ABO incompatibility. Proper desensitization treatment were applied prior to KT. On postoperative day 1, he showed stable clinical course with adequate urine output, but there was no decrease in serum creatinine level and imaging studies showed hypoperfusion in the transplanted kidney. DIAGNOSES: Allograft biopsy revealed total cortical infarction with severe necrotizing vasculitis, but the medullary area was preserved. Serum AT1R-Ab concentration was elevated from 10.9 U/mL before KT to 19.1 U/mL on 7 days after KT. INTERVENTIONS: He was treated with plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin, rituximab, high-dose methylprednisolone, and bortezomib. OUTCOMES: The treatment showed a partial response, and he was discharged with 7.3 mg/dL creatinine level. At 4 months, his creatinine plateaued at 5.5 mg/dL and AT1R-Ab decreased to 3.6 U/mL. LESSONS: This case highlights the risk of early active antibody-mediated rejection by preformed AT1R-Ab, suggesting its ability to exhibit atypical histopathologic findings, such as total cortical infarction.

Analysis of therapeutic potential of monocytic myeloid-derived suppressor cells in cardiac allotransplantation.

BACKGROUND: Myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) and regulatory T cells (Tregs) are attractive immune cells to induce immune tolerance. To explore a strategy for improving the efficacy of MDSC therapies, we examined the impact of adoptive transfer of several types of MDSCs on graft rejection in a murine heart transplantation model. METHODS: We analyzed the effects of induced syngeneic and allogeneic bone marrow-derived MDSCs (BM-MDSCs) on graft survival and suppressive capacity. We also compared the ability of syngeneic monocytic MDSCs (Mo-MDSCs) and polymorphonuclear MDSCs (PMN-MDSCs) to inhibit graft rejection and investigated the suppression mechanisms. RESULTS: Both syngeneic and allogeneic donor- or allogeneic third-party-derived BM-MDSCs prolonged graft survival, although syngeneic BM-MDSCs inhibited anti-donor immune responses most effectively in vitro. Syngeneic Mo-MDSCs, rather than PMN-MDSCs, were responsible for immune suppression through downregulating inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and expanded naturally occurring thymic originated Treg (nTreg) in vitro. Adoptive transfer of Mo-MDSCs, but not PMN-MDSCs, prolonged graft survival and increased Treg infiltration into the graft heart. CONCLUSION: Recipient-derived Mo-MDSCs are most effective in prolonging graft survival via inhibiting T cell response and nTreg infiltration.