Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Armas de Fuego , Violencia con Armas , Homicidio , Mortalidad , Población Rural , Adolescente , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia con Armas/etnología , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia con Armas/tendencias , Homicidio/etnología , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Homicidio/tendencias , Mortalidad/etnología , Mortalidad/tendencias , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Rural/tendencias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Urbana/tendencias , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/etnología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidadRESUMEN
Importance: Black individuals are disproportionately exposed to gun violence in the US. Suicide rates among Black US individuals have increased in recent years. Objective: To evaluate whether gun violence exposures (GVEs) are associated with suicidal ideation and behaviors among Black adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study used survey data collected from a nationally representative sample of self-identified Black or African American (hereafter, Black) adults in the US from April 12, 2023, through May 4, 2023. Exposures: Ever being shot, being threatened with a gun, knowing someone who has been shot, and witnessing or hearing about a shooting. Main Outcomes and Measures: Outcome variables were derived from the Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview, including suicidal ideation, suicide attempt preparation, and suicide attempt. A subsample of those exhibiting suicidal ideation was used to assess for suicidal behaviors. Results: The study sample included 3015 Black adults (1646 [55%] female; mean [SD] age, 46.34 [0.44] years [range, 18-94 years]). Most respondents were exposed to at least 1 type of gun violence (1693 [56%]), and 300 (12%) were exposed to at least 3 types of gun violence. Being threatened with a gun (odds ratio [OR], 1.44; 95% CI, 1.01-2.05) or knowing someone who has been shot (OR, 1.44; 95% CI, 1.05-1.97) was associated with reporting lifetime suicidal ideation. Being shot was associated with reporting ever planning a suicide (OR, 3.73; 95% CI, 1.10-12.64). Being threatened (OR, 2.41; 95% CI, 2.41-5.09) or knowing someone who has been shot (OR, 2.86; 95% CI, 1.42-5.74) was associated with reporting lifetime suicide attempts. Cumulative GVE was associated with reporting lifetime suicidal ideation (1 type: OR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.19-2.39]; 2 types: OR, 1.69 [95% CI, 1.17-2.44]; ≥3 types: OR, 2.27 [95% CI, 1.48-3.48]), suicide attempt preparation (≥3 types; OR, 2.37; 95% CI, 2.37-5.63), and attempting suicide (2 types: OR, 4.78 [95% CI, 1.80-12.71]; ≥3 types: OR, 4.01 [95% CI, 1.41-11.44]). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study, GVE among Black adults in the US was significantly associated with lifetime suicidal ideation and behavior. Public health efforts to substantially reduce interpersonal gun violence may yield additional benefits by decreasing suicide among Black individuals in the US.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Exposición a la Violencia , Violencia con Armas , Suicidio , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Población Negra/psicología , Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Exposición a la Violencia/etnología , Exposición a la Violencia/psicología , Exposición a la Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia con Armas/etnología , Violencia con Armas/psicología , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia/etnología , Violencia/psicología , Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio/etnología , Suicidio/psicología , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Ideación Suicida , Intento de Suicidio/etnología , Intento de Suicidio/psicología , Intento de Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Motivated by disparities in gun violence, sharp increases in gun ownership, and a changing gun policy landscape, we conducted a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults (n=2,778) in 2021 to compare safety-related views of white, Black, and Hispanic gun owners and non-owners. Black gun owners were most aware of homicide disparities and least expecting of personal safety improvements from gun ownership or more permissive gun carrying. Non-owner views differed. Health equity and policy opportunities are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Violencia con Armas , Propiedad , Seguridad , Adulto , Humanos , Negro o Afroamericano/psicología , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia con Armas/etnología , Violencia con Armas/psicología , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Equidad en Salud , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Homicidio , Propiedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Blanco/psicología , Blanco/estadística & datos numéricos , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
The United States is distinct among high-income countries for its problem with gun violence, with Americans 25 times more likely to be killed by gun homicide than people in other high-income countries.1 Suicides make up a majority of annual gun deaths - though that gap is closing as homicides are on the rise - and the U.S. accounts for 35% of global firearm suicides despite making up only 4% of the world's population.2 More concerning, gun deaths are only getting worse. In 2021, firearm fatalities approached 50,000, the highest we have seen in at least 40 years.3 The increase in homicides in conjunction with lower crime overall further suggests an problem specifically with guns.4 As devastating as these deaths are, it does not come close to encompassing the mass toll of America's gun violence epidemic - a toll that disproportionately impacts people of color, with the Black community suffering at the highest rates. A broader and more accurate view of what constitutes gun violence must become a part of the national discourse if we are going to develop effective strategies to combat this crisis.5.
Asunto(s)
Violencia con Armas , Humanos , Población Negra/estadística & datos numéricos , Epidemias/prevención & control , Epidemias/estadística & datos numéricos , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia con Armas/etnología , Violencia con Armas/prevención & control , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Suicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Firearm violence is a significant public health problem, particularly among youth in the United States. Regardless of the data source or setting, young Black men have consistently been found to be disproportionately affected by firearm injuries and deaths. Public health research indicates that racial segregation likely increases racial disparities in firearm violence. To minimize deaths and injuries due to firearms and their cascading health consequences and to ultimately achieve health equity, preventive efforts will need to address the social determinants of health, including racism.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano , Violencia con Armas/etnología , Equidad en Salud , Racismo , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/etnología , Adolescente , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Niño , Femenino , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Incidencia , Internacionalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Distribución por Sexo , Estados Unidos , Población Urbana , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Firearm injuries (GSW) are a growing public health concern and leading cause of morbidity and mortality among children, yet predictors of injury remain understudied. This study examines the correlates of pediatric GSW within our county. METHODS: We retrospectively queried an urban Level 1 trauma center registry for pediatric (0-18â¯years) GSW from September 2013 to January 2019, examining demographic, clinical, and injury information. We used a geographic information system to map GSW rates and perform spatial and spatiotemporal cluster analysis to identify zip code "hot spots." RESULTS: 393 cases were identified. The cohort was 877% male, 87% African American, 10% Hispanic, and 22% Caucasian/Other. Injuries were 92% violence-related and 4% accidental, with 63% occurring outside school hours. Mortality was 12%, with 53% of deaths occurring in the resuscitation unit. Zip-level GSW rates ranged from 0 to 9 (per 1000â¯<â¯18â¯years) by incident address and 0-6 by home address. Statistically significant hot spots were in predominantly underserved African American and Hispanic neighborhoods. CONCLUSIONS: Geodemographic analysis of pediatric GSW injuries can be utilized to identify at-risk neighborhoods. This methodology is applicable to other metropolitan areas where targeted interventions can reduce the burden of gun violence among children. TYPE OF STUDY: Retrospective study. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Violencia con Armas , Heridas por Arma de Fuego , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Florida/epidemiología , Violencia con Armas/etnología , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Mortalidad , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Centros Traumatológicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/etnologíaAsunto(s)
Armas de Fuego/legislación & jurisprudencia , Violencia con Armas/etnología , Homicidio/etnología , Grupos Raciales/etnología , Adulto , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia con Armas/prevención & control , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Homicidio/prevención & control , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Estudios Observacionales como Asunto , Pobreza/prevención & control , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Características de la Residencia/clasificación , Clase Social , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: With the addition of the "with limited prosocial emotions" specifier within the diagnosis of conduct disorder (DSM-5) and of conduct-dissocial disorder (ICD-11) to designate those with elevated callous-unemotional traits, the authors examined the role that callous-unemotional traits play in the risk for gun carrying and gun use during a crime in a sample at high risk for gun violence. METHODS: Male juvenile offenders (N=1,215) from three regions of the United States were assessed after their first arrest and then reassessed every 6 months for 36 months and again at 48 months. Callous-unemotional traits and peer gun carrying and ownership were measured via self-report after the first arrest (i.e., baseline). Gun carrying and use of a gun during a crime were self-reported at all follow-up points. RESULTS: Callous-unemotional traits at baseline increased the frequency of gun carrying and the likelihood of using a gun during a crime across the subsequent 4 years after accounting for other risk factors. Furthermore, callous-unemotional traits moderated the relationship between peer gun carrying and ownership and participant gun carrying, such that only participants low on callous-unemotional traits demonstrated increased gun carrying as a function of their peers' gun carrying and ownership. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the importance of considering callous-unemotional traits in gun violence research both because callous-unemotional traits increase gun carrying and use in adolescents and because the traits may moderate other key risk factors. Notably, the influence of peer gun carrying and ownership may have been underestimated in past research for the majority of adolescents by not considering the moderating influence of callous-unemotional traits.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno de Personalidad Antisocial , Trastorno de la Conducta , Emociones , Armas de Fuego , Violencia con Armas , Influencia de los Compañeros , Adolescente , Agresión , Trastorno de Personalidad Antisocial/diagnóstico , Trastorno de Personalidad Antisocial/etiología , Trastorno de Personalidad Antisocial/psicología , Trastorno de la Conducta/diagnóstico , Trastorno de la Conducta/epidemiología , Trastorno de la Conducta/psicología , Criminales/psicología , Armas de Fuego/legislación & jurisprudencia , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Psiquiatría Forense/métodos , Violencia con Armas/etnología , Violencia con Armas/prevención & control , Violencia con Armas/psicología , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Propiedad , Inventario de Personalidad , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
In the United States, firearm homicides disproportionately occur in urban areas. We examine whether the same is true for fatal police shootings. We use data on fatal police shootings from Washington Post's "Fatal Force Database" (2015-2017). Using Census population estimates, we examine rates of fatal police shootings, stratified by race/ethnicity (White, Black, Hispanic), across urban and rural areas using five different classification schemes. Two classification schemes-from the National Center for Health Statistics and the US Department of Agriculture-use counties as the basic unit. Three classification schemes-from the National Center for Education Statistics, the US Census Bureau, and the website "FiveThirtyEight" use zip codes. There were just under 1000 fatal police shootings per year from 2015 to 2017, a rate of 0.31 per 100,000 population. Black victimization rates were more than twice those for Whites, with Hispanic victimization rates in between. Across all classification schemes there was little difference in rates of fatal police shootings between urban and rural areas, with suburbs having somewhat lower rates. Among Whites, rates of fatal police shooting victimization were higher in rural areas compared to urban areas, while among Blacks the rates were higher in more urban areas. Our results suggest that efforts to reduce police shootings of civilians should include rural and suburban as well as urban areas.
Asunto(s)
Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Homicidio/estadística & datos numéricos , Policia/estadística & datos numéricos , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/mortalidad , Femenino , Violencia con Armas/etnología , Humanos , Masculino , Mortalidad/tendencias , Estados Unidos , Población UrbanaRESUMEN
Firearm-related violence is a significant threat to public health and safety in America. However, research highlights a critical disparity in firearm-related deaths by race. Researchers often cite racial bias as a contributing factor for the racial disparity in firearm-related deaths. To provide a foundation for potential social work interventions, the present article discusses the results of an assessment of whether explicit racial biases toward four racial and ethnic groups (white, black, Asian, Hispanic/Latino), fear of crime, and the quantity and quality of interactions with neighbors of a different race are predictors of gun ownership. Findings suggest that explicit racial bias toward black, Asian, and Hispanic/Latino individuals is a significant predictor of gun ownership. Fear of crime and more frequent interactions with neighbors of a different race are also significant predictors of gun ownership. Taken as a whole, findings suggest that gun owners are more likely to be more vigilant toward people of color because of stereotypical assumptions that racial and ethnic minorities are more likely to be involved with crime. Social work practice and policy implications include developing interventions aimed at reducing implicit bias and identifying policies that are associated with lower levels of implicit bias among gun owners.
Asunto(s)
Crimen/etnología , Miedo , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Propiedad/estadística & datos numéricos , Racismo , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Pueblo Asiatico/estadística & datos numéricos , Crimen/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Violencia con Armas/etnología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Servicio Social , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to discern the relationship between state-level structural racism and Black-White disparities in police shootings of victims not known to be armed. METHODS: Using a Poisson regression, we evaluated the effect of structural racism on differences between states in Black-White disparities in fatal police shootings involving victims not known to be armed during the period from January 1, 2013 through June 30, 2017. We created a state racism index, which was comprised of five dimensions: (1) residential segregation; and gaps in (2) incarceration rates; (3) educational attainment; (4) economic indicators; and (5) employment status. RESULTS: After controlling for numerous state-level factors and for the underlying rate of fatal shootings of black victims in each state, the state racism index was a significant predictor of the Black-White disparity in police shooting rates of victims not known to be armed (incidence rate ratio: 1.24; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.50). For every 10-point increase in the state racism index, the Black-White disparity ratio of police shooting rates of people not known to be armed increased by 24%. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that structural racism is an important predictor of the Black-White disparity in rates of police shootings of unarmed victims across states.
Asunto(s)
Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Violencia con Armas/etnología , Homicidio/etnología , Policia/estadística & datos numéricos , Racismo , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Estatus Económico , Escolaridad , Empleo , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Características de la Residencia , Segregación Social , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Describe trends in non-Hispanic black infant mortality (IM) in the New York City (NYC) counties of Bronx, Kings, Queens, and Manhattan and correlations with gun-related assault mortality. METHODS: Linked Birth/Infant Death data (1999-2013) and Compressed Mortality data at ages 1 to ≥85 years (1999-2013). NYC and United States (US) Census data for income inequality and poverty. Pearson coefficients were used to describe correlations of IM with gun-related assault mortality and other causes of death. RESULTS: In NYC, the risk of non-Hispanic black IM in 2013 was 49% lower than in 1995 (rate ratio: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.43, 0.61). Yearly declines between 1999 and 2013 were significantly correlated with declines in gun-related assault mortality (correlation coefficient (r) = 0.70, p = 0.004), drug-related mortality (r = 0.59, p = 0.020), major heart disease and stroke (r = 0.85, p < 0.001), malignant neoplasms (r = 0.57, p = 0.026), diabetes mellitus (r = 0.63, p = 0.011), and pneumonia and influenza (r = 0.78, p < 0.001). There were no significant correlations of IM with chronic lower respiratory or liver disease, non-drug-related accidental deaths, and non-gun-related assault. Yearly IM (1995-2012) was inversely correlated with income share of the top 1% of the population (r = -0.66, p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: In NYC, non-Hispanic black IM declined significantly despite increasing income inequality and was strongly correlated with gun-related assault mortality and other major causes of death. These data are compatible with the hypothesis that activities related to overall population health, including those pertaining to gun-related homicide, may provide clues to reducing IM. Analytic epidemiological studies are needed to test these and other hypotheses formulated from these descriptive data.