The application of microwaves in axillary hyperhidrosis: Curative effect observation of a pathological examination over 1 year.

BACKGROUND: In Asia, axillary hyperhidrosis is a frequent problem for many people, and the consequent excessive sweating can seriously affect many aspects of daily life and even lead to mental disorders. Microwave therapy is a new, non-invasive treatment method for axillary hyperhidrosis, whose energy and long-term effectiveness still needs to be clinically validated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical efficacy, safety, histological changes, and psychological status of microwave devices in the treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis. METHOD: We conducted a prospective self-controlled study in a top-tier Chinese hospital. After a 5/5 energy treatment session, a skin biopsy was taken to observe histological changes both before and after treatment. An iodine starch test was used to determine the sweating range. We evaluated symptoms of improved efficacy using the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) and assessed changes in life status with the DLQI. In the case of concurrent underarm odor, odor-5, VAS, and Young-Jin Park grading were used to assess odor relief. The effect of odor on psychology was assessed by using a psychological status symptom checklist (scl-90). The study period was 1 year. RESULTS: We observed 20 patients in this study. Of those, 90% met the primary treatment endpoint of a decrease in axillary hyperhidrosis symptomatology to below grade 2 on the HDSS score (p < 0.001). Furthermore, 75% of patients achieved a treatment endpoint of at least 50% reduction in VAS (p < 0.001). 70% of patients achieved a treatment endpoint of at least 50% reduction in odor-5 (p < 0.001). The iodine starch test showed that the region decreased 99% from the baseline to 12 months after follow-up had ended (p < 0.001). Eight patients volunteered to undergo histological examination; their average light density of immunohistochemistry decreased from 1.04 (0.4-2.11) to 0.07 (0.04-0.46; p < 0.05). The immunohistochemical positive number for sweat glands was initially 104 (59.75-132.5) but was 41.5 (29.75-62) after the procedure. None of the patients experienced any serious adverse reactions. CONCLUSION: The treatment demonstrated high effectiveness, safety, and short-lived adverse reactions.

Treatment of Palmar Hyperhidrosis With Radiofrequency Microneedling-Based on Ultrasound Measurements.

This study addresses the treatment of palmar hyperhidrosis, which has been difficult to manage. A new treatment has been developed using radiofrequency microneedling to reduce sweating non-surgically by ablating sweat glands. Based on ultrasound measurements of the dermis and precise microneedling damage, effective energy was applied to locate the sweat glands and disabled their function. Radiofrequency microneedling with ultrasound can safely and effectively treat hyperhidrosis in a minimally invasive way.

Hyperhidrosis: A targeted literature review of the disease burden.

Hyperhidrosis is a chronic skin condition characterized by excessive sweating. It poses a burden on affected people, reducing their quality of life and productivity. We undertook a targeted literature review (TLR) to gather current evidence on the epidemiology as well as the human and economic burden posed on patients with hyperhidrosis. Searches were performed in Medline database (access via OVID interface) and ICHUSHI database. Articles published between January 2000 and September 2020 that analyzed at least 50 patients were included. Sixty-four publications were identified and 38 publications covering a unique domain were selected to inform this TLR. The incidence of hyperhidrosis ranged from 0.13% in the UK to 0.28% in the USA, with a higher rate in females. The prevalence of hyperhidrosis varied from 2.8%-4.8% in the US general population to 18.40% in Chinese inpatients, while the prevalence of axillary hyperhidrosis varied from 1.4% in the US general population to 5.75% in Japanese employees/students. Due to excessive sweating, hyperhidrosis was reported to be a moderate-to-extreme limitation at work for the US patients, with 33.5% feeling unhappy. Patients' satisfaction was high post-treatment. Considerable costs were related to the treatment with botulinum toxin and surgery. Hospital stays for surgery lasted from 10 h to 3 days. The percentage of patients who sought a medical consultation varied from 6.3% for Japanese patients with primary focal hyperhidrosis to 51% for the US general population with any type of hyperhidrosis. There is limited evidence of the hyperhidrosis burden, particularly among Japanese patients; however, the burden was high and limited patients' daily functioning. Future actions should include implementation of educational programs to raise awareness of the condition, conduct of larger studies, and generation of more evidence. Understanding the nature of hyperhidrosis and the burden it poses is of utmost importance.

Compensatory Hyperhidrosis After Non-Surgical Treatment of Primary Focal Hyperhidrosis: Two-Year Single-Centered Prospective Study From Jordan.

BACKGROUND: Primary focal hyperhidrosis (PH) can be managed by a wide range of medical and surgical modalities. Compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH) is a well-documented complication of surgical treatment. We aimed to investigate the occurrence of compensatory hyperhidrosis (CH) in PH patients after nonsurgical treatment with botulinum toxin A (BTX- A) or iontophoresis. METHODOLOGY: We carried out a unicentric prospective study on PH patients from King Abdullah University Hospital (KAUH) in Jordan. PH patients were evaluated after 1-month of nonsurgical treatment. Patients who developed CH were re-assessed after 3-6 months through a telephone-based interview. RESULTS: A total of 86 patients with PH who underwent nonsurgical treatment with iontophoresis or botulinum toxin were recruited. Twenty-four (27.9%) patients developed subjective CH. It was mild in (75%), moderate in (21%), and severe in (4%) of patients affected, it was self-limiting within a few months in all patients. Patients with CH did not differ significantly in demographic or clinical variables from patients who did not develop CH except at the site of PH (p value = .05). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that more than quarter (27.9%) of patients with PH may develop minor compensatory sweating, however this didn't affect satisfaction with treatment.

A single session of high-energy microwave axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis therapy: Key pretherapeutic assessment and outcome analysis.

BACKGROUND: Microwave therapy is used to treat axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis. Even while a "danger zone" has been identified and reports of potential complications from nerve injury have been made, there has been little real-world discussion regarding whether there is any pretreatment evaluation key factor that may lower the risk. Furthermore, the efficacy of a single treatment and the safety of high-energy therapies have not been well investigated. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to demonstrate the key aspects of pre-therapeutic assessment, efficacy, and suitability of a single treatment, as well as the safety of high-energy treatments. METHODS: Fifteen patients with axillary hyperhidrosis (AH) and axillary osmidrosis (AO) between ages of 20 and 50 had pretherapeutic ultrasonography and clinical assessments performed followed by a single-pass microwave treatment using the miraDry system at energy level 5. The severity of AH and AO was evaluated using the Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale and Odor-10 scale, respectively, at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, and 1 year after treatment. Adverse reactions were recorded at each point of evaluation. RESULTS: Out of 30 treatment areas, 14 have a danger zone. Female gender, a small mid-upper arm circumference, and a low body mass index (BMI) are all associated risk factors. The average Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale score decreased from 3.1 ± 0.7 to 1.3 ± 0.5 (p < 0.001), while the odor-10 score declined from 7.1 ± 1.6 to 3.0 ± 1.6 (p < 0.001), indicating a significant improvement in AH and AO. Most of the unfavorable treatment effects disappeared within the first month. LIMITATIONS: This study has no objective quantitative measurement of axillary odor severity and sweat assessment. CONCLUSION: Female patients, those with a smaller mid-upper arm circumference, and those with a low BMI should be treated with extra caution, and the tumescent anesthetic dose may be increased based on safety. A high-energy microwave treatment procedure performed in a single session is a safe and effective therapeutic option with good recovery.

Impact of microwave thermolysis energy levels on patient-reported outcomes for axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis.

OBJECTIVE: Microwave thermolysis (MWT) is an emerging treatment for axillary hyperhidrosis reducing both sweat and odor. No prior studies have investigated and compared the different available energy settings of the MWT device. This study evaluated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis following MWT treatment with two different energy levels. METHODS: Twenty adults with axillary hyperhidrosis and osmidrosis reported sweat on Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity scale (HDSS: 1-4) and odor on Odor scale (OS: 1-10), respectively, supplemented by overall Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI: 0-30). This was a prospective, randomized, patient-blinded and intraindividually controlled study with 3 months follow-up (FU). Randomization comprised MWT treatment of one axilla with a standard medium energy setting (energy level 3) and the contralateral axilla with a standard high energy setting (energy level 5). RESULTS: At baseline, patients reported substantial sweat and odor, negatively affecting their quality of life. At 3 months FU, PROMs showed improved quality of life with significantly reduced odor and sweat. Overall DLQI was reduced from a median of 10 to 4, with a median 6.5-point reduction (p = 0.0002). HDSS was reduced from a median of 4 to 2 on both sides, with a median reduction of 1 for medium energy level and 2 points for high energy level (p = 0.014). OS was reduced from a median of 8 to 3 for both energy levels, with a median reduction of 3.5 and 4.5 points for the medium and high energy level, respectively (p = 0.017). Local skin reactions were mild and transient, but slightly more pronounced following treatment with the high energy level. CONCLUSION: MWT effectively improved patients' quality of life, axillary sweat, and odor 3 months after on baseline treatment. Treatment with the high energy level presented a subtle but significant increase of efficacy based on PROMs for both sweat and odor. Patients were willing to accept a higher amount of temporary local skin reactions from a higher energy setting when experiencing greater odor and sweat reduction.

Questionnaire-based epidemiological survey of primary focal hyperhidrosis and survey on current medical management of primary axillary hyperhidrosis in Japan.

To obtain current epidemiological information on primary focal hyperhidrosis in Japan, a large epidemiological survey was conducted using a web-based questionnaire. The prevalence of primary focal hyperhidrosis was 10.0% and the site-specific prevalence was highest for primary axillary hyperhidrosis (5.9%). The proportion of respondents with primary focal hyperhidrosis who had consulted a physician was 4.6%, which was similar to the low prevalence reported previously in 2013 in Japan. A questionnaire survey for physicians and individuals with primary axillary hyperhidrosis on the current medical management of primary axillary hyperhidrosis showed that physicians recognized the existence of patients who were very worried about hyperhidrosis, but failed to provide active treatment. Regarding the information provided by patients to physicians at presentation, it was found that patients failed to provide sufficient information to the physicians about their worries in daily life. Among individuals who had sought medical care with primary axillary hyperhidrosis, 62.3% reported that they were not currently receiving treatment, highlighting a challenge to be addressed regarding continued treatment. Frequently chosen options leading to willingness to receive treatment were less expensive treatment and highly effective treatment as well as feeling free to consult a physician, suggesting a desire for an improved medical environment.

Percutaneous Radiofrequency Sympatholysis in the Treatment of Primary Palmar Hyperhidrosis: A Retrospective Case-Controlled Study of Rib-Based Anatomical Targeting.

PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy, adverse reactions, quality of life, and patient satisfaction of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) thoracic sympatholysis at different rib-based anatomic targets for primary palmar hyperhidrosis (PPHH). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with PPHH were divided according to the target, namely, the upper edge (Group U) and lateral border (Group L) of the fourth rib; there were 30 patients (mean age, 24.9 years; women, 31, 51.7%) and 60 cases in each group. The Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) were assessed. RESULTS: From before RF sympatholysis to 12 months after, the proportion of patients with HDSS Grades III and IV (100%-26.7%) and the DLQI (19.78 ± 5.08 to 4.98 ± 4.18) decreased significantly (P < .001). At 3, 6, and 12 months after RF, the HDSS grades were better in Group L than in Group U (P = .005, .002, and .004). At 6 and 12 months after RF, the DLQI in Group L was lower than that in Group U (P = .012 and .016), and at 1, 6, and 12 months after RF, patient satisfaction was higher than that in Group U (P = .025, .014, and .009). Adverse events were mild; 8 patients (13.3%) demonstrated compensatory hyperhidrosis at 12 months after RF, and there was no difference between the 2 groups (P = .448); neuralgia and pneumothorax also did not differ (P = .522 and .643). CONCLUSIONS: RF sympatholysis targeting the lateral border of the fourth rib had higher efficacy, better quality of life, and higher patient satisfaction.

Bromhidrosis treatment modalities: A literature review.

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for Bromhidrosis include botulinum toxin therapy, microwave-based therapy, laser therapy, and surgical intervention. Limited studies compare their efficacies. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this literature review is to compare the efficacy and safety of these treatments for bromhidrosis. METHODS: A PubMed search included terms bromhidrosis and bromhidrosis AND treatment. RESULTS: A total of 25 articles were reviewed. Botulinum toxin therapy shows consistent benefit but requires repeated therapies. Microwave therapies have shown promising results but require larger cohort sizes with bromhidrosis. Similarly, laser therapy has shown promise with biopsy-proven results, but long-lasting effects remain unknown. Surgery has the best long-term prognosis, but the ideal surgical method remains unknown. LIMITATIONS: Each study varied in their treatment interval and method of assessing bromhidrosis, making direct comparisons difficult. CONCLUSIONS: Managing bromhidrosis requires shared decision making with the patient. Mild-to-moderate symptoms may be treated initially with botulinum toxin therapy. In cases that are refractory, laser therapy should be considered, as it is better studied than microwave therapy currently. Lastly, if the condition is severe and refractory to other options, surgery can be considered, although the ideal method remains unknown.

A Pilot Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of a Novel Device in Subjects With Axillary Hyperhidrosis.

BACKGROUND: One-third of U.S. adults are bothered by excessive sweating and 5% suffer from hyperhidrosis, both of which negatively affect quality-of-life (QoL). A single-use disposable patch using the novel targeted alkali thermolysis (TAT) technology is being developed to address this condition. OBJECTIVE: Assess the efficacy and safety of the TAT patch for the treatment of excessive sweating using a randomized, double-blind, sham-controlled study design. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Adults with Hyperhidrosis Disease Severity Scale (HDSS) scores of 3 or 4 ( n = 16) were treated with an active or sham patch for up to 3 minutes (as established in a previous unpublished feasibility study) and evaluated weekly for 6 weeks post-treatment. The primary effectiveness measure was improved HDSS at Week-4. RESULTS: The study met its objective. For the primary efficacy measure, 83% of TAT-treated subjects reported HDSS scores of 1 or 2 at Week-4 versus 0% of sham-treated subjects ( p = .0032). Furthermore, 67% of TAT-treated subjects had a 2-point improvement in HDSS scores versus 0% of sham-treated subjects ( p = .0123). Quality-of-life improvement correlated with HDSS. The TAT patch seemed to be well-tolerated; one transient moderate adverse event that resolved without sequelae was reported. CONCLUSION: The TAT patch successfully demonstrated efficacy and was well-tolerated.

Treatment of Hyperhidrosis: An Update.

Hyperhidrosis is a dermatosis presenting as pathologically excessive focal or generalized sweating. The stigmatizing nature of hyperhidrosis may cause patients to feel embarrassment and apprehension about their symptoms and experience a significant decrease in well-being. Severe cases of hyperhidrosis can also increase the risk of developing psychiatric and somatic comorbidities. Conventional non-surgical treatments of hyperhidrosis include aluminum salts, iontophoresis, botulinum toxin injections, and oral glycopyrronium. In recent years, new topical anticholinergic medications and devices have emerged that may improve the patients' symptoms and even prevent the development of comorbidities. The treatment of hyperhidrosis can be a complex matter and may require the combination of several therapies. The purpose of this paper was to firstly review the literature on existing non-surgical treatment options for hyperhidrosis, and secondly provide a stepwise approach to investigating and treating patients with hyperhidrosis.

Potential use of microwave technology in dermatology.

BACKGROUND: Microwaves are used in medicine for diagnostics, and treatment of cancer. Recently, novel microwave devices (Swift®, Emblation Ltd, UK and miraDry®, Miramar Labs Inc., CA) have been cleared by the FDA and Health Canada for various dermatological conditions. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS: To review the dermatological use of microwave-based treatments (plantar warts, corns, actinic keratosis, dermatophytosis, axillary hyperhidrosis, osmidrosis, and hidradenitis suppurativa). Clinical trials, case reports, or in vitro studies for each condition are summarized. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION: Microwaves are a promising alternative therapy for cutaneous warts, actinic keratosis, axillary hyperhidrosis, and osmidrosis, with favorable safety profiles. However, patients with hidradenitis suppurativa have had negative clinical outcomes. Limited treatment of corns showed good pain reduction but did not resolve hyperkeratosis. A preliminary in vitro study indicated that microwave treatment inhibits the growth of T. rubrum. We present the first case of toenail onychomycosis successfully treated with microwaves. Despite the advancements in the use of microwaves, the mechanism of action in non-ablative treatment is not well understood; further research is needed. More high-quality randomized clinical trials with larger groups and long follow-up periods are also required to evaluate the clinical benefits and possible adverse effects of microwaves in treating dermatological conditions.

Setting research priorities for management and treatment of hyperhidrosis: the results of the James Lind Alliance Priority Setting Partnership.

BACKGROUND: Hyperhidrosis is a common skin condition characterized by excessive sweating, which can negatively impact on quality of life. It is under-researched compared with other conditions of similar prevalence. AIM: To generate a Top 10 list of research priorities for the treatment and management of hyperhidrosis, with equal input from people with hyperhidrosis and healthcare professionals (HCPs). METHODS: A priority setting partnership (PSP) was established and processes from the James Lind Alliance Handbook were followed. An online survey asked participants what questions they would like research to answer. These questions were grouped into 'indicative questions', which were ranked in a second survey of 45 indicative questions. The top 23 questions were then taken to a final workshop event attended by key stakeholders, and ranked to generate the Top 10 list of research priorities. RESULTS: There were 592 questions submitted by 268 respondents for the first survey. For the second survey, 286 participants ranked the indicative questions in order of priority. At the final workshop, the Top 10 list was generated. The top three priorities were: (i) Are there any safe and effective permanent solutions for hyperhidrosis? (ii) What is the most effective and safe oral treatment (drugs taken by mouth) for hyperhidrosis? and (iii) What are the most effective and safe ways to reduce sweating in particular areas of the body? CONCLUSIONS: There are many unanswered research questions that both people with hyperhidrosis and HCPs would like to see answered. The results from this PSP will help to ensure future research funding can be directed to these areas of priority.

Hyperhidrosis Comorbidities and Treatments: A Register-based Study among 511 Subjects.

Hyperhidrosis is a dermatological condition that causes psychosocial impairment and has a negative impact on patients' quality of life. The epidemiology of hyperhidrosis is currently poorly understood. The aim of this study was to analyse comorbidities and treatments in 511 subjects with hyperhidrosis selected from the patient records of Oulu University Hospital. The mean age of patients with local hyperhidrosis was 27.9 years and the majority were female (62.7%). The most common anatomical site of symptoms in the youngest age group was the palms, whereas the axillae were a more common site in advanced age. Depression was a common comorbidity in both local (11.6%) and generalized hyperhidrosis (28.6%). Anxiety affected 12.7% of patients with generalized hyperhidrosis. In 36.8% of the patients with local hyperhidrosis there was a delay in diagnosis of more than 10 years. The most commonly used treatments included topical antiperspirants, iontophoresis and botulin toxin injections.

Comparison of 10 versus 20 sessions tap water iontophoresis efficacy in the treatment of palmoplantar hyperhidrosis.

BACKGROUND: Tap water iontophoresis (TWI) is an effective treatment option for palmoplantar hyperhidrosis (HH). However, the optimal number and frequency of TWI sessions to control profuse sweating are unclear. OBJECTIVE: To compare the efficacy of 10 and 20 sessions of TWI in patients with palmoplantar HH and determine the adequate number of sessions to achieve a favorable clinical response. METHODS: Eighty patients treated with TWI for palmoplantar HH were included. The alteration in sweating intensity considering the mean value of gravimetric measurement and mean visual analog scale (VAS) scores after the 10th and 20th session of TWI were calculated. The difference between performing 10 and 20 sessions of TWI in providing improvement of HH was analyzed. We also conducted a telephone-based inquiry to determine the patients' outcome. RESULTS: The reduction in sweating intensity was significant both after the 10th (p < 0.001) and 20th (p < 0.001) sessions when compared with the basal level considering gravimetry and VAS. When the mean sweating intensity after the 10th and 20th sessions were compared, no difference was observed gravimetrically (p = 0.03); the difference between the mean score of VAS after the 10th and 20th sessions (p < 0.001) was significant. Eleven and nine patients not considering a maintenance or an alternative treatment had lower and same sweating intensity as compared with the baseline, respectively. CONCLUSION: Ten TWI sessions within two weeks for managing palmoplantar HH are adequate to achieve a clinical response. However, the patients are more satisfied when they receive 20 sessions instead of 10 sessions of TWI.

Subcutaneous tissue necrosis with fat liquefaction, hematoma, inflammatory mass after microwave-based treatment for axillary hyperhidrosis.

Axillary hyperhidrosis (AH) and bromhidrosis are common complaints in Asians for consultation in dermatology. A microwave-based device has gradually become a first option option during this decade because of the safety and efficacy both for AH and osmidrosis. Other complications reported are transient median and ulnar neuropathy and brachial plexus injury with sensory and motor dysfunction. We herein report a rare case of subcutaneous tissue necrosis with fat liquefaction, hematoma that occurred after microwave-based treatment. It took 3 weeks for both sides to recover completely. The case prompt us that one pass treatment for the same treatment area and cooling to relieve the pain for 24 h. Appropriate restriction of movement should be emphasized within 1 month after treatment. Moreover, caution is needed when bumps enlarged rapidly.

Treatment of Axillary hyperhidrosis.

BACKGROUND: Axillary hyperhidrosis characterized by excessive sweating in the axillary regions is a frustrating chronic autonomic disorder leading to social embarrassment, impaired quality of life and usually associated with palmoplantar hyperhidrosis. Identifying the condition and its cause is central to the management. AIM: The aim of this article is to discuss treatment options for axillary hyperhidrosis. METHODS: Comprehensive literature search using PubMed and Google Scholar was performed to review relevant published articles related to diagnosis and treatment of axillary hyperhidrosis. RESULTS: Treatment modalities for axillary hyperhydrosis vary from topical and systemic agents to injectables, newer devices and surgical measures. None except for physical measures using devices or surgery, which destroys the sweat glands to remove them, is possibly permanent and most are associated with attendant side effects. CONCLUSION: Several treatments including medical and surgical option are available for the treatment of axillary hyperhydrosis. Patient education is important component of its management. Individualized approach of management is necessary for optimal outcome of treatment.