Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
: 20 | 50 | 100
1 - 20 de 32.064
1.
J Korean Med Sci ; 39(18): e151, 2024 May 13.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742291

BACKGROUND: Catheter-associated urinary tract infections (CAUTIs) account for a large proportion of healthcare-associated infections and have a significant impact on morbidity, length of hospital stay, and mortality. Adherence to the recommended infection prevention practices can effectively reduce the incidence of CAUTIs. This study aimed to assess the characteristics of CAUTIs and the efficacy of prevention programs across hospitals of various sizes. METHODS: Intervention programs, including training, surveillance, and monitoring, were implemented. Data on the microorganisms responsible for CAUTIs, urinary catheter utilization ratio, rate of CAUTIs per 1,000 device days, and factors associated with the use of indwelling catheters were collected from 2017 to 2019. The incidence of CAUTIs and associated data were compared between university hospitals and small- and medium-sized hospitals. RESULTS: Thirty-two hospitals participated in the study, including 21 university hospitals and 11 small- and medium-sized hospitals. The microorganisms responsible for CAUTIs and their resistance rates did not differ between the two groups. In the first quarter of 2018, the incidence rate was 2.05 infections/1,000 device-days in university hospitals and 1.44 infections/1,000 device-days in small- and medium-sized hospitals. After implementing interventions, the rate gradually decreased in the first quarter of 2019, with 1.18 infections/1,000 device-days in university hospitals and 0.79 infections/1,000 device-days in small- and medium-sized hospitals. However, by the end of the study, the infection rate increased to 1.74 infections/1,000 device-days in university hospitals and 1.80 infections/1,000 device-days in small- and medium-sized hospitals. CONCLUSION: We implemented interventions to prevent CAUTIs and evaluated their outcomes. The incidence of these infections decreased in the initial phases of the intervention when adequate support and personnel were present. The rate of these infections may be reduced by implementing active interventions such as consistent monitoring and adherence to guidelines for preventing infections.


Catheter-Related Infections , Urinary Tract Infections , Humans , Urinary Tract Infections/prevention & control , Urinary Tract Infections/epidemiology , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Catheter-Related Infections/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Incidence , Infection Control/methods , Urinary Catheterization/adverse effects , Catheters, Indwelling/adverse effects , Hospitals, University , Urinary Catheters/adverse effects
2.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 657, 2024 May 22.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778319

BACKGROUND: Infection prevention and control (IPC) research has long neglected the home healthcare sector with its unique challenges. This study aimed to gain an understanding of the barriers to the implementation of infection prevention practices relevant to this setting, the related attitudes, perceived relevance and priorities from the home healthcare worker perspective in Switzerland. METHODS: The mixed-method study involved semi-structured interviews (n = 18) and an anonymous web-based survey (n = 144) among nursing assistants and nurses from two home healthcare organizations in northwest Switzerland. Questions in both sub-studies focused on perceived challenges to infection prevention practices, perceived relevance, and related attitudes and mitigation strategies. Using an exploratory-sequential design, survey questions were designed to quantify and complement the findings from the interview study. RESULTS: Healthcare workers in these two organisations felt adequately protected, trained and supported by their organisations regarding IPC (survey agreement rates > 90%). General challenges to IPC in the home environment most agreed on were lack of cleanliness, lack of space, and the priorities of the patient to be respected (survey agreement rates 85.4%, 77.1%, and 70.8%, respectively). Practices and perceived challenges in the case of colonisation with multi-drug resistant organisms (MDRO) and potentially infectious diarrheal or respiratory illnesses varied highly regarding information transfer, use of protective equipment, and use and disinfection practices of multi-use equipment. Challenges to hand hygiene, sharps safety, waste management and decontamination of equipment did not feature as a prominent concern. CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to characterise the implementation of infection prevention practices and the related challenges in home healthcare in Switzerland. Home healthcare workers describe various challenges related to infection prevention practices as largely manageable in their work routine, and generally show satisfaction with the support provided by their organisations regarding IPC precautions. Key findings regarding challenges amenable to interventions include uncertainty and inconsistency regarding the management of MDRO colonisation and acute illnesses, and gaps in information transfer. Those challenges may benefit from both organisational interventions and further research into the level of precautions that are appropriate to the home healthcare setting.


Home Care Services , Infection Control , Humans , Switzerland , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/standards , Home Care Services/standards , Home Care Services/organization & administration , Female , Male , Attitude of Health Personnel , Interviews as Topic , Adult , Middle Aged , Surveys and Questionnaires , Qualitative Research
3.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38791739

Background: Healthcare personnel (HCP) in high TB-burdened countries continue to be at high risk of occupational TB due to inadequate implementation of Tuberculosis Infection Prevention and Control (TB-IPC) measures and a lack of understanding of the context and relevance to local settings. Such transmission in the healthcare workplace has prompted the development and dissemination of numerous guidelines for strengthening TB-IPC for use in settings globally. However, a lack of involvement of healthcare personnel in the conceptualisation and development of guidelines and programmes seeking to improve TB-IPC in high-burden countries generally has been observed. Objectives: The aim of this review was to explore the inclusion of HCP in decision-making when designing the TB-IPC guidelines, in healthcare settings. Methods: A scoping review methodology was selected for this study to gain insight into the relevant research evidence, identifying and mapping key elements in the TB-IPC measures in relation to HCP as implementors. Results: Studies in this review refer to factors related to HCP's knowledge of TB-IPC, perception regarding occupational risks and behaviours, their role against a background of structural resource constraints, and guidelines' adherence. They report several challenges in TB-IPC implementation and adherence, particularly eliciting recommendations from HCP for improved TB-IPC practices. Conclusions: This review highlights a lack of participation in decision-making by the implementers of the policies and guidelines, yet adherence to TB-IPC measures is anticipated. Future research needs to focus more on consultations with users to understand the preferences from both within individual healthcare facilities and the communities. There is an urgent need for research on the participation of the implementers in the decision-making when developing TB-IPC policies and guidelines.


Health Personnel , Tuberculosis , Humans , Tuberculosis/prevention & control , Infection Control/methods
4.
Dimens Crit Care Nurs ; 43(4): 212-216, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38787778

BACKGROUND: Clostridioides difficile (C. diff) infection causes significant morbidity for hospitalized patients. A large medical intensive care unit had an increase in C. diff infection rates. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this project was to reduce the C. diff polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test positivity rate and the rate of C. diff PCR tests ordered. Rates were compared between preintervention (July 2017 to December 2019) and postintervention (January 2021 to December 2022) timeframes. METHODS: Unit leadership led a robust quality improvement project, including use of quality improvement tools such as A3, Gemba walks, and plan-do-study-act cycles. Interventions were tailored to the barriers identified, including standardization of in-room supply carts; use of single-packaged oral care kits; new enteric precautions signage; education to staff, providers, and visitors; scripting for patients and visitors; and use of a C. diff testing algorithm. Statistical process control charts were used to assess for improvements. RESULTS: The average rate of C. diff PCR test positivity decreased from 34.9 PCR positive tests per 10 000 patient days to 12.3 in the postintervention period, a 66% reduction. The average rate of PCR tests ordered was 28 per 1000 patient days in the preintervention period; this decreased 44% to 15.7 in the postintervention period. DISCUSSION: We found clinically significant improvements in the rate of C. diff infection and PCR tests ordered as a result of implementing tailored interventions in a large medical intensive care unit. Other units should consider using robust quality improvement methods and tools to conduct similar initiatives to reduce patient harm and improve care and outcomes.


Clostridium Infections , Cross Infection , Intensive Care Units , Quality Improvement , Humans , Clostridium Infections/prevention & control , Clostridium Infections/epidemiology , Clostridium Infections/diagnosis , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Clostridioides difficile/isolation & purification , Polymerase Chain Reaction , Infection Control
7.
Nurs Open ; 11(5): e2169, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38783555

AIM: To examine the perceptions of managers of elder care homes on the impact of facility and staff characteristics on infection control of COVID-19. DESIGN: Case study. METHODS: Six purposively sampled care home managers in the city of Stockholm were interviewed. Through content analysis, three categories and nine subcategories were identified. RESULTS: According to the interviewed care home managers, a home-like environment that allows for isolation of residents and possibilities for staff to get changed and store personal protective equipment outside each resident's room was considered ideal. Experienced employees were reported as invaluable when facing an infectious outbreak. A mix of permanent and temporary staff was considered essential although some thought that temporary staff who work in multiple care homes might negatively influence the spread of infection. Language barriers among staff were considered an obstacle when trying to disseminate information.


COVID-19 , Infection Control , Nursing Homes , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/psychology , COVID-19/epidemiology , Sweden , Infection Control/methods , Nursing Homes/organization & administration , SARS-CoV-2 , Female , Male , Homes for the Aged/organization & administration , Attitude of Health Personnel , Aged , Adult , Middle Aged
8.
Pediatr Clin North Am ; 71(3): 431-454, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38754934

Special pathogens are broadly defined as highly transmissible organisms capable of causing severe disease in humans. Children's hospital healthcare personnel (HCP) should be prepared to identify patients possibly infected with a special pathogen, isolate the patient to minimize transmission, and inform key infection prevention, clinical, and public health stakeholders. Effective preparedness requires resources and practice with attention to education, policies and procedures, drills and training, and supplies. Successfully preparing for special pathogens is an important measure toward keeping communities, HCP, and patients and families safe in this global age that brings pathogens from across the world to our doorstep.


Infection Control , Humans , Child , Infection Control/methods , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/microbiology
9.
BMC Public Health ; 24(1): 1403, 2024 May 27.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38802789

BACKGROUND: Patients with HIV consult traditional healers (THs). These THs can both delay care for people living with HIV (PLHIV) and transmit HIV through poor infection control practices. The main objective of this study was to evaluate knowledge and practices of THs regarding HIV in Bukavu. METHODS: A cross-sectional study using quantitative approach was carried out among 71 THs in Bukavu City. The collected data included the following topics: personal and socio-demographic characteristics, HIV knowledge, and infection control practices. Descriptive statistics, independent-samples T-test or F-test, and multiple linear regression were used to analyze the data with a p-value < 0.05. RESULTS: The THs' mean age was 49.2 ± 11.2 years, and the majority were aged 40 to < 60 years. Males constituted 88.7% of THs with a male-to-female ratio of 7.9. In general, 47.9% of study participants had poor knowledge about HIV/AIDS infection, 45.1% of them had fair knowledge, and only 7.0% had good knowledge. Overall, 43.7% of THs had poor infection control practices, 52.1% of THs had fair practices, and only 4.2% of participants had good practices. Results of multiple linear regression analysis revealed that none of the personal and demographic variables studied were significant predictors of their knowledge about HIV/AIDS (p > 0.05). In terms of practices, two variables were significant predictors of infection control practices: living in Ibanda and receiving training in taking care of HIV/AIDS. CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The study revealed that THs' knowledge about HIV infection was insufficient and that they had poor infection control practices. Formal standardized training on HIV infection should be organized for all THs so that they can always refer their patients to modern, reliable antiretroviral therapy (ART) clinics and reduce the risk of occupational exposure in their practices. Although PPE's assistance for THs is required in terms of protective measures, the province health authority must also oversee infection control procedures at THs' offices.


HIV Infections , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Medicine, African Traditional , Humans , Female , Male , HIV Infections/prevention & control , HIV Infections/therapy , Cross-Sectional Studies , Democratic Republic of the Congo , Middle Aged , Adult , Medicine, African Traditional/statistics & numerical data , Infection Control , Traditional Medicine Practitioners
10.
J Nurs Care Qual ; 39(3): E32-E38, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38780352

BACKGROUND: Oncology patients receiving chemotherapy are at a high risk for developing infections. Identifying factors that predict infection practices among these patients can help improve the quality of care provided. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to infection prevention in oncology patients receiving chemotherapy. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 170 patients with cancer. RESULTS: The majority of participants had a low to moderate level of knowledge, with high levels of attitude and practice related to infection prevention. Knowledge was a significant predictor of attitude and practice, while attitude was a predictor of infection prevention practices. Knowledge and attitude emerged as mutual predictors, which could explain 23% of the variation in practice toward infection prevention (R2 = 0.230, P = .00). CONCLUSIONS: Findings indicated that both knowledge and attitude were powerful predictors of practice toward infection prevention.


Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Neoplasms , Humans , Cross-Sectional Studies , Female , Male , Neoplasms/drug therapy , Middle Aged , Adult , Surveys and Questionnaires , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/standards , Antineoplastic Agents/therapeutic use , Antineoplastic Agents/adverse effects , Aged
11.
J Med Microbiol ; 73(5)2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38771623

The emergent fungal pathogen Candida auris is increasingly recognised as an important cause of healthcare-associated infections globally. It is highly transmissible, adaptable, and persistent, resulting in an organism with significant outbreak potential that risks devastating consequences. Progress in the ability to identify C. auris in clinical specimens is encouraging, but laboratory diagnostic capacity and surveillance systems are lacking in many countries. Intrinsic resistance to commonly used antifungals, combined with the ability to rapidly acquire resistance to therapy, substantially restricts treatment options and novel agents are desperately needed. Despite this, outbreaks can be interrupted, and mortality avoided or minimised, through the application of rigorous infection prevention and control measures with an increasing evidence base. This review provides an update on epidemiology, the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, risk factors, identification and typing, resistance profiles, treatment, detection of colonisation, and infection prevention and control measures for C. auris. This review has informed a planned 2024 update to the United Kingdom Health Security Agency (UKHSA) guidance on the laboratory investigation, management, and infection prevention and control of Candida auris. A multidisciplinary response is needed to control C. auris transmission in a healthcare setting and should emphasise outbreak preparedness and response, rapid contact tracing and isolation or cohorting of patients and staff, strict hand hygiene and other infection prevention and control measures, dedicated or single-use equipment, appropriate disinfection, and effective communication concerning patient transfers and discharge.


Antifungal Agents , COVID-19 , Candida auris , Candidiasis , Infection Control , Humans , Candidiasis/prevention & control , Candidiasis/epidemiology , Candidiasis/drug therapy , Candidiasis/microbiology , Infection Control/methods , Candida auris/drug effects , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Antifungal Agents/therapeutic use , Antifungal Agents/pharmacology , England/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/epidemiology , Cross Infection/microbiology , SARS-CoV-2 , Drug Resistance, Fungal , Candida/drug effects , Candida/classification , Candida/isolation & purification , Disease Outbreaks/prevention & control
12.
Stud Health Technol Inform ; 314: 37-41, 2024 May 23.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38785000

Tuberculosis (TB) remains a significant global health challenge. Indeed, according to the World Health Organization (WHO), TB is classified as the second most common cause of death worldwide due to a single infectious agent in 2022, following COVID-19. To effectively manage tuberculosis patients, it is necessary to ensure accurate diagnosis, prompt treatment initiation, and vigilant monitoring of patients' progress. In 2017, the TB Ge network was implemented and launched in two primary hospitals within the Liguria Region in Italy, with the main purpose to manage tuberculosis infections. This system, organized as a web-based tool, simplifies the manual input of patient's data and therapies, while automating the integration of test results from hospitals' Laboratory Information Systems (LIS), without requiring human intervention. The goal of this paper is to highlight the outcomes achieved through the implementation of the TB Ge network in a period seriously affected by the COVID-19 pandemia and outline future directions. More specifically, the aim is to extend its adoption to all hospitals in the Liguria Region, thus improving the management of tuberculosis infections across healthcare facilities.


COVID-19 , Tuberculosis , Humans , Tuberculosis/diagnosis , Italy , SARS-CoV-2 , Internet , Infection Control/methods , Clinical Laboratory Information Systems
13.
Emerg Infect Dis ; 30(6): 1069-1076, 2024 Jun.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38781679

Antimicrobial resistance in healthcare-associated bacterial pathogens and the infections they cause are major public health threats affecting nearly all healthcare facilities. Antimicrobial-resistant bacterial infections can occur when colonizing pathogenic bacteria that normally make up a small fraction of the human microbiota increase in number in response to clinical perturbations. Such infections are especially likely when pathogens are resistant to the collateral effects of antimicrobial agents that disrupt the human microbiome, resulting in loss of colonization resistance, a key host defense. Pathogen reduction is an emerging strategy to prevent transmission of, and infection with, antimicrobial-resistant healthcare-associated pathogens. We describe the basis for pathogen reduction as an overall prevention strategy, the evidence for its effectiveness, and the role of the human microbiome in colonization resistance that also reduces the risk for infection once colonized. In addition, we explore ideal attributes of current and future pathogen-reducing approaches.


Anti-Bacterial Agents , Cross Infection , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Humans , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/microbiology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/pharmacology , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use , Microbiota/drug effects , Bacterial Infections/prevention & control , Bacterial Infections/microbiology , Infection Control/methods , Bacteria/drug effects
14.
AMA J Ethics ; 26(5): E383-389, 2024 May 01.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38700522

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a looming pandemic whose poor health outcomes are unlikely to be equitably distributed. This article focuses on intersections between AMR and inequities in health care workplaces in the United States and identifies the following as key problems: lack of published data on task-specific occupational health risks related to colonization and infection with antimicrobial-resistant pathogens, limited scientific literature reporting on race and ethnicity, and poor access to infection control educational opportunities for minoritized health care workers. This article argues that an equitable approach to remediating these problems requires improving surveillance and expanding research on how AMR is likely to influence health outcomes among members of the US-based health care workforce.


Health Personnel , Humans , United States , Drug Resistance, Microbial , Occupational Health , Infection Control , Workplace , Drug Resistance, Bacterial , Anti-Bacterial Agents/therapeutic use
15.
J Infus Nurs ; 47(3): 175-181, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38744242

Due to low compliance by bedside nursing with a central line-associated bloodstream infection (CLABSI) prevention bundle and increased CLABSI rates, a mandatory re-education initiative at a 1200-bed university-affiliated hospital was undertaken. Despite this, 2 units, housing high-risk immunocompromised patients, continued to experience increased CLABSI rates. A quality improvement before-after project design in these units replaced bedside nursing staff with 2 nurses from the vascular access team (VAT) to perform central vascular access device (CVAD) dressing changes routinely every 7 days or earlier if needed. The VAT consistently followed the bundled components, including use of chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG)-impregnated dressings on all patients unless an allergy was identified. In this case, a non-CHG transparent semipermeable membrane dressing was used. There were 884 patients with 14 211 CVAD days in the preimplementation period and 1136 patients with 14 225 CVAD days during the postimplementation period. The VAT saw 602 (53.0%) of the 1136 patients, performing at least 1 dressing change in 98% of the patients (n = 589). The combined CLABSI rate for the 2 units decreased from 2.53 per 1000 CVAD days preintervention to 1.62 per 1000 CVAD days postintervention. The estimated incidence rate ratio (IRR) for the intervention was 0.639, a 36.1% reduction in monthly CLABSI rates during the postimplementation period.


Bandages , Catheter-Related Infections , Catheterization, Central Venous , Chlorhexidine , Humans , Catheter-Related Infections/prevention & control , Chlorhexidine/therapeutic use , Chlorhexidine/administration & dosage , Chlorhexidine/analogs & derivatives , Catheterization, Central Venous/adverse effects , Quality Improvement , Vascular Access Devices , Infection Control/methods , Hospitals, University
16.
Afr J Prim Health Care Fam Med ; 16(1): e1-e9, 2024 May 06.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38708728

BACKGROUND:  Stroke patients who are discharged from hospital because of limited access to rehabilitation facilities are cared for by lay caregivers who at times have limited knowledge of infection prevention and control (IPC). User-friendly educational interventions can help bridge this knowledge gap and enhance safe care of these persons. AIM:  To describe the development and validation of educational interventions for home-based stroke patients. The validation process enhanced the reliability and validity of the job aid resulting in standardised quality patient care of stroke patients. SETTING:  Mutasa district, Manicaland province, Zimbabwe. METHODS:  The systematic six steps in quality intervention development guided the development of the job aid. Graphic designers assisted with development of diagrams and annotations. A purposively selected eight-member panel of IPC expert reviewers was invited to validate the job aid using a standardised validation tool. RESULTS:  The panel agreed that the job aid's title, target group and media of instruction were adequately explained, and the background could be easily understood during practice. The content was approved with some modifications on the description of instructions to caregivers. Seven reviewers agreed that the materials used ensured understandability, acceptability, practicability and usability of the educational interventions by caregivers, and one reviewer was neutral in commenting effectiveness of the job aid. CONCLUSION:  The developed job aid addressed knowledge barriers in IPC for caregivers, and the reviewers confirmed that the developed job aid was adequate for effective use by lay home-based caregivers.Contribution: Utilisation of this intervention standardises patient care practices.


Caregivers , Home Care Services , Stroke , Humans , Zimbabwe , Home Care Services/standards , Reproducibility of Results , Infection Control/methods , Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice , Female , Male
17.
BMJ Open Qual ; 13(Suppl 2)2024 May 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38719521

INTRODUCTION: Infection prevention and control (IPC) is imperative towards patient safety and health. The Infection Prevention and Control Assessment Framework (IPCAF) developed by WHO provides a baseline assessment at the acute healthcare facility level. This study aimed to assess the existing IPC level of selected public sector hospital facilities in Punjab to explore their strengths and deficits. METHODS: Between October and April 2023, 11 public sector hospitals (including tertiary, secondary and primary level care) were selected. Data were collected using the IPCAF assessment tool comprising eight sections, which were then categorised into four distinct IPC levels- inadequate, basic, intermediate and advanced. Key performance metrics were summarised within and between hospitals. RESULTS: The overall median IPCAF score for the public sector hospitals was 532.5 (IQR: 292.5-690) out of 800. Four hospitals each scored 'advanced' as well as 'basic' IPC level and three hospitals fell into 'intermediate level'. Most hospitals had IPC guidelines as well as IPC programme, environments, materials and equipments. Although 90% of secondary care hospitals had IPC education and training, only 2 out of 5 (40%) tertiary care and 2 out of 3 (67%) primary care hospitals have IPC or additional experts for training. Only 1 out of 5 tertiary care hospitals (20%) were recorded in an agreed ratio of healthcare workers to patients while 2 out of 5 (40%) of these hospitals lack staffing need assessment. CONCLUSION: Overall the sampled public sector (tertiary, secondary and primary) hospitals demonstrated satisfactory IPC level. Challenging areas are the healthcare-associated infection surveillance, monitoring/audit and staffing, bed occupancy overall in all the three categories of hospitals. Periodic training and assessment can facilitate improvement in public sector systems.


Hospitals, Public , Infection Control , Humans , Hospitals, Public/statistics & numerical data , Infection Control/methods , Infection Control/standards , Infection Control/statistics & numerical data , India , Public Sector/statistics & numerical data , Cross Infection/prevention & control
18.
PLoS One ; 19(5): e0299823, 2024.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38722954

BACKGROUND: Hospital infection control policies protect patients and healthcare workers (HCWs) and limit the spread of pathogens, but adherence to COVID-19 guidance varies. We examined hospital HCWs' enactment of social distancing and use of personal protective equipment (PPE) during the COVID-19 pandemic, factors influencing these behaviours, and acceptability and feasibility of strategies to increase social distancing. METHODS: An online, cross-sectional survey (n = 86) and semi-structured interviews (n = 22) with HCWs in two English hospitals during the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic (May-December 2020). The Capability, Opportunity, Motivation (COM-B) model of behaviour change underpinned survey and topic guide questions. Spearman Rho correlations examined associations between COM-B domains and behaviours. Interviews were analysed using inductive and deductive thematic analysis. Potential strategies to improve social distancing were selected using the Behaviour Change Wheel and discussed in a stakeholder workshop (n = 8 participants). RESULTS: Social distancing enactment was low, with 85% of participants reporting very frequently or always being in close contact with others in communal areas. PPE use was high (88% very frequently or always using PPE in typical working day). Social distancing was associated with Physical Opportunity (e.g., size of physical space), Psychological Capability (e.g., clarity of guidance), and Social Opportunity (e.g., support from managers). Use of PPE was associated with Psychological Capability (e.g., training), Physical Opportunity (e.g., availability), Social Opportunity (e.g., impact on interactions with patients), and Reflective Motivation (e.g., beliefs that PPE is effective). Local champions and team competition were viewed as feasible strategies to improve social distancing. CONCLUSIONS: It is valuable to understand and compare the drivers of individual protective behaviours; when faced with the same level of perceived threat, PPE use was high whereas social distancing was rarely enacted. Identified influences represent targets for intervention strategies in response to future infectious disease outbreaks.


COVID-19 , Health Personnel , Personal Protective Equipment , Humans , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , COVID-19/psychology , Male , Female , England/epidemiology , Health Personnel/psychology , Cross-Sectional Studies , Adult , Pandemics/prevention & control , Middle Aged , SARS-CoV-2 , Surveys and Questionnaires , Physical Distancing , Infection Control/methods
19.
Environ Health Perspect ; 132(5): 56001, 2024 May.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728217

BACKGROUND: Respiratory tract infections are major contributors to the global disease burden. Quantitative microbial risk assessment (QMRA) holds potential as a rapidly deployable framework to understand respiratory pathogen transmission and inform policy on infection control. OBJECTIVES: The goal of this paper was to evaluate, motivate, and inform further development of the use of QMRA as a rapid tool to understand the transmission of respiratory pathogens and improve the evidence base for infection control policies. METHODS: We conducted a literature review to identify peer-reviewed studies of complete QMRA frameworks on aerosol inhalation or contact transmission of respiratory pathogens. From each of the identified studies, we extracted and summarized information on the applied exposure model approaches, dose-response models, and parameter values, including risk characterization. Finally, we reviewed linkages between model outcomes and policy. RESULTS: We identified 93 studies conducted in 16 different countries with complete QMRA frameworks for diverse respiratory pathogens, including SARS-CoV-2, Legionella spp., Staphylococcus aureus, influenza, and Bacillus anthracis. Six distinct exposure models were identified across diverse and complex transmission pathways. In 57 studies, exposure model frameworks were informed by their ability to model the efficacy of potential interventions. Among interventions, masking, ventilation, social distancing, and other environmental source controls were commonly assessed. Pathogen concentration, aerosol concentration, and partitioning coefficient were influential exposure parameters as identified by sensitivity analysis. Most (84%, n=78) studies presented policy-relevant content including a) determining disease burden to call for policy intervention, b) determining risk-based threshold values for regulations, c) informing intervention and control strategies, and d) making recommendations and suggestions for QMRA application in policy. CONCLUSIONS: We identified needs to further the development of QMRA frameworks for respiratory pathogens that prioritize appropriate aerosol exposure modeling approaches, consider trade-offs between model validity and complexity, and incorporate research that strengthens confidence in QMRA results. https://doi.org/10.1289/EHP12695.


Respiratory Tract Infections , Risk Assessment/methods , Respiratory Tract Infections/epidemiology , Respiratory Tract Infections/microbiology , Humans , SARS-CoV-2 , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/prevention & control , Staphylococcus aureus , Infection Control/methods , Legionella , Aerosols
20.
BMC Infect Dis ; 24(1): 475, 2024 May 07.
Article En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38714946

BACKGROUND: Prior to September 2021, 55,000-90,000 hospital inpatients in England were identified as having a potentially nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection. This includes cases that were likely missed due to pauci- or asymptomatic infection. Further, high numbers of healthcare workers (HCWs) are thought to have been infected, and there is evidence that some of these cases may also have been nosocomially linked, with both HCW to HCW and patient to HCW transmission being reported. From the start of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic interventions in hospitals such as testing patients on admission and universal mask wearing were introduced to stop spread within and between patient and HCW populations, the effectiveness of which are largely unknown. MATERIALS/METHODS: Using an individual-based model of within-hospital transmission, we estimated the contribution of individual interventions (together and in combination) to the effectiveness of the overall package of interventions implemented in English hospitals during the COVID-19 pandemic. A panel of experts in infection prevention and control informed intervention choice and helped ensure the model reflected implementation in practice. Model parameters and associated uncertainty were derived using national and local data, literature review and formal elicitation of expert opinion. We simulated scenarios to explore how many nosocomial infections might have been seen in patients and HCWs if interventions had not been implemented. We simulated the time period from March-2020 to July-2022 encompassing different strains and multiple doses of vaccination. RESULTS: Modelling results suggest that in a scenario without inpatient testing, infection prevention and control measures, and reductions in occupancy and visitors, the number of patients developing a nosocomial SARS-CoV-2 infection could have been twice as high over the course of the pandemic, and over 600,000 HCWs could have been infected in the first wave alone. Isolation of symptomatic HCWs and universal masking by HCWs were the most effective interventions for preventing infections in both patient and HCW populations. Model findings suggest that collectively the interventions introduced over the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in England averted 400,000 (240,000 - 500,000) infections in inpatients and 410,000 (370,000 - 450,000) HCW infections. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to reduce the spread of nosocomial infections have varying impact, but the package of interventions implemented in England significantly reduced nosocomial transmission to both patients and HCWs over the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic.


COVID-19 , Cross Infection , Health Personnel , SARS-CoV-2 , Humans , COVID-19/transmission , COVID-19/prevention & control , COVID-19/epidemiology , Cross Infection/prevention & control , Cross Infection/transmission , England/epidemiology , Computer Simulation , Infection Control/methods , State Medicine , Masks/statistics & numerical data
...