Biopharmaceuticals and biosimilars in psoriasis: what the dermatologist needs to know.

The entry of biosimilar forms of biopharmaceutical therapies for the treatment of psoriasis and other immune-mediated disorders has provoked considerable interest. Although dermatologists are accustomed to the use of a wide range of generic topical agents, recognition of key differences between original agent (ie, the name brand) and the generic or biosimilar agent is necessary to support optimal therapy management and patient care. In this review we have summarized the current state of the art related to the impending introduction of biosimilars into dermatology. Biosimilars represent important interventions that are less expensive and hence offer the potential to deliver benefit to large numbers of patients who may not currently be able to access these therapies. But the development of biosimilars is not equivalent to that of small molecule generic therapies because of differences in molecular structure and processes of manufacture. The planned regulatory guidelines and path to approval may not encompass all of these potentially important differences and this may have clinical relevance to the prescriber and patient. Consequently, we have identified a series of key issues that should be considered to support the full potential of biosimilars for the treatment of psoriasis; ie, that of increased access to appropriate therapy for the psoriasis population worldwide.

An assessment of biological potency and molecular characteristics of different innovator and noninnovator interferon-beta products.

Approved innovator products and their noninnovator "copy" versions are likely to vary in their quality, eg, physicochemical characteristics and biological activity, with important implications for clinical efficacy and safety. Therefore, it is important to study and thoroughly evaluate the noninnovator products in comparison with approved products at the preclinical and clinical stages. We have obtained 4 noninnovator interferon (IFN)-ß-1a products currently marketed in Latin America and Iran and compared these with approved IFN-ß-1a products (Avonex and Rebif) obtained from the same geographical regions with respect to biological potency, estimated by in vitro bioassays, and molecular characteristics, assessed by immunoblotting and high-performance liquid chromatography. In this article, we present our data showing that the noninnovator IFN-ß-1a products can vary considerably in their biological potency. In addition, we showed that all IFN-ß-1a products formulated with human serum albumin contained variable amounts of higher-molecular-weight aggregates of IFN-ß-1a and adducts with human serum albumin, these being more prevalent in 2 noninnovator IFN-ß-1a products where biological potency was reduced compared with approved IFN-ß-1a products. Additionally, significant lot-to-lot variability was observed for one of the noninnovator products. Taken together, the results of this study highlight the need for not only thorough in vitro characterization, but also preclinical and clinical assessment to ensure patient safety and efficacy.

Biological standardization of human interferon beta: establishment of a replacement world health organization international biological standard for human glycosylated interferon beta.

Human interferon beta (IFN-beta) has been developed as a major biotherapeutic agent for the treatment of multiple sclerosis. Since World Health Organization (WHO) international standards (IS) for IFN-beta were established several years prior to the development of clinical grade IFN-beta products, a number of scientific issues with regard to the biological standardisation of natural and recombinant IFN-beta products have emerged. In order to address these issues, an international collaborative study to evaluate WHO IS and candidate international standards (CIS) of IFN-beta was instigated by the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) in 2000 and was carried out in the succeeding year. Sixteen expert laboratories from 8 countries worldwide participated in the study. They performed titrations on 8 different IFN-beta preparations, including IS and new CIS, in a variety of mainly antiviral- but also including some antiproliferative- and reporter gene-assays, and contributed raw data from these assays to NIBSC for statistical analysis and calculation of potencies. While both intra- and inter-laboratory variation of potency estimates was evident, overall validity of the study as a whole was clearly shown by comparison of two pairs of internal coded duplicates, which gave the expected relative potency of 1 and the lowest inter-laboratory variability of potency estimates in all assay types. The CIS containing Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cell- or human fibroblast-derived, glycosylated, IFN-beta gave similar low inter-laboratory variation in potency estimates one to another as the coded duplicates, which was significantly less than to the 2nd WHO IS of IFN-beta, human fibroblast-derived, Gb23-902-531. One of these CIS, designated 00/572, containing CHO cell-derived IFN-beta and formulated with both bovine casein and human serum albumin, could be assigned a potency, consistent for all assay types, of 40,000 international units (IU) per ampoule relative to the IU of the 2nd IS of IFN-beta, Gb23-902-531. Other CIS containing glycosylated IFN-beta, either CHO cell- or human-fibroblast-derived, could also be assigned potency values that were continuous with the IU of Gb23-902-531 and 00/572. However, greater inter-laboratory variations in estimates were evident from comparisons of Gb23-902-531 or 00/572 with either the 1st IS for E. coli-derived, non-glycosylated, IFN-beta with serine substitution at position 17 (IFN-beta Ser 17 mutein), Gxb02-901-535, or with a CIS (00/574) containing IFN-beta Ser 17 mutein. Indeed, variations in potency estimates for preparations containing IFN-beta Ser 17 mutein were sufficiently large to indicate that assays could distinguish preparations of IFN-beta Ser 17 mutein from preparations of glycosylated IFN-beta. Thus, neither the 2nd IS of IFN-beta, Gb23-902-531, containing fibroblast-derived IFN-beta, nor CIS, 00/572, containing CHO cell-derived IFN-beta, was appropriate for standardisation of preparations of IFN-beta Ser 17 mutein. Conversely, neither the IS of IFN-beta Ser 17 mutein, Gxb02-901-535, or a CIS of IFN-beta Ser 17 mutein, 00/574, was appropriate for the standardisation of preparations of glycosylated IFN-beta. CIS 00/572, containing CHO cell-derived, glycosylated IFN-beta, was clearly shown to be suitable to serve as a primary standard for glycosylated forms of IFN-beta, especially clinical grade IFN-beta-1a products. It was further shown to exhibit high thermal and long-term stability. Since the CHO cell-derived IFN-beta used for preparation of 00/572 was of a greater purity than the IFN-beta used for the 2nd IS of IFN-beta, Gb23-902-531, it was recommended by the WHO Informal Consultation on the Standardisation of Cytokines, Growth Factors and Other Endocrinological Substances, which met in October 2003, that 00/572 should replace Gb23-902-531 as the IS for glycosylated IFN-beta. This recommendation was accepted by the WHO Expert Committee on Biological Standardization (ECBS) at its annual meeting in November 2003 and 00/572 was established as the 3rd IS for human glycosylated IFN-beta with an assigned potency of 40,000 IU. As this study identified no advantage to replacing the existing 1st IS for IFN-beta Ser 17 mutein, Gxb02-901-535, WHO ECBS accepted that this should continue to serve as the IS for this material.

Computational and in vitro analysis of destabilized DNA regions in the interferon gene cluster: potential of predicting functional gene domains.

Recent evidence adds support to a traditional concept according to which the eukaryotic nucleus is organized into functional domains by scaffold or matrix attachment regions (S/MARs). These regions have previously been predicted to have a high potential for stress-induced duplex destabilization (SIDD). Here we report the parallel results of binding (reassociation) and computational SIDD analyses for regions within the human interferon gene cluster on the short arm of chromosome 9 (9p22). To verify and further refine the biomathematical methods, we focus on a 10 kb region in the cluster with the pseudogene IFNWP18 and the interferon alpha genes IFNA10 and IFNA7. In a series of S/MAR binding assays, we investigate the promoter and termination regions and additional attachment sequences that were detected in the SIDD profile. The promoters of the IFNA10 and the IFNA7 genes have a moderate approximately 20% binding affinity to the nuclear matrix; the termination sequences show stronger association (70-80%) under our standardized conditions. No comparable destabilized elements were detected flanking the IFNWP18 pseudogene, suggesting that selective pressure acts on the physicochemical properties detected here. In extended, noncoding regions a striking periodicity is found of rather restricted SIDD minima with scaffold binding potential. By various criteria, the underlying sequences represent a new class of S/MARs, thought to be involved in a higher level organization of the genome. Together, these data emphasize the relevance of SIDD calculations as a valid approach for the localization of structural, regulatory, and coding regions in the eukaryotic genome.

[Interferon beta-1b now also for the secondary progressive form of multiple sclerosis?]. / Interferon bèta-Ib nu ook voor de secundair progressieve vorm van multiple sclerose?

Recently, a placebo-controlled multicentre randomised clinical trial was published on the efficacy of interferon beta-Ib in the treatment of secondary progressive multiple sclerosis. The study was stopped after the interim analysis because evidence of efficacy was already clear. However, the results appear to be considerably less convincing. The decision to prematurely stop the clinical trial was based more on an overestimate of the p-values than on the clinical relevance of the treatment effects. The efficacy of interferon should be investigated in relation to other treatment options, such as immunoglobulin, copolymer I, azathioprine and methotrexate.

Interferon standardization and designations.

A large number of different human and nonhuman interferon (IFN) preparations are now available for either research purposes or commercial use. Consistency of results can be achieved only through rigorous application of biologic standards and individual species designation. International standards for the potency determinations of these preparations have been produced in accordance with World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines and are available for calibrating assays. Until recently, potency has been assessed purely as a measure of antiviral activity expressed in international units. Other biologic properties are now also being considered, including antiproliferation and immunomodulation. Indirect methods of measuring IFN, such as radioimmunoassay or enzyme immunoassay, if fully validated, may also provide useful estimates of function. Reference antisera are useful for characterizing IFN preparations and for monitoring neutralization assays for detecting anti-IFN antibodies but should not have a function in assay calibration. Factors to be considered when referring to specific designations for pure IFN species include distinctions for the species of origin, any mutant or hybrid forms, the method of production, and the presence of additional glycosylation.

Global regulatory considerations for unified assay specifications.

When developing a biotechnology product for global registration, there are several aspects to evaluate in an effort to unify specifications. These include differences between the United States, Europe and Japan, and Rest-of-World (ROW) countries with regard to the respective regulatory guidelines and pharmacopoeias in force, the state-of-the-art of product testing analytical methods, and the interval between submitting a registration dossier to different countries. In terms of regulatory guidelines, one country may have a monograph or required specifications for particular tests, for example the potency that a product has to meet before clinical trials can be initiated. For pharmacopoeias, different assay methods are required for sterility, general safety, and pyrogen testing, so that one may have to test a specific lot of a product at two or three different times to evaluate the same parameter, because of specific testing differences required for each country's pharmacopoeia. In addition, the state of analytical methods is always evolving and better analytical techniques become available. Sometimes, from starting with one set of tests, and based on the time in development, new tests may be added to the existing list of release specifications, because new analytical techniques have become available. Examining the global registration approval process for Betaseron, (interferon beta-1b) illustrates when specifications were able to be unified and when they were not.