Risk factors for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs): a three-centric case-control study.

PURPOSE: Risk factors for sporadic GEP-NENs are still not well defined. To identify the main clinical risk factors represents the aim of this study performed by three Italian referral centers for NENs. METHODS: We performed a retrospective case-control study including 148 consecutive sporadic GEP-NENs and 210 age- and sex-matched controls. We collected data on clinical features, cancer family history and other potential risk factors. RESULTS: Mean age was 58.3 ± 15.8 years; 50% males, primary site was pancreas (50.7%), followed by ileum (22.3%). The 62.8% and 29.1% of cases were G1 and G2, respectively; the 40% had locally advanced or metastatic disease at diagnosis. Independent risk factors for GEP-NENs were: family history of non-neuroendocrine GEP cancer (OR 2.16, 95% CI 1.31-3.55, p = 0.003), type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) (OR 2.5, 95% CI 1.39-4.51, p = 0.002) and obesity (OR 1.88, 95% CI 1.18-2.99, p = 0.007). In the T2DM subjects, metformin use was a protective factor (OR 0.28, 95% CI 0.08-0.93, p = 0.049). T2DM was also associated with a more advanced (OR 2.39, 95% CI 1.05-5.46, p = 0.035) and progressive disease (OR 2.47, 95% CI 1.08-5.34, p = 0.03). Stratifying cases by primary site, independent risk factors for pancreatic NENs were T2DM (OR 2.57, 95% CI 1.28-5.15, p = 0.008) and obesity (OR 1.98, 95% CI 1.11-3.52, p = 0.020), while for intestinal NENs family history of non-neuroendocrine GEP cancer (OR 2.46, 95% CI 1.38-4.38, p = 0.003) and obesity (OR 1.90, 95% CI 1.08-3.33, p = 0.026). CONCLUSION: This study reinforces a role for family history of non-neuroendocrine GEP cancer, T2DM and obesity as independent risk factors for GEP-NENs and suggests a role of metformin as a protective factor in T2DM subjects. If confirmed, these findings could have a significant impact on prevention strategies for GEP-NENs.

High-Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Improved Prognostic Stratification With the New World Health Organization 2019 Classification: A Validation Study From a Single-Institution Retrospective Analysis.

OBJECTIVES: There is a pressing need to develop clinical management pathways for grade 3 (G3) gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP NEN). METHODS: We performed a retrospective study on patients with metastatic G3 GEP NEN. The relationship between baseline characteristics and progression-free survival and overall survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: We included 142 patients (74 well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors [WDNETs], 68 poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas [PDNECs]). Patients with WDNET had prolonged survival compared with PDNEC (median, 24 vs 15 months, P = 0.0001), which persisted in both pancreatic and nonpancreatic cohorts. Well-differentiated morphology, Ki-67 <50% and positive somatostatin receptor imaging were independently associated with prolonged survival. Of the subgroup treated with first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, response rates were favorable (partial response, 47%; stable disease, 30%); there was no significant difference in response rates nor progression-free survival between WDNET and PDNEC despite significantly prolonged overall survival in the WDNET cohort. CONCLUSIONS: Our study corroborates the knowledge of 2 prognostically distinct subgroups within the World Health Organization 2019 G3 GEP NEN population, observed in both pancreatic and nonpancreatic gastrointestinal cohorts. Definitive management pathways are needed to reflect the differences between G3 WDNET and PDNEC.

Time trends in incidence and survival of small intestinal cancer in Sweden.

BACKGROUND: Small intestinal cancer is less common than some other gastrointestinal malignancies. Tumours of different histological types and anatomical sites of origin have therefore often been described together. The aim of this study was to investigate the epidemiology for each of the four main subtypes: duodenal adenocarcinoma (D-AC), duodenal neuroendocrine tumour (D-NET), jejunoileal adenocarcinoma (J/I-AC), and jejunoileal neuroendocrine tumour (J/I-NET). METHODS: All patients with small intestinal cancer diagnosed between 1960 and 2015 were identified from the Swedish Cancer Register. The age-adjusted incidence rate with incidence rate ratios, as well as overall (OS) and net (NS) survival, were determined and temporal trends were analysed. RESULTS: The incidence rate was highest for J/I-NET, with 9.98 clinical diagnoses per million in 2010-2015. Clinical diagnosis of D-AC increased more than 10-fold and surpassed J/I-AC as the second most common subtype. D-NET was by far the least common subtype. Diagnosis at autopsy became less common over time, whereas clinical diagnoses increased significantly for all four subtypes. All subtypes except J/I-AC affected men more often than women. The age distribution was similar between subtypes, although patients with adenocarcinomas were slightly older. Survival was generally much better for patients with NET than for those with adenocarcinoma. Both OS and NS showed a negative association with advancing age. Survival improved only for J/I-NET from a 5-year NS of 0.69 in the 1960s to 0.81 in 2010-2015. CONCLUSION: The incidence of small intestinal cancer is increasing, particularly for D-AC and in the elderly. Survival of patients with small intestinal cancer has improved only for J/I-NET over the last decades.

Extensive molecular reclassification: new perspectives in small bowel adenocarcinoma?

SBA classification is still based on the location of the primary tumor, without genetic information. in the current study, an extensive genetic profile of SBA, was performed in order to identify and quantify targetable alterations for a future precision medicine in SBA. Clinical-pathological information for 24 patients affected by SBA were retrospectively reviewed. Whole genome analysis of the primary tumors was performed by the FOUNDATION Cdx technology. We carried out a functional enrichment analysis of the mutated genes with BioPlanet. Integrative clustering analysis revealed three distinct subtypes characterized by different genomic alterations. Cluster 1exhibited significant correlations with MSI status, high TMB, celiac disease and Jejunual site.We defined cluster 1 as "immunological subtype" (29.2% of patients). Driver mutations in this subtype suggest that 100% of patients may benefit from immunotherapy. Enrichment analysis of cluster 2 highlighted that the main affected pathway was that of homologous DNA pairing and strand exchange (16.7% of patients). We defined this cluster as "DNA Damage Repair (DDR) like". On the basis of these driver molecular alterations, 100% of patients could benefit from PARPi. Finally, Cluster 3 had no significant correlations with clinical-pathological characteristics (54.1% of patients). Enrichment analysis revealed that this cluster has remarkable similarities with CRA genomic profile, so we defined it as "Colon-like". SBA is a genetically distinct tumor entity and deep mutation heterogeneity indicates that different driver genes play a role in the biology of these tumors. The identification of clusters based on genetic profile suggest the possibility to go beyond chemotherapy in several patients.

Recent classifications systems for gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors A single-center experience.

AIM: In this study, we aimed to review the demographic histopathological and clinical findings and long-term results of our GEP-NET cases, as well as to re-evaluate our cases according to the new classification systems. MATERIAL AND METHOD: 46 patients diagnosed as GEPNETs were presented. Immunohistochemical studies were performed in all cases. The cases were divided into 3 groups according to their embryogenic origin (Foregut, Midgut and Hindgut). All cases re-evaluated according to recent WHO (2019) and AJCC (2017) TNM calcification. Investigation was made to find differences between the embryonic origins and to find correlation between stage and grading systems with each other. RESULTS: The most common localization was appendix (52.3%) The distribution of cases according to embryologic origin were as follows: foregut tumors 13 cases (27.7%), midgut tumors 27 cases (57.4%) and hindgut tumors in 6 cases (12.8%). The Ki-67 ratio was evaluated in all patients, with a mean of 6.34%±2.51 (range: 1-80). The Ki-67 ratio was less than 3% in 82.6% of patients. Mitotic count was less than 2 per/10 HPF in 76% of patients. According to WHO 2019 most of patients were Grade 1 Neuroendocrine Tumor (65.2%) and there were only 2 Neuroendocrine Carcinoma (NEC) cases. According to AJCC 2017 most cases were Stage 1 (52.1%) and only 4 cases were Stage 4. The grades and stages of our cases were statistically significantly correlated. Overall survival did not differ significantly with regard to embryologic origin (log-rank test, p=0.062). The median overall survival was 106±7.4 months. The 5-year cumulative survival rate was 84.1±5.6 years. Seven patients died during this time with a median time of 5 months (range: 1-31 months). In the Cox regression analysis, the percentage of Ki- 67 was found to have a statistically significant effect on overall survival (p=0.000) CONCLUSION: Correlation was noticed between WHO 2019 and AJCC 2017 classification for grade and stage and controlled trials must be undertaken to develop a single diagnostic algorithm and to change the future management of such patients. KEY WORDS: Neuroendocrine Tumors, Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor.

Prognostic implications of immune classification in a multicentre cohort of patients with small intestinal adenocarcinoma.

The diagnosis of small intestinal adenocarcinoma (SIAC) is usually determined at an advanced stage due to non-specific symptoms and the difficulty of exploring the small intestine. Therefore, the majority of SIAC patients have limited chemotherapeutic options. Until recently, the development of novel and effective therapies for SIAC have been limited owing to the low number of samples that have been collected and the low incidence of SIAC. Immunotherapies are becoming a focus. However, in SIAC, only a few studies to identify immunotherapy-responsive subgroups and their prognostic indicators have been reported. In the present study, we categorise primary SIAC into four types of tumour immune microenvironments and propose a strategy for identifying patient subgroups that are most likely to be immunotherapy-responsive. Formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue samples of a multicentre cohort of patients with SIAC (n=195) were collected using tissue microarrays. Immunohistochemical (IHC) stains for PD-L1, PD-1, and CD8 were performed, and microsatellite instability was evaluated using an IHC stain. Tumour microenvironment immune type (TMIT) I [PD-L1-positive tumour cells and CD8-high tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs)] and TMIT III (PD-L1-positive tumour cells and CD8-low TILs) show the best and worse prognoses, respectively. PD-L1 expression was significantly associated with high microsatellite instability (MSI) status. CD8-high TILs were positively correlated with PD-1-high TILs and high MSI. The TMIT I subgroup demonstrated a more patent CD8/PD-L1/PD-1 signalling pathway compared to other TMITs. Therefore, the TMIT I subgroup can be expected to have an effective response to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies in SIAC. Such classification of SIACs into four immune types can be useful in predicting the prognosis of patients and the identification of immunotherapy-responsive subgroups.

Identification of a molecular signature of prognostic subtypes in diffuse-type gastric cancer.

BACKGROUND: Although recent advances in high-throughput technology have provided many insights into gastric cancer (GC), few reliable biomarkers for diffuse-type GC have been identified. Here, we aim to identify a prognostic and predictive signature of diffuse-type GC heterogeneity. METHODS: We analyzed RNA-seq-based transcriptome data to identify a molecular signature in 150 gastric tissue samples including 107 diffuse-type GCs. The predictive value of the signature was verified using other diffuse-type GC samples in three independent cohorts (n = 466). Log-rank and Cox regression analyses were used to estimate the association between the signature and prognosis. The signature was also characterized by somatic variant analyses and tissue microarray analysis between diffuse-type GC subtypes. RESULTS: Transcriptomic profiling of RNA-seq data identified a signature which revealed distinct subtypes of diffuse-type GC: the intestinal-like (INT) and core diffuse-type (COD) subtypes. The signature showed high predictability and independent clinical utility in diffuse-type GC prognosis in other patient cohorts (HR 2.058, 95% CI 1.53-2.77, P = 1.76 × 10-6). Integrative mutational and gene expression analyses demonstrated that the COD subtype was responsive to chemotherapy, whereas the INT subtype was responsive to immunotherapy with an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). Tissue microarray analysis showed the practical utility of IGF1 and NXPE2 for predicting diffuse-type GC heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: We present a molecular signature that can identify diffuse-type GC patients who display different clinical behaviors as well as responses to chemotherapy or ICI treatment.

Small-bowel carcinomas associated with celiac disease: transcriptomic profiling shows predominance of microsatellite instability-immune and mesenchymal subtypes.

Celiac disease (CD) is a risk factor for developing small-bowel carcinoma with a 14-fold higher risk compared with general population. As small-bowel carcinomas associated with CD (CD-SBCs) are extremely rare, very few molecular data are available about their pathogenesis, and information about their transcriptomic profiling is lacking. We generated RNA-seq data on 13 CD-SBCs, taken from the largest well-characterized series published so far, collected by the Small Bowel Cancer Italian Consortium, and compared the tumor transcriptional signatures with the four Consensus Molecular Subtypes (CMS) of colorectal carcinoma by applying the "CMS classifier." CpG Island Methylator Phenotype (CIMP) was evaluated using methylation-sensitive multiple ligation-dependent probe amplification. Up to 12 of 13 cancers fell within the two main subtypes exhibiting high immune and inflammatory signatures, i.e., subtypes 1 and 4. The first and predominant subset was commonly microsatellite unstable, and exhibited CIMP and high CD3+ and CD8+ T cell infiltration. Moreover, it showed increased expression of genes associated with T helper 1 and natural killer cell infiltration, as well as upregulation of apoptosis, cell cycle progression, and proteasome pathways. By contrast, cancers falling in subtype 4 showed prominent transforming growth factor-ß activation and were characterized by complement-associated inflammation, matrix remodeling, cancer-associated stroma production, and angiogenesis. Parallel histologic and histochemical analysis confirmed such tumor subtyping. In conclusion, two molecular subtypes have been consistently identified in our series of CD-SBCs, a microsatellite instability-immune and a mesenchymal subtype, the former likely associated with an indolent and the latter with a worse tumor behavior.

Gastric neuroendocrine neoplasias: manifestations and comparative outcomes.

Although gastric neuroendocrine neoplasias (gNEN) are an orphan disease, their incidence is rising. The heterogeneous clinical course powers the ongoing discussion of the most appropriate classification system and management. Prognostic relevance of proposed classifications was retrospectively analysed in 142 patients from a single tertiary referral centre. Baseline, management and survival data were acquired for statistical analyses. The distribution according to the clinicopathological typification was gNEN-1 (n = 86/60.6%), gNEN-2 (n = 7/4.9%), gNEN-3 (n = 24/16.9%) and gNEN-4 (n = 25/17.6%), while hypergastrinemia-associated gNEN-1 and -2 were all low-grade tumours (NET-G1/2), formerly termed sporadic gNEN-3 could be subdivided into gNEN-3 with grade 1 or 2 and gNEN-4 with grade 3 (NEC-G3). During follow-up 36 patients died (25%). The mean overall survival (OS) of all gNEN was 14.2 years. The OS differed statistically significant across all subgroups with either classification system. According to UICC 2017 TNM classification, OS differed for early and advanced stages, while WHO grading indicated poorer prognosis for NEC-G3. Cox regression analysis confirmed the independent prognostic validity of either classification system for survival. Particularly careful analysis of the clinical course of gNEN-1 (ECLomas, gastric carcinoids) confirmed their mostly benign, but recurrent and extremely slowly progressive behaviour with low risk of metastasis (7%) and an efficient long-term control by repetitive endoscopic procedures. Our study provides evidence for the validity of current classifications focusing on typing, grading and staging. These are crucial tools for risk stratification, especially to differentiate gNEN-1 as well as sporadic gNET and gNEC (gNEN-3 vs -4).

Comparison of three lymph node staging schemes for predicting the outcome in patients with small bowel adenocarcinoma: A population-based cohort and international multicentre cohort study.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic roles of three common lymph node staging schemes, number of positive lymph nodes (pN), lymph node ratio (LNR) and log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS) in small bowel adenocarcinoma (SBA) are unclear. We assessed their prognostic ability in SBA. METHODS: A total of 2128 patients diagnosed with SBA between 1988 and 2010 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and 186 patients from 15 hospitals in France and China were identified. We evaluated the prognostic ability of the schemes in both continuous and stratified patterns using R2, Harrell's C, and time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curve analyses. FINDINGS: For continuous pattern, the LODDS had a better capacity of discrimination and higher accuracy of prognosis than pN and LNR. Similarly, the stratified LODDS classification had a better performance of discrimination and higher accuracy of prognosis than the pN and LNR classification. The multivariable model using the LODDS classification also showed superiorly predictive accuracy and discriminatory capacity to those of the 7th and, 8th TNM node and LNR classification. These results were fully validated in an independent international multicentre cohort. INTERPRETATION: The LODDS scheme showed a better prognostic performance than the LNR or pN schemes in patients with SBA regardless of continuous or stratified pattern. The LODDS scheme could serve as an auxiliary to lymph node staging systems in future revisions of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) manual. FUND: This work was funded by the Zhejiang Province Natural Science Fund of China.

[Neuroendocrine Neoplasia within the German NET Registry]. / Neuroendokrine Neoplasien im deutschen NET-Register.

Neuroendocrine neoplasias (NEN) comprise a rare tumor entity with heterogeneous biology, prognosis and therapeutic options. Together with the recent publication of the first German guidelines on diagnostics and therapy of NEN, an analysis of the German NET-registry cohort of the German Society of Endocrinology (DGE) was performed. For this purpose, 2686 cases were extracted and their patient characteristics (e. g., age, sex, histopathological characterization, grading and staging) were displayed and outcomes were calculated. Additionally, the systemic treatment reality in the two largest subgroups, small intestinal and pancreatic NEN, was analyzed within metastatic patients.Distribution of primary tumor localization, histopathological classification, disease stage and overall survival was comparable with results from international registry studies. In concordance with current guidelines, somatostatin analogues (SSA) and peptide-receptor-radionuclide-therapy (PRRT) were the most common therapeutic modalities in small intestinal NEN. In pancreatic NEN, chemotherapy was used in first line as often as SSA. In second line, chemotherapy was used as often as PRRT. WHO-classification of 2010 and TNM staging proved to be of prognostic relevance.The current analysis of the German NET-registry characterizes a multicentric, interdisciplinary cohort of NEN patients throughout Germany and it describes the applied systemic treatment modalities and overall outcome as well as the prognostic value of the WHO classification of 2010 and TNM staging.

Intestinal T-cell and NK/T-cell lymphomas: A clinicopathological study of 27 Chinese patients.

BACKGROUND: Intestinal T-cell and NK/T- cell lymphomas are rare and aggressive. The diagnosis is quite difficult, especial in biopsy specimens. This study investigates the clinicopathological features of intestinal T-cell and NK/T-cell lymphomas to aid their differential diagnosis. METHODS: Clinical data of 27 cases were collected. Including extranodal NK/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKTCL-N), monomorphic epitheliotropic intestinal T-cell lymphoma (MEITL), peripheral T-cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified (PTCL, NOS), anaplastic large-cell lymphoma, ALK+ (ALCL, ALK+) and angioimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL). The histologic features, immunohistochemical findings, T-cell receptor gene rearrangement results, and follow-up data were analyzed, with review of literature. RESULTS: The age of the patients (N = 27) was 15-85 years (mean, 47.5 years), and male:female ratio, 3.5:1. Abdominal pain and B symptoms were the most common symptoms. Although 85.2% of the patients were in clinical stage I-II, 59.3% died within 1 year. MEITL showed certain distinctive clinic opathological features from ENKTCL-N. Compared to lesions at other sites, there were no differences in the morphological features, immunophenotype and TCR gene rearrangement of intestinal ENKTCL-N, PTCL, NOS, ALCL, ALK+ and AITL. CONCLUSION: Intestinal T-cell and NK/T-cell lymphomas are a heterogeneous group of lymphomas. They could be classified to 5 histological subtypes in our study. ENKTCL-N and MEITL formed the majority of the tumor types. Each subtype has distinctive pathological features, but most of them have diamal prognosis.

Recommended parameters for pathology reporting of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEP-NETs).

No abstract available.

Neuroendocrine Tumor Heterogeneity Adds Uncertainty to the World Health Organization 2010 Classification: Real-World Data from the Spanish Tumor Registry (R-GETNE).

BACKGROUND: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NENs) are a complex family of tumors of widely variable clinical behavior. The World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 classification provided a valuable tool to stratify neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) in three prognostic subgroups based on the proliferation index. However, substantial heterogeneity remains within these subgroups, and simplicity sometimes entails an ambiguous and imprecise prognostic stratification. The purpose of our study was to evaluate the prognostic impact of histological differentiation within the WHO 2010 grade (G) 1/G2/G3 categories, and explore additional Ki-67 cutoff values in GEP-NENs. SUBJECTS, MATERIALS, AND METHODS: A total of 2,813 patients from the Spanish National Tumor Registry (RGETNE) were analyzed. Cases were classified by histological differentiation as NETs (neuroendocrine tumors [well differentiated]) or NECs (neuroendocrine carcinomas [poorly differentiated]), and by Ki-67 index as G1 (Ki-67 <2%), G2 (Ki-67 3%-20%), or G3 (Ki-67 >20%). Patients were stratified into five cohorts: NET-G1, NET-G2, NET-G3, NEC-G2, and NEC-G3. RESULTS: Five-year survival was 72%. Age, gender, tumor site, grade, differentiation, and stage were all independent prognostic factors for survival. Further subdivision of the WHO 2010 grading improved prognostic stratification, both within G2 (5-year survival: 81% [Ki-67 3%-5%], 72% [Ki-67 6%-10%], 52% [Ki-67 11%-20%]) and G3 NENs (5-year survival: 35% [Ki-67 21%-50%], 22% [Ki-67 51%-100%]). Five-year survival was significantly greater for NET-G2 versus NEC-G2 (75.5% vs. 58.2%) and NET-G3 versus NEC-G3 (43.7% vs. 25.4%). CONCLUSION: Substantial clinical heterogeneity is observed within G2 and G3 GEP-NENs. The WHO 2010 classification can be improved by including the additive effect of histological differentiation and the proliferation index. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms are tumors of widely variable clinical behavior, roughly stratified by the World Health Organization (WHO) 2010 classification into three subgroups based on proliferation index. Real-world data from 2,813 patients of the Spanish Registry RGETNE demonstrated substantial clinical heterogeneity within grade (G) 2 and G3 neuroendocrine neoplasms. Tumor morphology and further subdivision of grading substantially improves prognostic stratification of these patients and may help individualize therapy. This combined, additive effect shall be considered in future classifications of neuroendocrine tumors and incorporated for stratification purposes in clinical trials.

Small bowel adenocarcinoma: French intergroup clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatments and follow-up (SNFGE, FFCD, GERCOR, UNICANCER, SFCD, SFED, SFRO).

BACKGROUND: This document is a summary of the French intergroup guidelines regarding the management of small bowel adenocarcinoma published in October 2016. METHOD: This collaborative work, co-directed by most French Medical Societies, summarizes clinical practice recommendations (guidelines) on the management of small bowel adenocarcinoma. Given the lack of specific data in the literature, all references are given by analogy with colon cancer. The classification used is the AJCC (American Joint Committee on Cancer) pTNM classification (7th edition 2009). RESULTS: Small bowel adenocarcinoma has a poor prognosis; less than 30% of patients survive for 5 years after the (first) diagnosis (5-year survival of less than 30%). Due to the rarity of the disease and the retrospective data, most recommendations are based on expert agreement. The initial evaluation is based on chest-abdomen-pelvis CT scan, CEA assay, GI endoscopy and colonoscopy in order detect lesions associated with a predisposing disease. Surgical treatment is currently the only curative option for stage I and II. Adjuvant chemotherapy can be discussed for Stage III and Stage II with T4 (expert agreement). With regard to metastatic tumors, treatment with fluoropyrimidine combined with platinum salts should be considered (expert agreement). CONCLUSION: Few specific data exist in the literature on this type of tumor; most of the recommendations come from expert agreements or by analogy with colon cancer. Thus, each case must be discussed within a multidisciplinary team.

Tubulopapillary rectal adenocarcinoma in dog: clinical, surgical, pathological and immunophenotypical aspects: case report / Adenocarcinoma retal tubulopapilar em cão: descrição clínica, cirúrgica, anátomo-patológica e imunofenotípica: relato de caso

Intestinal carcinomas are rare in dogs. The prognosis and survival time are dependent of the histological type, the invasion of the intestinal wall by the malignant cells and the ability of primary neoplasm to produce metastasis. This study reports a case of a Yorkshire dog that developed a rectal tubulopapillary adenocarcinoma progressing to a peritoneal carcinomatosis and multiple metastasis in large intestines, bladder, kidney, iliac lymph node, liver and lungs, six months after transanal surgical resection of the primary rectal neoplasm. Clinical, surgical, pathological and immunophenotypic findings are described. COX-2 imunohistochemical score was higher in hepatic metastasis (score 9) than in the primary tumour (score 6), and the growth fraction (Ki-67) observed was of 49.2% in the rectal neoplasm.(AU)

Carcinomas intestinais são raros em cães. O prognóstico e a sobrevida são dependentes do tipo histológico, do grau de invasão nas camadas intestinais e da capacidade da neoformação primária em desenvolver metástases. Relata-se um caso de um cão, da raça Yorkshire, que desenvolveu adenocarcinoma tubulopapilar retal com evolução para carcinomatose peritoneal e múltiplos focos metastáticos no intestino grosso, na bexiga, no rim linfonodo ilíaco, no fígado e nos pulmões seis meses após ressecção cirúrgica da neoplasia primária. Aspectos clínicos, cirúrgicos, anatomopatológicos e imunofenotípicos são descritos. O escore de COX-2 na imuno-histoquímica foi maior na metástase hepática (escore 9) do que na massa primária (escore 6), e a fração de crescimento (Ki-67) na neoplasia retal foi de 49,2%.(AU)

Management Options for Advanced Low or Intermediate Grade Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Review of Recent Literature.

Our understanding of the biology, genetics, and natural history of neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) of the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas has improved considerably in the last several decades and the spectrum of available therapeutic options is rapidly expanding. The management of patients with metastatic low or intermediate grade NETs has been revolutionized by the development of new treatment strategies such as molecular targeting therapies with everolimus and sunitinib, somatostatin analogs, tryptophan hydroxylase inhibitors, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy that can be used alone or as a multimodal approach with or without surgery. To further define and clarify the utility, appropriateness, and the sequence of the growing list of available therapies for this patient population will require more high level evidence; however, data from well-designed randomized phase III clinical trials is rapidly accumulating that will further stimulate development of new management strategies. It is therefore important to thoroughly review emerging evidence and report major findings in frequent updates, which will expand our knowledge and contribute to a better understanding, characterization, and management of advanced NETs.

Heterogeneity of grade 3 gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas: New insights and treatment implications.

Gastroenteropancreatic (GEP) neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) are currently classified as grade (G) 1, G2 and G3, in accordance with the 2010 WHO classification. G1 and G2 are named neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) whereas G3 neuroendocrine carcinomas (NECs). While advanced G1 and G2 are usually treated with several different therapies, including somatostatin analogs, chemotherapy, interferon, molecular targeted agents, peptide receptor radionuclide therapy (PRRT) and liver-directed treatments, advanced G3 NECs are usually treated with a platinum-etoposide chemotherapy, trusting their clinical homogeneity is similar to that of small cell lung cancer. However, over the last years a number of reports suggested that 2010 WHO G3 GEP NECs are more heterogeneous than expected. Therefore, we critically reviewed the literature about this topic and reported pathological and clinical considerations on 2010 WHO G3 GEP NEC category proposing new sub-categories. Over the last five years, six studies specifically investigating large series of G3 GEP NECs have been published, including around 800 patients. Tumor morphology and Ki-67 Labeling Index (that will be mentioned as Ki-67 in this manuscript) combination has been reported as a tool to define two or even three subgroups of this category with different prognosis and potentially different therapeutic approach. Prospective trials are warranted to investigate if several types of therapy other than the platinum/etoposide chemotherapy can be effective in well differentiated GEP NEN with 21-55% Ki-67 and alkylating-based chemotherapy in poorly differentiated GEP NEN with 21-55% Ki-67.